1
|
Hoeyer K, Couturier A, Barawi K, Drew C, Grundtvig A, Lane E, Munk AK, Whiteley LE, Munsie M. Searching for information about stem cells online in an age of artificial intelligence: How should the stem cell community respond? Stem Cell Reports 2024; 19:159-162. [PMID: 38278153 PMCID: PMC10874854 DOI: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2023.12.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2023] [Revised: 12/18/2023] [Accepted: 12/20/2023] [Indexed: 01/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Patients and their families routinely use the Internet to learn about stem cell research. What they find, is increasingly influenced by ongoing changes in how information is filtered and presented online. This article reflects on recent developments in generative artificial intelligence and how the stem cell community should respond.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Klaus Hoeyer
- Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Kali Barawi
- Centre for Trials Research, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Cheney Drew
- Centre for Trials Research, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Anders Grundtvig
- Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Emma Lane
- School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Anders Kristian Munk
- TANTlab, Department of Culture and Learning, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | | | - Megan Munsie
- Stem Cell Biology Theme, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pang PCI, Munsie M, Chang S. Using Google Analytics with Health Information-Seeking Model to Evaluate the Design of Health Information Websites. Stud Health Technol Inform 2024; 310:1046-1050. [PMID: 38269974 DOI: 10.3233/shti231124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2024]
Abstract
Health information websites can be useful for information seekers, and their design is crucial for the success of accessing the needed information. While web analytical tools (e.g. Google Analytics) used by such websites can provide descriptive measures of users, there is a disconnection between this data and the current understanding of health information-seeking behaviour. In this work, we leverage a theoretical model to interpret the Google Analytics data. Drawn on the visualisation of user behaviours based on this model, our research shows that better website design can be informed, and the evaluation of health websites can be performed on the basis of different user profiles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Megan Munsie
- Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Australia
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Australia
| | - Shanton Chang
- School of Computing and Information Systems, The University of Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Abstract
Increasingly advanced in vitro stem-cell-derived human embryo models raise novel ethical questions and shed a light on long-standing questions regarding research on human embryos.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nienke de Graeff
- Department of Medical Ethics & Health Law, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands.
| | - Lien De Proost
- Department of Medical Ethics & Health Law, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands
- Developmental Biology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Megan Munsie
- Stem Cell Biology Theme, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lieschke K, Scott V, Delatycki MB, Lewis S, Munsie M, Tanner C, Corben LA. How Great a Risk Do You Take? A Qualitative Study Exploring Attitudes of Individuals with Friedreich Ataxia Toward Gene Therapy. Hum Gene Ther 2023; 34:1041-1048. [PMID: 37624740 DOI: 10.1089/hum.2023.088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Scientists and pharmaceutical companies are working toward delivering gene therapy (GT) for Friedreich ataxia (FRDA). Understanding the views of people with lived experience of FRDA and their parents toward GT is essential to inform trial design and identify potential barriers to participation in clinical trials. The goals of this study were to identify the attitudes toward GT held by individuals with FRDA and parents of individuals with FRDA, and to explore how these may impact future trials for this condition. Audiorecorded, semistructured, qualitative interviews with 19 Australians explored experiences of FRDA, knowledge about clinical trials, views on GT, including risks and benefits, and potential barriers to participation in trials. Participants included thirteen individuals living with FRDA aged between 15-43 years, and six parents of children with FRDA aged 4-12 years of age. Thematic analysis of the interviews identified six main themes. Findings from this study indicate there is strong desire for information regarding GT in FRDA, however the current level of uncertainty around GT makes decision making challenging. The desire to maintain functional status and avoid additional risk of deterioration from an investigational treatment was apparent. Importantly, neurological targets were identified as preferred for GT trials. Further research is required to identify if attitudes and perceptions differ according to geographical location and disease stage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine Lieschke
- Bruce Lefroy Center for Genetic Health Research, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Australia
| | - Varlli Scott
- Bruce Lefroy Center for Genetic Health Research, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Australia
| | - Martin B Delatycki
- Bruce Lefroy Center for Genetic Health Research, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Australia
- Department of Pediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
- Monash Institute of Cognitive and Clinical Neurosciences, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
| | - Sharon Lewis
- Department of Pediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
- Department of Reproductive Epidemiology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - Megan Munsie
- Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Australia
| | - Claire Tanner
- Department of Sociology, School of Social Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
| | - Louise A Corben
- Bruce Lefroy Center for Genetic Health Research, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Australia
- Department of Pediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
- Monash Institute of Cognitive and Clinical Neurosciences, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ikonomou L, Cuende N, Forte M, Grilley BJ, Levine AD, Munsie M, Rasko JEJ, Turner L, Bidkhori HR, Ciccocioppo R, Grignon F, Srivastava A, Weiss DJ, Zettler P, Levine BL. International Society for Cell & Gene Therapy Position Paper: Key considerations to support evidence-based cell and gene therapies and oppose marketing of unproven products. Cytotherapy 2023; 25:920-929. [PMID: 37517865 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcyt.2023.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2022] [Revised: 03/05/2023] [Accepted: 03/06/2023] [Indexed: 08/01/2023]
Abstract
The field of regenerative medicine, including cellular immunotherapies, is on a remarkable growth trajectory. Dozens of cell-, tissue- and gene-based products have received marketing authorization worldwide while hundreds-to-thousands are either in preclinical development or under clinical investigation in phased clinical trials. However, the promise of regenerative therapies has also given rise to a global industry of direct-to-consumer offerings of prematurely commercialized cell and cell-based products with unknown safety and efficacy profiles. Since its inception, the International Society for Cell & Gene Therapy Committee on the Ethics of Cell and Gene Therapy has opposed the premature commercialization of unproven cell- and gene-based interventions and supported the development of evidence-based advanced therapy products. In the present Guide, targeted at International Society for Cell & Gene Therapy members, we analyze this industry, focusing in particular on distinctive features of unproven cell and cell-based products and the use of tokens of scientific legitimacy as persuasive marketing devices. We also provide an overview of reporting mechanisms for patients who believe they have been harmed by administration of unapproved and unproven products and suggest practical strategies to address the direct-to-consumer marketing of such products. Development of this Guide epitomizes our continued support for the ethical and rigorous development of cell and cell-based products with patient safety and therapeutic benefit as guiding principles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laertis Ikonomou
- Department of Oral Biology, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, New York, USA; Cell, Gene and Tissue Engineering Center, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, New York, USA.
| | - Natividad Cuende
- Andalusian Transplant Coordination, Servicio Andaluz de Salud; Sevilla, Spain
| | | | - Bambi J Grilley
- Center for Cell and Gene Therapy, Baylor College of Medicine, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA; Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Aaron D Levine
- School of Public Policy, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Megan Munsie
- Melbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - John E J Rasko
- Gene and Stem Cell Therapy Program Centenary Institute, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Cell & Molecular Therapies, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Leigh Turner
- Department of Health, Society, and Behavior, Program in Public Health; Stem Cell Research Center; Institute for Clinical and Translational Science; Department of Family Medicine; University of California, Irvine; Irvine, California, USA
| | - Hamid R Bidkhori
- Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine Research Department, Academic Center for Education, Culture and Research (ACECR)-Khorasan Razavi, Mashhad, Iran
| | - Rachele Ciccocioppo
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Medicine, A.O.U.I. Policlinico G.B. Rossi & University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Felix Grignon
- International Society for Cell & Gene Therapy, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Alok Srivastava
- Department of Haematology, Christian Medical College, Ranipet Campus, Ranipet & Centre for Stem Cell Research (a unit of inStem Bengaluru) CMC Campus, Vellore, India
| | - Daniel J Weiss
- University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington, Vermont, USA
| | - Patricia Zettler
- Moritz College of Law, Drug Enforcement and Policy Center, Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Bruce L Levine
- Center for Cellular Immunotherapies, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, The University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Pang PCI, Munsie M, Chang S, Tanner C, Walker C. Participatory Design and Evaluation of the "Stem Cells Australia" Website for Delivering Complex Health Knowledge: Mixed Methods Study. J Med Internet Res 2023; 25:e44733. [PMID: 37471121 PMCID: PMC10401697 DOI: 10.2196/44733] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2022] [Revised: 03/20/2023] [Accepted: 06/17/2023] [Indexed: 07/21/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The internet has become a commonly used information source for people seeking to understand their health care options. However, inconsistent representation about what stem cell treatments are available and from whom, coupled with the lack of transparency about what has been shown to work or is even safe, can distract and mislead users. Given these challenges, there is a need to develop effective evidence-based tools for delivering information about health care options involving stem cells. OBJECTIVE A need to redesign an existing website in Australia was identified to provide trustworthy information about stem cell research and to counter misinformation. Using a participatory design approach to generate an understanding of what information users need for stem cell treatments, the Stem Cells Australia website serves as a case study for the development and evaluation of websites delivering complex messages about science and health. METHODS This study comprised 3 steps. First, a focus group and several one-on-one interviews with a purposive sample of users (n=12) were conducted to identify their needs and requirements. Second, we designed a new version of the website based on findings from the focus group and interviews. Finally, for evaluating the participatory design process, we collected 180 days of Google Analytics data for both the original and redesigned versions (90 days for each) and compared their differences using 2-sample z tests. RESULTS The feedback from participants was grouped into 3 themes-needed and unwanted information, how and where to obtain information, and their information preferences. These were translated into requirements for rebuilding the website. The redesigned version reached users in other continents, despite the daily numbers of users (-61.2%; P<.001) and sessions (-61.7%; P<.001) decreasing. The redesigned version also showed substantial decrease in daily bounce rate (-97.2%; P<.001), significant increase in the daily average of page reads per session (+110.8%; P<.001), and long daily average for session duration (+22.9%; P=.045). Navigation flow analysis showed more traffic toward web pages related to health conditions in the redesigned version. CONCLUSIONS Websites about stem cell research need to provide content for vulnerable global audiences. Participatory design that addresses knowledge gaps and information needs can produce better performance and engagement, which can be evaluated using Google Analytics, a common web analytics tool used by many websites. Learnings for improving the metrics regarding website identity, research updates, and clinical trials are concluded, which can inform the future design of websites seeking to engage users and provide reliable and accessible science and health information including but not limited to stem cell research and therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Megan Munsie
- Melbourne Medical School, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
- Stem Cell Ethics and Policy Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Shanton Chang
- School of Computing and Information Systems, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - Claire Tanner
- School of Social Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Christine Walker
- Melbourne Medical School, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Gyngell C, Munsie M, Fujita M, Thiessen C, Savulescu J, Konstantinov I. Ethical analysis of the first porcine cardiac xenotransplantation. J Med Ethics 2023:jme-2022-108685. [PMID: 37348929 DOI: 10.1136/jme-2022-108685] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2022] [Accepted: 05/26/2023] [Indexed: 06/24/2023]
Abstract
In this article, we provide an ethical analysis of the first porcine cardiac xenotransplant, performed in Maryland, USA in early 2022. David Bennett was offered the experimental procedure after he was deemed ineligible for human heart transplantation and mechanical circulatory support, based on a history of non-compliance. It was reported that Mr Bennett's previous instances of non-compliance were for medically non-life-threatening conditions years earlier, where the risks of non-compliance were not as high. We argue that, in Mr Bennett's case, a history of non-compliance in a different context, should not necessarily rule him ineligible for a potentially life-saving treatment now. Furthermore, using previous non-compliance to exclude individuals from donor organs may have the unintended effect of placing the burden of testing xenotransplantation on those who are already disadvantaged. We then argue that it is not enough to rely on patient consent to ethically justify xenotransplantation research. Taking a broad ethical perspective is crucial when mapping a clinical pathway for xenotransplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher Gyngell
- Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne - Parkville Campus, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Biomedical Ethics Research Group, MCRI, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Megan Munsie
- Stem Cell Ethics & Policy Group, MCRI, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Melbourne Medical School, The University of Melbourne - Parkville Campus, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Misao Fujita
- Uehiro Research Division for iPS Cell Ethics, Kyoto University Center for iPS Cell Research and Application, Kyoto, Japan
- Institute for the Advanced Study of Human Biology (WPI-ASHBi), Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Carrie Thiessen
- Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Julian Savulescu
- Biomedical Ethics Research Group, MCRI, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Faculty of Philosophy, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Igor Konstantinov
- Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne - Parkville Campus, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- The Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Heart Group, MCRI, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Sugarman J, Clark A, Fishkin J, Kato K, McCormack K, Munsie M, Peluso MJ, René N, Solomon SL. Critical considerations for public engagement in stem cell-related research. Stem Cell Reports 2023; 18:420-426. [PMID: 36736324 PMCID: PMC10242349 DOI: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2023.01.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2022] [Revised: 12/28/2022] [Accepted: 01/03/2023] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Public engagement is increasingly recognized as being integral to basic and translational research. Public engagement involves effective communication about research along with the mutual exchange of views and opinions among a wide variety of members in society. As such, public engagement can help to identify issues that must be addressed in order for research to be ethically sound and trustworthy. It is especially critical in research that potentially raises ethical concerns, for example research involving embryos, germline genome editing, stigmatized conditions, and marginalized communities. Therefore, it is not surprising that there have been prominent recent calls for public engagement in the emerging sciences. However, given that there is arguably little agreement about how this should be done and the best ways of doing so, those involved with planning and implementing public engagement can benefit from understanding a broad range of prior experiences on related issues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeremy Sugarman
- Berman Institute of Bioethics and Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, 1809 Ashland Avenue, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| | - Amander Clark
- Department of Molecular Cell and Developmental Biology and Center for Reproductive Science, Health and Education, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - James Fishkin
- Department of Communication and Deliberative Democracy Lab, Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Kazuto Kato
- Department of Biomedical Ethics and Public Policy, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Japan
| | - Kevin McCormack
- California Institute for Regenerative Medicine, South San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Megan Munsie
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute and Melbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Michael J Peluso
- Division of HIV, Infectious Diseases, and Global Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | - Susan L Solomon
- New York Stem Cell Foundation Research Institute, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Munsie M. Pulling the plug on the stem cell hype. Med J Aust 2022. [DOI: 10.5694/mja2.51594] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
10
|
Levine BL, Munsie M, Levine AD, Ikonomou L. The peril of the promise of speculative cell banking: Statement from the ISCT Committee on the Ethics of Cell and Gene Therapy. Cytotherapy 2022; 24:977-978. [PMID: 35193823 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcyt.2022.01.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2022] [Accepted: 01/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Bruce L Levine
- Center for Cellular Immunotherapies, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
| | - Megan Munsie
- Melbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne and Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Australia
| | - Aaron D Levine
- School of Public Policy, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA
| | - Laertis Ikonomou
- Department of Oral Biology, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York; Buffalo, NY; Chair, ISCT Committee on the Ethics of Cell and Gene Therapy, https://www.isctglobal.org/about/isct-committees/ecgt
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Smith C, Crowley A, Munsie M, Behfar A, DeMartino ES, Staff NP, Shapiro SA, Master Z. Academic Physician Specialists' Approaches to Counseling Patients Interested in Unproven Stem Cell and Regenerative Therapies-A Qualitative Analysis. Mayo Clin Proc 2021; 96:3086-3096. [PMID: 34454715 DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2021.06.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2021] [Revised: 05/26/2021] [Accepted: 06/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To explore the experiences, approaches, and challenges of physicians consulting patients about experimental stem cell and regenerative medicine interventions (SCRIs). PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS From August 21, 2018, through July 30, 2019, semistructured interviews of 25 specialists in cardiology, ophthalmology, orthopedics, pulmonology, and neurology were conducted and qualitatively analyzed using modified grounded theory. RESULTS All specialists used informational approaches to counsel patients, especially orthopedists. Informational approaches included explaining stem cell science, sharing risks, and providing principles. Several specialists also used relational counseling approaches including emphasizing that physicians want what is best for patients, acknowledging suffering, reassuring continued care, empathizing with patients and families, and underscoring that patients have the final decision. Many specialists reported being comfortable with the conversation, although some were less comfortable and several noted challenges in the consultation including wanting to support a patient's decision but worrying about harms from unproven SCRIs, navigating family pressure, and addressing stem cell hype and unrealistic expectations. Specialists also desired that additional resources be available for them and patients. CONCLUSION Physicians relied more heavily on providing patients with information about SCRIs than using relational counseling approaches. Efforts should be directed at helping physicians address the informational and relational needs of patients, including providing tools and resources that inform physicians about the unproven SCRI industry, building skills in empathic communication, and the creation and dissemination of evidence-based resources to offer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cambray Smith
- University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Aidan Crowley
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Megan Munsie
- School of Biomedical Sciences and Melbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Atta Behfar
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Center for Regenerative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Erin S DeMartino
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Biomedical Ethics Research Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | - Shane A Shapiro
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Center for Regenerative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL
| | - Zubin Master
- Center for Regenerative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Biomedical Ethics Research Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Turner L, Munsie M, Levine AD, Ikonomou L. Ethical issues and public communication in the development of cell-based treatments for COVID-19: Lessons from the pandemic. Stem Cell Reports 2021; 16:2567-2576. [PMID: 34653406 PMCID: PMC8516140 DOI: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2021.09.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2021] [Revised: 09/13/2021] [Accepted: 09/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
The significant morbidity and mortality of coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) prompted a global race to develop new therapies. These include interventions using cell- or cell-derived products, several of which are being tested in well-designed, properly controlled clinical trials. Yet, the search for cell-based COVID-19 treatments has also been fraught with hyperbolic claims; flouting of crucial regulatory, scientific, and ethical norms; and distorted communication of research findings. In this paper, we critically examine ethical issues and public communication challenges related to the development of cell-based therapeutics for COVID-19. Drawing on the lessons learned from this ongoing process, we argue against the rushed development of cell-based interventions. We conclude by outlining ways to improve the ethical conduct of cell-based clinical investigations and public communication of therapeutic claims.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leigh Turner
- Department of Health, Society, and Behavior, Program in Public Health and Stem Cell Research Center, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA
| | - Megan Munsie
- School of Biomedical Sciences and Melbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - Aaron D Levine
- School of Public Policy, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Laertis Ikonomou
- Department of Oral Biology, School of Dental Medicine, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, 619 Biomedical Research Building (BRB), South Campus, Buffalo, NY 14214-8024, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Rudge C, Ghinea N, Munsie M, Stewart C. Regulating autologous stem cell interventions in Australia: updated review of the direct-to-consumer advertising restrictions. AUST HEALTH REV 2021; 45:507-515. [PMID: 33952390 DOI: 10.1071/ah20217] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2020] [Accepted: 11/11/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Objective This paper provides an update and overview of the law governing direct-to-consumer (DTC) advertising of autologous stem cell interventions (ASCIs) in Australia. It follows significant changes to the advertising regulations made in 2018. Methods The paper reviews the three primary sources or 'centres' of law regulating ASCIs in Australia, together with the relevant guidance documents that supplement these sources. It provides analysis of how the post-2018 advertising regulations, contained in the Therapeutic Goods Act 1989 (Cwlth), apply to all 'biologicals', including ASCIs. It demonstrates how these three sources of law interact with one another and outlines the new tiered offence regime that applies to contraventions of these prohibitions. Results The analysis demonstrates that DTC advertising of ASCIs in Australia is strictly controlled, with primary legislation prohibiting the advertising of biologicals altogether. Conclusions The polycentric legal regime regulating biologicals in Australia clearly makes DTC advertising of ASCIs unlawful. Health practitioners who promote ASCIs, either online, in print or in other media forms, may be penalised in different ways and by different authorities. What is known about the topic? Although several analyses have examined the regulation of ASCIs in Australia, no analysis has studied the reforms made in 2018 relating to the advertising of biologicals. As such, this analysis contributes a fresh examination of these relatively recent reforms. What does this paper add? This analysis clarifies the effects of these new advertising regulations, providing clear guidance on the relevant legal provisions for the benefit of health practitioners and health professionals more generally. What are the implications for practitioners? Health practitioners, especially those who offer ASCIs, should be aware that civil and criminal penalties are likely to be imposed on individuals who promote biologicals in Australia by any means.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chris Rudge
- Department of Anatomy and Neuroscience, The University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia. ; and Corresponding author.
| | - Narcyz Ghinea
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
| | - Megan Munsie
- Department of Anatomy and Neuroscience, The University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia.
| | - Cameron Stewart
- Faculty of Law, Rm No 337, New Law Building, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Lovell-Badge R, Anthony E, Barker RA, Bubela T, Brivanlou AH, Carpenter M, Charo RA, Clark A, Clayton E, Cong Y, Daley GQ, Fu J, Fujita M, Greenfield A, Goldman SA, Hill L, Hyun I, Isasi R, Kahn J, Kato K, Kim JS, Kimmelman J, Knoblich JA, Mathews D, Montserrat N, Mosher J, Munsie M, Nakauchi H, Naldini L, Naughton G, Niakan K, Ogbogu U, Pedersen R, Rivron N, Rooke H, Rossant J, Round J, Saitou M, Sipp D, Steffann J, Sugarman J, Surani A, Takahashi J, Tang F, Turner L, Zettler PJ, Zhai X. ISSCR Guidelines for Stem Cell Research and Clinical Translation: The 2021 update. Stem Cell Reports 2021; 16:1398-1408. [PMID: 34048692 PMCID: PMC8190668 DOI: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2021.05.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 110] [Impact Index Per Article: 36.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2021] [Revised: 05/16/2021] [Accepted: 05/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
The International Society for Stem Cell Research has updated its Guidelines for Stem Cell Research and Clinical Translation in order to address advances in stem cell science and other relevant fields, together with the associated ethical, social, and policy issues that have arisen since the last update in 2016. While growing to encompass the evolving science, clinical applications of stem cells, and the increasingly complex implications of stem cell research for society, the basic principles underlying the Guidelines remain unchanged, and they will continue to serve as the standard for the field and as a resource for scientists, regulators, funders, physicians, and members of the public, including patients. A summary of the key updates and issues is presented here.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Eric Anthony
- International Society for Stem Cell Research, Skokie, IL, USA
| | - Roger A Barker
- Cambridge Center for Brain Repair and WT-MRC Stem Cell Institute, Cambridge, UK
| | | | | | | | - R Alta Charo
- University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Amander Clark
- University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Steve A Goldman
- University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA; University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Insoo Hyun
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | - Jeffrey Kahn
- Berman Institute of Bioethics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Debra Mathews
- Berman Institute of Bioethics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Nuria Montserrat
- Institute for Bioengineering of Catalonia (IBEC), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jack Mosher
- International Society for Stem Cell Research, Skokie, IL, USA
| | - Megan Munsie
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Hiromitsu Nakauchi
- Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA; University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | | | - Kathy Niakan
- Francis Crick Institute, London, UK; Centre for Trophoblast Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | | | | | - Nicolas Rivron
- IMBA-Institute of Molecular Biotechnology, Vienna, Austria
| | | | | | - Jeff Round
- Institute of Health Economics, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | | | - Douglas Sipp
- RIKEN Center for Developmental Biology, Wako, Japan; Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Jeremy Sugarman
- Berman Institute of Bioethics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Azim Surani
- Gurdon Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Smith C, Crowley A, Munsie M, DeMartino ES, Staff NP, Shapiro S, Master Z. Academic physician specialists' views toward the unproven stem cell intervention industry: areas of common ground and divergence. Cytotherapy 2021; 23:348-356. [PMID: 33563545 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcyt.2020.12.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2020] [Revised: 12/27/2020] [Accepted: 12/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Premature commercialization of unproven stem cell interventions (SCIs) has received significant attention within the regenerative medicine community. Patients considering SCIs may encounter misinformation and seek out guidance from their physicians who are trusted brokers of health information. However, little is known about the perspectives of academic physician specialists toward the SCI industry. The purpose of this study was to capture the attitudes of physician specialists with experience addressing patient questions about unproven SCIs. METHODS The authors undertook 25 semi-structured interviews with academic physicians in cardiology, ophthalmology, orthopedics, pulmonology and neurology primarily from one academic center. RESULTS The authors identified two major themes: concerns and mediators of appropriateness of offering SCIs as therapies to patients. Specialists were generally aware of the industry and reported scientific and commercial concerns, including the scientific uncertainty of SCIs, medical harms to patients, misleading marketing and its impact on patient informed consent and economic harms due to large out-of-pocket costs for patients. All specialists outside of orthopedics voiced that it was inappropriate to be offering SCIs to patients today. These views were informed by previously expressed concerns surrounding safety and properly informing patients, levels of evidence needed prior to offering SCIs therapeutically and desired qualifications for clinicians. Among the specialties, orthopedists reported that under certain conditions, SCIs may be appropriate for patients with limited clinical options but only when safety is adequate, expectations are managed and patients are well informed about the risks and chances of benefit. Most participants expressed a desire for phase 3 studies and Food and Drug Administration approval prior to marketing SCIs, but some also shared the challenges associated with upholding these thresholds of evidence, especially when caring for out-of-option patients. CONCLUSIONS The authors' results suggest that medical specialists are aware of the industry and express several concerns surrounding SCIs but differ in their views on the appropriateness and clinical evidence necessary for offering SCIs currently to patients. Additional educational tools may help physicians with patient engagement and expectation management surrounding SCIs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cambray Smith
- Biomedical Ethics Research Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA; University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Aidan Crowley
- Department of Biological Sciences, College of Science, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana, USA
| | - Megan Munsie
- Department of Anatomy and Neuroscience, Centre for Stem Cell Systems, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - Erin S DeMartino
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine and Biomedical Ethics Research Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Nathan P Staff
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Shane Shapiro
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Center for Regenerative Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Zubin Master
- Biomedical Ethics Research Program and Center for Regenerative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Stewart C, Kerridge I, Waldby C, Lipworth W, Munsie M, Lysaght T, Rudge C, Ghinea N, Eckstein L, Neilsen J, Kaldor J, Nicol D. Unconventional Practice, "Innovative" Interventions and the National Law. J Law Med 2020; 27:574-589. [PMID: 32406622] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
This column explores a recent health profession disciplinary case which throws light on the problems of unconventional interventions by medical practitioners under the Health Practitioner Regulation National Law Act 2009 (Qld). The case involved "innovative" practices which were later found to have been scientifically unsupported, dangerous to patients and grounds for cancelling the health practitioner's registration. This column looks at common features of these kinds of cases in Australia and then examines recent attempts by the Medical Board of Australia to draft policy guidance around the use of unconventional practice in medicine. This column concludes with a number of changes to improve the effectiveness of the proposed policy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Catherine Waldby
- Research School of Social Sciences, Australian National University
| | | | | | - Tamra Lysaght
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics, National University of Singapore
| | - Christopher Rudge
- Postdoctoral Research Fellow, Sydney Health Law, University of Sydney
| | - Narcyz Ghinea
- Research Fellow, Sydney Health Ethics, University of Sydney
| | | | - Jane Neilsen
- Centre for Law and Genetics, University of Tasmania
| | - Jenny Kaldor
- Research Fellow, Centre for Law and Genetics, University of Tasmania
| | - Dianne Nicol
- Centre for Law and Genetics, University of Tasmania
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Ghinea N, Munsie M, Rudge C, Stewart C. Australian regulation of autologous human cell and tissue products: implications for commercial stem cell clinics. Regen Med 2020; 15:1361-1369. [DOI: 10.2217/rme-2019-0124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
In 2018, Australia’s Therapeutic Goods Administration introduced regulatory reforms that set stricter criteria around the regulation of products derived from a patient’s own cells and tissues, posing significant implications for clinics offering stem cell treatments. We review the regulatory framework and discuss its potential commercial implications, including the ambiguities that may arise from it in practice, as well as the likely impact it will have on product development and advertising practices in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Narcyz Ghinea
- Sydney Health Ethics, Faculty of Medicine & Health, The University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Sydney Law School, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Megan Munsie
- Centre for Stem Cell Systems, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry & Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Stem Cells Australia, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Cameron Stewart
- Sydney Law School, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Hyun I, Munsie M, Pera MF, Rivron NC, Rossant J. Toward Guidelines for Research on Human Embryo Models Formed from Stem Cells. Stem Cell Reports 2020; 14:169-174. [PMID: 31951813 PMCID: PMC7015820 DOI: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2019.12.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2019] [Revised: 12/06/2019] [Accepted: 12/12/2019] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Over the past few years, a number of research groups have reported striking progress on the generation of in vitro models from mouse and human stem cells that replicate aspects of early embryonic development. Not only do these models reproduce some key cell fate decisions but, especially in the mouse system, they also mimic the spatiotemporal arrangements of embryonic and extraembryonic tissues that are required for developmental patterning and implantation in the uterus. If such models could be developed for the early human embryo, they would have great potential benefits for understanding early human development, for biomedical science, and for reducing the use of animals and human embryos in research. However, guidelines for the ethical conduct of this line of work are at present not well defined. In this Forum article, we discuss some key aspects of this emerging area of research and provide some recommendations for its ethical oversight.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Insoo Hyun
- Department of Bioethics, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA; The Center for Bioethics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Megan Munsie
- Centre for Stem Cell Systems, School of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | | | - Nicolas C Rivron
- Institute of Molecular Biotechnology, Austrian Academy of Science, Vienna, Austria
| | - Janet Rossant
- Hospital for Sick Children and the Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Waldby C, Hendl T, Kerridge I, Lipworth W, Lysaght T, Munsie M, Stewart C. The direct-to-consumer market for stem cell-based interventions in Australia: exploring the experiences of patients. Regen Med 2020; 15:1238-1249. [DOI: 10.2217/rme-2019-0089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
The prevalence of businesses selling autologous stem cell-based interventions to patients in Australia has raised serious concerns about how weaknesses in regulation have enabled the emergence of an industry that engages in aggressive marketing of unproven treatments to patients. Little is known about how patients experience this marketing and their subsequent interactions with practitioners. This paper reports results from 15 semistructured interviews with patients and carers, and also draws upon discussion conducted with patients, carers and family members (22 participants) in a workshop setting. We explore how Australian patients and carers understand and experience these interventions, and how their presumptions about the ethics of medical practice, and the regulatory environment in Australia have conditioned their preparedness to undergo unproven treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine Waldby
- Research School of Social Sciences, College of Arts & Social Sciences, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
| | - Tereza Hendl
- Institute of Ethics, History & Theory of Medicine, Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich, Germany
| | - Ian Kerridge
- Sydney Health Ethics, Faculty of Medicine & Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Wendy Lipworth
- Sydney Health Ethics, Faculty of Medicine & Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Tamra Lysaght
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Megan Munsie
- Centre for Stem Cell Systems, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry & Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Stem Cells Australia, Melbourne, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Zarzeczny A, Tanner C, Barfoot J, Blackburn C, Couturier A, Munsie M. Contact us for more information: an analysis of public enquiries about stem cells. Regen Med 2019; 14:1137-1150. [DOI: 10.2217/rme-2019-0092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim: This study examines online enquiries received by two prominent stem cell science initiatives operating in different geographical jurisdictions. Materials & methods: Combined quantitative and qualitative analysis undertaken of internet-based queries (n = 1047) received by Stem Cells Australia and EuroStemCell from members of the public over a two-year period (May 2014–2016). Results: Findings reveal striking similarities between the two datasets and highlight the range of uncertainties, priorities and needs of those seeking information about stem cells online. Conclusion: Sustained and in-depth tailored guidance is needed to effectively meet the diverse stem cell-related information-based needs of communities internationally. Such efforts should be prioritized by regenerative medicine research initiatives and organizations, given the trust and hope diverse publics appear to place in these groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy Zarzeczny
- Johnson Shoyama Graduate School of Public Policy, University of Regina, Regina, SK, S4S 0A2, Canada
| | - Claire Tanner
- Department of Anatomy & Neuroscience, Center for Stem Cell Systems, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jan Barfoot
- EuroStemCell, MRC Centre for Regenerative Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH16 4UU, UK
| | - Clare Blackburn
- EuroStemCell, MRC Centre for Regenerative Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH16 4UU, UK
| | - Anna Couturier
- EuroStemCell, MRC Centre for Regenerative Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH16 4UU, UK
| | - Megan Munsie
- Department of Anatomy & Neuroscience, Center for Stem Cell Systems, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Petersen A, Tanner C, Munsie M. Navigating the cartographies of trust: how patients and carers establish the credibility of online treatment claims. Sociol Health Illn 2019; 41 Suppl 1:50-64. [PMID: 31599982 DOI: 10.1111/1467-9566.12872] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
Digital media offer citizens novel ways of 'enacting' health and illness, and treatment and care. However, while digital media may so 'empower' citizens, those searching for credible information will be confronted with various, often-conflicting claims that may have 'disempowering' effects. This article uses Gieryn's concept of the 'cultural cartography' to explore the criteria that patients and carers employ in establishing the credibility of information on alleged treatments. Drawing on data from interviews with Australian patients and carers who have travelled or considered travelling abroad for unproven commercial stem cell treatments, the article examines how individuals assess rival sources of epistemic authority - science-based and non-science-based - as they search for credible information. As we argue, in a context where conventional treatment options are perceived to be limited or non-existent - which is likely to be the case with those suffering severe, life-limiting conditions - and the credibility of sources uncertain, matters of opinion and belief are prone to being interpreted as matters of fact, with potentially far-reaching implications for citizens' health. Revealing the mechanisms by which individuals ascribe credibility to health information, we conclude, has become crucial as digital media assume a growing role in health and healthcare and governments encourage citizens to become 'digitally literate'.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alan Petersen
- Sociology and Gender Studies, School of Social Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
| | - Claire Tanner
- Department of Anatomy and Neuroscience, Centre for Stem Cell Systems, School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
| | - Megan Munsie
- Department of Anatomy and Neuroscience, Centre for Stem Cell Systems, School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Abstract
Digital technologies promise to transform practices of health, medicine and health care and 'power' economies. In expectation of their presumed future benefits, governments in recent years have invested heavily in new technology initiatives and have sought to engender 'digital literacy' among citizens. This article introduces papers and expands on themes arising from a special issue that explores the socio-ethical and regulatory implications of citizens' use of digital media to connect with health care. We set the scene by examining the promissory discourse that attaches to digital technologies as applied to health care, and its role in shaping actions, and then consider the longer term prospects and implications of digitalisation for conceptions of citizenship and established categories and distinctions. As we argue, given the history of new technologies, the longer term implications of digitalisation are likely to differ significantly from those envisaged. Digital technologies promise radical positive disruption. Yet many uncertainties accompany their development and future applications and likely implications. Making reference to papers in the special issue and the wider literature, the article considers the prospects of digitalisation in medicine and health care in light of the colonisation of the Internet by powerful technology companies, the shift in capitalist economies from processes of production to technologies of prediction, evidence of inequalities in access to the Internet and related devices, and the growing number of data breaches involving personal health information. We draw attention to the failure of governments to engage citizens in substantive deliberations about digitalisation and its future potential implications and the ultimate democratic deficit that this represents. We ask, what does it mean to 'regulate' digital media in a context in which data are widely viewed as the 'new oil'? While we have no straightforward answers, we suggest that recent legislative efforts (e.g. General Data Protection Regulation in Europe) and growing calls for 'algorithmic accountability' have the potential to temper the more harmful aspects of digitalisation.
Collapse
|
23
|
Waldby C, Hendl T, Munsie M, Lysaght T, Lipworth W, Kerridge I, Stewart C. Autologous stem cell-based interventions in Australia: exploring patient experience in light of regulatory exceptionalism. Cytotherapy 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jcyt.2019.03.324] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
24
|
Tanner C, Munsie M, Sipp D, Turner L, Wheatland C. The politics of evidence in online illness narratives: An analysis of crowdfunding for purported stem cell treatments. Health (London) 2019; 23:436-457. [DOI: 10.1177/1363459319829194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Doug Sipp
- RIKEN Center for Biosystems Dynamics Research, Japan
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Affiliation(s)
- Douglas Sipp
- Douglas Sipp is a researcher at RIKEN and project professor at Keio University, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Megan Munsie
- Megan Munsie is an associate professor in the School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.
| | - Jeremy Sugarman
- Jeremy Sugarman is a professor in the Berman Institute of Bioethics and the School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Bobba S, Di Girolamo N, Munsie M, Chen F, Pébay A, Harkin D, Hewitt AW, O'Connor M, McLenachan S, Shadforth AMA, Watson SL. The current state of stem cell therapy for ocular disease. Exp Eye Res 2018; 177:65-75. [PMID: 30029023 DOI: 10.1016/j.exer.2018.07.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2018] [Revised: 06/16/2018] [Accepted: 07/16/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Herein, we review the safety, efficacy, regulatory standards and ethical implications of the use of stem cells in ocular disease. A literature review was conducted, registered clinical trials reviewed, and expert opinions sought. Guidelines and codes of conduct from international societies and professional bodies were also reviewed. Collated data is presented on current progress in the field of ocular regenerative medicine, future challenges, the clinical trial process and ethical considerations in stem cell therapy. A greater understanding of the function and location of ocular stem cells has led to rapid advances in possible therapeutic applications. However, in the context of significant technical challenges and potential long-term complications, it is imperative that stem cell practices operate within formal clinical trial frameworks. While there remains broad scope for innovation, ongoing evidence-based review of potential interventions and the development of standardized protocols are necessary to ensure patient safety and best practice in ophthalmic care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samantha Bobba
- Prince of Wales Hospital Clinical School, High Street, Randwick, Sydney, New South Wales, 2031, Australia.
| | - Nick Di Girolamo
- School of Medical Sciences, University of New South Wales, Kensington, Sydney, New South Wales, 2052, Australia
| | - Megan Munsie
- Centre for Stem Cell Systems, School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, 3010, Australia
| | - Fred Chen
- Lions Eye Institute, 2 Verdun Street, Nedlands, Western Australia, 6009, Australia
| | - Alice Pébay
- Centre for Stem Cell Systems, School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, 3010, Australia; Centre for Eye Research Australia, Level 7/32 Gisborne Street, East Melbourne, Victoria, 3002, Australia
| | - Damien Harkin
- School of Biomedical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, 2 George Street, Brisbane, Queensland, 4000, Australia
| | - Alex W Hewitt
- Centre for Eye Research Australia, Level 7/32 Gisborne Street, East Melbourne, Victoria, 3002, Australia; School of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Churchill Avenue, Hobart, Tasmania, 7005, Australia
| | - Michael O'Connor
- School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Victoria Road Parramatta, New South Wales, Parramatta, 2150, Australia
| | - Samuel McLenachan
- Centre for Ophthalmology and Visual Science, University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, Western Australia, 6009, Australia
| | - Audra M A Shadforth
- School of Biomedical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, 2 George Street, Brisbane, Queensland, 4000, Australia
| | - Stephanie L Watson
- Prince of Wales Hospital Clinical School, High Street, Randwick, Sydney, New South Wales, 2031, Australia; Save Sight Institute, University of Sydney, 8 Macquarie Street, Sydney, New South Wales, 2000, Australia; Sydney Eye Hospital, 8 Macquarie Street, Sydney, New South Wales, 2000, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Munsie M, Gyngell C. Ethical issues in genetic modification and why application matters. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2018; 52:7-12. [PMID: 29800628 DOI: 10.1016/j.gde.2018.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2018] [Revised: 05/01/2018] [Accepted: 05/06/2018] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Advances in genome editing techniques have generated renewed interest in the ethical implications of genetic modification. In this article, we review the recent literature and discuss in detail ethical issues pertaining to the application of this technology to five areas; human embryo research, organoid research, the prospect of genetically modified babies, mitochondrial replacement therapy and the creation of chimeric organisms. We point to a central issue which cuts through these different areas: the need to clearly frame how using the technology provides benefit that cannot be met by other means. Failure to provide reasonable justification, and address how risks-if any-will be mitigated, is likely to erode public trust and undermine progress in medical research and its clinical translation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan Munsie
- Centre for Stem Cell Systems, School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.
| | - Christopher Gyngell
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute and University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Lysaght T, Munsie M, Hendl T, Tan L, Kerridge I, Stewart C. Selling stem cells with tokens of legitimacy: An analysis of websites in Japan and Australia. Cytotherapy 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jcyt.2018.02.218] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
|
29
|
Sipp D, Caulfield T, Kaye J, Barfoot J, Blackburn C, Chan S, De Luca M, Kent A, McCabe C, Munsie M, Sleeboom-Faulkner M, Sugarman J, van Zimmeren E, Zarzeczny A, Rasko JEJ. Marketing of unproven stem cell-based interventions: A call to action. Sci Transl Med 2018; 9:9/397/eaag0426. [PMID: 28679655 DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aag0426] [Citation(s) in RCA: 117] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2016] [Revised: 11/06/2016] [Accepted: 02/27/2017] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
Commercial promotion of unsupported therapeutic uses of stem cells is a global problem that has proven resistant to regulatory efforts. Here, we suggest a coordinated approach at the national and international levels focused on engagement, harmonization, and enforcement to reduce the risks associated with direct-to-consumer marketing of unproven stem cell treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Douglas Sipp
- Riken Center for Developmental Biology, 2-2-3 Minatojima Minamimachi, Kobe 650-0047, Japan. .,Department of Physiology, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan.,Global Initiatives, Keio University, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan.,Riken Center for Advanced Intelligence Project, 1-4-1 Nihonbashi, Chuo-ku, Tokyo 103-0027, Japan
| | - Timothy Caulfield
- Faculty of Law and School of Public Health, 461 Law Centre, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2H5, Canada.,Faculty of Law and School of Public Health, 461 Law Centre, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2H5, Canada
| | - Jane Kaye
- Department of Public Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Jan Barfoot
- Medical Research Council Centre for Regenerative Medicine, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, 5 Little France Drive, Edinburgh EH16 4UU, UK
| | - Clare Blackburn
- Medical Research Council Centre for Regenerative Medicine, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, 5 Little France Drive, Edinburgh EH16 4UU, UK
| | - Sarah Chan
- Usher Institute for Population Health Sciences and Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Nine Bioquarter, 9 Little France Road, Edinburgh EH16 4UX, UK
| | - Michele De Luca
- Center for Regenerative Medicine "Stefano Ferrari," Department of Life Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Via G. Gottardi 100, 41125 Modena, Italy
| | - Alastair Kent
- Genetic Alliance UK, Level 3 Barclay House, 37 Queen Square, London WC1N 3BH, UK
| | - Christopher McCabe
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Megan Munsie
- Centre for Stem Cell Systems, Department of Anatomy and Neuroscience, School of Biomedical Science, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Science, University of Melbourne, Level 2, Kenneth Myer Building, 30 Royal Parade Parkville, 3010 Victoria, Australia.,Education, Ethics, Law and Community Awareness Unit, Stem Cells Australia, University of Melbourne, Level 2, Kenneth Myer Building, 30 Royal Parade Parkville, 3010 Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Jeremy Sugarman
- Berman Institute of Bioethics and Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| | - Esther van Zimmeren
- University of Antwerp, Faculty of Law, Research Group Government and Law, Venusstraat 23, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Amy Zarzeczny
- Johnson Shoyama Graduate School of Public Policy, University of Regina, 110-2 Research Drive, Regina, Saskatchewan S4S 7H1, Canada
| | - John E J Rasko
- Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia. .,Gene and Stem Cell Therapy Program, Centenary Institute, Sydney, Australia.,Department of Cell and Molecular Therapies, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Level 2, Building 89, Missenden Road, Camperdown, New South Wales 2050, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Munsie M, Lysaght T, Hendl T, Tan HYL, Kerridge I, Stewart C. Open for business: a comparative study of websites selling autologous stem cells in Australia and Japan. Regen Med 2017; 12:777-790. [PMID: 29125016 DOI: 10.2217/rme-2017-0070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Aim: This article examines online marketing practices of Japanese and Australian clinics offering putative autologous stem cell treatments. Materials & methods: We conducted google searches for keywords related to stem cell therapy and stem cell clinics in English and Japanese. Results: We identified websites promoting 88 point-of-sale clinics in Japan and 70 in Australia. Conclusion: Our findings provide further evidence of the rapid global growth in clinics offering unproven stem cell interventions. We also show that these clinics adopt strategies to promote their services as though they are consistent with evidentiary and ethical standards of science, research and medicine. Unless addressed, these practices risk harming not only vulnerable patients but also undermining public trust in science and medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan Munsie
- Centre for Stem Cell Systems, School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - Tamra Lysaght
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 119228, Singapore
| | - Tereza Hendl
- Center for Values, Ethics & the Law in Medicine, University of Sydney, Australia
| | - Hui-Yin Lynn Tan
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 119228, Singapore
| | - Ian Kerridge
- Center for Values, Ethics & the Law in Medicine, University of Sydney, Australia.,Hematology Department, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, Sydney, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Lysaght T, Lipworth W, Hendl T, Kerridge I, Lee TL, Munsie M, Waldby C, Stewart C. The deadly business of an unregulated global stem cell industry. J Med Ethics 2017; 43:744-746. [PMID: 28356490 DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2016-104046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2016] [Accepted: 03/09/2017] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
In 2016, the Office of the State Coroner of New South Wales released its report into the death of an Australian woman, Sheila Drysdale, who had died from complications of an autologous stem cell procedure at a Sydney clinic. In this report, we argue that Mrs Drysdale's death was avoidable, and it was the result of a pernicious global problem of an industry exploiting regulatory systems to sell unproven and unjustified interventions with stem cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tamra Lysaght
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics, Clinical Research Centre, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Wendy Lipworth
- Centre for Values Ethics and the Law in Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Tereza Hendl
- Centre for Values Ethics and the Law in Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Ian Kerridge
- Centre for Values Ethics and the Law in Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Haematology Department, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Tsung-Ling Lee
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics, Clinical Research Centre, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Megan Munsie
- Stem Cells Australia, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Catherine Waldby
- College of Arts and Social Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Tanner C, Petersen A, Munsie M. ‘No one here's helping me, what do you do?’: addressing patient need for support and advice about stem cell treatments. Regen Med 2017; 12:791-801. [DOI: 10.2217/rme-2017-0056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim: This article examines how those who contemplate purported stem cell treatments (SCTs) negotiate available information sources and the adequacy of current approaches to guidance and support. Materials & methods: Qualitative interviews undertaken with people who had contemplated or undergone purported SCTs for a range of conditions (n = 24 and n = 27, respectively), as well as professionals who are frequently asked about SCTs (n = 20) were analyzed. Results: Our findings reveal the difficulties for individuals in discriminating between different sources of information on SCTs and the limitations of current responses. Conclusion: In the context of contending information about SCTs informal (‘accidental’) advisors potentially play a crucial role in supporting patients. Additional approaches are also required to better address patients’ needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire Tanner
- Department of Anatomy & Neuroscience, Center for Stem Cell Systems, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Alan Petersen
- Sociology, School of Social Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Megan Munsie
- Department of Anatomy & Neuroscience, Center for Stem Cell Systems, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Abstract
Research involving human organoids and gastruloids involves ethical issues associated with their derivation as well as their current and future uses. These include unique issues related to the extent of maturation that can be achieved in vitro or through chimeric research, as well as fundamental ethical considerations such as those concerning the provenance of human biomaterials and the use of gene-editing technologies. Many of these issues are not specifically addressed by existing ethics oversight mechanisms, but these mechanisms might be easily extended to help ensure that human organoid and related research moves forward in an ethically appropriate manner.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan Munsie
- Department of Anatomy and Neuroscience, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia
| | - Insoo Hyun
- Department of Bioethics, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
| | - Jeremy Sugarman
- Berman Institute of Bioethics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Morrison M, Bell J, George C, Harmon S, Munsie M, Kaye J. The European General Data Protection Regulation: challenges and considerations for iPSC researchers and biobanks. Regen Med 2017; 12:693-703. [PMID: 28976812 PMCID: PMC5857917 DOI: 10.2217/rme-2017-0068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2017] [Accepted: 07/26/2017] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Increasingly, human induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC) and their associated genetic and clinical information are being used in a wide range of applications, with large biobanks being established to support and increase their scientific use. The new European General Data Protection Regulations, which comes into effect in 2018, will have implications for biobanks that generate, store and allow research access to iPSC. This paper describes some of the challenges that iPSC biobanks face and suggests some points for the development of appropriate governance structures to address these new requirements. These suggestions also have implications for iPSC research in general.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Morrison
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, HeLEX – Center for Health, Law & Emerging Technologies, University of Oxford, Ewert House, Ewert Place, Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 7DD, UK
| | - Jessica Bell
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, HeLEX – Center for Health, Law & Emerging Technologies, University of Oxford, Ewert House, Ewert Place, Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 7DD, UK
- Melbourne Law School, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
| | - Carol George
- School of Law, Kenyon Mason Institute for Medicine, Life Sciences & Law, University of Edinburgh, Old College, South Bridge, Edinburgh EH8 9YL, UK
| | - Shawn Harmon
- School of Law, Kenyon Mason Institute for Medicine, Life Sciences & Law, University of Edinburgh, Old College, South Bridge, Edinburgh EH8 9YL, UK
| | - Megan Munsie
- Department of Anatomy & Neuroscience, Stem Cells Center for Stem Cell Systems, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
| | - Jane Kaye
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, HeLEX – Center for Health, Law & Emerging Technologies, University of Oxford, Ewert House, Ewert Place, Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 7DD, UK
- Melbourne Law School, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Lee TL, Lysaght T, Lipworth W, Hendl T, Kerridge I, Munsie M, Stewart C. Regulating the stem cell industry: needs and responsibilities. Bull World Health Organ 2017; 95:663-664. [PMID: 28867848 PMCID: PMC5578385 DOI: 10.2471/blt.16.189977] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2016] [Revised: 06/07/2017] [Accepted: 06/20/2017] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Tsung-Ling Lee
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics, Clinical Research Centre, National University of Singapore, #02-03, 10 Medical Drive, 117597 Singapore
| | - Tamra Lysaght
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics, Clinical Research Centre, National University of Singapore, #02-03, 10 Medical Drive, 117597 Singapore
| | - Wendy Lipworth
- Centre for Values, Ethics and the Law in Medicine, Sydney, University of Sydney, Australia
| | - Tereza Hendl
- Centre for Values, Ethics and the Law in Medicine, Sydney, University of Sydney, Australia
| | - Ian Kerridge
- Centre for Values, Ethics and the Law in Medicine, Sydney, University of Sydney, Australia
| | - Megan Munsie
- Stem Cells Australia, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
McCaughey T, Liang HH, Chen C, Fenwick E, Rees G, Wong RCB, Vickers JC, Summers MJ, MacGregor C, Craig JE, Munsie M, Pébay A, Hewitt AW. An Interactive Multimedia Approach to Improving Informed Consent for Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Research. Cell Stem Cell 2016; 18:307-8. [PMID: 26942850 DOI: 10.1016/j.stem.2016.02.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Tristan McCaughey
- Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital; University of Melbourne, Department of Surgery, 3002, VIC, Australia; Department of Surgery, School of Clinical Science at Monash Health, Monash University, 3800, VIC, Australia; Menzies Institute for Medical Research, School of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, 7000, TAS, Australia
| | - Helena H Liang
- Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital; University of Melbourne, Department of Surgery, 3002, VIC, Australia
| | - Christine Chen
- Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital; University of Melbourne, Department of Surgery, 3002, VIC, Australia; Department of Surgery, School of Clinical Science at Monash Health, Monash University, 3800, VIC, Australia
| | - Eva Fenwick
- Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital; University of Melbourne, Department of Surgery, 3002, VIC, Australia
| | - Gwyneth Rees
- Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital; University of Melbourne, Department of Surgery, 3002, VIC, Australia
| | - Raymond C B Wong
- Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital; University of Melbourne, Department of Surgery, 3002, VIC, Australia
| | - James C Vickers
- Wicking Dementia Research and Education Centre and School of Medicine, University of Tasmania, 7000, TAS, Australia
| | - Mathew J Summers
- Wicking Dementia Research and Education Centre and School of Medicine, University of Tasmania, 7000, TAS, Australia; School of Social Sciences, University of the Sunshine Coast, Sippy Downs, 4556, QLD, Australia
| | - Casimir MacGregor
- School of Social Science, Monash University, Melbourne, 3800, VIC, Australia
| | - Jamie E Craig
- Department of Ophthalmology, Flinders University of South Australia, Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, 5024, SA, Australia
| | - Megan Munsie
- Stem Cells Australia, Department of Anatomy and Neuroscience, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, 3052, VIC, Australia
| | - Alice Pébay
- Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital; University of Melbourne, Department of Surgery, 3002, VIC, Australia
| | - Alex W Hewitt
- Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital; University of Melbourne, Department of Surgery, 3002, VIC, Australia; Menzies Institute for Medical Research, School of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, 7000, TAS, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Daley GQ, Hyun I, Apperley JF, Barker RA, Benvenisty N, Bredenoord AL, Breuer CK, Caulfield T, Cedars MI, Frey-Vasconcells J, Heslop HE, Jin Y, Lee RT, McCabe C, Munsie M, Murry CE, Piantadosi S, Rao M, Rooke HM, Sipp D, Studer L, Sugarman J, Takahashi M, Zimmerman M, Kimmelman J. Setting Global Standards for Stem Cell Research and Clinical Translation: The 2016 ISSCR Guidelines. Stem Cell Reports 2016; 6:787-797. [PMID: 27185282 PMCID: PMC4912385 DOI: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2016.05.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 136] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
The International Society for Stem Cell Research (ISSCR) presents its 2016 Guidelines for Stem Cell Research and Clinical Translation (ISSCR, 2016). The 2016 guidelines reflect the revision and extension of two past sets of guidelines (ISSCR, 2006; ISSCR, 2008) to address new and emerging areas of stem cell discovery and application and evolving ethical, social, and policy challenges. These guidelines provide an integrated set of principles and best practices to drive progress in basic, translational, and clinical research. The guidelines demand rigor, oversight, and transparency in all aspects of practice, providing confidence to practitioners and public alike that stem cell science can proceed efficiently and remain responsive to public and patient interests. Here, we highlight key elements and recommendations in the guidelines and summarize the recommendations and deliberations behind them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- George Q Daley
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Boston Children's Hospital and Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
| | - Insoo Hyun
- Department of Bioethics, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
| | - Jane F Apperley
- Centre for Hematology, Imperial College, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, London W12 0NN, UK
| | - Roger A Barker
- John van Geest Centre for Brain Repair, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Cambridge CB2 0PY, UK
| | - Nissim Benvenisty
- Department of Genetics, The Azrieli Center for Stem Cells and Genetic Research, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 91904, Israel
| | - Annelien L Bredenoord
- Department of Medical Humanities, Julius Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Christopher K Breuer
- Center for Cardiovascular Research, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH 43215, USA
| | - Timothy Caulfield
- Health Law Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2H5, Canada
| | - Marcelle I Cedars
- University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA
| | | | - Helen E Heslop
- Center for Cell & Gene Therapy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital and Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Ying Jin
- Institute of Health Science, Shanghai JiaoTong University School of Medicine/Shanghai Institutes of Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, 200025, China
| | - Richard T Lee
- Harvard Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge MA 02138, USA
| | - Christopher McCabe
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2B7, Canada
| | - Megan Munsie
- Education, Ethics, Law & Community Awareness Unit, Stem Cells Australia, Department of Anatomy and Neuroscience, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
| | - Charles E Murry
- Departments of Pathology, Bioengineering and Medicine/Cardiology, Institute for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, Center for Cardiovascular Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98109, USA
| | - Steven Piantadosi
- Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA
| | - Mahendra Rao
- The New York Stem Cell Foundation Research Institute, New York, NY 10023, USA; Q Therapeutics, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, USA
| | - Heather M Rooke
- International Society for Stem Cell Research, Skokie, IL 60077, USA
| | - Douglas Sipp
- RIKEN Center for Developmental Biology, Kobe, 650-0047 Japan; Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, 160-8582 Japan
| | - Lorenz Studer
- Center for Stem Cell Biology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Jeremy Sugarman
- Johns Hopkins Berman Institute of Bioethics, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| | - Masayo Takahashi
- Center for Developmental Biology, RIKEN, Kobe, Hyogo 650-0047, Japan
| | | | - Jonathan Kimmelman
- Biomedical Ethics Unit, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 1X1, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
McCaughey T, Chen CY, De Smit E, Rees G, Fenwick E, Kearns LS, Mackey DA, MacGregor C, Munsie M, Cook AL, Pébay A, Hewitt AW. Participant understanding and recall of informed consent for induced pluripotent stem cell biobanking. Cell Tissue Bank 2016; 17:449-56. [PMID: 27299783 DOI: 10.1007/s10561-016-9563-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2016] [Accepted: 05/30/2016] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
The ability to generate human induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) has opened new avenues for human disease modelling and therapy. The aim of our study was to determine research participants' understanding of the information given when donating skin biopsies for the generation of patient-specific iPSCs. A customised 35-item questionnaire based on previous iPSC consent guidelines was sent to participants who had previously donated samples for iPSC research. The questionnaire asked pertinent demographic details, participants' motivation to take part in iPSC research and their attitudes towards related ethical issues. 234 participants were contacted with 141 (60.3 %) complete responses received. The median duration between recruitment and follow-up questioning was 313 days (range 10-573 days). The majority of participants (n = 129, 91.5 %) believed they understood what a stem cell was; however, only 22 (16.1 %) correctly answered questions related to basic stem cell properties. We found no statistically significant difference in responses from participants with different levels of education, or those with a health sciences background. The poor understanding amongst participants of iPSC research is unlikely to be unique to our study and may impact future research if not improved. As such, there is a need to develop an easily understood yet comprehensive consent process to ensure ongoing ethical progress of iPSC biobanking.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tristan McCaughey
- Department of Surgery, Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, University of Melbourne, 32 Gisborne Street, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Department of Surgery, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - Christine Y Chen
- Department of Surgery, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - Elisabeth De Smit
- Department of Surgery, Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, University of Melbourne, 32 Gisborne Street, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Gwyneth Rees
- Department of Surgery, Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, University of Melbourne, 32 Gisborne Street, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Eva Fenwick
- Department of Surgery, Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, University of Melbourne, 32 Gisborne Street, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore, Singapore.,Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Lisa S Kearns
- Department of Surgery, Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, University of Melbourne, 32 Gisborne Street, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - David A Mackey
- Lions Eye Institute, Centre for Ophthalmology and Visual Science, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.,Menzies Institute for Medical Research, School of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia
| | - Casimir MacGregor
- School of Social Science, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - Megan Munsie
- Stem Cells Australia, Department of Anatomy and Neuroscience, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Anthony L Cook
- Wicking Dementia Research and Education Centre, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia
| | - Alice Pébay
- Department of Surgery, Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, University of Melbourne, 32 Gisborne Street, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Alex W Hewitt
- Department of Surgery, Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, University of Melbourne, 32 Gisborne Street, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia. .,Lions Eye Institute, Centre for Ophthalmology and Visual Science, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia. .,Menzies Institute for Medical Research, School of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Petersen A, MacGregor C, Munsie M. Stem cell miracles or Russian roulette?: patients’ use of digital media to campaign for access to clinically unproven treatments. Health, Risk & Society 2015. [DOI: 10.1080/13698575.2015.1118020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
40
|
Affiliation(s)
- Megan Munsie
- The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Martin Pera
- The University of Melbourne, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, and Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Petersen A, Tanner C, Munsie M. Between hope and evidence: how community advisors demarcate the boundary between legitimate and illegitimate stem cell treatments. Health (London) 2014; 19:188-206. [PMID: 25367895 DOI: 10.1177/1363459314555240] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Stem cell science provides an exemplary study of the 'management of hope'. On the one hand, raising 'hopes' and expectations is a seen as a necessary aspect of securing investment in promising innovative research. On the other, such hyperbole risks raising hopes to a level that may lead people to undertake undue risks, which may ultimately undermine confidence in medical research. In this context, the 'management of hope' thus involves the negotiation of competing claims of truth about the value and safety of particular treatments and about the trustworthiness of providers. Using Gieryn's concept of boundary-work, this article examines the means by which this work of 'managing hope' is undertaken. Drawing on data collected as part of our study that investigated the perspectives of those who are consulted by patients and their carers about stem cell treatments, we explore how these community advisors – both scientists and clinicians with a stake in stem cell research and representatives from patient advocacy groups – demarcate the boundary between legitimate and illegitimate treatments. In particular, we examine how these actors rhetorically use 'evidence' to achieve this demarcation. We argue that analysing accounts of how advisors respond to patient enquiries about stem cell treatments offers a window for examining the workings of the politics of hope within contemporary bioscience and biomedicine. In conclusion, we emphasize the need to re-conceptualize the boundary between science and non-science so as to allow a better appreciation of the realities of health care in the age of medical travel.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alan Petersen
- Sociology, School of Social Sciences, Monash University, Australia
| | - Claire Tanner
- Sociology, School of Social Sciences, Monash University, Australia
| | - Megan Munsie
- Department of Anatomy and Neuroscience, The University of Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Abstract
The recent growth of so-called stem cell tourism reflects the high optimism that currently surrounds stem cell science. Stem cell treatments for various conditions are increasingly advertised over the Internet as being available at hospitals and clinics around the world. However, most are clinically unproven. Despite numerous warnings from scientists about the dangers posed by such treatments, many individuals are evidently prepared to take the risk, sometimes on more than one occasion. This article explores the dynamics of hope that underpin stem cell tourism. Drawing on ideas from the sociology of hope, as applied to biomedicine, the article explores how hope is constructed and shapes actions in relation to stem cell treatments. Making reference to the findings from an Australian study of patients and carers who travelled overseas to receive stem cell treatments, it is argued that hope has an ambiguous significance in the context of deregulated health care. As we explain, this has implications for patients' and carers' treatment decisions and experiences. The findings are discussed in light of current responses to stem cell tourism.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alan Petersen
- School of Political and Social Inquiry, Monash University, Australia
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Munsie M, Hyun I. A question of ethics: selling autologous stem cell therapies flaunts professional standards. Stem Cell Res 2014; 13:647-53. [PMID: 24857592 DOI: 10.1016/j.scr.2014.04.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2014] [Revised: 04/15/2014] [Accepted: 04/22/2014] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
The idea that the body's own stem cells could act as a repair kit for many conditions, including cardiac repair, underpins regenerative medicine. While progress is being made, with hundreds of clinical trials underway to evaluate possible autologous cell-based therapies, some patients and physicians are not prepared to wait and are pursuing treatments without evidence that the proposed treatments are effective, or even safe. This article explores the inherent tension between patients, practitioners and the need to regulate the development and commercialization of new cellular therapies--even when the cells come from the patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan Munsie
- Stem Cells Australia, Department of Anatomy and Neuroscience, The University of Melbourne, Parkville 3010, Australia.
| | - Insoo Hyun
- Department of Bioethics, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106-4976, USA
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Ahrlund-Richter L, De Luca M, Marshak DR, Munsie M, Veiga A, Rao M. Isolation and production of cells suitable for human therapy: challenges ahead. Cell Stem Cell 2008; 4:20-6. [PMID: 19058776 DOI: 10.1016/j.stem.2008.11.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 108] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
Considerable practical hurdles must be overcome prior to the broad application of stem cell therapies. We outline challenges that may vary across different models of cell therapy, including the following broad concepts: issues related to the sourcing of material, and issues related to product manufacturing, shipping, storage and tracking, and standardization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lars Ahrlund-Richter
- Department of Woman and Child Health, Karolinska Institutet, 171 76 Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Hyun I, Lindvall O, Ährlund-Richter L, Cattaneo E, Cavazzana-Calvo M, Cossu G, De Luca M, Fox IJ, Gerstle C, Goldstein RA, Hermerén G, High KA, Kim HO, Lee HP, Levy-Lahad E, Li L, Lo B, Marshak DR, McNab A, Munsie M, Nakauchi H, Rao M, Rooke HM, Valles CS, Srivastava A, Sugarman J, Taylor PL, Veiga A, Wong AL, Zoloth L, Daley GQ. New ISSCR Guidelines Underscore Major Principles for Responsible Translational Stem Cell Research. Cell Stem Cell 2008; 3:607-9. [DOI: 10.1016/j.stem.2008.11.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 145] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
|
46
|
Munsie M, Mountford P, Nichols J. Transgenic systems in nuclear reprogramming. Methods Mol Biol 2006; 325:115-28. [PMID: 16761723 DOI: 10.1385/1-59745-005-7:115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/10/2023]
Abstract
Transgenic reporters have proved to be invaluable in the study of nuclear reprogramming, from demonstrating revival or silencing of gene expression in fusion hybrids to providing a means to display levels and distribution of specific gene products after nuclear transfer. Here, the method of piezo-assisted direct injection, which has been used previously to generate blastocysts and subsequently embryonic stem cell lines by transfer of nuclei from transgenic reporter mice, is described. This protocol differs from previously described techniques in that the donor nucleus is placed in the recipient oocyte before removal of the host metaphase plate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan Munsie
- Stem Cell Sciences Ltd, Collingwood, Victoria, Australia
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Lang RJ, Haynes JM, Kelly J, Johnson J, Greenhalgh J, O'brien C, Mulholland EM, Baker L, Munsie M, Pouton CW. Electrical and neurotransmitter activity of mature neurons derived from mouse embryonic stem cells by Sox-1 lineage selection and directed differentiation. Eur J Neurosci 2005; 20:3209-21. [PMID: 15610154 DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2004.03782.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
Sx1TV2/16C is a mouse embryonic stem (ES) cell line in which one copy of the Sox1 gene, an early neuroectodermal marker, has been targeted with a neomycin (G418) selection cassette. A combination of directed differentiation with retinoic acid and G418 selection results in an enriched neural stem cell population that can be further differentiated into neurons. After 6-7 days post-plating (D6-7PP) most neurons readily fired tetrodotoxin (TTX)-sensitive action potentials due to the expression of TTX-sensitive Na(+) and tetraethylammonium (TEA)-sensitive K(+) channels. Neurons reached their maximal cell capacitance after D6-7PP; however, ion channel expression continued until at least D21PP. The percentage of cells receiving spontaneous synaptic currents (s.s.c.) increased with days in culture until 100% of cells received a synaptic input by D20PP. Spontaneous synaptic currents were reduced in amplitude and frequency by TTX, or upon exposure to a Ca(2+)-free, 2.5 mm Mg(2+) saline. S.s.c. of rapid decay time constants were preferentially blocked by the nonNMDA glutamatergic receptor antagonists CNQX or NBQX. Ca(2+) levels within ES cell-derived neurons increased in response to glutamate receptor agonists l-glutamate, AMPA, N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) and kainic acid and to acetylcholine, ATP and dopamine. ES cell-derived neurons also generated cationic and Cl(-)-selective currents in response to NMDA and glycine or GABA, respectively. It was concluded that ES-derived neurons fire action potentials, receive excitatory and inhibitory synaptic input and respond to various neurotransmitters in a manner akin to primary central neurons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R J Lang
- Department of Physiology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Abstract
Totipotency can be restored to the nuclei of somatic cells by reprogramming the nucleus via the technique of nuclear transfer. As genes expressed in somatic cells differ from those expressed in early embryos, a change in gene expression must accompany nuclear reprogramming. In this study, nuclear reprogramming of somatic cell nuclei following nuclear transfer (NT) was demonstrated by the reactivation of developmentally regulated lacZ reporter genes. NT embryos were generated by direct injection of adult cumulus cell nuclei into mature mouse oocytes from which maternal chromosomes were subsequently removed. Cumulus cells were collected from transgenic mice which show developmentally regulated lacZ reporter gene expression as a result of integration and functional coupling of reporter gene expression with the endogenous Oct4 or COB54 genes. As both genes are transcriptionally silent in somatic cells but are expressed during early embryonic development, reactivation of reporter gene expression in cumulus cell-derived NT embryos was assessed as a means of monitoring nuclear reprogramming. The pattern of X-gal staining observed in individual NT embryos derived from both transgenic lines revealed that coordination of reactivation appeared to be specific for each gene, and that the timing of expression was consistent with that seen in control non-manipulated transgenic embryos. However, the staining in some NT embryos appeared to be diminished or absent. This reduction in staining may indicate a failure to reprogram gene expression in these embryos. Similar transgenic strategies employing lacZ vital stains, or alter-native reporters such as GFP, may facilitate real-time monitoring of reprogramming and a potential selection strategy to increase cloning efficiency through the identification and selection of reprogrammed, preimplantation stage NT embryos prior to embryo transfer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan Munsie
- Centre for Early Human Development, Monash Institute of Reproduction and Development, Monash Universitym Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Munsie M, Peura T, Michalska A, Trounson A, Mountford P. Novel method for demonstrating nuclear contribution in mouse nuclear transfer. Reprod Fertil Dev 1999; 10:633-7. [PMID: 10612469 DOI: 10.1071/rd98098] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Confirmation of nuclear contribution is essential to all nuclear transfer experiments. Contribution is easily demonstrated in nuclear transfer progeny but more difficult to confirm in nuclear transfer embryos. The use of donor nuclei isolated from lacZ transgenic mice offers a clear and simple method to demonstrate contribution in nuclear transfer embryos and offspring. The unique line of transgenic mice (Zin40) used in this study displays nuclear localised lacZ expression in all cells, including embryonic blastomeres, and demonstrates distinctive blue nuclei when treated with X-gal substrate. This characteristic staining pattern provided an ideal marker for demonstrating nuclear contribution. Nuclear transfer embryos were generated following serial nuclear transfer of metaphase-arrested nuclei from transgenic and non-transgenic 4-cell embryos. Totipotency of nuclear transfer blastocysts was confirmed by the generation of live born offspring. Transgenic blastocysts and all tissue samples from fetuses and pups generated by nuclear transfer displayed distinctive blue nuclei when stained with X-gal. This staining pattern was characteristic of the transgenic mice from which the donor nuclei were isolated and clearly confirmed nuclear origin. The use of this marker will also allow the opportunity to investigate the developmental potential of nuclear transfer embryos by examining the contribution of nuclear transfer embryonic cells in chimaeric embryos.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Munsie
- Centre for Early Human Development, Institute of Reproduction and Development, Monash University, Vic., Australia
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Abstract
The expression of stem cell factor (SCF) mRNA and protein was examined in the postnatal rat testis. Northern blot analysis of total RNA from 1-4 days postpartum (dpp) testes showed none or barely detectable levels of the approximately 6.5 kb SCF transcript. At 5 dpp, there was a striking elevation in this mRNA, a timing that coincides with the onset of spermatogonial proliferation. Immunohistochemical staining of testes showed that SCF protein was readily detected within Sertoli cells at 1-7 dpp and in the adult. Immunoreactive material was also detected within gonocytes and within Leydig cells at 1-7 dpp and in Leydig cells in the adult. Given the intense staining of Leydig cells by two different antibodies to SCF, the potential synthesis of SCF mRNA by these cells was investigated. Northern blot and reverse transcription/polymerase chain reaction analysis indicated that adult Leydig cells do not synthesize SCF mRNA, and Sertoli cells do. The significance of these findings is discussed in the context of germ cell-Sertoli cell interactions and Leydig cell function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Munsie
- Institute of Reproduction and Development, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|