Botulinum toxin (Dysport) treatment of hip adductor spasticity in multiple sclerosis: a prospective, randomised, double blind, placebo controlled, dose ranging study

The Role of Botulinum Toxin Type-A in Spasticity: Research Trends from a Bibliometric Analysis

Botulinum toxin type-A (BoNT-A) has emerged as a key therapeutic agent for the management of spasticity. This paper presents a comprehensive bibliometric and visual analysis of research concerning BoNT-A treatment of spasticity to elucidate current trends and future directions in this research area. A search was conducted in the Web of Science database for articles focused on the use of BoNT-A in spasticity published between 2000 and 2022. We extracted various metrics, including counts of publications and contributions from different countries, institutions, authors, and journals. Analytical methods in CiteSpace were employed for the examination of co-citations, collaborations, and the co-occurrence of keywords. Our search yielded 1489 publications. Analysis revealed a consistent annual increase in research output. The United States, United Kingdom, and Italy were the leading contributors. The top institution in this research was Assistance Publique Hopitaux, Paris. The journal containing the highest number of relevant publications was Toxins. Key frequently occurring keywords were 'stroke', 'cerebral palsy', 'adult spasticity', and 'upper extremity'. This study identified 12 clusters of keywords and 15 clusters of co-cited references, indicating the main focus areas and emerging themes in this field. This study comprehensively analyzed and summarized trends in BoNT-A research in the field of spasticity over the past 22 years.

Functional outcomes following surgery for spastic hip adductor muscles in ambulatory and non-ambulatory adults

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate functional outcomes of surgery of spastic hip adductor muscles (obturator neurotomy with or without adductor longus tenotomy) in ambulatory and non-ambulatory patients, using preoperatively defined personalized goals.

DESIGN

Retrospective observational descriptive study.

PATIENTS

Twenty-three patients with adductor spasticity who underwent obturator neurotomy between May 2016 and May 2021 at the Clinique des Cèdres, Cornebarrieu, France, were included.

METHODS

Postoperative functional results were evaluated in accordance with the Goal Attainment Scaling method. Patients were considered "responders" if their score was ≥ 0. Secondary outcomes included spasticity, strength, hip range of motion and change in ambulatory capacity. When data were available, a comparison of pre- and postoperative 3-dimensional instrumented gait analysis was also performed.

RESULTS

Among the 23 patients only 3 were non-walkers. Seventeen/22 patients achieved their main goal and 14/23 patients achieved all their goals. Results were broadly similar for both walking goals (inter-knee contact, inter-feet contact, fluidity, walking perimeter, toe drag) and non-walking goals (intimacy, transfer, pain, posture, dressing).

CONCLUSION

Surgery of spastic hip adductor muscles results in functional improvement in ambulation, hygiene, dressing and posture and can be offered to patients with troublesome adductor overactivity. The use of a motor nerve block is recommended to define relevant goals before the surgery.

Pharmacological and Non-pharmacological Approaches for the Management of Neuropathic Pain in Multiple Sclerosis

Multiple sclerosis is a chronic inflammatory disease that affects the central nervous system and can cause various types of pain including ongoing extremity pain, Lhermitte's phenomenon, trigeminal neuralgia, and mixed pain. Neuropathic pain is a major concern for individuals with multiple sclerosis as it is directly linked to myelin damage in the central nervous system and the management of neuropathic pain in multiple sclerosis is challenging as the options available have limited efficacy and can cause unpleasant side effects. The literature search was conducted across two databases, PubMed, and Google Scholar. Eligible studies included clinical trials, observational studies, meta-analyses, systematic reviews, and narrative reviews. The objective of this article is to provide an overview of literature on pharmacological and non-pharmacological strategies employed in the management of neuropathic pain in multiple sclerosis. Pharmacological options include cannabinoids, muscle relaxants (tizanidine, baclofen, dantrolene), anticonvulsants (benzodiazepines, gabapentin, phenytoin, carbamazepine, lamotrigine), antidepressants (duloxetine, venlafaxine, tricyclic antidepressants), opioids (naltrexone), and botulinum toxin variants, which have evidence from various clinical trials. Non-pharmacological approaches for trigeminal neuralgia may include neurosurgical methods. Non-invasive methods, physical therapy, and psychotherapy (cognitive behavioral therapy, acceptance and commitment therapy and mindfulness-based stress reduction) may be recommended for patients with neuropathic pain in multiple sclerosis. The choice of treatment depends on the severity and type of pain as well as other factors, such as patient preferences and comorbidities. There is a pressing need for healthcare professionals and researchers to prioritize the development of better strategies for managing multiple sclerosis-induced neuropathic pain.

Effects of vibration therapy for post-stroke spasticity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of vibration therapy (VT) in people with post-stroke spasticity (PSS) remains uncertain. This study aims to conduct a comprehensive meta-analysis to assess the effectiveness of VT in PSS.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Physiotherapy Evidence Database, and Web of Science were searched from inception to October 2022 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of VT in people with PSS. The primary outcome was spasticity, and secondary outcomes included pain, motor function, gait performance, and adverse events. A meta‑analysis was performed by pooling the standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS

A total of 12 studies met the inclusion criteria. Overall, VT had significant effects on reducing spasticity (SMD = - 0.77, 95% CI - 1.17 to - 0.36, P < 0.01) and pain (SMD =  - 1.09, 95% CI - 1.74 to - 0.45, P < 0.01), and improving motor function (SMD = 0.42, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.64, P < 0.01) in people with PSS. However, VT had no significant effect on gait performance (SMD =  - 0.23, 95% CI - 0.56-0.10). In addition, subgroup differences in short-term anti-spasticity effects between different vibration subtypes, vibration frequencies, vibration durations, frequency of sessions, control therapy, spasticity distribution, and population classification were not significant.

CONCLUSION

We found that VT significantly alleviated spasticity and pain in people with PSS and improved motor function, but its effect on gait performance was unclear. However, further studies are needed to validate these findings.

Botulinum toxin for motor disorders

Botulinum neurotoxins are a group of biological toxins produced by the gram-negative bacteria Clostridium botulinum. After intramuscular injection, they produce dose-related muscle relaxation, which has proven useful in the treatment of a large number of motor and movement disorders. In this chapter, we discuss the utility of botulinum toxin treatment in three major and common medical conditions related to the dysfunction of the motor system, namely dystonia, tremor, and spasticity. A summary of the existing literature is provided along with different techniques of injection including those recommended by the authors.

[The use of botulinum toxin type A in symptomatic therapy and medical rehabilitation of patients with multiple sclerosis]

The review of the current state of the problem of symptomatic therapy and medical rehabilitation (MR) of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) is presented. The search was conducted in the databases Medline, Web of Science, PubMed and Scopus. Information is given about the most common symptoms of MS, among which sensory and motor disorders, bladder dysfunction, and pain have the greatest impact on the quality of life of patients, their functioning and independence in everyday life. The clinical characteristics of spasticity syndrome in MS and its relationship with quality of life indicators are considered. The features of the use of botulinum therapy (BT) in MS are considered. A high level of effectiveness of the use of BT in the treatment of neurogenic hyperactivity of detrusor and neurogenic bladder (the level of persuasiveness of recommendation A) and spasticity (the level of persuasiveness of recommendation B) is shown. Symptomatic treatment of MS and MR with the use of multidisciplinary programs helps to reduce disability, improve the quality of life of patients. When choosing symptomatic treatment and MR methods, it is customary to focus on the needs of patients.

Novel Use of Botulinum Toxin in Long-Standing Adductor-Related Groin Pain: A Case Series

BACKGROUND

Adductor-related groin pain (ARGP) is the most common groin injury in athletes. If conservative treatment fails, then adductor tenotomy to relieve tension can be considered. The use of botulinum toxin A (BoNT-A) has shown good results in other musculoskeletal pathologies.

OBJECTIVE

Assess the effectiveness of BoNT-A injections in ARGP in cases where usual treatment has failed.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Orthopedic Medicine and Rehabilitation Unit, University of Bordeaux.

PARTICIPANTS

Fifty patients treated by BoNT-A injection in ARGP after failure of medical and/or surgical treatment were included in this study.

INTERVENTIONS

One or several adductor muscles were injected with BoNT-A, according to clinical evaluation using ultrasound and electrical stimulation guidance. Patients were followed up at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary assessment criterion was the improvement of Hip and Groin Outcome Score subscales at day 30. Secondary outcomes included pain intensity and impact on sport, work, and quality of life (QoL), the Blazina scale, and side effects.

RESULTS

All the first 50 injected patients (45 male and 5 female patients) were included. A significant improvement was noted regarding the majority of Hip and Groin Outcome Score subscales at day 30 ( P < 0.05). Pain intensity and its impacts were both significantly reduced ( P < 0.001): less sport and professional disability and lower impact on QoL. Severity of symptoms assessed by the Blazina scale was significantly reduced ( P < 0.001). The improvements remained significant until 1-year postinjection.

CONCLUSIONS

BoNT-A is promising as a new treatment for ARGP but should be fully assessed in a randomized controlled trial.

Goal-Setting in Multiple Sclerosis-Related Spasticity Treated with Botulinum Toxin: The GASEPTOX Study

Spasticity is one of the most disabling symptoms in multiple sclerosis (MS). Botulinum toxin injection (BTI) is a first-line treatment for focal spasticity. There is a lack of evidence of a functional improvement following BTI in MS-related spasticity. To describe goal-setting for BTI in MS, and evaluate the degree of attainment, using goal attainment scaling (GAS) 4-to-6 weeks after injection session, a one-year multi-center retrospective observational study assessing goal-setting and achievement during BTI session in spastic patients with MS was set up. Following the GAS method, patients and their physicians set up to three goals and scored their achievement 4 to 6 weeks thereafter. Commonly used goals from three centers were combined into a standardized list and 125 single BTI sessions were analyzed. The most frequent goals regarded lower limb (LL) impairments (equinovarus foot, toe claw) or locomotion (stability, walking distance, clinging) and accounted for 89.1%, versus 10.9% for upper limb (UL), mostly for mild-to-moderate MS. Overall, goals were frequently achieved (85.77%) mainly when related to gait and mobility rather than hygiene and ease of care. This study gives an overview on the most frequent, relevant, and achievable goals to be set in real-life practice of BTI for spasticity management in MS.

Assessment, goal setting, and botulinum neurotoxin a therapy in the management of post-stroke spastic movement disorder: updated perspectives on best practice

INTRODUCTION

Post-stroke spastic movement disorder (PS-SMD) appears up to 20% in the first week following stroke and 40% in the chronic phase. It may create major hurdles to overcome in early stroke rehabilitation and as one relevant factor that reduces quality of life to a major degree in the chronic phase.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, we discuss predictors,early identification, clinical assessments, goal setting, and management in multiprofessional team, including Botulinum neurotoxin A (BoNT-A) injection for early and chronic management of PS-SMD.

EXPERT OPINION

The earlier PS-SMD is recognized and managed, the better the outcome will be. The comprehensive management in the subacute or chronic phase of PS-SMD with BoNT-A injections requires detailed assessment, patient-centered goal setting, technical-guided injection, effective dosing of BoNT-A per site, muscle, and session and timed adjunctive treatment, delivered in a multi-professional team approach in conjunction with physical treatment. Evidence-based data showed BoNT-A injections are safe and effective in managing focal, multifocal, segmental PS-SMD and its complications. If indicated, BoNT-A therapy should be accompanied with adjunctive treatment in adequate time slots. BoNT-A could be added to oral, intrathecal, and surgical treatment in severe multisegmental or generalized PS-SMD to reach patient/caregiver's goals, especially in chronic PS-SMD.

A consensus statement on the use of botulinum toxin in pediatric patients

Botulinum toxin has been used in medicine for the past 30 years. However, there continues to be controversy about the appropriate uses and dosing, especially in the pediatric population. A panel of nine pediatric physiatrists from different regions and previous training programs in the United States were nominated based on institutional reputation and botulinum toxin (BoNT) experience. Based on a review of the current literature, the goal was to provide the rationale for recommendations on the administration of BoNT in the pediatric population. The goal was not only to review safety, dosing, and injection techniques but also to develop a consensus on the appropriate uses in the pediatric population. In addition to upper and lower limb spasticity, the consensus also provides recommendations for congenital muscular torticollis, cervical dystonia, sialorrhea, and brachial plexus palsies.

Nabiximols and botulinum toxin injections for patients with multiple sclerosis: efficacy on spasticity and spasms in a single-centre experience

BACKGROUND

Spasticity is a common and disabling symptom in patients with multiple sclerosis (PwMS): as highlighted by many epidemiological studies, it is often a severe and not well treated. Despite the availability of evidence-based spasticity management guidelines, there is still great variability in everyday therapeutic approach, especially for the most complex cases.

METHODS

In our single-centre study, we retrospectively evaluated PwMS-treated nabiximols and botulinum toxin injections (BTI) from July 2015 to April 2019. Clinical and demographic data were collected. The severity of spasticity and spasms was recorded by modified Ashworth Scale (mAS) and Penn Spasm Frequency Scale (PSFS) at baseline and after 1 month of treatment.

RESULTS

We evaluated 64 treatments for MS-related spasticity: 28 patients were treated with BTI and 36 patients with nabiximols. We found that both BTI and nabiximols are effective in reducing mAS (nabiximols, BTI: p < 0.001), PSFS frequency (nabiximols: p = 0.001, BTI: p = 0.008) and intensity (nabiximols: p = 0.001, BTI p = 0.016). No differences were found when directly comparing the efficacy of the two treatments, except for a statistical trend favouring BTI on spasms intensity (p = 0.091). Eleven patients were treated with both BTI and nabiximols, and only four patients continued both treatments. All dropouts were due to inefficacy of at least one of the two therapies.

CONCLUSIONS

Our single-centre experience highlights that both BTI and nabiximols are effective in treating multiple sclerosis-related spasticity; however, BTI treatment may be more effective on spasms intensity. Combined nabiximols and BTI treatment could represent a therapeutic option for severe spasticity.

The Use of Botulinum Toxin for Treatment of Spasticity

Spasticity is one component of the upper motor neuron (UMN) syndrome resulting from a multitude of neurologic conditions, such as stroke, brain injury, spinal cord injury, multiple sclerosis, and cerebral palsy. It is clinically recognized as a phenomenon of velocity-dependent increase in resistance, i.e., hypertonia. Recent advances in the pathophysiology of spasticity improve our understanding of mechanisms underlying this complex phenomenon and its relations to other components of UMN syndrome (weakness and disordered motor control), as well as the resultant clinical problems. This theoretical framework provides a foundation to set up treatment goals and to guide goal-oriented clinical assessment and treatment. Among a spectrum of treatment options, botulinum toxin (BoNT) therapy is the preferred treatment for focal spasticity. The evidence is very robust that BoNT therapy effectively reduces spasticity; however, it does not improve voluntary movement. In this chapter, we highlight a few issues on how to achieve the best clinical outcomes of BoNT therapy, such as dosing, dilution, guidance techniques, adjunctive therapies, early treatment, repeated injections, and central effects, as well as the ways to improve motor function in selected subgroups of patients with spasticity. We also discuss the reasons of poor responses to BoNT therapy and when not to use BoNT therapy.

Pharmacotherapeutic Options for Managing Pain in Multiple Sclerosis

Pain is a major matter for patients with multiple sclerosis; treatment response is frequently inadequate, with a significant impact on quality of life. The estimated prevalence of pain in multiple sclerosis ranges widely (26-86%), and different subtypes of pain, mediated by specific pathophysiological mechanisms, are described. The aim of this narrative review, performed using a systematic search methodology, was to provide current, evidence-based, knowledge about the pharmacological treatment of the different kinds of pain in multiple sclerosis. We searched for relevant papers within PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and the Clinical Trials database (ClinicalTrials.gov), considering publications up to November 2019. Two authors independently selected studies for inclusion, data extraction, and bias assessment. A total of 27 randomized controlled trials were identified, but in only a few cases, patients with different pain qualities were stratified. Following a mechanism-based approach, treatment of paroxysmal pain and painful tonic spasms should be based on sodium-channel blockers, whereas treatment of ongoing extremity pain should be based on gabapentinoids and antidepressants.

Long-Term Effects With Potential Clinical Importance of Botulinum Toxin Type-A on Mechanics of Muscles Exposed

Botulinum toxin type-A (BTX-A) is widely used for spasticity management and mechanically aims at reducing passive resistance at the joint and widening joint range of movement. However, recent experiments on acute BTX-A effects showed that the injected rat tibialis anterior (TA) muscle’s passive forces increased, and the length range of active force exertion (l_range) did not change. Additionally, BTX-A was shown to spread into non-injected muscles in the compartment and affect their mechanics. Whether those effects persist in the long term is highly important, but unknown. The aim was to test the following hypotheses with experiments conducted in the anterior crural compartment of the rat: In the long term, BTX-A (1) maintains l_range, (2) increases passive forces of the injected TA muscle, and (3) spreads into non-injected extensor digitorum longus (EDL) and the extensor hallucis longus (EHL) muscles, also affecting their active and passive forces. Male Wistar rats were divided into two groups: BTX-A and Control (0.1 units of BTX-A or only saline was injected into the TA). Isometric forces of the muscles were measured simultaneously 1-month post-injection. The targeted TA was lengthened, whereas the non-targeted EDL and EHL were kept at constant length. Hydroxyproline analysis was done to quantify changes in the collagen content of studied muscles. Two-way ANOVA test (for muscle forces, factors: TA length and animal group) and unpaired t or Mann-Whitney U test (for l_range and collagen content, where appropriate) were used for statistical analyses (P < 0.05). BTX-A caused significant effects. TA: active forces decreased (maximally by 75.2% at short and minimally by 48.3%, at long muscle lengths), l_range decreased (by 22.9%), passive forces increased (by 12.3%), and collagen content increased (approximately threefold). EDL and EHL: active forces decreased (up to 66.8%), passive force increased (minimally by 62.5%), and collagen content increased (approximately twofold). Therefore, hypothesis 1 was rejected and 2 and 3 were confirmed indicating that previously reported acute BTX-A effects persist and advance in the long term. A narrower l_range and an elevated passive resistance of the targeted muscle are unintended mechanical effects, whereas spread of BTX-A into other compartmental muscles indicates the presence of uncontrolled mechanical effects.

High Dosage of Botulinum Toxin Type A in Adult Subjects with Spasticity Following Acquired Central Nervous System Damage: Where Are We at?

Spasticity is a common disabling disorder in adult subjects suffering from stroke, brain injury, multiple sclerosis (MS) and spinal cord injury (SCI). Spasticity may be a disabling symptom in people during rehabilitation and botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) has become the first-line therapy for the local form. High BTX-A doses are often used in clinical practice. Advantages and limitations are debated and the evidence is unclear. Therefore, we analysed the efficacy, safety and evidence for BTX-A high doses. Studies published from January 1989 to February 2020 were retrieved from MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register. Only obabotulinumtoxinA (obaBTX-A), onabotulinumtoxinA (onaBTX-A), and incobotulinumtoxinA (incoBTX-A) were considered. The term “high dosage” indicated ≥ 600 U. Thirteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Studies had variable method designs, sample sizes and aims, with only two randomised controlled trials. IncoBTX-A and onaBTX-A were injected in three and eight studies, respectively. BTX-A high doses were used predominantly in treating post-stroke spasticity. No studies were retrieved regarding treating spasticity in MS and SCI. Dosage of BTX-A up to 840 U resulted efficacious and safety without no serious adverse events (AEs). Evidence is insufficient to recommend high BTX-A use in clinical practice, but in selected patients, the benefits of high dose BTX-A may be clinically acceptable.

Botulinum toxin for the management of spasticity in multiple sclerosis: the Italian botulinum toxin network study

BACKGROUND

Botulinum toxin (BT) is an effective and safe treatment for spasticity, with limited evidence in multiple sclerosis (MS). We aim to describe the use of BT for the management of MS spasticity in the clinical practice, its combination with other anti-spastic treatments in MS and possible MS clinical correlates.

METHODS

This is a multicentre cross-sectional observational study including 386 MS patients, receiving BT for spasticity in 19 Italian centres (age 53.6 ± 10.9 years; female 228 (59.1%); disease duration 18.7 ± 9.2 years; baseline Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) 6.5 (2.0-9.0)).

RESULTS

BT was used for improving mobility (n = 170), functioning in activities of daily living (n = 56), pain (n = 56), posturing-hygiene (n = 63) and daily assistance (n = 41). BT formulations were AbobotulinumtoxinA (n = 138), OnabotulinumtoxinA (n = 133) and IncobotulinumtoxinA (n = 115). After conversion to unified dose units, higher BT dose was associated with higher EDSS (Coeff = 0.591; p < 0.001), higher modified Ashworth scale (Coeff = 0.796; p < 0.001) and non-ambulatory patients (Coeff = 209.382; p = 0.006). Lower BT dose was used in younger patients (Coeff = - 1.746; p = 0.009), with relapsing-remitting MS (Coeff = - 60.371; p = 0.012). BT dose was higher in patients with previous BT injections (Coeff = 5.167; p = 0.001), and with concomitant treatments (Coeff = 43.576; p = 0.022). Three patients (0.7%) reported on post-injection temporary asthenia/weakness (n = 2) and hypophonia (n = 1).

CONCLUSION

BT was used for spasticity and its consequences from the early stages of MS, without significant adverse effects. MS-specific goals and injection characteristics can be used to refer MS patients to BT treatment, to decide for the strategy of BT injections and to guide the design of future clinical trials and observational studies.

Use of botulinum toxin for movement disorders

The term movement disorders encompasses all disorders hypokinetic and hyperkinetic, which were previously known as extrapyramidal syndromes. With the definition of movement disorders and their diagnostic criteria and classifications, new studies for therapeutics could be performed. New drugs were launched, functional neurosurgery was developed, and the introduction of botulinum toxin (BoNT) for hyperkinesias was introduced. BoNT is an important therapy for dystonia, tics, myoclonus, and tremors. The aim of this review is to present the new and well-established uses of BoNT for movement disorders.

[Treatment of a spastic increase of muscle tone in multiple sclerosis with botulinum toxin]

The article presents data of the reviews, consensus and recommendations on the use of botulinum toxin type A (BTA) in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients with spasticity syndrome. It presents the results of randomized clinical trials that confirm the efficacy and favorable safety profile of dysport in treatment of MS patients. The complex approach to spasticity therapy and rehabilitation in MS is discussed.

Are adverse outcome rates higher in multiple sclerosis patients after total hip arthroplasty?

Aims

This study compared multiple sclerosis (MS) patients who underwent primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) with a matched cohort. Specifically, we evaluated: 1) implant survivorship; 2) functional outcomes (modified Harris Hip Scores (mHHS), Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Joint Replacement (HOOS JR), and modified Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (mMSIS) scores (with the MS cohort also evaluated based on the disease phenotype)); 3) physical therapy duration and return to function; 4) radiographic outcomes; and 5) complications.

Patients and Methods

We reviewed our institution's database to identify MS patients who underwent THA between January 2008 and June 2016. A total of 34 MS patients (41 hips) were matched in a 1:2 ratio to a cohort of THA patients who did not have MS, based on age, body mass index (BMI), and Charlson/Deyo score. Patient records were reviewed for complications, and their functional outcomes and radiographs were reviewed at their most recent follow-up.

Results

Compared with the matched cohort, MS patients had lower all-cause implant survivorship at eight years (91.5% (95% confidence interval (CI) 82.7 to 100) vs 98.7% (95% CI 96.2 to 100)) (p = 0.033), lower mHHS scores (66 vs 80, p < 0.001), and HOOS JR scores (79 vs 88, p = 0.009). Multiple sclerosis patients also required more physiotherapy (five weeks vs three weeks, p = 0.002) and took longer to return to baseline (seven weeks vs five weeks, p = 0.010) than the matched cohort. Furthermore, MS patients had more complications than the non-MS patients (six vs zero, p < 0.001). The worse outcomes of the MS group can potentially be explained by predisposition of these patients to mechanical complications and progression of their disease during the period of this study, as demonstrated by worsening of the mMSIS scores (2.9 vs 3.4; p = 0.008).

Conclusion

MS patients had lower implant survivorship, lower functional outcome scores, and increased complication rates; in addition, MS patients took longer to return to their baseline functional level after THA. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:875-81.

A mixed treatment comparison on efficacy and safety of treatments for spasticity caused by multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

This study is aimed at providing a quantitative evaluation on different therapies of spasticity caused by multiple sclerosis.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed and Embase database.

REVIEW METHODS

We searched for randomized controlled trials that met the requirements. Percentages of improved patients' spasticity scale, mild adverse effect and severe adverse effect were extracted as outcomes. The forest plots accompanied with surface under the cumulative ranking curves were used to reveal the efficacy and safety of these therapies.

RESULTS

In all, 23 randomized controlled trials with a total of 2720 patients were included in our study. Cannabinoids and botulinum toxin had shown a significantly better efficacy than placebo in the percentage of improved patients. Botulinum toxin also showed such significant difference compared with tizanidine and baclofen. No significant difference was found in spasticity scale. Cannabinoids, tizanidine and diazepam had significantly more mild adverse effect reports than placebo. Surface under the cumulative ranking curves suggested that cannabinoids, botulinum toxin and transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation were preferable therapies.

CONCLUSIONS

We recommended botulinum toxin as the optimal intervention for multiple sclerosis-related spasticity. Cannabinoids and transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation could also be considered as multiple sclerosis-related spasticity treatments but their safety remained to be verified.

Ixcellence Network®: an international educational network to improve current practice in the management of cervical dystonia or spastic paresis by botulinum toxin injection

Botulinum toxin is a well-established treatment for a number of conditions involving muscle hyperactivity, such as focal dystonia and spastic paresis. However, current injection practice is not standardized and there is a clear need for structured training. An international group of experts in the management of patients with cervical dystonia (CD) and spastic paresis created a steering committee (SC). For each therapeutic area, the SC developed a core slide set on best practice, based on the literature. International sites of expertise were identified for training and courses were designed to include lectures and casebased learning. Where possible, courses received accreditation from the European Union of Medical Specialists (UEMS). Each course was peer reviewed by the SC, the UEMS accreditation board and the attendees themselves (through evaluation questionnaires). Attendees' feedback was shared with the SC and the trainers to tailor future training sessions. From the program launch in 2012 to December 2014, 328 physicians from 34 countries were trained in a total of 58 courses; 67% of the courses focused on spastic paresis and 33% on CD. Of the 225 (69%) physicians who completed feedback forms, 95% rated their course as 'above average/excellent' in meeting the preset learning objectives. Most (90%) physicians declared that attending a course would lead them to change their practice. The development of the 'Ixcellence Network' for continuous medical education in the fields of spastic paresis and CD has provided a novel and interactive way of training physicians with previous experience in botulinum toxin injection.

Towards flexible and tailored botulinum neurotoxin dosing regimens for focal dystonia and spasticity - Insights from recent studies

Botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) is an effective, well-tolerated, and well-established option for the treatment of dystonic and spastic movement disorders. However, a single approach does not suit all patients, even within one disease indication. The degree of flexibility in treatment protocols is determined by individual product licenses, which often lag behind real-world clinical experience. A number of patient/practitioner surveys conducted recently have highlighted a desire for greater flexibility than that currently approved, both in BoNT doses and in the intervals between consecutive doses. New evidence arising from research conducted during the last few years has opened new avenues for tailoring BoNT treatment to patients' needs. Data suggest that escalating incobotulinumtoxinA doses enables treatment of a greater number of spasticity patterns than current dose limitations allow, without compromising safety or tolerability. Similarly, in patients with cervical dystonia (CD), repeated injections of incobotulinumtoxinA at intervals as early as 6 weeks after a previous treatment, based on individual patient need, were effective and well tolerated. Here, the BoNT doses and dosing intervals currently indicated in the USA and European Union are reviewed, together with the use of BoNT for the treatment of spasticity, CD, and blepharospasm. Opportunities for tailored BoNT therapy are also discussed.

Does Multiple Sclerosis Affect the Inpatient Perioperative Outcomes After Total Hip Arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND

There is a paucity of studies evaluating the short-term perioperative outcomes of total hip arthroplasty (THA) in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients. Therefore, this study evaluated (1) patient factors; and (2) patient outcomes in MS THA patients compared to non-MS THA patients.

METHODS

The Nationwide Inpatient Sample from 2002 to 2013 identified 5899 MS and 2,723,652 non-MS THA patients. Yearly trends, demographics, and comorbidities were compared, and then non-MS THA patients were matched (3:1) to MS THA patients by age, gender, race, comorbidity score, and surgery year. Regression analyses compared perioperative complications (any, surgical, medical), length of stay (LOS), and discharge dispositions.

RESULTS

The annual prevalence of MS in THA patients increased from 1.36 per 1000 THAs in 2002 to 2.54 per 1000 THAs in 2013 (P = .004). MS patients were younger, more likely female, take corticosteroids, have hip osteonecrosis, and have gait abnormalities. Compared to matched cohort, MS patients had a higher risk of any surgical (odds ratio [OR] = 1.18; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.02-1.37) and any medical (OR = 1.55; 95% CI, 1.34-1.81) complications, an 8.24% longer mean LOS (95% CI, 5.61-10.94; <0.0001) and were more likely to be discharged to a care facility (OR = 2.09; 95% CI, 1.82-2.40).

CONCLUSION

Orthopedic surgeons should be cognizant of the potential increased risks after THA in MS patients. Neurologists and other practitioners may help optimize and enhance the preoperative care of potential THA candidates, and provide guidance as to the appropriate timing of intervention for hip issues in MS patients.

Botulinum Toxin Treatment in Multiple Sclerosis-a Review

Purpose of review The purpose of this review is to provide updated information on the role of botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) therapy in multiple sclerosis (MS). This review aims to answer which symptoms of multiple sclerosis may be amenable to BoNT therapy. Recent findings We searched the literature on the efficacy of BoNTs for treatment of MS symptoms up to April 1st 2017 via the Yale University Library's search engine including but not limited to Pub Med and Ovis SP. The level of efficacy was defined according to the assessment's criteria set forth by the Subcommittee on Guideline Development of the American Academy of Neurology. Significant efficacy was found for two indications based on the available blinded studies (class I and II) and has been suggested for several others through open-label clinical trials. Summary There is level A evidence (effective- two or more class I) that injection of BoNT-A into the bladder's detrusor muscle improves MS-related neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO) and MS-related overactive (OA) bladder. There is level B evidence (probably effective- two class II studies) for utility of intramuscular BoNT-A injections for spasticity of multiple sclerosis. Emerging data based on retrospective class IV studies demonstrates that intramuscular injection of BoNTs may help other symptoms of MS such as focal tonic spasms, focal myokymia, spastic dysphagia, and double vision in internuclear ophthalmoplegia. There is no data on MS-related trigeminal neuralgia and sialorrhea, two conditions which have been shown to respond to BoNT therapy in non-MS population.

Determinants of botulinum toxin discontinuation in multiple sclerosis: a retrospective study

The purpose of the present study was to investigate the long-term persistence to treatment with botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) for multiple sclerosis (MS)-related spasticity and the determinants of BoNT-A discontinuation in daily clinical setting. We retrospectively collected data of patients who started BoNT-A injections and underwent regular follow-up visits. Determinants of BoNT-A discontinuation were explored in a time-to-event Cox regression analysis which included as independent variables a large set of demographic and clinical characteristics. A total of 185 patients started BoNT-A injections from 2002 to 2014 and were followed up to September 2016. Of them, data on 121 were considered in our analysis. At follow-up, 53 (44%) patients were still on treatment and 68 (56%) patients discontinued BoNT-A after a median time of 1.2 years [interval 6 months to 7.4 years]. The reasons for discontinuation were loss of efficacy (n = 45), logistic problems or barriers to reach the structure (n = 16), and adverse events (n = 7). The absence of caregiver (hazard ratio = 1.69, p = 0.03) and lack of regular rehabilitation (hazard ratio = 1.78, p = 0.02) were two independent predictors for BoNT-A discontinuation. Our study confirms the beneficial effect of combining BoNT-A injections with rehabilitation and highlights the crucial role of caregivers for achieving better long-term outcomes in people with MS suffering from spasticity.

Botulinum toxin therapy for treatment of spasticity in multiple sclerosis: review and recommendations of the IAB-Interdisciplinary Working Group for Movement Disorders task force

Botulinum toxin (BT) therapy is an established treatment of spasticity due to stroke. For multiple sclerosis (MS) spasticity this is not the case. IAB-Interdisciplinary Working Group for Movement Disorders formed a task force to explore the use of BT therapy for treatment of MS spasticity. A formalised PubMed literature search produced 55 publications (3 randomised controlled trials, 3 interventional studies, 11 observational studies, 2 case studies, 35 reviews, 1 guideline) all unanimously favouring the use of BT therapy for MS spasticity. There is no reason to believe that BT should be less effective and safe in MS spasticity than it is in stroke spasticity. Recommendations include an update of the current prevalence of MS spasticity and its clinical features according to classifications used in movement disorders. Immunological data on MS patients already treated should be analysed with respect to frequencies of MS relapses and BT antibody formation. Registration authorities should expand registration of BT therapy for spasticity regardless of its aetiology. MS specialists should consider BT therapy for symptomatic treatment of spasticity.

Pharmacological management of spasticity in multiple sclerosis: Systematic review and consensus paper

Background and objectives:

Treatment of spasticity poses a major challenge given the complex clinical presentation and variable efficacy and safety profiles of available drugs. We present a systematic review of the pharmacological treatment of spasticity in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients.

Methods:

Controlled trials and observational studies were identified. Scientific evidence was evaluated according to pre-specified levels of certainty.

Results:

The evidence supports the use of baclofen, tizanidine and gabapentin as first-line options. Diazepam or dantrolene could be considered if no clinical improvement is seen with the previous drugs. Nabiximols has a positive effect when used as add-on therapy in patients with poor response and/or tolerance to first-line oral treatments. Despite limited evidence, intrathecal baclofen and intrathecal phenol show a positive effect in severe spasticity and suboptimal response to oral drugs.

Conclusion:

The available studies on spasticity treatment offer some insight to guide clinical practice but are of variable methodological quality. Large, well-designed trials are needed to confirm the effectiveness of antispasticity agents and to produce evidence-based treatment algorithms.

Early physiotherapy after injection of botulinum toxin increases the beneficial effects on spasticity in patients with multiple sclerosis

Objective : To determine whether additional physiotherapy increases botulinum toxin type A effects in reducing spasticity in patients with multiple sclerosis.

Design : A single-blind, randomized, controlled pilot trial with a 12-week study period.

Subjects : Thirty-eight patients with progressive multiple sclerosis affected by focal spasticity and who were observed at the Multiple Sclerosis Centre operating in the S. Andrea Hospital in Rome.

Interventions : For intervention all patients received botulinum toxin type A; the treatment group also received additional physiotherapy to optimize management through passive or active exercise and stretching regimens.

Main measures : To measure objective and subjective level of spasticity, patients were assessed at baseline, 2, 4 and 12 weeks post treatment by Modified Ashworth Scale and visual analogue scale.

Results : When compared with the control group, we found a significant decrease of spasticity by Modified Ashworth Scale (P < 0.01 by t-test) in the treatment group at week 2 (2.73 versus 3.22), week 4 (2.64 versus 3.33) and week 12 (2.68 versus 3.33). The mean (%) difference in Modified Ashworth Scale score between baseline and the end of follow-up was —0.95 (26.1) in the treatment group and —0.28 (7.7) in the control group (P < 0.01). The combined treatment proved also to be more effective by visual analogue scale (P < 0.01) at week 4 (6.95 versus 5.50) and at week 12 (7.86 versus 6.56) but not at week 2 (5.18 versus 5.50; P = 0.41).

Conclusions : Our data suggest that physiotherapy in combination with botulinum toxin type A injection can improve overall response to botulinum toxin.

Total knee arthroplasty in multiple sclerosis

We present a case report of total knee arthroplasty complicated by spasticity and contractures in a patient with multiple sclerosis (MS). Four previous case reports in the literature describe adverse outcomes after total knee arthroplasty in persons with MS secondary to severe spasticity. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative considerations for persons with MS, which may help to improve functional outcomes, are discussed. Prospective research is needed among persons with MS to help determine the timing and selection of persons for arthroplasty and to minimize complications related to spasticity.

Systematic Literature Review of AbobotulinumtoxinA in Clinical Trials for Lower Limb Spasticity

To elucidate clinical trial efficacy, safety, and dosing practices of AbobotulinumtoxinA (ABO) treatment in adult patients with lower limb spasticity.A systematic literature review was performed to identify randomized controlled trials of ABO in the treatment of adult lower limb spasticity.Of the 295 records identified, 6 primary publications evaluated ABO for the management of lower limb spasticity of various etiologies and were evaluated. Total ABO doses ranged between 500 and 2000 U for lower limb spasticity, depending on the muscles injected. All studies in lower limb spasticity showed statistically significant reduction in muscle tone based on Modified Ashworth Scale of ABO versus placebo. Significant effects on active movement and pain were demonstrated albeit less consistently. ABO was generally well tolerated across the individual studies; most adverse events reported were considered unrelated to treatment. Treatment-related adverse events included but not limited to fatigue, local pain at injection site, hypertonia, dry mouth, weakness of the noninjected muscle, abnormal gait, and urinary tract infection.These data from 6 randomized clinical studies provide the beginnings of an evidence base for the use of ABO to reduce lower limb spasticity. Ongoing studies in this area will add to this evidence base.

Safety and Efficacy of Botulinum Toxin A in Children Undergoing Lower Limb Lengthening and Deformity Correction: Results of a Double-blind, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Lengthening of the lower limb is a complex procedure in which pain management and complications such as pin-site infections and muscle contractures impact the family and affect the child's quality of life. As a result, the paralytic and antinociceptive actions of neurotoxins may be indicated in managing these complications; however, few studies have explored ways to improve outcomes after lengthenings. The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of botulinum toxin A (BTX-A) in children undergoing lower limb lengthenings and deformity correction.

METHODS

Participants with a congenital or acquired deformity of the lower extremity requiring surgery to one limb were randomized to receiving either BTX-A as a single dose of 10 units per kilogram body weight, or an equivalent volume of saline solution. Pain, medication, quality of life, and physical function were assessed at different time-points. Adverse events were recorded in all participants. T test and χ tests were used to compare potential differences across both groups.

RESULTS

Mean age of the 125 participants was 12.5 years (range, 5 to 21 y), and lengthenings averaged 4.2 cm. Maximum pain scores on day 1 postoperatively were lower in the BTX-A group (P=0.03) than in the placebo group, and remained significant favoring botox when stratifying by location of lengthening (femur vs. tibia). Clinical benefits for BTX-A were found for 3 quality of life domains at mid-distraction and end-distraction. When stratifying according to location of lengthening, there were significantly fewer pin-site infections in the tibia favoring botox (P=0.03). The amount of adverse events and bone healing indices were no different in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical differences in quality of life, the lower pain on the first postoperative day, and the lower number of pin-site infections in the tibia favoring BTX-A support its use as an adjunctive treatment to the lengthening process. The detailed analyses of pain patterns help inform families on the pain expectations during lower limb lengthenings. The amount of adverse events were no different in both groups, and bone healing rates were similar, indicating that the use of BTX-A in children undergoing limb lengthening and deformity correction is safe.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I.

Relationship Between Botulinum Toxin, Spasticity, and Pain: a Survey of Patient Perception

Objective: To assess the prevalence of pain in adults with spasticity and to assess the association between the subjective experience of pain and spasticity. Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: outpatient spasticity management clinic of a rehabilitation centre. Patients: Patients with upper motor neuron lesions and spasticity (n=131) were recruited. Methods: We assessed pain intensity and location, relationship between spasticity and pain perception, and perception of pain relief from botulinum toxin type-A (BoNTA) injections. Main outcome measures: Pain perception rated on a 10-point numerical rating scale and pain quality. Results: 65% of the patients with spasticity reported presence of pain and 60% described it as an aching pain. More patients reported pain with movement (34%) compared to rest (21%). There was a statistically poor correlation between the severity of pain and spasticity (r=0.16; p>0.05). Most patients (80%) believed that their pain was related to spasticity and 62% reported that BoNTA injections decreased their pain. Conclusions: The high incidence of pain noted within our sample suggests that physicians may have to consider pain management as part of spasticity treatment. Participants reported that their pain was related to their spasticity, and that it decreased after BoNTA treatment. Further study is needed to explore the relationships between objective measures of spasticity and pain.

Adverse Clinical Effects of Botulinum Toxin Intramuscular Injections for Spasticity

OBJECTIVE

The adverse events (AEs) with botulinum toxin type-A (BoNTA), used for indications other than spasticity, are widely reported in the literature. However, the site, dose, and frequency of injections are different for spasticity when compared to the treatment for other conditions and hence the AEs may be different as well. The objective of this study was to summarize the AEs reported in Canada and systematically review the AEs with intramuscular botulinum toxin injections to treat focal spasticity.

METHODS

Data were gathered from Health Canada (2009-2013) and major electronic databases.

RESULTS

In a 4 year period, 285 AEs were reported. OnabotulinumtoxinA (n=272 events): 68% females, 53% serious, 18% hospitalization, and 8% fatalities. The type of AEs reported were - muscle weakness (19%), oropharyngeal (14%), respiratory (14%), eye related (8%), bowel/bladder related (8%), and infection (5%). IncobotulinumtoxinA (n=13): 38% females, 62% serious, and 54% hospitalization. The type of AEs reported were - muscle weakness (15%), oropharyngeal (15%), respiratory (38%), eye related (23%), bowel/bladder related (15%), and infection (15%). Commonly reported AEs in the literature were muscle weakness, pain, oropharyngeal, bowel/bladder, blood circulation, neurological, gait, and respiratory problems.

CONCLUSION

While BoNTA is useful in managing spasticity, future studies need to investigate the factors that can minimize AEs. A better understanding of the underlying mechanisms of the AEs can also improve guidelines for BoNTA administration and enhance outcomes.

The efficacy of Botulinum Toxin A for limb spasticity on improving activity restriction and quality of life: a systematic review and meta-analysis using the GRADE approach

Objectives:

A systematic review and meta analysis using the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. The aim was to evaluate the efficacy of Botulinum Toxin type A for limb spasticity on improving activity restriction and quality of life outcomes.

Data sources:

Pubmed, Cinahl, Amed, Embase and Cochrane databases. English Language. Search to January 2015.

Review methods:

All randomized, placebo controlled trials on adults with active function or quality of life measures for the arm and leg relating to spasticity of any origin and treated with a single dose of Botulinum Toxin A. Evidence quality was assessed by GRADE.

Results:

Twenty-five studies were reviewed. Meta analysis was carried out on six upper limb and six lower limb studies. Evidence quality for the upper limb was low/very low. A significant result for Botulinum Toxin A was found at four to twelve weeks for the upper limb for active function (SMD 0.32 CI 0.01, 0.62, P=0.04) These effects were maintained for up to six months for Active Research Arm Test (ARAT) only (MD 1.87 CI 0.53, 3.21, P=0.006). Evidence quality was very low for the lower limb. No significant effect was found. Meta analysis was not possible for quality of life measures.

Conclusion:

Botulinum Toxin A may improve active outcomes in the upper limb but further evidence is needed. No conclusion can be drawn about the effect on active outcomes for the lower limb or for quality of life measures in either limb.

Botulinum toxin for symptomatic therapy in multiple sclerosis

Botulinum toxin (BT) is a neurotoxin that paralyzes muscles by inhibiting release of acetylcholine from presynaptic vesicles at the neuromuscular junction. In people with multiple sclerosis (MS), clinical experience and research studies show that local injection of minute quantities of BT can temporarily control skeletal muscle spasticity, bladder detrusor hyperreflexia, and tremor. Specifically, BT injections have been shown to reduce muscle tone and improve passive function, and possibly improve active function, in patients with spasticity. Injection of BT into the bladder wall is a uniquely effective, safe, and durable treatment in patients with neurogenic detrusor hyperreflexia due to MS who have insufficient response or who do not tolerate oral antimuscarinic medications. This procedure has markedly reduced the need for indwelling catheters and bladder surgery. In addition, a recent study suggests BT may be effective for select patients with MS-associated upper extremity tremor. Appropriate use of BT can improve quality of life for many patients with MS.

Botulinum toxin for neuropathic pain and spasticity: an overview

In recent years, a large body of data has surfaced reporting the therapeutic benefit of botulinum toxin injection in multiple conditions. The aim of this review is: to summarize the highest quality literature pertaining to clinical application of botulinum toxin in neuropathic pain conditions including postherpetic neuralgia, trigeminal neuralgia, diabetic polyneuropathy, post-traumatic neuralgia, carpal tunnel syndrome, complex regional pain syndrome, phantom limb and stump pain, and occipital neuralgia; to provide an overview of the clinical trials using botulinum toxin in adult spasticity; and to assign levels of evidence according to the American Academy of Neurology guidelines. In summary, there is level A evidence for established efficacy in postherpetic neuralgia and adult spasticity; level B evidence for probable efficacy in trigeminal neuralgia and post-traumatic neuralgia; level B evidence for probable lack of efficacy in carpal tunnel syndrome; level C evidence for possible efficacy in diabetic polyneuropathy; and level U (insufficient) evidence in complex regional pain syndrome, phantom limb and stump pain, and occipital neuralgia.

The efficacy of Botulinum Toxin A on improving ease of care in the upper and lower limbs: a systematic review and meta-analysis using the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach

OBJECTIVES

A systematic review and meta-analysis using the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach; evaluating Botulinum Toxin type A efficacy on improving ease of care in the upper/lower limb.

DATA SOURCES

Pubmed, Cinahl, Amed, Embase and Cochrane databases. English Language. Search to July 2014.

REVIEW METHODS

All randomized, placebo controlled trials on adults with difficulty in caring for the upper/lower limb resulting from spasticity of any origin and treated with a single dose of Botulinum Toxin A. Evidence quality was assessed by GRADE.

RESULTS

A total of 32 studies were reviewed. Meta-analysis was carried out on 11 upper limb and three lower limb studies. Evidence quality for the upper limb was moderate. A significant result for Botulinum Toxin A was found at four to 12 weeks for the upper limb (SMD 0.80, CI 0.55, 1.06, p < 0.0001). The effects were maintained for up to six months (SMD 0.48, CI 0.34, 0.62, p < 0.0001). Evidence quality was very low for the lower limb. Meta-analysis was only possible for global assessment of benefit. No significant effect was found. (

PATIENT

RR 1.37 CI (0.94, 2.00) p = 0.11; clinician: RR 1.06 (0.84, 1.34) p = 0.60.)

CONCLUSION

Botulinum Toxin A improves ease of care in the upper limb for up to six months. No conclusion can be drawn for the lower limb.

Symptomatic treatment and management of multiple sclerosis

The range of symptoms which occur in multiple sclerosis (MS) can have disabling functional consequences for patients and lead to significant reductions in their quality of life. MS symptoms can also interact with each other, making their management challenging. Clinical trials aimed at identifying symptomatic therapies have generally been poorly designed and have tended to be underpowered. Therefore, the evidence base for the management of MS symptoms with pharmacologic therapies is not strong and tends to rely upon open-label studies, case reports, and clinical trials with small numbers of patients and poorly validated clinical outcome measures. Recently, there has been a growing interest in the management of MS symptoms with pharmacologic treatments, and better-designed, randomized, double-blind, controlled trials have been reported. This chapter will describe the evidence base predominantly behind the various pharmacologic approaches to the management of MS symptoms, which in most, if not all, cases, requires multidisciplinary input. Drugs routinely recommended for individual symptoms and new therapies, which are currently in the development pipeline, will be reviewed. More interventional therapies related to symptoms that are refractory to pharmacotherapy will also be discussed, where relevant.

Multiple sclerosis in children

The onset of multiple sclerosis (MS) in childhood and adolescence is being increasingly recognized. Relative to MS in adults, little is known about the diagnostic evaluation, clinical course, outcome, and management of MS in children. To remedy some of these deficiencies, pediatric MS clinics have been created in several countries to provide specialized care to, and to study, affected children. Research is currently underway to investigate the pathobiologic features of childhood-onset MS, to study the mechanisms of myelin inflammation and repair, to evaluate patient outcomes collaboratively between the different clinics, and to increase knowledge of pediatric MS for children living with the disease. It is hoped that, through an understanding of the earliest aspects of the MS disease process, critical insights will be gained about the genesis of MS.