Presentation and outcomes of patients with thoracic and lumbosacral spinal epidural arteriovenous fistulas: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Spinal dural and epidural fistulas: role of cone beam CT in diagnosis and treatment

Understanding normal spinal arterial and venous anatomy, and spinal vascular disease, is impossible without flow-based methods. Development of practical spinal angiography led to site-specific categorization of spinal vascular conditions, defined by the 'seat of disease' in relation to the cord and its covers. This enabled identification of targets for highly successful surgical and endovascular treatments, and guided interpretation of later cross-sectional imaging.Spinal dural and epidural arteriovenous fistulas represent the most common types of spinal shunts. Although etiology is debated, anatomy provides excellent pathophysiologic correlation. A spectrum of fistulas, from foramen magnum to the sacrum, is now well-characterized.Most recently, use of cone beam CT angiography has yielded new insights into normal and pathologic anatomy, including venous outflow. It provides unrivaled visualization of the fistula and its relationship with spinal cord vessels, and is the first practical method to study normal and pathologic spinal veins in vivo-with multiple implications for both safety and efficacy of treatments. We advocate consistent use of cone beam CT imaging in modern spinal fistula evaluation.The role of open surgery is likely to remain undiminished, with increasing availability and use of hybrid operating rooms for practical intraoperative angiography enhancing safety and efficacy of complex surgery.

Clinical presentation and treatment of 26 spinal epidural arteriovenous fistulas: a single-center experience

BACKGROUND

Spinal epidural arteriovenous fistulas (SEDAVFs) are rarely diagnosed vascular malformations that can cause spinal cord compression and congestive myelopathy.

METHODS

This is a single-center, retrospective case series of patients with SEDAVFs who underwent observation or treatment at UCLA medical center between 1993 and 2023.

RESULTS

Between 1993 and 2023 a total of 26 patients at UCLA were found to have a SEDAVF. The median age at treatment was 59 years (range 4 months to 91 years). Compared with sacral, lumbar, and thoracic SEDAVFs, patients with cervical SEDAVF were younger (41 years vs 63 years, P=0.016) and more likely to be female (66.7% vs 14.3%, P=0.006). Possible triggers for development of SEDAVFs may be prior spinal surgery or trauma (n=4), turning the neck (n=1), lifting a heavy box (n=1), a prolonged period of bending over (n=1), and neurofibromatosis type 1 (n=1). Of the 22 patients treated endovascularly, 18 (82%) were angiographically cured on the first attempt without complications. One patient underwent surgical treatment alone and had a failed surgery on the first attempt, and developed a surgical site infection after the second successful attempt at treatment. Of the 16 patients with adequate clinical follow-up, 11 (69%) demonstrated early improved clinical outcome (eg, improved strength on examination, absent bruit).

CONCLUSIONS

SEDAVFs are a rarely diagnosed disease that can be treated effectively and safely with endovascular embolization in most cases. Patients with sacral, lumbar, and thoracic SEDAVFs were older and more often male compared to patients with cervical SEDAVFs.

Vascular Myelopathies

OBJECTIVE

Vascular injuries of the spinal cord are less common than those involving the brain; however, they can be equally devastating. This article discusses the diagnosis and management of ischemic and hemorrhagic vascular disorders of the spinal cord.

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS

Clinical suspicion remains the mainstay for recognizing vascular myelopathies, yet diagnoses are often delayed and challenging in part because of their rarity and atypical manifestations. Noninvasive imaging such as CT and MRI continues to improve in spatial resolution and diagnostic precision; however, catheter-based spinal angiography remains the gold standard for defining the spinal angioarchitecture. In addition to hemorrhagic and ischemic disease, the contribution of venous dysfunction is increasingly appreciated and informs treatment strategies in conditions such as intracranial hypotension.

ESSENTIAL POINTS

Vascular disorders of the spine manifest in variable and often atypical ways, which may lead to delayed diagnosis. Increased awareness of these conditions is critical for early recognition and treatment. The goal of treatment is to minimize long-term morbidity and mortality.

Angiographic challenges of spinal dural and epidural arteriovenous fistulas: report on 45 cases

PURPOSE

The localization of the fistula level in spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas (dAVFs) and epidural arteriovenous fistulas (edAVFs) remains a diagnostic challenge.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with spinal dAVFs and edAVFs in the thoracic, lumbar, and sacral regions were included. The primary endpoint was to describe the characteristics of patients who required angiography with multiple catheterizations of segmental arteries (10 or more).

RESULTS

Forty-five patients (median age 69 years; male 89%; dAVFs, n = 31; edAVFs, n = 14) were included. Spinal dAVFs commonly developed in the thoracic region and edAVFs in the lumbosacral region. Fistulas were predicted at the correct level or plus/minus 2 level in less invasive examinations using multi-detector CT angiography (n = 28/36, 78%) and/or contrast-enhanced MR angiography (n = 9/14, 64%). We encountered diagnostic challenges in the localization of fistulas in 6 patients. They underwent angiography a median of 2 times. In each patient, spinal levels were examined at a median of 25 levels with a median radiation exposure of 3971 mGy and 257 ml of contrast. Fistulas were finally localized at the high thoracic region (T4-6) in 3 patients, the sacral region (S1-2) in 2, and the lumbar region (L3) in 1. Four patients were diagnosed with edAVFs and 2 with dAVFs. The correlation coefficient between the fistula level and the rostral end of the intramedullary T2 high-signal intensity on MRI was interpreted as none.

CONCLUSION

In patients in whom less invasive examinations failed for fistula localization, high thoracic or sacral AVFs need to be considered.

Spinal dural and epidural arteriovenous fistula: Recurrence rate after surgical and endovascular treatment

Introduction

Spinal dural arteriovenous fistula consist of an heterogenous group of vascular malformation often causing severe neurological deficit due to progressive myelopathy. This type of malformation could be associated with subarachnoid or subdural hemorrhage inside the spinal canal. In the English literature surgical treatment is regarded as the best option if compared to endovascular procedure, being the latter associated with an increased risk of relapse despite its less invasiveness.

Methods

In this study a retrospective analysis of 30 patients with spinal dural and epidural fistula associated with perimedullary venous congestion was undertaken. The radiological and clinical presentation of each patient is analyzed, and the grade of myelopathy is classified through the mJOA score.

Results

A total number of 31 out of 41 collected procedures (22 surgery vs. 19 endovascular) were dural fistulas while the remaining 10 were classified as epidural. A 46% recurrence rate for endovascular treatment against 0% for surgical (p-value 0.004) was described for dural fistulas, while in the epidural fistula group the rate of recurrence was 80% and 20% respectively for endovascular and surgery treatment (p-value 0.6).

Discussion

According to the results, surgical treatment could be considered as first-line treatment for spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas. Endovascular embolization can be proposed in selected cases, as a less invasive technique, for elderly patients or with important comorbidities. In spinal epidural arteriovenous fistulas, in view of the greater invasiveness of the surgical treatment and the non-significant difference in terms of recurrence risk between the two techniques, endovascular treatment could be proposed as a first choice treatment; in the event of a recurrence, a surgical intervention will instead be proposed in a short time.

Spinal epidural arteriovenous fistula with improved sphincter impairment detected by intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring

Background:

A spinal epidural arteriovenous fistula (SEAVF) is a rare type of arteriovenous shunt that occurs mainly in the thoracic or lumbar spine. Patients with SEAVF develop motor/sensory disturbances of the lower extremities and sphincter dysfunction. Among these symptoms, sphincter impairments show less improvement than others, and its relevance to neurophysiological monitoring has not been documented.

Case Description:

A 77-year-old woman presented with progressive motor weakness and numbness in the lower extremities and urinary and fecal incontinence. Spinal magnetic resonance imaging showed spinal cord edema in Th5-Th11 and enlarged perimedullary veins. We performed spinal angiography and endovascular treatment under intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IOM), including sensory evoked potential (SEP), motor evoked potential (MEP), and bulbocavernosus reflex (BCR) monitoring. Diagnostic angiography revealed a SEAVF with perimedullary venous drainage fed by the left L2 segmental artery. The shunt was completely embolized using N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate. Although SEP and MEP of the lower legs were recordable during treatment, anal MEP and BCR were not observed. The sphincter symptoms improved 1.5 years after the treatment. Follow-up angiography revealed no shunt recurrence and improved venous congestion. Anal MEP and BCR were detected during angiography, indicating neurophysiological improvement in sphincter function. The prolonged latency of the monitoring suggested a pudendal nerve injury.

Conclusion:

This case report first described improvement of the IOM correlated with the functional recovery of sphincters after embolization of a SEAVF. Follow-up neurophysiological monitoring is important to assess the functional recovery of the sphincter.

Treatment of Spinal Arteriovenous Malformation and Fistula

With the rapid advancements in endovascular therapy over previous decades, the treatment of spinal arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) continues to evolve. The decision to use endovascular versus surgical therapy largely depends on the type of lesion and its anatomic location. Recent studies demonstrate that endovascular treatment is effective for extradural arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs), intradural ventral (perimedullary) AVMs, and intramedullary spinal AVMs. Treatment of intradural dorsal (dural) AVFs remains largely surgical because of lower recurrence rates, although recent studies demonstrate equivocal outcomes. Extradural-intradural (juvenile) AVMs and conus AVMs remain difficult-to-treat lesions.

Cervical Radiculopathy Caused by Spinal Epidural Arteriovenous Fistula (SEDAVF) Without Intradural Drainage: A Case Report and Literature Review

Spinal epidural arteriovenous fistula (SEDAVF) is a rare vascular malformation. Due to the mass effect of enlarged epidural veins and venous hypertension, progressive radiculopathy and myelopathy are likely to occur. A 33-year-old female presented with right upper extremity weakness for a month. The cause of this symptom was a SEDAVF, which was located near the C5-6-7 foramens and compressed the nerve roots. In the absence of intradural venous drainage, endovascular treatment is often difficult because of the large venous pouch. We performed endovascular trapping of the vertebral artery (VA) and loose packing of the coil material on the AVF to minimize mass effects. Immediately after embolization, the fistula was occluded, but a small new feeder vessel developed a day later. An n-butyl cyanoacrylate embolization was performed, and the fistula was successfully occluded.

Embolization Tactics of Spinal Epidural Arteriovenous Fistulas

Purpose

Spinal epidural arteriovenous fistulas (SEDAVFs) show an epidural venous sac often with venous congestive myelopathy (VCM) due to intradural reflux at a remote level to which a transarterial approach would be difficult. We present 12 cases of SEDAVF with VCM and describe 3 main tactics for effective transarterial embolization.

Materials and Methods

Among 152 patients with spinal vascular malformations diagnosed in our tertiary hospital between 1993 and 2019, 12 SEDAVF patients with VCM were included. Three different transarterial embolization tactics were applied according to the vascular configuration and microcatheter accessibility. We evaluated treatment results and clinical outcomes before and after treatment.

Results

Transarterial embolization with glue (20–30%) was performed in all patients. The embolization tactics applied in 12 patients were preferential flow (n=2), plug-and-push (n=6), and filling of the venous sac (n=4). Total occlusion of the SEDAVF, including intradural reflux, was achieved in 11 (91.7%) of 12 patients, and partial occlusion was achieved in 1 patient. No periprocedural complications were reported. Spinal cord edema was improved in all patients for an average of 18 months after treatment. Clinical functional outcome in terms of the pain, sensory, motor, and sphincter scale and modified Rankin scores improved during a mean 25-month follow-up (6.3 vs. 3.3, P=0.002; 3.6 vs. 2.3, P=0.002, respectively).

Conclusion

Endovascular treatment for 12 SEDAVF patients with VCM achieved a total occlusion rate of 91.7% without any periprocedural complication. The combined embolization tactics can block intradural reflux causing VCM, resulting in overall good clinical outcomes.

Natural History and Clinical Outcomes of Paravertebral Arteriovenous Shunts

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Paravertebral arteriovenous shunts (PVAVSs) are rare. Whether the intradural venous system is involved in drainage may lead to differences in clinical characteristics through specific pathophysiological mechanisms. This study aims to comprehensively evaluate the natural history and clinical outcomes of PVAVSs with or without intradural drainage.

METHODS

Sixty-four consecutive patients with PVAVSs from 2 institutes were retrospectively reviewed. Lesions were classified as type A (n=28) if the intradural veins were involved in drainage; otherwise, they were classified as type B (n=36). The clinical course from initial presentation to the last follow-up was analyzed.

RESULTS

The patients with type A shunts were older at presentation (52.5 versus 35.5 years, P<0.0001) and more likely to have lower spinal segments affected than patients with type B PVAVSs (67.8% versus 13.9%, P=0.00006). After presentation, the deterioration rates related to gait and sphincter dysfunction were significantly higher in patients with type A than type B shunts (gait dysfunction: 71.8%/y versus 17.0%/y, P=0.0006; sphincter dysfunction: 63.7%/y versus 11.3%/y, P=0.0002). According to the angiogram at the end of the latest treatment, 79% of type A and 75% of type B PVAVSs were completely obliterated. If the lesions were partially obliterated, a significantly higher clinical deterioration rate was observed in patients with type A shunts than those with type B shunts (69.9%/y versus 3.2%/y, P=0.0253).

CONCLUSIONS

Type A PVAVSs feature rapid progressive neurological deficits; therefore, early clinical intervention is necessary. For complex lesions that cannot be completely obliterated, surgical disconnection of all refluxed radicular veins is suggested.

Challenges in Diagnosis and Management of Previously Embolized Spinal Dural Arteriovenous Fistulae

BACKGROUND

Given the growing prevalence of initial endovascular treatment for type 1 spinal dural arteriovenous fistulae (dAVF), there are an increasing number of patients presenting with progressive symptoms related to recurrent previously embolized spinal dAVF. This study's goal was to identify demographic, clinical, and radiographic variables among patients who have failed embolization of type I spinal dAVF.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 24 consecutive surgeries for type I spinal dAVF performed by the senior author (A.D.L.) identified 5 patients who underwent open surgery for failed embolization. These 5 cases were reviewed for location of fistula, time from embolization to recurrence, preoperative functional status, fistulous point encountered at surgery, and clinical outcome of the patient at 3-month follow-up. A representative example case is reviewed in detail.

RESULTS

The median age at time of recurrence was 63 years (range 51-73 years). The median timing of embolization to recurrence of neurologic symptoms was 5 months (range 1-54) and to surgery 7 months (range 2-60 months). The level of the spinal dAVF was most frequently at T12-L1 (n = 3). Spinal magnetic resonance arteriography led to localization of the spinal dAVF in 2 patients and spinal catheter angiogram in 3 cases. All patients had definitive radiographic cure of the dAVF at last clinical follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

The increased use of endovascular treatment of spinal dAVF has led to the treatment of refractory cases with a greater degree of surgical complexity. Open surgical ligation continues to provide the most definitive treatment outcomes for this complex spinal vascular entity.

Spinal epidural arteriovenous fistula with intradural venous reflux: The possibility of acquired origin caused by spinal stenosis and/or disc herniation

BACKGROUND

Spinal epidural arteriovenous fistulas (SEAVFs) are relative rare lesions. The pathogenesis of these fistulas remains unclear. Our aim is to review cases of SEAVFs at our institution.

METHODS

We reviewed a consecutive series of spinal vascular disease at our institution and collected all patients harboring SEAVFs. Medical charts were retrospectively reviewed regarding patient demographic data (i.e., gender and age), presenting symptoms and signs, previous history of spinal surgery or trauma, treatment methods, and neurological outcome after treatment. All image studies, including plain radiography, spinal MRI, MRA, and angiography were analyzed.

RESULTS

We identified 9 cases of lumbosacral SEAVFs with intradural venous reflux treated at our institution from June 2010 to August 2020. Their median age was 67 years, range 52-83 years. Only one patient had a history of trauma. Interestingly, our observations found that all fistulas are associated with spinal stenosis and/or disc herniation. An additional literature search about SEAVFs coexisting with spinal stenosis and/or disc herniation was performed and found another 19 cases with median age 69 years, range 39-83 years. Only 2 patients had a history of previous spinal surgery. The level of shunted pouch in all 28 patients was correlated with the level of spinal canal stenosis and/or disc herniation.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study may provide an additional evidence supporting an acquired etiology of SEAVFs, which mainly manifest in late adulthood. It is possible that spinal stenosis and/or disc herniation may result in thrombosis or impairment of venous drainage, causing increased venous pressure, leading to fistulous formation.

Clinical and Imaging Characteristics of Spinal Dural Arteriovenous Fistulas and Spinal Epidural Arteriovenous Fistulas

BACKGROUND

Spinal epidural arteriovenous fistulas (SEDAVFs) are an increasingly recognized form of spinal vascular malformation and are distinct from spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas (SDAVFs). Differentiating between these 2 entities is important as operative strategies often differ based on angioarchitecture.

OBJECTIVE

To compare demographic, clinical, anatomic, and imaging findings of SDAVFs and SEDAVFs.

METHODS

Consecutive patients diagnosed and/or treated for SDAVF or SEDAVF at our institution between January 2000 and November 2018 were included. Data were collected on demographics, clinical presentation, and imaging findings. All cross-sectional and angiographic imaging were reviewed. To compare continuous variables, t-test was used Chi-squared was used for categorical variables.

RESULTS

A total of 169 patients were included. In total 47 patients had SEDAVFs and 122 patients had SDVAFs. Clinical presentation and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) imaging findings were similar between the 2 groups. SEDAVF patients were significantly more likely to have an epidural venous pouch on gadolinium bolus MR angiography (MRA) (0.0% vs 92.1%, P < .0001). SEDAVFs were more commonly located in the lumbar and sacral spine than SDAVFs (85.1% vs 34.4%, P < .0001). When in the lumbar spine, SEDAVFs unlike SDAVFs were more likely to involve the most caudal segments (L4 and L5, P = .02).

CONCLUSION

SEDAVF share clinical and radiological findings similar to SDAVFS, including high T2 cord signal, cord enhancement, and perimedullary flow voids on conventional MRI. However, they have a characteristic appearance on spinal MRA and DSA with a pouch of epidural contrast. SEDAVFs are more commonly located in the lumbosacral spine.

Spontaneous Spinal Osseous Epidural Arteriovenous Fistula with Long Segments of Prominent Epidural Venous Drainage Causing Severe Compressive Thoracic Myelopathy Successfully Treated with Combined Endovascular and Surgical Treatments: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

The authors describe an extremely rare case of spinal osseous epidural arteriovenous fistulas (SOEAVFs) with unique characteristic features. A 25-year-old man presented with progressive weakness and paresthesia of the lower extremities for 1 month. Magnetic resonance imaging of the thoracic spine showed an extradural dilated vascular flow void structure extending from T4 to T8 levels with abnormal hyperintense T2 signal from T6 to T8 levels. Magnetic resonance angiography and spinal angiography revealed unique features of SOEAVF supplied by multiple small arterial feeders of intercostal arteries converging into a dilated round venous sac corresponding to a bony defect of T7 lamina and spinous process. The venous drainage directly drained into prominent epidural venous plexus extending from the level of T4 to T8 without intradural venous drainage, causing severe compressive myelopathy. Transarterial embolization was performed using N-butyl cyanoacrylate through the main feeder. Subsequently, he successfully underwent laminectomy and total excision of the fistula and large epidural draining venous plexus. Histopathology confirmed spinal vascular malformations with evidence of previous embolization. He gradually improved until being ability to walk independently 3 months later. Follow-up spinal angiography confirmed complete resection of SOEAVF. The patient has remained clinically asymptomatic 5 years after operation.

Posttraumatic Vertebral Arteriovenous Fistula: A Lifeline from Tetraplegia?

BACKGROUND

Vertebral artery (VA) rupture is a rare condition that occurs about in 0.5% of cervical trauma. The management of our case was complicated by a spinal epidural hematoma (SEH) leading to worsening neurologic deficits. Only 1 similar case has been reported before in the literature.

CASE DESCRIPTION

We report the case of a 37-year-old victim of a serious car accident. Shortly after admission to the emergency department, she developed weakness in all 4 limbs and sensory deficit below T6 level. Cervical spine computed tomography scan revealed an SEH from C1 to T3. Computed tomography angiography scan showed rupture of the left VA at C3 level, with a posttraumatic vertebral arteriovenous fistula at the same level, draining in the epidural venous plexus and to the right jugular internal vein. Immediately after embolization of the left VA, we performed a cervical decompression from C2 to C7. Three months after surgery the patient had a full recovery.

CONCLUSIONS

No guidelines exist to treat this situation. We propose consequential steps to treat a posttraumatic cervical SEH with evidence of VA rupture.

Microsurgical versus endovascular treatment of spinal epidural arteriovenous fistulas with intradural venous drainage: a multicenter study of 81 patients

OBJECTIVE

Spinal arteriovenous shunts are rare vascular lesions and are classified into 4 types (types I-IV). Due to rapid advances in neuroimaging, spinal epidural AVFs (edAVFs), which are similar to type I spinal dural AVFs (dAVFs), have recently been increasingly reported. These 2 entities have several important differences that influence the treatment strategy selected. The purposes of the present study were to compare angiographic and clinical differences between edAVFs and dAVFs and to provide treatment strategies for edAVFs based on a multicenter cohort.

METHODS

A total of 280 consecutive patients with thoracic and lumbosacral spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas (dAVFs) and edAVFs with intradural venous drainage were collected from 19 centers. After angiographic and clinical comparisons, the treatment failure rate by procedure, risk factors for treatment failure, and neurological outcomes were statistically analyzed in edAVF cases.

RESULTS

Final diagnoses after an angiographic review included 199 dAVFs and 81 edAVFs. At individual centers, 29 patients (36%) with edAVFs were misdiagnosed with dAVFs. Spinal edAVFs were commonly fed by multiple feeding arteries (54%) shunted into a single or multiple intradural vein(s) (91% and 9%) through a dilated epidural venous plexus. Preoperative modified Rankin Scale (mRS) and Aminoff-Logue gait and micturition grades were worse in patients with edAVFs than in those with dAVFs. Among the microsurgical (n = 42), endovascular (n = 36), and combined (n = 3) treatment groups of edAVFs, the treatment failure rate was significantly higher in the index endovascular treatment group (7.5%, 31%, and 0%, respectively). Endovascular treatment was found to be associated with significantly higher odds of initial treatment failure (OR 5.72, 95% CI 1.45-22.6). In edAVFs, the independent risk factor for treatment failure after microsurgery was the number of intradural draining veins (OR 17.9, 95% CI 1.56-207), while that for treatment failure after the endovascular treatment was the number of feeders (OR 4.11, 95% CI 1.23-13.8). Postoperatively, mRS score and Aminoff-Logue gait and micturition grades significantly improved in edAVFs with a median follow-up of 31 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Spinal epidural AVFs with intradural venous drainage are a distinct entity and may be classified as type V spinal vascular malformations. Based on the largest multicenter cohort, this study showed that primary microsurgery was superior to endovascular treatment for initial treatment success in patients with spinal edAVFs.