Carotid sinus hypersensitivity in patients presenting with syncope

Carotid sinus hypersensitivity, as a cause of syncope, in a patient with coronary artery disease: A case report

Introduction

Carotid sinus hypersensitivity is one of the unexplained causes of syncope in old age. There are variations in presentations of carotid sinus hypersensitivity.

Case presentation

A 56-year-old male, known case of coronary artery disease, presenting with syncope, was diagnosed as carotid sinus hypersensitivity finally. He was treated with the placement of dual chamber pacemaker.

Clinical discussion

The etiology of unexplained syncope is itself a challenging for clinicians. In the presence of a known risk factor, it is uncommon for carotid sinus hypersensitivity to be present as a cause of syncope.

Conclusions

Hence, the rare disorder like carotid sinus hypersensitivity should also be considered as a cause of syncope despite the presence of co-morbidity like coronary artery disease.

•

Carotid Sinus Hypersensitivity is one of the causes of unexplained syncope in old age.

•

Coronary artery disease is one of the etiological factors in unexplained syncope.

•

Carotid Sinus Hypersensitivity is an uncommon cause of syncope in presence of coronary artery disease.

•

The variations in carotid sinus hypersensitivity should be differentiated and treated accordingly.

Development of a diagnostic protocol for dizziness in elderly patients in general practice: a Delphi procedure

Background

Dizziness in general practice is very common, especially in elderly patients. The empirical evidence for diagnostic tests in the evaluation of dizziness is scarce. Aim of our study was to determine which set of diagnostic tests should be part of a diagnostic protocol for evaluating dizziness in elderly patients in general practice.

Methods

We conducted a Delphi procedure with a panel of 16 national and international experts of all relevant medical specialities in the field of dizziness. A selection of 36 diagnostic tests, based on a systematic review and practice guidelines, was presented to the panel. Each test was described extensively, and data on test characteristics and methodological quality (assessed with the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies, QUADAS) were presented. The threshold for in- or exclusion of a diagnostic test was set at an agreement of 70%.

Results

During three rounds 21 diagnostic tests were selected, concerning patient history (4 items), physical examination (11 items), and additional tests (6 items). Five tests were excluded, although they are recommended by existing practice guidelines on dizziness. Two tests were included, although several practice guidelines question their diagnostic value. Two more tests were included that have never been recommended by practice guidelines on dizziness.

Conclusion

In this study we successfully combined empirical evidence with expert opinion for the development of a set of diagnostic tests for evaluating dizziness in elderly patients. This comprehensive set of tests will be evaluated in a cross-sectional diagnostic study.

How often is dizziness from primary cardiovascular disease true vertigo? A systematic review

OBJECTIVES

To assess how frequently cardiovascular dizziness is vertigo. Recent studies suggest providers do not consider cardiovascular causes when a patient reports true vertigo (spinning/motion) as opposed to presyncope (impending faint). It is known that cardiovascular disease causes dizziness, but unknown how often such dizziness is vertiginous, as opposed to presyncopal.

DATA SOURCES

Systematic review of observational studies was made: Search--electronic (MEDLINE, EMBASE) and manual (references of eligible articles) search for English-language studies (1972-2007).

REVIEW METHODS

Inclusions Studies of >or=5 patients with confirmed cardiovascular causes for dizziness and reporting a proportion with vertigo were included. Two independent reviewers selected studies for inclusion, with differences adjudicated by a third. Study characteristics and dizziness-type proportions were abstracted. Studies were rated on methodology and quality of dizziness definitions. Differences were resolved by consensus.

RESULTS

We identified 1,506 citations, examined 125 full manuscripts, and included 5 studies. Principal reasons for exclusion were: abstracts--lack of original data, no cardiovascular diagnosis, or confounding exposure/disease (74%); manuscripts--failure to distinguish vertigo from other dizziness types (78%). In the three studies not using vertigo as an entry criterion (representing 1,659 patients with myocardial infarction, orthostatic hypotension, or syncope), vertigo was present in 63% (95% CI 57-69%) of cardiovascular patients with dizziness and the only dizziness type in 37% (95% CI 31-43%). Limitations include modest study quality and non-uniform definitions for vertigo.

CONCLUSIONS

Published data suggest that dizziness from primary cardiovascular disease may often be vertigo. Future research should assess prospectively whether dizziness type is a meaningful predictor for or against a cardiovascular diagnosis.

Neurological or cardiological assessment of transient altered consciousness?

Cardiac arrhythmias are a recognized cause of transient alteration of consciousness and unless suspected, a cardiac aetiology for apparent neurological symptoms may be overlooked. We retrospectively assessed the variation in the investigations of 122 patients who were referred to our hospital over a twelve month period for assessment of transient alteration of consciousness and we attempted to identify any factors which might have influenced the clinical outcome for these individuals. Eighteen patients were initially referred for cardiological opinion and 104 for neurological assessment. Sixty-one patients presented with syncope, 43 with seizures, and 18 with presyncope. A baseline electroencephalogram (EEG) was obtained in 104 (85%) and 65 (53%) were also subjected to a stress EEG. Cerebral dysrhythmia was documented in 14 patients. A standard electrocardiogram (ECG) was recorded in only 71 (58%) and sinus bradycardia (heart rate < 60/min) was observed in 34. Twenty-four hour (Holter) ECGs were recorded in only 58 (48%). Ventricular pauses (at least 1.84 seconds) and/or profound bradycardia (heart rate < 40/min) occurred during waking hours in 10 patients and were more likely to be detected in individuals who also exhibited bradycardia on standard ECG (8 patients) (p < 0.05). After six months, 35 (29%) of the 122 patients still lacked a diagnosis and although cerebral dysrhythmia had been diagnosed with equal frequency in the bradycardia and non-bradycardia groups, 21 (62%) of those with bradycardia were still symptomatic compared with 11 (30%) of the non-bradycardia group (p < 0.02). Our findings indicate that, at present, investigation of patients with transient altered consciousness lacks a coordinated approach and bradycardia may influence the diagnosis and morbidity of these individuals. We suggest that greater attention should be paid to possible cardiac causes of transient altered consciousness and that only under joint direction of a cardiologist and a neurologist can efficient and thorough investigation of these patients be realised.

Sympathoinhibition and hypotension in carotid sinus hypersensitivity

Carotid sinus reflex hypersensitivity is a known cause of syncope in humans. The condition is characterized by cardioinhibition and vasodepression, each to varying degrees. The extent and importance of sympathoinhibition has not been determined in patients with carotid sinus hypersensitivity. This study reports on the extent of sympathoinhibition measured directly directly during carotid massage with and without atrioventricular sequential pacing, in a patient with symptomatic carotid sinus reflex hypersensitivity. Carotid massage elicited asystole, hypotension and complete inhibition of muscle sympathetic nerve activity. Carotid massage during atrioventricular pacing produced similar sympathoinhibition, but with minimal hypotension. Therefore, sympathoinhibition did not contribute importantly to the hypotension during carotid massage in the supine position in this patient. Further investigations are required to elucidate the relation of sympathoinhibition to hypotension in patients with carotid sinus hypersensitivity in the upright position.

Syncope

Syncope is a common admitting diagnosis to intensive care units; however, in half the cases, the etiology goes undiagnosed. The prognosis is adversely affected in patients with a cardiogenic etiology. We discuss the clinical presentation and pathophysiology of cardiovascular causes of syncope (including arrhythmia and conduction disturbances, myocardial disorders, and valvular disorders), vascular causes (obstruction and decreased venous return), peripheral vascular causes (arterial and venous), and noncardiovascular causes (neurological and hematological). A thorough history and physical examination are the best diagnostic tools. In addition, electrocardiograms and 24-hour telemetry monitoring are also useful. Other diagnostic tests should be ordered judiciously, depending on the findings of the initial evaluation. Medical or surgical treatment is directed at the underlying cause.

Ventricular and dual chamber pacing for treatment of carotid sinus syndrome

Thirty-nine consecutive patients with recurrent syncope and either cardioinhibitory or mixed type carotid sinus syndrome were studied to determine the efficacy of ventricular (VVI) pacing in 16, and dual chamber (DDD/DVI) in 23 patients. Only those patients affected by the isolated vasodepressor form were excluded. Follow-up lasted 12 +/- 5 months. Symptoms were totally eliminated in 67% of patients and ameliorated with persistence of minor symptoms in 33%. All patients underwent an initial 2-month follow-up in the VVI mode. Evaluation of the 19 patients who remained symptomatic and the 20 who became asymptomatic with VVI pacing demonstrated that factors observed prior to pacemaker implant were related to failure of the VVI mode. These included symptomatic pacemaker effect (42% vs 0%), mixed carotid sinus syndrome (95% vs 65%), orthostatic hypotension (47% vs 15%), or ventriculoatrial conduction (68% vs 38%). In the 23 patients with dual chamber pacing, random 2 month comparisons were performed between VVI and DVI/DDD pacing. The dual chamber mode was preferred by 14 patients, none preferred the VVI mode and nine noted no difference. Comparison of the two groups found that the factors linked to DVI/DDD preference were symptomatic pacemaker effect (50% vs 0%), ventriculoatrial conduction (78% vs 44%), or orthostatic hypotension (50% vs 11%). VVI pacing is efficacious in a high proportion of patients affected by cardioinhibitory or mixed carotid sinus syndrome. The identification of causes of VVI pacing failure allows determination of those who will benefit from VVI pacing and those who should have DVI/DDD. VVI pacing is suggested for the cardioinhibitory type with no symptomatic pacemaker effect and for the mixed type with no symptomatic pacemaker effect or orthostatic hypotension or ventriculoatrial conduction. Dual chamber pacing should be used in all other instances.

Responses to carotid sinus stimulation before and after propranolol

The response to carotid sinus stimulation was studied in nine elderly men (mean age 67) with no history of cardiac disease, dizziness, or syncope. The response to manual carotid sinus pressure (during one of two studies) was positive (an RR interval of greater than 3s) in three men. But seven men showed positive responses after intravenous propranolol (0.1 mg/kg). Similarly, the RR interval was lengthened by greater than 10 ms/mm Hg in two men during neck suction. Neck suction produced a positive result in four men after intravenous propranolol. The detection of hypersensitivity of the carotid sinus in a high proportion of apparently healthy men, especially during beta blockade, suggests that an abnormal response to carotid sinus massage may not be a reliable indicator for pacemaker treatment.

Assessment of VVI diagnostic pacing mode in patients with cardioinhibitory carotid sinus syndrome

In this study, we used Holter pacemakers in a group of 13 patients affected by severe carotid sinus syndrome in order to evaluate its evolution. All the patients had one to three syncopal episodes and frequent other symptoms such as fainting, dizziness, lightheadedness and pre-syncope interferring with their daily activity so that pacemaker therapy was considered necessary. Patient selection criteria were: presence of the isolated cardioinhibitory type, absence of associated sinus dysfunction and absence of symptomatic VVI pacemaker effect. All the patients received a Micropacer 1 device; among special functions, bradycardia events counter was activated and programmed so that each sequence of three consecutive beats at a cycle length 1.5 sec (i.e., 4.5 sec total interval) could be recognized and stored in its memory. The follow-up lasted 13 +/- 7 months. Brady events occurred in eight out of 13 patients (62%), during this period. Syncope and major symptoms disappeared in all the patients; mild dizziness recurred rarely in two patients and were not linked to brady-events recording. In conclusion, disappearance of severe symptoms observed after pacemaker implant in cardioinhibitory carotid sinus syndrome seems to depend from pacing therapy, in most cases, yet from the benign natural course of the disease in some other cases.

Natural and unnatural history of patients with severe carotid sinus hypersensitivity: a preliminary study

Natural history of patients with symptomatic severe carotid sinus hypersensitivity is not clearly known. In order to evaluate the effectiveness of pacing therapy in these patients we performed a randomized treatment/no-treatment prospective study in 35 patients. They were randomly assigned to two groups: 19 patients received no therapy, 16 patients received a VVI (#11) or DDD (#5) pacemaker implant. During the 8.4 +/- 4.3 month follow-up period patients receiving no therapy had recurrence of syncope in 9 cases (47%) and minor symptoms in 13 (68%); at the 16th month, actuarial curve showed absence of syncope in 36% of patients and of any symptoms in 30%. During the 7.2 +/- 4.1 month follow-up period, the patients receiving the pacemaker implant had no recurrence of syncope, minor symptoms in three (19%); at the 16th month, actuarial curve showed absence of syncope in 100% of patients and of any symptoms in 78%. During follow-up, 12 patients in no-treatment group received a pacemaker implant because of the recurrence of severe symptoms; successively they had a strong reduction of symptoms. In conclusion, this study definitively demonstrates that patients with severe symptomatic carotid sinus hypersensitivity had a high rate of recurrence of spontaneous symptoms and that in these patients cardiac pacing is a useful therapy.

Is DDD superior to VVI pacing in mixed carotid sinus syndrome? An acute and medium-term study

The aim of this study was to evaluate the importance of atrial synchronism for pacing therapy of patients with mixed carotid sinus syndrome. In 23 patients (21 m, two f; mean age 69 +/- 8 years) affected by symptomatic mixed carotid sinus syndrome we performed: (1) Research of ventriculo-atrial conduction, orthostatic hypotension and pacemaker effect; and (2) Carotid sinus massage in the standing position during VVI and DVI temporary pacing. Next, all patients received a permanent DDD pacemaker and entered a 2 month two period single-blind, randomized, cross-over study on DVI/DDD versus VVI mode. During the DVI/DDD period, no syncope occurred in any patients, minor symptoms persisted in 11 (48%) of them; during VVI period syncopes recurred in three patients, symptoms requiring the withdrawal of VVI pacing and premature DVI/DDD reprogramming in eight patients, minor symptoms in 17 (74%). A comparison between 14 patients, who preferred DVI/DDD period (Group A), and the remaining nine patients who noted no preference between DVI/DDD and VVI period (Group B) was performed on the basis of the preimplant evaluation. Group A patients had a greater pacemaker effect (-34 +/- 16 mmHg vs -16 +/- 14 mmHg) and a higher prevalence of symptomatic pacemaker effect (50% vs 0%), of ventriculo-atrial conduction (78% vs 44%) and of orthostatic hypotension (50% vs 11%), while the entity of the systolic pressure fall caused by carotid sinus massage was similar in the two groups either during VVI mode (Group A -51 +/- 16 mmHg vs Group B -56 +/- 27 mmHg) or DVI mode (Group A -38 +/- 17 mmHg vs Group B -45 +/- 17 mmHg).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Carotid sinus hypersensitivity in patients with unexplained syncope: clinical, electrophysiologic, and long-term follow-up observations

To assess the incidence and clinical characteristics of carotid sinus hypersensitivity and the relationship to electrophysiologic findings, 76 patients with unexplained syncope underwent carotid sinus massage during electrophysiologic studies for syncope evaluation. Twenty-one patients (28%) were found to have carotid sinus hypersensitivity. Of these 21 patients, 11 (52%) had coronary artery disease, two (10%) had hypertensive heart disease, and eight (38%) had no organic heart disease. During electrophysiologic studies, abnormal sinus node function was found in three patients (14%), abnormal atrioventricular (AV) node function was noted in four (19%), and combined abnormal sinus node and AV node functions were seen in three (14%). Eleven patients (53%) had a normal electrophysiologic study. During carotid sinus massage, sinus arrest alone was observed in 12 patients (57%), and combined sinus arrest and AV nodal block was seen in nine (43%). Thirteen patients were treated with a permanent pacemaker, in whom either carotid sinus massage reproduced the symptom or concomitant sinus node or AV node abnormality, or organic heart disease was present. With a mean follow-up of 42 +/- 19 months, none of these 13 patients had recurrent syncope. However, one of eight patients (13%) who did not receive a pacemaker had recurrence of syncope. Subsequently, this patient has done well after implantation of a pacemaker. These observations suggest that there is a significant incidence of carotid sinus hypersensitivity in patients with unexplained syncope. Permanent pacing appears to be beneficial in selected patients based on clinical and electrophysiologic findings.

Role of invasive electrophysiologic testing in patients with symptomatic bundle branch block

Electrophysiologic testing was performed in 112 symptomatic patients with bundle branch block. Abnormalities included HV interval 70 ms or longer (35 patients), infra-Hisian block with atrial pacing (6 patients) and sinus node dysfunction (23 patients). Inducible ventricular tachycardia occurred in 47 patients (42%). Therapy was based on the electrophysiologic test result: group I--16 patients with no therapy (normal study results); group II--34 patients with permanent pacing alone; group III--39 patients with antiarrhythmic therapy alone; and group IV--21 patients with both antiarrhythmic therapy and permanent pacing. Cumulative 4-year survival rates were 83% in group I, 84% in group II, 63% in group III and 84% in group IV (mean follow-up 2.5 years). Recurrent syncope occurred in 19% of group I, 6% of group II, 33% of group III and 19% of group IV. In symptomatic patients with bundle branch block and normal electrophysiologic test results, prognosis is good without treatment. In patients undergoing permanent pacing based on electrophysiologic testing, survival is good and rate of symptom recurrence is low. Electrophysiologic testing identifies patients with inducible ventricular tachycardia for whom antiarrhythmic therapy is indicated but who nevertheless have a poor prognosis.

Carotid sinus hypersensitivity in elderly nursing home patients

Fourteen of 100 geriatric nursing home patients were shown to have evidence of carotid sinus hypersensitivity. The incidence of syncope and falls was noted in prospective follow-up over 33 months. Falls were classified as either simple or complicated by laceration or fracture. Patients experienced simple falls at similar rates whether carotid sinus hypersensitivity was present or absent. For patients with carotid sinus hypersensitivity, the risk of a laceration was increased more than twofold, that of fracture more than threefold, and that of syncope tenfold. Carotid sinus hypersensitivity warrants greater attention as a contributory factor to serious falls and syncope in the elderly; and its importance may have been underestimated in the past.

Symptomatic "isolated" carotid sinus hypersensitivity: natural history and results of treatment with anticholinergic drugs or pacemaker

Because syncope may occur intermittently in patients with carotid sinus hypersensitivity, a knowledge of its natural history is needed as a basis for interpreting the usefulness of therapy. Fifty-six consecutive patients are described (47 men and 9 women; mean age 61 years) with carotid sinus hypersensitivity and syncope in whom 24 hour ambulatory monitoring and intracardiac electrophysiologic study revealed no other cause for the syncope. The mean duration of symptoms was 44 months (range 1 to 480) and the mean number of episodes was 4.0 (range 1 to 20). During a follow-up period of 6 to 120 months (median 40), syncope recurred in 3 of 13 patients who received no treatment, in 2 of 23 patients who received a pacemaker and in 4 of 20 patients who received anticholinergic drugs (incidences corrected for totals available at follow-up: 27, 9 and 22%, respectively). Two-thirds of the patients receiving no treatment were asymptomatic compared with all nine of the patients with syncope and a pure cardioinhibitory response to carotid sinus massage who received an atrioventricular (AV) sequential pacemaker. Although pacing was effective in abolishing syncope, its use should be reserved for recurrent episodes because of the high rate of spontaneous remission of symptoms.

Vagotonia in infants, children, adolescents and young adults

Twenty-four patients with various manifestations of increased vagal tone were seen between 1975 and 1981. Three distinct groups could be identified by clinical characteristics and to some extent by age. The first group showed evidence of prolonged atrioventricular conduction on their electrocardiograms but were asymptomatic. The others presented with syncope, the etiology of which was determined to be vasovagal. Some patients were older and more athletic. They suffered from syncope associated with exercise or heavy exertion. The youngest patients, however, experienced frequent prolonged episodes of syncope often mistaken for seizures. Treatment for the older patients with syncope consisted mainly of behavior modification, while 5 out of 6 younger patients required the implantation of a ventricular demand pacemaker to prevent repeated and problematic recurrences of syncope.

Sinus node electrogram in patients with the hypersensitive carotid sinus syndrome

Sinus node electrograms were obtained in two patients with unexplained syncope and the cardioinhibitory form of the hypersensitive carotid sinus syndrome. Direct recordings of sinus node potentials were obtained using a transvenous electrode catheter. Sinus node function was normal in both patients during standard electrophysiologic evaluation. Carotid sinus massage was performed in both patients and the sinus node electrogram was continuously recorded. After the onset of carotid sinus massage, prolongation of sinoatrial time, slowing of sinus rate of depolarization, sinoatrial exit block and finally sinus node arrest were recorded. After termination of carotid sinus massage, sinus node potentials did not precede the first atrial impulse; subsequent beats showed markedly prolonged sinoatrial times as well as changes in the P wave on the surface electrocardiogram. Sinus rate and sinoatrial time returned to control values gradually, as did the P wave configuration. Intravenous atropine (1.0 mg) abolished the abnormal response to carotid sinus massage. It is concluded that the application of carotid sinus massage in patients with the hypersensitive carotid sinus syndrome produces profound changes in sinoatrial conduction including sinoatrial exit block, as well as shifts in primary pacemaker site and sinus node arrest. These alterations in conduction and automaticity are reversible with atropine and may be secondary to denervation sensitivity to acetylcholine.

Carotid sinus hypersensitivity. Case report and review of the literature

Carotid sinus hypersensitivity is a potentially treatable cause of recurrent neurologic symptoms. Diagnosis depends upon recognizing the variable presentation of symptomatic carotid sinus hypersensitivity, and noting an exaggerated cardiovascular response to carotid sinus massage associated with neurologic symptoms. Once the diagnosis of symptomatic carotid sinus hypersensitivity has been established, it is important to delineate the type of hypersensitivity present, because identification of the vasodepressor response has important therapeutic implications.

Diagnostic assessment of recurrent syncope

The definitive diagnosis of a cardiac arrhythmia as the basis for syncope is made by electrocardiographic monitoring during a syncopal episode. In the absence of this evidence, abnormalities demonstrated by an electrophysiologic study may suggest the etiology of syncope. Cardiac electrophysiologic testing in patients with recurrent syncope should probably be limited to patients with underlying cardiac disease. These patients are at a higher risk for sudden death and have a high incidence of electrophysiologic abnormalities. In particular, ventricular tachycardia may be evoked and specific therapy for this abnormality is associated with remission of syncope. In contrast, electrophysiologic studies in patients with no underlying cardiac disease have a very low yield of abnormal findings in the order of 10-20%, and should be performed only when there are reasons to suspect the presence of arrhythmias. Furthermore, in patients with no underlying cardiovascular disease there is a high spontaneous remission rate of syncope and the late incidence of sudden death is low, and related to the presence of other systemic illnesses. At present, the significance of nonsustained ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation induced during cardiac electrophysiologic studies in patients with no documented arrhythmias is unknown, and further prospective studies are necessary to define appropriate therapy for these patients. Further investigation is also required to clarify the spontaneous remission rate of syncope, as this information is of vital importance in assessing the success of any therapeutic modality.

Carotid sinus hypersensitivity: beneficial effects of dual-chamber pacing

Three types of carotid sinus (CS) syndrome have been described: cardioinhibitory, vasodepressor and mixed. For the treatment of symptomatic patients with associated significant cardioinhibition, permanent ventricular demand pacing systems are often implanted. Even with this pacing modality, some patients remain symptomatic because of continued (and at times aggravated) vasodepression. This study assesses the effects of loss of atrial preloading and orthostasis after carotid massage in patients with CS hypersensitivity. Eleven patients were studied using constant intra-arterial pressure measurements during either ventricular (VVI) or atrioventricular sequential (DVI) pacing in both supine or upright positions. The measurements performed included the magnitude of decrease in arterial blood pressure (BP), the rate of decrease of BP and the percent change in BP from baseline values. After carotid massage, all 11 patients had greater hemodynamic change with the VVI than DVI pacing mode, whether in the supine or upright position. The decreases in systolic BP were: DVI (supine) 29 mm Hg, VVI (supine) 48 mm Hg, DVI (upright) 37 mm Hg, and VVI (upright) 59 mm Hg (mean group values, p less than 0.001). The rates of decrease of systolic BP were: DVI (supine) 2.9 mm Hg/s, VVI (supine) 5.7 mm Hg/s, DVI (upright) 4.1 mm Hg/s, and VVI (upright) 8.3 mm Hg/s (mean group values, p less than 0.001). VVI pacing, particularly in the upright position, resulted in a significant increase in the incidence of patient symptoms (p = 0.03). Thus, in CS hypersensitivity, VVI pacing results in significant hemodynamic deterioration compared to DVI mode. This aggravation of the vasodepressor component results in increased patient symptoms, and therefore, DVI is the optimal pacing mode.

Vasovagal syncope in children requiring pacemaker implantation

Four children presented with episodic loss of consciousness. Two of the children were siblings. Neurologic causes were initially suspected in all but extensive evaluations and EEGs excluded seizures. ECGs in one patient demonstrated first- and second-degree AV block and first-degree AV block in another. The QT and QTc intervals were normal in all. Eyeball pressure in all patients produced profound bradycardia. All patients became asymptomatic after the implantation of pacemakers, although one died 15 months afterward from another cause.

Electrophysiologic findings in carotid sinus massage

Thirty patients with carotid sinus syndrome were electrophysiologically studied. In 14 patients carotid sinus massage was performed during atrial and ventricular stimulation, and the conduction times were measured. The AH-time was prolonged by more than 120 ms in 6 patients (20%); the HV-time was prolonged in 6 patients by more than 55 ms (20%); 5 patients had bundle branch block (16.7%); The sinus node recovery time was prolonged in 7 out of 27 patients (26%). Ten patients (33%) did not have additional electrophysiologic abnormalities. There was a predominance of carotid sinus syndrome on the right side. During carotid sinus massage there was a significant increase of the AH-time, but there were no significant changes of the HV-time or the width of the QRS-complexes. Twenty-one patients developed an atrial asystole and 9 patients an atrial bradycardia and an additional AV-block. There was a longer AH-time and a longer prolongation of the AH-time in the patients who developed an AV-block. Twelve out of 14 patients (85.7%) developed an AV-block during carotid sinus massage and atrial pacing. During ventricular pacing 5 of 14 patients (35.7%) revealed a complete retrograde block before carotid sinus massage and 5 of the remaining 9 patients developed a total retrograde block during carotid sinus massage. Consequently, in 71.4% of the patients with carotid sinus syndrome complete retrograde conduction block and atrial asystole can be expected during attacks of ventricular asystole and simultaneous ventricular pacing. In conclusion, there is a high incidence of additional disturbances of the sinus node function and AV-conduction in patients with carotid sinus syndrome. AAI pacemakers are contraindicated due to the common development of additional AV-block during carotid sinus massage. Physiologic pacing might contribute to better hemodynamics, particularly in patients with the mixed type of carotid sinus syndrome.

The impact of diagnostic tests in evaluating patients with syncope

We reviewed the charts of 100 patients admitted to the hospital for evaluation of syncope. The charts were examined with special attention given to the causes of syncope, the frequency and benefit of diagnostic tests, and the relative cost of these tests. In 39 patients no etiology for syncope was found, and another 18 were felt to have had a vasovagal episode. Twelve patients had arrhythmias as the cause for syncope. Most of the patients underwent a variety of diagnostic tests including cardiac enzyme determinations, brain scans, electroencephalograms, head CAT scans, and Holter monitoring. In most instances, these tests added little useful information to the initial history and physical exam and were done at great expense to the patient. Our data suggest that extensive neurologic testing in patients with "routine" syncope is not warranted and that the focus of hospitalization should be to rule out potentially life-threatening arrhythmias.

Undiagnosed syncope: search for an arrhythmic etiology

Patients with recurrent, unheralded syncope are often suspected of having intermittent cardiac bradyarrhythmias or tachyarrhythmias. However, syncopal episodes may be infrequent and investigations may yield few or non-specific etiological clues. Therapy may be entirely empirical (pacing or antiarrhythmic drugs) or guided by an abnormality detected that suggests a particular diagnosis. Intracardiac electrophysiological studies may detect conduction abnormalities or provoke arrhythmias but the relationship between these findings and clinical symptoms may be difficult to establish. The recording of the ECG during syncope by repeated ambulatory monitoring or other methods remains the only unequivocal diagnostic technique to establish an arrhythmic etiology.

Carotid sinus syncope treated by pacing. Analysis of persistent symptoms and role of atrioventricular sequential pacing

Seventy patients have been paced for carotid sinus syndrome over four years. Twelve patients had persistent symptoms despite adequate ventricular pacing. Patients with persistent symptoms were found to have a significant vasodepressor response, a significant hypotensive response to ventricular pacing (pacemaker effect), and a severe hypotensive response to carotid sinus massage with introduction of ventricular pacing, which reproduced symptoms in all patients. A group of 14 asymptomatic paced carotid sinus patients was found to have a significantly lower vasodepressor response, pacemaker effect, and combined vasodepressor response plus pacemaker effect than the group with persistent symptoms. Atrioventricular sequential pacing was shown to eliminate the hypotensive effect of ventricular pacing and is considered to be the treatment of choice for patients with carotid sinus syndrome who have both cardioinhibitory and significant vasodepressor responses.