Cost-utility analysis of levodopa carbidopa intestinal gel (Duodopa) in the treatment of advanced Parkinson's disease in patients in Scotland and Wales

AIMS

To carry out a cost-utility analysis comparing the cost-effectiveness of levodopa carbidopa intestinal gel (LCIG) with standard of care (SOC) in patients with advanced Parkinson's Disease (aPD) unsuitable for apomorphine or deep brain stimulation (DBS). LCIG is the only treatment option in this small, but clinically important, population.

METHODS

A Markov model with 25 disease states based on disease stage and off-time status plus death. Patients enter the model with aPD spending >50% of their waking day in the off-state. Patients progress through the model in 6-monthly cycles for 20 years to approximate lifetime treatment and capture long-term costs and effects of therapy. Inputs are based on LCIG clinical trials for clinical outcomes and health state utilities, the literature for health state transitions and use UK-based input data wherever possible (drug costs, disease/adverse event management costs, discontinuation rates, mortality rates).

LIMITATIONS

Data collection can be challenging in this small, elderly population with advanced disease, therefore some model inputs were estimated, rather than collected directly. It was assumed that a reduction in off-time was the only benefit after the first year of treatment with LCIG; this is a conservative approach, since there may be additional clinical benefits.

RESULTS

There is a considerable incremental gain in quality adjusted life years (QALYs) for patients treated with LCIG of 1.26 QALY with an associated incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of £52,110. If the impact on caregivers is included, the ICER reduces to £47,266.

CONCLUSIONS

In cases where there is an orphan population, with no alternative treatment options, HTA assessments have a broader decision-making framework and the ICER is interpreted in this context. In the setting of a very small population, with considerable unmet need, LCIG represents value for money, as reflected by funding approval across the UK.

The cost-effectiveness of levodopa/carbidopa intestinal gel compared to standard care in advanced Parkinson's disease

BACKGROUND

Parkinson's disease (PD) is an incurable, progressive neurological condition, with symptoms impacting movement, walking, and posture that eventually become severely disabling. Advanced PD (aPD) has a significant impact on quality-of-life (QoL) for patients and their caregivers/families. Levodopa/carbidopa intestinal gel (LCIG) is indicated for the treatment of advanced levodopa-responsive PD with severe motor fluctuations and hyper-/dyskinesia when available combinations of therapy have not given satisfactory results.

AIMS

To determine the cost-effectiveness of LCIG vs standard of care (SoC) for the treatment of aPD patients.

METHODS

A Markov model was used to evaluate LCIG vs SoC in a hypothetical cohort of 100 aPD patients with severe motor fluctuations from an Irish healthcare perspective. Model health states were defined by Hoehn & Yahr (H&Y) scale-combined with amount of time in OFF-time-and death. SoC comprised of standard oral therapy ± subcutaneous apomorphine infusion and standard follow-up visits. Clinical efficacy, utilities, and transition probabilities were derived from published studies. Resource use was estimated from individual patient-level data from Adelphi 2012 UK dataset, using Irish costs, where possible. Time horizon was 20 years. Costs and outcomes were discounted at 4%. Both one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted.

RESULTS

The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for LCIG vs SOC was €26,944/quality adjusted life year (QALY) (total costs and QALYs for LCIG vs SoC: €537,687 vs €514,037 and 4.37 vs 3.49, respectively). LCIG is cost-effective at a payer threshold of €45,000. The model was most sensitive to health state costs.

CONCLUSION

LCIG is a cost-effective treatment option compared with SoC in patients with aPD.

[Pharmacoeconomic study of the treatment of advanced Parkinson's disease]

INTRODUCTION

When oral or transdermal drug therapy in Parkinson's disease becomes less effective, there are three therapies using assisted devices that can reduce motor and non-motor complications: subcutaneous apomorphine infusion pump (SAIP), continuous levodopa/carbidopa duodenal infusion (LDI) and deep brain stimulation (DBS).

AIM

Conduct a comparative pharmacoeconomic analysis of the use of SAIP, with LDI and DBS. As a secondary objective arises discuss the profile of the ideal candidate for each of the technicals.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Information on life years gained and quality adjusted life years (QALY) according to Hoehn and Yahr scale was obtained, as well as data on costs and resource use for each of the alternatives. The perspective of the analysis was the National Health System and the time horizon was 5 years for costs and patient´s lifetime for utilities. Outcome measures used were life years gained and QALYs, and incremental cost/utility ratio for comparison.

RESULTS

Cost/utility ratio was obtained for each option: 31,956 euros/QALY for DBS, 38,249 euros/QALY for SAIP, and 75,206 euros/QALY for LDI.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results allow us to add information about effectiveness of different treatments, as these are presented in gain of years lived in full health (QALY). Data obtained contribute to decision making that determine planning and management of each case, without forgetting patient and neurologist preferences, as well as budgetary limitations.

Cost-Utility Model of Rasagiline in the Treatment of Advanced Parkinson's Disease in Finland

Background:

The economic burden of Parkinson's disease (PD) is high, especially in patients experiencing motor fluctuations. Rasagiline has demonstrated efficacy against symptoms of PD in early and advanced stages of the disease.

Objective:

To assess the cost-utility of rasagiline and entacapone as adjunctive therapies to levodopa versus standard levodopa care in PD patients with motor fluctuations in Finland.

Methods:

A 2 year probabilistic Markov model with 3 health states: “25% or less off-time/day,” “greater than 25% off-time/day,” and “dead” was used. Off-time represents time awake with poor or absent motor function. Model inputs included transition probabilities from randomized clinical trials, utilities from a preference measurement study, and costs and resources from a Finnish cost-of-illness study. Effectiveness measures were quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and number of months spent with 25% or less off-time/day. Uncertainty around parameters was taken into account by Monte Carlo simulations.

Results:

Over 2 years from a societal perspective, rasagiline or entacapone as adjunctive therapies to levodopa showed greater effectiveness than levodopa alone at no additional costs. Benefits after 2 years were 0.13 (95% CI 0.08 to 0.17) additional QALYs and 5.2 (3.6 to 6.7) additional months for rasagiline and 0.12 (0.08 to 0.17) QALYs and 5.1 (3.5 to 6.6) months for entacapone, both in adjunct to levodopa compared with levodopa alone.

Conclusions:

The results of this study support the use of rasagiline and entacapone as adjunctive cost-effective alternatives to levodopa alone in PD patients with motor fluctuations in Finland. With a different mode of action, rasagiline is a valuable therapeutic alternative to entacapone at no additional charge to society.

Pramipexole v. Levodopa as Initial Treatment for Parkinson’s Disease: A Randomized Clinical-Economic Trial

Purpose. To determine the 2-year incremental cost effectiveness of initial pramipexole treatment compared with initial levodopa treatment in patientswith early Parkinson’s disease (PD). Methods. 301 subjects with early PD were randomized to either pramipexole or levodopa and followed every 3 months over a 2-year period. Costs were assigned to patient collected health utilization data using a variety of methods. Health state preferences were estimated using the EuroQol. Results. Pramipexole strategy was an estimated $2,138 (SE = $1,182) more expensive than levodopa strategy. The incremental cost-effectiveness of pramipexole compared with levodopa was $106,900/QALY (EQ-5D), compared with pramipexole being dominated by levodopa using the EQVAS. Conclusions.Although considerable uncertainty exists in the 2-year cost-effectiveness of initial pramipexole compared with initial levodopa in the treatment of early PD, our estimates suggest that pramipexole may not be welfare enhancing during the first 2 years of treatment. If initial pramipexole results in long-term improvements in quality of life, its cost-effectiveness will become more favorable.

Cost-effectiveness of continuous subcutaneous apomorphine in the treatment of Parkinson's disease in the UK and Germany

BACKGROUND

Parkinson's disease (PD) is the second most common neurodegenerative disease, affecting ∼ 5.2 million people worldwide. Continuous subcutaneous apomorphine (CSAI) represents an alternative treatment option for advanced PD with motor fluctuation. The purpose of this analysis was to estimate the cost-effectiveness of CSAI compared with Levodopa/carbidopa intestinal gel (LCIG), Deep-Brain-Stimulation (DBS) and Standard-of-care (SOC).

METHODS

A multi-country Markov-Model to simulate the long-term consequences, disease progression (Hoehn & Yahr stages 3-5, percentage of waking-time in the OFF-state), complications, and adverse events was developed. Monte-Carlo simulation accounted for uncertainty. Probabilities were derived from RCT and open-label studies. Costs were estimated from the UK and German healthcare provider's perspective. QALYs, life-years (LYs), and costs were projected over a life-time horizon.

RESULTS

UK lifetime costs associated with CSAI amounts to £78,251.49 and generates 2.85 QALYs and 6.28 LYs (€104,500.08, 2.92 QALYs and 6.49 LYs for Germany). Costs associated with LCIG are £130,011.34, achieves 3.06 QALYs and 6.93 LYs (€175,004.43, 3.18 QALYs and 7.18 LYs for Germany). The incremental-cost per QALY gained (ICER) was £244,684.69 (€272,914.58). Costs for DBS are £87,730.22, associated with 2.75 QALYs and 6.38 LYs (€105,737.08, 2.85 QALYs and 6.61 LYs for Germany). CSAI dominates DBS. SOC associated UK costs are £76,793.49; 2.62 QALYs and 5.76 LYs were reached (€90,011.91, 2.73 QALYs and 6 LYs for Germany).

CONCLUSIONS

From a health economic perspective, CSAI is a cost-effective therapy and could be seen as an alternative treatment to LCIG or DBS for patients with advanced PD.

[Pharmacoeconomic aspects of using levodopa/carbidopa intestinal gel in Parkinson's disease]

The application of levodopa/carbidopa intestinal gel (LCIG), which provides the more reliable control of the disease and decrease in progression rates compared to standard treatment, is a variant of treatment of severe forms of Parkinson's disease. An analysis of pharmacoeconomic aspects of LCIG use in foreign countries has shown that this treatment significantly improves expectancy of patients and reduces the costs of professional care. The approximate threshold values of costs per 1 QALY recommended for reimbursement of intervention costs are £30,000 in the United Kingdom and €50,000 in Sweden. In respect to intervention, LCIG can be regarded as an acceptable drug.

Cost analysis of the treatments for patients with advanced Parkinson's disease: SCOPE study

OBJECTIVE

To perform a comparative long-term analysis of the associated healthcare costs for the therapeutic options in advanced Parkinson's Disease (PD): deep brain stimulation (DBS), continuous duodenal levodopa-carbidopa infusion (CDLCI), and continuous subcutaneous apomorphine infusion (CSAI).

METHODS

Resource use associated with the pre-treatment period, procedure, and follow-up was assessed for the three therapies from the perspective of the Spanish national healthcare system. Resources consumption was measured with a Healthcare Resources Questionnaire (at nine advanced PD centres). Unit costs (Euro-Spain 2010) were applied to measure resource use to obtain the average total cost for each therapy over 5 years.

RESULTS

Mean cumulative 5-year cost per patient was significantly lower with DBS (€88,014) vs CSAI (€141,393) and CDLCI (€233,986) (p < 0.0001). DBS was associated with the lowest cumulative costs from year 2, with a yearly average cost of €17,603 vs €46,797 for CDLCI (p = 0.001) and €28,279 for CSAI (p = 0.008). For every patient treated annually with CDLCI, two could be treated with DBS (or €29,194 could be saved) and for every patient treated with CSAI, €10,676 could be saved with DBS. The initial DBS investment (32.2% of the total 5-year costs) was offset by decreases in anti-Parkinsonian drugs and follow-up costs. CDLCI and CSAI required constant drug use (i.e., levodopa and carbidopa for CDLCI, apomorphine for CSAI), representing ∼95% of their total 5-year cost.

LIMITATIONS

All costs were based on a questionnaire, not on actual clinical data. The study is not a cost-effectiveness analysis as there is a lack of comparable outcomes data. An expert panel was used due to the complexity and variability in the treatment of advanced PD. The sample size was relatively small.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, DBS requires less use of health resources than CDLCI or CSAI in advanced PD patients, mostly pharmacological. The initial DBS investment was offset at year 2 by reductions in the ongoing consumption of anti-Parkinsonian medication. For every patient treated annually with CDLCI or CSAI, substantial cost savings could be made with DBS.

A cost-effectiveness analysis of levodopa/carbidopa intestinal gel compared to standard care in late stage Parkinson's disease in the UK

OBJECTIVE

Evaluation of cost-effectiveness of levodopa/carbidopa intestinal gel (LCIG), compared to standard care (SC) in patients with advanced Parkinson's disease (aPD) in the UK.

DESIGN

Markov model to quantify costs and outcomes associated with LCIG versus SC in aPD patients at Hoehn and Yahr (H&Y) stages 3, 4 or 5 experiencing >50% OFF time per day. Time horizon was lifetime, LCIG treatment was assumed to last maximal 5 years after which patients revert to SC. Model comprised 12 aPD health states according to H&Y status and daily time spent in OFF state. Cost analyses are reported from a UK NHS and Personal Social Services perspective. Uncertainties were assessed through one-way sensitivity analyses.

COMPARATORS

LCIG, providing patients with continuous dopaminergic stimulation to maximise functional ON time during the day and SC, defined as medically determined best available oral medication.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Cost-effectiveness, based on quality adjusted life years gained, presented as an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio.

RESULTS

Lifetime analysis yields an incremental cost per QALY of £36,024 for LCIG compared to SC (incremental cost £39,644, QALY gain 1.1). Results were sensitive to time on treatment, health state on treatment initiation, and estimates of long term benefit (OWSA results from £32,127 to £66,421 per QALY). Findings must be considered in the context of the study limitations which were mainly due to data availability constraints.

CONCLUSIONS

LCIG is an effective treatment, reducing OFF time and improving quality of life in advanced PD. It provides value for money in levodopa-responsive aPD patients with severe motor fluctuations when no other treatment options are effective or suitable. Given LCIG is an orphan drug, it is reasonable to suggest that it may be considered cost-effective in the UK setting. However, further research is needed to complete current data gaps and increase robustness of the model.

Reducing uncertainty in value-based pricing using evidence development agreements: the case of continuous intraduodenal infusion of levodopa/carbidopa (Duodopa®) in Sweden

BACKGROUND

Value-based pricing (VBP), whereby prices are set according to the perceived benefits offered to the consumer at a time when costs and benefits are characterized by considerable uncertainty and are then reviewed ex post, is a much discussed topic in pharmaceutical reimbursement. It is usually combined with coverage with evidence development (CED), a tool in which manufacturers are granted temporary reimbursement but are required to collect and submit additional health economic data at review. Many countries, including the UK, are signalling shifts in this direction. Several countries, including Sweden, have already adopted this approach and offer good insight into the benefits and pitfalls in actual practice.

OBJECTIVE

To describe VBP reimbursement decision making using CED in actual practice in Sweden.

METHODS

Decision making by The Dental and Pharmaceutical Benefits Agency (TLV) in Sweden was reviewed using a case study of continuous intraduodenal infusion of levodopa/carbidopa (Duodopa®) in the treatment of advanced Parkinson's disease (PD) with severe motor fluctuations.

RESULTS

The manufacturer of Duodopa® applied for reimbursement in late 2003. While the proper economic data were not included in the submission, TLV granted reimbursement until early 2005 to provide time for the manufacturer to submit a formal economic evaluation. The re-submission with economic data was considered inadequate to judge cost effectiveness, so TLV granted an additional extension of reimbursement until August 2007, at which time conclusive data were expected. The manufacturer initiated a 3-year, prospective health economic study and a formal economic model. Data from a pre-planned interim analysis of the data were loaded into the model and the cost-effectiveness ratio was the basis of the next re-submission. TLV concluded that the data were suitable for making a definite decision and that the drug was not cost effective, deciding to discontinue reimbursement for any new patients (current patients were unaffected). The manufacturer continued to collect data and to improve the economic model and re-submitted in 2008. New data and the improved model resulted in reduced uncertainty and a lower cost-effectiveness ratio in the range of Swedish kronor (SEK)430,000 per QALY gained in the base-case analysis, ranging up to SEK900,000 in the most conservative sensitivity analysis, resulting in reimbursement being granted.

DISCUSSION

The case of Duodopa® provides excellent insight into VBP reimbursement decision making in combination with CED and ex post review in actual practice. Publicly available decisions document the rigorous, time-consuming process (four iterations were required before a final decision could be reached). The data generated as part of the risk-sharing agreement proved correct the initial decision to grant limited coverage despite lack of economic data. Access was provided to 100 patients while evidence was generated.

CONCLUSIONS

Economic appraisal differs from clinical assessment, and decision makers benefit from analysis of naturalistic, actual practice data. Despite reviewing the initial trial-based, 'piggy-back' economic analysis, TLV was uncertain of the cost effectiveness in actual practice and deferred a final decision until observational data from the DAPHNE study became available. Second, acceptance of economic modelling and use of temporary reimbursement conditional on additional evidence development provide a mechanism for risk sharing between TLV and manufacturers, which enabled patient access to a drug with proven clinical benefit while necessary evidence to support claims of cost effectiveness could be generated.

Short-term cost and health consequences of duodenal levodopa infusion in advanced Parkinson's disease in Sweden: an exploratory study

Levodopa is the cornerstone treatment for Parkinson's disease, but the short half-life of levodopa limits its usefulness in late stages of the disease. Duodenal levodopa infusion (DLI) allows more stable plasma levels and better motor symptom control. To explore the costs and health benefits of replacing conventional oral polypharmacy with DLI in patients with advanced Parkinson's disease, from a Swedish healthcare payer perspective. Based on a clinical, randomized, crossover study with 24 patients (DIREQT), a decision analytic model predicted 2-year drug costs and QALYs for conventional oral therapy and for DLI. Health-related quality of life (HR-QOL) was recorded using a 15-dimensional (15D) utility instrument at baseline and during the two 3-week trial periods, and then at eight follow-up visits during the subsequent 6 months. Use of medication was based on data from DIREQT and previous studies. Unit costs were based on market prices (drugs) and customary charges in Sweden. All costs were expressed in Swedish kronor (SEK), year 2004 values euro 1.00 approximately SEK9.17, $US1.00 = SEK7.47). Future costs and outcomes were discounted at 3%. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted. The mean utility scores were 0.77 for DLI and 0.72 for conventional therapy (p = 0.02). A considerable variation in the scores was observed during the study. The expected per-patient 2-year cost of DLI was SEK562 000 while it was SEK172 000 for conventional therapy. The mean number of QALYs was 1.48 and 1.42, respectively, representing an incremental cost of SEK6.1 million per QALY for DLI (all values discounted at 3%). Using other assumptions in sensitivity analyses, the cost per QALY could be as low as SEK456 000. This analysis can be considered exploratory only; it is based on very limited data. Nevertheless, our findings suggest that DLI results in a significant improvement in HR-QOL. However, the cost per QALY is likely to be higher than customary cost-effectiveness thresholds. Whether these benefits justify the additional costs depends on how the health benefits are measured and how these benefits are valued by society.

[The clinical-pharmacoeconomic study of efficacy of stalevo in the treatment of Parkinson's disease with motor fluctuations]

An open randomized study of pharmacoeconomic efficacy of stalevo in patients with Parkinson's disease with motor fluctuations was conducted. The results of the study revealed that the drug substantially reduced motor deficit, increased the "on"-period, decreased the duration and severity of the "off" period, improved the daily activity and quality of life of patients compared to standard therapy with an additional dosage of levodopa/DDC inhibitor. Despite the increase in cost, the use of stalevo in the treatment of Parkinson's disease with motor fluctuations is cost-effective in long-term (already after two years) management of patients.

Economic burden of Parkinson's disease in a developing country: a retrospective cost analysis in Shanghai, China

We investigated economic costs from patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) in Shanghai, China, which could be used as a baseline for future evaluations. Data were collected from 190 patients by interview during 1-year period. Direct medical care costs averaged approximately Chinese yuan, renminbi (RMB) 4,305 (USD 519, or EUR 410) per year per patient, of which drugs (RMB 2,677) accounted for the major costly component. Nonmedical direct costs were much less than direct health care costs, averaging approximately RMB 3,301 (USD 398, or EUR 314). Costs due to loss of productivity averaged approximately RMB 73 (USD 8.8, or EUR 7.0) per patient per year. Taken together, the overall mean annual cost for PD in our series was approximately RMB 7,679 (USD 925, or EUR 731), and these costs accounted for around half of the mean annual income. Total cost was significantly associated with the disease severity and the frequency of outpatient visits. In addition, levodopa equivalent dose (LED) and the number of drugs being taken were also closely related with the drug cost. The results indicate that the economic burden of Chinese PD patients is heavy.

Medikamentöse Therapie des Morbus Parkinson

Unser konzeptuelles Verständnis der Parkinson’schen Erkrankung hat sich in den letzten Jahren stark gewandelt. Wir verstehen heute unter Parkinson nicht nur eine Erkrankung des motorischen Systems, sondern auch eine Erkrankung mit nicht-motorischen Symptomen, deren Bedeutung für die Lebensqualität des Patienten und der Angehörigen enorm ist. Nach Jahren der Erkrankung kommen obligat Komplikationen der Therapie hinzu. Nach dem Vorliegen nicht-motorischer Symptome und Therapiekomplikationen soll aktiv gefragt werden, da sie oft weder von den Patienten noch den Angehörigen spontan mitgeteilt werden, sei es aus Scham, sei es, dass sie nicht als mit dem Parkinson assoziierte Probleme erkannt werden. Eine zufriedenstellende Therapie der Parkinson’schen Erkrankung setzt das Erkennen und Behandeln aller Symptome voraus, weshalb im folgenden Artikel auch auf die nicht-motorischen Probleme und Therapiekomplikationen eingegangen werden soll.

Clinical and economic results of bilateral subthalamic nucleus stimulation in Parkinson's disease

BACKGROUND

High frequency stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) is an alternative but expensive neurosurgical treatment for parkinsonian patients with levodopa induced motor complications.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the safety, clinical effects, quality of life, and economic cost of STN stimulation.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective multicentre study in 95 consecutive Parkinson's disease (PD) patients receiving bilateral STN stimulation and assessed its effects over 12 months. A double blind randomised motor evaluation was carried out at 3 month follow up, and quality of life, self care ability, and predictive factors of outcome following surgery were assessed. The cost of PD was estimated over 6 months before and after surgery.

RESULTS

The Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) motor score improved by 57% (p<0.0001) and activities of daily living improved by 48% (p<0.0001) at 12 month follow up. Double blind motor scoring improved by 51% at 3 month follow up (p<0.0001). The total PD Quality of Life Questionnaire (PDQL-37) score improved by 28% (p<0.001). The better the preoperative motor score after a levodopa challenge, the better the outcome after STN stimulation. Five patients developed an intracerebral haematoma during electrode implantation with permanent after effects in two. The 6 month costs of PD decreased from 10,087 euros before surgery to 1673 euros after surgery (p<0.0001) mainly because of the decrease in medication. These savings allowed a return on the procedure investment, estimated at 36,904 euros over 2.2 years.

CONCLUSIONS

STN stimulation has good outcomes with relatively low risk and little cost burden in PD patients with levodopa induced motor complications.

Effects of dyskinesias in Parkinson's disease on quality of life and health-related costs: a prospective European study

The treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD) with l-DOPA leads to involuntary movements (dyskinesias). This 6-month observational study in three European countries in PD patients with various degrees of motor complications examined the effects of dyskinesias on the quality of life (QoL) of patients and health care costs. Retrospective and prospective health economic data were collected, and QoL of patients was measured using the Short Form-36 (SF-36) and the PD Quality of Life (PDQL) Scale. Regression analysis was used to estimate the adjusted effects of dyskinesias on QoL and costs, whilst accounting for the potentially confounding effects of disease progression, motor fluctuations and country. Increasing dyskinesia scores on either the Unified PD Rating Scale or the Goetz Dyskinesia Rating Scale were associated with significant reductions in QoL scores on the SF-36 and PDQL Scale. Increasing dyskinesia severity was also associated with increased depression scores on the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale along with significant increases in health care costs. The effects of dyskinesia on QoL, depression and costs decreased but remained significant after adjustment for the confounding effects of disease progression and motor fluctuations. In conclusion, dyskinesias may adversely affect QoL and increase health care costs in patients with PD. Future studies should evaluate the potentially beneficial effects in terms of QoL and health care costs of strategies to delay the onset of, or the treatment of, dyskinesias.

Cost-effectiveness of levodopa/carbidopa/entacapone (Stalevo) compared to standard care in UK Parkinson's disease patients with wearing-off

BACKGROUND AND METHODS

A Markov model was developed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of levodopa/carbidopa/entacapone (LCE;Stalevo), in the treatment of patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) and end-of-dose motor fluctuations (wearing-off). LCE, with or without other antiparkinsonian medications, was compared to UK standard care, comprising traditional levodopa/ dopa-decarboxylase inhibitor (DDCI) with other antiparkinsonian medications (e.g. selegiline or dopamine agonists) added as needed. The costs and outcomes of both treatments were projected over a period of 10 years from the perspective (a) of society as a whole and (b) of the UK National Health Service (NHS). Sensitivity analyses, including second-order Monte Carlo simulations, were performed to assess the confidence level of the primary results.

RESULTS

Treatment with LCE produced an average gain of +1.04 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) per patient (2.57 vs. 1.53) in the base-case analysis (discount rate 3.5%). This gain was accompanied by a reduction in the total 10-year direct cost of care to society of 10198 pounds per patient ( approximately E14800). From the societal perspective, therefore, LCE was dominant, producing better clinical outcomes with lower costs. This dominance was reiterated in all sensitivity analyses of society-focused analysis, including a shortening of the time-frame to 5 years. Although treatment with LCE resulted in an increase in direct costs per patient of 3239 pounds (25756 pounds versus 22517 pounds) to the NHS over the 10-year period analysed, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of LCE was only 3105 pounds per QALY gained (approximately E4500). All ICERs to the NHS remained below 3800 pounds per QALY gained in univariate sensitivity analyses applying different discount rates. When a shorter, 5-year, time-horizon was analysed, the NHS-related ICER for LCE was 6526 pounds per QALY gained. All these ICERs are within the range usually considered to indicate acceptable or highly acceptable cost effectiveness (defined as < 30000 pounds per QALY gained). The results of the Monte Carlo simulations indicated that the likelihood of LCE being either 'dominant' or more effective at an 'acceptable cost' from either the societal or the NHS perspective was high, exceeding 96% in the base-case sensitivity analysis, and was 93% even when all the uncertainties associated with the model were taken into consideration simultaneously. In particular, compared to standard care, the probability that LCE would provide better outcomes at a lower cost to society as a whole was 77% in the base-case sensitivity analysis and 72% in the scenario involving the highest degree of uncertainty.

CONCLUSIONS

In the UK the use of LCE to treat PD patients with wearing-off is beneficial to individual patients and likely to offer money savings to society as a whole, compared with UK standard therapy. The added cost of the medication itself is exceeded by the savings made in other direct costs of PD, mainly those relating to social care or PD-related private expenditures.

Pramipexole and levodopa in early Parkinson's disease: dynamic changes in cost effectiveness

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

In chronic disease, treatment effects and costs accumulate over time; hence, the choice of time horizon in cost-effectiveness analysis can be particularly important. In this article we analyse the dynamic changes in cumulative costs, effects and incremental cost effectiveness of two competing drug strategies in patients with early Parkinson's disease (PD).

METHODS

Three hundred and one subjects with PD were randomised to initial pramipexole or levodopa and followed every 3 months over a 4-year period. Healthcare resource use was recorded in patient diaries and valued using a variety of sources at year 2002 US dollar values. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was measured using the EuroQoL EQ-5D. The study was conducted from a US societal perspective. Missing data were imputed using a multivariate fixed-effects model. Additional quality adjusted life years (QALY) gained by using pramipexole compared with levodopa were estimated as the area between the normalised treatment HRQoL profiles. The QALYs and costs for each treatment arm were calculated for various study horizons.The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) and the net monetary benefit (NB) [using 50,000 US dollars, 100,000 US dollars and 150,000 US dollars as the value of a QALY] were estimated, and were bootstrapped to calculate the standard errors. Cost-effectiveness acceptability curves (CEAC) were built to estimate the probability that pramipexole was cost effective given different societal values of QALY, for various study horizons.We conducted sensitivity analyses on the ICER and the NB to test their robustness to various assumptions about missing data, for various subpopulations and under changes in the drug prices.

RESULTS

Under the base-case assumptions, the ICER for pramipexole was 42,989 US dollars per QALY. Using the CEAC approach, the probability that pramipexole was cost effective relative to levodopa over the first 4 years was 0.57, 0.77 and 0.82 when a QALY was valued at 50,000 US dollars, 100,000 US dollars, and 150,000 US dollars, respectively. Over time, the ICER for pramipexole improved and uncertainty around the ICER decreased. If, after treatment withdrawal, HRQoL improved in pramipexole subjects and declined in levodopa subjects (best-case scenario for pramipexole), the probability of pramipexole being cost effective increased to 0.88, 0.96 and 0.98, respectively. Factors that improved the ICER of pramipexole were a decrease in the relative price of pramipexole and having low HRQoL or depression at baseline.

CONCLUSIONS

The cost effectiveness of pramipexole compared with levodopa in the treatment of early PD increased as the time horizon of the clinical trial extended from 2 to 4 years. Our results suggest that pramipexole is more cost effective for patients with depression and low baseline HRQoL than in other patient subgroups.

Deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus reduces antiparkinsonian medication costs

This study reports a retrospective analysis of 16 patients to determine changes in medication costs associated with deep brain stimulation of the bilateral subthalamic nucleus (DBS B-STN). Antiparkinsonian medication (APMED) costs were evaluated pre- and post-operatively at 1 and 2 years, based on prescribed dosages. After treatment with DBS, patients experienced a 32% reduction in APMED costs after 1 year and a 39% reduction after 2 years. Hypothetical projections of total potential savings are presented, accounting for increasingly complex medication regimens and medication cost inflation. DBS patients may experience a significant long-term reduction in the cost of their pharmacologic treatment.

[Use of tremonorm in treatment of Parkinson's disease: outpatient experience of Moscow Municipal Health Care Service]

The efficacy of domestic drug tremonorm (levadopa-carbidopa) for Parkinson's disease (PD) treatment was studied. The treatment was conducted in neurological outpatient departments in several Moscow administrative regions and was administered to 142 PD patients, 15 being assigned to this drug for the first time and 127 being previously treated with other medications containing levadopa/carbidopa. A minimal effective dose (up to 500 mg) was selected for each patient and was not changed during 2 months. For patients previously switched to levadopa, the change for tremonorm has been done during 1 day if the dose of levadopa did not exceed 500 mg, and during 2 months in case a patient received over 500 mg per day. Modified Hoehn&Yahr scale, UPDRS, MMSE, PDQ-39 and other scales were used in complex evaluation of the disease stage. Positive effect of tremonorm was detected for 94 patients (66.2%), all of them continued tremonorm therapy after the end of the study. The most frequent side-effects proved to be dyspeptic symptoms. Tremonorm caused statistically significant positive changes in patient's movement scaled by UPDRS and the QL indexes in all PDQ-39 subscales. Positive changes in movement activity were accompanied by decrease of bradykinesia, tremor, better walking, writing and every day activity of PD patients. A change of nacom for tremonorm did not result in significant alteration of symptoms and Quality of Life indexes that suggest similar influence of these drugs on PD symptomatology. At the same time, a substantially lower price of tremonorm allows reducing of treatment costs.

[Cost analysis in Italy of various strategies for the treatment of Parkinson disease in the advanced phase]

OBJECTIVE

To perform a comparative economic evaluation of therapies--L-dopa drugs, subcutaneous infusion of apomorphine and surgical intervention of Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS)--for the treatment of advanced Parkinson's disease (APD) and to verify the level of assistance guaranteed in Italy to patients affected by APD.

METHODS

Literature review and Delphi Panel to collect data about the efficacy of the therapies for the treatment of APD and the use of healthcare resources for such therapies. Field survey to investigate financing mechanisms of the therapeutical alternatives in the Italian regions; cost-analysis over five years (NHS perspective); cost-analysis (hospital perspective) for the initial administration of therapeutic alternatives.

RESULTS

Literature review shows that the reduction of the "off-periods" is 62% for Apomorphine and 80-90% for DBS compared to traditional therapy. The 5-years economic analysis from the NHS perspective shows that the cost of a patients with APD is [symbol: see text] 58.065 if treated with traditional therapy, [symbol: see text] 36.423 (including infusional pump and the drug) with subcutaneous apomorphine and respectively [symbol: see text] 56.489 and [symbol: see text] 41.379 (depending on reimbursement of electrodes and neurostimulator on top of the DRG tariff) with DBS. The field survey, highlighted that Regions which currently reimburse the infusion pump for apomorphine and the electrodes and neurostimulator for DBS--on top of the DRG tariff--are a very limited number.

CONCLUSIONS

Apomorphine and DBS in the treatment of APD show higher efficacy and lower costs compared to traditional therapy.

Cabergoline versus levodopa monotherapy: a decision analysis

We evaluated the incremental cost-effectiveness of cabergoline compared with levodopa monotherapy in patients with early Parkinson's disease (PD) in the German healthcare system. The study design was based on cost-effectiveness analysis using a Markov model with a 10-year time horizon. Model input data was based on a clinical trial "Early Treatment of PD with Cabergoline" as well as on cost data of a German hospital/office-based PD network. Direct and indirect medical and nonmedical costs were included. Outcomes were costs, disease stage, cumulative complication incidence, and mortality. An annual discount rate of 5% was applied and the societal perspective was chosen. The target population included patients in Hoehn and Yahr Stages I to III. It was found that the occurrence of motor complications was significantly lower in patients on cabergoline monotherapy. For patients aged >/=60 years of age, cabergoline monotherapy was cost effective when considering costs per decreased UPDRS score. Each point decrease in the UPDRS (I-IV) resulted in costs of euro;1,031. Incremental costs per additional motor complication-free patient were euro;104,400 for patients <60 years of age and euro;57,900 for patients >/=60 years of age. In conclusion, this decision-analytic model calculation for PD was based almost entirely on clinical and observed data with a limited number of assumptions. Although costs were higher in patients on cabergoline, the corresponding cost-effectiveness ratio for cabergoline was at least as favourable as the ratios for many commonly accepted therapies.

The increased utilisation of dopamine agonists and the introduction of COMT inhibitors have not reduced levodopa consumption--a nation-wide perspective in Sweden

OBJECTIVE

To study the impact of the new pharmacological treatment strategies in Parkinson's disease by analysis of the sales of dopaminergic drugs in Sweden 1990-2001.

METHODS

Invoice statistics and statistics on prescription sales of dopaminergic drugs 1990-2001 were obtained from the 906 public pharmacies and the 89 hospital pharmacies in Sweden. The Swedish Diagnosis and therapy survey was used to study the diagnosis the drugs were prescribed for.

RESULTS

During the period the sales expressed in DDD/1000 inhabitants and day increased from 1.75 to 1.86 (6%) for levodopa and from 0.04 to 0.27 (575%) for dopamine agonists. The increase in sales of dopamine agonists occurred after 1997 and consisted entirely of the sales of the new agonists, cabergoline, pramipexole and ropinirole. In Swedish crowns the total sales of dopaminergic drugs increased with 126% during the period. The cost for the dopamine agonists was 8% of the total cost for dopaminergic drugs in 1990 and 23% in 2001. The prescription sales figures of levodopa and dopamine agonists for the different Swedish counties in 2001 varied between 1.52 and 2.44 and 0.13 and 0.74 DDD/1000 inhabitants and day, respectively. There was no correlation, whether positive or negative, between the sales of dopamine agonists, levodopa and COMT inhibitors or between the sales and the densities of neurologists.

CONCLUSION

The consumption of levodopa in Sweden continues to increase in spite of a dramatic increase in the utilisation of dopamine agonists and the introduction of COMT-inhibitors.

Cost analysis of ropinirole versus levodopa in the treatment of Parkinson's disease

BACKGROUND

Not all patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) respond to levodopa and others develop dyskinesias. Ropinirole, a dopamine agonist, is associated with fewer dyskinesias than levodopa.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the economic impact of reducing dyskinesias using ropinirole instead of levodopa plus benserazide in PD was examined. The research question addressed was: is the added cost of ropinirole offset by savings due to avoided cases of dyskinesia?

METHODS

A cost-minimisation analysis was performed from both the societal and Ministry of Health (MoH) of Ontario, Canada perspectives, using 5-year data from a study of dyskinesia outcomes comparing ropinirole with levodopa plus benserazide. A predictive model was developed to capture resource utilisation over 5 years, such as medication costs, medical consultations, hospital admissions, nursing home admissions, caregiver time and productivity loss. The model was based on a previously reported clinical trial which determined dyskinesia rates to be 20% for ropinirole and 45% for levodopa. Standard costing lists were used, and costs were discounted at various rates. Constant 1999 Canadian dollars ($Can) were applied, and no increases were assumed over the time horizon of the analysis. A multivariate sensitivity analysis with changes in key parameters was also performed.

RESULTS

From a societal perspective, ropinirole was cost saving. From the MoH perspective, the analysis yielded an incremental expected daily cost/patient of $Can4.41 for substituting levodopa plus benserazide with ropinirole. Ropinirole resulted in daily savings/patient of $Can0.17 in non-drug healthcare costs. In the sensitivity analysis, the direction of results did not change despite changes of 15 to 20% in key parameters, suggesting robustness of the model.

CONCLUSIONS

From the societal perspective, in comparison with levodopa plus benserazide, the added cost of ropinirole is offset by savings due to avoided cases of dyskinesia.

Biosynthesis of L-DOPA by Aspergillus oryzae

The present investigation deals with the biosynthesis of L-DOPA by parental (GCB-6) and mutant (UV-7) strains of Aspergillus oryzae. There was a marked difference between the mycelial morphology and pellet type of parental and UV-irradiated mutant culture. The mutant strain of A. oryzae UV-6 exhibited pellet-like mycelial morphology and improved tyrosinase activity. Mould mycelium was used for biochemical conversion of L-tyrosine to L-DOPA because tyrosinase is an intracellular enzyme. The mutant was found to yield 3.72 fold higher production of L-DOPA than the parental strain. The mutant strain is stable and D-glc-resistant. The comparison of kinetic parameters was also done which showed the greater ability of the mutant to yield L-DOPA (i.e., Yp/x 40.00+/-0.01 d mg/mg with parent and 182.86+/-0.02a mg/mg in case of mutant). When cultures grown for various incubation periods, were monitored for Qp, Qs and q(p), there was significant enhancement (p < 0.0025-0.005) in these variables by the mutant strain of A. oryzae UV-7 over GCB-6 on all the rates. L-DOPA (3,4-dihydroxy phenyl L-alanine) is a drug of choice in the treatment of Parkinson's disease and myocardium following neurogenic injury.

Cost effectiveness of treatment of Parkinson's disease with entacapone in the United States

OBJECTIVE

To determine the cost effectiveness of adjunctive therapy with entacapone versus standard treatment (levodopa) without entacapone for patients in the US with Parkinson's disease (PD) who experience 'off-time' (re-emergence of the symptoms of PD) while receiving levodopa.

STUDY DESIGN

A Markov model was used to estimate 5-year costs and effectiveness of standard treatment with and without entacapone.

METHODS

Probabilities, unit costs, resource utilisation data and utilities were obtained from published literature, clinical trial reports, a national database, and clinical experts. PD disability was measured using the daily proportion of off-time and Hoehn and Yahr scale scores. The analysis measured costs from a societal and third-party payer perspective, and effectiveness as gains in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and years without progression to >25% off-time.

RESULTS

From a societal perspective, entacapone therapy resulted in an incremental cost of US dollars 9327 per QALY gained compared with standard treatment. Treatment with entacapone also provided an additional 7.6 months with < or =25% off-time/day compared with standard treatment. Sensitivity analyses indicated that the model is sensitive to changes in rates of improvement/deterioration of off-time, and to the number of doses per day of levodopa with adjunctive entacapone.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of entacapone to standard treatment for patients receiving levodopa who experience off-time provides additional QALYs and gain in time with minimal fluctuations. Results of this modelling exercise suggest that therapy with entacapone may be cost effective when compared with standard treatment for PD.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of entacapone in Parkinson's disease: a Markov process analysis

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to examine the cost-effectiveness of a complementary treatment with entacapone versus usual care only in patients with Parkinson's disease.

METHODS

The setting for this study was the Netherlands. A Markov process model was constructed to model the average quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and the costs of both treatments. The model examined a period of 5 years in order to capture the influence of symptom improvement and disease progression. Data for the construction of the model were derived from published literature, including large, multicenter, randomized clinical trials in patients with end-of-dose motor fluctuations. Costs were obtained from published sources.

RESULTS

The results of the baseline analysis showed that the use of entacapone as complementary therapy in Parkinson's disease slightly decreased the total average discounted costs from NLG 111,317 to NLG 110,038, while effectiveness increased from 2.42 to 2.56 QALYs (a 6% increase). In addition, entacapone substantially increased time without severe fluctuations by 0.63 years. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of these findings.

CONCLUSION

The study shows that entacapone is a cost-effective treatment in patients with Parkinson's disease: entacapone yields higher effectiveness in terms of both effectiveness measures (time without severe fluctuations and QALYs), while costs remain quite similar to those for usual care. The additional drug costs for entacapone are offset by reductions in other costs.

[Social and economic cost of L-Dopa-induced dyskinesias in patients with Parkinson's disease]

Long term L-Dopa medication mainly induces two complications in Parkinson's Disease (PD) patients, i.e. motor fluctuations and dyskinesias. Both of these complications can significantly impair the patient's quality of life. At a high degree of severity, dyskinesias can interfere with everyday tasks, balance, speech, etc. From a clinical point of view, they lead to complicated L-Dopa dose adjustments or to the use of sustained release forms. For these reasons, L-Dopa-induced dyskinesias may have a significant human and financial impact. We have designed a retrospective study to explore two aspects of PD, i.e. the impact of dyskinesias on patient's social life and their economic cost. Ten French neurologists were randomly selected from a national file to participate in this study. They were asked to include 4 patients with PD currently under L-Dopa medication and showing 4 different levels of dyskinesia severity, i.e. absent, moderate, mild and severe dyskinesia, according to the Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale, with no other specific inclusion criteria. Two specific scales were to be completed, Hoehn & Yahr on disease severity and Schwab & England on degree of independence. Clinical profiles of patients, demographics and use of medical resources were also recorded. Investigators were interviewed about their practice. This study showed that patients with dyskinesias had an earlier onset of the disease (11.2 years vs. 3.7 years). They also had a higher level of disease severity, according to the Hoehn & Yahr scale (40p. cent vs. 0p. cent presenting a level of 4). The mean monthly cost was significantly higher for patients with dyskinesias (FF 3 733 versus FF 1 109, p=0.0005). Particularly, the presence of dyskinesias had a significant impact on treatment costs and medical visits. A positive gradient of the medical cost with level of dyskinesia severity was also underlined. In the same way, the more severe the dyskinesia status the greater the need for caregivers. Finally, based on these results, the total annual medical cost of dyskinesias in France was estimated between 588 and 812 million francs.

Pharmacoeconomic analysis of using Sinemet CR over standard Sinemet in parkinsonian patients with motor fluctuations

OBJECTIVE

To compare the costs of pharmacotherapy in patients with Parkinson's disease before and after converting from standard Sinemet to extended-release Sinemet CR.

DESIGN

Investigators retrospectively reviewed records of patients converting from Sinemet to Sinemet CR for efficacy and total drug costs. Cost-effectiveness was evaluated retrospectively from data collected in prospective Sinemet CR efficacy trials.

SETTING

Parkinson's disease clinic at a tertiary care university teaching hospital.

PATIENTS

100 patients with motor fluctuations who had undergone an initial 6-month course of Sinemet therapy, followed by a 6-month course of Sinemet CR.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Total cost was measured as the cost of Sinemet formulations plus the costs of other antiparkinson medications. Differences in pre- and postconversion costs were compared by using the paired, two-tailed Student's t-test. A substudy of 39 patients on the cost-effectiveness of conversion measured the ratio of daily medication costs to the daily hours "on" without chorea.

RESULTS

While total daily medication costs after conversion increased by 21%, patients experienced either a comparable or an improved degree of disease control with Sinemet CR. Patients who were also taking selegiline were able to decrease selegiline expense by 20%. The costs of other adjunctive medications did not differ significantly after conversion. The cost-effectiveness analysis revealed an increase in postconversion on time by 2.2 hours (p = 0.0001), accompanied by a $2.85 decrease in total cost per hour on without chorea (p = 0.11).

CONCLUSIONS

Although Sinemet CR is more costly, it may be more cost-effective in patients with motor fluctuations. Some patients may be able to reduce adjunctive medications.

Costs of drug treatment in Parkinson's disease

Parkinson's disease (PD) has a major socioeconomic impact on society. The chronic, progressive course of the disease, which often leads to severe disability, results in high expenses for the medical resources used for treatment, care, and rehabilitation of patients as well as reduced or lost productivity as a result of illness or premature death. In Great Britain, it has been estimated that the National Health Service spends up to 383 million pound sterling (1992) annually for the care of PD. This emphasizes the importance of assessing the costs related to this disease. A detailed knowledge of the cost allocation would provide a solid basis on which health care priorities can be rationally set. Next to hospitalization, drug treatment accounts for the highest expense for direct medical costs of PD. Therefore, this analysis focuses on the costs of drug treatment for PD. The cost analysis was based on a retrospective study of 409 patients with PD who were seen over a 1-year period in our movement disorders clinic. The cost of therapy varied considerably depending on the severity of the condition (assessed in the "off" phase), the incidence of motor fluctuations, and the type of PD. In the early stage of the disease (Hoehn and Yahr stage I [HY I]), mean daily costs for therapy were DM (German marks) 6.60, which increased in later stages of the disease (HY V) to DM 22.00. If rare cases requiring continuous subcutaneous apomorphine infusion were included, mean daily costs of patients in HY V rose to DM 32.50 (the mean daily costs of subcutaneous apomorphine-treated patients in HY V: DM 74.30). Patients with motor fluctuations accounted for higher costs (DM 16.50) compared with those without motor fluctuations (DM 7.80). With respect to the three subtypes of PD, the mean daily expenditure was DM 7.00 for the tremor-dominant type, DM 12.40 for the akinetic-rigid type, and DM 10.80 for the mixed type. In the group of 409 PD patients included in this analysis, the average daily expenditure for drug treatment totaled DM 10.70 per patient (including patients on subcutaneous apomorphine).