Troponin and BNP are markers for subsequent non-ischaemic congestive heart failure: the Caerphilly Prospective Study (CaPS)

Plasma viscosity, immunoglobulins and risk of cardiovascular disease and mortality: new data and meta-analyses

AIMS

Associations of plasma viscosity and plasma Ig levels (a determinant of viscosity) with incident coronary heart disease (CHD) events; and with CHD, cardiovascular disease (CVD: CHD and stroke) and all-cause mortalities.

METHODS

Meta-analysis of plasma viscosity levels from the MONitoring of trends and determinants of CArdiovascular (MONICA)/Cooperative Health Research in the Region of Augsburg, MONICA Glasgow and Speedwell Studies; and five other published studies. Meta-analysis of IgA, IgG and IgM levels from the Augsburg, Glasgow and Speedwell studies; and one other published study.

RESULTS

Over median follow-up periods of 14-26 years, there were 2270 CHD events, and 4220 all cause deaths in 28 605 participants with baseline plasma viscosity measurements. After adjustment for major risk factors, (HRs; 95% CIs) for a 1 SD increase in viscosity were 1.14 (1.09 to 1.20) for CHD events; and 1.21 (1.17 to 1.25) for all-cause mortality. 821 CHD events and 2085 all-cause deaths occurred in 8218 participants with baseline Ig levels. For CHD events, adjusted HRs for 1 SD increases in IgA, IgG and IgM were, respectively, 0.97 (0.89 to 1.05); 0.95(0.76 to 1.17) and 0.90 (0.79 to 1.03). Corresponding adjusted HRs for all-cause mortality were 1.08 (95% CI 1.02 to 1.13), 1.03 (95% CI 0.94 to 1.14) and 1.01 (95% CI 0.96 to 1.06).

CONCLUSIONS

After risk factor adjustment, plasma viscosity was significantly associated with risks of CHD events; and with CHD, CVD and all-cause mortalities. We found no significant association of IgA, IgG or IgM levels with incident CHD events or mortality, except for a borderline association of IgA with all-cause mortality.

Cardiovascular biomarkers: exploring troponin and BNP applications in conditions related to carbon monoxide exposure

BACKGROUND

The diagnosis and prognosis of cardiovascular disorders are greatly aided by cardiovascular biomarkers. The uses of troponin and B-type natriuretic peptide in situations involving carbon monoxide exposure are examined in this narrative review. These biomarkers are important because they help predict outcomes in cardiovascular disorders, track the effectiveness of therapy, and influence therapeutic choices.

MAIN BODY

Clinical practice makes considerable use of B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), which has diuretic and vasodilatory effects, and troponin, a particular marker for myocardial injury. Carbon monoxide (CO) poisoning is a major worldwide health problem because CO, a "silent killer," has significant clinical consequences. Higher risk of cardiac problems, poorer clinical outcomes, and greater severity of carbon monoxide poisoning are all linked to elevated troponin and B-type natriuretic peptide levels. BNP's adaptability in diagnosing cardiac dysfunction and directing decisions for hyperbaric oxygen therapy is complemented by troponin's specificity in identifying CO-induced myocardial damage. When combined, they improve the accuracy of carbon monoxide poisoning diagnoses and offer a thorough understanding of cardiac pathophysiology.

CONCLUSIONS

To sum up, this review emphasizes the importance of troponin and B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) as cardiac indicators during carbon monoxide exposure. While BNP predicts long-term cardiac problems, troponin is better at short-term morbidity and death prediction. When highly sensitive troponin I (hsTnI) and B-type natriuretic peptide are combined, the diagnostic accuracy of carbon monoxide poisoning patients is improved. One of the difficulties is evaluating biomarker levels since carbon monoxide poisoning symptoms are not always clear-cut. Accurate diagnosis and treatment depend on the investigation of new biomarkers and the use of standardized diagnostic criteria. The results advance the use of cardiovascular biomarkers in the intricate field of carbon monoxide exposure.

Determining Which Hospitalized Coronavirus Disease 2019 Patients Require Urgent Echocardiography

Background

Patients hospitalized with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) often have abnormal findings on transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). However, although not all abnormalities on TTE result in changes in clinical management, performing TTE in recently infected patients increases disease transmission risks. It remains unknown whether common biomarker tests, such as troponin and B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), can help distinguish in which patients with COVID-19 TTE may be safely delayed until infection risks subside.

Methods

Using electronic health records data and chart review, the authors retrospectively studied all patients hospitalized with COVID-19 in a multisite health care system from March 1, 2020, to January 15, 2021, who underwent TTE within 14 days of their first positive COVID-19 result and had BNP and troponin measured before or within 7 days of TTE. The primary outcome was the presence of one or more urgent echocardiographic findings, defined as left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 35%, wall motion score index ≥ 1.5, moderate or greater right ventricular dysfunction, moderate or greater pericardial effusion, intracardiac thrombus, pulmonary artery systolic pressure > 50 mm Hg, or at least moderate to severe valvular disease. Stepwise logistic regression was conducted to determine biomarkers and comorbidities associated with the outcome. The performance of a rule for classifying TTE using troponin and BNP was evaluated.

Results

Four hundred thirty-four hospitalized and 151 intensive care unit patients with COVID-19 were included. Urgent findings on TTE were present in 105 patients (24.2%). Troponin and BNP were abnormal in 311 (71.7%). Heart failure (odds ratio, 5.41; 95% CI, 2.61–11.68), troponin > 0.04 ng/mL (odds ratio, 4.40; 95% CI, 2.05–10.05), and BNP > 100 pg/mL (odds ratio, 5.85; 95% CI, 2.35–16.09) remained significant predictors of urgent findings on TTE after stepwise selection. No urgent findings on TTE were seen in 95.1% of all patients and in 91.3% of intensive care unit patients with normal troponin and BNP.

Conclusions

Troponin and BNP were highly associated with urgent echocardiographic findings and may be used in triaging algorithms for determining in which patients TTE can be safely delayed until after their peak infectious window has passed.

Cardiovascular Risk Assessment for Noncardiac Surgery: Are We Ready for Biomarkers?

Biomarkers aided perioperative cardiac assessment is a relatively new concept. Cardiac biomarkers with historical significance (aspartate transaminase, dehydrogenase, creatinine kinase and myoglobin) have paved the way for traditional biomarkers (cardiac troponin, C-reactive protein, lipoprotein). Contemporary biomarkers like natriuretic peptides (BNP and ProBNP) are validated risk markers in both acute and chronic cardiac diseases and are showing remarkable promise in predicting serious cardiovascular complications after non-cardiac surgery. This review is intended to provide a critical overview of traditional and contemporary biomarkers for perioperative cardiovascular assessment and management. This review also discusses the potential utility of newer biomarkers like galectin-3, sST-2, GDF-15, TNF-alpha, MiRNAs and many others that can predict inflammation, cardiac remodeling, injury and endogenous stress and need further investigations to establish their clinical utility. Though promising, biomarker led perioperative care is still in infancy and it has not been determined that it can improve clinical outcomes.

Is Cardiac Troponin I Valuable to Detect Low-Level Myocardial Damage in Congestive Heart Failure?

Objectives:

Congestive heart failure (CHF) is a heart disease with a growing incidence and prevalence. Creatine kinase-myocardial base (CK-MB) is generally used to determine myocardial damage; however, it is insufficiently sensitive to measure the relatively low level of myocardial damage that typically occurs in heart failure (HF). The use of cardiac troponins, which are far more sensitive and specific, has become common to identify myocardial damage and permits the detection of even minute amounts of damage. The aim of this study was to ascertain whether cardiac troponin I (cTnI) can be used to detect low-level myocardial damage occurring in CHF in real-life conditions.

Methods:

Fifty patients with CHF symptoms (Group I) and 20 patients who were evaluated as normal (Group II) were included in this prospective study. The Framingham criteria were used to diagnose HF. Group I was divided into 3 subgroups according to the New York Heart Association classification of functional capacity: Class II, Group A; Class III, Group B, and Class IV, Group C. On the first day of admission, CK-MB and cTnI levels were measured and assessed quantitatively. The cTnI level was compared between these 3 subgroups and between Groups I and II. Linear regression analysis was performed to investigate the relationship between ejection fraction (EF) and cTnI.

Results

The mean cTnI value was 0.084±0.07 ng/mL in Group I and 0.018±0.012 ng/mL in Group II (p=0.0001). The mean cTnI value was 0.047±0.016 ng/mL, 0.080±0.048 ng/mL, and 0.175± 0.102 ng/mL in Groups A, B, and C, respectively. The difference between the subgroups of Group I was statistically significant. In addition, it was observed that there was a significant difference in the EF (%) value between Groups I and II and between Groups A, B, and C. Linear regression analysis revealed an inverse relationship between EF and cTnI (r: -0.66) (p=0.0001).

Conclusion

As the severity of HF increased, the cTnI serum level also increased. This increase was inversely related to the EF value. These results are consistent with other studies in the literature, suggesting that the cTnI level may be a useful marker in the diagnosis and evaluation of severity of HF.