Nivolumab plus rucaparib for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: results from the phase 2 CheckMate 9KD trial

Mitigating T cell DNA damage during PARP inhibitor treatment enhances antitumor efficacy

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPis) are a class of agents targeting DNA damage repair that have become standard therapy for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) and multiple other solid tumors. In addition to targeting DNA damage repair, PARPis actively modulate antitumor immune responses, with efficacy being partially dependent on T cell activity. Here, we found that patient T cells sustain DNA damage during PARPi treatment, which reduces treatment efficacy. Leveraging paired pre- and posttreatment tumor samples from a clinical trial of patients with EOC treated with neoadjuvant niraparib as monotherapy, we showed that the PARPi caused DNA damage, slowed proliferation, and increased apoptosis in T cells, which we validated both in vitro and in mouse models. A genome-wide CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats) knockout screen in primary human T cells identified PARP1 as the principal mediator of PARPi-induced T cell death. T cell-specific deletion of PARP1 or mutating Parp1 at its binding sites in transgenic mice led to reduced T cell DNA damage during PARPi treatment, resulting in improved efficacy of PARPis, alone or in combination with immune checkpoint inhibition. We then engineered PARPi-tolerant CAR T cells using cytosine base editing, which decreased PARPi-induced PARP1 trapping and led to reduced PARPi-induced DNA damage, resulting in superior antitumor efficacy in xenograft models compared with parental CAR T cells. This study highlights the relevance of PARPi-induced DNA damage to T cells and suggests opportunities to improve the efficacy of PARPis as monotherapy or in combination with immunotherapy.

Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors in cancer therapy

ABSTRACT

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (PARPis) have emerged as critical agents for cancer therapy. By inhibiting the catalytic activity of PARP enzymes and trapping them in the DNA, PARPis disrupt DNA repair, ultimately leading to cell death, particularly in cancer cells with homologous recombination repair deficiencies, such as those harboring BRCA mutations. This review delves into the mechanisms of action of PARPis in anticancer treatments, including the inhibition of DNA repair, synthetic lethality, and replication stress. Furthermore, the clinical applications of PARPis in various cancers and their adverse effects as well as their combinations with other therapies and the mechanisms underlying resistance are summarized. This review provides comprehensive insights into the role and mechanisms of PARP and PARPis in DNA repair, with a particular focus on the potential of PARPi-based therapies in precision medicine for cancer treatment.

The application of emerging immunotherapy in the treatment of prostate cancer: progress, dilemma and promise

In recent years, there has been a growing trend towards the utilization of immunotherapy techniques for the treatment of cancer. Some malignancies have acquired significant progress with the use of cancer vaccines, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and adoptive cells therapy. Scholars are exploring the aforementioned methods as potential treatments for advanced prostate cancer (PCa) due to the absence of effective adjuvant therapy to improve the prognosis of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Immunotherapy strategies have yet to achieve significant advancements in the treatment of PCa, largely attributed to the inhibitory tumor microenvironment and low mutation load characteristic of this malignancy. Hence, researchers endeavor to address these challenges by optimizing the design and efficacy of immunotherapy approaches, as well as integrating them with other therapeutic modalities. To date, studies have also shown potential clinical benefits. This comprehensive review analyzed the utilization of immunotherapy techniques in the treatment of PCa, assessing their advantages and obstacles, with the aim of providing healthcare professionals and scholars with a comprehensive understanding of the progress in this field.

Role of PARP-1 structural and functional features in PARP-1 inhibitors development

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 (PARP-1) is the key enzyme among other PARPs for post-translational modification of DNA repair proteins. It has four functional domains for DNA-binding, automodification and enzymatic activity. PARP-1 participates in poly-ADP-ribosylation of itself or other proteins during DNA damage response. It recruits reparation machinery proteins that restore native DNA sequence. PARP-1 participates in chromatin structure organization and gene expression regulation. It was shown that PARP-1-dependent regulation mechanisms affect on possible risk of carcinogenesis. Therefore, PARP-1 was proposed as a novel target for cancer treatment. Three generations of PARP-1 inhibitors had been developed depending on pharmacophore structure. To date, four PARP-1 inhibitors have been approved for cancer treatment as a chemotherapy potentiators or as a stand-alone therapy. However, different cytotoxicity effects of specific PARP-1 inhibitors were observed due to diverse PARP-1 activity in cellular processes. Moreover, cancer cells can develop resistance to PARP-1 inhibitors and decrease chemotherapy efficacy. There are promising strategies how to avoid these disadvantages including dual-targeted inhibitors and combination therapy.

Prevalence of Homologous Recombination Repair Mutations and Association with Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Solid Tumors: A Study Using the AACR Project GENIE Dataset

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Mutations in BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 (BRCAm) and other homologous recombination repair genes (HRRm) are associated with several cancers. We evaluated the prevalence and association with overall survival (OS) of somatic BRCAm and HRRm among patients with advanced solid tumors.

METHODS

We used deidentified data from the AACR GENIE Biopharma Collaborative dataset derived from patients with tumors genotyped using next-generation sequencing between 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2017. Eligible patients were aged ≥18 years diagnosed with non-small-cell lung, colorectal, breast, bladder, prostate, or pancreatic cancer, with documented BRCA/HRR somatic mutation status. The primary analysis was OS (censored at the start of poly[ADP ribose] polymerase inhibitors [PARPi]/immunotherapy) after initiation of second-line therapy since most patients had sequencing after first-line therapy.

RESULTS

Among eligible patients, 242/7022 (3.4%) had BRCAm and 477/5474 (8.7%) had HRRm. Adjusted OS HRs (95% CI) for the primary analysis (using the initiation of second-line therapy as index date) were 0.79 (0.61-1.03) with/without BRCAm (n = 116/n = 3394) and 0.83 (0.69-0.99) with/without HRRm (n = 247/n = 2656); in sensitivity analysis of patients with stage IV disease, HRs were 0.97 (0.68-1.38) with/without BRCAm (n = 58/n = 1847) and 0.92 (0.73-1.18) with/without HRRm (n = 132/n = 1488).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, BRCAm and HRRm did not show a strong association with OS, with a trend toward longer OS among patients receiving standard second-line therapies excluding PARPi/immunotherapy.

Nivolumab in Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer with and without DNA Repair Defects

PURPOSE

Despite the success of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) across various cancers, their efficacy in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) is modest, except for a subset of patients who experience significant, yet unpredictable, benefits. DNA repair defects (DRD) are associated with higher neoantigen load, which may predict response. Our study explored the potential of DRD for enhanced responsiveness to the ICI nivolumab.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a phase II, multicenter, single-arm trial evaluating nivolumab in patients with mCRPC with prior docetaxel therapy. The DRD were assessed using ctDNA. The primary endpoint was PSA50 response. Secondary endpoints included the objective response rate, radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS), and overall survival. Also, exploratory comprehensive genomic profiling was performed via whole-exome sequencing of tumor samples and matched normal tissues, alongside PD-L1 expression evaluation.

RESULTS

Among the 38 enrolled patients, DRD was identifiable in 30.5% (11/36) through ctDNA and/or whole-exome sequencing analyses. The overall PSA50 response rate was 10.5% (4/38). The PSA50 and objective response rates did not significantly differ between patients with and without DRD (18.2% vs. 8%; P = 0.57 and 50% vs. 17.6%; P = 0.27, respectively). The median PSA-PFS (1.9 vs. 2.8 months; P = 0.52) and rPFS (3.4 vs. 5.5 months; P = 0.7) were not statistically different between patients with and without DRD. Grade ≥ 3 adverse events were reported in 47.3% of participants.

CONCLUSIONS

Nivolumab has clinical activity in a subset of patients with mCRPC; however, DRD does not predict response. These results highlight the necessity of identifying new biomarkers to more accurately determine patients with mCRPC who might respond to ICIs.

PARP inhibitors in prostate cancer: clinical applications

Despite recent advancements in the treatment of metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), this disease remains lethal. A novel family of targeted pharmaceuticals known as poly-ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors has been developed to treat mCRPC patients with homologous recombination repair (HRR) gene alterations. The FDA recently approved olaparib and rucaparib for treating mCRPC patients with HRR gene alterations. Ongoing trials are investigating combination therapies involving PARP inhibitors combined with radiation, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSIs) to improve the effectiveness of PARP inhibitors and broaden the range of patients who can benefit from the treatment. This review provides an overview of the development of PARP inhibitors in prostate cancer and analyzes the mechanisms underlying their resistance.

Disulfidptosis-related subtype and prognostic signature in prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

Disulfidptosis refers to cell death caused by the accumulation and bonding of disulfide in the cytoskeleton protein of SLC7A11-high level cells under glucose deprivation. However, the role of disulfidptosis-related genes (DRGs) in prostate cancer (PCa) classification and regulation of the tumor microenvironment remains unclear.

METHODS

Firstly, we analyzed the expression and mutation landscape of DRGs in PCa. We observed the expression levels of SLC7A11 in PCa cells through in vitro experiments and assessed the inhibitory effect of the glucose transporter inhibitor BAY-876 on SLC7A11-high cells using CCK-8 assay. Subsequently, we performed unsupervised clustering of the PCa population and analyzed the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between clusters. Using machine learning techniques to select a minimal gene set and developed disulfidoptosis-related risk signatures for PCa. We analyzed the tumor immune microenvironment and the sensitivity to immunotherapy in different risk groups. Finally, we validated the accuracy of the prognostic signatures genes using single-cell sequencing, qPCR, and western blot.

RESULTS

Although SLC7A11 can increase the migration ability of tumor cells, BAY-876 effectively suppressed the viability of prostate cancer cells, particularly those with high SLC7A11 expression. Based on the DRGs, PCa patients were categorized into two clusters (A and B). The risk label, consisting of a minimal gene set derived from DEGs, included four genes. The expression levels of these genes in PCa were initially validated through in vitro experiments, and the accuracy of the risk label was confirmed in an external dataset. Cluster-B exhibited higher expression levels of DRG, representing lower risk, better prognosis, higher immune cell infiltration, and greater sensitivity to immune checkpoint blockade, whereas Cluster A showed the opposite results. These findings suggest that DRGs may serve as targets for PCa classification and treatment. Additionally, we constructed a nomogram that incorporates DRGs and clinical pathological features, providing clinicians with a quantitative method to assess the prognosis of PCa patients.

CONCLUSION

This study analyzed the potential connection between disulfidptosis and PCa, and established a prognostic model related to disulfidptosis, which holds promise as a valuable tool for the management and treatment of PCa patients.

Immunological facets of prostate cancer and the potential of immune checkpoint inhibition in disease management

Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common non-cutaneous cancer in men and a major cause of cancer-related deaths. Whereas localized PCa can be cured by surgery and radiotherapy, metastatic disease can be treated, but is not curable. Inhibition of androgen signaling remains the main therapeutic intervention for treatment of metastatic PCa, in addition to chemotherapy, radionuclide therapy and emerging targeted therapies. Although initial responses are favorable, resistance to these therapies invariably arise with development of castration resistant PCa (CRPC) and lethal phenotypes. Recent findings have implicated the crosstalk between PCa cells and the tumor microenvironment (TME) as a key factor for disease progression and metastasis, and the immune system is becoming an increasingly attractive target for therapy. Given the striking success of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in various cancer types, preclinical and clinical studies have begun to explore their potential in PCa. It has become clear that the PCa TME is largely immunosuppressive, and ICI therapy does not have efficacy for PCa. Intense effort is therefore being made in the field to understand the mechanisms of suppression and to turn the immunosuppressive TME into an immune active one that would enable ICI efficacy. Herein we examine this recent body of knowledge and how the mutational landscape of PCa integrates with an immunosuppressive TME to circumvent ICI-mediated T-cell activity and tumor killing. We then review the emerging potential success of combinatorial ICI approaches, utility of careful patient selection, and potential novel strategies to improve the efficacy of ICI for PCa therapy.

Unlocking ferroptosis in prostate cancer - the road to novel therapies and imaging markers

Ferroptosis is a distinct form of regulated cell death that is predominantly driven by the build-up of intracellular iron and lipid peroxides. Ferroptosis suppression is widely accepted to contribute to the pathogenesis of several tumours including prostate cancer. Results from some studies reported that prostate cancer cells can be highly susceptible to ferroptosis inducers, providing potential for an interesting new avenue of therapeutic intervention for advanced prostate cancer. In this Perspective, we describe novel molecular underpinnings and metabolic drivers of ferroptosis, analyse the functions and mechanisms of ferroptosis in tumours, and highlight prostate cancer-specific susceptibilities to ferroptosis by connecting ferroptosis pathways to the distinctive metabolic reprogramming of prostate cancer cells. Leveraging these novel mechanistic insights could provide innovative therapeutic opportunities in which ferroptosis induction augments the efficacy of currently available prostate cancer treatment regimens, pending the elimination of major bottlenecks for the clinical translation of these treatment combinations, such as the development of clinical-grade inhibitors of the anti-ferroptotic enzymes as well as non-invasive biomarkers of ferroptosis. These biomarkers could be exploited for diagnostic imaging and treatment decision-making.

Prostate cancer stem cells and their targeted therapies

Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common malignancy among men worldwide. Through androgen receptor signaling inhibitor (ARSI) treatment, patients eventually succumb to castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). For this, the prostate cancer stem cells (PCSCs), as a minor population of tumor cells that can promote tumor relapse, ARSI resistance, and disease progression, are gaining attention. Therefore, specific therapy targeting PCSCs has momentum. This study reviewed the identification and characterization of PCSCs and PCSC-based putative biomarkers and summarized their mechanisms of action. We further discussed clinical trials of novel therapeutic interventions focused on PCSC-related pathways, the PCSC microenvironment, cutting-edge miRNA therapy, and immunotherapy approaches from a mechanistic standpoint. This review provides updated insights into PCSC plasticity, identifying new PCSC biomarkers and optimized treatments for patients with advanced PCa.

PARP inhibitor and immune checkpoint inhibitor have synergism efficacy in gallbladder cancer

Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is an aggressive cancer with poor prognosis. PARP inhibitors (PARPi) target PARP enzymes and have shown efficacy in patients with breast cancer gene (BRCA) mutations. Immunotherapy, especially immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), has transformed cancer treatment. However, the combined impact of PARPi and ICIs in GBC remains unclear. We present a groundbreaking case of a GBC patient with BRCA2 mutations who received combination therapy with PARPi and ICIs after failing multiple lines of treatment. Next-generation sequencing (NGS-Seq) identified BRCA gene mutations. To further investigate potential mechanisms, we developed a PARP1-BRCA1-BRCA2 pathway-related risk score (PBscore) system to evaluate the impact of PARPi on the tumor immune microenvironment via RNA-Seq data. Gene expression and functional analysis identified potential mechanisms associated with the PBscore. Experimental validation assessed the impact of the combination therapy on the tumor microenvironment using multiplexed immunofluorescence imaging and immunohistochemistry in patients with BRCA gene wild type or mutations. RNA-Seq analysis revealed correlations between PBscore, immune checkpoint levels, tumor-infiltrating immune cells (TIICs), and the cancer-immunity cycle. Multiplexed immunofluorescence imaging validated that low PBscore patients might have an active tumor microenvironment. Furthermore, upon drug resistance, we observed an upregulation of negative immune checkpoints such as CEACAM1, indicating that the tumor immune microenvironment becomes suppressed after resistance. Our study revealed that PBscore could serve as a biomarker to predict immunotherapy efficacy, offering a promising alternative for BRCA2-mutated GBC patients.

Androgen receptor, PARP signaling, and tumor microenvironment: the 'perfect triad' in prostate cancer?

Aberrations in the homologous recombination repair (HRR) pathway in prostate cancer (PCa) provide a unique opportunity to develop therapeutic strategies that take advantage of the reduced tumor ability to repair DNA damage. Poly-ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (PARPi) have been shown to prolong the survival of PCa patients with HRR defects, particularly in those with Breast Cancer type 1 susceptibility protein/Breast Cancer type 2 susceptibility protein alterations. To expand the benefit of PARPi to patients without detectable HRR alterations, multiple preclinical and clinical studies are addressing potential synergies between PARPi and androgen receptor signaling inhibitors, and these strategies are also being evaluated in combination with other drugs such as immune checkpoint inhibitors. However, the effectiveness of these combining therapies could be hindered by multiple mechanisms of resistance, including also the role played by the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. In this review, we summarize the use of PARPi in PCa and the potential synergies with different molecular pathways. However, numerous unanswered questions remain, including the identification of the patient population that could benefit most from PARPi, determining whether to use PARPi as monotherapy or in combination, and finding the optimal timing of PARPi, expanding the use of genomic tests, and optimizing combination therapies.

Beyond monotherapy: An era ushering in combinations of PARP inhibitors with immune checkpoint inhibitors for solid tumors

The introduction of PARP inhibitors (PARPis) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has marked a significant shift in the treatment landscape for solid tumors. Emerging preclinical evidence and initial clinical trials have indicated that the synergistic application of PARPis and ICIs may enhance treatment efficacy and potentially improve long-term patient outcomes. Nonetheless, how to identify specific tumor types and molecular subgroups most likely to benefit from this combination remains an area of ongoing research. This review thoroughly examines current studies on the co-administration of PARPis and ICIs across various solid tumors. It explores the underlying mechanisms of action, evaluates clinical efficacy, identifies potential responder populations, and delineates common adverse events alongside strategic management approaches. The aim is to offer a detailed understanding of this combination therapy, potentially guiding future therapeutic strategies for solid tumors.

New target therapies in prostate cancer: from radioligand therapy, to PARP-inhibitors and immunotherapy

Prostate cancer (PCa) remains a significant global health challenge, particularly in its advanced stages. Despite progress in early detection and treatment, PCa is the second most common cancer diagnosis among men. This review aims to provide an overview of current therapeutic approaches and innovations in PCa management, focusing on the latest advancements and ongoing challenges. We conducted a narrative review of clinical trials and research studies, focusing on PARP inhibitors (PARPis), phosphoinositide 3 kinase-protein kinase B inhibitors, immunotherapy, and radioligand therapies (RLTs). Data was sourced from major clinical trial databases and peer-reviewed journals. Androgen deprivation therapy and androgen-receptor pathway inhibitors remain foundational in managing castration-sensitive and early-stage castration-resistant PCa (CRPC). PARPi's, such as olaparib and rucaparib, have emerged as vital treatments for metastatic CRPC with homologous recombination repair gene mutations, highlighting the importance of personalized medicine. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown clinical benefit limited to specific subgroups of PCa, demonstrating significant improvement in efficacy in patients with microsatellite instability/mismatch repair or cyclin-dependent kinase 12 alteration, highlighting the importance of focusing ongoing research on identifying and characterizing these subgroups to maximize the clinical benefits of ICIs. RLTs have shown effectiveness in treating mCRPC. Different alpha emitters (like [225Ac]PSMA) and beta emitters compounds (like [177Lu]PSMA) impact treatment differently due to their energy transfer characteristics. Clinical trials like VISION and TheraP have demonstrated positive outcomes with RLT, particularly [177Lu]PSMA-617, leading to FDA approval. Ongoing trials and future perspectives explore the potential of [225Ac]PSMA, aiming to improve outcomes for patients with mCRPC. The landscape of PCa treatment is evolving, with significant advancements in both established and novel therapies. The combination of hormonal therapies, chemotherapy, PARPis, immunotherapy, and RLTs, guided by genetic and molecular insights, opens new possibilities for personalized treatment.

Unravelling the molecular basis of PARP inhibitor resistance in prostate cancer with homologous recombination repair deficiency

Prostate cancer is a disease with heterogeneous characteristics, making its treatability and curability dependent on the cancer's stage. While prostate cancer is often indolent, some cases can be aggressive and evolve into metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), which is lethal. A significant subset of individuals with mCRPC exhibit germline and somatic variants in components of the DNA damage repair (DDR) pathway. Recently, PARP inhibitors (PARPi) have shown promise in treating mCRPC patients who carry deleterious alterations in BRCA2 and 13 other DDR genes that are important for the homologous recombination repair (HRR) pathway. These inhibitors function by trapping PARP, resulting in impaired PARP activity and increased DNA damage, ultimately leading to cell death through synthetic lethality. However, the response to these inhibitors only lasts for 3-4 months, after which the cancer becomes PARPi resistant. Cancer cells can develop resistance to PARPi through numerous mechanisms, such as secondary reversion mutations in DNA repair pathway genes, heightened drug efflux, loss of PARP expression, HRR reactivation, replication fork stability, and upregulation of Wnt/Catenin and ABCB1 pathways. Overcoming PARPi resistance is a critical and complex process, and there are two possible ways to sensitize the resistance. The first approach is to potentiate the PARPi agents through chemo/radiotherapy and combination therapy, while the second approach entails targeting different signaling pathways. This review article highlights the latest evidence on the resistance mechanism of PARPi in lethal prostate cancer and discusses additional therapeutic opportunities available for prostate cancer patients with DDR gene alterations who do not respond to PARPi.

PARP inhibitors for prostate cancer

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors have transformed the treatment landscape for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and alterations in DNA damage response genes. This has also led to widespread use of genomic testing in all patients with mCRPC. The current review will give an overview of (1) the current understanding of the interplay between DNA damage response and PARP enzymes; (2) the clinical landscape of PARP inhibitors, including the combination of PARP inhibitors with other agents such as androgen-receptor signaling agents; (3) biomarkers related to PARP inhibitor response and resistance; and (4) considerations for interpreting genomic testing results and treating patients with PARP inhibitors.

Novel Therapeutic Targets on the Horizon: An Analysis of Clinical Trials on Therapies for Bone Metastasis in Prostate Cancer

In the absence of early detection and initial treatment, prostate cancer often progresses to an advanced stage, frequently spreading to the bones and significantly impacting patients' well-being and healthcare resources. Therefore, managing patients with prostate cancer that has spread to the bones often involves using bone-targeted medications like bisphosphonates and denosumab to enhance bone structure and minimize skeletal complications. Additionally, researchers are studying the tumor microenvironment and biomarkers to understand the mechanisms and potential treatment targets for bone metastases in prostate cancer. A literature search was conducted to identify clinical studies from 2013 to 2023 that focused on pain, performance status, or quality of life as primary outcomes. The analysis included details such as patient recruitment, prior palliative therapies, baseline characteristics, follow-up, and outcome reporting. The goal was to highlight the advancements and trends in bone metastasis research in prostate cancer over the past decade, with the aim of developing strategies to prevent and treat bone metastases and improve the quality of life and survival rates for prostate cancer patients.

Development of PARP inhibitors in advanced prostate cancer

The relatively high prevalence of alterations in the homologous recombination repair (HRR) pathway described in advanced prostate cancer provides a unique opportunity to develop therapeutic strategies that take advantage of the decreased tumor ability to repair DNA damage. Poly ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors have been demonstrated to improve the outcomes of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients with HRR defects, particularly in those with BRCA1/2 alterations. To expand the benefit of PARPi to patients without detectable HRR alterations, multiple studies are addressing potential synergies between PARP inhibition (PARPi) and androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARSi), radiation, radioligand therapy, chemotherapy, or immunotherapy, and these strategies are also being evaluated in the hormone-sensitive setting. In this review, we summarize the development of PARPi in prostate cancer, the potential synergies, and combinations being investigated as well as the future directions of PARPi for the management of the disease.

PARP inhibitors alone or in combination for prostate cancer

DNA repair genomic aberrations in the Homologous Recombination pathway are identifiable in up to 25% of patients with advanced prostate cancer, making them more likely to benefit from treatment with poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) alone or in combination with other therapies, particularly when BRCA driver genomic aberrations are documented. Although several clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy of this approach, the validation of reliable biomarkers predictive of response still needs further improvement to refine patient selection. In this setting, the characterization of resistance mechanisms and the validation of novel biomarkers are critical to maximize clinical benefit and to develop novel treatment combinations to improve outcomes. In this review, we summarize the development of PARPi in prostate cancer as single agent as well as the efficacy of their combination with other drugs, and the future directions for their implementation in the management of advanced prostate cancer.

Personalized medicine for metastatic prostate cancer: The paradigm of PARP inhibitors

Despite remarkable progress in the last decade, metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa) remains incurable. The approval of PARP inhibitors (PARPis) represents a milestone in this field, which definitively enters the era of precision medicine, as mPCa is often enriched for defects of homologous recombination repair genes. PARPis are now used as single agents for patients with metastatic castration-resistant PCa. Moreover, combinations of PARPis plus androgen-receptor targeted agents and immune checkpoint inhibitors, and earlier applications of PARPis in the metastatic hormone-sensitive PCa are under evaluation, representing the possible upcoming applications of these agents. Mechanisms of sensitization and resistance have been only partially elucidated. In our review, we summarize the current clinical evidence regarding PARPis in mPCa and the future directions of these targeted agents.

Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors for patients with prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Immunotherapy has revolutionized the treatment paradigm of many cancers, however, its effectiveness in prostate cancer patients is still under question. In the present systematic review and meta-analysis, we sought for assessing the efficacy and safety of Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in patients with prostate cancer. PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and EMBASE databases were searched on Aguste 19, 2022. Thirty five studies met the eligibility criteria. The median overall survival (mOS) of all treatments was 14.1 months, with the longest and shortest mOS was seen among patients who received anti-CTLA-4 monotherapy and anti-PD-1/PD-L1+anti-CTLA-4 regimen at 24.9 and 9.2 months, respectively. Noteworthy, all types of adverse events had the lowest incidence in the anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy group. Considering the ICI monotherapy regimens, we found that fatigue, diarrhea, and infusion reaction had the highest incidence rates. Future studies evaluating the efficacy and safety of novel combination therapies with ICIs are warranted.

Hematological Toxicities with PARP Inhibitors in Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Phase II/III Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND

Poly ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitors (PARPis) are an important class of therapeutics for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Unlike hormone-based treatments for mCRPC, PARPis are not without drug-related hematological adverse events.

OBJECTIVE

To review the evidence on hematological toxicities, including anemia, thrombocytopenia, and neutropenia from PARPis in prostate cancer.

STUDY METHODOLOGY

A systematic review and meta-analysis using the PRISMA guidelines was performed for phase II and III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of PARPis in prostate cancer. PubMed, Embase, and Ovid All EBM reviews-Cochrane were queried from inception to 9 June 2023. The Mantel-Haenszel method was used to report risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for all-grade and high-grade anemia, thrombocytopenia, and neutropenia toxicities.

RESULTS

The systematic review retrieved eight phase II and III RCTs; specifically, eight were included in the anemia, five in the all-grade thrombocytopenia and neutropenia, and four in the high-grade thrombocytopenia and neutropenia outcomes. Compared to a placebo and/or other non-PARPi treatments, PARPi use was associated with an increased risk of all-grade anemia (RR, 3.37; 95% CI, 2.37-4.79; p < 0.00001), thrombocytopenia (RR, 4.54; 95% CI, 1.97-10.44; p = 0.0004), and neutropenia (RR, 3.11; 95% CI, 1.60-6.03; p = 0.0008). High-grade anemia (RR, 6.94; 95% CI, 4.06-11.86; p < 0.00001) and thrombocytopenia (RR, 5.52; 95% CI, 2.80-10.88; p < 0.00001) were also associated with an increased risk, while high-grade neutropenia (RR, 3.63; 95% CI, 0.77-17.23; p = 0.10) showed no significant association. Subgroup stratification analyses showed differences in various all-grade and high-grade toxicities.

CONCLUSION

PARPis were associated with an increased risk of hematological AEs. Future studies with more pooled RCTs will enhance this understanding and continue to inform patient-physician shared decision-making. Future studies may also have a role in improving the current management strategies for these AEs.

A Holistic Approach to Hard-to-Treat Cancers: The Future of Immunotherapy for Glioblastoma, Triple Negative Breast Cancer, and Advanced Prostate Cancer

Immunotherapy represents an attractive avenue for cancer therapy due to its tumour specificity and relatively low frequency of adverse effects compared to other treatment modalities. Despite many advances being made in the field of cancer immunotherapy, very few immunotherapeutic treatments have been approved for difficult-to-treat solid tumours such as triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), and advanced prostate cancer (PCa). The anatomical location of some of these cancers may also make them more difficult to treat. Many trials focus solely on immunotherapy and have failed to consider or manipulate, prior to the immunotherapeutic intervention, important factors such as the microbiota, which itself is directly linked to lifestyle factors, diet, stress, social support, exercise, sleep, and oral hygiene. This review summarises the most recent treatments for hard-to-treat cancers whilst factoring in the less conventional interventions which could tilt the balance of treatment in favour of success for these malignancies.

The mechanism and clinical application of DNA damage repair inhibitors combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of urologic cancer

Urologic cancers such as kidney, bladder, prostate, and uroepithelial cancers have recently become a considerable global health burden, and the response to immunotherapy is limited due to immune escape and immune resistance. Therefore, it is crucial to find appropriate and effective combination therapies to improve the sensitivity of patients to immunotherapy. DNA damage repair inhibitors can enhance the immunogenicity of tumor cells by increasing tumor mutational burden and neoantigen expression, activating immune-related signaling pathways, regulating PD-L1 expression, and reversing the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment to activate the immune system and enhance the efficacy of immunotherapy. Based on promising experimental results from preclinical studies, many clinical trials combining DNA damage repair inhibitors (e.g., PARP inhibitors and ATR inhibitors) with immune checkpoint inhibitors (e.g., PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors) are underway in patients with urologic cancers. Results from several clinical trials have shown that the combination of DNA damage repair inhibitors with immune checkpoint inhibitors can improve objective rates, progression-free survival, and overall survival (OS) in patients with urologic tumors, especially in patients with defective DNA damage repair genes or a high mutational load. In this review, we present the results of preclinical and clinical trials of different DNA damage repair inhibitors in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors in urologic cancers and summarize the potential mechanism of action of the combination therapy. Finally, we also discuss the challenges of dose toxicity, biomarker selection, drug tolerance, drug interactions in the treatment of urologic tumors with this combination therapy and look into the future direction of this combination therapy.

Targeting P21-Activated Kinase-1 for Metastatic Prostate Cancer

Metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa) has limited therapeutic options and a high mortality rate. The p21-activated kinase (PAK) family of proteins is important in cell survival, proliferation, and motility in physiology, and pathologies such as infectious, inflammatory, vascular, and neurological diseases as well as cancers. Group-I PAKs (PAK1, PAK2, and PAK3) are involved in the regulation of actin dynamics and thus are integral for cell morphology, adhesion to the extracellular matrix, and cell motility. They also play prominent roles in cell survival and proliferation. These properties make group-I PAKs a potentially important target for cancer therapy. In contrast to normal prostate and prostatic epithelial cells, group-I PAKs are highly expressed in mPCA and PCa tissue. Importantly, the expression of group-I PAKs is proportional to the Gleason score of the patients. While several compounds have been identified that target group-I PAKs and these are active in cells and mice, and while some inhibitors have entered human trials, as of yet, none have been FDA-approved. Probable reasons for this lack of translation include issues related to selectivity, specificity, stability, and efficacy resulting in side effects and/or lack of efficacy. In the current review, we describe the pathophysiology and current treatment guidelines of PCa, present group-I PAKs as a potential druggable target to treat mPCa patients, and discuss the various ATP-competitive and allosteric inhibitors of PAKs. We also discuss the development and testing of a nanotechnology-based therapeutic formulation of group-I PAK inhibitors and its significant potential advantages as a novel, selective, stable, and efficacious mPCa therapeutic over other PCa therapeutics in the pipeline.

Advances in PARP Inhibitors for Prostate Cancer

Poly-adenosine diphosphate-ribose polymerase plays an essential role in cell function by regulating apoptosis, genomic stability and DNA repair. PARPi is a promising drug class that has gained significant traction in the last decade with good outcomes in different cancers. Several trials have sought to test its effectiveness in metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). We conducted a comprehensive literature review to evaluate the current role of PARPi in this setting. To this effect, we conducted queries in the PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases. We reviewed and compared all major contemporary publications on the topic. In particular, recent phase II and III studies have also demonstrated the benefits of olaparib, rucaparib, niraparib, talazoparib in CRPC. Drug effectiveness has been assessed through radiological progression or overall response. Given the notion of synthetic lethality and potential synergy with other oncological therapies, several trials are looking to integrate PARPi in combined therapies. There remains ongoing controversy on the need for genetic screening prior to treatment initiation as well as the optimal patient population, which would benefit most from PARPi. PARPi is an important asset in the oncological arsenal for mCRPC. New combinations with PARPi may improve outcomes in earlier phases of prostate cancer.

Prostate cancer and novel pharmacological treatment options-what's new for 2022?

INTRODUCTION

Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) plus Androgen Receptor Target Agents (ARTAs) or docetaxel are the actual standard of care in prostate cancer (PC). Several therapeutic options are available for pretreated patients: cabazitaxel, olaparib, and rucaparib for BRCA mutations, Radium-223 for selected patients with symptomatic bone metastasis, sipuleucel T, and 177 LuPSMA-617.

AREAS COVERED

This review the new potential therapeutic approaches and the most impacting recent published trials to provide an overview on the future management of PC.

EXPERT OPINION

Currently, there is a growing interest in the potential role of triplet therapies encompassing ADT, chemotherapy, and ARTAs. These strategies, explored in different settings, appeared to be particularly promising in metastatic hormone-sensitive PC. Recent trials investigating ARTAs plus poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase (PARPi) inhibitor provided helpful insights for patients with metastatic castration resistant disease, regardless of homologous recombination genes status. Otherwise, the publication of the complete data is awaited, and more evidence is required. In advanced settings, several combination approaches are under investigation, to date with contradictory results, such as immunotherapy plus PARPi or chemotherapy. The radionuclide ¹⁷⁷Lu-PSMA-617 proved successful outcomes in pretreated mCRPC patients. Additional studies will better clarify the appropriate candidates to each strategy and the correct treatments' sequence.

Progression in immunotherapy for advanced prostate cancer

Prostate cancer is one of the most common malignant cancers of the male genitourinary system and has high morbidity and mortality. Currently, treatment modalities for localized prostate cancer focus mainly on radical prostatectomy or radical radiation therapy. Some patients still experience disease recurrence or progression after these treatments, while others are already at an advanced stage or have metastases at the time of diagnosis. With the continuous development and progress of medicine in recent years, immunotherapy has become a revolutionary cancer treatment, and has achieved remarkable accomplishments in the treatment of hematologic malignancies. A variety of immunotherapies have also appeared in the field of advanced prostate cancer treatment, including therapeutic vaccines and immune checkpoint therapies. Despite the discrepancy between the results of some immunotherapy studies, immunotherapy for prostate cancer has shown some initial success, especially in combination immunotherapies. Currently, immunotherapy is mainly used in advanced prostate cancer, especially in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. However, with the development of more clinical trials of immunotherapy, more evidence will be provided supporting the rational application of immunotherapy in the future.

Combining PARP Inhibition and Immunotherapy in BRCA-Associated Cancers

Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors have significantly improved treatment outcomes of homologous recombination (HR) repair-deficient cancers. While the activity of these agents is largely linked to multiple mechanisms underlying the synthetic lethality of PARP inhibition and HR deficiency, emerging data suggest that their efficacy is also tied to their effects on the immune microenvironment and dependent upon cytotoxic T-cell activation. Effects observed in preclinical models are currently being validated in on-treatment biopsy samples procured from patients enrolled in clinical trials. Although this work has stimulated the development of combinations of PARP inhibitors with immunomodulatory agents, results to date have not demonstrated the superiority of combined PARP inhibition and immune checkpoint blockade compared with PARP inhibition alone. These results have stimulated a more comprehensive assessment of the immunosuppressive components of the tumor microenvironment that must be addressed so that the efficacy of PARP inhibitor agents can be maximized.