Real-world performance of blood-based proteomic profiling in first-line immunotherapy treatment in advanced stage non-small cell lung cancer

A review on trends in development and translation of omics signatures in cancer

The field of cancer genomics and transcriptomics has evolved from targeted profiling to swift sequencing of individual tumor genome and transcriptome. The steady growth in genome, epigenome, and transcriptome datasets on a genome-wide scale has significantly increased our capability in capturing signatures that represent both the intrinsic and extrinsic biological features of tumors. These biological differences can help in precise molecular subtyping of cancer, predicting tumor progression, metastatic potential, and resistance to therapeutic agents. In this review, we summarized the current development of genomic, methylomic, transcriptomic, proteomic and metabolic signatures in the field of cancer research and highlighted their potentials in clinical applications to improve diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment decision in cancer patients.

Multi-omics and artificial intelligence predict clinical outcomes of immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer patients

In recent years, various types of immunotherapy, particularly the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting programmed cell death 1 or programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1), have revolutionized the management and prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer. PD-L1 is frequently used as a biomarker for predicting the likely benefit of immunotherapy for patients. However, some patients receiving immunotherapy have high response rates despite having low levels of PD-L1. Therefore, the identification of this group of patients is extremely important to improve prognosis. The tumor microenvironment contains tumor, stromal, and infiltrating immune cells with its composition differing significantly within tumors, between tumors, and between individuals. The omics approach aims to provide a comprehensive assessment of each patient through high-throughput extracted features, promising a more comprehensive characterization of this complex ecosystem. However, features identified by high-throughput methods are complex and present analytical challenges to clinicians and data scientists. It is thus feasible that artificial intelligence could assist in the identification of features that are beyond human discernment as well as in the performance of repetitive tasks. In this paper, we review the prediction of immunotherapy efficacy by different biomarkers (genomic, transcriptomic, proteomic, microbiomic, and radiomic), together with the use of artificial intelligence and the challenges and future directions of these fields.

Blood-based biomarkers in patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated with immune checkpoint blockade

The paradigm of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment has been profoundly influenced by the development of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), but the range of clinical responses observed among patients poses significant challenges. To date, analyses of tumor biopsies are the only parameter used to guide prognosis to ICI therapy. Tumor biopsies, however, are often difficult to obtain and tissue-based biomarkers are limited by intratumoral heterogeneity and temporal variability. In response, there has been a growing emphasis on the development of "liquid biopsy"‒ derived biomarkers, which offer a minimally invasive means to dynamically monitor the immune status of NSCLC patients either before and/or during the course of treatment. Here we review studies in which multiple blood-based biomarkers encompassing circulating soluble analytes, immune cell subsets, circulating tumor DNA, blood-based tumor mutational burden, and circulating tumor cells have shown promising associations with the clinical response of NSCLC patients to ICI therapy. These investigations have unveiled compelling correlations between the peripheral immune status of patients both before and during ICI therapy and patient outcomes, which include response rates, progression-free survival, and overall survival. There is need for rigorous validation and standardization of these blood-based assays for broader clinical application. Integration of multiple blood-based biomarkers into comprehensive panels or algorithms also has the potential to enhance predictive accuracy. Further research aimed at longitudinal monitoring of circulating biomarkers is also crucial to comprehend immune dynamics and resistance mechanisms and should be used alongside tissue-based methods that interrogate the tumor microenvironment to guide treatment decisions and may inform on the development of novel therapeutic strategies. The data reviewed here reinforce the opportunity to refine patient stratification, optimize treatments, and improve outcomes not only in NSCLC but also in the wider spectrum of solid tumors undergoing immunotherapy.

Molecular and translational biology of the blood-based VeriStrat® proteomic test used in cancer immunotherapy treatment guidance

INTRODUCTION

The VeriStrat® test (VS) is a blood-based assay that predicts a patient's response to therapy by analyzing eight features in a spectrum obtained from matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) analysis of human serum and plasma. In a recent analysis of the INSIGHT clinical trial (NCT03289780), it was found that the VS labels, VS Good and VS Poor, can effectively predict the responsiveness of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients to immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy. However, while VS measures the intensities of spectral features using MALDI-TOF analysis, the specific proteoforms underlying these features have not been comprehensively identified.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to identify the proteoforms that are measured by VS.

METHODS

To resolve the features obtained from the low-resolution MALDI-TOF procedure used to acquire mass spectra for VS DeepMALDI® analysis of serum was employed. This technique allowed for the identification of finer peaks within these features. Additionally, a combination of reversed-phase fractionation and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) was then used to identify the proteoforms associated with these peaks.

RESULTS

The analysis revealed that the primary constituents of the spectrum measured by VS are serum amyloid A1, serum amyloid A2, serum amyloid A4, C-reactive protein, and beta-2 microglobulin.

CONCLUSION

Proteoforms involved in host immunity were identified as significant components of these features. This newly acquired information improves our understanding of how VS can accurately predict patient response to therapy. It opens up additional studies that can expand our understanding even further.

Prospective on Imaging Mass Spectrometry in Clinical Diagnostics

Imaging mass spectrometry (IMS) is a molecular technology utilized for spatially driven research, providing molecular maps from tissue sections. This article reviews matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization (MALDI) IMS and its progress as a primary tool in the clinical laboratory. MALDI mass spectrometry has been used to classify bacteria and perform other bulk analyses for plate-based assays for many years. However, the clinical application of spatial data within a tissue biopsy for diagnoses and prognoses is still an emerging opportunity in molecular diagnostics. This work considers spatially driven mass spectrometry approaches for clinical diagnostics and addresses aspects of new imaging-based assays that include analyte selection, quality control/assurance metrics, data reproducibility, data classification, and data scoring. It is necessary to implement these tasks for the rigorous translation of IMS to the clinical laboratory; however, this requires detailed standardized protocols for introducing IMS into the clinical laboratory to deliver reliable and reproducible results that inform and guide patient care.

Potential non-invasive biomarkers in tumor immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: response and prognosis prediction

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have dramatically enhanced the treatment outcomes for diverse malignancies. Yet, only 15-60% of patients respond significantly. Therefore, accurate responder identification and timely ICI administration are critical issues in tumor ICI therapy. Recent rapid developments at the intersection of oncology, immunology, biology, and computer science have provided an abundance of predictive biomarkers for ICI efficacy. These biomarkers can be invasive or non-invasive, depending on the specific sample collection method. Compared with invasive markers, a host of non-invasive markers have been confirmed to have superior availability and accuracy in ICI efficacy prediction. Considering the outstanding advantages of dynamic monitoring of the immunotherapy response and the potential for widespread clinical application, we review the recent research in this field with the aim of contributing to the identification of patients who may derive the greatest benefit from ICI therapy.

Advances in efficacy prediction and monitoring of neoadjuvant immunotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer

The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has become mainstream in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The idea of harnessing the immune system to fight cancer is fast developing. Neoadjuvant treatment in NSCLC is undergoing unprecedented change. Chemo-immunotherapy combinations not only seem to achieve population-wide treating coverage irrespective of PD-L1 expression but also enable achieving a pathological complete response (pCR). Despite these recent advancements in neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy, not all patients respond favorably to treatment with ICIs plus chemo and may even suffer from severe immune-related adverse effects (irAEs). Similar to selection for target therapy, identifying patients most likely to benefit from chemo-immunotherapy may be valuable. Recently, several prognostic and predictive factors associated with the efficacy of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in NSCLC, such as tumor-intrinsic biomarkers, tumor microenvironment biomarkers, liquid biopsies, microbiota, metabolic profiles, and clinical characteristics, have been described. However, a specific and sensitive biomarker remains to be identified. Recently, the construction of prediction models for ICI therapy using novel tools, such as multi-omics factors, proteomic tests, host immune classifiers, and machine learning algorithms, has gained attention. In this review, we provide a comprehensive overview of the different positive prognostic and predictive factors in treating preoperative patients with ICIs, highlight the recent advances made in the efficacy prediction of neoadjuvant immunotherapy, and provide an outlook for joint predictors.

Liquid Biopsy and the Translational Bridge from the TIME to the Clinic

Research and advancing understanding of the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) is vital to optimize and direct more effective cancer immune therapy. Pre-clinical bench research is vital to better understand the genomic interplay of the TIME and immune therapy responsiveness. However, a vital key to effective translational cancer research is having a bridge of translation to bring that understanding from the bench to the bedside. Without that bridge, research into the TIME will lack an efficient and effective translation into the clinic and cancer treatment decision making. As a clinical oncologist, the purpose of this commentary is to emphasize the importance of researching and improving clinical utility of the bridge, as well as the TIME research itself.

Applications of Circulating Tumor DNA in Immune Checkpoint Inhibition: Emerging Roles and Future Perspectives

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), especially anti-programmed death 1 (PD-1)/programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) antibodies, have made dramatic progress in the treatment of lung cancer, especially for patients with cancers not driven by oncogenes. However, responses are limited to a subset of patients, and which subset of patients will optimally benefit from ICI remains unknown. With the advantage of being minimally invasive and dynamic, noninvasive biomarkers are promising candidates to predict response, monitor resistance, and track the evolution of lung cancer during ICI treatment. In this review, we focus on the application of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in plasma in immunotherapy. We examine the potential of pre- and on-treatment features of ctDNA as biomarkers, and following multiparameter analysis, we determine the potential clinical value of integrating predictive liquid biomarkers of ICIs to optimize patient management. We further discuss the role of ctDNA in monitoring treatment resistance, as well as challenges in clinical translation.

Role of mass spectrometry-based serum proteomics signatures in predicting clinical outcomes and toxicity in patients with cancer treated with immunotherapy

Immunotherapy has fundamentally changed the landscape of cancer treatment. However, only a subset of patients respond to immunotherapy, and a significant portion experience immune-related adverse events (irAEs). In addition, the predictive ability of current biomarkers such as programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) remains unreliable and establishing better potential candidate markers is of great importance in selecting patients who would benefit from immunotherapy. Here, we focus on the role of serum-based proteomic tests in predicting the response and toxicity of immunotherapy. Serum proteomic signatures refer to unique patterns of proteins which are associated with immune response in patients with cancer. These protein signatures are derived from patient serum samples based on mass spectrometry and act as biomarkers to predict response to immunotherapy. Using machine learning algorithms, serum proteomic tests were developed through training data sets from advanced non-small cell lung cancer (Host Immune Classifier, Primary Immune Response) and malignant melanoma patients (PerspectIV test). The tests effectively stratified patients into groups with good and poor treatment outcomes independent of PD-L1 expression. Here, we review current evidence in the published literature on three liquid biopsy tests that use biomarkers derived from proteomics and machine learning for use in immuno-oncology. We discuss how these tests may inform patient prognosis as well as guide treatment decisions and predict irAE of immunotherapy. Thus, mass spectrometry-based serum proteomics signatures play an important role in predicting clinical outcomes and toxicity.