Usefulness of plasma renin activity in predicting haemodynamic and clinical responses and survival during long term converting enzyme inhibition in severe chronic heart failure. Experience in 100 consecutive patients

Novel neurohormonal insights with therapeutic potential in chronic heart failure

Despite considerable therapeutic advances over recent years, chronic heart failure remains associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Further improvements in the treatment of this syndrome are therefore needed and this will require advances in the understanding of its underlying pathophysiology. This article reviews the literature regarding recently identified neurohormonal pathways that are declaring themselves as potential therapeutic targets in chronic heart failure.

Comparison of Active Renin Concentration and Plasma Renin Activity as a Prognostic Predictor in Patients With Heart Failure

BACKGROUND

Plasma renin activity (PRA) may be limited to angiotensinogen levels, which decrease in patients with heart failure (HF) because of liver congestion.

METHODS AND RESULTS

To evaluate whether the plasma active renin concentration (ARC) is a more useful prognostic predictor than PRA, the plasma levels of ARC, PRA, angiotensin II, aldosterone, brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), norepinephrine, and hemodynamic parameters were measured in 214 consecutive HF patients who were already taking angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) or angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARB). Median follow-up period was 1,197 days. Of the clinical variables, including pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, right atrial pressure, left ventricular ejection fraction, and neurohumoral factors, only high plasma levels of log ARC (p<0.0001) and log BNP (p=0.0009), but not log PRA, were significant independent prognostic predictors. Log ARC/PRA ratio was significantly higher in nonsurvivors than in survivors. Log ARC/PRA significantly correlated with pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (r=0.305, p<0.0001), right atrial pressure (r=0.222, p=0.0011), and log BNP (r=0.242, p=0.0004).

CONCLUSIONS

Plasma ARC is superior to PRA and a high plasma ARC is an independent prognostic predictor in HF patients who are already receiving ACEI or ARB.

Serum to urinary sodium concentration ratio is an estimate of plasma renin activity in congestive heart failure

We investigated the relationship between plasma renin activity (PRA) and serum ([sNa(+)]) and urinary ([uNa(+)]) sodium concentrations in 124 congestive heart failure (CHF) patients (II-IV NYHA class) and 20 healthy subjects. According to PRA (> or <3 ng ml(-1) h(-1)) and [sNa(+)] (> or <135 mEq l(-1)), patients were classified as Group A (normal PRA and normal [sNa(+)], n=39), Group B (increased PRA and normal [sNa(+)], n=62) and Group C (low [sNa(+)], n=23). Measurements were performed at rest and, in 26 cases, after extracorporeal ultrafiltration (UF). At rest, [sNa(+)] and [uNa(+)], and their difference ([sNa(+)]-[uNa(+)]), were linearly correlated with PRA, but the values did not allow differentiation of control subjects from patients or differentiation of patients with from those without renin-angiotensin system (RAS) activation. Conversely, the [sNa(+)]/[uNa(+)] ratio showed the best correlation with PRA (r=0.79, P<0.0001). UF-induced PRA changes were linearly correlated with [sNa(+)]/[uNa(+)] ratio changes (r=0.67, P=0.002), but not with those of [sNa(+)], [uNa(+)] and [sNa(+)]-[uNa(+)]. In CHF, the [sNa(+)]/[uNa(+)] ratio best correlates with PRA and reflects the basal activity as well as the rapid changes (as those induced by UF) of the RAS. Therefore, it can be considered a strong and easily available marker of PRA.

Cardiac production of angiotensin II and its pharmacologic inhibition: effects on the coronary circulation

Angiotensin II (AII), produced systemically as well as locally in the heart, affects the coronary circulation, as do consequences of its pharmacologic inhibition. AII is a powerful vasoconstrictor directly acting on vascular smooth muscle cells, modulating sympathetic innervation and calcium ion influx, and releasing other vasoconstrictor factors. In addition to these immediate actions, AII has longer-term biologic actions that influence cardiac endothelial function, vascular smooth muscle cell phenotype expression, and fibroblast proliferation. Moreover, the production of AII is interrelated with the vasodilator substances bradykinin, nitric oxide, and prostaglandins E2 and I2 (prostacyclin). Circulating hormonal actions of AII include fluid retention, direct vasoconstriction, and sympathetic neuromodulation, all resulting in increased left ventricular preload and afterload. Because of these local and hormonal characteristics, AII can immediately affect the myocardial balance of metabolic demand and supply and long term can induce structural vascular and myocardial alterations. Pharmacologic inhibition of AII production likely conveys myocardial and vascular protection in situations of acute myocardial oxygen debt. In the long term, inhibition of AII may attenuate structural changes in the coronary microcirculation related to various cardiomyopathies or acute tissue injury, and direct antiatherogenic effects may also occur.

Effect of the insertion/deletion polymorphism of the angiotensin-converting enzyme gene on response to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in patients with heart failure

There is marked interindividual variation in serum and tissue angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) levels for which the insertion (I)/deletion (D) polymorphism in intron 16 of the ACE gene is a marker. ACE inhibitors have important effects on morbidity and mortality in heart failure. The influence of this polymorphism on the response to ACE inhibitors in patients with heart failure is not known. We studied response by ACE genotype of 34 subjects in a randomised, double-blind, crossover study comparing 6 weeks of lisinopril (10 mg, o.d.) or captopril (25 mg, t.d.s.) on 24-h blood pressure (BP) profile and on renal function in patients with symptomatic heart failure [mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), 24%]. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR), 99mTc diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA), and ambulatory 24-h mean arterial pressure (MAP; Spacelabs 90207) were assessed at the beginning and end of treatment periods. There was a significant relation between ACE genotype and change in MAP with captopril (mm Hg; DD group, -0.5; ID, -4.7; II, -7.4; p = 0.02) but not to lisinopril (mm Hg DD, -6.0; ID, -6.6; II, -7.4; p = 0.89) in these patients. There was no significant relation between genotype and change in GFR with captopril (percentage change from baseline: DD, +7.9; ID, +13.1; II, -0.6; p = 0.45) or lisinopril (percentage change from baseline: DD, -0.1; ID, -3.0; II, -13.3; p = 0.39), but the decline in renal function tended to be greatest in II subjects. Whereas the results are not conclusive, there may be a significant interaction between ACE genotype and response to ACE inhibitors in patients with heart failure.

Fundamental role of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in the management of congestive heart failure

Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition therapy has now become firmly ensconced in the modern therapeutic approach to all stages of congestive heart failure (CHF), including the early presymptomatic phase. Although its benefit is abundantly proven as add-on therapy in established CHF, after digitalis and diuretics, smaller and shorter studies have shown that, as second-line therapy and combined with diuretics, it may be preferable to digoxin with an undoubted benefit in postinfarction failure. As first-line therapy in early presymptomatic CHF, the evidence is also good, based on the prevention arm of the Studies of Left Ventricular Dysfunction (SOLVD), albeit in predominantly postinfarction patients, and on the Survival and Ventricular Enlargement (SAVE) study on postinfarction patients. ACE inhibitors given prophylactically or therapeutically helped to prevent clinical heart failure in the SOLVD and SAVE studies. These data suggest a role for ACE inhibitors as effective first-line monotherapy in early heart failure, acting on left ventricular function to avoid or lessen unfavorable remodeling. There are some contraindications or cautions for the use of ACE inhibitors in CHF, such as preexisting hypotension, high-renin states such as bilateral renal artery stenosis with hypertensive heart failure, aortic stenosis combined with CHF, overdiuresis with excess sodium depletion, and significant preexisting renal failure. ACE inhibition therapy may have deleterious effects on renal function in heart failure, for example, by decreasing the glomerular filtration rate.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Discrepancy between plasma and lung angiotensin-converting enzyme activity in experimental congestive heart failure. A novel aspect of endothelium dysfunction

The renin-angiotensin and cardiac natriuretic systems play an important role in the pathophysiology of congestive heart failure (CHF). The status of the membrane-bound pulmonary and renal activities of three ectoenzymes involved in the regulation of these systems-angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE), neutral endopeptidase (NEP), and aminopeptidase A (APA)-was investigated in Wistar rats 3 months after induction of myocardial infarction (MI) and in sham-operated (control) rats. Plasma renin activity and ACE activity, plasma angiotensin II (Ang II) levels, and atrial natriuretic factor levels were simultaneously determined. The lung ACE activity was decreased in MI rats compared with control rats (P < .0001), and this decrease depended on the severity of the heart failure. In contrast, plasma ACE activity was increased in MI rats (P < .01), and this increase was also proportional to the severity of MI. Northern blot analysis showed that the lung ACE mRNA level in severe MI rats was half that of the control rats. Renal ACE activity of the MI rats was not affected, and neither renal or pulmonary NEP nor pulmonary APA activities were altered. Thus, lung ACE gene expression appears to be both organ- and enzyme-specifically regulated during CHF. Whereas plasma renin was increased in heart failure rats, plasma Ang II levels were not different from those of control rats. Thus, decreased lung ACE activity could possibly contribute to keeping plasma Ang II levels in the normal range. The decrease in lung ACE activity and mRNA levels, combined with increased plasma ACE activity, represents a novel aspect of endothelial dysfunction in CHF.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The renin-angiotensin system and angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors

Anaesthetists will encounter increasing numbers of patients who are receiving long-term treatment with ACE inhibitors for hypertension, congestive heart failure and prophylactically following myocardial infarction. Our understanding of the physiology and pharmacology of the renin-angiotensin system has dramatically increased in the last decade, and has led to the discovery of endogenous renin-angiotensin systems which may be physiologically more important than the better understood circulating system. There are several reports of adverse interactions between anaesthesia and ACE inhibitors, manifested as hypotension and bradycardia, which may be delayed until the postoperative period. The mechanism behind them is not understood and, as yet, no published studies have attempted to address this issue. It is possible, however, that dehydration associated with the pre-operative fast may play an important role. ACE inhibitors may, in the future, prove to be useful in the subspecialties of cardiac and vascular anaesthesia, where they might be used in an attempt to preserve cardiac function following periods of ischaemia and cardiopulmonary bypass, and to avoid renal damage following aortic cross-clamping. Meanwhile, it would seem prudent to exercise caution when anaesthetising patients taking ACE inhibitors and to be fully prepared to treat the hypotension and bradycardia which may occur.

Contrasting patterns of arterial and venous dilatation after intravenous captopril in patients with chronic cardiac failure and their relationship to plasma angiotensin II concentrations

A 25 mg intravenous bolus injection of captopril caused an abrupt and rapid decrease in systemic vascular resistance (time to maximum effect 15 minutes), but a more gradual decrease in right atrial pressure (time to maximum effect 75 minutes) in 12 patients with chronic cardiac failure. Plasma angiotensin II concentrations fell significantly, reaching their lowest concentrations at 75 minutes after the injection of captopril, at which time systemic vascular resistance had begun to return toward control values. There was no correlation between the acute arteriodilator response and pretreatment plasma renin activity or plasma angiotensin II concentrations, or the decrease in plasma angiotensin II concentrations. There was a significant correlation between the decrease in plasma angiotensin II concentrations and the decrease in right atrial pressure (r = 0.67, p < 0.05). These findings suggest that in contrast to the venous response to intravenous captopril, the arterial response is not entirely dependent on a decrease in the circulating plasma angiotensin II concentration.

Current issues in advanced heart failure

In the past 50 years, an increased understanding of the pathophysiologic mechanisms associated with the development of heart failure has produced a more precise treatment of this syndrome. The effects of the agents used for the treatment of patients with advanced heart failure have been summarized in this article and demonstrate the importance of vasodilatory drugs on the survival and progression of dilated cardiomyopathy.

Determinants of the renal response to ACE inhibition in patients with congestive heart failure

The objective of the present study was to determine whether pretreatment neurohormonal and renal hemodynamic parameters predict the change in renal function with the administration of quinapril, a new angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor. Twenty patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III and IV heart failure were evaluated. Following pretreatment determination of renal function and plasma neurohormones, patients were treated daily with 10 mg of quinapril. Measurements of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and renal plasma flow (RPF) were repeated after 7 weeks to assess changes in function (delta GFR and delta RPF). Mean GFR increased from 49 +/- 6 to 56 +/- 7 ml/min/1.73 m2 (p = 0.10), but decreased in five patients. Mean RPF increased from 235 +/- 23 to 252 +/- 23 ml/min/1.73 m2 (p = 0.08), but decreased in five patients. There was no relation between delta GFR and baseline determinations of GFR, RPF, plasma renin activity, plasma angiotensin II, or serum Na. Only a high filtration fraction (GFR/RPF) predicted a decreased GFR (r = 0.61, p less than 0.005). In contrast, no baseline renal hemodynamic parameter correlated with delta RPF. We conclude that poor renal function does not increase the risk of renal deterioration with quinapril. However, dependence of renal function upon the renin-angiotensin system may be predicted by a high filtration fraction.

Lack of correlation between the acute haemodynamic response to intravenous captopril and plasma concentrations of angiotensin II in patients with chronic cardiac failure

We have given a series of incremental intravenous injections of captopril to ten patients with chronic cardiac failure. Small doses of captopril produced significant changes in pulmonary artery end-diastolic pressure and right atrial pressure, up to a total cumulative dose of captopril of 2.5 mg, after which further injections had no significant effect. There were large changes in systemic vascular resistance and blood pressure up to a cumulative dose of captopril of 5.0 mg, after which the injection of larger doses caused no further significant changes. Small doses of intravenous captopril produced large increases in plasma renin activity and plasma angiotensin I concentrations up to a total cumulative dose of captopril of 1.25 mg, after which there were no significant further changes in either plasma renin activity or plasma angiotensin I concentration. However the plasma concentration of angiotensin II fell more slowly, no further change being recorded after a total cumulative dose of captopril of 10 mg. These results suggest that plasma renin activity is not the only determinant of plasma angiotensin II concentrations.

Influence of mitral regurgitation on the response to captopril therapy for congestive heart failure caused by idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy

To assess the influence of mitral regurgitation (MR) on the response to captopril therapy for congestive heart failure (CHF), 30 patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy in New York Heart Association functional class III were studied. Left ventricular end-diastolic diameter and stroke volume were measured by Doppler echocardiography, and exercise tolerance by exercise testing before and at 1, 3 and 12 months after treatment. Patients were classified into 2 groups: those with (n = 14) and those without (n = 16) MR. No significant differences were observed between the 2 groups in pretreatment studies. Exercise tolerance increased significantly in the group with MR (p less than 0.001) during the year of follow-up, from 514 +/- 193 seconds at baseline study to 671 +/- 178 seconds (p less than 0.0005) at 1 month, 688 +/- 127 seconds (p less than 0.0005) at 3 months and 690 +/- 108 seconds (p less than 0.01) at 12 months. The group without MR had no significant changes. Stroke volume increased significantly only in the MR group during follow-up (p less than 0.01), changing from 43 +/- 9 ml at baseline study to 52 +/- 11 ml (p less than 0.01) at 1 and 49 +/- 11 ml (p less than 0.01) at 3 months. At 12 months the increase was not statistically significant. Left ventricular end-diastolic diameter decreased more in the group with than without MR, although the differences were not significant. Thus, the presence of dynamic MR appears to be an important factor in the therapeutic response to captopril therapy for CHF.

Differences in first dose response to angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition in congestive heart failure: a placebo controlled study

OBJECTIVE

To compare the first dose responses to low dose angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (captopril, enalapril, and perindopril) in elderly patients with stable chronic heart failure.

DESIGN

Double blind, randomised, placebo controlled, parallel, group prospective study of elderly patients with stable chronic heart failure.

SETTING

General hospital in-patient admissions for supervised diuretic withdrawal (24-48 hours) and the introduction of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor therapy.

PATIENTS

48 unselected elderly (58-85 years) patients with symptomatic but stable chronic heart failure (New York Heart Association grades II-IV) confirmed by clinical history, examination, and cardiological investigations. Patients gave their written and informed consent to receive their initial treatment under double blind conditions; blood pressure was monitored and blood samples taken to measure the pharmacokinetic and neurohormonal responses.

INTERVENTION

Patients were randomised to receive a daily oral dose of placebo, captopril (6.25 mg), enalapril (2.5 mg), or perindopril (2 mg).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Blood pressure and heart rate responses, drug concentration, and plasma renin and ACE activities. Differences between treatment groups were analysed by analysis of variance.

RESULTS

The four randomised groups of patients had similar age, severity of heart failure (NYHA class), pretreatment diuretic dosage, plasma renin activity, and serum electrolyte state. Placebo treatment caused a modest but significant diurnal fall in blood pressure. Captopril produced a significant early (1.5 hours) and brief fall in blood pressure. The blood pressure fall with enalapril was later (4-10 hours), longer lasting, and was associated with significant slowing of supine heart rate. Though perindopril produced a similar plasma ACE inhibition to that produced by enalapril, it only caused changes in blood pressure that were similar to those caused by placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

This controlled study is the first to indicate a qualitative difference in the acute response to angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors with similar structure and metabolism (that is, enalapril and perindopril). Low dose perindopril seems to be less likely to cause hypotension in patients with heart failure. The explanation for the differences is unclear but may reflect differential effects on local tissue angiotensin generation.

Effect of long-term enalapril therapy on cardiopulmonary exercise performance in men with mild heart failure and previous myocardial infarction

Forty-one men with documented myocardial infarction greater than 6 months previously were randomized to long-term (48 weeks) therapy with placebo or enalapril on a double-blind basis. All patients were receiving concurrent therapy with digitalis and a diuretic drug for symptomatic heart failure (functional class II or III). The mean age was 64 +/- 7.3 years and no patient suffered from exertional chest pain. Patients underwent maximal cardiopulmonary exertional chest pain. Patients underwent maximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing to exhaustion on an ergometer cycle nine times over the course of 48 weeks. Gas exchange data were collected on a breath by breath basis with use of a continuous ramp protocol. In the placebo group (n = 21), the mean (+/- SD) peak oxygen consumption (VO2) at baseline was 18.8 +/- 5.2 versus 18.5 +/- 5.5 ml/kg per min at 48 weeks (-1.4%, p = NS). In the enalapril group (n = 20), the corresponding values were 18.1 +/- 3.1 versus 18.3 +/- 2.6 ml/kg per min (+2.8%, p = NS). The mean VO2 at the anaerobic threshold for the placebo group at baseline study was 13.1 +/- 3.5 versus 12.8 +/- 2.1 ml/kg per min at 48 weeks (-2.2%, p = NS). The corresponding values for the enalapril group were 11.8 +/- 2.3 versus 11.8 +/- 2.4 ml/kg per min (+1.4%, p = NS). The mean total exercise duration in the placebo group at baseline study was 589 +/- 153 versus 620 +/- 181 s at 48 weeks (+5.4%, p = NS).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Tissue and plasma angiotensin converting enzyme and the response to ACE inhibitor drugs

1. There is a body of circumstantial and direct evidence supporting the existence and functional importance of a tissue based RAS at a variety of sites. 2. The relation between circulatory and tissue based systems is complex. The relative importance of the two in determining haemodynamic effects is unknown. 3. Despite the wide range of ACE inhibitors already available, it remains unclear whether there are genuine differences related to tissue specificity. 4. Pathological states such as chronic cardiac failure need to be explored with regard to the contribution of tissue based ACE activities in generating acute and chronic haemodynamic responses to ACE inhibitors. 5. The role of tissue vs plasma ACE activity may be clarified by study of the relation between drug concentration and haemodynamic effect, provided that the temporal dissociation is examined and linked to circulating and tissue based changes in ACE activity, angiotensin peptides and sympathetic hormones.

Low angiotensinogen levels are related to the severity and liver dysfunction of congestive heart failure: implications for renin measurements

PURPOSE

To compare the determination of plasma renin activity (PRA) and the direct measurement of active renin by immunoradiometric assay (IRMA) as methods of assessing the renin system in patients with congestive heart failure.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The status of the renin-angiotensin system in congestive heart failure was assessed by measuring the plasma renin substrate concentration, PRA, and plasma concentration of active renin in 37 patients with mild to severe congestive heart failure. Natremia and plasma levels of atrial natriuretic factor (ANF) were determined as biologic indexes of the severity of heart failure, and concentrations of prealbumin and retinol-binding protein were used as indexes of liver dysfunction.

RESULTS

The PRA and the concentrations of active renin and ANF were markedly higher in patients with New York Heart Association class IV heart failure than in patients with class II to III heart failure, while natremia and the concentrations of renin substrate, prealbumin, and retinol-binding protein were markedly lower in the class IV patients than in the class II to III patients. Plasma renin substrate concentration was negatively correlated with active renin concentration (n = 37, r = -0.45, p = 0.005), and positively related to natremia (r = 0.56, p less than 0.0005), prealbumin (r = 0.54, p less than 0.001), and retinol-binding protein (r = 0.60, p less than 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Low levels of plasma renin substrate can be considered as an indirect index of the severity of heart failure that reflects both the high level of circulating active renin and the decrease in hepatic protein output. In patients with class IV heart failure, low levels of renin substrate led to a marked underestimation of active renin concentration from measurements of PRA. In contrast, direct IRMA of active renin measures the true plasma active renin concentration, independent of plasma renin substrate, and closely reflects renin secretion.

Hormones regulating cardiovascular function in patients with severe congestive heart failure and their relation to mortality. CONSENSUS Trial Study Group

There is a varying hormonal activation in heart failure. To be able to evaluate this activation and relate it to prognosis, we took blood samples at baseline and after 6 weeks from 239 patients with severe heart failure (all in New York Heart Association class IV) randomized to additional treatment with enalapril or placebo. In this study (CONSENSUS), which has previously been reported, there was a significant reduction in mortality among patients treated with enalapril. The present data show in the placebo group a significant positive relation between mortality and levels of angiotensin II (p less than 0.05), aldosterone (p = 0.003), noradrenaline (p less than 0.001), adrenaline (p = 0.001), and atrial natriuretic factor (p = 0.003). A similar relation was not observed among the patients treated with enalapril. Significant reductions in mortality in the groups of patients treated with enalapril were consistently found among patients with baseline hormone levels above median values. There were significant reductions in hormone levels from baseline to 6 weeks in the group of patients treated with enalapril for all hormones except adrenaline. There were no correlations between these changes in hormone levels. Summarily, there is a pronounced but variable neurohormonal activation in heart failure even in patients with similar clinical findings. This activation is reduced by enalapril therapy. The results suggest that the effect of enalapril on mortality is related to hormonal activation in general and the renin-angiotensin system in particular.

Endocrinologic Warfare: The Role of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors in Congestive Heart Failure

The angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors represent the gold standard of vasodilator therapy for congestive heart failure through blunting of the endocrinologic manifestations of heart failure. The future role of these agents may be in the asymptomatic and mild stages of heart failure. ACE inhibitors have been shown to decrease morbidity and mortality with the natural history of this disease being altered. The future will bring many new ACE inhibitors to market, with the challenge for physicians and pharmacists to understand the important distinctions of each specific agent. © 1990 by W.B. Saunders Company.

Enalapril as initial and sole treatment in severe chronic heart failure with sodium retention

Five patients, who had never received any drug treatment but who had severe chronic congestive heart failure with salt and water retention, were studied before and after a single dose of enalapril (10 mg orally). Three patients continued on enalapril as monotherapy (10 mg b.d. orally) for one month. Central haemodynamics, body fluid volumes, renal function and plasma hormones were measured at rest. The initial mean right atrial pressure was 13 +/- 4 mm Hg, pulmonary wedge pressure 29 +/- 4 mm Hg and cardiac index 1.8 +/- 0.21/min/m2. Enalapril, given acutely, caused only small changes. Two patients were withdrawn after the single dose of enalapril and treated with diuretics for clinical reasons. The remaining three patients each lost more than 4 kg in weight after one month of treatment with enalapril alone. Total body exchangeable sodium and total body water were reduced but central haemodynamics were unchanged. Although enalapril was of some benefit when given alone to patients with severe congestive heart failure, all five patients were finally treated with diuretics for clinical reasons. Enalapril is not recommended as the initial and only therapy for patients with severe congestive heart failure.

Hypokalemia and cardiovascular disease

A growing body of experimental, epidemiologic and physiologic evidence testifies to the hazards of hypokalemia and other electrolyte disorders that can complicate the chronic use of diuretic drugs in patients with cardiovascular disease. This study reviews the complex renal and extrarenal mechanisms that regulate potassium balance in normal persons with special attention to the role of stress-related hormones. Disturbances of potassium balance are common in patients taking diuretics; indeed, the potential number of people in this country at risk of diuretic-related hypokalemia approaches 9 million. The magnitude of this problem is of particular concern, because of the compelling data that link hypokalemia in such patients to electrical instability of the heart and to a fatal outcome after an acute cardiac injury. Therefore, aggressive correction of hypokalemia is warranted in patients with cardiovascular disorders.

The management of heart failure and the scope for new therapies: what role for xamoterol?

1. Current therapy of heart failure leaves much to be desired. Not all patients respond, and many agents lose their effects with time. 2. Newer agents may be effective but toxic, and some which have a beneficial action when given intravenously have proved disappointing when used orally. 3. The value of digoxin in patients in sinus rhythm is open to debate, and diuretics, although useful acutely in reducing fluid overload, do not appear to improve prognosis. 4. Vasodilators increase effort capacity and reduce symptoms, possibly conferring some long-term benefit, and angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors improve symptoms and decrease mortality in a wide range of patients. 5. Positive inotropes may be effective in the short term, but they increase myocardial oxygen demand and show tachyphylaxis with no prognostic benefit. 6. Xamoterol (Corwin, Carwin, Corwil, Xamtol, ICI 118,587) is a partial sympathetic agonist with approximately 50% of the activity of a pure agonist, which provides inotropic support at rest, and protection against excess sympathetic activity on exercise. 7. It is compatible with other therapies and has shown no serious toxicity. 8. It should be considered at present as an adjunct to diuretic and/or ACE inhibitor therapy, although it may be useful alone; its role will become clearer as its effects on mortality are established.

Vasodilator and inotropic drugs for the treatment of chronic heart failure: distinguishing hype from hope

During the past 10 years, more than 80 orally active vasodilator and inotropic agents have been tested in the clinical setting to evaluate their potential utility in the treatment of chronic heart failure. Although the initial reports of all of these drugs suggested that each represented a major therapeutic advance, only three agents--digoxin, captopril and enalapril--have produced consistent long-term hemodynamic and clinical benefits in these severely ill patients. Most of the other drugs that have been tested have not (to date) distinguished themselves from placebo therapy in large-scale, controlled trials, even though these agents produce hemodynamic effects that closely resemble those seen with digitalis and the converting-enzyme inhibitors. These observations suggest that the hemodynamic derangements that characteristically accompany the development of left ventricular dysfunction cannot be considered to be the most important pathophysiologic abnormality in chronic heart failure. Although cardiac contractility is usually depressed in this disease, positive inotropic agents do not consistently improve the clinical status of these patients. Similarly, although the systemic vessels are usually markedly constricted, drugs that ameliorate this vasoconstriction do not consistently relieve symptoms, enhance exercise capacity or prolong life. Hence, correction of the central hemodynamic abnormalities seen in heart failure may not necessarily provide a rational basis for drug development, and future advances in therapy are likely to evolve only by attempting to understand and modify the basic physiologic derangements in this disorder.

Captopril. An update of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic use in hypertension and congestive heart failure

Captopril is an orally active inhibitor of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) and has been widely studied in the treatment of patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension, severe hypertension not responsive to conventional diuretic/beta-adrenoceptor blocker/vasodilator regimens, and patients with chronic congestive heart failure refractory to treatment with a diuretic and digitalis. In patients with mild or moderate essential hypertension, titrated low doses of captopril used alone or in conjunction with a diuretic are similar in efficacy to usual doses of hydrochlorothiazide, chlorthalidone, or beta-adrenoceptor blocking drugs, as well as to the other ACE inhibitors. In addition, captopril improved well-being to a greater extent than methyldopa or propranolol in a study designed specifically to determine the effect of treatment on the quality of life of patients with mild or moderate essential hypertension. The earlier demonstrated efficacy of captopril, used with a diuretic and often also with a beta-adrenoceptor blocking drug, in the treatment of severe hypertension refractory to conventional 'triple therapy' has been confirmed in more recent trials which illustrate the generally marked antihypertensive effect of captopril-containing regimens in such patients. Results of initial trials in patients with scleroderma are promising, with control of hypertension and stabilization of renal function in these patients when treated at an early stage of the disease. Several comparative and long term trials of captopril in patients with chronic congestive heart failure refractory to treatment with a diuretic/digitalis regimen clearly demonstrate that initial haemodynamic improvement is maintained and correlates with clinical benefit. A tendency for overall clinical response to captopril to be better than the response to prazosin, hydralazine, nisoldipine or enalapril has been reported. Results of a multicentre comparison with digoxin and placebo indicate that captopril is a suitable alternative to digoxin in patients with mild to moderate heart failure who are receiving maintenance diuretic therapy. The tolerability of captopril has now been studied in many thousands of patients involved in formalized trials and the early impression of poor tolerability can no longer be justified. The use of generally lower dosages of captopril in patients with normal or slightly impaired renal function has resulted in a generally low incidence of rash (0.5 to 4%), dysgeusia (0.1 to 3%), proteinuria (0.5%), neutropenia (0.3% during first 3 months) and symptomatic hypotension (0.1 to 3%). Cough is an infrequent but troublesome effect resulting from ACE inhibition.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

When and how to use angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition in congestive heart failure

Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors have been found effective in the treatment of congestive heart failure (CHF) and have been recommended as the first choice of vasodilator therapy by some observers. Favorable hemodynamic responses, apparent both at rest and during exercise, result from a considerable reduction in both systemic and pulmonary vascular resistance, apparently due to both the arterial and venodilating effects of these agents. In addition, the recently reported results of the Cooperative North Scandinavian Enalapril Survival Study demonstrate that ACE inhibitors reduce mortality rates in patients with CHF. The etiology of heart failure does not seem to predict clinical response to ACE inhibitors, nor do acute resting and exercise hemodynamic responses. A weak relation has been found between plasma renin activity and short-term hemodynamic and clinical responses, but this association is not evident over the long term. Therefore, a trial of therapy with ACE inhibitors is necessary to judge efficacy in an individual patient with advanced CHF symptoms. Two such agents--captopril and enalapril--are available. The former has a more rapid onset and shorter duration of action, whereas the latter may be given on a twice-daily basis, simplifying chronic therapy.

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors

There is convincing evidence that ACE inhibitors, alone or in combination with a diuretic, effectively lower blood pressure in patients with all grades of essential or renovascular hypertension and that they are of particular benefit as adjunctive therapy in patients with congestive heart failure. The hemodynamic, hormonal and clinical effects of the presently available ACE inhibitors, captopril and enalapril, are comparable and their side effect profiles are extremely favorable. One important difference between the two oral ACE inhibitors, however, is their pharmacokinetics; enalapril's action is slower to begin and is of longer duration. Compared with other agents, ACE inhibitors offer important advantages, among them an improved feeling of well being. It is, therefore, expected that ACE inhibitors will gain greater acceptance by patients and physicians in the future.

Identification of hyponatremia as a risk factor for the development of functional renal insufficiency during converting enzyme inhibition in severe chronic heart failure

To identify patients with severe chronic heart failure who are at greatest risk of developing functional renal insufficiency during converting enzyme inhibition, creatinine clearance was measured in 59 patients before and after long-term therapy with captopril (39 patients) or enalapril (20 patients), while digitalis and diuretic therapy was kept constant. Creatinine clearance increased or remained constant in 33 of the 59 patients (Group I), but declined in the remaining 26 patients (Group II). The two groups were similar with respect to the cause of heart failure, pretreatment renal function and all pretreatment hemodynamic variables. Patients in Group II, however, had lower values for serum sodium concentration (134.8 +/- 1.0 versus 137.0 +/- 0.6 mmol/liter) and higher values for plasma renin activity (10.6 +/- 3.4 versus 3.0 +/- 0.5 ng/ml per hour), received larger doses of furosemide (108 +/- 11 versus 84 +/- 6 mg/day), were more frequently diabetic (42 versus 15%) and were more frequently treated with enalapril (50 versus 21%) than were patients in Group I (all p less than 0.05). By stepwise logistic analysis, only hyponatremia (or an elevated plasma renin activity) and enalapril therapy independently predicted the decline in creatinine clearance during converting enzyme inhibition. These observations could not be explained by changes in systemic blood pressure. In patients with a normal serum sodium concentration (greater than or equal to 137 mmol/liter), creatinine clearance increased with captopril (+21%, p less than 0.05), but not with enalapril (-6%, p = NS).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Preservation of glomerular filtration rate in human heart failure by activation of the renin-angiotensin system

When renal perfusion pressure is reduced in experimentally induced low-output states, glomerular filtration rate is preserved by angiotensin II-mediated efferent arteriolar vasoconstriction, but available evidence in man suggests that angiotensin II supports renal function only to the extent that it preserves systemic blood pressure. We performed simultaneous assessments of cardiac and renal function in 56 patients with severe chronic heart failure before and after 1 to 3 months of converting-enzyme inhibition. Among the 29 patients with a pretreatment renal perfusion pressure under 70 mm Hg, patients with preserved renal function (creatinine clearance greater than 50 ml/min/1.73 m2) had markedly elevated values for plasma renin activity (11.8 +/- 3.8 ng/ml/hr) and showed a significant decline in creatinine clearance after converting-enzyme inhibition (61.1 +/- 3.0 to 45.9 +/- 5.3 ml/min/1.73 m2; p less than .05). In contrast, although similar with respect to all pretreatment demographic, hemodynamic, and clinical variables, patients with a creatinine clearance under 50 ml/min/1.73 m2 had low values for plasma renin activity (3.4 +/- 0.8 ng/ml/hr) and, despite similar drug-induced decreases in systemic blood pressure, showed no change in creatinine clearance after therapy with captopril or enalapril (32.6 +/- 2.5 to 41.4 +/- 3.8 ml/min/1.73 m2). Changes in creatinine clearance varied linearly and inversely with pretreatment values for plasma renin activity (r = - .64, p less than .001); converting-enzyme inhibition effectively abolished the pretreatment difference in renal function seen in the high- and low-renin subgroups. In the 27 patients with a renal perfusion pressure of 70 mm Hg or greater, creatinine clearance did not vary significantly with plasma renin activity and was not altered by therapy.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The role of vasodilator therapy in the treatment of severe chronic heart failure

The rationale for the use of vasodilating agents in the treatment of congestive heart failure is to reverse the systemic vasoconstriction that characterises patients with this disorder, and which may further limit cardiac performance. Nitrates were the first vasodilators used, followed by arterial vasodilators (hydralazine, minoxidil), alpha-adrenergic blockers (prazosin, trimazosin) and, more recently, calcium antagonists, ACE inhibitors, beta-agonists and phosphodiesterase inhibitors. The choice of vasodilator should be based on consideration of overall benefit-risk profiles. Consideration of pharmacological action together with classification of patients into haemodynamic subsets has been used as a basis from which to initiate vasodilator therapy. However, such a classification may not lead to a logical choice of drug and there is no evidence to suggest that patients so selected do better when given long term treatment with peripherally specific drugs than with agents that are not tailored to pretreatment haemodynamic variables. Moreover, changes in central haemodynamics after administration of specific vasodilator drugs may differ from those expected on the basis of their presumed actions on the peripheral vasculature. Dosage requirements are difficult to predict with many vasodilator drugs. Traditionally, such requirements have been established by titrating vasodilating drugs to achieve an arbitrarily defined haemodynamic response. However, there is little correlation between haemodynamic end-points and clinical efficacy in patients with heart failure, and short and long term haemodynamic responses to vasodilator drugs are not necessarily related. Drug-specific haemodynamic and clinical tolerance occurs during the course of treatment with all vasodilator drugs; the extent and frequency with which it develops differs between agents. Tolerance is thought to arise from a reduction in drug receptor affinity and/or density or activation of counter-regulatory forces (mainly neurohormonal) that limit the magnitude of vasodilatation that can be achieved. Development of tolerance to a single agent does not usually preclude efficacy of other agents. ACE inhibitors have been associated with a relatively low incidence of tolerance. This may relate to their natriuretic effect and ability to decrease the degree of neurohormonal activation, actions not shared by other vasodilators. Tolerance is the principal reason for failure of prazosin and nitrates as therapeutic agents in severe chronic heart failure.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)