The WOVEN trial: Wingspan One-year Vascular Events and Neurologic Outcomes

Long-Term Outcome of Rescue Stenting for Acute Intracranial Atherosclerotic Stenosis-Related Large Vessel Occlusion in the Anterior Circulation

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Rescue stent (RS) is an accepted rescue option after failed mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for acute ischemic stroke due to intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS)-related large vessel occlusion (LVO). However, the long-term outcomes (≥12 months) of RS have not yet been elucidated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the data of 154 patients with RS for ICAS-related LVO, which were identified from a prospectively maintained multicenter database of RS after MT failure, to assess good outcome (mRS 0-2), mortality, stroke recurrence, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (SICH), and stent patency.

RESULTS

Among 154 patients, successful recanalization was achieved in 132 (85.7%) after RS. Clinical follow-up was available in 148 patients at 3 months, of whom 126 were followed longer than 12 months. Good outcome was observed in 53.4% (79/148) at 3 months and 53.2% (67/126) at the final assessment among survivors (median, 33; interquartile range [IQR], 13-91 months). The overall incidence of mortality was 16.2% (24/148). Mortality occurred in 8.8% (13/148) of patients at 3 months and 8.7% (11/126) thereafter, respectively. Stroke recurrence was 0.7% (1/148) within 3 months and 3.2% (4/126) thereafter. The overall incidence of SICH was 9.5% (14/148). SICH occurred in 8.8% (13/148) within the first 3 months and in 0.8% (1/126) thereafter. The stented vessel was patent in 81.1% (99/122) at the first follow-up (median, 3; IQR, 1-125 months) and 96.7% (89/92) at the final follow-up (median, 18; IQR, 13-68 months).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with RS for ICAS-LVO showed a low stroke recurrence rate in the long-term. The long-term patency of RS appears to remain durable, particularly when it remained patent during the initial follow-up.

Intracranial stenting with the Neuroform Atlas Stent for symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis: a bi-center retrospective analysis including stroke recurrence nomogram

Background

Intracranial stenting with the Neuroform Atlas Stent is an emerging option for patients with symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (sICAS) who do not respond to intensive medical treatment. However, the efficacy, safety, and risk factors associated with postoperative stroke recurrence remain controversial.

Methods

A total of 326 consecutive patients with sICAS treated with intracranial stenting using the Neuroform Atlas Stent were retrospectively analyzed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the procedure. Patients were randomly assigned to a training set and a validation set in a 7:3 ratio. Significant variables in the univariate logistic analyses were included in the final multivariate logistic regression analyses in the training set. Subsequently, we developed a predictive nomogram for sICAS treated with a Neuroform Atlas Stent to predict the likelihood of stroke recurrence at 6 months.

Results

The overall mean stenosis rate of the target artery was 88.85% ± 6.53% before the stenting (T0), 47.58% ± 9.94% at the end of the procedure (T1), and 40.21% ± 7.77% at the 6-month follow-up (T2). The stenosis rate was statistically significant between T0 and T1 (p < 0.01) and between T0 and T2 (p < 0.01). At 6 months postoperatively, 36 patients had a stroke recurrence linked to the target artery. Diabetes, acute ischemic stroke (AIS), plaque burden on vessel wall MRI, enhancement ratio on vessel wall MRI, and stenosis (T1) were independent predictors of stroke recurrence. A predictive nomogram was developed, showing strong predictive capability with the area under the curve of 0.933 for the training set and 0.949 for the validation set.

Conclusion

Intracranial stenting with the Neuroform Atlas Stent is a potentially safe and effective treatment for sICAS. Risk factors for recurrent stroke post-procedure include diabetes, current smoker, current drinker, AIS, plaque burden, enhancement ratio, and stenosis (T1).

Comparison of safety and efficacy of different endovascular treatments for symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis: results from a single center

Background

Symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (sICAS) is one of the common causes of ischemic stroke. However, the treatment of sICAS has remained a challenge in the past with unfavorable findings. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of different endovascular treatment methods for sICAS.

Methods

The study involved 154 patients with sICAS who received endovascular treatment at Qingdao University Hospital between January 2021 and October 2023. Based on the characteristics of the lesions, three different types of treatments were performed: bare metal stent group (BMS group), drug-coated balloon group (DCB group), and drug-eluting stent group (DES group). The primary endpoints included the incidence of in-stent restenosis (ISR) in the 6-month, periprocedural complications, the rate of stroke recurrence in the area of the stented artery during the follow-up period, and modified Rankin score (mRS) at discharge, at 1-month, at 3-month, at 6-month of patients after stenting.

Results

The incidence of perioperative complications did not differ significantly between groups (11.3% in the BMS group, 8.0% in the DCB group, and 6.1% in the DES group, p = 0.776). All patients (154/154) had successful reperfusion after endovascular treatment. The incidence of stroke during follow-up was 4.5% (7/154), with 5 (7.0%) patients in the BMS group, 1 (2.0%) patient in the DCB group, and 1 (3.0%) patient in the DES group. The restenosis rate in the BMS group [35.2% (25/71)] tended to be higher than that in the DCB group [6.0% (3/50)] and DES group [9.1% (3/33)]. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, endovascular treatment strategy and vessel distribution were significant independent risk factors for ISR within 6 months (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

Adverse events and success rates following stent implantation are comparable across therapy groups in individuals with sICAS. When compared to BMS, DES, and DCB reduce the risk of ISR, with the advantages of the DCB appearing to be greater for some high-risk patients with ICAS.

A New Fibrin-Heparine Coated Self-Expanding Stent for the Rescue Treatment of Intracranial Stenosis-a Multicentric Study

INTRODUCTION

Rescue intracranial stenting is necessary to provide sufficient recanalization after mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in patients with acute large vessel occlusions (LVO) due to an underlying intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD). The CREDO heal is a novel stent that provides a potentially lower thrombogenicity due to surface modification. We present the first multicentric experience with the CREDO heal for acute rescue stenting.

METHODS

Data of 81 patients who underwent rescue stenting after MT at 12 centers in Germany and Spain were prospectively collected and retrospectively evaluated.

RESULTS

Final mTICI 2b‑3 was reached in 95.1% after median two MT maneuvers and stenting. Four periprocedural complications resulted in clinical deterioration (4.9%). Intraparenchymal hemorrhage occurred in one patient (1.2%) and functional independence at FU was reached by 42% of the patients. Most interventions were performed under Gp IIb/IIIa inhibitors.

CONCLUSION

CREDO heal was effective and safe in our case series. However, more data is needed to define the optimal antithrombotic regime. The use under single antiplatelet medication is not supported by our study.

Stenting versus medical treatment alone for symptomatic intracranial artery stenosis: a preplanned pooled individual patient data analysis

BACKGROUND

Whether the safety and efficacy of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting (PTAS) is significantly different from that of medical treatment alone for symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis (ICAS) is debatable. A study was undertaken to determine the safety and efficacy of both treatments for symptomatic ICAS.

METHODS

This preplanned pooled individual patient data analysis included 400 participants treated with PTAS and 409 treated with medical treatment alone in two large multicenter randomized clinical trials (SAMMPRIS and CASSISS). Patients were treated with PTAS using a self-expanding stent or medical treatment alone. The primary outcome was stroke or death within 30 days, or ischemic stroke in the territory of the qualifying artery more than 30 days after enrollment.

RESULTS

Individual data were obtained for 809 patients, 451 from SAMMPRIS and 358 from CASSISS. 400 participants were randomly assigned to the PTAS group and 409 to the medical group. The risk of the primary outcome was not significant between the PTAS and medical groups (17.5% vs 13.2%; HR 1.37 (95% CI 0.96 to 1.95), P=0.08). However, the risk of stroke or death within 30 days was higher in the PTAS group (10.5% vs 4.2%; HR 2.62 (95% CI 1.49 to 4.61), P<0.001). Patients of white ethnicity (HR 1.97, 95% CI 1.17 to 3.31) and those with hyperlipidemia (HR 2.04, 95% CI 1.27 to 3.26) or a transient ischemic attack (TIA) (HR 2.19, 95% CI 1.08 to 4.45) were at higher risk for PTAS.

CONCLUSIONS

PTAS poses an increased risk of short-term stroke/death and therefore is not advised as primary treatment for symptomatic ICAS. A balance exists between stroke risks and revascularization benefits. For patients with asymptomatic ICAS of white ethnicity and those with hyperlipidemia or a history of TIA, a thorough assessment is warranted before considering PTAS.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00576693, NCT01763320.

Demographic Characteristics and Treatment Outcomes of Intracranial Atherosclerosis Stenting: A Retrospective Case-Series of 216 Consecutive Patients

Background/Objectives: Intracranial atherosclerosis (ICAS) is a major cause of ischemic stroke, disproportionately affecting populations with significant vascular risk factors. Although ICAS imposes a considerable health burden, research on this condition in Central Asia remains scarce, especially among the Kazakh population. This study analyzes demographic characteristics, treatment outcomes, and procedural challenges associated with ICAS in 216 patients treated at a single institution. Methods: This retrospective study included patients with ≥70% intracranial artery stenosis confirmed by imaging and presenting with ischemic symptoms. All patients underwent angioplasty and stenting with dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). Data collected included demographics, comorbidities, stenosis characteristics, procedural details, and outcomes assessed by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). Results: The median age was 63.5 years (IQR: 57-68.6), and 73.7% were male. Hypertension was the most common comorbidity (98%), followed by ischemic heart disease (58%) and diabetes mellitus (40.9%). Multi-location ICAS was significantly associated with patients over 75 years of age (p = 0.025). Additionally, obesity and stenosis severity greater than 70% showed trends toward significance, with p-values of 0.064 and 0.079, respectively. Stenosis predominantly affected the internal carotid artery (54.5%) and vertebrobasilar system (31.6%). The average hospital stay was longer for posterior circulation stenosis (7.1 days) compared to anterior circulation (4.7 days). The periprocedural complication rate was 0.7%, with two deaths attributed to ischemic complications. At follow-up, four patients experienced worsening mRS scores (>2), particularly those with severe stenosis in the basilar artery and M1 segment. Conclusions: ICAS in the Kazakh population is strongly associated with hypertension and aging, with posterior circulation stenosis contributing disproportionately to worse outcomes. The low complication rates highlight the safety of modern endovascular techniques. However, further research is needed to optimize treatment strategies for severe and multi-location ICAS, particularly in Central Asian populations.

Use of a large-bore 088 intracranial access support catheter for delivery of large intracranial devices: case series with the TracStar LDP in 125 cases

BACKGROUND

The delivery of neuroendovascular devices requires a robust proximal access platform. This demand has previously been met with a 6Fr long sheath (8Fr guide) that is placed in the proximal internal carotid artery (ICA) or vertebral artery segments. We share our experience with the first 0.088 inch 8Fr guide catheter designed for direct intracranial access.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed a prospectively maintained IRB-approved institutional database of the senior authors to identify all cases where the TracStar Large Distal Platform (LDP) was positioned within the intracranial vasculature, defined as within or distal to the petrous ICA, vertebral artery (V3) segments, or transverse sinus. Technical success was defined as safe placement of the TracStar LDP within or distal to the described distal vessel segments with subsequent complication-free device implantation.

RESULTS

Over the 41-month study period from January 2020 to June 2023, 125 consecutive cases were identified in whom the TracStar LDP was navigated into the intracranial vasculature for triaxial delivery of large devices, 0.027 inch microcatheter and greater, for aneurysm treatment (n=108, 86%), intracranial angioplasty/stenting (n=15, 12%), and venous sinus stenting (n=2, 1.6%). All cases used a direct select catheter technique for initial guide placement (no exchange). Posterior circulation treatments occurred in 14.4% (n=18) of cases. Technical success was achieved in 100% of cases. No vessel dissections occurred in any cases.

CONCLUSION

The TracStar LDP is an 0.088 inch 8Fr guide catheter that can establish direct intracranial access with an acceptable safety profile. This can be achieved in a wide range of neurointerventional cases with a high rate of technical success.

Predictors and Outcomes of Periprocedural Intracranial Hemorrhage after Stenting for Symptomatic Intracranial Atherosclerotic Stenosis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Periprocedural intracranial hemorrhage is one of common complications after stent placement for symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis. This study was conducted to demonstrate predictors and long-term outcomes of periprocedural intracranial hemorrhage after stent placement for symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed patients with symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis stent placement in a prospective cohort at a high-volume stroke center. Clinical, radiologic, and periprocedural characteristics and long-term outcomes were reviewed. Periprocedural intracranial hemorrhage was classified as procedure-related hemorrhage (PRH) and non-procedure-related hemorrhage (NPRH). The long-term outcomes were compared between patients with PRH and NPRH, and the predictors of NPRH were explored.

RESULTS

Among 1849 patients, 24 (1.3%) had periprocedural intracranial hemorrhage, including PRH (4) and NPRH (20). The postprocedural 30-day mRS was 0-2 in 9 (37.5%) cases, 3-5 in 5 (20.8%) cases, and 6 in 10 (41.7%) cases. For the 14 survivors, the long-term (median of 78 months) mRS were 0-2 in 10 (76.9%) cases and 3-5 in 3 (23.1%) cases. The proportion of poor long-term outcomes (mRS ≥3) in patients with NPRH was significantly higher than those with PRH (68.4% versus 0%, P = .024). Anterior circulation (P = .002), high preprocedural stenosis rate (P < .001), and cerebral infarction within 30 days (P = .006) were independent predictors of NPRH after stent placement.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with NPRH had worse outcomes than those with PRH after stent placement for symptomatic ICAS. Anterior circulation, severe preprocedural stenosis, and recent infarction are independent predictors of NPRH.

Long-term outcome followed for more than 5 years after revascularization surgery for the treatment of atherosclerotic steno-occlusive disease: poor outcome prediction using machine learning and analysis of the results

Cerebral revascularization for the treatment of atherosclerotic steno-occlusive disease (ASOD) was found to have no benefit compared with medical treatment. However, there is also criticism that with sufficiently long-term follow-up, a crossover might emerge demonstrating the advantages of surgery. Therefore, we examined the long-term outcome of cerebral revascularization performed on patients with carefully selected ASOD at our center. Patients undergoing bypass surgery for non-moyamoya ischemic disease were retrospectively identified. The inclusion criteria were symptomatic ASOD with hemodynamic insufficiency, follow-up of more than 5 years, and stroke or surgical complications during follow-up. The clinical course and radiological findings were investigated. Poor outcomes were predicted using machine learning (ML) models, and Shapley additive explanation (SHAP) values and feature importance of each model were analyzed. A total of 109 patients were included from 2007 to 2018. The 30-day risk of any stroke or death was 6.4% (7/109). The risk of ipsilateral ischemic stroke during median follow-up of 116 months was 7.3% (8/109). The SHAP values showed that previously and empirically known stroke risk factors exert a relatively consistent effect on the prediction of models. The number of lesions with stenosis > 50% (odds ratio [OR] 5.77), age (OR 1.13), and coronary artery disease (OR 5.73) were consistent risk factors for poor outcome. We demonstrated an acceptable long-term outcome of cerebral revascularization surgery for patients with hemodynamically insufficient and symptomatic ASOD. Multicenter studies are encouraged to predict poor outcomes and suitable patients with large numbers of quantitative and qualitative data.

Arterial Lesion Location and Outcomes of Intracranial Atherosclerotic Disease

Intracranial atherosclerosis is a leading cause of stroke with a high recurrence rate despite treatment. Numerous factors are proposed to influence stroke recurrence due to intracranial atherosclerosis including lesion eccentricity, plaque characteristics, and computational fluid dynamic metrics, such as wall shear stress. An overlooked variable that intrinsically relates to intracranial atherosclerosis is the location of the arterial segment where the lesion occurs. Variations in cerebral blood flow, arterial anatomy, and flow dynamics are likely drivers of initial lesion development and thus likely to influence stroke recurrence. To date, treatment trials of intracranial atherosclerosis have not considered arterial segment lesion location as an independent variable, failing to account for variations in flow dynamics between each artery. There are limited available data on differences between arterial segments, confined to only post hoc analyses. In this review, we summarize available data on such differences between arterial segments. With the limited arterial segment data available, multiple differences in recurrence of stroke in territory of lesion were identified across trials.

Hemodynamic Impairments of Evaluating Symptomatic Intracranial Atherosclerotic Stenosis using Quantitative Flow Ratio on Digital Subtraction Angiography : A Comparison with Computed Tomography Perfusion, MRI and Fractional Flow Reserve

PURPOSE

Cerebral hemodynamics are important for the management of intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS). The quantitative flow ratio (QFR) is a novel angiography-derived index for assessing the functional relevance of ICAS without pressure wires and adenosine. Good diagnostic yield with the hyperemic fractional flow reserve (FFR) have been reported, while data on the comparison of QFR to FFR are scarce.

METHODS

In this prospective study 56 patients with anterior circulation symptomatic ICAS who received endovascular treatment were included. The new method of computing QFR from a single angiographic view, i.e., the Murray law-based QFR (μQFR), was applied to the examined vessels. An artificial intelligence algorithm was developed to realize the automatic delineation of vascular contour. Pressure gradients were measured before and after treatment within the lesion vessel using a pressure guidewire and the FFR was calculated.

RESULTS

There was a good correlation between μQFR and FFR. Preoperative FFR predicted DWI watershed infarction (FFR optimal cut-off level: 0.755). Preoperative μQFR predicted DWI watershed infarction (μQFR optimal cut-off level: 0.51). Preoperative FFR predicted CTP hypoperfusion (FFR best predictive value: 0.62). Preoperative μQFR predicted CTP hypoperfusion (μQFR best predictive value: 0.375).

CONCLUSION

The μQFR based on DSA images can be used as an indicator to assess the functional status of the lesion in patients with ICAS.

Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting for severe stenosis of the intracranial carotid artery and its branches: Comparison of the Wingspan stent vs the Credo stent

BACKGROUND

Despite the widespread use of the Wingspan stent system for treating severe medically refractory intracranial artery stenosis (SMR-ICAS), a new Credo stent system was approved because it could integrate stent delivery within the balloon catheter. However, the therapeutic outcomes of these two systems have not been compared. This preliminary study aimed to compare the results of percutaneous angioplasty and stenting (PTAS) in SMR-ICAS patients treated with either Wingspan or Credo stents within the anterior cerebral circulation.

METHODS

SMR-ICAS patients with >70% stenosis in the anterior circulation who underwent PTAS using either the Wingspan or Credo stent system were retrospectively analyzed. We evaluated the technical success, safety, and outcomes of the two-stent systems.

RESULTS

A total of 29 patients were analyzed, including 17 patients treated with Wingspan stents and 12 with Credo stents. The outcomes of the Wingspan stent vs Credo stent were as follows: technical success (16/17 [94%] vs 11/12 [92%], p = 1.00); periprocedural intracranial hemorrhage (2/17 [12%] vs 0/12 [0%], p = 0.50); silent embolic ischemic lesions on periprocedural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (13/17 [76%] vs 7/12 [58%], p = 0.42); and significant (>50%) in-stent restenosis in 1 year (4/17 [24%] vs 2/12 [17%], p = 1.00). No recurrent stroke or mortality was noted within 30 days after the procedures or during the 1-year follow-up period.

CONCLUSION

The technical success, safety, and outcomes of the Credo stent system were comparable to those of the Wingspan stent system in the management of SMR-ICAS patients. Further large-scale studies are warranted to substantiate these findings.

Comparison of the safety and efficacy of Neuroform Atlas stent deployed via Gateway balloon catheter and microcatheter for the treatment of intracranial stenosis

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of the Atlas stent released by the Gateway catheter and microcatheter in the treatment of intracranial stenosis (IS).

METHODS

The primary efficacy and safety outcomes were the in-stent restenosis (ISR) rate and post-procedural stroke or death within one month.

RESULTS

Atlas stents were deployed using the Gateway catheter and microcatheter in 19 (57.6 %) and 14 (42.4 %) procedures, respectively. Follow-up imaging data were available for 26 patients; the incidence of ISR was 15.4 %, and the ISR rate was higher, though not significantly, in the microcatheter group than in the Gateway group (30.0% vs. 6.25 %, P = .39). Clinical follow-up data were available for 30 patients; the post-procedural stroke rate was 3.3 % within one month and 13.3 % from one month to one year. The post-procedural stroke rate within one month was higher, though not significantly, in the microcatheter group than in the Gateway group (7.7% vs. 0 %, P = .43). The Gateway group had a significantly lower rate of post-procedural stroke in the same territory than that of the microcatheter group (0% vs. 30.8 %, P = .026). A higher incidence of residual stenosis <30 % was found in the non-ISR group than in the ISR group (72.2% vs. 0 %, P = .014).

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides preliminary evidence that the Atlas stent is safe and effective for IS treatment. The use of the Gateway catheter to deliver the Atlas stent appears to be safer than using microcatheter. The incidence of ISR may be related to the degree of the residual stenosis.

Comparing the Impact of Stenting vs. Medical Therapy for Intracranial Arterial Stenosis : A Systematic Review and One-stage and Two-stage Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

PURPOSE

In the treatment of intracranial arterial stenosis (ICAS), controversies remain regarding the optimal treatment strategy. Our study aims to conduct an individual patient-level data meta-analysis of existing RCTs comparing PTAS versus best medical therapy and to identify differences in outcomes such as incidence of ischemic stroke or death.

METHODS

Randomised controlled trials comparing the outcomes of stenting versus best medical therapy for patients who had symptomatic ICAS of >50%. Excluded studies included case reports, case series, reviews, observational studies,  letters or studies evaluating isolated angioplasty techniques without stenting. Data was extracted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines.

RESULTS

7 studies involving 1425 participants were included. There was an increased risk in the incidence of stroke and death within the first 30 days post-procedure for patients treated with PTAS over best medical therapy (RR = 2.22 [1.28-3.86], I² = 0%). Patients who underwent stenting also had a significantly higher risk of intracranial haemorrhage (RR = 12.66 [2.41-66.45], I² = 0%) and death (RR = 5.41 [1.20-24.28], I² = 0%).Under the shared frailty model, stenting when compared to medical therapy has a HR of 1.81 (95% CI:1.25-2.6) of stroke or death across 1 year. Under the parametric Royston-Parmar model, stenting has a significant decrease in the RMST(-0.83 months; 95% CI: -1.30-0.37). Stenting continued to show worse outcomes up to the 3 year mark with a HR of 1.60 (95% CI: 1.11-2.32).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

There is an increased risk of peri- and post-procedural stroke and death over best medical therapy in patients with symptomatic ICAS who undergo PTAS. Further work is required to refine patient selection and mitigate peri-procedural risks.

Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke: The Last 30 Years of Trials and Tribulations

The landscape of acute ischemic stroke management has undergone a substantial transformation over the past 3 decades, mirroring our enhanced comprehension of the pathology and progress in diagnostic techniques, therapeutic interventions, and preventive measures. The 1990s marked a pivotal moment in stroke care with the integration of intravenous thrombolytics. However, the most significant paradigm shift in recent years has undoubtedly been the advent of endovascular thrombectomy. This article endeavors to deliver an exhaustive analysis of this revolutionary progression.

Intracranial atherosclerosis update for neurointerventionalists

The management of intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD) has been evolving with advanced imaging, refinements of best medical treatment, and the development of endovascular options. There has been a significant increase in the use of endovascular therapy for symptomatic ICAD in the USA over the past 6 years. The rationale for this review is to update neurointerventionalists in these areas so that evidence-based decisions can be considered when counseling potential patients regarding their risks, benefits, and potential complications. The landmark SAMMPRIS trial demonstrated superiority of aggressive medical management (AMM) over intracranial stenting as an initial treatment. However, the risk of disabling or fatal stroke remains high in patients presenting with stroke treated with AMM. Recent studies showed a significantly lower rate of periprocedural complications from intracranial stenting. Patients who have failed medical treatment may therefore benefit from intracranial stenting, particularly in those with hemodynamic compromise and large vessel embolic stroke. Drug coated angioplasty balloons and drug eluting stents may potentially reduce the risk of in-stent re-stenosis. Large vessel occlusion (LVO) due to underlying ICAD is seen in a subset of thrombectomy-eligible patients. The use of stenting as a rescue therapy in LVO thrombectomy has also shown promising early results.

Antithrombotic Therapy in Carotid Artery and Intracranial Artery Stent

Optimal platelet inhibition is critical in patients with carotid and intracranial artery stenosis undergoing carotid artery stenting (CAS) and intracranial artery stenting (ICS). Many reports have highlighted the importance of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in reducing adverse neurological outcomes without a significant increase in bleeding complications during CAS. DAPT has commonly used CAS and ICS, typically with aspirin and clopidogrel, but clopidogrel resistance occurs in approximately 20% of Japanese and other Asian populations. One solution to clopidogrel resistance is using adjunctive cilostazol to suppress the frequency of stroke events and in-stent restenosis after CAS. Other antiplatelet agents such as prasugrel, ticagrelor, cangrelor, and glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitors are under investigation. The duration of DAPT after CAS remains controversial, as a longer duration of DAPT after CAS is associated with lower rates of readmission for stroke, but increased risk of hemorrhagic complications. Regarding antithrombotic therapy in CAS with concomitant atrial fibrillation, the use of direct oral anticoagulants plus a P2Y12 inhibitor may be suggested for the optimal safety and efficacy of antithrombotic management. For emergent CAS in acute ischemic stroke (AIS), intraprocedural DAPT loading and GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors, as necessary, may improve stent patency without increasing the risk of intracranial hemorrhage. In ICS, aggressive antiplatelet therapy based on an assessment of platelet aggregation is also important to improve clinical outcomes. In addition, rescue stenting for AIS caused by intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis-related large vessel occlusion is gaining attention. GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors have shown promise, but are not approved in Japan. In conclusion, DAPT is essential for the perioperative management of CAS and ICS. Specific perioperative antithrombotic management remains unclear, but the potential benefits of antithrombotic agents must be weighed against the corresponding increased risk of bleeding complications.

Angiography-based hemodynamic features predict recurrent ischemic events after angioplasty and stenting of intracranial vertebrobasilar atherosclerotic stenosis

OBJECTIVES

To assess the predictive value of hemodynamic features for stroke relapse in patients with intracranial vertebrobasilar atherosclerotic stenosis treated with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting (PTAS) using quantitative digital subtraction angiography (q-DSA).

METHODS

In this retrospective longitudinal study, patients with intracranial vertebrobasilar atherosclerotic stenosis and who underwent PTAS treatment between January 2012 and May 2020 were enrolled. The q-DSA assessment was performed before and after PTAS. ROIs 1-4 were placed along the vertebral artery, proximal and distal basilar artery, and posterior cerebral artery; ROIs 5-8 were in 5 mm and 10 mm proximal and distal to the lesion, respectively. Relative time to peak (rTTP) was defined as the difference in TTP between ROIs. Cox regression analyses were performed to determine risk factors for recurrent stroke.

RESULTS

A total of 137 patients (mean age, 62 years ± 10 [standard deviation], 83.2% males) were included, and 26 (19.0%) patients had stroke relapse during follow-up (median time of 42.6 months [interquartile range, 19.7-60.7]). Preprocedural rTTP4-1 (adjusted hazard ratio (HR) = 2.270; 95% CI 1.371-3.758; p = 0.001) and preprocedural rTTP8-5 (adjusted HR = 0.240; 95% CI 0.088-0.658; p = 0.006) were independently associated with the recurrent stroke. These hemodynamic parameters provided an incremental prognostic value for stroke relapse (AUC, 0.817 [0.704-0.931]; the net reclassification index, 0.431 [0.057-0.625]; and the integrated discrimination index, 0.140 [0.035-0.292]).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with intracranial vertebrobasilar atherosclerosis treated with PTAS, preprocedural prolonged TTP of the target vessel and shortened trans-stenotic TTP difference were associated with stroke relapse. Q-DSA-defined hemodynamic parameters provided incremental predictive value over conventional parameters for stroke recurrence.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Quantitative DSA analysis enables intuitive observation and semi-quantitative evaluation of peri-therapeutic cerebral blood flow. More importantly, quantitative DSA-defined hemodynamic parameters have the potential for risk stratification of patients with intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis.

KEY POINTS

Semi-quantitative angiography-based parameters can reflect pre- and postprocedural subtle changes in blood flow in patients with intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis. Although angioplasty procedures can significantly improve blood flow status, patients with more restricted baseline blood flow still show a higher risk of stroke recurrence. Angiography-based hemodynamic features possess prognostic value and can serve as clinical markers to assess stroke risk of patients with intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis.

Endovascular treatment of symptomatic severe intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis with a novel intracranial dedicated drug-eluting stent: a more effective treatment approach

BACKGROUND

Endovascular treatment of severe intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS) using coronary drug-eluting stents (DESs) significantly reduces the risk of in-stent restenosis (ISR) and stroke recurrence. However, there are few reports regarding the treatment of ICAS with intracranial dedicated DES. Herein, we present our experience with the feasibility, safety, and medium-term follow-up outcomes of a novel intracranial DES, named NOVA stent, in patients with symptomatic severe ICAS (≥70%).

METHODS

From December 2021 to May 2022, patients with symptomatic severe ICAS who underwent implantation of the NOVA stent in our institution were retrospectively analyzed for procedural results, perioperative complications, imaging and clinical follow-up outcomes.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients, 16 (66.7%) with anterior circulation lesions and 8 (33.3%) with posterior circulation lesions, were enrolled. All patients with intracranial ICA (n = 6), middle cerebral artery (n = 10), basilar artery (n = 3), intracranial vertebral artery (n = 3), and the vertebrobasilar junction (n = 2) stenosis were treated successfully using NOVA stents. The severity of stenosis ranged from 75 to 96% (mean 85.9%) before treatment and this was reduced to 0 to 20% (mean 8.6%) immediately after stent placement. Symptomatic distal embolism occurred in one case; however, there were no other perioperative complications. The mean follow-up duration was 12.2 ± 1.06 months. No symptomatic ischemic events occurred during follow-up. Follow-up cerebral angiography was performed in 22 of 24 patients (91.7%), and significant ISR occurred in one patient (4.2%).

CONCLUSION

Our results demonstrate that implantation of the novel intracranial DES NOVA in severe ICAS is feasible, safe, and effective in selected cases, reducing the incidence of ISR, and showing excellent midterm clinical outcomes, providing a promising option for ICAS treatment.

First-in-human experience of sirolimus coated balloon for symptomatic intracranial artery stenosis

BACKGROUND

The drug coated balloon is a promising endovascular therapy for intracranial atherosclerosis (ICAS), potentially combining the advantages of primary angioplasty and antiproliferative drugs. Previous studies have focused on the paclitaxel coated balloon, revealing promising outcomes in the treatment of ICAS, while concerns about the neurotoxicity of paclitaxel were reported. Sirolimus was shown to have less neurotoxicity in the canine cerebral vasculature. The feasibility and safety of a sirolimus coated balloon (SCB) for ICAS have never been evaluated in humans. We assessed the first-in-human feasibility and safety of SCBs for treating symptomatic patients with severe ICAS.

METHODS

This prospective, open label, single arm cohort study was designed to enroll patients with transient ischemic attacks or non-disabling, non-perforator territory ischemic stroke caused by severe ICAS (70-99%) and following at least 3 weeks after the onset of ischemic symptoms. The primary outcome was stroke or death within 30 days. All patients were followed up to detect restenosis at 6 months.

RESULTS

A total of 60 eligible patients were enrolled with an average age of 59.4±10.8 years. The technical success rate of SCBs for ICAS was 100%. Seven patients (11.7%) required stenting because of flow limited dissections or elastic retraction. Three patients (5.0%) had 30 day strokes, including two ischemic strokes and one hemorrhagic stroke. An additional three patients had recurrent stroke or death during follow-up. Ten patients had restenosis but only two had symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

SCBs may be feasible and safe in selected patients with symptomatic ICAS, with high grade stenosis (70-99%). Further studies are warranted.

Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty or stenting of petrous and cavernous internal carotid artery stenosis - a systematic review

Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) and stenting have been used for the treatment of internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis over the past two decades. A systematic review was performed to understand the efficacy of PTA and/or stenting for petrous and cavernous ICA stenosis. In total, 151 patients (mean age 64.9) met criteria for analysis, 117 (77.5%%) were male and 34 (22.5%) were female. Of the 151 patients, 35 of them (23.2%) had PTA, and 116 (76.8%) had endovascular stenting. Twenty-two patients had periprocedural complications. There was no significant difference in the complication rates between the PTA (14.3%) and stent (14.7%) groups. Distal embolism was the most common periprocedural complication. Average clinical follow up for 146 patients was 27.3 months. Eleven patients (7.5%) out of 146 had retreatment. The treatment of petrous and cavernous ICA with PTA and stenting has relatively significant procedure related complication rates and adequate long-term patency.

Randomized Secondary Prevention Trials in Participants With Symptomatic Intracranial Atherosclerotic Stenosis

Intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis is a prevalent cause of ischemic stroke worldwide. Its association with silent cerebral infarcts and its contribution to cognitive impairment and dementia emphasize the critical need for disease prevention and effective management strategies. Despite extensive research on secondary stroke prevention treatment over the past several decades, intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis continues to exhibit a notably higher recurrent stroke rate compared with other causes. This review focuses on randomized secondary prevention trials involving antithrombotic therapy, endovascular treatment, open surgical therapy, and remote ischemic conditioning. It aims to provide an insightful overview of the major findings from each trial and their implications for future research efforts.

The resolute Onyx drug eluting stent for neurointervention: A technical series

INTRODUCTION

Current methods for angioplasty and stenting of the intracranial vasculature for neurointervention are limited. The Wingspan Stent System is Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved with human device exemption for a limited patient group and despite numerous prospective registries and trials demonstrating reasonable safety, still carries warnings from the FDA for its use. Given these limitations, we present the technical nuances and outcomes of the off-label use of the Resolute Onyx drug-eluting stent (DES) for neurointerventional purposes.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review of all patients undergoing a neurointerventional procedure with the Resolute Onyx DES was done from January 2017-2021. The Resolute Onyx is a coronary balloon-mounted drug-eluting (zotarolimus) single wire laser cut stent. Technical details and procedural outcomes were collected.

RESULTS

In total 40 patients had attempted placement of the Resolute Onyx DES with procedural success in 95% of patients. The most common vessel stented was the basilar artery, 30% (12/40). The most common indication was intracranial atherosclerotic disease in 62.5% (25/40) patients, followed by acute stroke in 17.5% (7/40) of patients. The technical and procedural outcomes were excellent with only one technical complication (2.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

This series describes the initial technical safety and utility of utilizing a new generation balloon-mounted drug-eluting stent for neurointerventional purposes. This stent offers the potential for improved navigability, delivery, and outcomes compared to current neurointerventional options and warrants further study.

Comparison of drug-coated balloon with conventional balloon for angioplasty in symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis

BACKGROUND

Drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty has been studied for reducing the occurrence of restenosis after treatment for intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS), but no comparison has been published of the use of drug-coated and non-coated balloons in angioplasty for ICAS. We aim to compare the safety and efficacy of DCB angioplasty with conventional balloon (CB) angioplasty for the treatment of symptomatic ICAS.

METHODS

One hundred cases with symptomatic ICAS treated with DCB (n=49) and CB (n=51) angioplasty were retrospectively analyzed. 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) was completed to eliminate bias in the patients selected for further analysis. The periprocedural events and follow-up outcomes between the two groups were compared.

RESULTS

There were 32 cases in each group after PSM. Technical success (<50% residual stenosis) was achieved in 30 cases (93.8%) in the DCB group and in 28 cases (87.5%) in the CB group. The rates of stroke or mortality within 30 days were 3.1% in the DCB group and 6.3% in the CB group (p=1). The incidence of restenosis in the DCB group (6.3%) was significantly lower than that in the CB group (31.3%) (p=0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with CB angioplasty, DCB angioplasty can effectively reduce the incidence of restenosis. Further studies are needed to validate the role of DCB angioplasty in the management of symptomatic ICAS.

Short-term outcome of stenting with Enterprise stents for symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic disease at a single center

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of stenting for symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic severe stenosis or occlusion with Enterprise stents.

METHODS

Fifty-three consecutive patients with symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic severe (70%-99%) stenosis or occlusion who underwent endovascular treatment with Enterprise stents between September 2019 and March 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Primary outcomes included technical stenting success rates, the incidence of complications within 30 days of the procedure, and the in-stent restenosis rates during the follow-up period. These outcomes were further categorized based on lesion location and operation time.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven lesions in 53 patients aged 61.0 ± 10.0 years were treated with Enterprise stents with a technical success rate of 100%. Seven patients (12.3%) had severe complications within 30 days of the procedure: five had a symptomatic ischemic stroke, one had a symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage, and one had a subarachnoid hemorrhage related to the procedure. No deaths were observed. The rate of in-stent restenosis was 18.2%, with a mean vascular imaging follow-up period of 6.7 months. The 30-day complication and in-stent restenosis rates did not differ significantly between patients with different lesion locations and operation times (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

This retrospective study suggests that percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting with Enterprise stents is an effective treatment for symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis or occlusion with a high technical success rate. It also indicates that stenting during the early nonacute stage after stroke may not increase the incidence of perioperative complications for symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis when following strict inclusion criteria.

Resolute onyx stent more effective than wingspan stent at preventing procedural complications and long-term restenosis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Angioplasty and stenting is a treatment option for patients with medically refractory symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic disease (sICAD). Currently the Wingspan Stent System (WSS) is the only FDA approved device for this indication. We find the Resolute (R) Onyx Stent, a drug-eluting balloon mounted stent (DES), a better alternative to the WSS for treatment of sICAD. Herein, we present our findings comparing the two stents based on our single center experience.

METHODS

A prospectively maintained neuro-endovascular databased was queried for patients between January 2013 to June 2021. Inclusion criteria for patients included sICAD with failed medical management, and intracranial stenting with either R-Onyx DES or WSS, including patients treated within 7 days of their last stroke. Primary outcomes were assessed via the occurrence of ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke or death within 72 h of the procedure. Secondary outcomes consisted of recurrent stroke or significant in-stent restenosis evaluated by a clinical or angiographic follow-up at 6 months.

RESULTS

A total of 184 patients, average age 61.26 (SD = 12.53) (44% women), were eligible for analysis with 58 having R-onyx DES and 126 having WSS. Within 72 h, the primary outcome was observed in 1.7% (n = 1) of patients in the R-onyx DES group and 6.3% (n = 8) of patients in the WSS group (p = 0.089). Among 41 angiographic and clinical follow-ups in the R-onyx DES group, none had a recurrent stroke, while among 101 patients who had follow-up in the WSS group, 8.9% (n = 9) had a stroke (p = 0.024). At a 6-month angiographic follow-up, there was a significantly lower rate of symptomatic in-stent restenosis among the R-onyx DES group with 1.7% (n = 1) compared with 21.4% (n = 27) in the WSS group (p = 0.0003).

CONCLUSION

R-onyx DES is more effective than WSS in treating sICAD with low rates of periprocedural complications and long-term strokes and symptomatic in-stent restenosis. Future prospective randomized multicenter trials are needed.

Sub-satisfactory stenting recanalization of severe vascular stenosis of the posterior circulation can significantly improve cerebral hemodynamic perfusion

PURPOSE

To investigate the effect of sub-satisfactory stenting recanalization of severe vascular stenosis of the posterior circulation on cerebral hemodynamic perfusion.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with severe vascular stenosis of the posterior circulation who had undergone three-dimensional cerebral angiography before and after stenting were retrospectively enrolled. Computational fluid dynamic (CFD) analysis of hemodynamic parameters at the stenosis, perforating branch, and normal arterial segments proximal and distal to the stenosis were performed.

RESULTS

Sixty-two patients with basilar artery stenosis aged 60.9 ± 9.6 years were enrolled, and stent angioplasty resulted in the reduction of stenosis degree from 85.3 ± 7.2% before to 18.6 ± 6.4% after stenting. After stenting, at the proximal normal artery, the total pressures had significantly (P < 0.05) decreased, whereas all the other parameters (WSS, cell Reynolds number, velocity, vorticity, turbulence intensity, turbulence kinetic energy and dissipation rate) had significantly (P < 0.05) increased. At the stenosis, all hemodynamic parameters had significantly decreased. At the stenosis perforating branch, the WSS, cell Reynolds number, velocity, and vorticity were all significantly decreased, and the total pressure, turbulence intensity, kinetic energy, and dissipation rate were all significantly increased. At the distal normal artery, the total flow pressure (perfusion pressure) and velocity were both significantly (P < 0.05) increased, and the total pressure, WSS, cell Reynolds number, vorticity, turbulence intensity, kinetic energy, and dissipation rate were all significantly (P < 0.05) decreased. The hemodynamic parameters after stenting were closer to those after virtual stenosis repair at all measurements.

CONCLUSION

Sub-satisfactory recanalization has significantly restored the stenosis and improved the hemodynamic parameters near the stenosis and at the root of the perforating branch, thus significantly improving the cerebral perfusion, similar to the changes of hemodynamic status and cerebral perfusion after virtual removal of the vascular stenosis. This may indicate the good effect of sub-satisfactory stenting recanalization of the vascular stenosis at the posterior circulation.

Use of the neuroform atlas for stenting of intracranial atherosclerotic disease: Clinical and angiographic outcomes

BACKGROUND

Intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD) is a potential cause of ischemic stroke. Treatment of ICAD can include intracranial stenting. There are specifically designed stents for this use-case; however, less is known about the off-label use of the Neuroform Atlas stent. In this study, we describe the outcomes of the Neuroform Atlas stent for treatment of ICAD.

METHODS

Adult patients with symptomatic ICAD failing best medical treatment undergoing elective intracranial stenting using the Neuroform Atlas stent between November 2018 and March 2021 were included. Patient demographics, procedure-related details and clinical and imaging outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients met the inclusion criteria, with a mean follow-up duration of 9.6 ± 6.8 (standard deviation) months. There were two procedure-related mortalities (one massive intracranial hemorrhage and one groin site complication with sepsis). Fifteen patients were alive at the 6-month follow-up, all with satisfactory stent patency on follow-up imaging without any new ischemic events. Modified Rankin Scale at latest follow-up was 1.9 (interquartile range 5).

CONCLUSION

In this single-center consecutive series, intracranial stenting with the Neuroform Atlas stent was a safe and effective treatment for symptomatic ICAD patients failing best medical management.

Safety and efficacy of enterprise stenting for symptomatic atherosclerotic severe posterior circulation stenosis

PURPOSE

To investigate the safety and efficacy of Enterprise stent angioplasty and risk factors for the prognoses in treating symptomatic severe posterior circulation atherosclerotic stenosis (SSPCAS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with SSPCAS who were treated with the Enterprise stent angioplasty were retrospectively enrolled. The clinical data, peri-procedural complications, postoperative residual stenosis, in-stent restenosis and recurrent stroke at follow-up were analyzed.

RESULTS

262 patients with 275 stenotic lesions treated with the Enterprise stent angioplasty were enrolled. The stenosis degree was reduced from 86.3 ± 6.2% before to 19.3 ± 5.4% after stenting. Complications occurred in 14 (5.3%) patients. Clinical follow-up was performed in 245 (93.51%) patients for 16.5 ± 7.3 months. During 1 year follow-up, 7 patients (2.9%) had recurrent symptoms, including 4 patients with stenting in the intracranial vertebral artery and 3 in the basilar artery. Imaging follow-up was conducted in 223 (85.11%) patients. In-stent restenosis was present in 35 patients (15.7%), with the restenosis rate of 26.4% (n = 23) in the intracranial vertebral artery, which was significantly (P < 0.001) greater than in the basilar artery (8.8%). Six patients (17.1%) with in-stent restenosis were symptomatic. The stenotic length was the only significant (P = 0.026 and 0.024, respectively) independent risk factor for 1 year stroke or death events and in-stent restenosis.

CONCLUSION

The Enterprise stent can be safely and efficaciously applied in the treatment of symptomatic severe posterior circulation atherosclerotic stenosis, with a relatively low rate of in-stent restenosis and recurrent stroke within 1 year. The stenotic length was the only significant independent risk factor for 1 year stroke or death events and in-stent restenosis.

Balloon-mounting stent for intracranial arterial stenosis: A comprehensive and comparative systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

As one of the major causes of acute ischemic stroke, intracranial arterial stenosis necessitates an intervention that ranges from medical treatment to balloon angioplasty and stenting. Self-expandable stents (SES) and balloon-mounted stents (BMS) are two types of stents and their comparative efficacy and safety for intracranial stenosis are not well established.

METHODS

Studies that investigate balloon-mounted stenting for intracranial stenosis were extracted from PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane library. We sought to gather data on the success rate, change in mean arterial stenosis, and complications such as minor and major stroke and death (MMD), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, myocardial infarction, all-cause mortality, and in-stent re-stenosis.

RESULTS

3049 patients from 35 studies were included in this study. 20 studies investigated BMS alone and others compared BMS with SES. BMS was significantly more effective in reducing the degree of stenosis compared to SES (Difference in mean -5.953, CI 95% -7.727 to -4.179), had less complications compared to SES such as MMD (8.5% vs. 11.2%) and less in-stent re-stenosis (18.6% vs. 19.6%), but patients with SES experienced a lower rate of all-cause mortality(1.7% vs. 4.1%).

CONCLUSION

Intracranial stenting with BMS is more effective in reducing the degree of stenosis and has lower rates of complications when compared to SES.

Angioplasty And stenting For symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic disease: How I Do It

Intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD) is a common cause of acute ischemic stroke. ICAD has a high rate of recurrent ischemic stroke despite recommended adequate medical treatment. Endovascular treatment of ICAD has been controversial due to high periprocedural complication in historic randomized clinical trials (RCTs). Recently, a multicenter prospective study of stent placement in patients with high grade intracranial stenosis that evaluated safety and efficacy of Balloon-mounted stents (BMS) in symptomatic ICAD showed low rates of periprocedural stroke (5.6%) than the SAMMPRIS (14.7%) and VISSIT (21.4%) trials. This review highlights the recent evolution of endovascular therapy for symptomatic ICAD.

The 2023 Taiwan Stroke Society Guidelines for the management of patients with intracranial atherosclerotic disease

Intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD) is a major cause of ischemic stroke, especially in Asian populations, which has a high risk of recurrent stroke and cardiovascular comorbidities. The present guidelines aim to provide updated evidence-based recommendations for diagnosis and management of patients with ICAD. Taiwan Stroke Society guideline consensus group developed recommendations for management of patients with ICAD via consensus meetings based on updated evidences. Each proposed class of recommendation and level of evidence was approved by all members of the group. The guidelines cover six topics, including (1) epidemiology and diagnostic evaluation of ICAD, (2) nonpharmacological management of ICAD, (3) medical therapy for symptomatic ICAD, (4) endovascular thrombectomy and rescue therapy for acute ischemic stroke with underlying ICAD, (5) endovascular interventional therapy for postacute symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis, and (6) surgical treatment of chronic symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis. Intensive medical treatment including antiplatelet therapy, risk factor control, and life style modification are essential for patients with ICAD.

Novel usage of everolimus-eluting coronary stent for intracranial atherosclerotic disease: a technical report and case series

Objectives

This report describes the use of an Everolimus-eluting stent (Xience Skypoint stent) for the treatment of medically-refractory ICAD.

Design

Retrospective, case-series.

Setting

In-hospital patients.

Participants

All patients in this report had a history of stroke secondary to ICAD. All patients failed aggressive medical treatments and had recurrence of symptoms despite anticoagulation or dual-antiplatelet therapy plus a statin. Diagnostic angiogram in each case showed severe vessel stenosis, therefore patients were recommended for intracranial artery stenting.

Main outcome measures

Technical feasibility of deploying Xience Skypoint stent for treatmet of ICAD.

Results

The Xience Skypoint stent was safely and effectively deployed in the vertebral artery (x1) and the internal carotid artery (x2) using trans-ulnar (x1), trans-radial (x1), and trans-femoral (x1) approaches without the use of an intermediate catheter.

Conclusion

Second-generation EES such as Xience Skypoint may be utilized for treatment of medically-refractory ICAD. This technical report serves as a proof of concept for further studies analysing long-term safety and efficacy of such stents for treatment of ICAD.

Stenting versus medical therapy alone for symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis: protocol for a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS) is a common cause of stroke worldwide. However, whether the treatment options for symptomatic ICAS is stent placement or medical therapy alone is still controversial. At present, three multicentre randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have been published, but their research designs are also slightly different and the conclusions are not completely consistent. Therefore, we plan to conduct a systematic review and individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials to ascertain safety and efficacy of stenting versus medical therapy alone for symptomatic patients with intracranial arterial stenosis.

METHODS AND ANALYSES

We will identify RCTs comparing stenting vs medical therapy alone in patients with symptomatic ICAS stenosis (70%-99%) through a systematic search, mainly including PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library and ClinicalTrials.gov. Individual-level patient data for a prespecified list of variables will be sought from authors of all eligible studies. The primary outcome was a composite of stroke or death within 30 days, or stroke in territory of qualifying artery beyond 30 days after randomisation. IPD meta-analysis will be conducted with a one-stage approach.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval and individual patient consent will not be required in most cases since this IPD meta-analysis will use pseudoanonymised data from RCTs. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals and international conferences.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42022369922.

Extracranial-Intracranial Cerebral Revascularization for Atherosclerotic Vessel Occlusion: An Updated Systematic Review of the Literature

BACKGROUND

Atherosclerotic steno-occlusive cerebrovascular disease includes extracranial carotid occlusive and intracranial atherosclerotic disease. Despite the negative findings in Carotid Occlusion Surgery Study (COSS), many large centers continue to report favorable results for revascularization surgery in select groups of patients. The aim of our study was to perform an updated systematic review to investigate the role of revascularization surgery for atherosclerotic steno-occlusive patients in the modern era.

METHODS

Five independent reviewers performed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses-guided literature searches in October 2022 to identify articles reporting clinical outcomes in adult patients undergoing bypass for atherosclerotic steno-occlusive disease. Primary endpoints used were perioperative and long-term ischemic strokes, intracerebral hemorrhage, bypass patency, and favorable clinical outcomes. Study quality was evaluated with Newcastle-Ottawa, JADAD, and the Oxford Center for Evidence-Based Medicine scales.

RESULTS

A total of 6709 articles were identified in the initial search. Of these articles, 50 met the inclusion criteria and were included in the systematic review. A notable increase in the proportion of articles published over the past 10 years was observed. There were 6046 total patients with 4447 bypasses performed over the period from 1978 to 2022. The average length of follow-up was 2.75 ± 2.71 years. The average Newcastle-Ottawa was 6.23 out of 9 stars. There was a significant difference in perioperative stroke (odds ratio [OR], 0.65 [0.48-0.87]; P = 0.004), long-term ischemia (OR, 0.32 [0.23-0.44]; P < 0.0001), overall ischemia (OR, 0.36 [0.28-0.44]; P < 0.0001), and favorable outcomes (OR, 3.63 [2.84-4.64]; P < 0.0001) when comparing pre-COSS to post-COSS time frames in favor of post-COSS.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on a systematic review of 50 articles, the existing literature indicates that long-term stroke rates and favorable outcomes for surgical revascularization for steno-occlusive disease have improved over time and are lower than previously reported. Improved patient selection, perioperative care, and surgical techniques may contribute to improved outcomes.

Japanese Postmarket Surveillance of Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty and Wingspan Stenting for Intracranial Atherosclerotic Disease

BACKGROUND

The Wingspan stent system was approved as a rescue device for angioplasty of intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD) in 2012. We conducted the government-recommended Japanese Postmarket Surveillance of Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty and Wingspan Stenting for Intracranial Atherosclerotic Disease to monitor Wingspan safety and performance.

METHODS

In this open-label, single-arm study at 76 centers in Japan, ICAD subjects were treated with the Wingspan stent between 2014 and 2016. Efficacy end points were successful stent deployment and technical success, defined as stenosis improvement to <50%. Safety end points were ischemic stroke, modified Rankin Scale and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores, adverse events, and mortality. Subjects were considered treated outside of current recommendations if not already receiving antithrombotics or if percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting occurred within 7 days of onset.

RESULTS

The safety cohort included 305 subjects (mean age: 68.7 + 9.6; 83.3% male). Four subjects were removed due to being out of contract. Therefore, 301 subjects were included (mean age: 68.7 ± 9.7; 84.1% male). Successful stent placement was 96.7%. Technical success was observed in 86.8% of lesions. At 1 year, the rate of restenosis was 15.7%, ischemic stroke was 3.9%, and any stroke was 7.9%. Functionally independent outcome (modified Rankin Scale: 0-2) was 88.9% and mortality 3.0%. Significantly more serious adverse events occurred in subjects treated outside of current recommendations (17.9%) versus subjects treated per current recommendations (8.8%) (P = 0.045).

CONCLUSIONS

Endovascular treatment using the Wingspan stent for ICAD is safe and effective in the Japanese population.

Optional or optimal? off-label stenting for intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis: A scoping review

BACKGROUND

Intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis is a major cause of ischemic stroke. In addition to the Wingspan stent system, several self-expanding stents have been used off-label to treat intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis lesions. The purpose of this review is to assess the existing data on the off-label use of self-expanding stents in intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis, to highlight methodological limitations in current study designs, and thus providing strategies and precautions for clinical practice.

METHODS

The PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched for relevant articles published up to April 2022. In addition to the meta analysis of Enterprise, Neuroform EZ and closed cell stent respectively, we used a narrative synthesis to summarize and discuss the appropriate strategies and precautions for the use of each stent.

RESULTS

We identified 17 studies (1091 patients with 1124 lesions) reporting 6 types of off-label self-expanding stents. The most common endpoints reported were incidence of short-term complications (range: 0-15.8%, median: 3.8%), long-term complications (range: 0-12.0%, median: 0%). Potential risks include infeasibility of stenting hard lesions or tortuous vessels, stent migration, and in-stent thrombosis. Less is known about the conditions that are appropriate for an optimal stent (e.g., open-cell, close-cell, hybrid cell). There was considerable heterogeneity across studies with regards to study populations and study designs.

CONCLUSIONS

The potential risks and benefits should be carefully considered when using off-label stents for intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis, particularly given the current evidence power. As a potential option for the Wingspan stent, based on device's approval only, a tailored approach with lesion-specific devices could be beneficial in certain patients.

Impact of cerebral small vessel disease on symptomatic in-stent restenosis in intracranial atherosclerosis

OBJECTIVE

Cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD) commonly coexists with intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS). In-stent restenosis (ISR) affects the nonprocedural outcome of severe symptomatic ICAS after intracranial stenting. However, only 8%-27% of ISR patients are symptomatic, which highlights the importance of the investigation of risk factors associated with symptomatic ISR (SISR) to improve long-term functional outcome. Whether CSVD is associated with SISR remains unclear. The authors tested the hypothesis that CSVD is associated with SISR in ICAS patients after intracranial stenting.

METHODS

This retrospective study enrolled 97 patients who were symptomatic due to severe anterior circulation ICAS treated with intracranial stenting. SISR was evaluated with clinical and vascular imaging follow-up. CSVD subtypes, including white matter hyperintensities (WMHs), enlarged perivascular spaces, and chronic lacunar infarctions, were evaluated. Cox regression analysis was used to compare the incidence of SISR between patients with and without CSVD.

RESULTS

Of the enrolled patients, 58.8% had CSVD. The 1- and 2-year ISR rates were 24.7% and 37.1%, respectively. Of the CSVD subtypes, SISR was associated with deep WMHs (DWMHs; HR 5.39, 95% CI 1.02-28.44). DWMH Fazekas scale grades 2 (HR 85.54, 95% CI 2.42-3018.93) and 3 (HR 66.24, 95% CI 1.87-2352.32) were associated with SISR, but DWMH Fazekas grades 0 and 1 were not. The proportions of SISR in patients with DWMH Fazekas grades 0, 1, 2, and 3 were 16.7%, 33.3%, 50%, and 100%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with CSVD have a higher risk of SISR than those without CSVD. Of the CSVD subtypes, patients with DWMHs are associated with SISR. The DWMH Fazekas scale score is considered to be a predictor for SISR.

Endovascular therapy versus medical treatment for symptomatic intracranial artery stenosis

BACKGROUND

Intracranial artery stenosis (ICAS) is an arterial narrowing in the brain that can cause stroke. Endovascular therapy (ET) and conventional medical treatment (CMT) may prevent recurrent ischaemic stroke caused by ICAS. However, there is no consensus on the best treatment for people with ICAS.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of endovascular therapy plus conventional medical treatment compared with conventional medical treatment alone for the management of symptomatic intracranial artery stenosis.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, four other databases, and three trials registries on 16 August 2022. We contacted study authors and researchers when we required additional information.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing ET plus CMT with CMT alone for the treatment of symptomatic ICAS. ET modalities included angioplasty alone, balloon-mounted stent, and angioplasty followed by placement of a self-expanding stent. CMT included antiplatelet therapy in addition to control of risk factors such as hypertension, hyperlipidaemia, and diabetes.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently screened the records to select eligible RCTs, then extracted data from them. We resolved any disagreements through discussion, reaching consensus decisions among the full team. We assessed risk of bias and applied the GRADE approach to assess the certainty of the evidence. The primary outcome was death by any cause or non-fatal stroke of any type within three months of randomisation. Secondary outcomes included all-cause death or non-fatal stroke of any type occurring more than three months after randomisation, ipsilateral stroke, transient ischaemic attack, ischaemic stroke, haemorrhagic stroke, death, restenosis, dependency, and health-related quality of life.

MAIN RESULTS

We included four RCTs with 989 participants who had symptomatic ICAS, with an age range of 18 to 85 years. We identified two ongoing RTCs. All trials had high risk of performance bias, as it was impossible to blind participants and personnel to the intervention. Three trials were terminated early. One trial was at high risk of attrition bias because of substantial loss to follow-up after one year and a high proportion of participants transferring from ET to CMT. The certainty of evidence ranged from low to moderate; we downgraded for imprecision. Compared to CMT alone, ET plus CMT probably increases the risk of short-term death or stroke (risk ratio (RR) 2.93, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.81 to 4.75; 4 RCTs, 989 participants; moderate certainty), short-term ipsilateral stroke (RR 3.26, 95% CI 1.94 to 5.48; 4 RCTs, 989 participants; moderate certainty), short-term ischaemic stroke (RR 2.24, 95% CI 1.30 to 3.87; 4 RCTs, 989 participants; moderate certainty), and long-term death or stroke (RR 1.49, 95% CI 1.12 to 1.99; 4 RCTs, 970 participants; moderate certainty). Compared to CMT alone, ET plus CMT may increase the risk of short-term haemorrhagic stroke (RR 13.49, 95% CI 2.59 to 70.15; 4 RCTs, 989 participants; low certainty), short-term death (RR 5.43, 95% CI 1.21 to 24.40; 4 RCTs, 989 participants; low certainty), and long-term haemorrhagic stroke (RR 7.81, 95% CI 1.43 to 42.59; 3 RCTs, 879 participants; low certainty). It is unclear if ET plus CMT compared with CMT alone has an effect on the risk of short-term transient ischaemic attack (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.30 to 2.07; 3 RCTs, 344 participants; moderate certainty), long-term transient ischaemic attack (RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.50 to 2.19; 3 RCTs, 335 participants; moderate certainty), long-term ipsilateral stroke (RR 1.78, 95% CI 1.00 to 3.17; 4 RCTs, 970 participants; moderate certainty), long-term ischaemic stroke (RR 1.56, 95% CI 0.77 to 3.16; 4 RCTs, 970 participants; moderate certainty), long-term death (RR 1.61, 95% CI 0.77 to 3.38; 4 RCTs, 951 participants; moderate certainty), and long-term dependency (RR 1.51, 95% CI 0.93 to 2.45; 4 RCTs, 947 participants; moderate certainty). No subgroup analyses significantly modified the effect of ET plus CMT versus CMT alone. The trials included no data on restenosis or health-related quality of life.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This review provides moderate-certainty evidence that ET plus CMT compared with CMT alone increases the risk of short-term stroke and death in people with recent symptomatic severe ICAS. This effect was still apparent at long-term follow-up but appeared to be due to the early risks of ET; therefore, there may be no clear difference between the interventions in terms of their effects on long-term stroke and death. The impact of delayed ET intervention (more than three weeks after a qualifying event) warrants further study.

Medical and Endovascular Treatments for Intracranial Atherosclerotic Stenosis: A Network Meta-Analysis

Medical treatment and endovascular therapy are widely used for intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis, but the best treatment strategy remains uncertain. The goal of this study was to compare the safety and effectiveness of medical treatment, stenting, and primary balloon angioplasty (PBA). We searched PubMed, MEDLINE, and EMBASE for trials comparing these three treatments for intracranial stenosis up to December 24, 2020. We performed a network meta-analysis with random-effects models. The primary outcome was any stroke or death during a long-term follow-up. Secondary outcomes included ischemic stroke, intracranial hemorrhage, and death. This network meta-analysis included 14 trials with 1520 participants. No significant difference was found between the three groups in the primary outcome, while PBA was probably the best treatment according to the ranking plot. Medical treatment had significantly lower rate of any stroke or death (odds ratio (OR), 0.31; 95% CI, 0.17-0.56), ischemic stroke (OR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.23-0.81), and intracranial hemorrhage (OR, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.02-0.71) within 30 days than stenting but did not differ from PBA. The ranking plot demonstrated that PBA was also most likely to rank the highest for ischemic stroke during the long-term follow-up and beyond 30 days, although no significant difference was identified. Medical treatment had lower risk of any stroke or death within 30 days than stenting but did not differ from PBA. All the treatments had similar effects on the prevention of long-term stroke, while PBA had the highest probability of being the most effective.

Collateral Flow in Intracranial Atherosclerotic Disease

Intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD) is a major cause of ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack (TIA) worldwide. The culprit of ICAD is frequently a high-grade intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS) pertaining to the infarct territory, and by then, the ICAS is described as symptomatic. A high-grade ICAS may progressively limit cerebral perfusion downstream, demanding collateral compensation. Collateral circulation refers to the pre-existing and dynamic emergence of vascular channels that maintain and compensate for a failing principal vascular route. Collaterals through the Circle of Willis and leptomeningeal circulation are of utmost importance in this regard. In this article, we first discussed the epidemiology, stroke mechanisms, contemporary therapeutics, and prognosis of symptomatic ICAD. Then, we reviewed the collateral routes in ICAS, factors associated with recruitment and development of the collaterals and diagnostic imaging modalities in assessing the origin and function of collateral circulation. We discussed the associations between collateral circulation and clinical outcomes after acute reperfusion treatment in ICAD-related ischemic strokes with or without large vessel occlusion (LVO). We also conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on the associations of collateral circulation with the risk of recurrent stroke and the functional outcome in symptomatic ICAS patients on medical treatment as secondary stroke prevention. Finally, we summarized current evidence in these aspects and proposed the future directions.

Intracranial angioplasty with a self-expandable stent for intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Intracranial angioplasty with a self-expandable stent (SES) is an important endovascular therapy for symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis. We sought to update the evaluation of the perioperative safety and long-term outcomes of self-expandable stent for the treatment of symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis.

Methods

We comprehensively searched the published literature from each database through Sept 16, 2022, for the PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Clinical Trials databases. The characteristics of the studies and patients, perioperative complications, and long-term outcomes were extracted. The pooled outcomes and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated by Stata Statistical Software 14.0.

Results

A total of 4,632 patients from 58 studies were included. The pooled rate of perioperative stroke or death was 6.32% (95% CI 5.04-7.72%); ischemic stroke beyond 30 days through 1 year was 2.72% (95% CI 1.41-4.38%). Perioperative complications differed between the 2014-2022 and 2005-2013 subgroups, as did long-term outcomes between the off-label SES and Wingspan subgroups.

Conclusion

The perioperative complications of intracranial angioplasty with SES have been reduced, but the risk of perioperative stroke or death is still higher than that of aggressive medical therapy, and additional studies are needed to determine whether it has better long-term outcomes than aggressive medical therapy. Perioperative complications varied between the 2014-2022 and 2005-2013 subgroups, as did long-term outcomes between the off-label SES and Wingspan subgroups. Given the high level of heterogeneity observed between the included studies, these results should be interpreted with caution and additional studies are needed.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier: CRD42022316066.

Anterior cerebral artery dissection for a patient with ipsilateral aplastic or twig-like middle cerebral artery: An illustrative case report

Background

An aplastic or twig-like middle cerebral artery (Ap/T-MCA) is a rare anomaly, which sometimes causes ischemic infarction. Collateral flow from the ipsilateral anterior cerebral artery (ACA) is important for patients with Ap/T-MCA. If ipsilateral ACA stenosis or occlusion occurs, a large infarction with a wider field than the ACA territory could happen. First, mechanical thrombectomy was performed for the right ACA near occlusion caused by arterial dissection with ipsilateral Ap/T-MCA in this case. Second, Wingspan stenting was performed for the right ACA restenosis.

Case Description

A 77-year-old female presented to the hospital with the left hemiparesis. We diagnosed a right ACA infarction caused by right ACA occlusion. Digital subtraction angiography showed right Ap/T-MCA and ipsilateral ACA near occlusion. Thrombectomy was performed, and recanalization was achieved with mild ACA stenosis. The lesion was the dissection due to angiographical finding. Two months after treatment, transient left hemiparesis occurred and right ACA stenosis progressed. Computed tomography perfusion showed hypoperfusion of the right hemisphere. Wingspan stenting was performed from the left internal carotid artery through the anterior communicating artery with an intermediate catheter. The patient was discharged without any neurological deficit.

Conclusion

We reported the first case of a patient who underwent Wingspan stenting for the right ACA dissection with Ap/T-MCA. Short-term follow-up and aggressive intervention should be considered for collateral pathway dissection with Ap/T-MCA because the symptoms can become serious. The patients with Ap/T-MCA should be cautious about the collateral pathway arterial changes in particular ipsilateral ACA due to the increasing hemodynamic stress.

Peri-therapeutic multi-modal hemodynamic assessment and detection of predictors for symptomatic in-stent restenosis after percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting

Backgrounds

This study performed multi-modal hemodynamic analysis including quantitative color-coded digital subtraction angiography (QDSA) and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) to delineate peri-therapeutic hemodynamic changes and explore the risk factors for in-stent restenosis (ISR) and symptomatic ISR (sISR).

Methods

Forty patients were retrospectively reviewed. Time to peak (TTP), full width at half maximum (FWHM), cerebral circulation time (CCT), angiographic mean transit time (aMTT), arterial stenosis index (ASI), wash-in gradient (WI), wash-out gradient (WO) and stasis index were calculated with QDSA and translesional pressure ratio (PR) and wall shear stress ratio (WSSR) were quantified from CFD analysis. These hemodynamic parameters were compared between before and after stent deployment and multivariate logistic regression model was established to detect predictors for ISR and sISR at follow-up.

Results

It was found that stenting generally reduced TTP, stasis index, CCT, aMTT and translesional WSSR while significantly increased translesional PR. ASI decreased after stenting, and during the mean follow-up time of 6.48 ± 2.86 months, lower ASI (<0.636) as well as larger stasis index were corroborated to be independently associated with sISR. aMTT showed a linear correlation with CCT before and after stenting.

Conclusion

PTAS not only improved cerebral circulation and blood flow perfusion but also changed local hemodynamics significantly. ASI and stasis index derived from QDSA were proved to play a prominent role in risk stratification for sISR. Multi-modal hemodynamic analysis could facilitate intraoperative real-time hemodynamic monitoring and help the determination of the end point of intervention.

Association of periprocedural perfusion non-improvement with recurrent stroke after endovascular treatment for Intracranial Atherosclerotic Stenosis

Background

Predictors of recurrent stroke after endovascular treatment for symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS) remain uncertain.

Objectives

Among baseline characteristics, lesion features, and cerebral perfusion changes, we try to explore which factors are associated with the risk of recurrent stroke in symptomatic ICAS after endovascular treatment.

Design

Consecutive patients with symptomatic ICAS of 70-99% receiving endovascular treatment were enrolled. All patients underwent whole-brain computer tomography perfusion (CTP) within 3 days before and 3 days after the endovascular treatment. Baseline characteristics, lesion features, and cerebral perfusion changes were collected.

Methods

Cerebral perfusion changes were evaluated with RAPID software and calculated as preprocedural cerebral blood flow (CBF) < 30%, time to maximum of the residue function (Tmax) > 6 s, and Tmax > 4 s volumes minus postprocedural. Cerebral perfusion changes were divided into periprocedural perfusion improvement (>0 ml) and non-improvement (⩽ 0 ml). Recurrent stroke within 180 days was collected. The Cox proportional hazards analysis analyses were performed to evaluate factors associated with recurrent stroke.

Results

From March 2021 to December 2021, 107 patients with symptomatic ICAS were enrolled. Of the 107 enrolled patients, 30 (28.0%) patients underwent balloon angioplasty alone and 77 patients (72.0%) underwent stenting. The perioperative complications occurred in three patients. Among CBF < 30%, Tmax > 6 s, and Tmax > 4 s volumes, Tmax > 4 s volume was available to evaluate cerebral perfusion changes. Periprocedural perfusion improvement was found in 77 patients (72.0%) and non-improvement in 30 patients (28.0%). Nine patients (8.4%) suffered from recurrent stroke in 180-day follow-up. In Cox proportional hazards analysis adjusted for age and sex, perfusion non-improvement was associated with recurrent stroke [hazards ratio (HR): 4.472; 95% CI: 1.069-18.718; p = 0.040].

Conclusion

In patients with symptomatic ICAS treated with endovascular treatment, recurrent stroke may be related to periprocedural cerebral perfusion non-improvement.

Registration

http://www.chictr.org.cn. Unique identifier: ChiCTR2100052925.

Long-term outcome and factors associated with restenosis after combination therapy of balloon angioplasty and stenting for symptomatic intracranial stenosis

BACKGROUND

The optimal treatment for intracranial artery stenosis (ICAS) has not been established. We retrospectively examined the initial and long-term outcomes associated with restenosis of a combination therapy of balloon angioplasty and stenting for symptomatic atherosclerotic ICAS.

METHODS

Consecutive patients who underwent balloon angioplasty and/or stenting for ≥ 70% ICAS between 2006 and 2020 were analyzed. Patients within 48 h of stroke onset were excluded. The following procedures were established as standards at our institution: (1) primary balloon angioplasty alone was initially performed; (2) stenting for insufficient dilatation, recoiling, or dissection was conducted; and (3) stenting was considered for restenosis. Intracranial ischemic and hemorrhagic complications within 30 days after treatment were used to evaluate periprocedural safety. Recurrent ischemic events, restenosis and restenosis related factors were used to be evaluate the long-term outcome.

RESULTS

A total of 160 patients were recruited. Initial treatment consisted of balloon angioplasty (n = 101) and stenting (n = 59). Intracranial complications within 30 days after treatment were ischemic in five (3.1%) and hemorrhagic in four patients (2.5%). The incidence of these complication was 3.1% in the stenting group and 2.5% in the balloon angioplasty group. The mean follow-up period was 53.9 months. Restenosis was found in 42 patients (26%). Recurrent ischemic events during follow-up were noted in 14 patients (8.8%), of which six patients had TIA and eight patients had ischemic stroke. Restenosis-associated factors included diabetes, coronary artery disease, percent stenosis after treatment, and balloon angioplasty in logistic univariate analysis. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that diabetes (HR: 2.084, CI: 1.039-4.180, p = 0.0386), length of lesion (HR; 1.358, CI: 1.174-1.571, p < 0.0001), and balloon angioplasty (HR: 4.194, CI: 1.083-16.239, p = 0.0379) were independent predictors for restenosis.

CONCLUSION

Combination therapy of balloon angioplasty and stenting for symptomatic ICAS had a low perioperative stroke rate and may improve long-term outcome. Balloon angioplasty, diabetes, and length of lesion were significantly associated with restenosis.