Eligibility criteria for biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in axial spondyloarthritis: going beyond BASDAI

Association of trabecular bone score with disease parameters and vertebral fractures in axial spondyloarthritis

Objectives

We aimed to study trabecular bone score (TBS) association with disease parameters and vertebral fractures (VFs) in patients with axial spondyloarthritis.

Methods

Patients diagnosed with axial spondyloarthritis were included in this cross-sectional study. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry was used to measure BMD in the lumbar spine and TBS. Low TBS was defined as ≤1.31. The association between TBS and disease parameters including Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS), BASDAI, BASFI and BASMI was studied using logistic regressions.

Results

Our study included 56 patients, with a mean age of 38.9 ± 13.5 years and a mean disease duration of 12.7 ± 7.7 years. Patients with low TBS were significantly older and had higher waist circumference and body mass index. These patients also showed greater clinical activity, as evidenced by higher ASDAS-CRP, BASFI and BASMI scores (P < 0.05). In multivariate logistic regression, low TBS was associated with all disease parameters, except for BASMI: BASDAI (OR [95% CI] = 3.68 [1.48-9.19], P = 0.005), ASDAS-CRP (OR [95% CI] = 2.92 [1.20-7.10], P = 0.018), BASFI (OR [95% CI] = 1.04 [1.01-1.08], P = 0.018), BASMI (OR [95% CI] = 1.36 [0.99-1.87], P = 0.062). However, no association was observed between TBS and VFs.

Conclusion

TBS was associated with active spondyloarthritis, suggesting increased bone fragility in these patients. However, TBS failed to demonstrate an association with VFs.

Construct validity of Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) and Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) treatment target cut-offs in a BASDAI treat-to-target axial spondyloarthritis cohort: a cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVE

In axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) and Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) are recommended for use in treat-to-target (T2T) strategies. However, BASDAI disease states may be a less suitable T2T instrument than ASDAS, since BASDAI contains non-disease activity related items. The objective of our study was to investigate the construct validity of BASDAI and ASDAS disease states.

METHOD

We performed a single-centre cross-sectional study on BASDAI and ASDAS construct validity in long-term BASDAI T2T-treated axSpA patients. Our hypothesis was that BASDAI is less representative of disease activity than ASDAS owing to the focus on pain and fatigue, and missing an objective item, e.g. C-reactive protein (CRP). This was operationalized using several subhypotheses.

RESULTS

The study included 242 axSpA patients. BASDAI and ASDAS disease states showed a similar relation to Patient Acceptable Symptom State and T2T protocol adherence. The proportions of patients with high BASDAI and ASDAS disease activity fulfilling Central Sensitization Inventory and fibromyalgia syndrome criteria were similar. The correlation with fatigue was moderate for both BASDAI (Spearman's rho 0.64) and ASDAS (Spearman's rho 0.54) disease states. A high ASDAS was strongly correlated with increased CRP (relative risk 6.02, 95% CI 3.0-12.09), while this correlation was not seen for BASDAI (relative risk 1.13, 95% CI 0.74-1.74).

CONCLUSION

Our study showed moderate and comparable construct validity for BASDAI- and ASDAS-based disease activity states, with the expected exception of association with CRP. Therefore, no strong preference can be given for either measure, although the ASDAS seems marginally more valid.

Comparison of Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score and Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index tools in assessment of axial spondyloarthritis activity

Axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is an inflammatory joint disease, in which the dominant symptom is inflammatory back pain. It affects approximately 1% of the population, with a higher incidence in males. Spinal pain associated with spondyloarthritis is referred to as inflammatory back pain. In clinical practice, it is extremely important to be able to assess the activity of inflammatory back diseases and to select appropriate treatment and monitor the therapy. Currently, two main tools are used for assessment of the activity of axial spondyloarthritis: BASDAI (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index) and ASDAS (Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score). The BASDAI is a tool used for years for assessment of disease activity, determining eligibility for treatment, and making decisions about continuation of therapy. Since BASDAI depends entirely on patient self-assessment, it is considered less objective than the ASDAS index. In turn, the latter includes not only answers to questions provided by the patient but also a parameter of inflammation such as erythrocyte sedimentation rate or C-reactive protein (CRP). Additionally, increasing numbers of studies report advantages of the ASDAS index over BASDAI. Moreover, as indicated by ASAS/EULAR (Assessment in Spondyloarthritis International Society/European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology) 2022, ASDAS, especially ASDAS-CRP is the preferred tool for assessment of the activity of axSpA, whereas BASDAI is used only when the evaluation of the ASDAS is not possible. This paper presents the definition and symptoms of axSpA and reviews the latest research on ASDAS and BASDAI, with emphasis on the objectivity of the ASDAS assessment also presenting the doubts and limitations concerning this tool.

The effect of uveitis and undiagnosed spondyloarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Delay diagnosis of spondyloarthritis (SpA) is associated with poor functional ability and quality of life. Uveitis is the most frequent extraarticular manifestation in SpA, and its prevalence increases with longer disease duration. This study examines the effect of uveitis on the disease activity and functional outcome of undiagnosed SpA. We reviewed published and unpublished studies. Data were pooled using the random-effects model; pooled means, and mean differences (MDs) were calculated. In the included 14 studies, disease activity, functional index, and inflammatory markers were measured in 2581 patients with SpA with uveitis and 13,972 without. The pooled mean delay in diagnosis of SpA with uveitis (6.08 years; 95% CI 4.77 to 7.38) was longer than those without (5.41 years; 95% CI 3.94 to 6.89). The Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) score was the highest for a delay of 2-5 years (5.60, 95% CI 5.47 to 5.73) and the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) score was the lowest for a delay of < 2 years (2.92, 95% CI 2.48 to 3.37) and gradually increased to delay of > 10 years (4.17, 95% CI 2.93 to 5.41). Patients with SpA with uveitis had higher trend of Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS)-CRP and BASDAI. The delay to diagnosis was longer in SpA with uveitis, and disease activity was often higher than those without uveitis. Early diagnosis of SpA with timely initiation of an appropriate management plan may reduce the adverse effects of the disease and improve functional ability.

Worse scores but similar patterns of disease activity: interpreting outcomes in women with axial spondyloarthropathy

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of sex on disease activity in axial spondylitis (axSpA).

METHOD

Data were extracted from the Ankylosing Spondylitis Registry of Ireland (ASRI). In this cross-sectional study, patients were analysed on the basis of sex, with a series of comparison analyses performed.

RESULTS

Overall, 886 participants were enrolled in the ASRI [232 (26.2%) women, 644 (72.6%) men]. Females recorded significantly worse Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) (4.57 vs 3.83, p < 0.01) and Ankylosing Spondylitis Quality of Life questionnaire (ASQoL) (7.51 vs 6.12, p < 0.01) scores than males. There was a stronger correlation in the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional and Metrology Indices (BASFI and BASMI) in females (r_s = 0.619, p < 0.01) than in males (r_s = 0.572, p < 0.01). Analysis of factors in BASDAI revealed that the higher total scores in females compared to males were due not to any single component, but to worse scores in all six components of the BASDAI combined. Ranking of components by severity between sexes revealed identical ranking in four of the six components of the BASDAI.

CONCLUSIONS

Women with axSpA reported significantly worse disease activity, quality of life, and functional ability than men. However, the BASDAI capturedsimilar patterns of disease activity. Limitation of spinal mobility in women with axSpA corresponded to greater impairment in functional ability. Further evaluation of disease monitoring tools is required to ensure that disease activity is accurately captured in men and women with axSpA.

ASAS-EULAR recommendations for the management of axial spondyloarthritis: 2022 update

OBJECTIVES

To update the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS)-EULAR recommendations for the management of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA).

METHODS

Following the EULAR Standardised Operating Procedures, two systematic literature reviews were conducted on non-pharmacological and pharmacological treatment of axSpA. In a task force meeting, the evidence was presented, discussed, and overarching principles and recommendations were updated, followed by voting.

RESULTS

Five overarching principles and 15 recommendations with a focus on personalised medicine were agreed: eight remained unchanged from the previous recommendations; three with minor edits on nomenclature; two with relevant updates (#9, 12); two newly formulated (#10, 11). The first five recommendations focus on treatment target and monitoring, non-pharmacological management and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) as first-choice pharmacological treatment. Recommendations 6-8 deal with analgesics and discourage long-term glucocorticoids and conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) for pure axial involvement. Recommendation 9 describes the indication of biological DMARDs (bDMARDs, that is, tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi), interleukin-17 inhibitors (IL-17i)) and targeted synthetic DMARDs (tsDMARDs, ie, Janus kinase inhibitors) for patients who have Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score ≥2.1 and failed ≥2 NSAIDs and also have either elevated C reactive protein, MRI inflammation of sacroiliac joints or radiographic sacroiliitis. Current practice is to start a TNFi or IL-17i. Recommendation 10 addresses extramusculoskeletal manifestations with TNF monoclonal antibodies preferred for recurrent uveitis or inflammatory bowel disease, and IL-17i for significant psoriasis. Treatment failure should prompt re-evaluation of the diagnosis and consideration of the presence of comorbidities (#11). If active axSpA is confirmed, switching to another b/tsDMARD is recommended (#12). Tapering, rather than immediate discontinuation of a bDMARD, can be considered in patients in sustained remission (#13). The last recommendations (#14, 15) deal with surgery and spinal fractures.

CONCLUSIONS

The 2022 ASAS-EULAR recommendations provide up-to-date guidance on the management of patients with axSpA.

Immunogenicity and safety of the booster BNT162b2 vaccine in patients with axial spondyloarthritis treated with biological disease-modifying drugs

Background

Vaccination confers relatively short-term protection against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), indicating the need for booster doses. Immunocompromised individuals, including those with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs), may have pronounced immune response waning. Vaccine-boosted humoral and T-cell responses minimize poor coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) outcome without increasing adverse events (AE). There is limited evidence of third-dose vaccination in axial spondyloarthritis (AxSpA) patients. We investigated immune-response persistence after primary vaccination and immunogenicity and safety after the BNT162b2 booster vaccination.

Methods

This prospective observational study enrolled an AxSpA cohort treated with interleukin-17 (IL-17) and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNFα) inhibitors. Serum SARS-CoV-2-specific and virus-neutralizing antibodies for humoral response and flow cytometric detection of intracellular cytokines following SARS-CoV-2-specific peptide-based stimulation for T-cell immune responses were assessed, and safety was evaluated via a clinical questionnaire.

Results

Fifteen male AxSpA patients treated with TNFα (73·3%) or IL-17 (26·7%) inhibitors were enrolled and had humoral response persistence at 6 months: 905·6 ( ± 186·1 SD) and 409·1 ( ± 335·7) U/mL. Specific antibody concentrations further increased after booster vaccination to 989·7 ( ± 12·62) and 1000 U/mL and T-cell responders from 53·3% to 80%, with no differences between AxSpA (including “vaccination only” and “hybrid immunity” subgroups) and healthy control (HC) cohorts. No severe AE occurred; the AE spectrum was comparable to that of the general population.

Conclusion

Immune-response persistence after primary vaccination and immunogenicity after booster vaccination were unaffected by anti-IL17 or anti-TNFα therapy with similar AE as in the general population.

The BASDAI Cut-Off for Disease Activity Corresponding to the ASDAS Scores in a Taiwanese Cohort of Ankylosing Spondylitis

Objectives

The Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) has been widely utilized to evaluate disease activity in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) by an arbitrary cut-off of ≥4 to indicate high disease activity and initiate biological therapy. The Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) is a new composite index to assess AS disease activity states that have been defined and validated. ASDAS ≥2.1 was selected as a criterion to start biological therapy. The purpose of this study was to estimate the corresponding BASDAI and ASDAS cut-off in a Taiwanese AS cohort.

Methods

From November 2016 to October 2018, we assessed the ASDAS and the BASDAI regularly and recorded demographic data for 489 AS patients in Taichung Veterans General hospital (TCVGH) using an electronic patient-reported data system linked to electronic medical records. We used receiver operating characteristic curves with Youden's J statistic to determine the BASDAI values that correspond to ASDAS disease activity cut-offs (i.e., 1.3, 2.1, and 3.5).

Results

In our population, the best trade-off BASDAI values corresponding to ASDAS -C-reactive protein (CRP) 1.3, 2.1, and 3.5 were 2.1, 3.1, and 3.7, respectively. The optimal BASDAI values corresponding to ASDAS-erythrocyte sedimentation rates 1.3, 2.1, and 3.5 were 2.0, 2.6, and 4.8, respectively.

Conclusion

We propose a revised BASDAI cut-off based on our data, as BASDAI scores are commonly used globally. A more reasonable, lower BASDAI cut-off to initiate or change biological therapy will bring us closer to better decisions to treat AS patients.

Achievement rate and predictive factors of the recommended therapeutical target in patients with axial spondyloarthritis who remain on biological therapy: a prospective cohort study in Spain

OBJECTIVES

To determine the frequency of sustained remission (R) or low diseas activity (LDA) in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) undergoing long-term biological therapy and to analyse predictive factors for achieving these outcomes.

DESIGN

Prospective, observational cohort study.

SETTING

Spanish hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients with axSpA who initiated biological treatment between 2003 and 2017.

INTERVENTION

Assessment of demographic and clinical characteristics at the beginning of treatment and disease activity every 6 months up to a maximum of 2 years.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Disease activity was measured by Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) and Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index and C reactive protein (BASDAI&CRP). Sustained R was defined as ASDAS<1.3 and/or BASDAI <2 and normal CRP while sustained LDA was defined as ASDAS <2.1 and/or BASDAI <4 and normal CRP on at least three consecutive visits.

RESULTS

In total 186 patients (66.1% men and 75.3% with radiographic sacroiliitis) were included. Overall, 76.8% of patients achieved ASDAS R/LDA (R53.2%/LDA23.6%) in at least one visit. Forty per cent (R17.6%/LDA22.4%) of the patients fulfilled the sustained ASDAS R/LDA state, whereas only 30.8% maintained this status (R14.8%/LDA15.9%) according to BASDAI&CRP. In the multivariate analysis, male sex (OR=4.01), younger age at the beginning of biological therapy (OR=0.96) and an HLA*B27 positive status (OR=4.30) were associated with achieving sustained ASDAS R/LDA.

CONCLUSIONS

In clinical practice, around one-third of patients on biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs achieve a sustained R/LDA status, but these rates drop to less than one in five when targeting remission, preventing the use of the latter as a feasible target. Male sex, HLA*B27 positivity and younger age at the beginning of biological therapy are the main predictors for achieving sustained R/LDA.

The Association Between TNF Inhibitor Therapy Availability and Hospital Admission Rates for Patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis. A Longitudinal Population-Based Study

BACKGROUND

TNF inhibiting drugs (TNFi) provide symptomatic relief for patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS), but uncertainty remains about long-term benefits. We compared hospital admissions, emergency department (ED) presentations, and direct health care costs before and after the availability of subsidized TNFi therapy for AS patients.

METHODS

State-specific dispensing and cost data for TNFi therapy for AS in Western Australia (WA) were obtained from Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) and expressed as the number of defined daily doses (DDD)/1000 population/day. Linked admission and ED data for 1783 AS patients followed for 14,257 person-years between 1990 and 2015 were extracted. Pre- and post-2005 admission rates/100,000 population were compared by rate ratio (RR).

RESULTS

TNFi uptake in WA reached a DDD/1000 population/day 0.45 at an annual cost of AU$17.7 million in 2020. Hospital admission rates remained unchanged (RR: 0.95, CI 0.71-1.27, p = 0.66) but increased slightly in female patients (RR 1.22; CI 0.91-1.64, p = 0.20). While there was no change in cardiovascular admissions (6.3 vs. 6.2%, p = 0.6) or ED visit rates since 2005, frequency for cancer (2.7 vs. 3.8%, p < 0.01), infection (1.1 vs. 1.7%, p < 0.01) and mental health (4.0 vs. 4.5%, p < 0.02) admissions increased. Associated direct health care costs (2020 values) averaged AU$14.7 million before and AU$ 24.7 million per year after 2005.

CONCLUSIONS

The introduction of subsidized TNFi therapy did not change all-cause hospital admission or ED visit rates for existing AS patients. Whether the significantly increased direct health care costs are offset by reductions in other health care costs remains to be determined.

BASDAI cut-off values corresponding to ASDAS cut-off values

OBJECTIVE

To determine cut-off values of Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) that can discriminate the four disease activity states (inactive disease, moderate disease activity, high disease activity, and very high disease activity), separated by the validated Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) cut-off values (1.3, 2.1, and 3.5).

METHODS

We included 333 patients with axial spondyloarthritis whose data on BASDAI and ASDAS-C reactive protein (ASDAS-CRP) were available. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis was performed to determine the BASDAI cut-off values that best corresponded to ASDAS-CRP cut-off values. The degree of agreement between disease activity states based on the BASDAI and ASDAS-CRP cut-off values was assessed using weighted kappa.

RESULTS

Of the total 333 patients, 52 (15.6%), 190 (57.1%), 76 (22.8%), and 15 (4.5%) patients had inactive disease, moderate disease activity, high disease activity, and very high disease activity, respectively, according to the ASDAS-CRP. ROC analyses revealed that the BASDAI values 1.9 (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.948 [0.922-0.974]), 3.5 (AUC: 0.926 [0.887-0.966]), and 4.9 (AUC: 0.917 [0.837-0.996]) best corresponded to the ASDAS-CRP values 1.3, 2.1, and 3.5, respectively. The degree of agreement between disease activity states based on the BASDAI and ASDAS-CRP cut-off values was good (weighted kappa: 0.724, p< 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The BASDAI values 1.9, 3.5, and 4.9 corresponded to the ASDAS-CRP values 1.3, 2.1, and 3.5, respectively. These cut-off values could be useful in clinical studies and real-world practice for determining disease activity status when ASDAS-CRP is unavailable.

Low BASDAI score alone is not a good predictor of anti-tumor necrosis factor treatment efficacy in ankylosing spondylitis: a retrospective cohort study

Background

The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of high disease activity as measured using the Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients who nonetheless have low Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) scores after anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) treatment. Its clinical impact on anti-TNF survival was also investigated.

Methods

We conducted a single-centre retrospective cohort study of AS patients having low BASDAI scores (< 4) and available ASDAS-C-reactive protein (CRP) data after 3 months of first-line anti-TNF treatment. Patients were grouped into high-ASDAS (≥ 2.1) and low-ASDAS (< 2.1) groups according to the ASDAS-CRP after 3 months of anti-TNF treatment. Their characteristics were compared. And survival analyses were carried out using Kaplan–Meier curves and log-rank test with the event being discontinuation of anti-TNF treatment due to lack/loss of efficacy.

Results

Among 116 AS patients with low BASDAI scores after 3 months of anti-TNF treatment, 38.8% were grouped into the high-ASDAS group. The high-ASDAS group tended to have greater disease activity after 9 months of treatment (BASDAI 2.9 ± 1.1 vs. 2.3 ± 1.4, p=0.007; ASDAS-CRP 1.8 ± 0.6 vs. 1.5 ± 0.7, p=0.079; proportion of high ASDAS-CRP 27.8% vs. 13.8%, p=0.094) and greater risk of discontinuing anti-TNF treatment due to lack/loss of efficacy than the low-ASDAS group (p=0.011).

Conclusions

A relatively high proportion of AS patients with low BASDAI scores had high ASDAS-CRP. These low-BASDAI/high-ASDAS-CRP patients also had a greater risk for discontinuation of anti-TNF treatment due to low/lack of efficacy than the low-ASDAS group. The use of the ASDAS-CRP alone or in addition to the BASDAI may improve the assessment of AS patients treated with anti-TNF agents.