Treatment of refractory peptic ulcer with omeprazole or continued H2 receptor antagonists: a controlled clinical trial

Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of Proton Pump Inhibitors and Histamine-2 Receptor Antagonists in the Management of Patients With Peptic Ulcer Disease: A Systematic Review

Peptic ulcer disease (PUD) refers to the occurrence of an open erosion in the inner lining of the stomach, duodenum, or sometimes lower esophagus. Treatments like proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) or histamine 2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs) are available on the market to efficiently treat the break in the mucosal lining. However, there is little evidence about the effects of the medication on the type and location of the ulcer and the epigastric pain caused by disintegration and increased acidity in the stomach. Given the above, we conducted a systematic review comparing the safety and efficacy of PPIs and H2RAs in various ulcer locations (gastric, duodenal, and pre-pyloric) and the effect of prolonging the treatment with the same medication or changing into a drug from another class in treatment-resistant ulcers. We employed major research literature databases and search engines such as PubMed, Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), Science Direct, and Google Scholar to find relevant articles. After a thorough screening, a quality check using various tools, and applying filters that suited our eligibility criteria, we identified eight articles, of which five were random clinical trials (RCTs), two review articles, and one meta-analysis. This study compares the different side effects of PPIs and H2RAs. Most studies concluded that omeprazole is superior in healing ulcers and bringing pain relief and that patients resistant to H2RAs can be treated better when switched to a PPI. This study also discusses the adverse effects of chronic use, such as diarrhea, constipation, headaches, and gastrointestinal infections. Patients on long-term PPI therapy are required to take calcium supplements to prevent the risk of fractures in older adults. Regarding long-term outcomes, PPIs remain the mainstay of treatment for peptic ulcer disease, based on the papers we reviewed.

Proton pump inhibitors and hypomagnesemia: A meta-analysis of observational studies

BACKGROUND

Previous meta-analyses have suggested that there might be an association between the use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and the development of hypomagnesemia, although the conclusions were no definitive.

METHODS

To provide an update on this topic, we performed a meta-analysis of all observational studies that examined the association between the use of PPIs and the development of hypomagnesemia. A literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, Scopus and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (January 1970 to June 2018) to identify observational studies that examined the association between the use of PPIs and the incidence and prevalence of hypomagnesemia.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

In the absence of randomized controlled trials, we focused primarily on observational studies, including cross-sectional, case-control, retrospective, and prospective cohort studies. There was no limitation on sample size or study duration. Random-effect models meta-analyses were used to compute pooled unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for binary variables.

RESULTS

Sixteen observational studies were identified, including 13 cross-sectional studies, 2 case-control studies, and 1 cohort study, with a total of 131,507 patients. The pooled percentage of PPI users was 43.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 25.0%, 64.0%). Among PPI users, 19.4% (95% CI 13.8%, 26.5%) had hypomagnesemia compared to 13.5% (95% CI 7.9%, 22.2%) among nonusers. By meta-analysis, PPI use was significantly associated with hypomagnesemia, with a pooled unadjusted OR of 1.83 (95% CI 1.26, 2.67; P = .002) and a pooled adjusted OR of 1.71 (95% CI 1.33, 2.19; P < .001). In subgroup analyses, high-dose PPI use was associated with higher odds for hypomagnesemia relative to low-dose PPI use (pooled adjusted OR 2.13; 95% CI 1.26, 3.59; P = .005).

CONCLUSION

Our findings are in support of the results of the previous meta-analyses. Furthermore, we found a dose-response between the PPI use and development of hypomagnesemia.

Is there any acid peptic disease that is refractory to proton pump inhibitors?

Non-healing and delayed healing during acid inhibition treatment depend on the extent to which acid and 'non-acid' factors are causative in the particular acid peptic disease, and on the effectiveness and duration of acid suppression. Refractoriness (defined arbitrarily) occurs less often with proton pump inhibitors than with H2-receptor antagonists as the former decrease acid more effectively; H2-receptor antagonist-refractory disease usually responds to treatment with proton pump inhibitors. In Rotherham, 5-10% of duodenal ulcer and gastric ulcer patients are refractory (not healed after > or = 3 months of standard-dose H2-receptor antagonist). In patients with oesophagitis 15% are refractory to high-dose H2-receptor antagonist (for example, 3.2 g cimetidine daily) and 5% to standard-dose proton pump inhibitors (for example, 20 mg omeprazole daily). In controlled clinical trials of patients with refractory duodenal ulcer, healing at 8 weeks with 40 mg omeprazole o.m. vs. continued standard-dose H2-receptor antagonist was 98% vs. 60%; and with 40 mg omeprazole vs. continued high-dose H2-receptor antagonist (2 g + 3 g cimetidine, that is, ultra-refractory disease) was 92% vs. 67%. After healing, in open studies, relapse with maintenance 400-800 mg cimetidine nocte was 45-69% at one year, but 0% with 40 mg omeprazole administered for up to 6.5 years. For 53 patients with refractory gastric ulcer, in an open study, healing with omeprazole 40 mg o.m. occurred in 94% at 8 weeks, and none relapsed on long-term maintenance treatment at this dose. In controlled trials of patients with refractory oesophagitis, healing at 12 weeks with 40 mg omeprazole o.m. vs. high-dose ranitidine (300 mg b.d.) was 90% vs. 47%, and with maintenance 20 mg omeprazole o.m. vs. 150 mg ranitidine b.d., relapse at 1 year was 32% vs. 88%. In conclusion, acid peptic disease refractory to H2-receptor antagonists is uncommon and treatment with proton pump inhibitors is effective. Refractoriness to proton pump inhibitors is rare.

Omeprazole-induced hepatitis

Omeprazole; the first proton pump inhibitor (PPI) showing an effective acid inhibitory ability, provides the satisfactory therapy either in gastro-esophageal reflux symptom relief or in healing of erosive esophagitis. It's also effective in peptic ulcer disease. Up to date, omeprazole efficacy and safety are well established in many trials. Omeprazole-related hepatotoxicity is not very well recognized especially in pediatric population. We report a child who developed hepatitis following omeprazole intake. We believe that this is the first case report of omeprazole-induced hepatitis in pediatric population.

History in our lifetime: the changing nature of refractory duodenal ulcer in the era of histamine H2 receptor antagonists

BACKGROUND AND AIM

This prospective cohort observational study, set in a district hospital, presents our experience (1976-1993) of duodenal ulcer refractory to histamine H2 receptor antagonists (defined as not healed after 3 months' treatment) and comments on onset, outcome and spontaneous decline.

METHODS

Patients were treated mainly with cimetidine, the dose being titrated (up to 3.2 g daily) according to response, and followed by serial check endoscopy and clinical assessment.

RESULTS

A total of 782 of the 4032 duodenal ulcer patients seen (19%) were refractory; the incidence declined over time: 1976-1978: 124/379 (33%); 1979-1983: 390/1240 (31%); 1984-1988: 190/1295 (15%); 1989-1993: 78/1118 (7%). A total of 344 were refractory for the first time on their first healing course and 174 on their second. Healing was achieved in two-thirds after a mean of 7 months' treatment with cimetidine 1 g; treatment for 12-18 months with higher doses was needed in the remainder. Relapse occurred in up to three-quarters of patients despite maintenance cimetidine up to 3 g daily. Eventually 47 patients were operated upon but good results (i.e., no ulcer, no symptoms) were achieved in only 11.

CONCLUSION

Refractoriness was common until recently. Its incidence has declined dramatically, the fall preceding the newer more powerful treatment with proton pump inhibitors and with Helicobacter pylori eradication. We suggest this phenomenon is a modern example of a spontaneous change in the natural history of the disease.

A comparative study on the activity of lansoprazole, omeprazole and PD-136450 on acidified ethanol- and indomethacin-induced gastric lesions in the rat

1. The proton pump inhibitors lansoprazole (LP) and omeprazole (OP) and the cholecystokinin (CCK)-receptor antagonist PD-136450 (PD) provide a broad spectrum of activities in their ability to inhibit gastric acid secretion and protect the stomach against ulcerogens. In the present study, we investigated the protective effects of these compounds against gastric ulcers induced by acidified ethanol (AE) and indomethacin. 2. Both AE (60% ethanol in 150 mmol/L HCl, 1 mL/rat) and indomethacin (30 mg/kg) produced gastric haemorrhagic lesions in the rat 1 and 6 h after oral administration, respectively. 3. The gastric mucosal protective effects of LP (1-20 mg/kg), OP (0.5-10 mg/kg) and PD (1-20 mg/kg), administered either orally or subcutaneously (s.c.) 30 min before the administration of AE or indomethacin, were dose dependent against both models of ulcer induction. 4. To determine whether the cytoprotective effect of LP, OP and PD (each 10 mg/kg) was mediated by endogenous prostaglandins (PG), indomethacin (10 mg/kg, s.c.) was administered 15 min before AE to inhibit prostanoids biosynthesis. Indomethacin reduced the cytoprotective effects of OP, but not LP, administered either orally or s.c. Indomethacin reduced the cytoprotective effect of PD administered orally, although the effect was much less significant than when PD was administered s.c. The results exclude the role of PG in mediating the protective effects of LP, whereas the possibility exists for PG to have a role in mediating the protective effects of OP and PD. 5. To investigate the possible involvement of endogenous nitric oxide (NO) in the cytoprotective action of LP, OP and PD, we treated rats with a selective inhibitor of NO synthesis, namely NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME; 25 mg/kg, s.c.). Administration of L-NAME 15 min prior to LP, OP or PD (each 10 mg/kg) orally or s.c. and challenge with AE or indomethacin did not significantly increase the degree of the ulcer index and L-NAME was not able to antagonize the protective effects of LP, OP and PD, thus excluding the role of NO in mediating the protective effects of these drugs. However, the effects of PD in reducing the indomethacin-induced ulcer index were less significant in the presence than the absence of L-NAME (P < 0.05 vs P < 0.001, respectively), suggesting a role for NO. 6. In conclusion, the results of the present study suggest that LP and OP are equally effective against AE- as well as indomethacin-induced gastric ulcers and were more potent than PD in protecting the stomach against ulcer formation. Lansoprazole, OP and PD bring about their cytoprotective action through the reduction of acid secretion and some other unknown mechanisms. However, OP and PD may exert their cytoprotective action through PG and NO pathways.

Long-term omeprazole treatment in resistant gastroesophageal reflux disease: efficacy, safety, and influence on gastric mucosa

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The efficacy and safety of long-term acid suppression remains a subject for debate. We report data from patients with refractory reflux esophagitis who were undergoing maintenance therapy with >/=20 mg omeprazole daily for a mean period of 6.5 years (range, 1.4-11.2 years).

METHODS

Patients with severe reflux esophagitis resistant to long-term therapy with H(2)-receptor antagonists and who were not eligible for surgery were evaluated at least annually for endoscopic relapse and histological changes in the gastric corpus.

RESULTS

In 230 patients (mean age, 63 years at entry; 36% were >/=70 years), there were 158 relapses of esophagitis during 1490 treatment years (1 per 9.4 years), with no significant difference in relapse rates between Helicobacter pylori-positive and -negative patients. All patients rehealed during continued therapy with omeprazole at the same or higher dose. The annual incidence of gastric corpus mucosal atrophy was 4.7% and 0.7% in H. pylori-positive and -negative patients, respectively, which was mainly observed in elderly patients who had moderate/severe gastritis at entry. In patients with baseline moderate/severe gastritis, the incidences were similar: 7.9% and 8.4%, respectively. Corpus intestinal metaplasia was rare, and no dysplasia or neoplasms were observed. The adverse event profile was as might be expected from this elderly group of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term omeprazole therapy (up to 11 years) is highly effective and safe for control of reflux esophagitis.

Proton pump inhibitors. Pharmacology and rationale for use in gastrointestinal disorders

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are drugs which irreversibly inhibit proton pump (H+/K+ ATPase) function and are the most potent gastric acid-suppressing agents in clinical use. There is now a substantial body of evidence showing improved efficacy of PPIs over the histamine H2 receptor antagonists and other drugs in acid-related disorders. Omeprazole 20 mg/day, lansoprazole 30 mg/day, pantoprazole 40 mg/day or rabeprazole 20 mg/day for 2 to 4 weeks are more effective than standard doses of H2-receptor antagonists in healing duodenal and gastric ulcers. Patients with gastric ulcers should receive standard doses of PPIs as for duodenal ulcers but for a longer time period (4 to 8 weeks). There is no conclusive evidence to support the use of a particular PPI over another for either duodenal or gastric ulcer healing. For Helicobacter pylori-positive duodenal ulceration, a combination of a PPI and 2 antibacterials will eradicate H. pylori in over 90% of cases and significantly reduce ulcer recurrence. Patients with H. pylori-positive gastric ulcers should be managed similarly. PPIs also have efficacy advantages over ranitidine and misoprostol and are better tolerated than misoprostol in patients taking nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). In endoscopically proven gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, standard daily doses of the PPIs are more effective than H2-receptor antagonists for healing, and patients should receive a 4 to 8 week course of treatment. For severe reflux, with ulceration and/or stricture formation, a higher dose regimen (omeprazole 40 mg, lansoprazole 60 mg, pantoprazole 80 mg or rabeprazole 40 mg daily) appears to yield better healing rates. There is little evidence that PPIs lead to resolution of Barrett's oesophagus or a reduction of subsequent adenocarcinoma development, but PPIs are indicated in healing of any associated ulceration. In Zollinger-Ellison syndrome, PPIs have become the treatment of choice for the management of gastric acid hypersecretion.

A Comparison of Retrospective and Concurrent Drug Utilization Review of Omeprazole

Objective:

To compare the appropriateness of omeprazole prescriptions in a concurrent drug utilization review (DUR) with the assessed appropriateness of a retrospective DUR.

Methods:

A retrospective DUR of omeprazole was conducted on prescriptions written from August 23, 1993, to October 8, 1993, in a 340-bed university hospital. This DUR served as a baseline for a concurrent DUR that began on January 27, 1995, and ended on March 16, 1995. The concurrent DUR integrated three steps aimed at improving the quality of omeprazole use: Approval of the criteria by the pharmacology and therapeutics committee of the hospital, distribution of a drug bulletin to all physicians, and a pharmacist's verbal recommendations to physicians whose prescriptions did not meet explicit criteria.

Results:

Twenty-nine and 64 prescriptions were reviewed in the retrospective and concurrent DURs, respectively. During the concurrent DUR, the pharmacist made 34 verbal recommendations. Of these, 25 (74%) were agreed to by the prescribers. In comparison with the retrospective DUR, the percentage of prescriptions meeting the criteria of indication, combination therapy, and dosage went from 38% to 75% (p < 0.05), from 76% to 95% (p < 0.05), and from 83% to 100% (p > 0.05), respectively, during the concurrent DUR.

Conclusions:

The concurrent DUR appeared to successfully improve the quality of omeprazole utilization in the hospital.

Thoracoscopic vagotomy for recurrent ulcer after previous gastric operation

BACKGROUND

Recurrent peptic ulcer after previous gastric operation is a difficult surgical problem and abdominal re-operation is associated with significant morbidity, mortality and recurrence rate.

METHODS

The authors report on five patients with recurrent ulcers who, after previous gastric operation, were treated with thoracoscopic vagotomy.

RESULTS

All patients tolerated the procedure well without complications, and the median hospital stay was 5 days. Endoscopy confirmed healing of the ulcers in all patients. Pre-operative and postoperative gastric acid studies showed a significant postoperative reduction in both basal and maximal acid output (P < 0.05). In a follow-up period of 18-33 months, one patient had a recurrent ulcer presenting with bleeding. Gastric biopsy revealed presence of Helicobacter pylori and repeated gastroscopy after a course of H. pylori eradication treatment showed a healed ulcer. The other four patients were asymptomatic.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that thoracoscopic vagotomy is a simple and safe procedure for the treatment of recurrent ulcers after previous gastric operation, but the long-term results need further assessment.

Rheumatoid arthritis: new approaches for its evaluation and management

Rheumatoid arthritis is a chronic, progressive disease with a long-term outcome characterized by significant morbidity, loss of functional capacity, and increased mortality. The cornerstone of therapy includes the appropriate melding of pharmacological, rehabilitative, and surgical treatments. New developments in the care of patients with rheumatoid arthritis have focused on aggressive pharmacological therapy early in the course of the illness, ongoing assessment of disease activity and patient function, and a better understanding of the role of rehabilitative techniques such as therapeutic exercise and behavioral approaches to education. This article synthesizes information from studies on recent advances in the management of rheumatoid arthritis outlining diagnosis and assessment, disability issues, outcome studies, current status of traditional and experimental pharmacological therapies, and new strategies of nonpharmacological treatments aimed at the clinician challenged by this fascinating disorder.

Influence of initial therapy on outcome of peptic ulcer

Histamine 2 (H2) receptor antagonists, proton pump inhibitors, prostaglandin analogues, colloidal bismuth and sucralfate have all proved safe and effective in the initial treatment of peptic ulcer. Yet, most ulcers will recur when treatment is stopped. Continuous maintenance with H2 antagonists results in low symptomatic relapse, complications occur rarely, and such treatment is safe. An alternative is Symptomatic Self Care (on-demand therapy), which provides an economic option for patients with no concomitant disease or previous complications. Meta-analyses suggest a higher relapse rate after H2 antagonist therapy than that following sucralfate or bismuth. Whilst improved morphology and/or functional status of the gastro-duodenal mucosa ('quality of healing') has been claimed, the difference has not been explained. Successful prolonged eradication of Helicobacter pylori leads to a very low relapse rate, but more effective, predictable and safer eradication regimens are needed.

Long term treatment with omeprazole 20 mg three days a week or 10 mg daily in the prevention of duodenal ulcer relapse

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to compare omeprazole 10 mg o.m. (daily) with omeprazole 20 mg o.m. on Friday to Sunday inclusive (weekend) in the prevention of duodenal ulcer relapse over a 6-month period.

METHODS

After an open healing phase (4 to 8 weeks) with omeprazole 20 mg o.m., 81 patients entered the follow-up phase. Forty-two were randomized in a double-blind double-dummy technique, to omeprazole 10 mg o.m., and 39 to omeprazole 20 mg at weekends. At 3 and 6 months or on symptomatic relapse the patients underwent endoscopy with gastric biopsies (quantitative assessment of argyrophilic and gastrin cells), symptom evaluation, and laboratory screening with fasting serum gastrin.

RESULTS

Five patients in the 10 mg group and four in the weekend group were lost to follow-up. The estimated relapse rates over six months in the two groups receiving 10 mg daily or 20 mg at weekends were 19% and 31%, respectively (95% CI of percentage difference: -33% to 8%: intention-to-treat analysis, P = N.S.). During the follow-up phase, symptoms tended to be milder in the omeprazole 10 mg daily group compared to the weekend group. Gastrin levels increased significantly during the healing phase but then stayed almost constant in the omeprazole 10 mg group, and significantly decreased with weekend treatment. The median number of argyrophilic cells showed a slight but statistically significant increase in the omeprazole 10 mg daily group, but did not change in the weekend group. Both the healing and long-term therapies were well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data do not show a clear difference between the two treatment regimens, but there was a tendency towards a lower recurrence rate with omeprazole 10 mg daily compared with 20 mg weekend therapy.

Health Maintenance Organization Drug Education Pharmacists' Influence on Acid Gastric Drug Prescribing and Costs

With health care reform came the advent of cost-conscious prescribing. Many measures contributed to this, including formulary control, physician education, and clinical pharmacy. Initial efforts in this regard were limited to the in-patient setting, but as health care reform continued, the significance of cost-effective prescribing in the ambulatory care setting has evolved. This article provides a brief historical look at cost-effective prescribing and how the efforts of a clinical pharmacist have successfully influenced the prescribing patterns for the acid-gastric products, and reduced expenditures in a Northern California health maintenance organization (HMO) medical center.

Formulary management of antiulcer drugs: clinical considerations

Peptic ulcer disease (PUD) is thought to result from an imbalance between aggressive (excessive) {especially gastric acid and pepsin} and protective (diminished) factors (gastric mucus and bicarbonate, prostaglandins and others) in the stomach. Recent attention has focused on the role of Helicobacter pylori as a cause of chronic active gastritis and a pathogenic factor in PUD. Antiulcer medications with proven efficacy in the treatment of acute PUD include histamine 2 (H 2)-receptor antagonists, H +/K +-ATPase (proton pump) inhibitors, antacids, sucralfate and prostaglandin analogues. The advent of proton pump inhibitors in particular has resulted in effective therapy for ulcers that previously would have been considered refractory. H 2-receptor antagonists and sucralfate are also useful for maintenance therapy of PUD. Recent interest has focused on strategies aimed at eradicating H. pylori and the ensuing change in the natural history of PUD, specifically a marked decrease in ulcer recurrence. In contrast, with standard treatment regimens there is a high rate of ulcer relapse (50 to 90%) after acute ulcer healing. Eradication of H. pylori has until now required a triple drug regimen of bismuth and 2 antibiotics, and is too cumbersome for routine use. It is likely, however, that treatment aimed at eradicating H. pylori will be routine in the near future and will represent a cost-effective alternative to standard long term maintenance therapy.

A double-blind, randomized, parallel group study of omeprazole and ranitidine in Korean patients with gastric ulcer

The efficacy of the proton pump inhibitor omeprazole, 20 mg every morning, was compared with that of the H2-receptor antagonist ranitidine, 150 mg every morning and at bedtime, in a double-blind randomized parallel group study in 250 patients with gastric or prepyloric ulcers. At both 4 and 8 weeks, significantly more patients had healed ulcers in the omeprazole group than the ranitidine group, whether the results were analysed on a per-protocol or an intention-to-treat basis. At 4 weeks, 74% of patients in the omeprazole group were healed compared with 51% in the ranitidine group (P = 0.001), and at 8 weeks the corresponding values were 99 and 82% (P = 0.001, per-protocol cohort). Omeprazole treatment and small ulcer size significantly increased the probability of healing, but smoking had no significant effect. Patients in the omeprazole group had significantly fewer occurrences of daytime epigastric pain during the first 4 weeks than the ranitidine group (P = 0.0037), as shown by their diary cards. Both treatments were well tolerated.

Peptic ulcer disease: an update

Peptic ulcers can develop when there is an imbalance between gastric acid secretion and gastroduodenal mucosal defense. Investigators are looking at the role of Helicobacter pylori in the development of peptic ulcer disease; eradication of the microorganism may reduce recurrence. Approved drug therapy includes H2-receptor antagonists, omeprazole, sucralfate, and antacids. Recommendations for treating and counseling patients are provided.

Omeprazole: a pharmacoeconomic evaluation of its use in duodenal ulcer and reflux oesophagitis

Omeprazole regulates gastric acid secretion and is an effective treatment of acute duodenal ulcer and reflux oesophagitis, achieving more rapid healing and symptomatic relief than histamine H 2-receptor antagonists. When administered as maintenance therapy, omeprazole reduces the incidence of relapse. The drug is also highly effective in patients poorly responsive to histamine H 2-receptor antagonists. The daily acquisition cost of omeprazole is higher than that of histamine H 2-receptor antagonists in many countries, and thus it is important to evaluate the pharmacoeconomic impact of omeprazole in the short and long term treatment of duodenal ulcer and reflux oesophagitis. Pharmacoeconomic analyses have been performed in several clinical settings using pooled data from clinical trials or simulated models of clinical practice. In a single analysis using Finnish cost data, omeprazole was more cost effective than ranitidine in the treatment of duodenal ulcer disease over a 6-month period. The cost effectiveness of omeprazole was comparable to that of sucralfate-containing regimens, with patients receiving omeprazole being healed more quickly and experiencing a greater number of healthy days. Using a computer-model simulation and Swedish cost data, omeprazole was more cost effective than ranitidine when administered as intermittent treatment of duodenal ulcer over 5 years. Preliminary reports indicate that regimens which eradicate Helicobacter pylori are more cost effective than those which do not. As short term treatment of reflux oesophagitis, omeprazole 20 to 40 mg/day was the dominating treatment strategy, being less costly and more effective than ranitidine 300 to 1200 mg/day. Omeprazole 20 mg/day produced symptom-free days more cost effectively than either cimetidine 1.6 g/day or ranitidine 300 mg/day. More importantly, as long term (maintenance or intermittent) treatment of reflux oesophagitis, omeprazole 20 mg/day was more cost effective than both ranitidine 150 mg twice daily and 'phase 1' therapy (diet and antacids) over 6 and 12 months. Thus, based on analyses evaluated, omeprazole appears to be more cost effective than ranitidine in the short term treatment of duodenal ulcer. Results for long term treatment are less clear cut, but full details from some studies are not yet available. For the short term treatment of reflux oesophagitis omeprazole is more cost effective than ranitidine or cimetidine and for long term treatment omeprazole is more cost effective than ranitidine. As treatment for reflux oesophagitis, omeprazole is considered to be the dominating treatment strategy.

Quality of healing in peptic ulcer disease--are H2 receptor antagonists all we need?

The rapid relief of symptoms and ulcer healing can now be achieved in most patients with peptic ulcer. Histamine2 (H2) receptor antagonists, proton pump inhibitors, prostaglandin analogues, colloidal bismuth and sucralfate have all proved safe and effective for the initial treatment of peptic ulcer. However, most ulcers will recur when treatment is stopped. Meta-analyses suggest a higher relapse rate after H2 antagonist therapy than that following sucralfate or bismuth. This difference has not been explained although improved morphology and/or functional status of the gastroduodenal mucosa ("quality of healing") has been claimed. Eradication of Helicobacter pylori leads to marked reduction in relapse rate but more effective and safer eradication regimens are needed. Since most ulcers do recur, maintenance therapy with H2 antagonists remains a commonly used option. Continuous maintenance results in low symptomatic relapse, complications occur rarely, and such treatment is safe. An alternative is Symptomatic Self Care (on-demand therapy) which provides an economic option for patients with no concomitant disease or previous complications. Future research should decide the exact role of Helicobacter eradication; but for now, we can still rely on maintenance therapy with the widely-used and proven H2 receptor antagonists.

Short and long term outcome of Helicobacter pylori positive resistant duodenal ulcers treated with colloidal bismuth subcitrate plus antibiotics or sucralfate alone

Thirty two patients with Helicobacter pylori positive duodenal ulcers resistant to treatment were randomly assigned to 4 weeks' treatment with sucralphate 4 g/day or colloidal bismuth subcitrate 480 mg/day plus amoxycillin from days 1 to 7 and tinidazole from days 8 to 14. After 4 weeks, patients with unhealed ulcers were crossed over to the other form of treatment for a further 4 week period. Patients with healed ulcers were followed up for 1 year without maintenance therapy with clinical and endoscopic investigations 3, 6, and 12 months after healing. Complete healing rates at 4 weeks were 88% (15 of 17) in the colloidal bismuth subcitrate plus antibiotics group and 40% (six of 15) in the sucralphate group (p < 0.05). After cross over, overall healing rates were 88% (22 of 25) and 47% (eight of 17), respectively (p < 0.05). H pylori eradication occurred in 83% of patients treated with the triple therapy. Cumulative relapse rates at 12 months were 12% (two of 17) in patients in whom H pylori had been eradicated and 100% (10 of 10) in those with persistent infection after short term therapy (p < 0.05). These results show that a colloidal bismuth subcitrate plus antibiotics regimen is highly effective in the short term treatment of resistant duodenal ulcers and that H pylori eradication can change the natural tendency to early recurrence of these ulcers.

Refractory peptic lesions. Therapeutic strategies for ulcers and reflux esophagitis that resist standard regimens

In some patients, peptic lesions fail to heal after 2 to 3 months of standard histamine2 (H2) receptor antagonist or sucralfate (Carafate) therapy. Noncompliance with prescribed treatment, cigarette smoking, gastric acid hypersecretory states (including Zollinger-Ellison syndrome), Helicobacter pylori infection, the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, abdominal radiation therapy, and malignant tumors are all causes of refractory disease. Treatment options include high-dose H2 receptor antagonist therapy or switching to a more potent drug or one with a different mechanism of action. Occasionally, drug combinations (eg, H2 receptor antagonist plus misoprostol [Cytotec] for gastric ulcers or H2 receptor antagonist plus metoclopramide [Octamide, Reglan] for reflux disease) are effective. Triple-drug therapy for H pylori infection with refractory duodenal ulcers may allow healing and dramatically decrease recurrence rates. When surgery is required, vagotomy and antrectomy is probably the procedure of choice in patients with peptic ulcer disease that is refractory to medical management. Nissen fundoplication is effective in patients with reflux esophagitis who have adequate esophageal motility.

Histamine H2-receptor antagonists in peptic ulcer disease. Efficacy in healing peptic ulcers

Duodenal ulcer healing depends on the degree and length of inhibition of gastric secretion and upon the duration of therapy, while gastric ulcer healing is dependent mainly on the duration of therapy. Currently marketed doses of the histamine H2-receptor antagonists heal between 77 and 92% of duodenal ulcers at 4 weeks, and adjuvant treatment to eradicate Helicobacter pylori increases this rate. Once-daily administration is as effective as more frequent dosing regimens and may even result in higher healing rates. Gastric ulcers heal more slowly, but 75 to 88% of ulcers heal after 8 weeks of treatment. While newer more potent acid suppressors such as omeprazole heal ulcers slightly more quickly, the H2-receptor antagonists have an unparalleled safety record of over 15 years. It is unlikely that the prostaglandin analogues can improve on the efficacy of the H2-receptor antagonists with as low an incidence of side effects.

Omeprazole. An updated review of its pharmacology and therapeutic use in acid-related disorders

Omeprazole is the first of a new class of drugs, the acid pump inhibitors, which control gastric acid secretion at the final stage of the acid secretory pathway and thus reduce basal and stimulated acid secretion irrespective of the stimulus. In patients with duodenal or gastric ulcers, omeprazole as a single 20 mg daily dose provides more rapid and complete healing compared with ranitidine 150 mg twice daily or 300 mg at nighttime, or cimetidine 800 or 1000 mg/day. Patients poorly responsive to treatment with histamine H2-receptor antagonists respond well to omeprazole--most ulcers healed within 4 to 8 weeks of omeprazole 40 mg/day therapy. Omeprazole 20 or 40 mg/day has been administered as maintenance therapy for peptic ulcer disease for up to 5.5 years with very few ulcer recurrences. In patients with erosive or ulcerative oesophagitis, omeprazole 20 or 40 mg/day produces healing in about 80% of patients after 4 weeks, and is superior to ranitidine with respect to both healing and symptom relief. Healing rates of greater than 80% are achieved after 8 weeks in patients with severe reflux oesophagitis unresponsive to H2-receptor antagonists. Maintenance therapy with a daily 20 mg dose prevents relapse in about 80% of patients over a 12-month period. Omeprazole is considered to be the best pharmacological option for controlling gastric acid secretion in patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. Daily dosages of 20 to 360 (median 60 to 70 mg successfully reduce basal acid output to target levels (less than 10 mmol/h or less than 5 mmol/h in patients with severe oesophagitis or partial gastrectomy) during treatment for up to 4 years. Omeprazole is well tolerated in short term studies (up to 12 weeks); the reported incidence of serious side effects (about 1%) being similar to that seen in patients treated with an histamine H2-receptor antagonist. The longer term tolerability of omeprazole has been investigated in patients treated for up to 5.5 years. Slight hyperplasia, but no evidence of enterochromaffin-like (ECL) cell dysplasia or neoplasia or ECL cell carcinoids has been reported. ECL cell carcinoids have been observed in rats after life-long treatment with high doses of omeprazole or ranitidine, or in rats with partial corpectomy; the weight of experimental evidence indicates that this is a result of prolonged hypergastrinaemia.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)