Effect of polymer coating on faecal recovery of ingested 5-amino salicylic acid in patients with ulcerative colitis

Potential of Mesalazine Therapeutic Drug Monitoring by Measuring Fecal Excretion in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis

BACKGROUND

Therapeutic drug monitoring of mesalazine (5-ASA) in patients with ulcerative colitis is unavailable. Mucosal 5-ASA concentrations are assumed to be higher during remission, but biopsy is not practical. Therefore, we investigated the feasibility of measuring mesalazine levels in feces. To explore the potential role of fecal mesalazine measurements in therapeutic drug monitoring, we compared the dry fecal concentration and daily fecal excretion of 5-ASA and its metabolite N-acetyl-5-ASA in patients with ulcerative colitis with active and quiescent disease.

METHODS

Adults with ulcerative colitis on oral mesalazine and scheduled for colonoscopy were eligible for inclusion in this cross-sectional study. Stool and urine samples were collected for 48 and 24 hours, respectively, and rectal biopsies were performed. (N-acetyl-)5-ASA was measured using mass spectrometry. Biochemically active disease was defined as a fecal calprotectin level above 100 mcg/g and endoscopically active disease as any activity following the endoscopic Mayo score (≥1).

RESULTS

Approximately 28 patients were included in the study. Daily fecal excretion of (N-acetyl-)5-ASA did not differ between patients with (n = 13) and without (n = 15) endoscopically active disease [median 572 mg/d versus 597 mg/d ( P = 0.86) for 5-ASA and 572 mg/d versus 554 mg/d ( P = 0.86) for N-acetyl-5-ASA]. The same applied to the fecal concentration [median 9.7 mcg/mg dry weight versus 10.3 ( P = 0.53) and 12.0 versus 9.9 ( P = 0.89)]. The results were comparable when the biochemical disease activity definition was used. The mucosal concentrations and urinary excretion of (N-acetyl-)5-ASA did not differentiate between quiescent and active activity.

CONCLUSIONS

Fecal (N-acetyl-)5-ASA measurements do not correlate with disease activity, which renders it an unsuitable tool for therapeutic drug monitoring of mesalazine.

pH-dependent ileocolonic drug delivery, part I: in vitro and clinical evaluation of novel systems

After the pH dependency of novel pH-dependent ileocolonic drug delivery systems is confirmed in vitro, their performance should be evaluated in human volunteers.

Modulation of colonic hydrogen sulfide production by diet and mesalazine utilizing a novel gas-profiling technology

Excessive hydrogen sulfide (H₂S) production from gut microbial metabolism may have clinically important relevance in the pathogenesis of gut disorders, including ulcerative colitis. However, little is known regarding factors that alter its production. Using a newly-designed in vitro gas-profiling technology, the study aimed to verify real-time H₂S measurement reproducibility and thereafter, assess its production following exposure to dietary factors and 5-aminosalicylate acid (5-ASA). Measurements of H₂S, carbon dioxide, hydrogen and methane measurements were compared between gas-profiling systems. Homogenized slurries were prepared from freshly-passed healthy human feces. Fifty ml slurries were aliquoted into separate fermentation chambers and substrates added including 1 g highly fermentable fructo-oligosaccharides (FOS) or resistant starch Hi-Maize (RS), or minimally fermentable psyllium or sterculia, 1 g cysteine, 0.9 g sodium sulfate or 1.2 mL of 1 M 5-ASA alone or in combinations. H₂S release was sampled every 5 mins over 4-h and expressed relative to unspiked controls. RS suppressed H₂S production by a mean 89.0 (SEM 4.8)% and FOS by 82.2 (6.2)% compared to <35 (17)% by psyllium and sterculia (p<0.001, two-way ANOVA). Cysteine stimulated H₂S production by 1557 (532)%. The addition of FOS to slurries containing cysteine significantly suppressed H₂S by 90 (2)% over the addition of 5-ASA (0.3 (2)%, p<0.001). Sulfate and 5-ASA had minimal overall effects. In conclusion, the H₂S-profiling technology is a reproducible tool. Production of H₂S is greatly enhanced by sulfur-amino acids but not inorganic sulfate, and is effectively suppressed by readily fermentable fibers. These findings inform potential designs of dietary therapies to reduce H₂S production in vivo.

Mesalazine Modified-Release Tablet in the Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis in the Remission Phase: A Chinese, Multicenter, Single-Blind, Randomized Controlled Study

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of two mesalazine formulations in the treatment of Chinese patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) in the remission phase.

METHODS

In this multicenter, single-blind, randomized controlled study conducted from November 2010 to August 2012, 251 patients with UC from 18 hospitals were enrolled. The patients were randomized to treatment with mesalazine modified-release tablets (MR group, n = 126) or other enteric-coated tablets (EC group, n = 125), at 800 mg three-times daily for 48 weeks. The primary efficacy parameter was the rate of non-emergence of bloody stool. If the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval (CI) of the primary efficacy measure was over -10%, the modified-release tablets were considered non-inferior to the enteric-coated tablets. The secondary efficacy parameters included the period of non-emergence of bloody stool and the period of non-recurrence of UC. The incidences of adverse events and adverse drug reactions were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

At 48 weeks of maintenance treatment, the rates of non-emergence of bloody stool were 82.99% (95% CI 73.53-92.45%) and 73.30% (95% CI 64.04-82.56%) in the MR and EC groups, respectively, and the difference between the two groups was 9.69% (95% CI -1.15-20.53%). There was no significant difference in the period of non-emergence of bloody stool and the period of non-recurrence of UC between the two groups (P > 0.05). The incidences of adverse events were 48.78% (60/123) and 48.00% (60/125) in the MR and EC groups, respectively (P = 0.902). The incidences of adverse drug reactions were 16.26% (20/123) and 13.60% (17/125) in the MR and EC groups, respectively (P = 0.556).

CONCLUSION

Mesalazine modified-release tablets were non-inferior to the enteric-coated tablets and may be considered an effective and safe treatment alternative for the maintenance of remission in Chinese patients with UC.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01257399.

FUNDING

Tillotts Pharma AG.

Mesalazine Modified-Release Tablet in the Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis in the Active Phase: A Chinese, Multicenter, Single-Blind, Randomized Controlled Study

INTRODUCTION

This study compared the efficacy and safety of two mesalazine formulations in the treatment of Chinese patients with mildly to moderately active ulcerative colitis (UC).

METHODS

In this multicenter, single-blind, randomized controlled study of 251 patients with active UC conducted from November 2010 to January 2012, subjects were randomized to treatment with mesalazine modified-release tablets (MR group, n = 123) or enteric-coated tablets (EC group, n = 128) at 800 mg three-times daily for 8 weeks. The primary efficacy measure was the decrease in UC Disease Activity Index (UCDAI) at final evaluation. If the 95% confidence interval (CI) lower limit of the difference of the decrease in UCDAI between groups was over -1.0, mesalazine modified-release tablets were considered non-inferior to mesalazine enteric-coated tablets. The change in UCDAI in patients with mild and moderate (UCDAI 3-5 and 6-8 at enrollment, respectively) UC was analyzed. Secondary efficacy measures were remission and efficacy rates. Incidences of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were calculated.

RESULTS

The decreases in UCDAI at final evaluation were 2.84 and 2.56 in the MR and EC groups, respectively, with a difference of 0.27 between groups (95% CI -0.34, 0.88). The remission rates were 48.33% (58/120) and 55.65% (69/124), and the efficacy rates were 63.33% (76/120) and 66.94% (83/124) in the MR and EC groups, respectively (all P > 0.05). In patients with mild UC, the decreases in UCDAI were 2.16 and 2.05 in the MR and EC groups, respectively, while in patients with moderate UC they were 3.49 and 3.03, respectively (all P > 0.05). The incidences of ADRs in the MR and EC groups were 6.61% (8/121) and 10.24% (13/127), respectively (P > 0.05). No serious ADRs were reported during the study.

CONCLUSION

Mesalazine modified-release tablets are non-inferior to enteric-coated tablets and are an effective and safe treatment option in Chinese patients with mildly to moderately active UC.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01257386.

FUNDING

Tillotts Pharma AG.

Direct comparison of two different mesalamine formulations for the maintenance of remission in patients with ulcerative colitis: a double-blind, randomized study

BACKGROUND

Mesalamine has been used as the first-line medication for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). We directly compared the efficacy and safety of two different mesalamine formulations in the maintenance of remission in patients with UC.

METHODS

In a multicenter, double-blind, randomized study, 131 patients with quiescent UC were assigned to two groups: 65 to receive a pH-dependent release formulation of mesalamine at 2.4 g/day (pH-2.4 g) and 66 to receive a time-dependent release formulation of mesalamine at 2.25 g/day (Time-2.25 g). Both formulations were administered three times daily for 48 weeks. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients without bloody stools.

RESULTS

In the full analysis set (n = 130), the proportion of patients without bloody stools was 76.9% in the pH-2.4 g and 69.2% in the Time-2.25 g, demonstrating the noninferiority of pH-2.4 g to Time-2.25 g. No statistically significant difference in time to bloody stools was found between the two formulations (P = 0.27, log-rank test), but the time to bloody stools tended to be longer in pH-2.4 g compared to Time-2.25 g, and a similar trend was observed with regard to the time to relapse. No differences were observed between the safety profiles of the two formulations.

CONCLUSIONS

The pH- and time-dependent release of mesalamine formulations were similarly safe and effective. Interestingly, the remission phase tended to be longer in the group that received the pH-dependent formulation compared to the group that received the time-dependent formulation (UMIN Clinical Trials Registry, no. C000000289).

Direct comparison of two different mesalamine formulations for the induction of remission in patients with ulcerative colitis: a double-blind, randomized study

BACKGROUND

Mesalamine is the first-line drug for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). We directly compared the efficacy and safety of two mesalamine formulations for the induction of remission in patients with UC.

METHODS

In a multicenter, double-blind, randomized study, 229 patients with mild-to-moderate active UC were assigned to 4 groups: 66 and 65 received a pH-dependent release formulation of 2.4 g/day (pH-2.4 g) or 3.6 g/day (pH-3.6 g), respectively; 65 received a time-dependent release formulation of 2.25 g/day (Time-2.25 g), and 33 received placebo (Placebo). The drugs were administered three times daily for eight weeks. The primary endpoint was a decrease in the UC disease activity index (UC-DAI).

RESULTS

In the full analysis set (n = 225) the decrease in UC-DAI in each group was 1.5 in pH-2.4 g, 2.9 in pH-3.6 g, 1.3 in Time-2.25 g and 0.3 in Placebo, respectively. These results demonstrate the superiority of pH-3.6 g over Time-2.25 g (P = 0.003) and the noninferiority of pH-2.4 g to Time-2.25 g. Among the patients with proctitis-type UC, a significant decrease in UC-DAI was observed in pH-2.4 g and pH-3.6 g as compared to Placebo, but not in Time-2.25 g. No differences were observed in the safety profiles.

CONCLUSIONS

Higher dose of the pH-dependent release formulation was more effective for induction of remission in patients with mild-to-moderate active UC. Additionally, the pH-dependent release formulation was preferable to the time-dependent release formulation for patients with proctitis-type UC (UMIN Clinical Trials Registry, no. C000000288).

Pharmacokinetics and safety of single and multiple doses of Asacol tablets in Japanese healthy volunteers

INTRODUCTION

The pharmacokinetics and safety of Asacol (Tillotts Pharma AG, Ziefen, Switzerland), which has been used worldwide to treat ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease, were studied in Japanese healthy male volunteers.

METHODS

Drug plasma concentrations and urinary and fecal excretions after a single dose (400-4800 mg) and multiple doses (3600 mg/day for 7 days) were investigated.

RESULTS

All adverse events were "not serious." The peak plasma concentration (C max) was reached at 12.3-18.0 hours after a single dose, and the C max and area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) of mesalazine and its N-acetyl metabolite were proportional to the doses. The C max and AUC in non-Japanese subjects reported in the literature were closely correlated to findings in Japanese subjects, and external excretions were also similar in the Japanese and non-Japanese subjects.

CONCLUSIONS

Asacol was safe and well tolerated in this Japanese population, and the non-Japanese clinical data could be extrapolated to the Japanese population.

Review article: 5-aminosalicylate formulations for the treatment of ulcerative colitis--methods of comparing release rates and delivery of 5-aminosalicylate to the colonic mucosa

BACKGROUND

Many oral 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) formulations are designed to maximize 5-ASA release in the colon where it acts topically on the colonic mucosa. Delayed-release formulations and azo-prodrugs minimize 5-ASA absorption in the upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract.

AIMS

To review methods for assessing 5-ASA release and colonic distribution from oral formulations, and the potential use of this information for guiding clinical decisions.

METHODS

PubMed and recent conference abstracts were searched for articles describing techniques used to assess 5-ASA release from ulcerative colitis (UC) therapies.

RESULTS

In-vitro GI models, although unable to simulate more complex aspects of GI physiology, can provide useful data on 5-ASA release kinetics and bioaccessibility. Gamma-scintigraphy is useful for investigating GI disintegration of different formulations, but may not accurately reflect 5-ASA distribution. Plasma pharmacokinetic studies provide data on systemic exposure, but not on colonic distribution or mucosal uptake. Mucosal biopsies provide direct evidence of colonic distribution and may predict clinical efficacy, but must be interpreted cautiously because of considerable inter-subject variability and other confounding factors.

CONCLUSION

While assessment of 5-ASA release is important, limitations of individual measurement techniques mean that randomized clinical studies in UC patients remain the best guide for dosing and treatment regimen decisions.

Oral 5-ASA therapy in ulcerative colitis: what are the implications of the new formulations?

5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) is the standard first-line treatment for mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis. A variety of 5-ASA delivery systems are available and in development, including both oral and rectal formulations; all of which aim to deliver the active drug to the colon while minimizing systemic absorption. Because the efficacy of most oral 5-ASA therapies is broadly similar, the appropriate selection of a given formulation often relies on other factors. This article explores the differences between oral 5-ASA formulations in terms of their delivery system, reviews the available data on oral 5-ASA treatment efficacy and tolerability, and examines the rationale for changing from one 5-ASA formulation to another if a patient does not respond to, or worsens on, their existing agent.

Use of mesalazine in diverticular disease

Diverticular disease includes a spectrum of conditions sharing the underlying pathology of acquired diverticula of the colon: symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease, recurrent symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease, and complicated diverticular disease. Goals of therapy in diverticular disease should be to improve symptoms and to prevent recurrent attacks in symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease, and to prevent the complications of disease such as diverticulitis. Inflammation seems to play a key role in all forms of the disease. This is the rationale for the use of anti-inflammatory drugs such as mesalazine. Inflammation in such diseases seems to be generated by a heightened production of proinflammatory cytokines, reduced anti-inflammatory cytokines, and enhanced intramucosal synthesis of nitric oxide. The mechanisms of action of mesalazine are not yet well understood. It is an anti-inflammatory drug that inhibits factors of the inflammatory cascade (such as cyclooxygenase) and free radicals, and has an intrinsic antioxidant effect. Some recent studies confirm the efficacy of mesalazine in diverticular disease both in relief of symptoms in symptomatic uncomplicated forms and in prevention of recurrence of symptoms and main complications.

Mesalamine delivery systems: do they really make much difference?

Sulfasalazine's role as the first-line of therapy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease has led to the development of other "designer" aminosalicylates, which eliminate the sulfa-moiety, and attempt to target the topically active mesalamine to the inflamed bowel. Olsalazine sodium and balsalazide disodium utilize the same azo-bond structure as sulfasalazine, requiring release of active mesalamine by colonic bacteria, and thus targeting these agents to the colon. Other mesalamine delivery systems use pH-dependant- or moisture-release to liberate the active mesalamine in both the large and small bowel. Direct application of mesalamine via enema or suppository is also effective in patients with distal colitis. The pharmacology and thus the undesirable drug absorption rates differ between drugs, although the clinical importance of these characteristics is debatable. Differences in release-systems, the impact of the fed and fasting state, and unique patient intolerances to individual agents demand an understanding of each of these products, and their application to patient therapy.

Role of mesalazine in acute and long-term treatment of ulcerative colitis and its complications

BACKGROUND

Sulfasalazine, consisting of 5-aminosalicylic acid bound to sulfapyridine by a diazo bond, was first used for treatment of ulcerative colitis in the early 1940s and later found effective in placebo-controlled trials for acute disease and for long-term maintenance of remission. Later studies found that the active moiety is 5-ASA (mesalazine, mesalamine) and the sulfapyridine moiety acts as a carrier molecule but causes many of the symptomatic adverse reactions.

METHODS

Review of the literature.

RESULTS

The finding that 5-ASA in the active motility led to the development of mesalazine prodrugs, olsalazine (Dipentum) and balsalazide (Colazide, Colazal), and targeted release mesalazine preparations, such as Asacol, Pentasa, and Salofalk, as well as enemas and suppository preparations for distal disease. Most patients with adverse effects from sulfasalazine will tolerate mesalazine. Mesalazine has been shown equivalent or superior to sulfasalazine, and superior to placebo, with a dose-response benefit, in inducing remission of acute disease. and comparable to sulfasalazine and superior to placebo for long-term maintenance of remission. Better tolerance of mesalazine and the ability to use higher doses favor its use in patients intolerant of sulfasalazine and in patients failing to respond to usual doses of sulfasalazine. Adverse effects from mesalazine are uncommon, but include idiosyncratic worsening of the colitis symptoms and renal toxicity. Mesalazine is safe to use during pregnancy and for nursing mothers. As maintenance therapy, mesalazine may reduce the risk of developing colorectal carcinoma.

CONCLUSION

Mesalazine represents effective and well-tolerated first-line therapy for mildly to moderately acute disease as well as for the long-term maintenance treatment in the patient with ulcerative colitis.

Systematic review: the pharmacokinetic profiles of oral mesalazine formulations and mesalazine pro-drugs used in the management of ulcerative colitis

AIM

: To quantify through systematic review the pharmacokinetic profiles of the oral delayed release and sustained release mesalazine (5-aminosalicylate, 5ASA) formulations (Asacol, Salofalk, Mesasal, Claversal, Pentasa) and pro-drugs (sulfasalazine, olsalazine, balsalazide) used in the management of ulcerative colitis.

METHODS

: Selected articles had: (1) adult healthy volunteers or patients with ulcerative colitis and (2) quantification of pharmacokinetic data to include, at a minimum, urinary excretion of total 5ASA [5ASA plus N-Acetyl-5ASA (N-Ac-5ASA)].

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

: Pharmacokinetic data (Tmax, Cmax, AUC, urinary excretion, faecal excretion) of 5ASA, its major metabolite N-Acetyl-5ASA, total 5ASA, and the parent pro-drug compounds was extracted.

MAIN RESULTS

: The summary results for urinary excretion of total 5ASA over 24-96 h in all subjects (either mean or median) were: sulfasalazine mean 11-33% or median 22%; olsalazine mean 14-31% or median 16-27%; balsalazide mean 12-35% or median 20%; Asacol mean 10-35% or median 18-40%; Pentasa mean 15-53% or median 23-34%; Salofalk, Mesasal and Claversal mean 27-56% or median 31-44%. The summary results for faecal excretion of total 5ASA over 24-96 h in all subjects (either mean or median) were: sulfasalazine mean 23-75% or median 38%; olsalazine mean 47-50% or median 17-36%; balsalazide mean 46% or median 22%; Asacol mean 40-64% or median 20-56%; Pentasa mean 12-51% or median 39-59%; Salofalk, Mesasal and Claversal mean 37-44% or median 23-35%.

CONCLUSIONS

: The systemic exposure to 5ASA, as measured by urinary excretion of total 5ASA, and the faecal excretion of total 5ASA is comparable for all oral mesalazine formulations and pro-drugs. Thus, selection of a mesalazine therapy for the treatment of ulcerative colitis should be based on other factors such as efficacy, dose-response, toxicity of the parent compound and its metabolites, compliance issues related to dose forms and dosing schedules, and costs.

Intestinal luminal pH in inflammatory bowel disease: possible determinants and implications for therapy with aminosalicylates and other drugs

Measurements of luminal pH in the normal gastrointestinal tract have shown a progressive increase in pH from the duodenum to the terminal ileum, a decrease in the caecum, and then a slow rise along the colon to the rectum. Some data in patients with ulcerative colitis suggest a substantial reduction below normal values in the right colon, while limited results in Crohn's disease have been contradictory. Determinants of luminal pH in the colon include mucosal bicarbonate and lactate production, bacterial fermentation of carbohydrates and mucosal absorption of short chain fatty acids, and possibly intestinal transit. Alterations in these factors, as a result of mucosal disease and changes in diet, are likely to explain abnormal pH measurements in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). It is conceivable that reduced intracolonic pH in active ulcerative colitis impairs bioavailability of 5-aminosalicylic acid from pH dependent release formulations (Asacol, Salofalk) and those requiring cleavage by bacterial azo reductase (sulphasalazine, olsalazine, balsalazide), but further pharmacokinetic studies are needed to confirm this possibility. Reports that balsalazide and olsalazine may be more efficacious in active and quiescent ulcerative colitis, respectively, than Asacol suggest that low pH may be a more critical factor in patients taking directly pH dependent release than azo bonded preparations. Reduced intracolonic pH also needs to be considered in the development of pH dependent colonic release formulations of budesonide and azathioprine for use in ulcerative and Crohn's colitis. This paper reviews methods for measuring gut pH, its changes in IBD, and how these may influence current and future therapies.

Mucosal 5-aminosalicylic acid concentration inversely correlates with severity of colonic inflammation in patients with ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC) with 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) does not have the same therapeutic effect in all patients. We tested the hypothesis that the effectiveness of the drug is related to its mucosal concentration.

PATIENTS

Twenty one UC patients receiving oral 5-ASA (2.4-3.2 g/day) were enrolled in the study. Four were also receiving topical treatment (2 g/day).

METHODS

Six endoscopic biopsies were taken from the rectum for measurement of 5-ASA concentrations (ng/mg) by HPLC; soluble interleukin 2 receptor (sIL-2R) concentrations (U/ml) were measured by ELISA and histology. Endoscopic and histological appearance was graded on a four point scale (0-3). The Wilcoxon's rank test and Pearson's correlation coefficient were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Mucosal concentrations of 5-ASA were significantly higher (p=0.03) in patients with endoscopic scores of 0-1 compared with those with scores of 2-3 (16.1 (range 10.2-45) v 5. 5 (3.5-17.4), respectively) and in patients with lower histological inflammation compared with those with more severe scores (17.4 (10. 5-45) v 8.9 (3.5-17.2), respectively) (p<0.01). In contrast, mucosal sIL2-R concentrations were significantly lower in patients with slight endoscopic and histological lesions than in those with more severe disease. A significative inverse correlation (r=-0.85) was found between 5-ASA and sIL-2R mucosal concentrations (p=0.00008).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with UC, in the same area of the intestinal tract, we found that the higher the 5-ASA mucosal concentrations, the lower the IL-2R levels and endoscopic and histological scores. We hypothesise that maintenance of high mucosal 5-ASA concentrations in all colonic segments could contribute to improve clinical outcome in UC patients.

The contribution of sulphate reducing bacteria and 5-aminosalicylic acid to faecal sulphide in patients with ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND

Butyrate oxidation within the colonocyte is selectively inhibited by hydrogen sulphide, reproducing the metabolic lesion observed in active ulcerative colitis.

AIMS

To study generation of hydrogen sulphide by sulphate reducing bacteria (SRB) and the effects of 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) in patients with ulcerative colitis in order to identify a role of this noxious agent in pathogenesis.

PATIENTS

Fresh faeces were obtained from 37 patients with ulcerative colitis (23 with active disease) and 16 healthy controls.

METHODS

SRB were enumerated from fresh faecal slurries and measurements made of sulphate reducing activity, and sulphate and hydrogen sulphide concentrations. The effect of 5-ASA on hydrogen sulphide production was studied in vitro.

RESULTS

All controls and patients with active ulcerative colitis carried SRB and total viable counts were significantly related to the clinical severity grade. SRB were of two distinct types: rapidly growing strains (desulfovibrios) which showed high sulphate reduction rates, present in 30% of patients with ulcerative colitis and 44% of controls; and slow growing strains which had little activity. In vitro, 5-ASA inhibited sulphide production in a dose dependent manner; in patients with ulcerative colitis not on these drugs faecal sulphide was significantly higher than in controls (0.55 versus 0.25 mM, p=0.027).

CONCLUSIONS

Counts and carriage rates of SRB in faeces of patients with ulcerative colitis are not significantly different from those in controls. SRB metabolism is not uniform between strains and alternative sources of hydrogen sulphide production exist in the colonic lumen which may be similarly inhibited by 5-ASA. The evidence for hydrogen sulphide as a metabolic toxin in ulcerative colitis remains circumstantial.

Prevention of post-operative recurrence of Crohn's disease requires adequate mucosal concentration of mesalazine. Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio del Colon e del Retto

BACKGROUND

Surgical resection of Crohn's disease is followed by early recurrence in a high percentage of patients. Mesalazine has been shown to be effective in the prevention of post-operative recurrence, but some 50% of patients under treatment recur at 3 years of follow-up.

AIM

To establish whether the mucosal concentration of mesalazine might affect the development of post-operative recurrence.

METHODS

Colon-ileoscopy was performed in 25 consecutive patients resected for Crohn's disease. The mean time from surgery was 14 months. After the operation, all patients were taking oral mesalazine (Asacol, 2.4 g/day). Ten patients showed signs of endoscopic recurrence (apthae, ulcers, narrowing of the lumen) in the neoterminal ileum, five of whom also showed juxta-anastomotic colonic involvement. Fifteen patients were free of recurrence. At endoscopy, four biopsies were taken from the perianastomotic area (two specimens at the ileal site and two specimens at the colonic site of the anastomosis). The specimens were weighed and immediately frozen at -80 degrees C. Mesalazine concentration (ng/mg) was measured in tissue homogenates by high- performance liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection. Fisher's exact test was used for the statistical analysis.

RESULTS

The mean value of mucosal mesalazine concentration, expressed as ng/mg of tissue, was significantly lower in patients with recurrence than in those without recurrence both in the ileum (mean +/- s.d.: 21.6+/-28.3 vs. 70.9+/-47.4; P = 0.007) and in the colon (25.8+/-26.4 vs. 60.3+/-32.5; P = 0.010).

CONCLUSIONS

The mucosal concentration of mesalazine in the juxta-anastomatic area is significantly lower in patients with recurrence than in those free of recurrence. These data could suggest an association between mucosal mesalazine concentrations and the clinical effectiveness of the drug.

Delivery and fate of oral mesalamine microgranules within the human small intestine

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Oral use of mesalamine in inflammatory bowel disease requires slow-release preparations to prevent premature absorption and inactivation. Resulting luminal concentrations within the human small intestine are unknown. The aim of this study was to determine human intestinal delivery patterns of mesalamine from a microgranule preparation (Pentasa; Ferring Arzeimittel, Kiel, Germany) effective in Crohn's disease with small bowel involvement.

METHODS

A multilumen tube for duodenal, jejunal, and ileal aspiration and marker perfusion was placed in 6 normal subjects. Levels of luminal, plasma, and urinary mesalamine and its main metabolite, acetyl mesalamine, were measured for 7 hours after ingestion of mesalamine (500 mg) with a labeled meal.

RESULTS

Gastric emptying of mesalamine paralleled the meal, and its release occurred throughout the small intestine (cumulative, 20% of dose). For 4 hours, mean luminal mesalamine and acetyl mesalamine concentrations were 52 and 38 micrograms/mL (duodenum), 59 and 82 micrograms/mL (jejunum), and 64 and 104 micrograms/mL (ileum). Cumulative colonic delivery was 82% (7% dissolved, 75% in microgranules), and urinary excretion was 3.5%.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the major part of continuous-release mesalamine is delivered to the colon, large proportions are liberated and available at high concentrations within the small intestinal lumen, thus explaining its therapeutic efficacy in small intestinal Crohn's disease.

Oroileal transit of slow release 5-aminosalicylic acid

The predominant active anti-inflammatory moiety in chronic inflammatory bowel disease is 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA). As unprotected 5-ASA is rapidly absorbed in the upper gastrointestinal tract several slow release preparations have been developed to permit passage of 5-ASA to the lower small bowel and to the colon. To investigate luminal kinetics and extent of the release of 5-ASA intraluminal concentrations and loads of this compound together with that of its main metabolite acetyl-5-aminosalicylic acid (ac-5-ASA) were studied, over 15 hours after giving the slow release preparation Salofalk at a dose of 500 mg orally together with a test meal. Plasma concentrations and urinary excretion were also measured. Six healthy volunteers swallowed an 11 lumen oroileal tube, which allowed marker perfusion, aspiration of luminal content from the duodenum, mid-jejunum, and ileum, and recording of intestinal motility. Emptying of 5-ASA into the duodenum started after emptying of the meal, together with the first phase III of interdigestive motility. Mean luminal concentrations of 5-ASA and ac-5-ASA increased continuously from duodenum (both: 15 to 30 micrograms/ml) to ileum (60 to 110 micrograms/ml and 80 to 150 micrograms/ml respectively) over three hours and decreased over the next three hours. During 10 hours after eating, 30% of the total dose passed the ileum in solution and another 10% were excreted in urine. Thus about 60% reached the colon unreleased from tablets and another 30% were in solution. The ratio of 5-ASA and ac-5-ASA in solution was about 1:1 in the duodenum and 1:1.5 to 1:2 in the more distal small intestine. The data suggest that the large quantities of intraluminal ac-5-ASA are generated in the intestinal mucosa and reach the lumen by back diffusion. The results show that most of the 5-ASA from this slow release preparation is delivered into the colon, which explains its effectiveness in ulcerative colitis. The considerable luminal concentrations already present in the distal ileum might justify therapeutic trials in Crohn's disease.

Is topical therapy necessary in acute distal colitis? Double-blind comparison of high-dose oral mesalazine versus steroid enemas in the treatment of active distal ulcerative colitis

Thirty-seven patients suffering an attack of acute distal ulcerative colitis of mild or moderate severity were randomized in a double-blind, double-dummy fashion to receive either 800 mg oral mesalazine four times daily (18 patients) or steroid enemas twice daily (19 patients) for 4 weeks. Both treatments were well tolerated with no adverse effects. Three patients in each group were withdrawn because of clinical deterioration but both treatments produced significant clinical improvement with decreases in stool frequency and scores for urgency, bleeding and tenesmus. There were no significant differences between the treatments although there was a slight trend in favour of the enemas for reduction in rectal bleeding. Activity of the colitis as graded at sigmoidoscopy also decreased significantly with both treatments and there were corresponding improvements in histological parameters of inflammatory activity assessed with the aid of a computerized morphometric system. Little correlation was seen between clinical, sigmoidoscopic and histological changes.

High-performance liquid chromatographic assay of 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) and its metabolites N-beta-D-glucopyranosyl-5-ASA, N-acetyl-5-ASA, N-formyl-5-ASA and N-butyryl-5-ASA in biological fluids

A fast, highly sensitive high-performance liquid chromatographic method for the simultaneous determination of 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) and its metabolites N-beta-D-glucopyranosyl-5-ASA, N-formyl-5-ASA, N-acetyl-5-ASA and N-butyryl-5-ASA has been developed using a dynamically modified silica approach on a 40 mm x 4.6 mm I.D. column packed with 3-microns Hypersil. Plasma proteins are precipitated with acetonitrile. After extraction of the acetonitrile into 1,1,1-trichloroethane an undiluted aqueous phase containing the analytes is obtained. The detection limits are in the range 0.002-0.05 microgram/ml in plasma at a signal-to-noise ratio of 3 using fluorescence detection.

Mesalamine in ulcerative colitis

Sulfasalazine has been used for many years in the management of ulcerative colitis. As many as 20 percent of patients treated with it experience intolerable adverse effects usually attributed to its sulfapyridine component. The other active component is 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA); the only 5-ASA enema preparation currently available in the U.S. is mesalamine (Rowasa, Reid-Rowell) containing 5-ASA 4 g in 60 mL. In clinical trials, mesalamine has proved efficacious in treating refractory cases of distal ulcerative colitis, proctitis, and proctosigmoiditis. Because of its high cost compared with more conventional treatment modalities, it should be reserved for cases that are either refractory or intolerant to conventional treatment.

Mesalazine. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic potential in chronic inflammatory bowel disease

Mesalazine (5-aminosalicylic acid; mesalamine), the active moiety of sulphasalazine (salazosulfapyridine), is available in specially formulated oral and rectal forms for the treatment of active ulcerative colitis of mild to moderate severity and for maintenance therapy during disease remission. Tablets or capsules coated with acrylic-based resin and tablets containing microgranules coated with ethylcellulose deliver mesalazine to the distal small intestine and colon, thus avoiding the need for the carrier, sulphapyridine, which is responsible for many of the adverse effects associated with sulphasalazine. Since mesalazine is released in the small intestine from some coated preparations in contrast to sulphasalazine, these oral formulations have therapeutic potential in Crohn's disease. A limited number of therapeutic trials suggest that orally administered mesalazine 1.5 to 2.4g daily is of similar efficacy to sulphasalazine 2 to 3g daily in patients with mild to moderate ulcerative colitis. The efficacy of mesalazine enemas has been more widely investigated, a dose of 1 to 4g once daily being consistently more effective than placebo and apparently similar to enemas of prednisone 25mg or oral sulphasalazine 3g. Initial results suggest that mesalazine 4g enemas may be more effective than those containing hydrocortisone 100mg. Mesalazine and sulphasalazine in approximately equivalent oral dosages are similarly effective in maintaining remission in ulcerative colitis. Orally administered coated mesalazine is generally well tolerated by about 85% of patients allergic to or intolerant of sulphasalazine, the remainder experiencing similar reactions to both drugs. Adverse effects of mesalazine enemas are confined to local irritation and effects resulting from enema-tip insertion. Thus, orally administered coated mesalazine is a suitable alternative to sulphasalazine in the treatment of patients with mild to moderate active distal ulcerative colitis and for maintaining remission particularly in patients allergic to or intolerant of sulphasalazine. In patients who find enema therapy acceptable, mesalazine enemas are effective and well tolerated.

Inflammatory bowel disease

An increasing number of options are available for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease; the selection depends on the extent and severity of the disease. Experience with sulfasalazine and corticosteroids has led to a proliferation of 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) compounds and experimentation with alternative corticosteroid preparations. Given rectally 5-ASA is particularly effective in the treatment of distal ulcerative colitis, and experience is accumulating with several oral formulations. Metronidazole is useful in some cases, and immunosuppressive agents have a role in some patients with chronic refractory disease. A variety of measures, such as nutritional therapy, surgery and psychosocial support, are important elements of therapy. Further therapeutic innovations are expected as the etiology and pathogenesis are clarified.

Newer 5-aminosalicylic acid based drugs in chronic inflammatory bowel disease

Since the discovery that 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) is the active moiety of sulphasalazine in the treatment of chronic inflammatory bowel disease, several new 5-ASA based drugs have been developed. These consist either of slow- or delayed-release formulations of plain 5-ASA or sulpha-free azo compounds of 5-ASA. The different formulations and compounds have varying bioavailabilities, which makes it possible to use them alternatively in different clinical situations. A review of the literature is given, together with suggestions as to how the new drugs might be used in different clinical situations.

Medical treatment of ulcerative colitis: scoring the advances

Recently, oenological prejudices were challenged by the use of a points scoring system (from 50 to 100) to evaluate wine in a book now widely regarded as one of the most authoritative. On this scale, a 1981 Chateau Citran described as 'emaciated' scored 65, a 1983 Chateau Kirwan scored 85, and a 1982 Petrus 100. If the same approach were used for drugs used in ulcerative colitis to quantify an advance over conditions existing at the time of its introduction how would they score? Because they were the first available drugs in their class and clearly constituted major advances, corticosteroids and sulphasalazine both score 95, the score being limited by a high level of side effects. The new salicylates score 75, because they extend the benefits of sulphasalazine to a minority of patients but they have the potential to score 90 if increased dosing and greater effectiveness over sulphasalazine can be achieved. Salicylate enemas score 80, because they advance treatment over topical corticosteroids for patients with resistant distal disease, but the mode of delivery needs improvement. Steroid foams also score 80, particularly if the patient's vote is taken into account. Azathioprine's score cannot be calculated because there is doubt over its efficacy, but it is potentially 88 if it saves patients with difficult disease from colectomy. We can only guess what an oral non-absorbed steroid would score, but if response rates for relapse were substantially improved, or if corticosteroids could be used as effective maintenance treatment, it could be as high as 95. There are indications that we should 'watch this space'.