Cooled and traditional thermal radiofrequency ablation of genicular nerves in patients with chronic knee pain: a comparative outcomes analysis

Microwave ablation of synovial hypertrophy in recurrent monoarthritis: the results of extended cohort and long-term follow-up

OBJECTIVES

Recurrent monoarthritis (RM) is a major challenge of many rheumatic diseases. Ablation is a well-known technique in the treatment of benign or malign lesions of different aetiologies. We aimed to investigate the success and safety of microwave ablation (MWA) as an adjunctive therapy in a cohort of medical treatment-resistant RM.

METHODS

Patients with RM associated with different inflammatory diseases were included. MWA was performed after measuring the size of synovial hypertrophy with 15 or 20 W power and different durations until microbubbles were shown, indicating necrosis. Both clinical and radiologic data were recorded.

RESULTS

We applied MWA in total of 24 knee joints of 10 female and 12 male patients aged between 22 and 71 years. Median IA aspiration (IAA) need in the last 6 months before MWA was 5 (0-15). The median follow-up was 10 (3-16) months. Overall IAA count in the last 6 months before MWA in total of 144 months was 129, and decreased to 7 in post-MWA in total of 226 months (0.89 vs 0.03 per month, P < 0.001). The second MWA session was needed for three patients and a third session for one. Functional disability and pain scores were improved significantly (median score from 9 to 1, P < 0.00001, in both). In MRI, follow-up significant regression in synovial hypertrophy size was shown especially after the 6th month. No complication was observed during the procedure or follow-up.

CONCLUSION

As a less invasive technique compared with the surgical approach, MWA of synovial hypertrophy showed significant clinical improvement in RM safely. MWA seems promising as a treatment option candidate in the management of RM.

A critical overview of systematic reviews of radiofrequency ablation for knee osteoarthritis

PURPOSE

This overview aims to assess the methodological and evidence quality of systematic reviews related to radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for knee osteoarthritis (KOA).

METHODS

A comprehensive search strategy was conducted through two independent researchers in eight electronic databases from the inception to September 1, 2024. The methodological quality of the included systematic reviews was assessed by the Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews 2 tool. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation tool assessed the evidence quality.

RESULTS

Eight systematic reviews were finally included. The results of the methodological quality of the included systematic reviews were generally unsatisfactory. The limitations were a lack of pre-designed protocols, reasons for the inclusion of study types, a list of excluded studies, the consideration of the single study risk of bias, and management of conflicts of interest. A total of 56 outcome indicators were evaluated, with one item receiving a moderate quality rating, while the rest were classified as low or very low. Limitations were identified as the primary factors leading to the downgrade.

CONCLUSIONS

RFA shows efficacy in treating KOA, with tolerable side effects. However, systematic reviews' poor quality indicates cautious interpretation needed. Future studies must enhance quality for robust EBM.

Chemical neurolysis of genicular nerves for chronic non-cancer knee pain: a scoping review

OBJECTIVE

Chemical neurolysis of the genicular nerves is a treatment option for intractable non-cancer knee pain. This scoping review synthesizes the available literature on the effectiveness, adverse events, and procedural techniques of chemical neurolysis of genicular nerves for the management of knee pain.

DESIGN

Scoping review.

SETTING

All clinical and research settings.

SUBJECTS

Adult participants with chronic non-cancer knee pain undergoing chemical neurolysis of genicular nerves.

METHODS

A literature search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library was conducted up to September 4, 2023. Articles were searched via terms and keywords relating to "knee," "pain," "knee osteoarthritis," "ablation," "alcohol," "phenol," and "chemical neurolysis." Included articles were full-text primary studies and in English. Data were extracted by 2 independent reviewers using an electronic database.

RESULTS

Eight studies were included in this review (including 1 randomized controlled trial), comprising 192 patients. Of the 8 studies, 4 used phenol, 3 used alcohol, and 1 used either alcohol or phenol for chemical neurolysis. Fluoroscopy, ultrasound guidance, or both were used for nerve target identification. All studies demonstrated that chemical neurolysis resulted in improved pain or functional outcomes, with no serious adverse events reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Chemical neurolysis of the genicular nerves is a promising treatment strategy for chronic knee pain. Interpretation of the available studies is limited by study heterogeneity and small sample sizes. High-quality randomized controlled trials are required to clarify the selection of appropriate nerve targets and choice of image guidance and to compare with other ablative modalities.

STUDY REGISTRATION

Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/jg8wh).

Chronic post-surgical pain after total knee arthroplasty: a narrative review

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is an efficacious treatment for end-stage knee osteoarthritis, often accompanied by severe postoperative pain. In certain patients, this pain can persist for over 3 months and is referred to as chronic post-surgical pain (CPSP). Postoperative persistent pain has emerged as a significant and noteworthy issue impacting patient quality of life following TKA. The etiology of CPSP after TKA is multifaceted. Peripheral or central sensitizations resulting from inflammatory reactions, nerve injury, and neurobiological mechanisms are the primary mechanisms contributing to chronic persistent pain after TKA. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative factors can induce pain sensitization. Once CPSP occurs after TKA, it significantly hampers patient recovery with challenging treatment options. Currently, among the preventive and therapeutic strategies for chronic pain after TKA, it is widely believed that early comprehensive preventive treatment to prevent acute to chronic pain transition can substantially reduce the incidence of CPSP following TKA. In recent years, studies have investigated perioperative strategies aimed at reducing the occurrence of persistent pain after TKA. This article provides an overview of advancements in understanding the pathogenesis, high-risk factors, and preventive measures for chronic pain following TKA. We hope that this review will guide future research directions on CPSP after TKA while contributing to clinical perioperative pain management.

Innovative approaches in the treatment of chronic plantar fasciitis: comparison of pulsed radiofrequency ablation and surgical intervention

PURPOSE

This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of Pulsed Radiofrequency Ablation (PRFA) and surgery for treating chronic plantar fasciitis, focusing on pain relief and functional outcomes.

METHODS

A prospective study involved 30 patients with chronic plantar fasciitis unresponsive to 12 months of conservative treatment. Patients were divided into PRFA (n = 17) and surgical (n = 13) groups. Clinical evaluations were conducted preoperatively and at three, six and 12 months postoperatively using VAS, AOFAS, FFI, and RMS scores. Radiological measurements assessed foot structure impact.

RESULTS

Both PRFA and surgery significantly reduced pain and improved function. PRFA had a shorter operative time and quicker return to activities (p < 0.001). At 3 months, PRFA showed superior VAS, FFI, and RMS scores (p < 0.05). Long-term outcomes were similar. No major complications occurred, but minor complications were higher in the surgical group (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

PRFA is a minimally invasive, effective treatment for chronic plantar fasciitis with quicker recovery and lower complication rates compared to surgery. Both treatments offer comparable long-term benefits. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Minimally invasive interventional procedures for osteoarthritis and inflammatory arthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

to summarize the evidence on the efficacy of minimally invasive interventional procedures such as radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) in patients with osteoarthritis or inflammatory arthritis.

METHODS

a literature search was conducted in PubMed and Web of Science databases. Both randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized studies of interventions (NRSI) were included. The results were organized according to the treated anatomical site: knee, hip, foot and ankle, shoulder, hand and wrist, sacroiliac joints. Data about treatment efficacy were extracted. The main outcome was change in pain intensity using the 0-10 visual analog scale (VAS) from baseline to 1 month. Additional timepoints at 3, 6 and 12 months were assessed. Change in functional status was evaluated. Pooled estimates were calculated as the mean difference (MD) and 95 % confidence interval relative to baseline. The meta-analyses of RCTs and NRSI were conducted separately.

RESULTS

of the 4599 retrieved articles, 164 were included in the review and, considering all the established timepoints, 111 (38 RCTs and 73 NRSI) were selected for the meta-analysis. Only one article described patients with inflammatory arthritis. In the meta-analysis of RCTs, one month after the procedure, MD in VAS was -3.98 (-4.41 to -3.55; k = 21) for knee RFA, and -3.18 (-3.96 to -2.39; k = 8) for sacroiliac joints RFA. In the meta-analysis of NRSI, MD in VAS was -4.12 (-4.63 to -3.61; k = 23) for knee RFA, -3.84 (-4.77 to -2.92; k = 7) for knee TAE, -4.34 (-4.96 to -3.71; k = 2) for hip RFA, -3.83 (-4.52 to -3.15; k = 3) for shoulder RFA and -4.93 (-5.58 to -4.28; k = 14) for sacroiliac joints RFA. Significant decrease in pain intensity was found also at 3, 6 and 12 months. Additionally, functional status improved at all the assessed timepoints.

CONCLUSION

minimally invasive interventional procedures can improve pain and functional status of patients affected by OA or chronic sacroiliac pain of degenerative origin. Further research is warranted in the field of inflammatory rheumatic diseases.

Effectiveness of the Cooled Radiofrequency Ablation of Genicular Nerves in Patients with Chronic Knee Pain Due to Osteoarthritis: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Controlled Study

Background: Increasing evidence supporting the clinical effectiveness of cooled radiofrequency ablation (RFA) therapy for genicular nerves in patients with chronic knee osteoarthritis (OA) exists. However, no study has been conducted to eliminate the potential influence of a placebo effect associated with this procedure. Therefore, we evaluated the efficacy of cooled RFA compared with a sham procedure in patients with painful knees due to OA. Methods: In this double-blind, randomized, controlled study, participants were randomly assigned to receive cooled RFA of the knee (cooled RFA group, n = 20) or a sham procedure (sham group, n = 20). The primary outcome was the proportion of successful responders at the three-month follow-up. The secondary outcomes were successful responders at one and six months; pain intensity of the knee; functional status; medication; and satisfaction at one, three, and six months after the procedures. Results: For the primary outcome, the successful responder rate was significantly higher in the cooled RFA group (76.5%) than in the sham group (33.3%) (p = 0.018). For the secondary outcome, more successful responders were observed in the cooled RFA group than in the sham group at one and six months after the procedure (p = 0.041 and 0.007, respectively). The decreased knee pain intensity was maintained throughout the six-month follow-up period in the cooled RFA group. No differences were observed in functional status, medication change, or satisfaction in both groups. Conclusions: The cooled RFA of genicular nerves offers significant pain relief and surpasses the effects attributable to a placebo.

Effectiveness comparison of genicular nerve ablation for knee osteoarthritic versus post-total knee arthroplasty pain

Background

Genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation (GNRFA) is a popular and effective procedure to treat arthritic knee pain. For refractory arthritic pain that fails conservative treatment, total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been an excellent option. Unfortunately, 15-30% of people who undergo a TKA continue to experience pain and stiffness in the knee. The treatment options for post-TKA knee pain are limited. Pain providers have been trialing GNRFA on this pain condition. However, convincing evidence of its efficacy in treating post-TKA pain is still lacking.

Methods

This is a retrospective study of 73 patients who had undergone genicular nerve RFA, 46 (63.01%) with osteoarthritic pain, and 27 (36.99%) with post-TKA pain. We compared the outcomes (pain relief, function, and complications) between these two groups at 3 months and 6 months after RFA.

Results

Before RFA, there was no significant difference in initial pain and functional level between these two groups. After RFA, the two groups had comparable pain relief at 3 months (p = 0.68) and 6 months (p = 0.53), and similar functionality at 3 months (p = 0.36) and 6 months (p = 0.65).The overall success rate (≥50% pain relief after RFA) was 80.82%, 95% CI: 70.34%-88.22% (osteoarthritic group 80.43%, 95% CI: 66.83%-89.35%, post-TKA 81.48%, 95% CI: 63.30%-91.82%, P = 0.91) at 3-month follow-up and 56.16%, 95% CI: 44.76%-66.95% (osteoarthritic group 56.52%, 95% CI: 42.25%-69.79%, post-TKA 55.56%, 95% CI: 37.31%-72.41%, P = 0.94) at 6-month follow-up.There were no reported complications in either group.

Conclusions

Genicular Nerve Radiofrequency Ablation (GNRFA) holds the potential to be equally effective for both post-TKA knee pain and osteoarthritic knee pain.

Cooled radiofrequency ablation of genicular nerves for knee osteoarthritis

Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a prevalent and debilitating musculoskeletal condition that significantly affects the quality of life of millions of individuals worldwide. In recent years, cooled radiofrequency ablation (CRFA) has become a viable treatment option for knee OA. This review thoroughly evaluated the existing literature on CRFA therapy for knee OA. It delved into the mechanisms behind CRFA, evaluated its clinical efficacy, and investigated potential avenues for future research and application. The insights gained from this review are crucial for healthcare professionals, researchers, and policymakers, offering an updated perspective on CRFA's role as a viable therapeutic option for knee OA.

Diagnosis and Treatment of Post-Radiofrequency Synovial Knee Fistula: Case Report

Recently, denervation therapies have drawn attention as a promising treatment, and cooled radiofrequency has been proposed as the best option to capture most of the genicular nerves. We present a rare case of synovial knee fistula after radiofrequency and its management. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case reported in the literature. The treatment included immobilization and chemoprophylaxis. One week later, the fistula was closed, and 14 months later, the procedure was repeated without complications. Genicular radiofrequency ablation is an emerging technique, and providers should be aware of the reported complications to counsel patients and manage potential risks appropriately.

Is Radiofrequency Ablation Superior to Intra-Articular Injections for the Treatment of Symptomatic Knee Osteoarthritis?-A Systematic Review

The radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is considered a valid, minimally invasive treatment modality for the management of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (OA). The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of RFA with that of commonly used intra-articular injections for the persistent knee pain due to OA. Medline/Pubmed and Scopus databases were systematically searched up to April 2023 to identify studies comparing the effect of RFA and intra-articular injections (IAIs) on knee OA. Nine studies including 899 patients fulfilled the eligibility criteria and were included in the systematic review. The RFA procedure was related with improved knee pain relief compared to IAIs at 3-, 6- and 12-month follow-up (p < 0.001). Similarly, functional improvement was greater in RFA treatment than that observed after hyaluronic acid (HA), steroid or platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections (Visual Analogue Scale p < 0.001, Numeric Rating Scale p = 0.019, Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index p = 0.012). The overall procedural complication rate of RFA was 10.2% and was higher than steroid (p = 0.023) and PRP (p = 0.017) injections. However, no severe adverse events were reported. For patients with symptomatic knee OA, RFA seems to be more effective than IAIs in alleviating pain and improving joint function, despite the relatively higher incidence of non-serious adverse events. However, due to the limited number of studies and patients, this result should be interpreted with caution and not be generalized to the entire knee OA population.

Upper limb and lower limb radiofrequency treatments in orthopaedics

Radiofrequency (RF) is a minimally invasive technique for disrupting or altering nociceptive pathways to treat musculoskeletal neuropathic and nociplastic pain. RF has been employed to treat painful shoulder, lateral epicondylitis, knee and hip osteoarthritis, chronic knee pain, Perthes disease, greater trochanteric pain syndrome, plantar fasciitis, and painful stump neuromas; it has also been employed before and after painful total knee arthroplasty and after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. The benefits of RF include the following:it is safer than surgery; there is no need for general anaesthesia, thereby reducing adverse effects; it alleviates pain for a minimum of 3-4 months; it can be repeatable if necessary; and it improves joint function and minimizes the need for oral pain medication. RF is contraindicated for pregnant women; unstable joints (hip, knee, and shoulder); uncontrolled diabetes mellitus; presence of an implanted defibrillator; and chronic joint infection (hip, knee, and shoulder). Although adverse events from RF are unusual, potential complications can include infection, bleeding, numbness or dysesthesia, increased pain at the procedural site, deafferentation effect, and Charcot joint neuropathy. Although there is a risk of damaging non-targeted neural tissue and other structures, this can be mitigated by performing the technique under imaging guidance (fluoroscopy, ultrasonography, and computed tomography). RF appears to be a valuable technique for alleviating chronic pain syndromes; however, firm proof of the technique's efficacy is still required. RF is a promising technique for managing chronic musculoskeletal of the limbs pain, particularly when other techniques are futile or not possible.