Advising patients seeking stem cell interventions for multiple sclerosis

What is known about healthcare professional-patient communication when discussing stem cell therapies? A scoping review

OBJECTIVES

When therapeutic options are limited, patients may invest hope in therapies proposed by healthcare professional, or those they find online. This review aims to explore how healthcare professional-patient communication is realised when discussing stem cell therapies.

METHOD

Four electronic databases were systematically searched for relevant studies. Twenty-six studies met the inclusion criteria. Descriptive analyses and a thematic analysis guided by a functions of medical communication framework were performed on extracted data.

RESULTS

Most included studies addressed communication in contexts of conventional stem cell therapies, such as bone marrow transplants for blood cancers. Few studies investigated communication in contexts of experimental stem cell therapies yet to receive regulatory approval. Two themes were identified as informational and relational aspects of communication, and a third theme being a mismatch in orientations.

CONCLUSIONS

Communication between healthcare professionals and patients about stem cell therapies is practised using a combination of communication approaches that do not always align with patients' needs, hopes or expectations.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

The context of healthcare settings and health conditions are important when communicating about stem cell therapies. Acknowledging healthcare professionals' environmental and personal determinants can inform strategies to navigate complex discussions about stem cell therapies with patients.

Autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for immune-mediated neurological diseases: what, how, who and why?

In carefully selected patients, autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a safe, highly effective and cost-saving treatment modality for treatment-resistant, and potentially treatment-naïve, immune-mediated neurological disorders. Although the evidence base has been growing in the last decade, limited understanding has led to confusion, mistrust and increasing use of health tourism. In this article, we discuss what autologous HSCT is, which immune-mediated conditions can be treated with it, how to select patients, what are the expected outcomes and potential adverse effects, and how cost-effective this treatment is.

Mesenchymal stem cell therapy: A review of clinical trials for multiple sclerosis

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a disease of the central nervous system (CNS) that is the result of the body's own immune cells being auto-reactive to the myelin regions of the body as if these regions were foreign antigens. This demyelination process is damaging to the electrical conductivity of neurons. The current medicines are only capable of fighting off the symptoms of the disease, but not the disease itself. Specialized stem cells, known as mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), seem to be the candidate therapy to get rid of MS. MSCs can be isolated from multiple sources of the person's body, and even from the umbilical cord (UC) and placenta of a donor. These cells have anti-inflammatory effects so they can target the overactivity and self-antigen attacks by T cells and macrophages; this immune system overactivity is characteristic of MS. MSCs show the ability to locate into brain lesions when injected and thus can compensate for the loss of the brain function by differentiating into neuronal precursor cells and glial cells. The author has listed tables of clinical trials that have utilized MSCs from different sources, along with the years and the phase of study completed for each trial. The consensus is that these cells work on inhibiting CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cell activation, T regulatory cells (Tregs), and macrophage switch into the auto-immune phenotype.

The best source of MSCs seems to be the UC due to the easiness of extraction, the noninvasive method of collection, their higher expansion ability and more powerful immune-modulating properties compared to other locations in the body. Studies showed there was a significant decline of mRNA expression of several cytokines after the administration of MSCs derived from the UC (UCMSCs). Other researchers were able to repair the defects of Tregs in MS patients by co-culturing Tregs from these patients with UCMSCs, which decreased the production of the pro-inflammatory cytokine IFN γ, and also suggested a strong link between Tregs lack of functionality in MS patients with the pathogenesis of the disease.

International stem cell tourism: a critical literature review and evidence-based recommendations

Stem cell tourism is an emerging area of medical tourism activity. Frustrated by the slow translation of stem cell research into clinical practice, patients with debilitating conditions often seek therapeutic options that are not appropriately regulated. This review summarises recent developments in the field of stem cell tourism and provides clinicians with the information necessary to provide basic pretravel health advice to stem cell tourists. PubMed and Scopus databases were consulted for relevant publications, using combinations of the terms 'stem cell', 'tourism', 'regenerative medicine', 'international', 'travel medicine' and 'environmental health'. The leading countries in the international stem cell tourism market are the USA, China, India, Thailand and Mexico. As the majority of clinics offering stem cell therapies are based in low- and-middle-income countries, stem cell tourists place themselves at risk of receiving an unproven treatment, coupled with the risk of travel-related illnesses. These clinics do not generally provide even basic travel health information on their websites. In addition to often being ineffective, stem cell therapies are associated with complications such as infection, rejection and tumorigenesis. Physicians, researchers, regulatory bodies, advocacy groups and medical educators are encouraged to work together to improve patient and physician education and address current legislative deficiencies.

Promises and Limitations of Neural Stem Cell Therapies for Progressive Multiple Sclerosis

Multiple disease-modifying medications with regulatory approval to treat multiple sclerosis (MS) are unable to prevent inflammatory tissue damage in the central nervous system (CNS), and none directly promote repair. Thus, there is an unmet clinical need for therapies that can arrest and reverse the persistent accumulation of disabilities associated with progressive forms of MS (P-MS). Preclinical research has revealed an unexpected ability of neural stem cell (NSC) therapies to provide neurotrophic support and inhibit detrimental host immune responses in vivo following transplantation into the chronically inflamed CNS. We discuss NSC transplantation as a promising therapy for P-MS, elaborate on the necessities of clinical trial validation and formalized usage guidelines, and caution about unscrupulous 'clinics' marketing unproven therapies to patients.

Safety and efficacy of stem cell therapy for treatment of neural damage in patients with multiple sclerosis

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a multifocal inflammatory disease that involves the central nervous system and associated with limbs paralysis and serious problems in sensation, limbs, visual and sphincter. This disease is a result of autoimmune mechanism in which autoantibodies target the self-myelin antigens and cause demyelination. Because of the myelin dysfunction, MS is clinically identified with neurological disabilities. Furthermore, it can be entered into the progressive phase because of irreversible neurodegeneration and axons damage. Unfortunately, there is no effective therapeutic method for this disease and current medications have been focused on amelioration of symptoms and chronic inflammation. Although current immunotherapies ameliorate the reactivity of autoimmune anti-myelin and MS relapse rate, there is no approved method for improvement of the disease progression and repairing of the damaged myelin. Therefore, finding an appropriate clinical treatment for improvement of neurological damages in MS patients is essential. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are multipotent cells with high proliferative and self-renewal capacities, as well as immunomodulatory and neuroregenerative effects. Bone marrow and adipose tissues derived MSCs have been considered for the treatment of different diseases because not only they can be easily isolated from these tissues, but also a patient can be served as a donor for himself without the risk of rejection. More importantly, autologous MSCs carry a safer pattern without the risk of malignant transformation. Here, we will discuss the effectiveness of MSCs therapy for MS patients by reviewing of clinical trials.

Patients' expectations of autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation as a treatment for MS

BACKGROUND

Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (aHSCT) receives increasing attention as a treatment option for MS. However, as there are no randomized controlled trials comparing aHSCT to best medical treatment as yet, aHSCT is not generally advised and implemented as a treatment option for MS. Neurologists are increasingly faced with patients asking questions regarding aHSCT and seeking commercially offered aHSCT abroad. The aim of this study is to evaluate MS patients' knowledge and expectations of aHSCT and their actual and desired sources of information.

METHODS

137 MS patients visiting the Amsterdam University Medical Center MS clinic, completed a self-developed questionnaire with items on disease history, knowledge about aHSCT, expectations of aHSCT, information sources and the role they assign to their neurologists.

RESULTS

Fifty-four percent is considering aHSCT either now or in the future, especially those who are dissatisfied with current treatment, have a shorter disease duration (≤ 10 years) or are more disabled (EDSS > 3.5). Only 25% report to have sufficient knowledge about aHSCT. Patients mainly use potentially unreliable information sources such as the internet and television, although they prefer information from their neurologist. Half of the patients think aHSCT to be superior to highly effective DMT. Expectations of efficacy in patients interested in aHSCT are significantly higher than in patients not wanting to undergo aHSCT. Only about one third of patients are able to mention at least one side effect.

CONCLUSION

Many MS patients are considering aHSCT as a treatment option, although they think that they are not well-informed regarding aHSCT. They prefer their neurologist as a source of information. Therefore, neurologists should pro-actively inform their patients about the potential benefits and risks of aHSCT to enable them to choose the best treatment option.

General information for patients and carers considering haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for severe autoimmune diseases (ADs): A position statement from the EBMT Autoimmune Diseases Working Party (ADWP), the EBMT Nurses Group, the EBMT Patient, Family and Donor Committee and the Joint Accreditation Committee of ISCT and EBMT (JACIE)

Over the last 20 years, haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) has been used to treat patients with severe autoimmune and inflammatory diseases whose response to standard treatment options has been limited, resulting in a poor long-term prognosis in terms of survival or disability. The vast majority of patients have received autologous HSCT where an increasing evidence-base supports its use in a wide range of autoimmune diseases, particularly relapsing remitting MS, systemic sclerosis and Crohn’s disease. Compared with standard treatments for autoimmune diseases, HSCT is associated with greater short-term risks, including a risk of treatment-related mortality and long-term complications. There is a need for a careful appraisal of potential benefits and risks by disease and transplant specialists working closely together with patients and carers to determine individual suitability for HSCT. HSCT should be conducted in accredited transplant centres with robust arrangements for long-term follow-up with both disease and transplant specialists. The aim of this open-access position statement is to provide plainly worded guidance for patients and non-specialist clinicians considering HSCT for an autoimmune disease, especially when treatment abroad is being considered. Recent technical publications in the field have been referenced to support the statement and provide more detail for clinicians advising patients.