Proximal Internal Carotid artery Acute Stroke Secondary to tandem Occlusions (PICASSO) international survey

Relevance of cervical internal carotid artery patency after thrombectomy in tandem occlusion. Are we missing an opportunity to revascularize?

BACKGROUND

Treatment options for cervical internal carotid artery (c-ICA) occlusion in tandem occlusions (TOs) include emergent carotid artery stenting (eCAS) and angioplasty. We attempted to determine the impact of c-ICA reocclusion on the risk of recurrent ischemic stroke (IS) and stroke-related death, as well as functional independence.

METHODS

Patients with TOs undergoing endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) from April 2016 to October 2024 were included. The primary outcome was the 90-day composite of recurrent IS and stroke-related death. Secondary outcomes included the rate of 90-day functional independence (modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0-2) and mortality. We used binary logistic regression to explore the association between c-ICA reocclusion and the outcomes and to identify predictors of c-ICA reocclusion or future revascularization.

RESULTS

We included 163 patients, 85.9% with successful recanalization. Angioplasty and eCAS were performed in 70% and 19%, respectively. c-ICA reocclusion occurred in 22% at a median of 3.5 (0-41.7) days. c-ICA reocclusion increased the odds of recurrent IS or stroke-related death (adjusted OR (aOR) 2.90, 95% CI 1.07 to 8.30, P=0.036) and was associated with lower rates of independence (aOR 0.18, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.58, P=0.004). Among patients who did not undergo eCAS, c-ICA angioplasty (aHR 0.28, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.86, P=0.026) and residual stenosis (aHR 1.04, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.07, P<0.001) were independent predictors of reocclusion or future revascularization.

CONCLUSION

Maintaining c-ICA patency after EVT might be essential due to the association of reocclusion with recurrent IS, stroke-related death, and worse functional outcomes. Residual c-ICA stenosis and angioplasty are valuable predictors of c-ICA patency that can guide management during EVT.

Intravenous thrombolysis before endovascular treatment versus endovascular treatment alone for patients with large vessel occlusion and carotid tandem lesions: individual participant data meta-analysis of six randomised trials

BACKGROUND

For patients with large vessel occlusion and carotid tandem lesions, the best treatment approach is not clear. Intravenous thrombolysis in addition to endovascular treatment might increase the risk of intracranial haemorrhage and decrease effectiveness in this cohort, particularly for patients receiving acute carotid stenting. In an individual participant data meta-analysis of six randomised controlled trials (RCTs), no clear benefit was seen of intravenous thrombolysis in patients with large-vessel occlusion stroke who were eligible for direct endovascular treatment. We aimed to assess whether the presence of carotid tandem lesions would modify the safety and efficacy of intravenous thrombolysis in patients who could directly undergo endovascular treatment, in a prespecified secondary subgroup analysis of this individual participant data meta-analysis.

METHODS

We previously did a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis of six RCTs comparing intravenous thrombolysis plus endovascular treatment with endovascular treatment alone in patients with anterior circulation stroke presenting directly at centres capable of endovascular treatment. The principal investigators of the six identified trials provided individual participant data for 2313 patients, which we pooled. The primary outcome was functional outcome, as measured by 90-day modified Rankin Scale score. Heterogeneity of treatment effect was assessed in the intention-to-treat population using ordinal regression models, with interaction terms for treatment and carotid tandem lesions, followed by a mixed-effects meta-analysis. A sensitivity analysis included only patients who received acute carotid stenting. The study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42023411986.

FINDINGS

Of the 2313 patients who were included in the individual patient data meta-analysis, 2267 (98%) had data for carotid tandem lesions, of whom 1136 were assigned intravenous thrombolysis plus endovascular treatment and 1131 were assigned endovascular treatment alone. 340 patients had carotid tandem lesions (161 intravenous thrombolysis plus endovascular treatment, 179 endovascular treatment alone) and 1927 did not have tandem lesions (975 intravenous thrombolysis plus endovascular treatment, 952 endovascular treatment alone). The median age of patients was 71 years (IQR 62-78); 1003 (44·2%) patients were female and 1264 (55·8%) were male. Compared with endovascular treatment alone, the addition of intravenous thrombolysis did not improve functional outcome in patients with tandem lesions (adjusted common odds ratio [acOR] 1·00, 95% CI 0·62-1·62) or in those without tandem lesions (1·17, 0·99-1·37). No significant heterogeneity of treatment effect was observed between patients with tandem lesions and those without (ratio of odds ratios 0·81, 95% CI 0·48-1·37; pinteraction=0·44). Intracranial haemorrhage rates in patients with tandem lesions were similar for those receiving intravenous thrombolysis plus endovascular treatment (58 [37%] of 155) and for those receiving endovascular treatment alone (65 [38%] of 172; acOR 0·95, 95% CI 0·59-1·54). Rates of symptomatic haemorrhage in patients with tandem lesions were also similar (six [4%] of 159 for those receiving intravenous thrombolysis plus endovascular treatment vs ten [6%] of 179 for those receiving endovascular treatment alone; 0·81, 0·28-2·30). The sensitivity analysis including only patients who received acute carotid stenting showed similar results to the primary analysis.

INTERPRETATION

The findings of this prespecified secondary analysis of an individual patient data meta-analysis show that, in patients with carotid tandem lesions, the addition of intravenous thrombolysis to endovascular treatment was not associated with an increase in the risk of bleeding or with modification of functional outcome. These data suggest that the presence of tandem lesions should not solely influence the decision to administer intravenous thrombolysis to patients who can directly undergo endovascular treatment.

FUNDING

Stryker, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam.

Emergent Carotid Stenting During Thrombectomy in Tandem Occlusions Secondary to Dissection: A STOP-CAD Secondary Study

BACKGROUND

The optimal endovascular management of cervical carotid dissection causing tandem occlusion remains uncertain. We investigated the impact of emergent carotid stenting during endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke in patients with tandem occlusion secondary to cervical carotid artery dissection.

METHODS

This was a secondary analysis of patients treated with endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke due to occlusive carotid artery dissection and tandem occlusion included in the retrospective international STOP-CAD study (Antithrombotic Treatment for Stroke Prevention in Cervical Artery Dissection). We compared patients with and without emergent stenting. The primary efficacy and safety outcomes were 90-day functional independence (modified Rankin Scale score, 0-2) and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage within 24 hours after endovascular treatment. Procedural outcome was successful intracranial recanalization (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score of 2b/3). We used mixed-effects logistic regression adjusting for site, age, and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale. In additional analyses, we used inverse probability of treatment weighting and adjusted for Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score.

RESULTS

Of the 4023 patients enrolled in STOP-CAD, 328 presented with anterior circulation acute ischemic stroke due to tandem occlusion and underwent endovascular treatment. The median age was 51 (interquartile range, 44-58) years, and 96 patients (29.3%) were female. One hundred fifty patients (45.7%) underwent emergent stenting. There was no significant association between stenting and 90-day functional independence (62.0% versus 59.7%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.23 [95% CI, 0.82-1.86]; P=0.315) or symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (7.3% versus 7.9%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.95 [95% CI, 0.41-2.2]; P=0.913). Emergent carotid stenting was associated with successful intracranial recanalization (81.8% versus 76.6%; adjusted odds ratio, 2.62 [95% CI, 1.52-4.5]; P<0.001). Results did not meaningfully change in additional analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients presenting with an acute anterior circulation tandem occlusion secondary to cervical carotid artery dissection, emergent stenting was associated with a higher likelihood of successful intracranial recanalization but not improved functional outcomes or increased symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage. It remains unclear whether emergent stenting led to successful intracranial recanalization or patients with successful intracranial recanalization were more likely to be stented. Randomized trials are warranted.

Safety Outcomes of Antiplatelet Therapy During Endovascular Treatment of Tandem Lesions in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients

Risk of hemorrhage remains with antiplatelet medications required with carotid stenting during endovascular therapy (EVT) for tandem lesion (TLs). We evaluated the safety of antiplatelet regimens in EVT of TLs. This multicenter study included anterior circulation TL patients from 2015 to 2020, stratified by periprocedural EVT antiplatelet strategy: (1) no antiplatelets, (2) single oral, (3) dual oral, and (4) intravenous IV (in combination with single or dual oral). Primary outcome was symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH). Secondary outcomes were any hemorrhage, favorable functional status (mRS 0-2) at 90 days, successful reperfusion (mTICI score ≥ 2b), in-stent thrombosis, and mortality at 90 days. Of the total 691 patients, 595 were included in the final analysis. One hundred and nineteen (20%) received no antiplatelets, 134 (22.5%) received single oral, 152 (25.5%) dual oral, and 196 (31.9%) IV combination. No significant association was found for sICH (ref: no antiplatelet: 5.7%; single:4.2%; aOR 0.64, CI 0.20-2.06, p = 0.45, dual:1.9%; aOR 0.35, CI 0.09-1.43, p = 0.15, IV combination: 6.1%; aOR 1.05, CI 0.39-2.85, p = 0.92). No association was found for parenchymal or petechial hemorrhage. Odds of successful reperfusion were significantly higher with dual oral (aOR 5.85, CI 2.12-16.14, p = 0.001) and IV combination (aOR 2.35, CI 1.07-5.18, p = 0.035) compared with no antiplatelets. Odds of excellent reperfusion (mTICI 2c/3) were significantly higher for cangrelor (aOR 4.41; CI 1.2-16.28; p = 0.026). No differences were noted for mRS 0-2 at 90 days, in-stent thrombosis, and mortality rates. Administration of dual oral and IV (in combination with single or dual oral) antiplatelets during EVT was associated with significantly increased odds of successful reperfusion without an increased rate of symptomatic hemorrhage or mortality in patients with anterior circulation TLs.

Endovascular Treatment for Acute Posterior Circulation Tandem Lesions: Insights From the BASILAR and PERSIST Registries

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Limited evidence exists on the effectiveness of endovascular treatment (EVT) for acute posterior circulation tandem lesion (PCTL). This study aimed to explore the role of extracranial vertebral artery (VA) stenting in patients with PCTL stroke undergoing EVT.

METHODS

Individual patient data were pooled from the BASILAR (EVT for Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion Study) and PERSIST (Posterior Circulation Ischemic Stroke) registries. Patients with PCTLs who underwent EVT were included in the present cohort and divided into the stenting and nonstenting groups based on the placement of extracranial VA stents. The primary efficacy outcome was the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores at 90 days and 1 year. Safety outcomes included 24-hour symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) and all-cause mortality at 90 days and 1 year post-surgery.

RESULTS

A combined dataset of 1,320 patients with posterior circulation artery occlusion, including 263 (19.9%) with tandem lesions, of whom 217 (median age, 65 years; 82.9% male) met the inclusion criteria for the analysis. The stenting group had 84 (38.7%) patients, while the non-stenting group had 133 (61.3%). After adjustment for the potential confounders, extracranial VA stenting was associated with favorable shifts in mRS scores at both 90 days (adjusted common odds ratio [OR], 2.30; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.23-4.28; P<0.01) and 1 year (adjusted OR [aOR], 2.04; 95% CI [1.05-3.97]; P=0.04), along with lower rate of mortality at both 90 days (aOR, 0.45; 95% CI [0.21-0.93]; P=0.01) and 1 year (aOR, 0.36; 95% CI [0.16-0.79]; P=0.01), with no significant difference in sICH incidence (aOR, 0.35; 95% CI [0.06-1.98]; P=0.24).

CONCLUSION

Extracranial VA stenting during EVT may improve functional outcomes and reduce mortality in patients with PCTL strokes.

Stent retriever for Tandem Acute Revascularization Technique (START): a novel technique for the endovascular management of tandem occlusions

Tandem occlusions, characterized by the simultaneous presence of an intracranial large vessel occlusion and extracranial carotid artery stenosis or occlusion,1 pose a unique endovascular challenge.2 3 Typically, the extracranial occlusion is a result of atherosclerotic plaque; however, dissections are also a possible cause. It is currently uncertain whether an intracranial first approach or an extracranial first approach should be employed.4 5 A new technique has been developed which allows for the simultaneous treatment of both the intracranial and the extracranial lesion.6 We describe a variation of this technique: the stent retriever for tandem acute revascularization technique (START), which consists of simultaneously treating the intracranial lesion with stent retriever and contact aspiration, and the extracranial lesion with balloon angioplasty. We present a technical video explaining all the steps of START.(video 1) neurintsurg;16/5/529/V1F1V1Video 1Description and example of the START.

Diagnosis and management of tandem occlusion in acute ischemic stroke

Approximately 20-30% of patients with acute ischemic stroke, caused by large intracranial vessel occlusion, have a tandem lesion, defined as simultaneous presence of high-grade stenosis or occlusion of the cervical internal carotid artery and thromboembolic occlusion of the intracranial terminal internal carotid artery or its branches, usually the middle cerebral artery. Patients with tandem lesions have usually worse outcomes than patients with single intracranial occlusions, and intravenous thrombolysis is less effective in these patients. Although endovascular thrombectomy is currently a cornerstone therapy in the management of acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion, the optimal management of extracranial carotid lesions in tandem occlusion remains controversial. Acute placement of a stent in the cervical carotid artery lesion is the most used therapeutic strategy compared with stented balloon angioplasty and thrombectomy alone without carotid artery revascularization; however, treatment strategies in these patients are often more complex than with single occlusion, so treatment decisions can change based on clinical and technical considerations. The aim of this review is to analyze the results of different studies and trials, investigating the periprocedural neurointerventional management of patients with tandem lesions and the safety, efficacy of the different technical strategies available as well as their impact on the clinical outcome in these patients, to strengthen current recommendations and thus optimize patient care.

Safety Outcomes of Mechanical Thrombectomy Versus Combined Thrombectomy and Intravenous Thrombolysis in Tandem Lesions

BACKGROUND

We aimed to describe the safety and efficacy of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) with or without intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) for patients with tandem lesions and whether using intraprocedural antiplatelet therapy influences MT's safety with IVT treatment.

METHODS

This is a subanalysis of a pooled, multicenter cohort of patients with acute anterior circulation tandem lesions treated with MT from 16 stroke centers between January 2015 and December 2020. Primary outcomes included symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) and parenchymal hematoma type 2. Additional outcomes included hemorrhagic transformation, successful reperfusion (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score 2b-3), complete reperfusion (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score 3), favorable functional outcome (90-day modified Rankin Scale score 0-2), excellent functional outcome (90-day modified Rankin Scale score 0-1), in-hospital mortality, and 90-day mortality.

RESULTS

Of 691 patients, 512 were included (218 underwent IVT+MT and 294 MT alone). There was no difference in the risk of sICH (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.22 [95% CI, 0.60-2.51]; P=0.583), parenchymal hematoma type 2 (aOR, 0.99 [95% CI, 0.47-2.08]; P=0.985), and hemorrhagic transformation (aOR, 0.95 [95% CI, 0.62-1.46]; P=0.817) between the IVT+MT and MT alone groups after adjusting for confounders. Administration of IVT was associated with an increased risk of sICH in patients who received intravenous antiplatelet therapy (aOR, 3.04 [95% CI, 0.99-9.37]; P=0.05). The IVT+MT group had higher odds of a 90-day modified Rankin Scale score 0 to 2 (aOR, 1.72 [95% CI, 1.01-2.91]; P=0.04). The odds of successful reperfusion, complete reperfusion, 90-day modified Rankin Scale score 0 to 1, in-hospital mortality, or 90-day mortality did not differ between the IVT+MT versus MT alone groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study showed that the combination of IVT with MT for tandem lesions did not increase the overall risk of sICH, parenchymal hematoma type 2, or overall hemorrhagic transformation independently of the cervical revascularization technique used. However, intraprocedural intravenous antiplatelet therapy during acute stent implantation might be associated with an increased risk of sICH in patients who received IVT before MT. Importantly, IVT+MT treatment was associated with a higher rate of favorable functional outcomes at 90 days.

Balloon-Assisted Catheterization of Occluded Carotid Artery (BOCA) Technique in Acute Stroke

BACKGROUND

Acute ischemic stroke from tandem occlusion of internal carotid artery (ICA) poses a technical challenge to neurointerventionalists.

OBJECTIVE

To present a novel balloon-assisted catheterization of occluded carotid artery (BOCA) technique used for rapid and effective catheterization of occluded/critically stenosed ICA in tandem occlusion.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 10 patients with tandem carotid occlusion, treated with BOCA technique for revascularization between July 2020 and June 2021, was performed. Clinical, radiographic, and procedural data; details of BOCA technique; complications; and outcomes were reviewed.

RESULTS

Of the 10 patients, 8 (80%) had complete occlusion of the cervical ICA and the remaining 2 had high-grade stenosis with poor intracranial flow. The mean age was 63.2 years. The mean presenting NIH Stroke Scale was 13.4. The BOCA technique resulted in recanalization of ICA in all patients and allowed mechanical thrombectomy of middle cerebral artery. Thrombolysis in cerebral infarction grade 2b/3 was achieved in all 10 patients. The mean groin-to-reperfusion time was 41.4 minutes. The mean internal carotid artery stenosis was 99.7% preoperatively and 41.1% postoperatively. Only one patient needed stent at the end of the procedure because of dissection.

CONCLUSION

The BOCA technique can be used in distal first approach for acute stroke from tandem ICA occlusion. This technique allows direct guide catheterization of occluded ICA by tracking over a partially inflated balloon.

Functional and Safety Outcomes of Carotid Artery Stenting and Mechanical Thrombectomy for Large Vessel Occlusion Ischemic Stroke With Tandem Lesions

Importance

Approximately 10% to 20% of large vessel occlusion (LVO) strokes involve tandem lesions (TLs), defined as concomitant intracranial LVO and stenosis or occlusion of the cervical internal carotid artery. Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) may benefit patients with TLs; however, optimal management and procedural strategy of the cervical lesion remain unclear.

Objective

To evaluate the association of carotid artery stenting (CAS) vs no stenting and medical management with functional and safety outcomes among patients with TL-LVOs.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cross-sectional study included consecutive patients with acute anterior circulation TLs admitted across 17 stroke centers in the US and Spain between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2020. Data analysis was performed from August 2021 to February 2022. Inclusion criteria were age of 18 years or older, endovascular therapy for intracranial occlusion, and presence of extracranial internal carotid artery stenosis (>50%) demonstrated on pre-MT computed tomography angiography, magnetic resonance angiography, or digital subtraction angiography.

Exposures

Patients with TLs were divided into CAS vs nonstenting groups.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Primary clinical and safety outcomes were 90-day functional independence measured by a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0 to 2 and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), respectively. Secondary outcomes were successful reperfusion (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score ≥2b), discharge mRS score, ordinal mRS score, and mortality at 90 days.

Results

Of 685 patients, 623 (mean [SD] age, 67 [12.2] years; 406 [65.2%] male) were included in the analysis, of whom 363 (58.4%) were in the CAS group and 260 (41.6%) were in the nonstenting group. The CAS group had a lower proportion of patients with atrial fibrillation (38 [10.6%] vs 49 [19.2%], P = .002), a higher proportion of preprocedural degree of cervical stenosis on digital subtraction angiography (90%-99%: 107 [32.2%] vs 42 [20.5%], P < .001) and atherosclerotic disease (296 [82.0%] vs 194 [74.6%], P = .003), a lower median (IQR) National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score (15 [10-19] vs 17 [13-21], P < .001), and similar rates of intravenous thrombolysis and stroke time metrics when compared with the nonstenting group. After adjustment for confounders, the odds of favorable functional outcome (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.67; 95% CI, 1.20-2.40; P = .007), favorable shift in mRS scores (aOR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.02-2.10; P = .04), and successful reperfusion (aOR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.02-3.60; P = .002) were significantly higher for the CAS group compared with the nonstenting group. Both groups had similar odds of sICH (aOR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.46-2.40; P = .87) and 90-day mortality (aOR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.50-1.20; P = .27). No heterogeneity was noted for 90-day functional outcome and sICH in prespecified subgroups.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this multicenter, international cross-sectional study, CAS of the cervical lesion during MT was associated with improvement in functional outcomes and reperfusion rates without an increased risk of sICH and mortality in patients with TLs.

Predictors of outcome after endovascular treatment for tandem occlusions: a single center retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

The endovascular treatment procedure in tandem occlusions (TO) is complex compared to single occlusion (SO) and optimal management remains uncertain. The aim of this study was to identify clinical and procedural factors that may be associated to efficacy and safety in the management of TO and compare functional outcome in TO and SO stroke patients.

METHODS

This is a retrospective single center study of medium (MeVO) and large vessel occlusion (LVO) of the anterior circulation. Clinical, imaging, and interventional data were analyzed to identify predictive factors for symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) and functional outcome after endovascular treatment (EVT) in TO. Functional outcome in TO and SO patients was compared.

RESULTS

Of 662 anterior circulation stroke patients with MeVO and LVO stroke, 90 (14%) had TO. Stenting was performed in 73 (81%) of TO patients. Stent thromboses occurred in 8 (11%) patients. Successful reperfusion with modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (mTICI) ≥ 2b was achieved in 82 (91%). SICH occurred in seven (8%). The strongest predictors for sICH were diabetes mellitus and number of stent retriever passes. Good functional clinical outcome (mRS ≤ 2) at 90-day follow up was similar in TO and SO patients (58% vs 59% respectively). General anesthesia (GA) was associated with good functional outcome whereas hemorrhage in the infarcted tissue, lower mTICI score and history of smoking were associated with poor outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of sICH was increased in patients with diabetes mellitus and those with extra stent-retriever attempts. Functional clinical outcomes in patients with TO were comparable to patients with SO.

Emergent Management of Tandem Occlusions in Anterior Circulation Stroke: A Single-Centre Experience

OBJECTIVE

For anterior circulation tandem occlusions, the optimal management strategy for extracranial carotid lesions is controversial. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of acute stenting (AS) with balloon angioplasty (BA) only.

METHODS

Clinical data were collected from 98 patients with anterior circulation tandem occlusion who underwent endovascular treatment at our center. Of these patients, 64 and 34 were assigned to the AS and BA groups, respectively. The clinical characteristics and outcome data of the 2 groups were analyzed and compared.

RESULTS

The proportion of patients with good outcomes was 59.2%. The AS group had a higher rate of successful recanalization (98.4% vs. 82.4%, P = 0.007) and a lower rate of occlusion of the responsible vessel at 90 days (14.1% vs. 32.4%, P = 0.039) than the BA group. The AS group was also significantly better than the BA group in terms of good outcomes (67.2% vs. 44.1%, P = 0.027), but there was no significant difference between the 2 groups in terms of 90-day mortality (6.3% vs. 8.8%, P = 0.691) and asymptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (6.3% vs. 5.9%, P = 1.000). Lower baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores were associated with good outcomes (P < 0.001), and the presence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage was associated with 90-day mortality (P = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

Acute stent placement in patients with acute ischemic stroke due to anterior circulation tandem occlusion may have a better outcome than BA alone, and the safety of both approaches is comparable.

Acute Carotid Artery Stenting Versus Balloon Angioplasty for Tandem Occlusions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background Despite thrombectomy having become the standard of care for large-vessel occlusion strokes, acute endovascular management in tandem occlusions, especially of the cervical internal carotid artery lesion, remains uncertain. We aimed to compare efficacy and safety of acute carotid artery stenting to balloon angioplasty alone on treating the cervical lesion in tandem occlusions. Similarly, we aimed to explore those outcomes' associations with technique approaches and use of thrombolysis. Methods and Results We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare functional outcomes (modified Rankin Scale), reperfusion, and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and 3-month mortality. We explored the association of first approach (anterograde/retrograde) and use of thrombolysis with those outcomes as well. Two independent reviewers performed the screening, data extraction, and quality assessment. A random-effects model was used for analysis. Thirty-four studies were included in our systematic review and 9 in the meta-analysis. Acute carotid artery stenting was associated with higher odds of modified Rankin Scale score ≤2 (odds ratio [OR], 1.95 [95% CI, 1.24-3.05]) and successful reperfusion (OR, 1.89 [95% CI, 1.26-2.83]), with no differences in mortality or symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage rates. Moreover, a retrograde approach was significantly associated with modified Rankin Scale score ≤2 (OR, 1.72 [95% CI, 1.05-2.83]), and no differences were found on thrombolysis status. Conclusions Carotid artery stenting and a retrograde approach had higher odds of successful reperfusion and good functional outcomes at 3 months than balloon angioplasty and an anterograde approach, respectively, in patients with tandem occlusions. A randomized controlled trial comparing these techniques with structured antithrombotic regimens and safety outcomes will offer definitive guidance in the optimal management of this complex disease.

Carotid artery angioplasty versus stenting for management of acute tandem occlusions

Background The optimal approach to treat the cervical carotid artery lesion during endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for acute strokes with tandem occlusions is unclear. While carotid artery stenting (CAS) might be a more definitive recanalization method, the potential risk of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) limits its routine usage. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the safety outcomes of CAS and carotid artery angioplasty (CAA) in patients with acute tandem occlusions. Methods In this retrospective cohort study, data were obtained from the Nationwide Readmissions Database 2016-2017. The primary safety outcome was a composite of ICH and all-cause in-hospital mortality. Logistic regression analysis was used to compare the in-hospital outcomes. Survival analysis was used to estimate the 30-day readmissions. Results We identified 2042 hospitalizations meeting the study inclusion criteria (median age: 66 years, female 31.3%). Of these, 1391 (68.1%) had undergone CAS and 651 (31.9%) CAA alone. Baseline characteristics between the two groups were similar, except patients with CAS were more likely to be on anti-thrombotic medications and were less likely to have received intravenous thrombolysis. There was no significant difference in the clinical outcomes including ICH, in-hospital mortality, gastrostomy tube placement, prolonged mechanical ventilation, length of stay, hospital charges, and 30-day readmissions between the two groups, however, patients with CAS were more likely to be discharged home after adjusting for the confounding variables [odds ratio (OR) 1.49, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.05-2.12, P 0.025]. Conclusion The emergent CAS-EVT approach appears to be safe with no adverse outcomes compared to CAA alone.