Addition of intracranial aspiration to balloon guide catheter does not improve outcomes in large vessel occlusion anterior circulation stent retriever based thrombectomy for acute stroke

The initial experience with the Walrus balloon guide catheter - Results from two high-volume thrombectomy centres

BackgroundWe report our initial experience on the use of the Walrus, a new generation balloon guide catheter (BGC) capable of accommodating large bore aspiration catheters for patients undergoing endovascular stroke thrombectomy for large vessel occlusion with a particular focus on procedural aspects related to the vascular anatomy, recanalisation efficacy and complications.MethodsThis is a retrospective, site-adjudicated, two-centre study on consecutive patients with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion treated with the Walrus BGC. Baseline characteristics and procedural and clinical outcomes were analysed.ResultsBetween July 2023 and January 2024, we recruited 300 participants (mean age 69.5 ± 15 years; 132 (44%) females). The mean admission NIHSS was 15.8 ± 6.5, and the mean ASPECTS was 7.6 ± 1.9. Combined stent-retriever and aspiration first-line thrombectomy technique was performed in 235 patients (79%). The Walrus BGC was successfully navigated to the ICA in 99.7% of patients. Near complete-complete recanalisation (eTICI2c-3) was achieved in 75.4% of patients, and the eTICI2b-3 rate was 92.2%. First-pass effect (eTICI2c-3) was achieved in 49% of patients, and the modified first-pass effect (eTICI2b-3) was 65.9%. No significant difference in the arterial puncture-to-guide catheter placement time across the three different arch types (P = .52) or between the favourable and unfavourable ASMETS score (P = .085) was observed. Any intracranial haemorrhage (ICH) occurred in 14.9% of patients, and symptomatic ICH in 3.9%.ConclusionUse of the Walrus large bore BGC during endovascular stroke thrombectomy appears effective in reaching the target vessel without a significant time penalty across various anatomical configurations and tortuosity, whilst maintaining a satisfactory safety profile.

Aspiration Catheter Design Impacts Combined Approach Mechanical Thrombectomy in Anterior Circulation Large Vessel Stroke

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Large-bore aspiration catheters (LBACs) are used for thrombectomy in large vessel occlusion (LVO), either as a standalone direct aspiration first-pass technique or combined with a stent retriever (ASR). LBAC design may influence ASR thrombectomy efficacy. We compared the safety and performance of the novel MIVI Q segmental catheter with the well-established SOFIA aspiration device in ASR thrombectomy.

METHODS

We analyzed data from the Registry cOmbined vS SinglE Thrombectomy TechnIques registry of consecutive patients with anterior circulation LVO and compared the outcomes of those treated with first-line ASR thrombectomy using Q (Q5 or Q6) or SOFIA (5F or 6F Plus) catheters. Demographic, clinical, angiographic, and clinical outcome data (24-h National Institute of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS] and modified Rankin Scale score at 3 months) were compared.

RESULTS

Of the 853 patients, 155 (18.2%) were treated with MIVI Q and 698 (81.8%) with SOFIA catheters. After adjusting for age, sex, NIHSS score at baseline, tPA use, site occlusion, anesthesia type, and diameter and length of SR, the MIVI Q group was comparable to the SOFIA group in terms of first-pass effect or successful final recanalization and safety. However, the MIVI Q group had a shorter mechanical thrombectomy time (20 [10-45] min vs. 33 [20-51] min; odds ratio [OR] = 7.4, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.1-14; p = 0.021) and a lower rate of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (3.3% vs. 8.8%; OR = 3.59, 95% CI: 1.45-10.9; p = 0.011).

CONCLUSIONS

In ASR neurothrombectomy, SOFIA aspiration catheters were not superior to MIVI Q in achieving successful and complete first-passage recanalization; however, MIVI Q had shorter procedural times and a lower rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage.

Mechanical thrombectomy failure in anterior circulation large vessel occlusion: an overview from the ROSSETTI registry

BACKGROUND

Although mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is an effective treatment for large vessel occlusion (LVO) with a high successful recanalization rate, MT failure (MTF) occurs in 10-15% of cases and is associated with unfavorable outcomes. However, little is known about the clinical, technical, and radiological reasons for MTF. We investigated the technical factors associated with MTF.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients with anterior LVO prospectively included in the ongoing observational multicenter ROSSETTI registry. Patients were categorized according to the success (≥mTICI 2b) or failure (

RESULTS

We analyzed 4135 patients, including 325 patients (7.9%) with MTF. Patients in the MTF group had a significantly lower Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) at baseline (8 (7-10) vs 9 (8-10)), longer time since last time seen well (279 min vs 262 min), increased MT procedure time (76 min vs 31 min), higher rate of complications (23% vs 4%), higher symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (21% vs 7.9%), higher 24 hour National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score (19 vs 6), worse functional outcome at 3 months (modified Rankin Scale score 0-2, 15.6% vs 53%), and higher mortality (45% vs 20%). Four or more passes were an independent predictor of MTF (OR 3.46, 95% CI 2.58 to 4.63; P<0.001). None of the endovascular techniques demonstrated a higher likelihood of MTF.

CONCLUSION

In this study, MTF in anterior circulation LVO was associated with a high complication rate and worse outcomes.

Collapse

Key Words

• Brain
• Device
• Intervention
• Stroke
• Technique

Collapse

MESH Headings Collapse

Grants Collapse

Affiliation(s)

Lluis Morales-Caba Interventional Neurorradiology, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Valencia, Spain
Josep Puig Radiology Department CDI and IDIBAPS, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
Juan Manuel Sanchís Neuroradiology Unit, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, Spain
Víctor Vázquez La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Valencia, Spain
Mariano Werner Department of Radiology, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
Guillem Dolz Neurointerventional Department CDI, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
Marc Comas-Cufí Department of Computer Science, Applied Mathematics and Statistics, University of Girona, Girona, Spain
Pepus Daunis-I-Estadella Department of Computer Science, Applied Mathematics and Statistics, University of Girona, Girona, Spain
Pedro Vega Radiology, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain
Eduardo Murias Radiology, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain
Eva González Interventional Neuroradiology. Radiology, Hospital Universitario Cruces, Bilbao, Spain
Xabier Manso Interventional Neuroradiology. Radiology, Hospital Universitario Cruces, Bilbao, Spain
Fernando Delgado Diagnostic and Therapeutical Neuroradiology Unit, Hospital Reina Sofía, Córdoba, Spain
Carlos Martínez Neurorradiology, Hospital Universitario Reina Sofia, Cordoba, Spain
Carlos Pérez-García Interventional Neuroradiology, Hospital Clinico Universitario San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
Santiago Rosati Department of Radiology, Clinical San Carlos Hospital, Section of Interventional Neuroradiology, Madrid, Spain
Sebastian Remollo Interventional Neuroradiology Unit, Department of Neurosciences, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain Department of Neurosciences, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain
Carlos Castaño Interventional Neuroradiology Unit, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Barcelona, Spain
Isabel Vielba-Gómez Stroke Unit, Department of Neurology, Hospital Universitario de Girona Doctor Josep Trueta, Girona, Spain
Tomàs Xuclà Stroke Unit, Department of Neurology, Hospital Universitario de Girona Doctor Josep Trueta, Girona, Spain
Lucia Aja Neuroradiology, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain
Javier Martínez-Fernández Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
Yeray Aguilar Tejedor Radiology Department, Hospital Universitario Insular de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain
Jose Carlos Mendez Interventional Neuroradiology Unit, Radiology, Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain
José Carlos Rayón-Aledo Interventional Neuroradiology, Alicante General University Hospital, Alicante, Valenciana, Spain
Guillermo Parrilla Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain
Víctor Cuba Radiology, Bellvitge University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain Hospital Universitari de Tarragona Joan XXIII, Tarragona, Spain
Luis Hernán Vargas Department of Interventional Neuroradiology, Hospital Universitario de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
Antonio Doncel-Moriano Cubero Stroke Unit, Neurology, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
Luis San Roman Neurointerventional Department CDI, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
Jordi Blasco Neurointerventional Department CDI, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
Fernando Aparici-Robles Sección Neurorradiología, Area Clinica, Imagen Médica, Hospital Politécnico y Universitario La Fe, Valencia, Spain

Collapse

Collaborators Collapse

Effect of Proximal Blood Flow Arrest During Endovascular Thrombectomy (ProFATE): A Multicenter, Blinded-End Point, Randomized Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

The effect of temporary blood flow arrest during endovascular thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke is uncertain due to the lack of evidence from randomized controlled trials. We aimed to investigate whether temporary blood flow arrest during endovascular thrombectomy using a balloon guide catheter improves intracranial vessel recanalization compared with nonflow arrest.

METHODS

The ProFATE trial (Proximal Blood Flow Arrest During Endovascular Thrombectomy) was a multicenter, randomized, participant- and outcome-blinded trial at 4 thrombectomy centers in the United Kingdom. Adults with acute ischemic stroke due to anterior circulation large vessel occlusion were randomly assigned (1:1) by a central, Web-based program with a minimization algorithm to undergo thrombectomy with temporary proximal blood flow arrest or nonflow arrest during each attempt. The primary outcome was the proportion of participants achieving near-complete/complete vessel recanalization (expanded Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score of 2c or 3) at the end of the thrombectomy procedure, adjudicated by a blinded independent imaging core laboratory. Analyses were performed on the intention-to-treat population, adjusted for age, IV thrombolysis, onset-to-randomization time, Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score, occlusion site, randomization site, and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale.

RESULTS

Between October 10, 2021, and June 27, 2023, we recruited 134 participants, of whom 131 participants (mean age, 75 years; 62 [47%] women and 69 [53%] men) were included in the final analysis. Sixty-six participants were allocated to the temporary blood flow arrest group and 65 to the nonflow arrest group. The proportion of participants with an expanded Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction 2c/3 score at the end of the endovascular procedure was 74.4% (49/66) in the flow arrest group and 70.8% (46/65) in the nonflow arrest group (adjusted odds ratio, 1.07 [95% CI, 0.45-2.55]; P=0.88). Among the prespecified secondary efficacy outcomes, a lower rate of emboli to a new vascular territory occurred in the blood flow arrest group compared with the nonflow arrest group (1.5% versus 12.3%; adjusted odds ratio, =0.04 [95% CI, 0.01-0.53]; P=0.014) and a higher rate of complete recanalization (expanded Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score, 3) after the first attempt in the flow arrest group versus the nonflow arrest group (33.0% versus 15.3%; adjusted odds ratio, =3.80 [95% CI, 1.40-10.01]; P=0.007). No between-group differences were identified for the remaining procedural or clinical efficacy (modified Rankin Scale at 90 days) or safety outcomes (worsening of the stroke severity at 24 hours, adverse events, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, or mortality).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients presenting with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion acute ischemic stroke, temporary proximal blood flow arrest during endovascular thrombectomy, compared with nonflow arrest, did not significantly improve the near-complete/complete vessel recanalization (expanded Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score, 2c-3) at the end of the procedure. Larger randomized controlled trials are warranted to confirm or refute a clinically significant treatment effect of temporary flow arrest on the functional outcome following endovascular thrombectomy.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT05020795.

Efficacy and safety of combined stent retriever and contact aspiration vs. stent retriever alone on revascularization in patients with acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective

Whether the efficacy of combined stent retriever and contact aspiration (S + A) is superior to stent retriever (S) alone for revascularisation in patients with large vessel occlusive stroke remains uncertain. The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the safety and efficacy of combined stent retriever and contact aspiration for the treatment of acute ischaemic stroke with large vessel occlusion by comparing it with stent retriever alone.

Methods

We systematically searched the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and The Cochrane Library databases for randomised controlled trials and observational studies (case-control and cohort studies) published before 1 October 2023 comparing the efficacy of combined stent retriever and contact aspiration versus tent retriever alone in patients with large vessel occlusive stroke. The end point of the primary efficacy observed in this meta-analysis study was the rate of first pass nearly complete or complete recanalisation (mTICI 2c-3). Secondary effectiveness nodes were: rate of first pass successful recanalisation (mTICI 2b-3), rate of near-complete or complete recanalisation of the postoperative vessel, rate of successful recanalisation of the postoperative vessel, and MRS 0-2 within 90 days. Safety endpoints were interoperative embolism, symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage, and mortality within 90 days.

Results

A total of 16 studies were included in the literature for this meta-analysis, with a total of 7,320 patients (S + C group: 3,406, S group: 3,914). A comprehensive analysis of the included literature showed that combined stent retriever and contact aspiration had a higher rate of near-complete or complete recanalisation of the postoperative vessel [OR = 1.53, 95% CI (1.24, 1.88), p < 0.0001] and rate of successful recanalisation of the postoperative vessel compared to stent retriever alone [OR = 1.83, 95% CI (1.55, 2.17), p < 0.00001]; there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of the rate of first pass nearly complete or complete recanalisation [OR = 1.00, 95% CI (0.83, 1.19), p = 0.96], rate of first pass successful recanalisation [OR = 1.02, 95% CI (0.85, 1.24), p = 0.81], interoperative embolism [OR = 0.93, 95% CI (0.72, 1.20), p = 0.56], symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage [OR = 1.14, 95% CI (0.87, 1.48), p = 0.33], MRS 0-2 within 90 days [OR = 0.89, 95% CI (0.76, 1.04), p = 0.14] and mortality within 90 days [OR = 1.11, 95% CI (0.94, 1.31), p = 0.22].

Conclusion

Combined stent retriever and contact aspiration has a higher rate of postprocedural revascularisation (mTICI 2c-3/mTICI 2b-3) compared with stent retriever alone in patients with large vessel occlusion stroke. In addition, it was not superior to stenting alone in terms of the rate of first pass recanalisation (mTICI 2c-3/mTICI 2b-3), interoperative embolisation, symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage, good functional prognosis within 90 days and mortality within 90 days.

Clot composition and recanalization outcomes in mechanical thrombectomy

BACKGROUND

Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) has become standard for large vessel occlusions, but rates of complete recanalization are suboptimal. Previous reports correlated radiographic signs with clot composition and a better response to specific techniques. Therefore, understanding clot composition may allow improved outcomes.

METHODS

Clinical, imaging, and clot data from patients enrolled in the STRIP Registry from September 2016 to September 2020 were analyzed. Samples were fixed in 10% phosphate-buffered formalin and stained with hematoxylin-eosin and Martius Scarlett Blue. Percent composition, richness, and gross appearance were evaluated. Outcome measures included the rate of first-pass effect (FPE, modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction 2c/3) and the number of passes.

RESULTS

A total of 1430 patients of mean±SD age 68.4±13.5 years (median (IQR) baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score 17.2 (10.5-23), IV-tPA use 36%, stent-retrievers (SR) 27%, contact aspiration (CA) 27%, combined SR+CA 43%) were included. The median (IQR) number of passes was 1 (1-2). FPE was achieved in 39.3% of the cases. There was no association between percent histological composition or clot richness and FPE in the overall population. However, the combined technique resulted in lower FPE rates for red blood cell (RBC)-rich (P<0.0001), platelet-rich (P=0.003), and mixed (P<0.0001) clots. Fibrin-rich and platelet-rich clots required a higher number of passes than RBC-rich and mixed clots (median 2 and 1.5 vs 1, respectively; P=0.02). CA showed a trend towards a higher number of passes with fibrin-rich clots (2 vs 1; P=0.12). By gross appearance, mixed/heterogeneous clots had lower FPE rates than red and white clots.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the lack of correlation between clot histology and FPE, our study adds to the growing evidence supporting the notion that clot composition influences recanalization treatment strategy outcomes.

Effect of Bridging Thrombolysis on the Efficacy of Stent Retriever Thrombectomy Techniques : Insights from the SWIFT-DIRECT trial

BACKGROUND

There are little available data regarding the influence of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) on the efficacy of different first line endovascular treatment (EVT) techniques.

METHODS

We used the dataset of the SWIFT-DIRECT trial which randomized 408 patients to IVT + EVT or EVT alone at 48 international sites. The protocol required the use of a stent retriever (SR), but concomitant use of a balloon guide catheter (BGC) and/or distal aspiration (DA) catheter was left to the discretion of the operators. Four first line techniques were applied in the study population: SR, SR + BGC, SR + DA, SR + DA + BGC. To assess whether the effect of allocation to IVT + EVT versus EVT alone was modified by the first line technique, interaction models were fitted for predefined outcomes. The primary outcome was first pass mTICI 2c‑3 reperfusion (FPR).

RESULTS

This study included 385 patients of whom 172 were treated with SR + DA, 121 with SR + DA + BGC, 57 with SR + BGC and 35 with SR. There was no evidence that the effect of IVT + EVT versus EVT alone would be modified by the choice of first line technique; however, allocation to IVT + EVT increased the odds of FPR by a factor of 1.68 (95% confidence interval, CI 1.11-2.54).

CONCLUSION

This post hoc analysis does not suggest treatment effect heterogeneity of IVT + EVT vs EVT alone in different stent retriever techniques but provides evidence for increased FPR if bridging IVT is administered before stent retriever thrombectomy.

Mechanical thrombectomy with combined stent retriever and contact aspiration versus stent retriever alone for acute large vessel occlusion: data from ANGEL-ACT registry

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

An analysis of the ASTER 2 trial revealed similar final recanalisation levels and clinical outcomes in acute large vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke between stent retrieval (SR) alone as a first-line mechanical thrombectomy (MT) technique (SR alone first-line) and concomitant use of contact aspiration (CA) plus SR as a first-line MT technique (SR+CA first-line). The purpose of the present study was to compare the safety and efficacy of SR+CA first-line with those of SR alone first-line for patients with LVO in China.

METHODS

We conducted the present study by using the data from the ANGEL-ACT registry. We divided the selected patients into SR+CA first-line and SR alone first-line groups. We performed logistic regression and generalised linear models with adjustments to compare the angiographic and clinical outcomes, including successful/complete recanalisation after the first technique alone and all procedures, first-pass successful/complete recanalisation, number of passes, 90-day modified Rankin Scale, procedure duration, rescue treatment and intracranial haemorrhage within 24 hours.

RESULTS

Of the 1233 enrolled patients, 1069 (86.7%) received SR alone first-line, and 164 (13.3%) received SR+CA first-line. SR+CA first-line was associated with more thrombectomy passes (3 (2-4) vs 2 (1-2); β=1.77, 95% CI=1.55 to 1.99, p<0.001), and longer procedure duration (86 (60-129) min vs 80 (50-122) min; β=10.76, 95% CI=1.08 to 20.43, p=0.029) than SR alone first-line group. Other outcomes were comparable (all p>0.05) between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing SR+CA first-line had more thrombectomy passes and longer procedure duration than patients undergoing SR alone first-line. Additionally, we suggested that SR+CA first-line was not superior to SR alone first-line in final recanalisation level, first-pass recanalisation level and 90-day clinical outcomes in the Chinese population.

A review of mechanical thrombectomy techniques for acute ischemic stroke

Mechanical thrombectomy is established as standard of care in the management of acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion and evidence-based guidelines for mechanical thrombectomy have been defined. As research continues to further expand the eligibility criteria for thrombectomy and the number of thrombectomy procedures increase worldwide, there is also growing focus on innovation of thrombectomy devices, procedural techniques, and related outcomes. Thrombectomy primarily involves use of stent retrievers and distal aspiration techniques, but variations and different combinations of techniques have been reported. As this is a rapidly evolving area in stroke management, there is debate as to which, if any, of these techniques leads to improved clinical outcomes over another and there is a lack of data comparing them. In this review, currently published and distinct techniques of mechanical thrombectomy are described methodically along with illustrations to aid in understanding the subtle differences between the techniques. The perceived benefits of each variation are discussed.

Estimating the impact of balloon guide catheter with mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke: A U.S. cost analysis

BACKGROUND

Balloon guide catheters (BGCs) can be used adjunctively during mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Evaluating the potential economic impact associated with adjunctive BGC use is an important consideration for resource allocation.

METHODS

Decision tree models were used to estimate the economic value of BGC use in MT through its impact on functional outcomes. Healthcare utilization cost estimates in the short- and long-term for patients with different 90-day mRS scores were analyzed for MT-only and MT + BGC scenarios. Deterministic (one-way) and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate the robustness and uncertainty of model parameters.

RESULTS

Per-patient index hospitalization cost was estimated at $65,260 for MT-only and $62,883 for MT + BGC scenarios. Per-patient one-year post-index hospitalization cost was estimated at $27,569 for MT-only and $24,830 for MT + BGC. MT + BGC had a total cost savings of $5117 compared with MT-only. Deterministic (one-way) sensitivity analysis demonstrated that cost saving per patient was most sensitive to the proportion of patients in the mRS 0-2 category in both MT + BGC and MT-only. In a probabilistic sensitivity analysis, mean per-patient costs for the index hospitalization were estimated at $63,737 for MT-only and $61,425 for MT + BGC. Mean per-patient cost estimates one-year post-index hospitalization was $27,445 for MT-only and $24,715 for MT + BGC. MT + BGC had a total cost savings of $5043 compared with MT-only.

CONCLUSION

Mechanical thrombectomy with adjunctive BGC use may reduce short-term and long-term patient costs due to improved functional outcomes when compared to MT treatment alone for AIS.

Effect of proximal blood flow arrest during endovascular thrombectomy (ProFATE): Study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Observational studies have demonstrated improved outcomes with the adjunctive use of balloon guide catheters (BGC) during endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for anterior circulation acute ischaemic stroke (AIS). However, the lack of high-level evidence and global practice heterogeneity justifies a randomised controlled trial (RCT) to investigate the effect of transient proximal blood flow arrest on the procedural and clinical outcomes of patients with AIS following EVT.

HYPOTHESIS

Proximal blood flow arrest in the cervical internal carotid artery during EVT for proximal large vessel occlusion is superior to no flow arrest in achieving complete vessel recanalisation.

METHODS

ProFATE is an investigator-initiated, pragmatic, multicentre RCT with blinding of participants and outcome assessment. An estimated 124 participants with an anterior circulation AIS due to large vessel occlusion, an NIHSS of ⩾2, ASPECTS ⩾ 5 and eligible for EVT using a first-line combined technique (contact aspiration and stent retriever) or contact aspiration only will be randomised (1:1) to receive BGC balloon inflation or no inflation during EVT.

OUTCOMES

The primary outcome is the proportion of patients achieving near-complete/complete vessel recanalisation (eTICI 2c-3) at the end of the EVT procedure. Secondary outcomes include the functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale at 90 days), new or distal vascular territory clot embolisation rate, near-complete/complete recanalisation after the first pass, symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage, procedure-related complications and death at 90 days.

DISCUSSION

This is the first RCT to investigate the effect of proximal blood flow arrest during EVT using a BGC on the procedural and clinical outcomes of patients with AIS due to large vessel occlusion.

Combined balloon guide catheter, aspiration catheter, and stent retriever technique versus balloon guide catheter and stent retriever alone technique: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The use of a combination of balloon guide catheter (BGC), aspiration catheter, and stent retriever in acute ischemic stroke thrombectomy has not been shown to be better than a stent retriever and BGC alone, but this may be due to a lack of power in these studies. We therefore performed a meta-analysis on this subject.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed on PubMed, Scopus, Embase/Ovid, and the Cochrane Library from inception to October 20, 2021. Our primary outcomes were the rate of successful final reperfusion (Treatment in Cerebral Ischemia (TICI) 2c-3) and first pass effect (FPE, defined as TICI 2c-3 in a single pass). Secondary outcomes were 3 month functional independence (modified Rankin Scale score of 0-2), mortality, procedural complications, embolic complications, and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (SICH). A meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5,4, and heterogeneity was assessed using the I² test.

RESULTS

Of 1629 studies identified, five articles with 2091 patients were included. For the primary outcomes, FPE (44.9% vs 45.4%, OR 1.04 (95% CI 0.90 to 1.22), I²=57%) or final successful reperfusion (64.5% vs 68.6%, OR 0.98 (95% CI 0.81% to 1.20%), I²=85%) was similar between the combination technique and stent retriever only groups. However, the combination technique had significantly less rescue treatment (18.8% vs 26.9%; OR 0.70 (95% CI 0.54 to 0.91), I²=0%). This did not translate into significant differences in secondary outcomes in functional outcomes, mortality, emboli, complications, or SICH.

CONCLUSION

There was no significant difference in successful reperfusion and FPE between the combined techniques and the stent retriever and BGC alone groups. Neither was there any difference in functional outcomes, complications, or mortality.

A Meta-analysis of Combined Aspiration Catheter and Stent Retriever versus Stent Retriever Alone for Large-Vessel Occlusion Ischemic Stroke

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of combined aspiration catheter and stent retriever compared with stent retriever alone for the treatment of large-vessel occlusion acute ischemic stroke is unclear.

PURPOSE

Our aim was to conduct a systematic literature review and meta-analysis on several metrics of efficacy comparing aspiration catheter and stent retriever with stent retriever alone.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library Databases were searched. Randomized controlled trials and case-control and cohort studies were included.

STUDY SELECTION

Ten comparative studies were included detailing a combined 1495 patients with aspiration catheter and stent retriever and 1864 with stent retrievers alone.

DATA ANALYSIS

Data on first pass effect (TICI 2b/2c/3 after first pass), final successful reperfusion (modified TICI ≥2b), and 90-day functional independence (mRS ≤ 2) were collected. Meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model.

DATA SYNTHESIS

There was a pooled composite first pass effect of 40.8% (611/1495) versus 32.6% (608/1864) for aspiration catheter and stent retriever and stent retriever alone, respectively (P < .0001). Similarly, on a meta-analysis, aspiration catheter and stent retriever were associated with a higher first pass effect compared with stent retriever alone (OR = 1.63; 95% CI, 1.20-2.21; P = .002; I² = 72%). There was no significant difference in composite rates of successful reperfusion between aspiration catheter and stent retriever (72.8%, 867/1190) and stent retriever alone (70.8%, 931/1314) (P = .27) or on meta-analysis (OR = 1.31; CI, 0.81-2.12; P = .27; I² = 82%). No difference was found between aspiration catheter and stent retriever and stent retriever alone on 90-day functional independence (OR = 1.02; 95% CI, 0.77-1.36; P = .88; I² = 40%).

LIMITATIONS

This study is limited by high interstudy heterogeneity.

CONCLUSIONS

On meta-analysis, aspiration catheter and stent retriever are associated with a superior first pass effect compared with stent retriever alone, but they are not associated with statistically different final reperfusion or functional independence.