Primary care referral protocol for carpal tunnel syndrome

Local Corticosteroid Injections versus Surgical Carpal Tunnel Release for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Introduction: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common entrapment neuropathy. This meta-analysis compared local steroid injections (LSIs) versus carpal tunnel release (CTR) for the management of CTS. Neurophysiological parameters, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), and the complication rate were investigated. We hypothesized that LSIs may represent an effective and safe alternative to surgical management. Methods: This systematic review was conducted according to the 2020 PRISMA statement. All the clinical investigations comparing LSIs versus CTR for carpal tunnel syndrome were accessed. In March 2022, the following databases were accessed: Pubmed, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Embase. No time constrains were used for the search. The risk of bias and statistical analyses were conducted using the Review Manager Software 5.3 (The Nordic Cochrane Collaboration, Copenhagen). Results: Data from 1096 procedures were retrieved. The mean follow-up was 12.3 (1 to 58) months. The mean age of the patients was 51.1 ± 4.6. Nocturnal paraesthesia (p < 0.0001) and visual analogue scale (p < 0.0001) were greater in the LSIs cohort. No difference was found in the functional (p = 0.2) and symptom (p = 0.4) subscales of the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ), median nerve distal motor latency (p = 0.9), median nerve motor amplitude (p = 0.7), median nerve sensory conduction velocity (p = 0.4), or median nerve sensory amplitude (p = 0.3). No difference was found in terms of minor complications (p = 0.9). No major complications were observed within the duration of follow-up. Conclusion: Both CTR and LSIs were effective and feasible in reducing symptoms of carpal tunnel syndrome. Though LSIs led to greater pain relief, this superiority was not permanent. Irrespective of the severity of the symptoms, current evidence suggests that a cycle of LSIs may be considered in patients with CTS. However, patients must be aware that LSIs may not be the definitive therapy, and CTR should be recommended.

Safety of corticosteroid injection for carpal tunnel syndrome

The risks of corticosteroid injection for carpal tunnel syndrome, principally intraneural injection and tendon rupture, are known only from anecdotal reports. The literature does not allow an accurate estimate of their incidence or that of lesser side effects such as local pain. We have encountered only four serious complications in 9515 injections. We asked patients about possible side effects at routine follow-up, 6 weeks after 689 injections with 40 mg triamcinolone. Possible side effects were reported after 33% of injections. The commonest was short-lived local pain, which occurred in 13% of injected limbs, all cases having resolved within 3 weeks. No cases of intraneural injection or tendon rupture occurred, even after repeated injection. Most adverse effects were transient, but 13 hands exhibited persistent skin depigmentation or subcutaneous atrophy. This data provides the best current estimate of the risks of carpal tunnel injection and may be used to inform patients considering this intervention.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Does prior local corticosteroid injection prejudice the outcome of subsequent carpal tunnel decompression?

It has been suggested that treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome by local corticosteroid injection may prejudice the outcome of subsequent surgery. We identified patients who had proceeded directly to carpal tunnel surgery and patients who had initially been treated with one or more injections and then subsequently underwent carpal tunnel surgery on the same hand. Outcomes of surgery were evaluated using pre- and post-operative Boston carpal tunnel syndrome scales and an ordinal scale for overall satisfaction. Multivariate models were created to study the effect of pre-operation injection on the surgical outcome while controlling for demographic and clinical variables. A total of 942 patients were included; 85% of the direct group and 84% of the prior-injection group reported themselves either completely cured or much improved after surgery. Post-operative symptom severity and functional status scores showed no significant difference between the direct-to-surgery and prior-injection groups. Prior local steroid injection does not prejudice the outcome of surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

A Bayesian network meta-analysis: Comparing the clinical effectiveness of local corticosteroid injections using different treatment strategies for carpal tunnel syndrome

BACKGROUND

Local corticosteroid injections are commonly used to improve the short-term symptomatic severity and the functional status of the hands affected by carpal tunnel syndrome. We conducted a systematic review and Bayesian network-meta-analysis to compare the clinical effectiveness of local corticosteroid injections using different injection approaches.

METHODS

Electronic literature in Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and other sources were searched to identify clinical studies comparing different injection approaches with each other or placebo for carpal tunnel syndrome. Two review authors conducted selection of studies, data extraction, and assessment of risk of bias independently. Random-effects models were used to conduct the pairwise meta-analysis and the Bayesian network meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Overall, 10 studies with 633 patients were included in the systematic review. Among the injection approaches, local corticosteroid injections using the ultrasound-guided in-plane injection (Ulnar-I) approach was the best treatment strategy for clinical response (median OR versus placebo 128.30, 95% CrI 9.76 to 2299.00), change in symptom severity scale (median MD versus placebo -1.16, 95% CrI -1.95 to -0.38) , and change in functional status scale (median MD versus placebo -0.74, 95% CrI -2.00 to 0.52) at short-term follow-up period in the network meta-analysis. Local corticosteroid injections using other injection approaches were better than placebo for clinical response (for the PI approach, median OR versus placebo 8.85, 95% CrI 3.00 to 33.15; for the DI approach, median OR versus placebo 7.00, 95% CrI 0.53 to 118.80) , change in symptom severity scale (for the Ulnar-O approach, median MD versus placebo -0.78, 95% CrI -1.43 to -0.16; for the PI approach, median MD versus placebo -0.58, 95% CrI -0.95 to -0.22), and change in functional status scale (for the Ulnar-O approach, median MD versus placebo -0.63, 95% CrI -1.67 to 0.43; for the PI approach, median MD versus placebo -0.46, 95% CrI -1.11 to 0.21) at short-term follow-up period. The quality of studies is good.

CONCLUSIONS

According to our analyses, the ultrasound-guided in-plane injection (Ulnar-I) approach was the most effective treatment among the injection approaches for carpal tunnel syndrome.

Assessment of phonophoresis and iontophoresis in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome: a randomized controlled trial

To define the role of phonophoresis and iontophoresis of corticosteroids in conjunction with wrist splint use in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) compared to wrist splint use alone, 52 CTS subjects were analyzed based on clinical and electrophysiological criteria. A prospective, randomized controlled trial was carried out to assess symptom severity, motor skills, and hand function according to the Boston Symptom Severity Scale (BSSS), grip strength, and nine-hole peg test (NHPT), respectively, on the initial visit and in the 3rd month after treatment. The patients underwent conservative interventions randomly as follows: (1) 3 weeks of phonophoresis with betamethasone in conjunction with wrist splint use (group I, n: 18) or (2) 3 weeks of iontophoresis with betamethasone in conjunction with wrist splint use (group II, n: 16) or (3) wrist splint use alone (control, group III, n: 18). The mean age of the patients was 43.7 ± 8.4 (range 24-57) years. Groups I, II, and III showed a significant and further improvement in BSSS at the 3rd month evaluations compared with baseline (P < 0.001, P = 0.001, P < 0.001, respectively), but no significant change was observed in grip strength or NHPT (P > 0.05). There was a statistically significant difference between the phonophoresis and control groups after treatment only regarding BSSS, in favor of phonophoresis (P = 0.012). We recommend the use of wrist splints especially with phonophoresis for relief of symptoms in patients with CTS. Our results demonstrated no superiority among the treatment groups. Further, transdermal steroid treatments are not key determinants of efficacy with respect to motor skills and hand dexterity.

Audit of a Therapist-led Clinic for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome in Primary Care

An audit was designed to evaluate the effect on waiting times, did not attend (DNA) rates and quality of clinical management of a hand therapist-led clinic for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS) in Primary Care, and to investigate whether the clinic acted as an effective threshold mechanism for the Pulvertaft Hand Centre consultant clinics.

Following a period of training with a senior consultant at the Pulvertaft Centre, an experienced hand therapist from the Centre worked out in Primary Care seeing patients with a provisional diagnosis of CTS who had been referred directly from General Practitioners (GPs). The referrals were assisted by the use of a local referral protocol. Tinel's and Phalen's tests were performed and areas of sensory loss were documented. A Levine Questionnaire was completed by the patient at an initial appointment and subsequently at review four to eight weeks later. Grip and pinch measurements were taken using a Jamar® Dynamometer. Mild and moderate CTS can be effectively managed by a community-based Hand Therapy Clinic. Forty five percent of GP-referred CTS patients were successfully managed without referral onto the Hand Centre and did not require further treatment for CTS in the subsequent two years. The consultation length was 30 minutes per patient at the therapist-led clinic, compared with 15 minutes at the Hand Centre. Waiting times were reduced from 90 to 20 days, and the clinic had a low (3%) DNA rate. Wrist splints were expertly chosen and fitted and patients were educated and empowered about their condition. The Hand Therapy Clinic acted as a useful threshold mechanism for Tertiary Care Hand Centre CTS referrals, removing 46% of CTS referrals from the Hand Centre clinics. The proportion of Hand Clinic-referred patients requiring carpal tunnel decompression (CTD) was therefore increased to 62% from 33%. This community-based, hand therapist-led clinic for CTS management is consistent with current Health Service initiatives.

Patients' health beliefs and adaptation to carpal tunnel syndrome based on duration of symptomatic presentation

The purpose of this paper was to examine the health beliefs and adaptation of patients receiving hand therapy treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). A maximum variation sample of five patients referred for treatment of CTS was used to provide a diverse group of patients with varied backgrounds of age, gender, race, and occupation. Qualitative interviews based on the Health Beliefs model were conducted at the initial evaluation. Adaptive comments were recorded throughout the process. A grounded theory method was used to code and analyze the information gathered. Four themes emerged as to why and when persons wait to seek treatment for CTS: 1) denial of symptoms; 2) work/positioning the cause; 3) life changes; and 4) last resort. In conclusion, a low level of perceived seriousness and a low level of perceived susceptibility to CTS appeared to interfere with persons' seeking treatment for CTS.

Trends in elective hand surgery referrals from primary care

INTRODUCTION

Two prospective audits of activity in a hand unit were performed, in 1989-1990 and during 2000-2001, to identify trends in elective hand surgery referrals from primary care.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Two 6-month prospective audits of activity in a hand unit were performed, including elective referrals from primary care. Data were collected on all in-district referrals with elective hand disorders. Cross boundary flow was identified to permit assessment of changes in referrals by diagnosis over a decade.

RESULTS

There was a 36% increase in health authority referrals for elective hand surgery over the decade (from 289 to 392 per 100,000 of population per year). The number of elective hand surgery operations rose 34% over the decade (from 149 to 199 operations per 100,000 of population per year). Carpal tunnel syndrome (the commonest reason for elective referral) almost doubled (from 59.7 to 112 per 100,000 of population per year). Referrals for ganglion, the second most common elective referral, rose modestly. Referrals for osteoarthritis (commonly basal thumb arthritis) almost trebled over the decade to become the fourth commonest condition referred to the hand unit (from 12.7 to 34 per 100,000 of population per year). Referrals for Dupuytrens disease, trigger finger and rheumatoid arthritis were relatively unchanged over the decade. Congenital hand referrals are uncommon but doubled during the decade.

CONCLUSIONS

Hand surgery referrals rose by 36% over the decade. Analysis of the commoner conditions referred reveal a high prevalence within the community with the possibility of increased referrals in years to come.

Single vs. two steroid injections for carpal tunnel syndrome: a randomised clinical trial

We investigated the efficacy of a single vs. double steroid injections in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) in a randomised double-blind controlled trial. Patients with idiopathic CTS were randomised into (i) one group receiving a baseline methylprednisolone acetate injection plus a saline injection 8 weeks later and (ii) a second group receiving methylprednisolone acetate injection at baseline and at 8 weeks. The primary outcome was the Global Symptom Score (GSS). Forty patients were recruited. By 40 weeks, the mean GSS improved from 25.6 to 14.1 in the single-injection group whereas from 26.7 to 12.6 in the reinjection group, but there was no significant difference in GSS between the two groups (p = 0.26). There were also no significant differences in terms of electrophysiological and functional outcomes. The results suggest that an additional steroid injection confers no added benefit to a single injection in terms of symptom relief.

Seasonal distribution and demographical characteristics of carpal tunnel syndrome in 1039 patients

OBJECTIVE

To describe the demographic characteristics of gender, age, and presence of repetitive movements, intake of alcohol and non-steroid anti-inflammatories (NSAI), medical specialties that referred patients to nerve conduction studies and electromyography (NCS-EMG), school attainment, and seasonal distribution in patients with a neurophysiological diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) in the State of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.

METHOD

A series of 1039 patients (1549 hands) with neurophysiologically defined CTS was studied. Patients were referred for NCS-EMG in 3 universities and 2 private services, from August 2001 to January 2003. All patients completed a questionnaire containing demographic information. The diagnosis of CTS was established following a pre-established protocol, with defined diagnostic criteria.

RESULTS

Around one fourth of patients had already performed NCS-EMG; the greatest frequency of CTS was observed in women (5.6:1) and in patients above the age of 40. Most patients reported performing repetitive movements in their daily routine (69.7%); 12.9% reported use of NSAI and 14.9% regular intake of alcoholic beverages. A greater frequency of CTS was observed in the months of July and August, when compared to the other months of the year. Around 2/3 of the study population had completed at least secondary school. Most requests of nerve conduction studies did not provide a diagnostic hypothesis (59.9%) and neurophysiologic studies were requested mostly by traumatology/orthopedics (71.1%).

CONCLUSION

We have concluded that, in our environment, CTS shows some demographical characteristics that are similar to what the literature describes. Also, we have found that most of our sample concluded at least secondary school, and was referred to neurophysiologic studies by orthopedists. To be pointed out is the seasonal distribution of CTS, which demonstrates a significant association with winter months.

Primary care management of carpal tunnel syndrome

Carpal tunnel syndrome of mild to moderate severity can often be effectively treated in a primary care environment. Workplace task modification and wrist splints can reduce or defer referral to hospital for surgical decompression. Nerve and tendon gliding exercises may also be of benefit. Steroid injections to the mouth of the carpal tunnel are particularly useful for symptomatic women in the third trimester of pregnancy. However inadvertent neural injection may cause disabling chronic pain. Referral to a minority of practitioners trained in the technique would ensure sufficient patient numbers to maintain skill levels.