1
|
van Oosterhout SPC, van der Niet AG, Abdo WF, Boenink M, Cherpanath TGV, Epker JL, Kotsopoulos AM, van Mook WNKA, Sonneveld HPC, Volbeda M, Olthuis G, van Gurp JLP. How clinicians discuss patients' donor registrations of consent and presumed consent in donor conversations in an opt-out system: a qualitative embedded multiple-case study. Crit Care 2023; 27:299. [PMID: 37507800 PMCID: PMC10375668 DOI: 10.1186/s13054-023-04581-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2023] [Accepted: 07/13/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Netherlands introduced an opt-out donor system in 2020. While the default in (presumed) consent cases is donation, family involvement adds a crucial layer of influence when applying this default in clinical practice. We explored how clinicians discuss patients' donor registrations of (presumed) consent in donor conversations in the first years of the opt-out system. METHODS A qualitative embedded multiple-case study in eight Dutch hospitals. We performed a thematic analysis based on audio recordings and direct observations of donor conversations (n = 15, 7 consent and 8 presumed consent) and interviews with the clinicians involved (n = 16). RESULTS Clinicians' personal considerations, their prior experiences with the family and contextual factors in the clinicians' profession defined their points of departure for the conversations. Four routes to discuss patients' donor registrations were constructed. In the Consent route (A), clinicians followed patients' explicit donation wishes. With presumed consent, increased uncertainty in interpreting the donation wish appeared and prompted clinicians to refer to "the law" as a conversation starter and verify patients' wishes multiple times with the family. In the Presumed consent route (B), clinicians followed the law intending to effectuate donation, which was more easily achieved when families recognised and agreed with the registration. In the Consensus route (C), clinicians provided families some participation in decision-making, while in the Family consent route (D), families were given full decisional capacity to pursue optimal grief processing. CONCLUSION Donor conversations in an opt-out system are a complex interplay between seemingly straightforward donor registrations and clinician-family interactions. When clinicians are left with concerns regarding patients' consent or families' coping, families are given a larger role in the decision. A strict uniform application of the opt-out system is unfeasible. We suggest incorporating the four previously described routes in clinical training, stimulating discussions across cases, and encouraging public conversations about donation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sanne P C van Oosterhout
- Department of IQ Healthcare, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Kapittelweg 54, 6525 EP, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Anneke G van der Niet
- Department of IQ Healthcare, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Kapittelweg 54, 6525 EP, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - W Farid Abdo
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Marianne Boenink
- Department of IQ Healthcare, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Kapittelweg 54, 6525 EP, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Thomas G V Cherpanath
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jelle L Epker
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Angela M Kotsopoulos
- Department of Intensive Care, Elisabeth Tweesteden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - Walther N K A van Mook
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Hans P C Sonneveld
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Isala Hospital, Zwolle, The Netherlands
| | - Meint Volbeda
- Department of Critical Care, University of Groningen, University Medical Center, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Gert Olthuis
- Department of IQ Healthcare, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Kapittelweg 54, 6525 EP, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Jelle L P van Gurp
- Department of IQ Healthcare, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Kapittelweg 54, 6525 EP, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Fox DE, Donald M, Chong C, Quinn RR, Ronksley PE, Elliott MJ, Lam NN. A Qualitative Content Analysis of Comments on Press Articles on Deemed Consent for Organ Donation in Canada. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2022; 17:1656-1664. [PMID: 36288931 PMCID: PMC9718046 DOI: 10.2215/cjn.04340422] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2022] [Accepted: 09/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES In 2019, two Canadian provinces became the first jurisdictions in North America to pass deemed consent legislation to increase deceased organ donation and transplantation rates. We sought to explore the perspectives of the deemed consent legislation for organ donation in Canada from the viewpoint of individuals commenting on press articles. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS In this qualitative descriptive study, we extracted public comments regarding deemed consent from online articles published by four major Canadian news outlets between January 2019 and July 2020. A total of 4357 comments were extracted from 35 eligible news articles. Comments were independently analyzed by two research team members using a conventional content analysis approach. RESULTS Commenters' perceptions of the deemed consent legislation for organ donation in Canada predominantly fit within three organizational groups: perceived positive implications of the bills, perceived negative implications of the bills, and key considerations. Three themes emerged within each group that summarized perspectives of the proposed legislation. Themes regarding the perceived positive implications of the bills included majority rules, societal effect, and prioritizing donation. Themes regarding the perceived negative implications of the bills were a right to choose, the potential for abuse and errors, and a possible slippery slope. Improving government transparency and communication, clarifying questions and addressing concerns, and providing evidence for the bills were identified as key considerations. CONCLUSIONS If deemed consent legislation is meant to increase organ donation and transplantation, addressing public concerns will be important to ensure successful implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danielle E. Fox
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Maoliosa Donald
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Christy Chong
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Robert R. Quinn
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Paul E. Ronksley
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Meghan J. Elliott
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Ngan N. Lam
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Baumann A, Thilly N, Joseph L, Claudot F. Ethical reflection support for potential organ donors' relatives: A narrative review. Nurs Ethics 2022; 29:660-674. [PMID: 35172649 DOI: 10.1177/09697330211015274] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Even in countries with an opt-out or presumed consent system, relatives have a considerable influence on the post-mortem organ harvesting decision. However, their reflection capacity may be compromised by grief, and they are, therefore, often prone to choose refusal as default option. Quite often, it results in late remorse and dissatisfaction. So, a high-quality reflection support seems critical to enable them to gain a stable position and a long-term peace of mind, and also avoid undue loss of potential grafts. In practice, recent studies have shown that the ethical aspects of reflection are rarely and often poorly discussed with relatives and that no or incomplete guidance is offered. No review of the literature is available to date, although it could be of value to improve the quality of the daily practice. OBJECTIVES The objective was to review and synthesize the main concepts and approaches, theories and practices of ethical reflection support of the relatives or surrogates of potential post-mortem organ donors. RESEARCH DESIGN A narrative review was performed in the medical, psychological and ethical fields using PubMed, PsycArticles and Web of Science databases (1980-2020). RESULTS Out of 150 papers, 25 were finally retained. Four themes were drawn: the moral status of the potential post-mortem organ donor, the principlistic approach with its limits and critics, the narrative approach and the transcendental approach. DISCUSSION This review suggests an extension of psychological support towards ethical reflection support. The process of helping relatives in their ethical exploration of post-mortem organ donation is psychologically and morally characterized. The need for specialized professionals educated and experienced both in clinical psychology and in health ethics to carry out this task is discussed. PRACTICAL IMPACT This review could contribute to optimize the quality of the ethical reflection support by initiating an evolution from an empirical, partial and individual-dependent support to a more systematized, professionalized and exhaustive support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antoine Baumann
- Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, France; Université de Lorraine, France
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Shaw D, Wildhaber BE, Martin AL, Elger BS, Brierley J. Ethical versus psychological issues in paediatric organ donation: an analysis of UK and Swiss practice. J R Soc Med 2021; 115:5-11. [PMID: 34487471 DOI: 10.1177/01410768211029141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- David Shaw
- Institute for Biomedical Ethics, University of Basel, Basel 4056, Switzerland.,Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands. postcode 6200MD
| | | | | | - Bernice S Elger
- Institute for Biomedical Ethics, University of Basel, Basel 4056, Switzerland.,University Center of Legal Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva 1211, Switzerland
| | - Joe Brierley
- Great Ormond Street Children's Hospital, London WC1N 3JH, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gardiner D, McGee A, Shaw D. Two fundamental ethical and legal rules for deceased organ donation. BJA Educ 2021; 21:292-299. [PMID: 34306730 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjae.2021.03.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- D Gardiner
- Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - A McGee
- Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - D Shaw
- Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Institute for Biomedical Ethics, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Raho JA, Brown-Saltzman K, Korenman SG, Weiss F, Orentlicher D, Lin JA, Moreno EA, Nuri-Robins K, Stein A, Schnell KE, Diamant AL, Weiss IK. Ethics of organ procurement from the unrepresented patient population. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS 2019; 45:751-754. [PMID: 31506293 DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105584] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2019] [Revised: 08/22/2019] [Accepted: 08/26/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
The shortage of organs for transplantation by its nature prompts ethical dilemmas. For example, although there is an imperative to save human life and reduce suffering by maximising the supply of vital organs, there is an equally important obligation to ensure that the process by which we increase the supply respects the rights of all stakeholders. In a relatively unexamined practice in the USA, organs are procured from unrepresented decedents without their express consent. Unrepresented decedents have no known healthcare wishes or advance care planning document; they also lack a surrogate. The Revised Uniform Anatomical Gift Act (RUAGA) of 2006 sends a mixed message about the procurement of organs from this patient population and there are hospitals that authorise donation. In addition, in adopting the RUAGA, some states included provisions that clearly allow organ procurement from unrepresented decedents. An important unanswered question is whether this practice meets the canons of ethical permissibility. The current Brief Report presents two principled approaches to the topic as a way of highlighting some of the complexities involved. Concluding remarks offer suggestions for future research and discussion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph A Raho
- Ethics Center, UCLA Health System, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | | | - Stanley G Korenman
- Department of Endocrinology, David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Fredda Weiss
- UCLA Ethics Committee, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | | | - James A Lin
- Department of Pediatrics, David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Elisa A Moreno
- Department of Psychiatry, David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | | | - Andrea Stein
- UCLA Ethics Committee, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Karen E Schnell
- Department of Spiritual Care, UCLA Health, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Allison L Diamant
- General Internal Medicine and Health Sciences Research, David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Irwin K Weiss
- Department of Pediatrics, David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|