Entacapone is beneficial in both fluctuating and non-fluctuating patients with Parkinson's disease: a randomised, placebo controlled, double blind, six month study

The Catechol O-Methyltransferase Inhibitor Entacapone in the Treatment of Parkinson's Disease: Personal Reflections on a First-in-Class Drug Development Programme 40 Years On

In the 1980s, Orion Pharma, then a mid-ranking Nordic area pharmaceutical company, established a drug development programme on the inhibition of catechol O-methyltransferase (COMT). This enzyme, which plays an important role in the inactivation of catecholamine neurotransmitters and drugs with a catechol structure, thus came under consideration as a target in the innovative translational and clinical programme we describe in this historical review. The starting point was the conjecture that a peripherally acting COMT inhibitor might improve entry of levodopa into the brain. This had potentially significant implications for the medical treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD). The rationale was that more efficient delivery of levodopa to the brain might allow the high therapeutic doses of levodopa to be reduced and the dose interval to be extended. Elucidation of structure-activity relations paved the way for the discovery and development of entacapone, a 5-nitrocatechol that was a potent and highly specific inhibitor of COMT. Experience in phase III clinical trials established that entacapone, used as an adjunct to regular or controlled-release levodopa preparations (also including a peripherally acting dopa-decarboxylase inhibitor), increased ON-time and reduced OFF-time and improved clinical condition in patients with PD experiencing wearing-off, often with a reduced daily levodopa dose. Several of these studies also identified that entacapone improved patients' quality of life and was cost-effective. Subsequently, entacapone has been amalgamated into a triple-combination preparation (Stalevo®) with levodopa and carbidopa to create a flexible and convenient drug therapy for patients with PD who have end-of-dose motor fluctuations not stabilised on levodopa/dopa-decarboxylase inhibitor treatment. This review offers a historical perspective on a successful programme of drug development by researchers who played central roles in the progress from exploratory hypothesis to registered pharmaceutical product.

Effectiveness and safety of different catechol-o-methyl transferase inhibitors for patients with parkinson's disease: Systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Levodopa treatment requires the addition of other drugs, such as catechol-O-methyl transferase (COMT) inhibitors, to alleviate motor fluctuations in advanced parkinson's disease (PD). However, the optimal strategy, including the type and dose of COMT inhibitors remains unknown. This systematic review and network meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of different COMT inhibitors and for treating PD patients.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science were screened up to November 20, 2022. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of COMT inhibitors (entacapone, opicapone, tolcapone) for PD patients were included. Eligible outcomes were total ON-time, rate of ON-time >1 h, total daily dose of levodopa therapy, mean change from baseline to final follow up in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) part III scores, adverse events and dyskinesia. Network meta-analyses integrated direct and indirect evidence with placebo as a common comparator.

RESULTS

We identified 18 studies with 7564 patients. Opicapone, entacapone, and tolcapone could increase total ON-time when compared with placebo. However, opicapone (25 mg, MD 4.0, 95%CrI: 1.1-7.5) and opicapone (50 mg, MD 5.1, 95%CrI: 2.2-8.7) statistically significant increase the total ON-time. opicapone and entacapone could increase the rate of ON-time >1 h when compared with placebo. Only opicapone (5 mg) showed no statistically significant with placebo (OR 1.4, 95%CrI: 0.74-2.4). We found that opicapone (50 mg, SURCA, 0.796) is the best option compared with other treatments. TOL (200 mg) was ranked highest in the rank probability test for total daily dose of levodopa therapy, followed by OPI (50 mg), TOL (400 mg) and TOL (100 mg) in order. SUCRA rankings identified TOL (200 mg) as the most likely therapy for increasing adverse events (SUCRA 27.19%), followed by TOL (400 mg, SUCRA 27.20%) and OPI (5 mg, SUCRA 30.81%). The SUCRA probabilities were 91.6%, 75.2%, 67.9%, 59.3%, 45.6%, 41.1%, 35.1%, 24.6% and 9.4% for PLA, TOL (400 mg), ENT (100 mg), ENT (200 mg), OPI (5 mg), TOL (100 mg), OPI (25 mg), OPI (50 mg), and TOL (200 mg) respectively.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, opicapone (50 mg) may be a better choice for treatment PD when compared with other COMT inhibitors.

Comparative efficacy and safety of adjunctive drugs to levodopa for fluctuating Parkinson's disease - network meta-analysis

It remains unclear which adjunctive drug for Parkinson's disease (PD) in combination with levodopa is more effective, tolerable, and safe. We aimed to compare the efficacy, tolerability, and safety among anti-PD drugs from several classes in patients with fluctuating PD who received levodopa through network meta-analysis (NMA). Twelve anti-PD drugs belonging to 4 different drug classes (dopamine agonists, monoamine oxidase type B inhibitors, catechol-O-methyl transferase inhibitors, and an adenosine A2A receptor antagonist) were selected. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing placebo with anti-PD drug or among anti-PD drugs in patients with PD who experienced motor fluctuations or wearing-off and received levodopa. We included 54 RCTs in the analysis. The NMA was performed under a frequentist framework using a random-effects model. The efficacy outcome was change in daily off-time, and the tolerability outcome was discontinuation due to all causes. Safety outcomes included discontinuation due to adverse events (AEs) and the incidence of AEs, dyskinesia, hallucination, and orthostatic hypotension. According to the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) in the NMA, ropinirole transdermal patch (SUCRA, 0.861) ranked the highest in efficacy, followed by pramipexole (0.762), ropinirole extended release (ER) (0.750), and safinamide (0.691). In terms of tolerability, ropinirole (0.954) ranked the highest, followed by pramipexole (0.857), safinamide (0.717), and ropinirole ER (0.708). Each anti-PD drug had different SUCRA ranking profiles for the safety outcomes. These findings suggest that ropinirole, pramipexole, and safinamide are well-balanced anti-PD drugs that satisfy both efficacy and tolerability outcomes.

Clinical benefit of MAO-B and COMT inhibition in Parkinson's disease: practical considerations

Inhibitors of monoamine oxidase B (MAO-B) and catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) are major strategies to reduce levodopa degradation and thus to increase and prolong its effect in striatal dopaminergic neurotransmission in Parkinson's disease patients. While selegiline/rasagiline and tolcapone/entacapone have been available on the market for more than one decade, safinamide and opicapone have been approved in 2015 and 2016, respectively. Meanwhile, comprehensive data from several post-authorization studies have described the use and specific characteristics of the individual substances in clinical practice under real-life conditions. Here, we summarize current knowledge on both medication classes, with a focus on the added clinical value in Parkinson's disease. Furthermore, we outline practical considerations in the treatment of motor fluctuations and provide an outlook on ongoing studies with MAO-B and COMT inhibitors.

Effective Management of "OFF" Episodes in Parkinson's Disease: Emerging Treatment Strategies and Unmet Clinical Needs

Motor complications related to the chronic administration of levodopa and failure to prevent the neurodegenerative disease process counterbalance the pivotal discovery of levodopa as the cornerstone of PD treatment. Excellent motor control is offered early during the course of treatment, but this diminishes as pathological changes in the striatum lead to synaptic dopamine levels becoming completely dependent on exogenous dopamine. This non-physiologic stimulation of dopamine receptors eventually manifests as OFF episodes. As no disease modifying therapy exists for PD that can disrupt these pathological changes, most research and treatment focuses on optimization of dopaminergic stimulation of striatal receptors so that they mimic tonic, physiologic stimulation as closely as possible. Strategies focusing on these challenges have included non-pharmacologic approaches, optimizing levodopa pharmacokinetics, using adjunctive treatments including those with non-dopaminergic mechanisms, and implementing rescue therapies. Device aided therapies, including surgery, are also available. In this review, we will focus on effective management of motor symptoms related to OFF periods, including emerging strategies. Unmet clinical needs will be discussed, including non-motor symptoms, targeted molecular therapies and disease modifying therapy.

Optimizing levodopa therapy, when and how? Perspectives on the importance of delivery and the potential for an early combination approach

INTRODUCTION

There is currently a resurgence of levodopa as the initial treatment of choice for most patients with Parkinson's disease, albeit at lower doses than previously used. The addition of adjuvant treatments (including MAO-B inhibitors, COMT inhibitors and dopamine agonists) is an established strategy to reduce motor complications that develop with sustained levodopa therapy.

AREAS COVERED

In this narrative review, the authors discuss the evidence underpinning current levodopa optimization strategies, during early disease and once motor complications occur. To support the discussion, the authors performed a broad PubMed search with the terms 'levodopa/L-dopa/L-Dopa, and Parkinson's disease,' restricted to clinical trials. There is now a wealth of evidence that improving levodopa delivery to the brain improves outcomes and we discuss how agents can be combined earlier in the course of disease to leverage the full potential of this strategy.

EXPERT OPINION

Levodopa remains the cornerstone of antiparkinsonian therapy. Several promising advances in formulation have been made and include novel extended-release oral drugs as well as non-oral delivery systems. However, evidence has long suggested that anti-parkinsonian medications may be better used in combination earlier in the disease, and consequently patients will benefit from low doses of several agents rather than ever larger levodopa doses.

Effects of One-Day Application of Levodopa/Carbidopa/Entacapone versus Levodopa/Carbidopa/Opicapone in Parkinson’s Disease Patients

The catechol-O-methyltransferase inhibitors entacapone and opicapone prolong the efficacy of conventional oral levodopa/dopa decarboxylase inhibitor formulations through an increase in levodopa plasma bioavailability. Catechol-O-methyltransferase inhibitors influence the homocysteine metabolism associated with levodopa/dopa decarboxylase application. The objectives of this study were to compare the impact of additional single-day entacapone or opicapone intake on the pharmacokinetic plasma behaviour of levodopa, 3-O-methyldopa and total homocysteine in 15 Parkinson’s disease patients, with concomitant scoring of motor symptoms, under standardized conditions. The patients received opicapone plus two doses of 100 mg levodopa/carbidopa and, one week later, two doses of levodopa/carbidopa/entacapone or vice versa. Levodopa, 3-O-methyldopa and total homocysteine were determined with reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography. Levodopa bioavailability and its maximum concentration were higher with opicapone. The computed peak-to-trough difference was lower after the second levodopa administration with entacapone. The fluctuation index of levodopa did not differ between both conditions. 3-O-methyldopa decreased on both days. Homocysteine levels did not significantly vary between both conditions. A significant homocysteine decrease occurred with entacapone, but not with opicapone. Motor behaviour improved with entacapone, but not with opicapone. Opicapone baseline scores were significantly better, and thus the potential for the improvement in motor symptoms was lower compared with the entacapone condition. The higher levodopa bioavailability with opicapone suggests that it is more efficacious than entacapone for the amelioration of “off” phenomena in fluctuating patients when co-administered with a levodopa/dopa decarboxylase inhibitor regimen. Both compounds prevented an increase in homocysteine, which is a metabolic marker for an impaired capacity in the performance of methylation processes.

COMT Inhibitors in the Management of Parkinson's Disease

Levodopa treatment remains the gold standard for Parkinson's disease, but shortcomings related to the pharmacological profile, notably, oral administration and the consequent occurrence of motor complications, have led to the development of several add-on levodopa treatments or to research to improve the method of delivery. Motor fluctuations, and to a lesser extent non-motor fluctuations, concern half of the patients with Parkinson's disease after 5 years of disease and patients identified them as one of their most bothersome symptoms. Catechol-O-methyl transferase inhibitors (COMT-Is) are one of the recommended first-line levodopa add-on therapies for the amelioration of end-of dose motor fluctuations in patient with advanced Parkinson's disease. Currently, two peripheral COMT-Is are considered as first-line choices - entacapone (ENT), which was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in 1999 and the European Committee in 1998; and opicapone (OPC), which was approved by the European Committee in 2016. A second-line COMT-I that requires regular hepatic monitoring, tolcapone (TOL), was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 1998 and the European Committee in 1997. Of note, OPC also received Food and Drug Administration approval in 2021, but it is still only marketed in a few countries, including Germany, UK, Spain, Portugal, Italy, Japan, and USA, while ENT and TOL have a wider market. Our narrative review summarizes the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic properties, clinical efficacy in terms of motor fluctuations, motor/non-motor symptoms, quality of life, and safety data of these three COMT-Is, as evidenced by randomized clinical trials, as well as by real-life observational studies. Overall, a phase III non-inferiority trial showed a similar effect between ENT and OPC on off-time (-60.8 min/day and -40.3 min/day, vs placebo, respectively), with a possible additional off-time reduction of 39 min/day, obtained when there is a switch from ENT to OPC. Concomitantly, TOL can reduce off-time by an average of 98 min/day. A significant though discrete concomitant reduction on the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale motor section (2-3 points) is obtained with all three drugs vs placebo. Data on quality of life are fewer and more heterogeneous, with positive results obtained especially in open-label studies. Effects on non-motor symptoms were investigated as secondary outcome only in a few studies, frequently by means of non-specific scales and a benefit was observed in open-label studies. Dopaminergic adverse effects were the most frequent, dyskinesia being the most common for the three drugs eventually requiring levodopa dose reductions. No urine discoloration and a very low incidence of diarrhea were found with OPC compared with ENT and TOL. Regular hepatic monitoring is needed only for TOL. A combination of COMT-Is with new formulations of levodopa, including the subcutaneous, intrajejunal, or new extended-release formulation, merits further exploration to improve the management of both mild and severe motor fluctuations.

Different Catechol-O-Methyl Transferase Inhibitors in Parkinson's Disease: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a common, chronic, progressive, debilitating neurodegenerative disease. The current levodopa treatment requires the addition of other drugs, such as catechol-O-methyl transferase (COMT) inhibitors, to alleviate motor fluctuations in advanced PD. Therefore, a theoretical reference for treatment is urgently needed. In this study, an appropriate search strategy was used to screen eligible studies on different drugs to treat patients with PD from the Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane Library. The publication dates were from January 1990 to June 2021. We integrated eligible randomized controlled trials, and statistical analysis was performed on three kinds of effectiveness outcomes and two types of safety outcomes. We assessed the average difference or odds ratio between each drug and placebo and summarized them as the average and 95% confidence interval (CI), respectively. In terms of efficacy, entacapone (mean difference [MD], 0.64 h; 95% CI, 0.29–1.0), opicapone (MD, 0.92 h; 95% CI, 0.35–1.5), and tolcapone (MD, 3.2 h; 95% CI, 2.1–4.2) increased patients' total ON-time compared to placebo. Tolcapone (MD, −100 mg; 95% CI −160 to −45) reduced the total daily dose of levodopa therapy. None of these three drugs was found to have statistical significance in mean change from baseline in UPDRS part III scores when compared with others. In terms of safety, tolcapone (MD, 3.8; 95% CI, 2.1–6.8), opicapone (MD, 3.7; 95% CI, 2–7.2), and entacapone (MD, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.5–3.3) increased the number of cases of dyskinesia compared to placebo. Entacapone (MD, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.3–2.2) and tolcapone (MD, 4.3; 95% CI, 1.3–15) were more likely to cause adverse events than placebo. In conclusion, opicapone showed higher efficiency and fewer safety problems in five indicators we selected when compared with the other two drugs.

Redefining the strategy for the use of COMT inhibitors in Parkinson's disease: the role of opicapone

INTRODUCTION

Levodopa remains the gold-standard Parkinson's disease (PD) treatment, but the inevitable development of motor complications has led to intense activity in pursuit of its optimal delivery.

AREAS COVERED

Peripheral inhibition of dopa-decarboxylase has long been considered an essential component of levodopa treatment at every stage of illness. In contrast, only relatively recently have catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) inhibitors been utilized to block the other major pathway of degradation and optimize levodopa delivery to the brain. First and second-generation COMT inhibitors were deficient because of toxicity, sub-optimal pharmacokinetics or a short duration of effect. As such, they have only been employed once 'wearing-off' has developed. However, the third-generation COMT inhibitor, opicapone has overcome these difficulties and exhibits long-lasting enzyme inhibition without the toxicity observed with previous generations of COMT inhibitors. In clinical trials and real-world PD studies opicapone improves the levodopa plasma profile and results in a significant improvement in ON time in 'fluctuating' disease, but it has not yet been included in the algorithm for early treatment.

EXPERT OPINION

This review argues for a shift in the positioning of COMT inhibition with opicapone in the PD algorithm and lays out a pathway for proving its effectiveness in early disease.

Implications of dopaminergic medication withdrawal in Parkinson's disease

The trajectory of the use of dopamine replacement therapy (DRT) in Parkinson's disease (PD) is variable and doses may need to be increased, but also tapered. The plan for dose adjustment is usually done as per drug information recommendations from the licensing bodies, but there are no clear guidelines with regards to the best practice regarding the tapering off schedule given sudden dose reductions of drugs such as dopamine agonists may have serious adverse consequences. A systematic literature search was, therefore, performed to derive recommendations and the data show that there are no controlled studies or evidence-based recommendations how to taper or discontinue PD medication in a systematic manner. Most of the data were available on the dopamine agonist withdrawal syndrome (DAWS) and we found only two instructions on how to reduce pramipexole and rotigotine published by the EMA. We suggest that based on the available data, levodopa, dopamine agonists (DA), and amantadine should not be discontinued abruptly. Abrupt or sudden reduction of DA or amantadine in particular can lead to severe life-threatening withdrawal symptoms. Tapering off levodopa, COMT inhibitors, and MAO-B inhibitors may worsen motor and non-motor symptoms. Based on our clinical experience, we have proposed how to reduce PD medication and this work will form the basis of a future Delphi panel to define the recommendations in a consensus.

Parkinson's Disease: A Review from Pathophysiology to Treatment

Parkinson's Disease (PD) is the second most common neurodegenerative disease in the elderly population, with a higher prevalence in men, independent of race and social class; it affects approximately 1.5 to 2.0% of the elderly population over 60 years and 4% for those over 80 years of age. PD is caused by the necrosis of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra, which is the brain region responsible for the synthesis of the neurotransmitter dopamine (DA), resulting in its decrease in the synaptic cleft. The monoamine oxidase B (MAO-B) degrades dopamine, promoting the glutamate accumulation and oxidative stress with the release of free radicals, causing excitotoxicity. The PD symptoms are progressive physical limitations such as rigidity, bradykinesia, tremor, postural instability and disability in functional performance. Considering that there are no laboratory tests, biomarkers or imaging studies to confirm the disease, the diagnosis of PD is made by analyzing the motor features. There is no cure for PD, and the pharmacological treatment consists of a dopaminergic supplement with levodopa, COMT inhibitors, anticholinergics agents, dopaminergic agonists, and inhibitors of MAO-B, which basically aims to control the symptoms, enabling better functional mobility and increasing life expectancy of the treated PD patients. Due to the importance and increasing prevalence of PD in the world, this study reviews information on the pathophysiology, symptomatology as well as the most current and relevant treatments of PD patients.

Therapeutic Strategies to Treat or Prevent Off Episodes in Adults with Parkinson's Disease

Parkinson's disease is a chronic, neurodegenerative disease, which manifests with a mixture of motor, cognitive and behavioural symptoms. Levodopa is the most effective antiparkinsonian treatment to date, although chronic use engenders a mixture of complications in a substantial proportion of patients. Amongst these is the occurrence of episodes of worsening symptoms-'off' phenomena. These episodes can manifest with either motor or non-motor symptoms or a combination of these features and have been found to have profound impacts on patients' quality of life. Although preventative measures are poorly evidenced, avoiding excessive total daily levodopa intake in selected populations that are deemed to be of a higher risk for developing these episodes warrants further exploration. Methods to improve levodopa bioavailability and delivery to the brain are currently available and are of value in addressing these episodes once they have become established. These include modifications to levodopa formulations as well as the use of complimentary agents that improve levodopa bioavailability. The deployment of device-assisted approaches is a further dimension that can be considered in addressing these debilitating episodes. This review summarises the clinical manifestations of 'off' phenomena and the current approaches to treat them. Although we briefly discuss clinical advances on the horizon, the predominant focus is on existing, established treatments.

Contemporary Options for the Management of Motor Complications in Parkinson's Disease: Updated Clinical Review

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a chronic, progressive condition affecting around 1% of the population older than 60 years. Upon long-term treatment with levodopa, the mainstay of treatment in PD, most patients, especially younger ones exposed to higher doses, will experience symptoms related to end-of-dose deterioration, peak-dose dyskinesias, and other motor fluctuations. Therapeutic strategies are grounded on modification of oral levodopa pharmacokinetics to extend levodopa benefit and development of new routes of drug delivery (e.g., levodopa/carbidopa intestinal gel infusion) or long-acting formulations of existing dopaminergic drugs to prolong the duration of striatal dopamine receptors stimulation. As our understanding of the pathophysiology of motor complications evolves, our therapeutic armamentarium is actively expanding and the focus of research is now actively pointing to the new non-dopaminergic agents acting both within the basal ganglia and in other brain regions (e.g., drugs acting on glutamate, GABA, serotonin, and calcium channels). Despite the fact that trials comparing the different therapeutic strategies are lacking, we aimed at devising practical evidence- and experience-guided suggestions for the clinical management of motor complications, emphasizing that this should always be an individualized endeavor. This review summarizes the pharmacological management of motor complications in PD, including new formulations and routes of delivery, and the newer released drugs such as istradefylline, opicapone, safinamide, and zonisamide. Advanced therapeutic strategies for selected cases such as treatment with apomorphine and surgical techniques (deep brain stimulation) are also discussed. A comprehensive knowledge of the available options and evidence is fundamental for the successful management of these challenging complications.

Are There Benefits in Adding Catechol-O Methyltransferase Inhibitors in the Pharmacotherapy of Parkinson's Disease Patients? A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

A qualified consensus suggests that a combination of levodopa with a peripherally acting dopa decarboxylase inhibitor continues to present the gold standard treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD). However, as the disease progresses the therapeutic window of levodopa becomes narrowed. Pharmacological strategies for motor fluctuations are focused on providing less pulsatile and more continuous dopaminergic stimulation. Peripheral catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) inhibition improves the bioavailability of levodopa and results in a prolonged response.

OBJECTIVE

The primary aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of the two available COMT inhibitors; entacapone and tolcapone and the recently introduced opicapone.

METHODS

Electronic databases were systematically searched for original studies published within the last 37 years. In addition, lists of identified studies, reviews and their references were examined.

RESULTS

Twelve studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. 3701 patients with PD were included in this systematic review.

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant treatment of PD patients experiencing motor fluctuations with entacapone resulted in improvement of motor function and was well tolerated. Therefore, entacapone presented an acceptable benefit to risk ratio. Tolcapone appeared to result in a greater therapeutic effect. However, this was not consistent across all motor variables and studies, and thus would not support its use, given the current onerous monitoring that is required. Opicapone was not associated with adverse reactions in a phase III trial but did not present a greater efficacy than entacapone, and thus further studies are required in order to illustrate its cost effectiveness.

Parkinson's disease in the Western Pacific Region

1·8 billion people of diverse ethnicities and cultures live in the Western Pacific Region. The increasing longevity of populations in this region is a major contributor to the exponential increase in Parkinson's disease prevalence worldwide. Differences exist between Parkinson's disease in the Western Pacific Region and in Europe and North America that might provide important insights into our understanding of the disease and approaches to management. For example, some genetic factors (such as LRRK2 mutations or variants) differ, environmental exposures might play differential roles in modulating the risk of Parkinson's disease, and fewer dyskinesias are reported, with some differences in the profile of non-motor symptoms and comorbidities. Gaps in awareness of the disease and inequitable access to treatments pose challenges. Further improvements in infrastructure, clinical governance, and services, and concerted collaborative efforts in training and research, including greater representation of the Western Pacific Region in clinical trials, will improve care of patients with Parkinson's disease in this region and beyond.

Nitro-Group-Containing Drugs

The nitro group is considered to be a versatile and unique functional group in medicinal chemistry. Despite a long history of use in therapeutics, the nitro group has toxicity issues and is often categorized as a structural alert or a toxicophore, and evidence related to drugs containing nitro groups is rather contradictory. In general, drugs containing nitro groups have been extensively associated with mutagenicity and genotoxicity. In this context, efforts toward the structure-mutagenicity or structure-genotoxicity relationships have been undertaken. The current Perspective covers various aspects of agents that contain nitro groups, their bioreductive activation mechanisms, their toxicities, and approaches to combat their toxicity issues. In addition, recent advances in the field of anticancer, antitubercular and antiparasitic agents containing nitro groups, along with a patent survey on hypoxia-activated prodrugs containing nitro groups, are also covered.

Levodopa/carbidopa/entacapone versus levodopa/dopa-decarboxyiase inhibitor for the treatment of Parkinson's disease: systematic review, meta-analysis, and economic evaluation

Aims

To review the evidence for efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of levodopa/carbidopa/entacapone (LCE) compared with levodopa/dopa-decarboxyiase inhibitor (DDCI) for Parkinson’s disease (PD).

Methods

PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Chinese databases WangFang Data, Chinese Sci-tech Journals Database and China National Knowledge Infrastructure, as well as ClinicalTrials.gov, were searched for randomized controlled trials with “levodopa/carbidopa/entacapone” as keywords. The search period was from inception to August 2017. We conducted meta-analyses to synthesize the evidence quantitatively.

Results

A total of 5,693 records were obtained. We included seven randomized controlled trials and one cost-effectiveness study after the screening process. Compared with levodopa–DDCI, LCE improved patient Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) II score (mean difference [MD] −1.17, 95% CI −1.64 to −0.71), UPDRS III score (MD −1.55, 95% CI −2.29 to −0.81), and Schwab and England daily activity rating (MD 2.05, 95% CI 0.85–3.26). There was no statistically significant difference in the risk of serious adverse events (AEs) or discontinuation due to AEs in patients with LCE, and the risk of total AEs was higher in the LCE group (risk ratio [RR] 1.33, 95% CI 1.05–1.70). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of LCE was £3,105 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained in the UK.

Conclusion

LCE can improve PD patients’ motor symptoms and daily living functioning when compared with levodopa/DDCI.

Adverse effects produced by different drugs used in the treatment of Parkinson's disease: A mixed treatment comparison

OBJECTIVE

This mixed treatment comparison is used to compare the adverse effects of eleven different drugs used to treat Parkinson's disease (PD). The drugs that we compare include the following: ropinirole, rasagiline, rotigotine, entacapone, apomorphine, pramipexole, sumanirole, bromocriptine, piribedil, pergolide, and levodopa.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were searched from the inception to December 2015. Our analysis combines the evidences of direct comparison and indirect comparison between various literatures. We evaluated the merging odds ratios (OR) value and surface under the cumulative ranking curves (SUCRA) of each of the drugs and used this as a mode of comparison.

RESULTS

Twenty-four randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included in this study. Our results demonstrated that the incidence of adverse reactions of ropinirole, rotigotine, entacapone, and sumanirole were obviously higher in terms of nausea compared to the placebo. Ropinirole produced the highest incidence rates of dyskinesia side effects, whereas pramipexole was significantly higher in terms of patients' hallucination. In addition, the SUCRA values of all the drugs showed that the incidence of adverse reaction of pergolide was relatively high (nausea: 83.5%; hallucination: 79.8%); for dyskinesia and somnolence, the incidence of ropinirole was higher (dyskinesia: 80.5%; somnolence: 69.4%); the incidence of adverse reaction of piribedil was higher on PD in terms of dizziness (67.0%); and the incidence of bromocriptine was relatively high in terms of constipation (62.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

This mixed treatment comparison showed that the drugs ropinirole, bromocriptine, and piribedil produced the highest incidence rates of nausea, dyskinesia, hallucination, dizziness, constipation, and somnolence symptoms. Thus, we conclude that as these three drugs produced the most frequent symptoms, they are not recommended for the treatment of patients with Parkinson's disease.

Efficacy and Safety of Adjuvant Treatment with Entacapone in Advanced Parkinson's Disease with Motor Fluctuation: A Systematic Meta-Analysis

AIMS

To assess the efficacy and safety of adjuvant treatment with entacapone in the treatment of later Parkinson's disease (PD) patients with motor fluctuation.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of relevant studies from 8 databases to June 23, 2016.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies were included in this review (n = 2,804). The results showed that compared with placebo, adjuvant therapy with entacapone significantly increased on time (p < 0.01) and reduced off time (p < 0.01), the required levodopa (LD) dose (p < 0.01) and improved Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) scores (activities of daily living score: p < 0.01; motor score: p < 0.01; UPDRS I-III score: p > 0.05). However, the withdrawal (OR 1.44, 95% CI 1.10-1.89, p < 0.01) due to adverse events and adverse events rates including nausea (OR 2.23, 95% CI 1.56-3.20, p < 0.01), urine discoloration (OR 14.99, 95% CI 7.63-29.44, p < 0.01), gastrointestinal disorder (OR 2.6, 95% CI 1.89-3.57, p < 0.01) and dyskinesia (OR 2.00, 95% CI 1.56-2.58, p < 0.01) increased in patients with entacapone compared with those given a placebo .

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis suggests that the entacapone used as adjuvant therapy to LD is effective in the management of later PD with fluctuation. However, patients on entacapone had a higher frequency of adverse events than those on placebo but no occurrence of severe adverse reactions.

Cost-Utility Model of Rasagiline in the Treatment of Advanced Parkinson's Disease in Finland

Background:

The economic burden of Parkinson's disease (PD) is high, especially in patients experiencing motor fluctuations. Rasagiline has demonstrated efficacy against symptoms of PD in early and advanced stages of the disease.

Objective:

To assess the cost-utility of rasagiline and entacapone as adjunctive therapies to levodopa versus standard levodopa care in PD patients with motor fluctuations in Finland.

Methods:

A 2 year probabilistic Markov model with 3 health states: “25% or less off-time/day,” “greater than 25% off-time/day,” and “dead” was used. Off-time represents time awake with poor or absent motor function. Model inputs included transition probabilities from randomized clinical trials, utilities from a preference measurement study, and costs and resources from a Finnish cost-of-illness study. Effectiveness measures were quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and number of months spent with 25% or less off-time/day. Uncertainty around parameters was taken into account by Monte Carlo simulations.

Results:

Over 2 years from a societal perspective, rasagiline or entacapone as adjunctive therapies to levodopa showed greater effectiveness than levodopa alone at no additional costs. Benefits after 2 years were 0.13 (95% CI 0.08 to 0.17) additional QALYs and 5.2 (3.6 to 6.7) additional months for rasagiline and 0.12 (0.08 to 0.17) QALYs and 5.1 (3.5 to 6.6) months for entacapone, both in adjunct to levodopa compared with levodopa alone.

Conclusions:

The results of this study support the use of rasagiline and entacapone as adjunctive cost-effective alternatives to levodopa alone in PD patients with motor fluctuations in Finland. With a different mode of action, rasagiline is a valuable therapeutic alternative to entacapone at no additional charge to society.

Initial treatment of Parkinson's disease in 2016: The 2000 consensus conference revisited

In 2000, a French consensus conference proposed guidelines for the treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD). Since then, new drugs have been concocted, new studies have been published and clinicians have become aware of some drug-induced adverse effects that were little known in the past. This has led us to reconsider the recommendations published 16 years ago. Thus, the aim of the present review is to present the recent data related to the different medications and non-pharmacological approaches available for PD, with a special focus on early-stage PD. Levodopa (LD), dopamine agonists (DAs), catechol-O-methyltransferase inhibitors (COMT-Is), anticholinergics, monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOB-Is) and amantadine have been considered, and their efficacy and safety for both motor as well as non-motor aspects are reported here. This has led to our proposal for a revised therapeutic strategy for the initiation of treatment in newly diagnosed PD patients, based on the available literature and the relative benefits/side effects balance.

Movement Disorders: A Brief Guide in Medication Management

Movement disorders can be challenging to manage and often use a specific set of medications. Because it is a complex and broad field within neurology, many providers are unfamiliar with the classes of medications. This paper details medications used for specific conditions, explains why these medications are helpful, and shares pearls and pitfalls related to each agent, focusing on parameters such as dose titration, side effect profiles, and specific drug-drug interactions and challenges. We focus on the most commonly encountered movement disorders, including essential tremor, Parkinson's disease, rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder, and restless leg syndrome.

A review of current and novel levodopa formulations for the treatment of Parkinson's disease

Parkinson's disease treatment is characterized by the nearly inevitable development of motor complications, including fluctuations and dyskinesias, in which the duration of benefit of a dose of medication is offset by involuntary movements that can be more disabling than the Parkinsonian features themselves. While levodopa remains the gold standard of therapy, it is the most likely to be associated with these complications. The concept of continuous dopaminergic stimulation has gained increasing acceptance as a potential mechanism by which to avoid or delay the development of motor complications, or to minimize their impact once they have already occurred. This article will explore existing and novel formulations of levodopa to identify their role in the spectrum of Parkinson's disease therapeutics.

Interventions for fatigue in Parkinson's disease

BACKGROUND

Factors contributing to subjective fatigue in people with idiopathic Parkinson's disease (PD) are not well known. This makes it difficult to manage fatigue effectively in PD.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effects of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions, compared to an inactive control intervention, on subjective fatigue in people with PD.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library); MEDLINE (via PubMed); Ovid EMBASE; EBSCO CINAHL; Ovid PsycINFO; PEDro; and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform Search Portal up to April 2015. References of included studies and identified review articles were screened for additional studies. There were no restrictions based on language, date of publication or study setting.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that report on subjective fatigue in people with PD.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently performed study selection, data collection and risk of bias assessments.

MAIN RESULTS

Eleven studies were eligible for this systematic review, with a total of 1817 people. Three studies included only people who experienced clinically relevant fatigue (Fatigue Severity Scale score ≥ 4 out of 7 or Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory total score > 48 out of 100), whereas all other studies did not select participants on the basis of experienced fatigue. Nine studies investigated the effects of medication (i.e. levodopa-carbidopa, memantine, rasagiline, caffeine, methylphenidate, modafinil or doxepin) on subjective fatigue. All studies were placebo controlled. There was insufficient evidence to determine the effect of doxepin on the impact of fatigue on activities in daily life (ADL) or fatigue severity (one study, N = 12, standardised mean difference (SMD) = -1.50, 95% confidence interval (CI) -2.84 to -0.15; low quality evidence). We found high quality evidence that rasagiline reduced or slowed down the progression of physical aspects of fatigue (one study, N = 1176, SMD = -0.27, 95% CI -0.39 to -0.16, I(2) = 0%). None of the other pharmacological interventions affected subjective fatigue in PD. With regard to adverse effects, only levodopa-carbidopa showed an increase for the risk of nausea (one study, N = 361, risk ratio (RR) = 1.85, 95% CI 1.05 to 3.27; high quality evidence). Two studies investigated the effect of exercise on fatigue compared with usual care. We found low quality evidence for the effect of exercise on reducing the impact of fatigue on ADL or fatigue severity (two studies, N = 57, SMD = -0.45, 95% CI -1.21 to 0.32, I(2) = 44%).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Based on the current evidence, no clear recommendations for the treatment of subjective fatigue in PD can be provided. Doxepin may reduce the impact of fatigue on ADL and fatigue severity; however, this finding has to be confirmed in high quality studies. Rasagiline may be effective in reducing levels of physical fatigue in PD. No evidence was found for the effectiveness of levodopa-carbidopa, memantine, caffeine, methylphenidate, modafinil or exercise. Studies are needed to investigate the effect of exercise intensity on exercise capacity and subjective fatigue. Future studies should focus on interventions that address the maladaptive behavioural or cognitive aspects of fatigue in people with PD. Characteristics, such as severity and nature of perceived fatigue and underlying mood disorders should be considered to identify responders and non-responders when studying interventions for fatigue. The development of a core-set of self-report fatigue questionnaires with established responsiveness and known minimal important difference values will facilitate the interpretation of change in fatigue scores.

Efficacy and safety of entacapone in levodopa/carbidopa versus levodopa/benserazide treated Parkinson's disease patients with wearing-off

Entacapone is frequently used together with levodopa/carbidopa (LC) and levodopa/benserazide (LB) in the treatment of Parkinson’s disease (PD) patients with wearing-off symptoms. It is generally assumed that the effects of entacapone are independent of the type of decarboxylase inhibitor used, but there is very little published data available on the efficacy of entacapone administered with LB versus LC. We have performed a pooled analysis of three randomized, double-blind, 6-month, phase III studies to compare the treatment effects of entacapone (compared to placebo) in PD patients receiving LC or LB. A total of 551 PD patients experiencing wearing-off were included in the analysis. 300 patients were on LB and 251 on LC at baseline. At 6 months, entacapone (compared to placebo) improved mean daily OFF-time in patients on LB and LC by 0.76 (p = 0.016) and 0.95 (p = 0.011) hours, respectively. The corresponding improvements in ON-time were 0.97 (p = 0.002) and 0.83 h (p = 0.022), respectively. The treatment effects of entacapone both in LB and LC users were statistically significant (p < 0.05) also in UPDRS II and III scores, except in UPDRS II scores in patients receiving LC (p = 0.20). None of the treatment effects of entacapone were statistically significantly different between patients receiving LB or LC. Reported adverse events were comparable between LB and LC users. We conclude that entacapone provided comparable benefits in PD patients with wearing-off symptoms using either LB or LC.

Progress in Clinical Neurosciences: A Forum on the Early Management of Parkinson's Disease

There are numerous concerns related to treatment choices involving early dopaminergic therapy in Parkinson's disease. These include the effect on the underlying progression of the neurodegenerative process as well as the development of motor complications such as fluctuations and dyskinesias. A number of recent basic and clinical studies have provided new insights but have also added confusion and controversy. This report summarizes presentations and discussion dealing with these issues from a one-day symposium involving Canadian Movement Disorders neurologists.

Pharmacological strategies for the management of levodopa-induced dyskinesia in patients with Parkinson's disease

L-Dopa-induced dyskinesias (LID) are the most common adverse effects of long-term dopaminergic therapy in Parkinson's disease (PD). However, the exact mechanisms underlying dyskinesia are still unclear. For a long time, nigrostriatal degeneration and pulsatile stimulation of striatal postsynaptic receptors have been highlighted as the key factors for the development of LID. In recent years, PD models have revealed a wide range of non-dopaminergic neurotransmitter systems involved in pre- and postsynaptic changes and thereby contributing to the pathophysiology of LID. In the current review, we focus on therapeutic LID targets, mainly based on agents acting on dopaminergic, glutamatergic, serotoninergic, adrenergic, and cholinergic systems. Despite a large number of clinical trials, currently only amantadine and, to a lesser extent, clozapine are being used as effective strategies in the treatment of LID in clinical settings. Thus, in the second part of the article, we review the placebo-controlled trials on LID treatment in order to disentangle the changing scenario of drug development. Promising results include the extension of L-dopa action without inducing LID of the novel monoamine oxidase B- and glutamate-release inhibitor safinamide; however, this had no obvious effect on existing LID. Others, like the metabotropic glutamate-receptor antagonist AFQ056, showed promising results in some of the studies; however, confirmation is still lacking. Thus, to date, strategies of continuous dopaminergic stimulation seem the most promising to prevent or ameliorate LID. The success of future therapeutic strategies once moderate to severe LID occur will depend on the translation from preclinical experimental models into clinical practice in a bidirectional process.

Improving L-dopa therapy: the development of enzyme inhibitors

The introduction of levodopa produced a monumental change in the treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD). Limitations in its bioavailability and tolerability led to the search for drugs that could improve its pharmacokinetics and safety profile. Dopa-decarboxylase inhibitors were the first such drugs that were developed, and their use in combination with L-dopa has become standard practice. Increasing knowledge on the metabolism of L-dopa allowed the identification of additional targets for intervention in an attempt to improve the symptomatic efficacy of L-dopa. Monoamineoxidase inhibitors, enhancing the central bioavailability of dopamine by blocking its metabolism, were the next step, and despite controversies regarding their efficacy, they have remained as valuable adjuncts to l-dopa in the treatment of PD. More recently, the introduction of potent, selective catechol-O-methyl transferase inhibitors have found their place in the therapeutic armamentarium of PD and are prescribed in combination with l-dopa to prolong the duration of its action.

Pooled analysis of phase III with entacapone in Parkinson's disease

OBJECTIVES

To investigate efficacy and safety of entacapone across phase III studies in Parkinson's disease (PD) with wearing-off symptoms.

METHODS

Retrospective, pooled analysis of four phase 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies with entacapone.

RESULTS

475 of 808 patients with PD received entacapone and 333 received placebo. Entacapone improved daily OFF- and ON-times (change from baseline) by 0.8 h compared with placebo (P < 0.0001 for both variables). Entacapone was also better in UPDRS II (P < 0.01) and III (P < 0.01) scores and global evaluation (P < 0.05). Similar benefits were seen in subgroups of patients with and without dopamine agonist (DA) or selegiline, but the subgroup results should be regarded as exploratory. Entacapone was generally well tolerated. Dyskinesia and nausea were more frequently reported by patients on entacapone (25.7% and 14.5% of patients, respectively) than those receiving placebo (15.6% and 6.0%, respectively). However, there was no difference in reports of hallucinations between entacapone (4.8%) and placebo (4.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

Entacapone improved daily OFF- and ON-times by a mean of 0.8 h compared with placebo across the four pooled efficacy studies and was generally well tolerated. The results of this pooled analysis potentially serve as a useful benchmarking data for new therapies (especially levodopa products) in advanced patients with PD.

Entacapone reduces cortical activation in Parkinson's disease with wearing-off: a f-MRI study

Background and Purpose

Wearing-off is one of the most frequent problems encountered by levodopa-treated patients. Entacapone, a peripheral inhibitor of catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT), reduces this motor complication by prolonging the effect of levodopa. We sought to understand the impact of COMT-inhibition on movement execution in PD patients with wearing-off by comparing functional magnetic resonance imaging (f-MRI) activation patterns prior to and during entacapone treatment. Our hypothesis was to determine whether changes in cortical activation are associated to COMT-inhibitor treatment.

Methods

Nine levodopa-treated non-demented PD patients with wearing-off were prospectively studied in two f-MRI session, prior to and during entacapone treatment. A group of control subjects were also studied for comparison.

Results

The patients significantly improved under COMT-inhibitor treatment based on home diaries. F-MRI results showed that at baseline the patients presented a bilateral activation of the primary motor, controlateral premotor cortex and supplementary motor area, as well as ipsilateral cerebellum. During treatment with entacapone, PD patients showed reductions in the activations of these cortical areas and a decreased activation in the ipsilateral cerebellum.

Conclusions

Our preliminary findings indicate that f-MRI is able to detect cortical activation changes during long-term modulation of dopaminergic treatment in PD patients with wearing-off, and thus, this technique could be further investigated in advanced PD patients.

Summary of the recommendations of the EFNS/MDS-ES review on therapeutic management of Parkinson's disease

OBJECTIVE

To summarize the 2010 EFNS/MDS-ES evidence-based treatment recommendations for the management of Parkinson's disease (PD). This summary includes the treatment recommendations for early and late PD.

METHODS

For the 2010 publication, a literature search was undertaken for articles published up to September 2009. For this summary, an additional literature search was undertaken up to December 2010. Classification of scientific evidence and the rating of recommendations were made according to the EFNS guidance. In cases where there was insufficient scientific evidence, a consensus statement ('good practice point') is made.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

For each clinical indication, a list of therapeutic interventions is provided, including classification of evidence.

Factors determining when to start levodopa/carbidopa/entacapone treatment in Spanish patients with Parkinson's disease

INTRODUCTION

Several therapeutic options are available for the symptomatic treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD).There is no reliable information about which factors are involved in the choice of treatment.

OBJECTIVE

To identify factors contributing to the decision to start treatment with levodopa/carbidopa/entacapone (LCE) in patients with PD.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We completed a descriptive cross-sectional retrospective multicentre study of patients with idiopathic PD receiving LCE. Clinical data were collected with special attention to factors that could potentially determine when to initiate treatment with LCE in normal clinical practice.

RESULTS

We studied 1050 patients with a mean age of 71.3±8.7 years (58.2% men). Average time from onset of symptoms to diagnosis was 13.8±12.9 months, with a latency time of 74.5±53.6 months before starting LCE treatment. The most common initial symptoms were tremor (70.6%), reduced dexterity (43.2%) and slowness of movement (41.5%). At the start of LCE treatment, most patients were in Hoehn and Yahr stage 2 (57.5%), with an average rating of 73.4% on the Schwab & England scale. Eight hundred twenty two patients (78.3%) received treatment with other drugs before starting LCE (mean time between starting any PD treatment and starting LCE was 40.5±47.2 months). Clinical factors with a moderate, marked, or crucial effect on the decision to start LCE treatment were bradykinesia (84.7%), daytime rigidity (72.2%), general decline (72.2%), difficulty walking (66.4%), tremor (62.7%), nocturnal rigidity (56.1%), and postural instability (53%). Difficulty performing activities of daily living was the only psychosocial factor identified as having an influence on the decision (84.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

The decision to start patients with idiopathic PD on LCE treatment is mainly determined by motor deficits and disabilities associated with disease progression.

Drug treatment of Parkinson's disease

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a common neurodegenerative disease. While its cause remains elusive, much progress has been made regarding its treatment. Available drugs have a good symptomatic effect, but none has yet been shown to slow the progression of the disease in humans. The most efficacious drug is levodopa, but it remains unclear whether the symptomatic benefit is associated with neurotoxic effects and long-term deterioration. The long-term problem associated with levodopa is the appearance of dyskinesias, which is significantly delayed among patients treated with dopamine agonists as initial therapy. Less clear is the role of other drugs in PD, such as monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs), including selegiline and rasagiline, the putative N-meihyl-o-aspartaie (NMDA) receptor antagonists amantadine and memantine, and the muscarinic receptor blockers. All these may be used as initial therapy and delay the use of dopaminergic drugs, or can be added later to reduce specific symptoms (tremor or dyskinesias). Advanced PD is frequently associated with cognitive decline. To some extent, this can be helped by treatment with cholinesterase inhibitors such as rivastigmine. Similarly, hallucinations and delusions affect PD patients in the advanced stages of their disease. The use of classical neuroleptic drugs in these patients is contraindicated because of their extrapyramidal effects, but atypical drugs, and particularly clozapine, are very helpful. The big void in the therapy of PD lies in the more advanced stages. Several motor symptoms, like postural instability, dysphagia, and dysphonia, as well as dyskinesias, are poorly controlled by existing drugs. New therapies should also be developed against autonomic symptoms, particularly constipation.

Enhancing dopamine treatments: worth the effort?

SUMMARY Dopamine-based treatments underlie our current management of the motor symptoms of Parkinson’s disease. In this article, we look at the development of levodopa therapy, combination therapies with levodopa/dopa decarboxylase inhibitors, use of dopamine agonists, monoamine oxidase inhibitors, catechol-O-methyl transferase inhibitors and the development of nonoral delivery methods, in particular in the treatment of motor complications in later PD. There are some shortcomings of dopamine-based therapies including a limited benefit on the non-motor manifestations of Parkinson’s disease. We conclude by looking at the themes for future developments to further enhance dopamine delivery methods.

Optimizing levodopa therapy to treat wearing-off symptoms in Parkinson's disease: focus on levodopa/carbidopa/entacapone

Levodopa has been the mainstay of Parkinson's disease (PD) therapy for over 40 years, with its efficacy surpassing that of other antiparkinsonian medications. As such, most PD patients eventually require levodopa-based therapy during the course of the disease. However, despite its proven efficacy, long-term levodopa therapy is associated with motor complications, with wearing-off being the most prevalent. Wearing-off occurs, in part, as a result of the short half-life of levodopa, which leads to fluctuations in plasma levodopa levels. A pharmacokinetic profile characterized by a higher trough value of levodopa can be achieved by combining levodopa/carbidopa with entacapone, which inhibits the peripheral breakdown of levodopa, resulting in higher plasma levodopa levels. Here, we review the limitations of conventional levodopa and the clinical data for levodopa/carbidopa/entacapone in treating patients with wearing-off.

Perampanel in Parkinson disease fluctuations: a double-blind randomized trial with placebo and entacapone

OBJECTIVES

Perampanel is a selective and noncompetitive α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methylisoxazole propionic acid-type glutamate receptor antagonist that improves motor symptoms in animal models of Parkinson disease (PD). The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and tolerability of perampanel in L-dopa-treated patients with moderately severe PD and motor fluctuations using an active comparator study design.

METHODS

This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind, 3-arm, parallel-group, controlled study assessing the effects of perampanel (4 mg/d), placebo, or entacapone (200 mg with each dose of L-dopa) in 723 L-dopa-treated patients with PD with "OFF" problems. The primary outcome measure was the change from baseline in mean total daily OFF time based on diaries. Secondary end points included change from baseline in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale part II while OFF, Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale part III while "ON," and mean total daily ON time without dyskinesias or with nontroublesome dyskinesias.

RESULTS

In total, 480 patients (66.4%) completed the study, which was terminated early after negative results of 2 other large placebo-controlled studies became available. Perampanel was not superior to placebo on any efficacy end point, whereas entacapone was superior to placebo on the primary end point (P = 0.034) and most secondary outcomes. Perampanel was generally well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

Perampanel (4 mg/d) was well tolerated but did not have a clinically significant effect in improving motor symptoms of L-dopa-treated patients with moderately advanced PD and motor fluctuations. These patients did respond to the active comparator, entacapone, confirming the validity of the findings despite the early termination of the study.

Modelling the cost effectiveness of treatments for Parkinson's disease: a methodological review

The objective of this review was to assess models of cost effectiveness for Parkinson's disease (PD) published after July 2002 and to derive recommendations for future modelling. A systematic literature search was performed in the databases PubMed, Current Contents, EMBASE, EconLit, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and DARE (Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effectiveness), NHS EED (Economic Evaluation Database) and HTA (Health Technology Assessment) of the UK NHS Centre for Review and Dissemination (July 2002 to March 2010). Only fully published studies using decision trees, Markov models, individual simulation models or sets of mathematical equations were included. Most of the 11 studies identified used Markov models (n = 9) and two employed were based on decision trees. Based on the Hoehn & Yahr (HY) scale, authors evaluated the cost effectiveness of drug treatments (n = 6), surgical approaches such as deep brain stimulation (n = 1) or striatal cell grafting (n = 1), and diagnostic procedures such as single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) testing (n = 3) over a time horizon of 1 year to lifetime. Costs were adapted to address a societal and/or healthcare provider/third-party payer perspective. All but one of the interventions investigated were considered cost effective or cost saving. Cost-effectiveness modelling in PD between 2003 and 2010 showed only minor improvement when compared with our earlier review of models published from 1998 up to 2003. Cost-effectiveness modelling recommendations were complied with to only a limited extent, leaving room for quality improvement. More advanced modelling approaches may, so far, be under-represented, but may be used in the future, driven by the research question. Adverse events of treatment, co-morbidities or disease complications are not yet sufficiently included in the models to adequately represent clinical reality.

Strategies for Parkinson’s disease care: prevention and management of motor fluctuations

SUMMARY Parkinson’s disease (PD) is characterized clinically by the hallmark motor signs of bradykinesia, rest tremor and rigidity. Current pharmacological management goals include control of motor symptoms as well as prevention and management of motor complications including motor fluctuations and dyskinesias. While the use of levodopa revolutionized the pharmacological management of PD, multiple other agents and strategies have emerged with many demonstrable, albeit sometimes controversial, advantages to a ‘levodopa’ only approach. Despite these developments, the progressive nature of PD requires vigilance and creativity from clinicians as both motor and nonmotor complications grow in number and severity over time.