Admission to hospital for road trauma in patients with diabetes mellitus

A Comprehensive Systematic Review of Data Linkage Publications on Diabetes in Australia

Aims

Our study aimed to identify the common themes, knowledge gaps and to evaluate the quality of data linkage research on diabetes in Australia.

Methods

This systematic review was developed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (the PRISMA Statement). Six biomedical databases and the Australian Population Health Research Network (PHRN) website were searched. A narrative synthesis was conducted to comprehensively identify the common themes and knowledge gaps. The guidelines for studies involving data linkage were used to appraise methodological quality of included studies.

Results

After screening and hand-searching, 118 studies were included in the final analysis. Data linkage publications confirmed negative health outcomes in people with diabetes, reported risk factors for diabetes and its complications, and found an inverse association between primary care use and hospitalization. Linked data were used to validate data sources and diabetes instruments. There were limited publications investigating healthcare expenditure and adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in people with diabetes. Regarding methodological assessment, important information about the linkage performed was under-reported in included studies.

Conclusions

In the future, more up to date data linkage research addressing costs of diabetes and its complications in a contemporary Australian setting, as well as research assessing ADRs of recently approved antidiabetic medications, are required.

Diabetes and collision risk. A meta-analysis and meta-regression

AIMS

The main objective of this study was to see whether diabetes is associated with an increased collision risk and to test the effect of age and gender on the overall collision risk for diabetes drivers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-eight studies were included in meta-analysis, using mean age, gender, continent and the prevalence of fatal road incidents as covariates.

RESULTS

The collision risk for diabetes drivers was small and not statistically significant - RR = 1.11 (1.01-1.23) with a prediction interval (PI) or 0.77-1.65. Age and gender were not associated with an increased overall risk. Insulin-dependent diabetes patients had a slightly increased effect size compared with the overall diabetes population, but the effect was not statistically significant. European diabetes drivers had a lower collision risk compared with their North American counterparts, the main cause being the difference of collision risk in the countries in which the studies were performed.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, diabetes patients do not have a statistically significant increased risk for unfavourable traffic events. Old age and insulin-dependent patients tend to have a higher risk. Advances in diabetes care, associated with advances in road safety regulations, and automotive industry have not decreased significantly the collision risk in the last 50 years for drivers with diabetes.

Traumatic injuries in patients with diabetes mellitus

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is associated with increased in-hospital morbidity and mortality in patients sustained traumatic injuries. Identification of risk factors of traumatic injuries that lead to hospital admissions and death in DM patients is crucial to set effective preventive strategies. We aimed to conduct a traditional narrative literature review to describe the role of hypoglycemia as a risk factor of driving and fall-related traumatic injuries. DM poses significant burden as a risk factor and predictor of worse outcomes in traumatic injuries. Although there is no consensus on the impact and clear hazards of hyperglycemia in comparison to the hypoglycemia, both extremes of DM need to be carefully addressed and taken into consideration for proper management. Moreover, physicians, patients, and concerned authorities should be aware of all these potential hazards to share and establish the right management plans.

Road traffic accidents and diabetes: insulin use does not determine risk

AIMS

Progressive restrictions placed on insulin-treated patients with diabetes exclude them from driving group 2 and class C1 and D1 vehicles. This reflects an assumption that an increased risk of hypoglycaemia in these patients will cause road traffic accidents. These restrictions have been implemented without any consistent evidence that this is the case. The aim of the study was therefore to investigate whether the rate of road traffic collisions in insulin-treated patients was higher than that of the non-diabetic population using a population register-based study.

METHODS

A historical cohort study combined information from the Devon and Cornwall Constabulary database on road traffic collisions with the district wide retinal screening database, to provide an anonymized matched database of road traffic collisions in the diabetic population. Accident rates were calculated in the diabetic population and compared to rates in the non-diabetic population using relative risks.

RESULTS

The estimated overall annual accident rate for the non-diabetic population was 1469 per 100,000 vs. 856 per 100,000 for the diabetic population as a whole (Chi-squared, P < 0.001). On stratification of the groups by age, within the insulin-treated group there was no significant difference in the accident rate compared to the non-diabetic population, with relative risks between 0.51 [confidence interval (CI) 0.25-1.05] and 1.13 (CI 0.88-1.46).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that insulin-treated patients as a group do not pose an increased risk to road safety. They reiterate the need for an individualized risk-based assessment when considering driving restrictions.

Vision impairment and driving

Driving is the primary mode of travel in many countries. It facilitates the performance of routine daily activities and is thus integral with the concept of quality of life. Vision is inarguably a fundamental component of safe driving. Drivers with certain eye conditions reduce their driving exposure and restrict their driving to the safest times, yet there is preliminary evidence that some eye conditions increase the risk of crashes. Visual acuity is only weakly related to crash involvement, whereas peripheral vision appears to play a more critical role. Color vision deficiency by itself is not a threat to safe driving. Based on the current literature, it is unclear whether other types of visual sensory impairment have a significant impact on driving safety and performance. Tests of visual attention and processing speed show great promise as methods of identifying high-risk drivers. There is a serious need for well-designed studies in key practical areas, such as the safety of low-vision drivers who use bioptic telescopes, the impact of monocular vision impairment on safety, and the effectiveness of vision rescreening policies after initial licensure. For ophthalmologists to guide patients about driving fitness, valid and reliable assessment tools must be developed and made widely available.

Diabetes and driving: towards equitable, evidence-based decision-making

In January 1998, the British government introduced new restrictions on licensing of people with insulin-treated diabetes mellitus to drive. These restrictions were based on the second EU driver licensing directive (91/4389) and looked to be costing insulin-treated diabetic individuals their entitlement to drive light goods and small passenger-carrying vehicles. In response to concerns expressed by the diabetes community in Britain, the British Diabetic Association commissioned a report examining and interpreting the available evidence of accident risk in insulin-treated diabetic patients, particularly that related to unexpected hypoglycaemia. The following article is drawn from that report.

Silica, compensated silicosis, and lung cancer in Western Australian goldminers

OBJECTIVES

Silica has recently been reclassified as carcinogenic to humans based largely on the observed increase in rates of lung cancer in subjects with silicosis. Other recent reviews have arrived at different conclusions as to whether silicosis or silica itself is carcinogenic. This study aims to examine exposure-response relations between exposure to silica and subsequent silicosis and lung cancer in a cohort of goldminers.

METHODS

2,297 goldminers from Kalgoorlie in Western Australia were examined in 1961, 1974, and 1975. Data were collected on respiratory symptoms, smoking habits, and employment history. Subjects were followed up to the end of 1993. Survival analyses for lung cancer mortality and incidence of compensated silicosis were performed with age and year matched conditional logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

89% of the cohort were traced to the end of 1993. 84% of the men had smoked at some time and 66% were current smokers. 1386 deaths occurred during the follow up period, 138 from lung cancer, and 631 subjects were compensated for silicosis. A strong effect of smoking on mortality from lung cancer, and a smaller effect on the incidence of compensated silicosis was found. There was a strong effect of duration and intensity of exposure on the incidence of silicosis. The risk of mortality from lung cancer increased after compensation for silicosis. Of all direct measures of exposure to silica, only log cumulative exposure was significantly related to incidence of lung cancer, but this effect disappeared once the onset of silicosis was taken into account.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of silicosis was clearly related to exposure to silica and the onset of silicosis conferred a significant increase in risk for subsequent lung cancer, but there was no evidence that exposure to silica caused lung cancer in the absence of silicosis.

Medical conditions and motor vehicle collision injuries in older adults

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether medical conditions that can impair sensory, cognitive, or motor function increase the risk of injury due to motor vehicle collision in older drivers.

DESIGN

Case-control study.

SETTING

Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound, a large prepaid health plan.

PARTICIPANTS

Group Health members age 65 or older who were licensed drivers in 5 counties. Cases were injured while driving during 1987 or 1988. Controls were matched to cases on age, gender, and county of residence but experienced no such injury during the study years.

MEASUREMENTS

The outcome was injury requiring medical care due to a police-investigated motor vehicle collision. Risk factors evaluated included selected medical conditions active within the previous 3 years, as determined from the medical record.

MAIN RESULTS

Injury risk was 2.6-fold higher in older diabetic drivers (95% CI: 1.4-4.7), especially those treated with insulin (odds ratio [OR] = 5.8, 95% CI: 1.2-28.7) or oral hypoglycemic agents (OR = 3.1, 95% CI: 0.9-11.0), those with diabetes for over 5 years (OR = 3.9, 95% CI: 1.7-8.7), and those with both diabetes and coronary heart disease (OR = 8.0, 95% CI: 1.7-37.7). Increases were also found for older drivers with coronary artery disease (OR = 1.4), depression (OR = 1.7), alcohol abuse (OR = 2.1), or falls (OR = 1.4), but these associations could easily have arisen by chance.

CONCLUSIONS

Counseling about driving risks may be warranted for certain elderly diabetic drivers. Further research is needed to determine whether transient hypoglycemia or long-term complications explain these effects.

Diabetes and job performance: an empirical investigation

There are approximately 11 million people in the United States with diabetes, and the numbers are increasing by 6% annually. Still, the relationship between diabetes and job performance remains unclear and marked by bias. To help clarify this relationship, a multicriterion job-performance rating scale was developed to rate task behaviors, interpersonal behaviors, down-time behaviors, and hazardous behaviors. A volunteer sample of 53 subjects was selected from people with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) and non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). All subjects were rated individually by a supervisor, who also rated the norm for the work group. The norm rating was used to determine a norm-referenced control group. The subjects were rated better than the norm in all categories and on all criteria: composite job performance (P < .001), task behaviors (P < .01), interpersonal behaviors (P < .01), down-time behaviors (P < .05), and hazardous behaviors (P < .001).

Employment problems and diabetes

A survey of employment problems in a random sample of diabetic patients and a group of control subjects aged 17-65 years was carried out in eight centres in the UK. Data were linked to information collected from patients' diabetic clinic notes relating to the presence and treatment of any diabetic complications and quality of diabetic control. Difficulties in obtaining employment because of diabetes were reported by 13% of diabetic patients, and because of illness by 2% of control subjects (p less than 0.001). Nine percent of diabetic patients and 2% of control subjects reported having to change their job because of their illness (p less than 0.001), and 7% of people with diabetes and 2% of people without diabetes reported losing a job because of their illness (p less than 0.001). Diabetic shift workers were twice as likely as control subjects working shifts to experience problems with their job (18 vs 8%, p = 0.045). Reports of any sickness absence in the last 12 months were not significantly different for people with and without diabetes (49 vs 45%). Sickness absence in excess of 20 days in the last 12 months was more common among diabetic patients than control subjects (29 vs 16%, p less than 0.001). People with diabetes are more likely to experience problems in obtaining employment and staying employed than people without diabetes.

Type 1 diabetes and driving experience: an eight-year cohort study

The driving habits of 250 drivers with Type 1 diabetes were reviewed 8 years after a previous assessment. At least 45 patients had died and 18 patients could not be traced. A postal questionnaire of the 187 survivors elicited a response from 89%. Fifty-six patients (34%) still held an unrestricted driving licence, demonstrating that a significant proportion of diabetic drivers had not declared diabetes to the licensing authority and/or their motor insurer and continued to ignore the statutory regulations. Fewer patients held Heavy Goods Vehicle licences than 8 years previously. Twenty-four patients had ceased driving as their driving skills had diminished with advancing age and ill health. This was a voluntary decision by all but two patients whose driving licences had been revoked. Thirty-nine patients admitted to a total of 55 road traffic accidents since 1979; 9 accidents (16%) were attributed to hypoglycaemia. Although dependent on patients' honesty and the accuracy of recall, the disclosed accident rates of 4.9 per million miles driven for male drivers and 6.3 per million miles for female drivers are comparable to the accident rate of a non-diabetic driving population of similar age.