Uniparental and functional X disomy in Turner syndrome patients with unexplained mental retardation and X derived marker chromosomes

Uniparental disomy as a mechanism for X-linked chondrodysplasia punctata

We describe a female infant with X-linked chondrodysplasia punctata (CDPX1) as a result of maternal isodisomy of the X chromosome. Targeted Sanger sequencing and targeted next-generation sequencing of ARSL were used to test for the familial variant. This patient was homozygous for ARSL NM_000047.2: c.1227_1228delinsAT p.(Ser410Cys) familial variant, consistent with a diagnosis of CDPX1. Uniparental disomy is a type of chromosomal variation. Although not necessarily pathogenic, it can cause imprinting disorders and X-linked recessive disorders in females, and be a cause of autosomal recessive conditions when only one parent is a carrier. The patient described highlights that uniparental disomy can be a rare cause of X-linked recessive conditions. This mode of inheritance has not been previously described in this condition.

Uniparental disomy of the entire X chromosome in Turner syndrome patient-specific induced pluripotent stem cells

The human induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) technique promises to provide an unlimited, reliable source of genetically matched pluripotent cells for personalized therapy and disease modeling. Recently, it is observed that cells with ring chromosomes 13 or 17 autonomously correct the defects via compensatory uniparental disomy during cellular reprogramming to iPSCs. This breakthrough finding suggests a potential therapeutic approach to repair large-scale chromosomal aberrations. However, due to the scarceness of ring chromosome samples, the reproducibility of this approach in different individuals is not carefully evaluated yet. Moreover, the underlying mechanism and the applicability to other types of chromosomal aberrations remain unknown. Here we generated iPSCs from four 45,X chorionic villous fibroblast lines and found that only one reprogrammed line acquired 46,XX karyotype via uniparental disomy of the entire X chromosome. The karyotype correction was reproducible in the same cell line by either retroviral or episomal reprogramming. The karyotype-corrected iPSCs were subject to X chromosome inactivation and obtained better colony morphology and higher proliferation rate than other uncorrected ones. Further transcriptomic comparison among the fibroblast lines identified a distinct expression pattern of cell cycle regulators in the uncorrectable ones. These findings demonstrate that the iPSC technique holds the potential to correct X monosomy, but the correction rate is very low, probably due to differential regulation of cell cycle genes between individuals. Our data strongly suggest that more systematic investigations are needed before defining the iPSC technique as a novel means of chromosome therapy.

Phenotype and X inactivation in 45,X/46,X,r(X) cases

We studied a new series of 21 individuals mosaic for a ring X chromosome [r(X)]. Of nine individuals with mental retardation, only one had a r(X) that lacked XIST (X-inactive-specific transcript) and was not subject to X inactivation, which would explain the abnormal phenotype; the remaining eight cases had XIST on their r(X). The majority of cases (five of seven) with mental retardation had an apparently early replicating r(X); but the androgen receptor gene (AR) was methylated on one allele in five of six informative cases, including two cases with an early replicating r(X). These conflicting results on two indicators of X inactivation suggest a potential dissociation between late replication and DNA methylation in these r(X) chromosomes, which may fail to become completely silenced. Of the twelve subjects who were not mentally retarded, all had XIST present on their r(X) and most (8/10) showed a late replicating r(X), together with AR methylation in all five informative cases, indicating r(X) inactivation. Thus, the unusual phenotypic features and mental retardation associated with the presence of a r(X) cannot be explained solely on the basis of presence or absence of XIST. The r(X) in cases with mental retardation were consistently smaller than those in individuals with normal intelligence, perhaps indicating inability for small rings to undergo structural changes associated with complete X inactivation or lethality in cases with a large non-inactivated r(X). Of the Turner syndrome features present in the r(X) cases, only edema was present in a lesser frequency than in 45,X individuals. Our cases generally had a less severe phenotype than those previously reported, suggesting that reported incidences of abnormalities may be influenced by ascertainment bias, with mental retardation potentially unrelated to the presence of the r(X) in some cases.

Uniparental disomy (UPD) other than 15: Phenotypes and bibliography updated

Uniparental disomy (UPD) describes the inheritance of a pair of chromosomes from only one parent. The concept was introduced in Medical Genetics by Engel (1980); Am J Med Genet 6:137-143. Aside UPD 15, which is the most frequent one, up to now (February 2005) 197 cases with whole chromosome maternal UPD other than 15 (124 X heterodisomy, 59 X isodisomy, and 14 cases without information of the mode of UPD) and 68 cases with whole chromosome paternal UPD other than 15 (13 X heterdisomy, 53 X isodisomy, and 2 cases without information of the mode of UPD) have been reported. In this review we discuss briefly the problems associated with UPD and provide a comprehensive clinical summary with a bibliography for each UPD other than 15 as a guide for genetic counseling.

X chromosomal abnormalities in Indian adolescent girls

In girls of adolescent age, primary amenorrhea is a major problem and it is often suspected as Turner syndrome (TS), with complete or partial absence of one of the two X chromosomes. The girls who are unable to menstruate are primarily investigated by the gynecologists with the help of a physical examination, sonogram of the pelvis, endocrinologic tests, and ultimately cytogenetic analysis. Chromosomal analyses have been carried out in 280 such cases that were referred from different parts of the country. The standard protocol for peripheral blood lymphocyte culture was followed for metaphase chromosome preparation and conventional analysis of G-banded chromosomes. A total of 29% cases were found to have some chromosomal abnormality, including TS and testicular feminization syndrome involving sex chromosomes. Amongst those with sex chromosomal anomaly, 34% had evidence of a 46,XY karyotype in phenotypic females and 51% had pure line 45,X or mosaic with normal XX or other aberrations in X. The classification of the TS group further showed the spectrum of variant TS in Indian adolescent girls who suffered from absence or delayed menarche to correspond well with the Belgian, Danish, or Russian population. However, it has been reported that only 1% of the pure line 45,X conception is viable, indicating the necessity of mosaicism with X or Y chromosome. It has been understood that conventional banding analysis is absolutely necessary for segregating the variant nature of TS. In addition, molecular genetic or molecular cytogenetic investigations can determine the nature of mosaicism. The present study further indicated the involvement of autosomes in causing improper sexual development in girls of adolescent age.

Microsatellite analysis in Turner syndrome: parental origin of X chromosomes and possible mechanism of formation of abnormal chromosomes

Turner syndrome is a chromosomal disorder in which all or part of one X chromosome is missing. The meiotic or mitotic origin of most cases remains unknown due to the difficulty in detecting hidden mosaicism and to the lack of meiotic segregation studies. We analyzed 15 Turner patients, 10 with a 45,X whereas the rest had a second cell line with abnormal X-chromosomes: a pseudodicentric, an isochromosome, one large and one small ring, and the last with a long arm deletion. Our aims were: to detect X cryptic mosaicism in patients with a 45,X constitution; to determine the parental origin of the abnormality; to infer the zygotic origin of the karyotype and to suggest the timing and mechanism of the error(s) leading to the formation of abnormal X chromosomes from maternal origin. Molecular investigation did not revealed heterozygosity for any microsatellite, excluding X mosaicism in the 45,X cases. Parental origin of the single X chromosome was maternal in 90% of these patients. Three of the structurally abnormal Xs were maternally derived whereas the other two were paternal. These results allowed us to corroborate breakpoints in these abnormal X chromosomes and suggest that the pseudodicentric chromosome originated from post-zygotic sister chromatid exchange, whereas the Xq deleted chromosome probably arose after a recombination event during maternal meiosis.

Lack of expression of XIST from a small ring X chromosome containing the XIST locus in a girl with short stature, facial dysmorphism and developmental delay

A 46,X,r(X) karyotype was found in a three and a half year old girl with short stature, facial dysmorphism and developmental delay. The clinical findings were consistent with the phenotype described in a limited number of patients with small ring X chromosomes lacking the XIST locus, a critical player in the process of X chromosome inactivation. Surprisingly, in our patient, fluorescent in situ hybridisation demonstrated that the XIST locus was present on the ring X. However, expression studies showed that there was no XIST transcript in peripheral blood cells, suggesting that the ring X had not been inactivated. This was confirmed by the demonstration that both of the patient's alleles for the androgen receptor gene were unmethylated, and that both of the patient's ZXDA alleles were expressed. The active nature of the ring X would presumably result in overexpression of genes that may account for the developmental delay observed for the patient. Using polymorphic markers along the X chromosome, the ring X was determined to be of paternal origin with one breakpoint in the long arm between DXS8037 and XIST and one in the short arm in Xp11.2 between DXS1126 and DXS991. To attempt to determine why the XIST gene failed to be expressed, the promoter region was sequenced and found to have a base change at the same location as a variant previously associated with nonrandom X chromosome inactivation. This mutation was not seen in over one hundred normal X chromosomes examined; however, it was observed in the paternal grandmother who did not show substantial skewing of X chromosome inactivation.

PCR-PRINS-FISH analysis of structurally abnormal sex chromosomes in eight patients with Turner phenotype

According to cytogenetic analysis, about 50% of Turner individuals are 45,X. The remaining cases have a structurally abnormal X chromosome or are mosaics with a second cell line containing a normal or abnormal sex chromosome. In these mosaics, approximately 20% have a sex marker chromosome whose identity cannot usually be determined by classical cytogenetic methods, requiring the use of molecular techniques. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR), primed in situ labeling (PRINS), and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analyses were performed in 8 patients with Turner syndrome and 45,X mosaic karyotypes to determine the origin and structure of the marker chromosome in the second cell line. Our data showed that markers were Y-derived in 2 patients and X-derived in the remaining 6 patients. We were also able to determine the breakpoints in the two Y chromosomes. The use of cytogenetic and molecular techniques allowed us to establish unequivocally the origin, X or Y, of the marker chromosomes in the 8 patients with Turner phenotype. This study illustrates the power of resolution and utility of combined cytogenetic and molecular approaches in some clinical cases.

Complex and segmental uniparental disomy (UPD): review and lessons from rare chromosomal complements

OBJECTIVE

To review all cases with segmental and/or complex uniparental disomy (UPD), to study aetiology and mechanisms of formation, and to draw conclusions.

DESIGN

Searching published reports in Medline.

RESULTS

The survey found at least nine cases with segmental UPD and a normal karyotype, 22 cases with UPD of a whole chromosome and a simple or a non-homologous Robertsonian translocation, eight cases with UPD and two isochromosomes, one of the short arm and one of the long arm of a non-acrocentric chromosome, 39 cases with UPD and an isochromosome of the long arm of two homologous acrocentric chromosomes, one case of UPD and an isochromosome 8 associated with a homozygous del(8)(p23.3pter), and 21 cases with UPD of a whole or parts of a chromosome associated with a complex karyotype. Segmental UPD is formed by somatic recombination (isodisomy) or by trisomy rescue. In the latter mechanism, a meiosis I error is associated with meiotic recombination and an additional somatic exchange between two non-uniparental chromatids. Subsequently, the chromatid that originated from the disomic gamete is lost (iso- and heterodisomy). In cases of UPD associated with one isochromosome of the short arm and one isochromosome of the long arm of a non-acrocentric chromosome and in cases of UPD associated with a true isochromosome of an acrocentric chromosome, mitotic complementation is assumed. This term describes the formation by misdivision at the centromere during an early mitosis of a monosomic zygote. In cases of UPD associated with an additional marker chromosome, either mitotic formation of the marker chromosome in a trisomic zygote or fertilisation of a gamete with a marker chromosome formed in meiosis by a disomic gamete or by a normal gamete and subsequent duplication are possible.

CONCLUSIONS

Research in the field of segmental and/or complex UPD may help to explain undiagnosed non-Mendelian disorders, to recognise hotspots for meiotic and mitotic recombinations, and to show that chromosomal segregation is more complex than previously thought. It may also be helpful to map autosomal recessively inherited genes, genes/regions of genomic imprinting, and dysmorphic phenotypes. Last but not least it would improve genetic counselling.

The causes and consequences of random and non-random X chromosome inactivation in humans

X chromosome (X) inactivation is a remarkable biological process including the choice and cis-limited inactivation of one X, as well as the stable maintenance of this silencing by epigenetic chromatin alterations. The process results in females generally being mosaic for two populations of cells--one with each parental X active. In this review, we discuss recent advances in our understanding of how inactivation works, as well as the causes and clinical implications of deviations from random inactivation.