Double blind multicentre comparison of omeprazole 20 mg once daily versus ranitidine 150 mg twice daily in the treatment of cimetidine or ranitidine resistant duodenal ulcers

Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of Proton Pump Inhibitors and Histamine-2 Receptor Antagonists in the Management of Patients With Peptic Ulcer Disease: A Systematic Review

Peptic ulcer disease (PUD) refers to the occurrence of an open erosion in the inner lining of the stomach, duodenum, or sometimes lower esophagus. Treatments like proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) or histamine 2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs) are available on the market to efficiently treat the break in the mucosal lining. However, there is little evidence about the effects of the medication on the type and location of the ulcer and the epigastric pain caused by disintegration and increased acidity in the stomach. Given the above, we conducted a systematic review comparing the safety and efficacy of PPIs and H2RAs in various ulcer locations (gastric, duodenal, and pre-pyloric) and the effect of prolonging the treatment with the same medication or changing into a drug from another class in treatment-resistant ulcers. We employed major research literature databases and search engines such as PubMed, Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), Science Direct, and Google Scholar to find relevant articles. After a thorough screening, a quality check using various tools, and applying filters that suited our eligibility criteria, we identified eight articles, of which five were random clinical trials (RCTs), two review articles, and one meta-analysis. This study compares the different side effects of PPIs and H2RAs. Most studies concluded that omeprazole is superior in healing ulcers and bringing pain relief and that patients resistant to H2RAs can be treated better when switched to a PPI. This study also discusses the adverse effects of chronic use, such as diarrhea, constipation, headaches, and gastrointestinal infections. Patients on long-term PPI therapy are required to take calcium supplements to prevent the risk of fractures in older adults. Regarding long-term outcomes, PPIs remain the mainstay of treatment for peptic ulcer disease, based on the papers we reviewed.

Is there any acid peptic disease that is refractory to proton pump inhibitors?

Non-healing and delayed healing during acid inhibition treatment depend on the extent to which acid and 'non-acid' factors are causative in the particular acid peptic disease, and on the effectiveness and duration of acid suppression. Refractoriness (defined arbitrarily) occurs less often with proton pump inhibitors than with H2-receptor antagonists as the former decrease acid more effectively; H2-receptor antagonist-refractory disease usually responds to treatment with proton pump inhibitors. In Rotherham, 5-10% of duodenal ulcer and gastric ulcer patients are refractory (not healed after > or = 3 months of standard-dose H2-receptor antagonist). In patients with oesophagitis 15% are refractory to high-dose H2-receptor antagonist (for example, 3.2 g cimetidine daily) and 5% to standard-dose proton pump inhibitors (for example, 20 mg omeprazole daily). In controlled clinical trials of patients with refractory duodenal ulcer, healing at 8 weeks with 40 mg omeprazole o.m. vs. continued standard-dose H2-receptor antagonist was 98% vs. 60%; and with 40 mg omeprazole vs. continued high-dose H2-receptor antagonist (2 g + 3 g cimetidine, that is, ultra-refractory disease) was 92% vs. 67%. After healing, in open studies, relapse with maintenance 400-800 mg cimetidine nocte was 45-69% at one year, but 0% with 40 mg omeprazole administered for up to 6.5 years. For 53 patients with refractory gastric ulcer, in an open study, healing with omeprazole 40 mg o.m. occurred in 94% at 8 weeks, and none relapsed on long-term maintenance treatment at this dose. In controlled trials of patients with refractory oesophagitis, healing at 12 weeks with 40 mg omeprazole o.m. vs. high-dose ranitidine (300 mg b.d.) was 90% vs. 47%, and with maintenance 20 mg omeprazole o.m. vs. 150 mg ranitidine b.d., relapse at 1 year was 32% vs. 88%. In conclusion, acid peptic disease refractory to H2-receptor antagonists is uncommon and treatment with proton pump inhibitors is effective. Refractoriness to proton pump inhibitors is rare.

Future prospects for proton pump inhibitors

Future prospects for proton pump inhibitors depend on their efficacy and safety relative to H2-receptor antagonists, the therapeutic standard for acid peptic disorders. As safety concerns diminish, efficacy considerations become more important as these may pertain to cost effectiveness. Comparative, controlled trials show that omeprazole and lansoprazole are somewhat more effective than H2-blockers in healing duodenal and gastric ulcers, providing faster relief of symptoms. Relapse after cessation of therapy is similar between the two classes. The proton pump inhibitors are substantially more effective in healing lesions and relieving symptoms in patients with reflux oesophagitis, and are particularly effective in cases that have failed to heal after 12 weeks of treatment with H2-blockers. Relapse rates of oesophagitis are significantly less with prolonged treatment with omeprazole than ranitidine. A proton pump inhibitor combined with amoxicillin is less effective than triple therapy with antibiotics and bismuth in eradicating Helicobacter pylori infections, but is more convenient and associated with fewer side-effects. Efficacy might be improved by more optimal dosing regimens. Prospects for reversible proton pump inhibitors depend on the balance between their theoretical advantages and their acid inhibition profile which, at present, closely resembles that of H2-blockers.

Proton pump inhibitory therapy: then and now

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) have been established as the new "gold standard" for traditional acid-inhibitory treatment of the so called "peptic" diseases. Due to the high antisecretory and ulcer-healing potency of omeprazole, no major improvements of the efficacy in ulcer healing and pain relief can be expected. Pantoprazole, as a further development in PPIs, is characterized by improved pharmacokinetic behavior as well as by higher tissue selectivity and binding specificity and by a very low potential to interact with the cytochrome P450 enzyme system. These characteristics may provide the basis for a low potential for side effects and for a more favorable interaction profile, although the clinical relevance of these potential advantages remains to be proven. Reflux esophagitis will also remain a domain for the traditional use of PPIs in the future. However, in the treatment of gastroduodenal ulcers, the acid inhibitory potential of PPIs will be used mainly to facilitate the eradication of H. pylori.

Do concomitant diseases and therapies affect the persistence of ulcer symptoms in the elderly?

Risk factors of slow healing were previously researched in a large sample of duodenal (DU) and gastric ulcer (GU) patients over 65 years of age; persistence of ulcer symptoms was proven the most reliable factor in predicting nonhealing ulcer, while ulcer size was of importance only for DU. We aimed to complete the analysis, with a more careful evaluation of concomitant diseases and therapies. Ranitidine 300 mg daily was given for four to eight weeks to 310 GU and 699 DU patients. Ninety-three patients dropped out of the study; 79/294 gastric ulcers and 138/635 duodenal ulcers were unhealed after four weeks. Cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, and pulmonary disorders were the most frequent concomitant diseases; NSAIDs, cardiovascular drugs, and antihypertensives were the most frequent concomitant therapies. Esophagitis was diagnosed in 15.5% of patients. Ulcer healing was the major determinant of persistence of ulcer symptoms; esophagitis emerged as an important adjunctive and independent factor. Use of hypoglycemic agents in the whole sample and smoking habit (in GU) may have also a role. With persistence of ulcer symptoms removed from the analysis, ulcer size was the most constant factor affecting ulcer healing. NSAID use, cardiovascular disorders, esophagitis (in GU), and concomitant therapy with cardiovascular drugs (in DU) also play a role. In conclusion, persistence of ulcer symptoms, the major indicator of slow ulcer healing in the elderly, is independently affected also by the presence of esophagitis. Use of hypoglycemic agents and smoking habit may also have a role in persistence of ulcer symptoms. NSAIDs, cardiovascular disorders, cardiovascular drugs, and esophagitis affect ulcer healing, for which the most constant indicators remained persistence of ulcer symptoms and ulcer size.

Ranitidine: a pharmacoeconomic evaluation of its use in acid-related disorders

Ranitidine is a histamine H 2-receptor antagonist which, on the basis of its well established tolerability and efficacy profile, has been widely prescribed for the treatment of ulcer disease and mild to moderate reflux oesophagitis. However, the advent of more powerful gastric acid inhibitors (e.g. acid pump inhibitors) and the realisation of the role of Helicobactor pylori infection in duodenal ulcer disease could have considerable clinical and economic implications for the use of ranitidine (and other H 2-receptor antagonists). Simulation modelling studies based on current pricing policies in Europe predict that ranitidine-based treatment will be less cost effective than omeprazole in the short term healing of duodenal ulcer and reflux oesophagitis disease. During longer term treatment, omeprazole is expected to be the dominating strategy over ranitidine-based therapy in Europe and the US. However, the inherent limitations of modelling studies reinforce the need for randomised prospective trials, preferably conducted in a general practice setting and including a quality-of-life analysis. Of the currently accepted approaches for the long term management of recurrent duodenal ulcer disease, daily maintenance therapy with ranitidine has been shown to be more cost effective than intermittent treatment for up to 2 years in the US. The annual cost of providing continuous maintenance therapy with ranitidine 150 mg/day is higher than with cimetidine 400 mg/day, although the extra benefits include a reduced risk of pain and discomfort from an expected lower rate of ulcer recurrence with ranitidine. Simultaneous ulcer healing and eradication of H. pylori markedly reduces relapse rates and is likely to become the management strategy of choice in H. pylori-positive patients, particularly with the advent of more convenient, well tolerated and effective regimens. Moreover, widespread clinical acceptance of H. pylori eradication may yield substantial cost savings to society by reducing the overall need for long term antisecretory therapy. Nonetheless, maintenance therapy with histamine H 2-receptor antagonists remains indicated for patients at high risk of ulcer recurrence who are poorly responsive to or cannot tolerate H. pylori eradication regimens. In summary, the proven efficacy and tolerability of ranitidine will ensure its continued use in the treatment of many patients with duodenal ulcer and mild to moderate reflux oesophagitis. However, there is increasing clinical and economic data favouring the selection of omeprazole in patients with more severe symptoms of these diseases.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Variability in individual response to various doses of omeprazole. Implications for antiulcer therapy

This study was carried out in order to perform a combined prospective assessment of the individual pharmacodynamic response and of duodenal ulcer healing in patients treated with three different doses of omeprazole. Ninety-nine patients with endoscopically proven duodenal ulcers were subdivided into three parallel groups of 33 cases, who were randomly assigned to receive orally at 0800 hr, in single blind fashion, either 10 mg, 20 mg, or 40 mg of omeprazole. All of them underwent continuous intragastric pH monitoring both in basal conditions and on the fifth day of each dose regimen; ulcer healing was then assessed endoscopically after four weeks of treatment. All three doses of omeprazole caused pH values to increase significantly (P < 0.001) over the whole 24-hr period. In patients treated with omeprazole 10 mg, the individual responses showed the highest variability: the acid inhibition, expressed in terms of time spent above pH 3.0, lasted for more than 16 hr in 42% of cases, for more than 8 hr in 28%, and for less than 6 hr in 30%. In patients treated with omeprazole 20 mg, the pharmacological response was more marked and uniform and lasted for more than 16 hr in 79% of cases; however, it is worth noting it lasted for less than 6 hr in three patients (10%). In patients treated with omeprazole 40 mg, the individual response was excellent (more than 16 hr) in 94% of cases, and it lasted for less than 6 hr in only one patient (3%).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Markers of slow-healing peptic ulcer in the elderly. A study on 1,052 ranitidine-treated patients

Little is known about ulcer outcome in the elderly. The aims of the present paper were to establish whether risk factors of slow-healing peptic ulcer can be demonstrated in the elderly and whether clinical differences exist between ulcer patients whose age of onset of the disease was before or after 65 years old. The short-term, open study, involving 1052 elderly patients (over 65 years) in 37 gastroenterology centers throughout Italy aimed to compare two schedules of ranitidine treatment: 150 mg twice daily versus 300 mg at bedtime. As nonsignificant differences were found between these two schedules, the sample was considered as a whole. It included 319 gastric ulcer (GU) patients, 699 duodenal ulcer (DU) patients, and 34 concomitant GU and DU cases. Ninety-three patients dropped out of the trial; 79/294 GU, 138/635 DU, and 10/30 GU+DU were found still unhealed after four weeks and 20 GU, 15 DU, and 1 GU+DU remained so after eight weeks. Statistical analysis was performed using likelihood-ratio and Pearson's chi-squared tests and Cox's models. Univariate analysis showed that the indicators of slow-healing GU were ulcer size (P = 0.002) and persisting ulcer symptoms (P = 0.0001); indicators of slow-healing DU were ulcer size (P = 0.0001), persisting ulcer symptoms (P = 0.0001), alcohol (P = 0.0003), and NSAID (P = 0.0088) consumption. DU patients taking antiplatelet drugs have significantly better results after four weeks and worse results after eight weeks (P = 0.0352).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Effect of lansoprazole on intragastric pH. Comparison between morning and evening dosing

Lansoprazole is a newly developed proton pump inhibitor. The purpose of this study was to determine whether morning or evening dosage gave better control of 24-hr intragastric pH. In this study, we examined the antisecretory effect of lansoprazole by repeated intragastric pH monitoring on four occasions in eight normal subjects and compared median 24-hr pH values and pH threshold time of pH greater than or equal to 4 between morning and evening dosing, following the administration of lansoprazole 30 mg once daily in either the morning or evening for seven days. Intragastric pH was monitored before and after seven days of treatment. Both morning and evening dosing caused a rise in the intragastric pH. Median pH for 24 hr was 4.3 and 1.6 with and without lansoprazole morning dosing and 4.6 and 2.1 for evening dosing, respectively. The pH threshold curve shifted to the right with lansoprazole treatment in either case. However, no differences were found between morning and evening dosing in terms of median 24-hr pH values or pH threshold time of pH greater than or equal to 4. These results indicate that lansoprazole can be given once daily in either the morning or evening because of its potent and long-lasting antisecretory activity.

Bismuth subsalicylate in the treatment of H2 blocker resistant duodenal ulcers: role of Helicobacter pylori

Fifty nine patients with Helicobacter pylori positive duodenal ulcers that failed to heal after a six week course of treatment with H2 blockers were randomly assigned to one of the following three regimens: (i) bismuth subsalicylate, 600 mg three times daily (n = 19), (ii) ranitidine, 300 mg at night (n = 20), (iii) bismuth subsalicylate plus ranitidine (n = 20). Cumulative ulcer healing rates after four and eight weeks respectively were as follows: bismuth subsalicylate 74% (14/19) and 95% (18/19), ranitidine 40% (8/20) and 65% (13/20), bismuth subsalicylate plus ranitidine 80% (16/20) and 95% (19/20). Bismuth subsalicylate treatment was better than ranitidine at both four and at eight weeks (p less than 0.05). The clearance rates for H pylori after four weeks were: bismuth subsubsalicylate 58%, ranitidine 0%, bismuth subsalicylate plus ranitidine 55%. After stopping bismuth therapy bacterial recrudescence frequently occurred. After bismuth treatment 86% (19/22) of ulcers had healed if H pylori had been cleared, whereas only 65% (11/17) had healed if H pylori persisted (NS). This study shows that bismuth subsalicylate is more effective in the treatment of resistant duodenal ulcers than standard dose ranitidine. It may be that suppression of H pylori by bismuth subsalicylate promotes ulcer healing.

Omeprazole. An updated review of its pharmacology and therapeutic use in acid-related disorders

Omeprazole is the first of a new class of drugs, the acid pump inhibitors, which control gastric acid secretion at the final stage of the acid secretory pathway and thus reduce basal and stimulated acid secretion irrespective of the stimulus. In patients with duodenal or gastric ulcers, omeprazole as a single 20 mg daily dose provides more rapid and complete healing compared with ranitidine 150 mg twice daily or 300 mg at nighttime, or cimetidine 800 or 1000 mg/day. Patients poorly responsive to treatment with histamine H2-receptor antagonists respond well to omeprazole--most ulcers healed within 4 to 8 weeks of omeprazole 40 mg/day therapy. Omeprazole 20 or 40 mg/day has been administered as maintenance therapy for peptic ulcer disease for up to 5.5 years with very few ulcer recurrences. In patients with erosive or ulcerative oesophagitis, omeprazole 20 or 40 mg/day produces healing in about 80% of patients after 4 weeks, and is superior to ranitidine with respect to both healing and symptom relief. Healing rates of greater than 80% are achieved after 8 weeks in patients with severe reflux oesophagitis unresponsive to H2-receptor antagonists. Maintenance therapy with a daily 20 mg dose prevents relapse in about 80% of patients over a 12-month period. Omeprazole is considered to be the best pharmacological option for controlling gastric acid secretion in patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. Daily dosages of 20 to 360 (median 60 to 70 mg successfully reduce basal acid output to target levels (less than 10 mmol/h or less than 5 mmol/h in patients with severe oesophagitis or partial gastrectomy) during treatment for up to 4 years. Omeprazole is well tolerated in short term studies (up to 12 weeks); the reported incidence of serious side effects (about 1%) being similar to that seen in patients treated with an histamine H2-receptor antagonist. The longer term tolerability of omeprazole has been investigated in patients treated for up to 5.5 years. Slight hyperplasia, but no evidence of enterochromaffin-like (ECL) cell dysplasia or neoplasia or ECL cell carcinoids has been reported. ECL cell carcinoids have been observed in rats after life-long treatment with high doses of omeprazole or ranitidine, or in rats with partial corpectomy; the weight of experimental evidence indicates that this is a result of prolonged hypergastrinaemia.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Treatment of refractory peptic ulcer with omeprazole or continued H2 receptor antagonists: a controlled clinical trial

We tested the hypothesis that the gastric H+/K+ adenosine triphosphatase inhibitor, omeprazole, because of its different mode of action and pronounced inhibitory effect on gastric acid secretion, may be more effective in peptic ulcer that is refractory to histamine H2 receptor antagonist treatment than continuing the same therapy. Altogether 107 patients (duodenal ulcer, n = 88; prepyloric ulcer, n = 14; gastric ulcer, n = 3; mixed sites, n = 2) with refractory peptic ulcer - that is ulcer unhealed after at least two months' treatment with cimetidine 0.8 g or 1 g daily or with ranitidine 0.3 g daily - were randomly allocated to receive either omeprazole 40 mg daily (n = 54) or to continue treatment with the same H2 receptor antagonist and at the same dose (n = 53) for up to eight weeks. The patients in the two treatment groups were well matched demographically. Healing by 'intent to treat' analysis was as follows: at four weeks, omeprazole 46 of 54 (85%), H2 receptor antagonist 18 of 53 (34%) (p less than 0.0001); and at eight weeks, 52 of 54 (96%) and 30 of 53 (57%) respectively (p less than 0.0001). One patient was lost to follow up but of the 22 patients whose ulcers were shown to be unhealed at endoscopy after receiving continued H2 receptor antagonist treatment, 21 healed in four to eight weeks when changed to omeprazole. Daytime epigastric pain cleared at four weeks in 43 of 47 (91%) patients on omeprazole and in 32 of 46 (70%) on H2 receptor antagonists (p=0.01) and relief of all dyspeptic symptoms occurred in 39 of 47 (83%) and 23 of 45 (51%) (p=0.0009) patients respectively. Adverse events occurred in 11 of 54 (20%) patients on omeprazole and in 12 of 35 (34%) on cimetidine but in none on ranitidine. The events were mild and none required treatment withdrawal. The commonest event in patients on omeprazole was loose stools or diarrhoea (n=5). Omeprazole was significantly better than continued H2 receptor antagonist treatment for the short term management of refractory peptic ulcer as judged by healing rate and pain relief, and it was safe.

Omeprazole and ranitidine in duodenal ulcer healing. Analysis of comparative clinical trials

Ten double-blind randomized studies with omeprazole versus ranitidine in duodenal ulcer healing have been published. The total number of patients in the trials amounted to 2225. To detect treatment differences, a meta-analysis was performed. After 2 and 4 weeks of treatment results have been evaluated. After 2 weeks of treatment omeprazole produced higher healing rates than ranitidine in nine studies. However, at 4 weeks numerical differences in favour of omeprazole were found in nine studies. Relief of ulcer symptoms occurred more rapidly with omeprazole than ranitidine. No major clinical or biochemical side effects were recorded. However, no data are available about maintenance therapy in double-blind randomized studies comparing both drugs or about rebleeding rates in bleeding duodenal ulcer treatment.