Use of human intravenous immunoglobulin in lower motor neuron syndromes

Neuromuscular ultrasound in combination with nerve conduction studies helps identify inflammatory motor neuropathies from lower motor neuron syndromes

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Identifying patients with inflammatory motor neuropathies (IMNs) is warranted since effective treatments are available and the prognosis of these patients differs from that of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients.

METHODS

Between January 2019 and May 2022, 102 consecutive treatment-naïve lower motor neuron syndrome (LMNS) patients were recruited; these patients were suspected of having multifocal motor neuropathy, pure motor chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis with initial lower motor neuron presentation. Neuromuscular ultrasound (US) and nerve conduction studies (NCSs) were conducted at baseline. Relevant diagnostic investigations were performed if clinically warranted. The proposed US evidence of IMN was as follows: (i) nerve enlargement at ≥1 of the predetermined sites or (ii) absence of high intensity fasciculations in predefined muscle groups. Final diagnoses were made by experienced physicians after a prolonged follow-up period (≥12 months). IMN patients were defined as LMNS patients who experienced convincing improvements in response to immunotherapies. IMN patients without electrodiagnostic demyelinating features were diagnosed with treatment-responsive LMNS (TR-LMNS).

RESULTS

In total, 16 patients were classified as IMN, including nine chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy/multifocal motor neuropathy patients and seven TR-LMNS patients. Six TR-LMNS patients were identified by neuromuscular US. The sensitivity and specificity of NCSs, nerve US and muscle US were 56.3% and 100%, 43.8% and 90.7% and 68.8% and 97.7%, respectively. When these three modalities were combined, the sensitivity and specificity were 93.8% and 88.4%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Neuromuscular US studies are supplementary modalities to NCSs, and the combined use of these techniques might improve the identification of IMNs in LMNS patients.

Progressive Muscular Atrophy

Progressive muscular atrophy (PMA) is a rare, sporadic, adult-onset motor neuron disease, clinically characterized by isolated lower motor neuron features; however, clinically evident upper motor neuron signs may emerge in some patients. Subclinical upper motor neuron involvement is identified pathologically, radiologically, and neurophysiologically in a substantial number of patients with PMA. Patients with subclinical upper motor neuron involvement do not fulfill the revised El Escorial criteria to participate in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis clinical trials. Intravenous immunoglobulin therapy is only marginally beneficial in a small subgroup of patients with lower motor neuron syndrome without conduction block.

Is IVIg therapy warranted in progressive lower motor neuron syndromes without conduction block?

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the likelihood of response to IV immunoglobulin (IVIg) by studying consecutive patients presenting with progressive, asymmetric, pure lower motor neuron (LMN) limb weakness, and to determine the clinical phenotype of those who respond.

METHODS

Thirty-one consecutive patients with progressive, focal-onset LMN limb weakness, without evidence of clinical upper motor neuron signs; sensory, respiratory, or bulbar involvement; or evidence of motor nerve conduction block on electrodiagnostic studies, were prospectively included in this study. Each patient underwent treatment with IVIg (2 g/kg) for a minimum of 3 months. Electrodiagnostic studies, a neuromuscular symptom score, and expanded Medical Research Council sum score were documented before and after IVIg treatment. The final diagnosis was determined after prolonged clinical follow-up.

RESULTS

Only 3 of 31 patients (10%) responded to IVIg. All responders demonstrated distal upper limb-onset weakness, EMG abnormalities confined to the clinically weak muscles, and a normal creatine kinase. This set of features was also identified in 31% of nonresponders presenting with distal upper limb weakness. Sex, age at onset, number of involved limb regions, and the duration of symptoms before treatment were not significantly different between groups.

CONCLUSION

The findings of the present study do not support uniform use of IVIg in patients presenting with progressive asymmetric LMN limb weakness. It is suggested that IVIg treatment be limited to patients who demonstrate clinical and laboratory features suggestive of multifocal motor neuropathy.

CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE

This study provides Class IV evidence that IVIg will not improve muscle function in 90% of patients with progressive, asymmetric, pure LMN weakness.

Multifocal motor neuropathy, multifocal acquired demyelinating sensory and motor neuropathy, and other chronic acquired demyelinating polyneuropathy variants

Chronic acquired demyelinating neuropathies (CADP) constitute an important group of immune neuromuscular disorders affecting myelin. This article discusses CADP with emphasis on multifocal motor neuropathy, multifocal acquired demyelinating sensory and motor neuropathy, distal acquired demyelinating symmetric neuropathy, and less common variants. Although each of these entities has distinctive laboratory and electrodiagnostic features that aid in their diagnosis, clinical characteristics are of paramount importance in diagnosing specific conditions and determining the most appropriate therapies. Knowledge regarding pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management of these disorders continues to expand, resulting in improved opportunities for identification and treatment.

Multifocal acquired sensory and motor neuropathy: electrodiagnostic features

The electrodiagnostic studies of 13 consecutive patients with multifocal sensory and motor neuropathy of unknown etiology were reviewed to determine whether they exhibit features of demyelination or axonal degeneration. The type and frequency of demyelinating features, fulfillment of electrodiagnostic criteria for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP), and response to immunotherapy were noted. Of 13 patients, 11 had at least one electrodiagnostic feature of demyelination at presentation and 2 had none. Seventeen percent to 77% of the patients fulfilled at least one of the published electrodiagnostic CIDP criteria, depending on the criteria used, but the number of demyelinating features per patient was less than reported for unselected patients with CIDP. Patients with multifocal sensory and motor neuropathy had a similar percentage of nerves with partial conduction block or F-wave prolongation as reported for unselected CIDP, but a smaller percentage of nerves exhibiting prolonged distal compound muscle action potential duration, distal latency prolongation or slowed conduction velocities. All treated patients, including 2 who did not meet any CIDP criteria, had at least a moderate response to immunotherapy. The results indicate that a large majority of, but not all, patients with idiopathic multifocal sensory and motor neuropathies exhibit electrodiagnostic features of demyelination, although fewer than seen in classic CIDP.

Do A-waves help predict intravenous immunoglobulin response in multifocal motor neuropathy without block?

INTRODUCTION

Are there electrophysiological findings that predict response to intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) in patients with lower motor neuron (LMN) syndromes without multifocal conduction block (MCB)?

METHODS

We enrolled 9 patients with LMN syndromes without MCB to receive 18 weeks of IVIg therapy. Response was measured at weeks 2 and 18 using the Appel Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (AALS) score (includes grip and pincer strength measures), ALS Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS), and electrophysiological measures, including motor unit estimates (MUNEs).

RESULTS

No change occurred in AALS or ALSFRS scores posttreatment. Grip/pincer strength increased in 7 patients (P = 0.028) after initial treatment (responders); 2 showed no improvement (non-responders). No electrophysiological measure changed after treatment in either group but MUNEs trended higher (P = 0.055). "Abnormal A-waves" (complex, repetitive biphasic, or present in multiple nerves) occurred in pretreatment studies more often in responders (P = 0.028).

DISCUSSION

"Abnormal A-waves" may signal IVIg-responsive LMN syndromes even if conduction block is absent.

[The significance of intravenous immunoglobulin in treatment of immune-mediated polyneuropathies]

Long-term treatment of immune-mediated polyneuropathies remains difficult. For acute polyneuritis, or Guillain-Barré syndrome, the established standard therapy utilizes high doses of polyvalent intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG). A recently published randomized placebo-controlled study of patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) showed IVIG to be clinically effective also for this disorder in both short and long term. This survey presents data of this so-called ICE study ("Intravenous immune globulin for the treatment of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy"). It also discusses the value of IVIG in the treatment of immune-mediated polyneuropathies.

Intravenous immunoglobulins in the treatment of immune neuropathies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of this review is to describe the value of high-dose polyclonal intravenous immunoglobulins as a treatment option in autoimmune disorders affecting the peripheral nervous system.

RECENT FINDINGS

A randomized placebo-controlled trial in patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy revealed short-term and long-term efficacy and safety of intravenous immunoglobulins as a treatment option for the chronically inflamed peripheral nervous system. Case reports suggest that the subcutaneous administration of immunoglobulins may represent a convenient alternative.

SUMMARY

Intravenous immunoglobulin represents an effective and safe treatment option in patients with autoimmune-mediated diseases affecting the peripheral nerves.

European Federation of Neurological Societies/Peripheral Nerve Society guideline on management of multifocal motor neuropathy

Several diagnostic criteria for multifocal motor neuropathy have been proposed in recent years and a beneficial effect of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) and various other immunomodulatory drugs has been suggested in several trials and uncontrolled studies. The objectives were to prepare consensus guidelines on the definition, investigation and treatment of multifocal motor neuropathy. Disease experts and a patient representative considered references retrieved from MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library in July 2004 and prepared statements which were agreed in an iterative fashion. The Task Force agreed good practice points to define clinical and electrophysiological diagnostic criteria for multifocal motor neuropathy and investigations to be considered. The principal recommendations and good practice points were: (i) IVIg (2 g/kg given over 2-5 days) should be considered as the first line treatment (level A recommendation) when disability is sufficiently severe to warrant treatment. (ii) Corticosteroids are not recommended (good practice point). (iii) If initial treatment with IVIg is effective, repeated IVIg treatment should be considered (level C recommendation). The frequency of IVIg maintenance therapy should be guided by the individual response (good practice point). Typical treatment regimens are 1 g/kg every 2-4 weeks or 2 g/kg every 4-8 weeks (good practice point). (iv) If IVIg is not or not sufficiently effective then immunosuppressive treatment may be considered. Cyclophosphamide, ciclosporin, azathioprine, interferon beta1a, or rituximab are possible agents (good practice point). (v) Toxicity makes cyclophosphamide a less desirable option (good practice point).

Axon loss is an important determinant of weakness in multifocal motor neuropathy

BACKGROUND

Multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) is characterised by asymmetrical weakness and muscle atrophy, in the arms more than the legs, without sensory loss. Despite a beneficial response to treatment with intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg), weakness is slowly progressive. Histopathological studies in MMN revealed features of demyelination and axon loss. It is unknown to what extent demyelination and axon loss contribute to weakness. Unlike demyelination, axon loss has not been studied systematically in MMN. Aims/

METHODS

To assess the independent determinants of weakness in MMN, 20 patients with MMN on IVIg treatment were investigated. Using a standardised examination in each patient, muscle strength was determined in 10 muscles. In the innervating nerve of each muscle, axon loss was assessed by concentric needle electromyography, and conduction block or demyelinative slowing by motor nerve conduction studies. Multivariate analysis was used to assess independent determinants of weakness.

RESULTS

Needle electromyography abnormalities compatible with axon loss were found in 61% of all muscles. Axon loss, and not conduction block or demyelinative slowing, was the most significant independent determinant of weakness in corresponding muscles. Furthermore, axon loss and conduction block were independently associated with each other.

CONCLUSION

Axon loss occurs frequently in MMN and pathogenic mechanisms leading to axonal degeneration may play an important role in the outcome of the neurological deficit in patients with MMN. Therapeutic strategies aimed at prevention and reduction of axon loss, such as early initiation of treatment or additional (neuroprotective) agents, should be considered in the treatment of patients with MMN.

European Federation of Neurological Societies/Peripheral Nerve Society Guideline on management of multifocal motor neuropathy. Report of a joint task force of the European Federation of Neurological Societies and the Peripheral Nerve Society

BACKGROUND

Several diagnostic criteria for multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) have been proposed in recent years, and a beneficial effect of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) and various other immunomodulatory drugs has been suggested in several trials and uncontrolled studies.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this guideline was to prepare consensus guidelines on the definition, investigation, and treatment of MMN.

METHODS

Disease experts and a representative of patients considered references retrieved from MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library in July 2004 and prepared statements that were agreed in an iterative fashion.

RECOMMENDATIONS

The Task Force agreed on good practice points to define clinical and electrophysiological diagnostic criteria for MMN and investigations to be considered. The principal recommendations and good practice points were as follows: (1) IVIg (2 g/kg given over 2-5 days) should be considered as the first line of treatment (level A recommendation) when disability is sufficiently severe to warrant treatment; (2) corticosteroids are not recommended (good practice point); (3) if initial treatment with IVIg is effective, repeated IVIg treatment should be considered (level C recommendation). The frequency of IVIg maintenance therapy should be guided by the individual response (good practice point). Typical treatment regimens are 1 g/kg every 2-4 weeks or 2 g/kg every 4-8 weeks (good practice point); (4) if IVIg is not (or not sufficiently) effective, then immunosuppressive treatment may be considered. Cyclophosphamide, cyclosporine, azathioprine, interferon-beta1a, or rituximab are possible agents (good practice point); and (5) toxicity makes cyclophosphamide a less desirable option (good practice point).

Prediction of response to IVIg treatment in patients with lower motor neurone disorders

The distinction between multifocal motor neuropathy, treatable by intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg), and degenerative motor neurone disorders is often difficult. To find predictive factors for the response to IVIg treatment, 40 consecutive patients with pure lower motor neurone disorders (LMND) were prospectively examined. They all received at least two times IVIg (2 g/kg bodyweight). Prior to the first and before all the following treatments a standardized evaluation was performed including clinical examination, neurophysiological and laboratory evaluation. According to changes in the neurological examination and the Neuromuscular Symptom Score, the patients were divided into responders and non-responders after the second course of treatment. In our study, no single clinical, neurophysiological, or laboratory parameter was sensitive enough to predict response. The only single parameter that highly correlated with a positive response to treatment was an elevated GM1 antibody titre. Lack of response to IVIg treatment is likely in patients with generalization of electromyographic signs of denervation beyond the clinically involved site, proximal localization of the weakness, and an elevated level of the creatinekinase. Conduction blocks do not distinguish between both groups. We propose a scoring system combining clinical, serological and neurophysiological data in order to decide which patients with LMND may receive IVIg.

Multifocal motor neuropathy: current concepts and controversies

Multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) is now a well-defined purely motor multineuropathy characterized by the presence of multifocal partial motor conduction blocks (CB), frequent association with anti-GM1 IgM antibodies, and usually a good response to high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) therapy. However, several issues remain to be clarified in the diagnosis, pathogenesis, and therapy of this condition including its nosological position and its relation to other chronic dysimmune neuropathies; the degree of CB necessary for the diagnosis of MMN; the existence of an axonal form of MMN; the pathophysiological basis of CB; the pathogenetic role of antiganglioside antibodies; the mechanism of action of IVIg treatments in MMN and the most effective regimen; and the treatment to be used in unresponsive patients. These issues are addressed in this review of the main clinical, electrophysiological, immunological, and therapeutic features of this neuropathy.

Multifocal motor neuropathy

Multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) is an immune-mediated disorder characterised by slowly progressive, asymmetrical weakness of limbs without sensory loss. The clinical presentation of MMN mimics that of lower-motor-neuron disease, but in nerve-conduction studies of patients with MMN motor-conduction block has been found. By contrast with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy, treatment with prednisolone and plasma exchange is generally ineffective in MMN and even associated with clinical worsening in some patients. Of the immunosuppressants, cyclophosphamide has been reported as effective but only anecdotally. Various open trials and four placebo-controlled trials have shown that treatment with high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin leads to improvement of muscle strength in patients with MMN. Although clinical, pathological, imaging, immunological, and electrophysiological studies have improved our understanding of MMN over the past 15 years, further research is needed to elucidate pathogenetic disease mechanisms in the disorder.

Intravenous immunoglobulin for multifocal motor neuropathy

BACKGROUND

Multifocal motor neuropathy is a rare, probably immune mediated disorder characterised by slowly progressive, asymmetric, distal weakness of one or more limbs with no objective loss of sensation. It may cause prolonged periods of disability. The treatment options for multifocal motor neuropathy are sparse. Patients with multifocal motor neuropathy do not usually respond to steroids or plasma exchange, and may even worsen with these treatments. Many uncontrolled studies have suggested a beneficial effect of intravenous immunoglobulin.

OBJECTIVES

To review systematically the evidence from randomised controlled trials concerning the efficacy and safety of intravenous immunoglobulin in multifocal motor neuropathy.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We used the search strategy of the Cochrane Neuromuscular Disease Review Group to search the Disease Group register (searched September 2003), MEDLINE (January 1990 to September 2003), EMBASE (January 1990 to September 2003) and ISI (January 1990 to September 2003) databases for randomised controlled trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled studies examining the effects of any dose of intravenous immunoglobulin versus placebo in patients with definite or probable multifocal motor neuropathy. Outcome measures had to include one of the following: disability, strength, or conduction block. Studies which reported the frequency of adverse effects were used to assess safety.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors reviewed literature searches to identify potentially relevant trials, scored their quality and extracted data independently. For dichotomous data, we calculated relative risks, and for continuous data, effect sizes and weighted pooled effect sizes. Statistical uncertainty was expressed with 95% confidence intervals.

MAIN RESULTS

Four randomised controlled trials including a total of 34 patients were suitable for this systematic review. Strength improved in 78% of patients treated with intravenous immunoglobulin and only 4% of placebo-treated patients. Disability improved in 39% of patients after intravenous immunoglobulin treatment and in 11% after placebo (statistically not significantly different). Mild, transient side effects were reported in 71% of intravenous immunoglobulin treated patients. Serious side effects were not encountered.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Limited evidence from randomised controlled trials shows that intravenous immunoglobulin has a beneficial effect on strength. There was a non-significant trend towards improvement in disability. More research is needed to discover whether intravenous immunoglobulin improves disability and is cost-effective.

Magnetic stimulation using a triple-stimulation technique in patients with multifocal neuropathy without conduction block

It has been suggested previously that multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) without conduction block (CB) or other features of demyelination is axonal in nature. Conventional transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and the triple-stimulation technique (TST) performed on 10 MMN patients without CB revealed a proximal focal CB in 4 patients. In 3 other patients, the amplitude ratio obtained in response to conventional TMS was abnormally low, but the area ratio was normal. The TST amplitude ratio and area ratio were normal in these 3 patients. This pattern suggested the occurrence of temporal dispersion without CB. The occurrence of temporal dispersion or CB was associated with a relatively satisfactory response to intravenous immunoglobulins. These findings suggest that some forms of MMN previously thought to be axonal are in fact proximal variants of MMN with CB.

On the early diagnosis of IVIg-responsive chronic multifocal acquired motor axonopathy

Multifocal acquired motor axonopathy (MAMA) is a treatable, immune mediated motor neuropathy with purely axonal electrophysiological features. Distinction from degenerative neuronopathies such as progressive muscular atrophy (PMA) or early motor neuron disease (MND) can be difficult because of the similar clinical and electrophysiological findings. Here, we report the clinical, electrophysiological and laboratory findings in 6 patients with MAMA. Electrophysiological testing showed purely axonal findings with evidence of pathological spontaneous activity and chronic neurogenic changes. Of particular note, pathological spontaneous activity in paraspinal myotoms was not detectable in any of the patients even though it had been documented in peripheral muscles of the corresponding myotome(s). Elevated serum ganglioside antibody levels,most frequently anti-GD1a antibodies, were present in all 6 patients. IV Ig treatment led to clinical improvement in all but one patient, who showed an allergic response when exposed to IVIg. Our findings indicate that paraspinal EMG and anti-GD1a antibodies can facilitate the early identification of treatable, IVIg responsive, patients with MAMA.

Advances in understanding and treatment of immune-mediated disorders of the peripheral nervous system

During recent years, novel insights in basic immunology and advances in biotechnology have contributed to an increased understanding of the pathogenetic mechanisms of immune-mediated disorders of the peripheral nervous system. This increased knowledge has an impact on the management of patients with this class of disorders. Current advances are outlined and their implication for therapeutic approaches addressed. As a prototypic immune-mediated neuropathy, special emphasis is placed on the pathogenesis and treatment of the Guillain-Barré syndrome and its variants. Moreover, neuropathies of the chronic inflammatory demyelinating, multifocal motor, and nonsystemic vasculitic types are discussed. This review summarizes recent progress with currently available therapies and--on the basis of present immunopathogenetic concepts--outlines future treatment strategies.

Demyelination and axonal loss in multifocal motor neuropathy: distribution and relation to weakness

Multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) is characterized by a slowly progressive, asymmetric weakness of the limbs without sensory loss. The arms are usually affected to a greater extent than the legs, and distal muscles more than proximal muscles. The distribution of electrophysiological abnormalities and its correlation with weak muscle groups in MMN have not been investigated systematically. The aim of the present study was to assess whether electrophysiological abnormalities have a preferential or random distribution, whether electrophysiological abnormalities in a nerve correlate with weakness in the innervated muscles, and whether these results are relevant for the development of optimal electrodiagnostic protocols. We compared the pattern of weakness and electrophysiological abnormalities in 39 patients with a lower motoneuron syndrome and a positive response to intravenous immunoglobulins. All patients underwent an extensive standardized electrophysiological examination. Electrophysiological evidence of demyelination was found more often in the nerves of the arms and was distributed randomly over lower arm, upper arm and shoulder segments. Electrophysiological evidence of axonal loss presented more frequently in longer nerves, occurring most often in the leg nerves. For the arm nerves, it is possible that the length dependence of axonal loss is due to the random distribution of demyelinating lesions that lead to axonal degeneration. Weakness was associated with features of demyelination and axonal loss in the nerves of the arm, and with features of axonal loss in leg nerves. However, a substantial number (approximately one-third) of electrophysiological abnormalities were found in nerves innervating non-weakened muscles. These results imply that in MMN, conduction block is most likely to be found in long arm nerves innervating weakened muscles, but if conduction block cannot be detected in these nerves, the electrophysiological examination should be extended to other arm nerves including those innervating non-weakened muscles.

Management of motor neurone disease

Motor neurone disease is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder leading to severe disability and death. It is clinically characterised by mixed upper and lower motor neurone involvement affecting bulbar, limb, and respiratory musculature. Recent guidelines have established diagnostic criteria and defined management of the condition. In a proportion of familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis there is a mutation in the gene encoding the enzyme copper/zinc superoxide dismutase 1; this has allowed mutation screening and generated considerable laboratory based research. The diagnosis must be given with care and consideration and close follow up is essential. Management involves a multidisciplinary team based in the hospital and the community. Riluzole is the only drug shown to have a disease modifying effect and has been approved by the National Institute for Clinical Excellence. The essence of care is good symptomatic management, including nutritional support with percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and ventilatory care with non-invasive ventilation. Palliative care should be introduced before the terminal stages after careful discussion with the patient and carers. Knowledge of this condition has grown dramatically recently with a parallel improvement in treatment and ability to deal with the most troublesome problems.

Intravenous immunoglobulin in neurological disease: a specialist review

Treatment of neurological disorders with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) is an increasing feature of our practice for an expanding range of indications. For some there is evidence of benefit from randomised controlled trials, whereas for others evidence is anecdotal. The relative rarity of some of the disorders means that good randomised control trials will be difficult to deliver. Meanwhile, the treatment is costly and pressure to "do something" in often distressing disorders considerable. This review follows a 1 day meeting of the authors in November 2000 and examines current evidence for the use of IVIg in neurological conditions and comments on mechanisms of action, delivery, safety and tolerability, and health economic issues. Evidence of efficacy has been classified into levels for healthcare interventions (tables 1 and 2).

Multifocal motor neuropathy

Multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) is a recently identified peripheral nerve disorder characterized by progressive, predominantly distal, asymmetric limb weakness mostly affecting upper limbs, minimal or no sensory impairment, and by the presence on nerve conduction studies of multifocal persistent partial conduction blocks on motor but not sensory nerves. The etiopathogenesis of MMN is not known, but there is some evidence, based mostly on the clinical improvement after immunological therapies, that the disease has an immunological basis. Antibodies, mostly IgM, to the gangliosides GM1, and though less frequently, GM2 and GD1a, are frequently detected in patients' sera, helping in the diagnosis of this disease. Even if there is some experimental evidence that these antibodies may be pathogenic in vitro, their role in the neuropathy remains to be established. Patients with MMN do not usually respond to steroids or plasma exchange, which may occasionally worsen the symptoms, while the efficacy of cyclophosphamide is limited by its relevant side effects. More than 80% of MMN patients rapidly improve with high dose intravenous immunoglobulin therapy (IVIg). The effect of this therapy is, however, transient and improvement has to be maintained with periodic infusions. A positive response to interferon-beta has been recently reported in a minority of patients, some of whom were resistant to IVIg. Even if many progresses have been made on the diagnosis and therapy of MMN, there are still several issues on the nosological position, etiopathogenesis and long-term treatment of this neuropathy that need to be clarified.

Asymmetric Acquired Demyelinating Polyneuropathies: MMN and MADSAM

More than a half a century after Austin's initial description of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP), the clinical spectrum of chronic acquired demyelinating polyneuropathies has expanded. Currently there are a number of entities that can be put under the heading of chronic acquired demyelinating neuropathy (CADP) based on differing clinical presentations. In this scheme, CIDP is used only to refer to patients with demyelinating neuropathies and generalized symmetric weakness. In contrast, multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) and multifocal acquired demyelinating sensory and motor neuropathy (MADSAM) fall into the category of asymmetrical, multifocal forms of CADP. These are distinguished from each other only by the presence of sensory involvement. In our opinion, there are pragmatic reasons for splitting these clinical presentations into distinct entities. Although each of these clinical subtypes shares some basic similarities, there are important differences. MMN is usually considered resistant to corticosteroid therapy and the first line agent in this disorder is intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg). MADSAM neuropathy can be responsive to prednisone or IVIg, and has a profile more analogous to classic CIDP with regards to its laboratory features and treatment response.

Progress in the pathogenesis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

This decade has seen the discovery of one cause for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS)--mutations in the copper/zinc superoxide dismutase (SOD1) gene. Mutant SOD1 has provided an invaluable tool for transgenic and cellular experiments designed to elicit the biochemical pathways that are disturbed in ALS. We highlight recent advances in ALS research, including diagnostic issues, new loci for ALS genes, and progress in understanding the toxicity of mutant SOD1. The evidence for persistant viral infection, glutamate-mediated excitotoxicity, oxidative stress, altered neurofilament and peripherin expression, disrupted axonal transport, neurotrophin deficiency, and mitochondrial dysfunction are critically reviewed. As yet, no consensus has been achieved on the pathways that lead to selective neuronal death, and the underlying causes are still unknown in the vast majority of patients. Further clues about genetic susceptibility and environmental triggers are urgently needed so that more effective treatments for ALS can be developed, with the ultimate goal being prevention.

Clinical spectrum of chronic acquired demyelinating polyneuropathies

A number of presentations of chronic demyelinating polyneuropathy have been identified, each distinguished by its phenotypic pattern. In addition to classic chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP), which is characterized clinically by symmetric proximal and distal weakness and sensory loss, several regional variants can be recognized: multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN: asymmetric and pure motor), multifocal acquired demyelinating sensory and motor (MADSAM) neuropathy (asymmetric, sensory, and motor), and distal acquired demyelinating symmetric (DADS) neuropathy (symmetric, distal, sensory, and motor). There are also temporal, pathological, and disease-associated variants. This review describes a clinical scheme for approaching the chronic acquired demyelinating polyneuropathies that leads to a rational use of supportive laboratory studies and treatment options. In addition, we propose new diagnostic criteria for CIDP that more accurately reflect current clinical practice.

Six important themes in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) research, 1999

My assignment was to identify the 6 most important ALS papers published in 1999 but, great to relate, there were too many excellent candidates. Rather than confining the search to individual papers, six major themes seemed appropriate for discussion: 1) The study of transgenic mice that carry a mutated human gene for superoxide dismutase-1 (SOD1) has led to many far-reaching advances in ALS research. The mice are regarded as the best test system to evaluate potential therapies, including creatine. Inconsistencies between efficacy in mice and people are noted, however. 2) Transgenic mice have also been used to evaluate the role of glutamate toxicity in the pathogenesis of ALS, a dominant theory. 3) The role of mitochondria in the pathogenesis of ALS is gathering increasing attention. 4) The role of neurofilaments in the pathogenesis of ALS has provided new twists in mice and people. 5) Motor neuropathy is the most important differential diagnosis of ALS. 6) Gene therapy, as exemplified by the use of stem cells, has been applied successfully to animal models of other inherited diseases of the central nervous system.

The role of antiglycolipid antibodies in peripheral neuropathies

The role of antiglycolipid antibodies in peripheral neuropathy continues to be defined in terms of clinical-serological associations and innovative experimental work establishing the role of these antibodies in pathogenesis. The present review focuses on the major developments in this field over the past 12 months.

Motor neuron disease--a review

It is now clear that patients with MND are best managed using a multi-disciplinary approach conforming to evidence-based guidelines. Whilst scientific advances into the aetiology of MND have been of great importance in both the understanding of this and other neurodegenerative disease, they have only recently led to therapy directed at disease progression. The management of patients with MND remains largely supportive but it is hoped that the future may hold better prospects for those with the disease.