Liver involvement in patients with coeliac disease: proof of causality using IgA/anti-TG2 colocalisation techniques

Gastrointestinal and Hepatobiliary Manifestations Associated with Untreated Celiac Disease in Adults and Children: A Narrative Overview

Celiac disease (CeD) is a chronic inflammatory disease of the small intestine, produced by ingesting dietary gluten products in susceptible people. Gluten causes an impairment of the mucosal surface and, consequently, an abnormal absorption of nutrients. Although malabsorption of essential nutrients is a major risk factor for various CeD-associated morbidities, genetic, immunological, and environmental factors also play an important role. The clinical presentation of CeD widely varies and can range from asymptomatic to full-blown symptoms due to the multi-system nature of CeD. The typical gastrointestinal (GI) manifestations of CeD include abdominal pain, diarrhea, bloating, and weight loss, but several hepatobiliary manifestations and a poor nutritional status have also been described. Currently, a gluten-free diet (GFD) is the only current evidence-based treatment that leads to the complete recovery of mucosal damage and the reversibility of its progression. Conversely, undiagnosed CeD might have severe consequences in children as well as in adult patients. This narrative overview aims to characterize the GI and hepatobiliary manifestations, nutritional deficiencies, and delayed pediatric development associated with unrecognized CeD in order to identify it promptly. Moreover, the role of GFD and how it could prevent long-term complications of CeD are described.

Prevalence of celiac disease in patients with liver diseases: a systematic review and meta-analyses

OBJECTIVES

A subset of patients with celiac disease (CeD) have liver involvement in the form of hypertransaminasemia, liver cirrhosis and autoimmune hepatitis. We conducted a systematic review with meta-analyses to determine pooled prevalence of CeD in patients with cryptogenic cirrhosis, all-cause cirrhosis, cryptogenic hypertransaminasemia, and all-cause hypertransaminasemia.

METHODS

We searched PubMed and EMBASE up to January 2022. Cross-sectional, case-control and prospective cohort studies performing serological tests and/or intestinal biopsy for CeD on patients with cryptogenic cirrhosis, all-cause cirrhosis, cryptogenic hypertransaminasemia and all-cause hypertransaminasemia were included, to calculate pooled estimates of seroprevalence and prevalence of biopsy-confirmed CeD in these four groups.

RESULTS

Of 6,871 articles screened, 20 articles were included finally in three meta-analyses for cryptogenic cirrhosis, all-cause cirrhosis and cryptogenic hypertransaminasemia. For the all-cause hypertransaminasemia group, a qualitative review of four studies was done instead of a meta-analysis, due to significant differences in studies. The pooled prevalence (95%CI) of biopsy-confirmed CeD, in cryptogenic cirrhosis was 4.6%(2.2-7.5%) while pooled prevalence of biopsy-confirmed CeD in all-cause cirrhosis was 0.8%(0-3.4%). Pooled prevalence of biopsy-confirmed CeD in cryptogenic hypertransaminasemia was 5.7%(3.2-8.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

Nearly one in 20 patients each with cryptogenic cirrhosis and cryptogenic hypertransaminasemia have CeD, hence they should both be considered high-risk groups for CeD. While prevalence of CeD in all-cause cirrhosis is similar to that in general population, it may be worth screening them for CeD as liver pathology has potential for reversal in them.

Bi-directional Relationship Between Celiac Disease and Liver Chemistries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

AIMS

Previous studies have reported conflicting results regarding prevalence of elevated LC (2-70%) in celiac disease (CD). This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the prevalence of elevated LC at time of CD diagnosis and associated response to GFD. We also report the prevalence of CD in patients with unexplained elevation of LC.

METHODS

Studies assessing LC (aspartate aminotransferase [AST] and alanine aminotransferase [ALT]) in CD patients were eligible. Studies with < 50 cases or in pediatric populations were excluded.

RESULTS

In total, 20 studies assessing prevalence of elevated LC in 4,265 participants with newly diagnosed CD (mean age = 35.6 ± 6.5 years, 69.8% female) were included. Pooled prevalence of elevated LC was 18.7% (95% CI 13.8-24.8; I2 = 95%). Normalization of elevated LC was seen in 83.1% (95% CI 73.4-89.7; I2 = 79%, 11 studies) of patients after GFD. On meta-regression, age at CD diagnosis, gender, and Marsh grading were not associated with elevated LC. Among 979 participants (7 studies) with unexplained elevation of LC, pooled seroprevalence and biopsy-proven CD was 6.4% (95% CI 2.9-10.3, I2 = 71%) and 4.5% (95% CI 2.6-7.7, I2 = 67%), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Elevated LC are seen in approximately one-fifth of patients at CD diagnosis with majority normalizing after GFD. Age, gender, and degree of intestinal damage are not predictive of elevated LC. In the appropriate clinical scenario, liver tests should be serially monitored in CD reserving workup for additional causes after a trial of GFD. Patients with unexplained elevation of liver tests should be screened for celiac disease.

A new double immunohistochemistry method to detect mucosal anti-transglutaminase IgA deposits in coeliac children

BACKGROUND

Intestinal transglutaminase (TG2) IgA deposits represent early marker of coeliac disease (CeD) and can predict the evolution towards intestinal atrophy.

AIMS

To validate a double immunohistochemistry method for the determination of intestinal TG2 IgA deposits on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded biopsies.

METHODS

Immunohistochemistry was tested on: 1) children with overt CeD [persistently positive serum IgA anti-tissue transglutaminase type 2 (TGA-IgA) with moderate or low titer, and histological findings of CeD]; 2) potential CeD (persistently positive serum TGA-IgA and normal intestinal mucosa) and 3) controls (negative serum TGA-IgA and normal intestinal mucosa).

RESULTS

Samples from 61 children were analyzed (32 overt CeD, 14 potential CeD, and 15 controls). Deposits appeared as focal, multifocal, or confluent extracellular foci of red and brown staining colocalization in the sub-epithelium and around mucosal vessels. Deposits were present in all 32 children with overt CeD and in 9/14 potential CeD. Deposits were never observed in the 15 controls. Patients with higher serum level of TGA-IgA and with mucosal atrophy showed mostly a multifocal/diffuse pattern of deposits distribution. The bulb appeared most severely involved. In potential CeD deposits showed mainly a focal distribution.

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate double immunohistochemistry as promising diagnostic tool to improve diagnosis of CeD.