Peptic duodenitis--does it exist in the second part of the duodenum?

Identification of distinctive clinical significance in hospitalized patients with endoscopic duodenal mucosal lesions

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Duodenitis is not infrequent finding in patient undergoing endoscopy. However, hospitalized patients have a higher incidence of secondary duodenal mucosal lesions that might be related with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection, tuberculosis, immunologic disorders, or other rare infections. We aimed to identify clinicopathologic features of duodenal mucosal lesions in hospitalized patients.

METHODS

All hospitalized patients having duodenal mucosal lesions were identified by endoscopic registration data and pathologic data query from 2011 to 2014. The diagnostic index was designed to be sensitive; however, a detailed review of medical record and endoscopic findings was undertaken to improve specificity. Secondary duodenal lesion was defined as having specific reason to explain the duodenal lesion.

RESULTS

Among 6,334 hospitalized patients have undergone upper endoscopy, endoscopic duodenal mucosal lesions was detected in 475 patients. Secondary duodenal lesions was 21 patients (4.4%) and the most frequent secondary cause was IBD (n = 7). The mean age of secondary group was significantly lower than that in primary group (42.3 ± 18.9 years vs. 58.5 ± 16.8 years, p = 0.00), and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were less frequently used in secondary group, but there was no differences of gender or presence of Helicobacter pylori. The involvement of distal part of duodenum including postbulbitis or panduodenitis was more frequently detected in secondary group than in primary group. By multivariate regression analysis, younger age of 29 years and the disease extent were significant predictors for the secondary mucosal lesions.

CONCLUSIONS

Secondary duodenal mucosal lesions with different pathophysiology, such as IBD or CMV infection, are rare. Disease extent and age seems the most distinctive feature of secondary duodenal mucosal lesions.

Analysis of Biopsies From Duodenal Bulbs of All Endoscopy Patients Increases Detection of Abnormalities but has a Minimal Effect on Diagnosis of Celiac Disease

BACKGROUND & AIMS

In patients with positive results from serologic tests for celiac disease, analysis of tissues samples from the duodenal bulb, in addition to those from other parts of the small bowel, might increase the diagnostic yield. However, biopsies are not routinely collected from the duodenal bulb because of concerns that villous atrophy detected there could be caused by other disorders (Brunner glands or peptic duodenitis, gastric metaplasia, shorter villi, or lymphoid follicles). We investigated whether analysis of biopsies from duodenal bulbs of all patients undergoing endoscopy (a population with a low probability for celiac disease) increases diagnoses of celiac disease.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of data from 679 patients (63% female; mean age, 50 years) from whom duodenal bulb and small bowel biopsies were collected during endoscopy at 3 Mayo Clinic sites, from January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2011. Records were reviewed for age, sex, pathology findings, serology test results (HLA DQ2 or DQ), indications for biopsy analyses, and adherence to a gluten-free diet. Patients with celiac disease were identified on the basis of increased intraepithelial lymphocytosis, with or without villous atrophy and crypt hyperplasia, and results from serology tests. Findings from duodenal bulbs were compared with diagnoses using the Fisher exact test.

RESULTS

Of all patients undergoing endoscopy, 16 patients (2%) were found to have celiac disease. Analysis of the duodenal bulb biopsies identified 1 patient (0.1%) with celiac disease limited to this region. Of 399 patients whose celiac serology was not known before endoscopic examination, only 2 patients had histologic changes consistent with celiac disease but not limited to duodenal bulb. Abnormal duodenal histology was detected in 265 patients (39%), most commonly in the bulb (n = 241; P < .0001). Of abnormal bulb histologies, chronic peptic duodenitis was most common (observed in 114 patients, 47%). In patients with a normal distal duodenum (n = 576), the duodenal bulb had abnormal histology in 162 (28%).

CONCLUSIONS

In a low pretest probability cohort, separate sampling of the duodenal bulb had minimal effect on celiac disease detection. Abnormal histologic findings are more commonly detected in the duodenal bulb; although they do not seem to impair identification of celiac disease, their clinical implications are unclear.

Gastrointestinal pathology in celiac disease: a case series of 150 consecutive newly diagnosed patients

The main histologic feature of celiac disease is increased intraepithelial lymphocytes (IELs) with or without villous atrophy of the duodenal mucosa. The aim of this study was to document a broad range of additional morphologic changes in intestinal mucosa biopsy specimens from patients with celiac disease. Our cohort comprised 150 patients with positive tissue transglutaminase serologic findings; 7 were at Corazza stage A1, 58 at stage B1, and 85 at stage B2. IEL counts per 100 epithelial cells ranged from 34 to 156 (mean, 88.6); a significant neutrophilic infiltrate was present in 85 cases (56.7%); eosinophil count ranged from 3 to 50 per high-power field (mean, 14.6). Additional findings included morphologic changes in enterocytes in 68.7%, subepithelial collagen thickening in 45.3%, and associated lymphocytic gastritis in 30.4% of patients. We demonstrated that these underrecognized features, which can be misleading, are not uncommon in celiac disease and were positively associated with more advanced stages of the disease (P < .0001).

Noncoeliac enteropathy: the differential diagnosis of villous atrophy in contemporary clinical practice

BACKGROUND

Duodenal villous atrophy (DVA) is a key diagnostic finding in coeliac disease (CD). However, the differential diagnosis for this finding is broad.

AIM

To identify conditions causing noncoeliac enteropathy (NCE) with villous atrophy and methods to differentiate between CD and NCE in clinical practice.

METHODS

Through record review we identified patients with DVA due to conditions other than CD. Patient demographics, clinical features and relevant investigations were compared with CD patients. Rates of CD misdiagnosis, and response to treatments were recorded.

RESULTS

Thirty cases of NCE were identified with ten different aetiologies. Unspecified immune-mediated enteropathy was the most common aetiology; affecting 10 patients. Gastrointestinal symptoms were more common in NCE than those in CD patients (P < 0.01). Twenty of the 24 NCE patients tested were HLA-DQ2/DQ8 negative. Twenty-six NCE patients were negative for IgA tissue transglutaminase (tTG) (P = 0.0001). Intraepithelial lymphocytosis was absent in 10 (33.3%) patients. Twenty-one NCE patients initially misdiagnosed with CD and one with gluten intolerance were prescribed a gluten free diet (GFD). Fifteen of 22 had repeat biopsy and none showed histological improvement.

CONCLUSIONS

Although coeliac disease is the most common cause of DVA, noncoeliac enteropathy is not rare and may easily be mistaken for coeliac disease. Noncoeliac enteropathy is suggested by a normal initial tTG (87%), lack of intraepithelial lymphocytosis on biopsy, and lack of histological response to a gluten free diet. Subjective response to gluten free diet has poor predictive value for coeliac disease. Noncoeliac enteropathy can often be confirmed by negative HLA-DQ2/DQ8 testing and targeted investigations can ascertain a definitive aetiology in most cases.

Proximal small-bowel mucosal villous intraepithelial lymphocytes

Small-bowel biopsies are routinely obtained from adult patients as a screening tool to evaluate the possibility of gluten sensitivity (GS). Previous morphological criteria of GS including completely flattened villi are usually absent. In the context of screening for GS, an altered distribution density pattern of villous intraepithelial lymphocytes (IELs) is probably the most sensitive morphological feature to suggest the possibility of GS and prompt the initiation of further medical evaluation. Altered villous IEL density distribution is a more sensitive screening feature than villous IEL counts. With increased small-bowel GS screening biopsies, occasional adults without GS with complete villous flattening and numerous villous IELs are encountered. These patients are usually incorrectly diagnosed with GS. However, they do not respond to a gluten-free diet and slowly improve over months.

Biopsy assessment of drug efficacy in the gastrointestinal tract

When using biopsy pathology in clinical pharmacology to assess drug efficacy in the gastrointestinal tract, a number of questions must be answered: Is the biopsy necessary or more effective than macroscopic views by endoscopy? Can we extract maximal information from the specimen? Are there surrogate serum or other markers that give an overall measure of disease and/or improvement? Indeed, clinicopathological correlation is of paramount importance. If biopsy is to be used, it is important to utilize appropriate scoring systems. Many grading systems use continuous spectra, which are ordinal categorical variables and therefore a grading system of assigned 'numbers' which cannot be used in processes that require continuous variables such as linear regression. The use of grading vs a 'true' score with real numbers must be carefully considered, the site and number of biopsies must be precisely chosen and interobserver reproducibility of results evaluated before undertaking drug trials. Immunocytochemistry and in situ hybridization, however, can provide quantifiable molecular information related to mechanisms of drug action. The biopsy is of significant value as it is a true in vivo assessment if the above caveats are taken into account. However, further work is needed to determine sound histological criteria to assess the efficacy of drugs for use in gastrointestinal disease.

The significance of routine duodenal biopsies in pediatric patients undergoing upper intestinal endoscopy

GOALS

To determine the significance of performing routine duodenal biopsies during upper intestinal endoscopy in a pediatric population and to evaluate their contribution to the overall diagnosis.

BACKGROUND

Performing duodenal biopsy during every upper endoscopy regardless of the indication for endoscopy and the macroscopic findings, is a controversial topic. Advocates of performing routine biopsies argue that unexpected pathology such as villous atrophy, may have significant clinical implications. Opponents argue that the yield of performing a biopsy on an apparently normal mucosa is low.

STUDY

Duodenal biopsies, routinely taken from 201 pediatric patients during upper endoscopy over a 26-month period were retrospectively reviewed. Duodenal biopsies taken during this period for suspected mucosal lesions were not included in the analysis. Indications for endoscopy included suspected peptic disease, gastroesophageal reflux, unexplained vomiting, abdominal pain, iron deficiency anemia and Crohn disease.

RESULTS

Of the 201 sets of biopsies reviewed, 159 (79.1%) were normal, 7 had insufficient material for evaluation and 35 (17.4%) carried abnormalities that included: 10 Giardia lamblia (4.9%), 13 mild chronic inflammation (6.5%), and 8 increased intraepithelial lymphocytes (3.9%). Two biopsies showed mixed acute and chronic inflammation, 1 showed lymphatic dilatation and 1 had a mild mucosal lesion. The risk for microscopic pathology in the duodenum was higher when Helicobacter pylori was present in the gastric biopsy (25.98% vs. 12.16% P < 0.02). The negative predictive value of a normal appearing duodenal mucosa was 81.5%, implying that a normal appearing mucosa does not rule out pathology. No complications were encountered in our series.

CONCLUSION

We suggest that the inclusion of routine duodenal biopsies as part of upper endoscopy in pediatric patients should be considered favorably. This practice may yield additional pathologic findings that otherwise could have been missed. It should be done regardless of the indication for endoscopy or the gross appearance of the mucosa. This practice does not increase the risk of the procedure.

Morphologic features suggestive of gluten sensitivity in architecturally normal duodenal biopsy specimens

We studied small bowel biopsy specimens with architecturally normal villi from 78 adult patients with potential gluten sensitivity (GS) and correlated them with outcome to characterize morphologic features that would allow a pathologist to suggest GS. No patient had a previous GS diagnosis. Twelve study patients had GS. The mean number of intraepithelial lymphocytes (IELs) per 20 enterocytes from the tips of 5 random villi was significantly greater in GS than non-GS biopsy samples, but the groups overlapped significantly, making the number diagnostically useful only when markedly increased. Crypt mitoses counts had similar relationships. Twelve patients had an even distribution of IELs along villus sides and over tips (3/66 [5%] non-GS patients, 9/12 [75%] GS patients). Non-GS patients had a decrescendo pattern of IELs along the sides of villi. Architecturally normal small bowel biopsy specimens with an appreciable, continuous, even distribution of IELs along the sides and tips of villi and a mean of 12 or more IELs in the tips of several villi are suggestive of GS. Pathologists should be watchful for these morphologic features in small bowel biopsy specimens to suggest GS.