Introduction and switching of biologic agents are associated with antidepressant and anxiolytic medication use: data on 42 815 real-world patients with inflammatory rheumatic disease

Incidence and risk factors of mental illnesses among patients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases: an 18-year population-based study

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the incidence and risk factors surrounding mental illnesses in patients diagnosed with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs).

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study used nationwide, population-based claim data taken from Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD) to identify patients certified as having a catastrophic illness for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), systemic sclerosis (SSc), dermatomyositis (DM), polymyositis (PM) or Sjögren's syndrome (SS) from the years 2002-2020. We furthermore calculated the incidence of mental illness in patients diagnosed with SARDs while exploring factors associated with the development of mental illness using multivariable Cox regression analysis shown as adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

Among the 28 588 participants, the average age was 47.4 (SD 14.9) years, with most participants being female (76.4%). When compared with patients with rheumatoid arthritis, patients with SLE (HR: 1.20, 95% CI: 1.10-1.32), SS (HR: 1.29, 95% CI: 1.19-1.39), and DM (HR: 1.28, 95% CI: 1.04-1.32) showed a significantly increased risk of developing mental illness. Additionally, when compared with patients with rheumatoid arthritis, patients with SLE (HR: 1.32, 95% CI: 1.21-1.44), SSc (HR: 1.20, 95% CI: 1.02-1.41), SS (HR: 1.17, 95% CI: 1.08-1.26), DM (HR: 1.73, 95% CI: 1.44-2.07), and PM (HR: 1.64, 95% CI: 1.32-2.03) showed a significantly increased risk of antidepressant use.

CONCLUSION

This population-based cohort study revealed that patients diagnosed with SLE, SS, and DM had significantly higher risks of developing mental illness when compared with patients with RA.

Determinants of perceived patient benefit in a longitudinal cohort study of patients with psoriasis and atopic dermatitis

The Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) should be used to assess treatment success in psoriasis (PSO). However, the DLQI does not assess the importance and achievement of treatment goals. The Patient Benefit Index (PBI) is a questionnaire that takes both into account. Currently, there is insufficient knowledge about the modulating variables of the PBI and whether it can complement the assessment of the DLQI. In a longitudinal cohort study, 82 patients with PSO were assessed before and up to sixteen weeks after a new treatment episode. The PBI was compared with patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) (n = 61). The effects of gender, age, type of therapy, improvement in body surface area (BSA), anxiety/depression, DLQI and individual coping were assessed. "Getting better skin quickly" was most important in PSO. Improved BSA, anxiety/depression, DLQI, male gender and initiation of biological therapy had the most positive effects. Partial mediation was found for the reduction of anxiety/depression and improved coping. The PBI may be considered an appropriate outcome measure of treatment success in PSO, complementing the DLQI. Patients with clinically relevant anxiety/depression and inadequate coping should be offered adjuvant psychosomatic treatment.

Quality of Life, Depression, and Psychological Distress Among Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis Treated With Biologics

The introduction of biologics has improved the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), enhancing disease control and quality of life for patients. However, despite these advancements, some individuals still experience distress and depression due to the effects of treatment and concerns about the outcomes of biologic therapy. This study aimed to evaluate the current quality of life, level of distress, and depression among RA patients treated with biologics, which could serve as a basis for intervention. The Quality of Life in Rheumatoid Arthritis Instrument II (QoL-RAII), Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (KPDS), and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) were used to gather the necessary data. These standardized questionnaires were randomly administered to 100 RA patients undergoing biologic treatment. The data were then tabulated and analyzed using the mean and Pearson r correlation. The study's results revealed a low average quality of life and a very high level of psychological distress among the respondents. Additionally, there was an extreme level of depression observed in RA patients. Furthermore, a significant correlation was found between quality of life and the level of psychological distress among the patients. The findings concluded that RA patients have poor quality of life, experience very high levels of psychological distress, and suffer from extreme depression. The study underscored the urgent need for mental health professionals to provide immediate intervention.

Can we predict the risk factors for switching due to ineffectiveness in the first year of therapy with bDMARD in patients with rheumatoid arthritis?

INTRODUCTION

Biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARD) have improved the clinical course and quality of life of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, some patients failed to respond or have an insufficient response to bDMARD early in the course of the treatment.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the percentage of RA patients who need to switch due to ineffectiveness in the first year of treatment and to identify specific baseline features as possible predictors of switch due to ineffectiveness in the first year of treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An observational retrospective study was conducted with patients with RA that started their first bDMARD. Demographic data, disease characteristics, disease activity data scores, laboratory parameters and treatment at baseline were collected. The proportion of patients who failed to respond and who switched to another bDMARD in the first year of treatment was calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 437 (364 females, 83.3%) patients with RA were included. The majority of these patients started an anti-TNF-α agent (n=315, 72.1%). Forty-eight (11.0%) patients failed to respond to the bDMARD in the first year of treatment. There were significantly more current or former smokers (p=0.030), with a history of depression (p=0.003) and positive for RF at baseline (p=0.014) in the switch group. In the multivariate analysis, anti-TNF-α agents use (OR 8.3, 95% CI 2.4-28.8, p=0.001), tobacco exposure (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.1-4.8, p=0.02) and history of depression (OR 3.1, 95% CI 1.3-7.7) seem to predict the need to switch in the first year of treatment due to ineffectiveness.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

In our study, tobacco exposure and depression appear to be modifiable risk factors associated with early switching due to ineffectiveness. Addressing these factors in daily clinical practice is crucial to enhance the overall response to therapy and improve the well-being of patients.

What is the association of depression with clinical response to therapy in patients with psoriatic arthritis treated with biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs?

INTRODUCTION

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic, progressive inflammatory joint disease that is associated with higher prevalence of depression. There is limited literature about the impact of depression, particularly regarding the response to therapy.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study with PsA patients that started their first biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARD) was conducted. In the majority of cases, a cutoff score of ≥ 8 in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) was used to define cases of depression. In cases where patients did not complete the questionnaire, a previous diagnosis made by a psychiatrist was used to establish the presence of depression. Response to therapy 12 months after the start of bDMARD was evaluated and the switch rate to another bDMARD due to inefficacy was assessed at month 12.

RESULTS

A total of 129 patients (66 females, 51.2%; mean age of 47.7 ± 11.0 years and mean disease duration of 10.0 ± 7.7 years) with PsA were included. Thirty-two (24.8%) patients had depression. Patients with depression and peripheral involvement had a significantly lower ACR20/50/70 responses (p = 0.001, p = 0.002, and p = 0.001 respectively) after 12 months of therapy and a significantly worse EULAR response (p = 0.002). Furthermore, patients with depression and axial involvement had a significantly worse response based on ASDAS response criteria (p = 0.031). Switch due to ineffectiveness in the first 12 months was significantly higher in patients with depression (p = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

Depression in PsA is a frequent yet often understudied comorbidity. The causal relationship between depression and PsA is difficult to decrypt and further research is needed. Recognition of depressive symptoms is crucial and a multidisciplinary approach should be provided to individuals with this comorbidity. Key Points • Depression in PsA is a frequent yet often understudied comorbidity. In our study, the prevalence of depression was 24.8%. • Depression in PsA seems to be associated to lower response to therapy and higher discontinuation rates of bDMARD. • Recognition of depressive symptoms is crucial and a multidisciplinary approach should be provided to individuals with this comorbidity.

Cost Effectiveness of Tofacitinib for the Treatment of Active Ankylosing Spondylitis in Greece

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Ankylosing spondylitis is a chronic, progressive, inflammatory, multidimensional, musculoskeletal disease primarily involving the axial skeleton. In addition, ankylosing spondylitis is associated with increased morbidity and mortality, significantly affecting productivity and overall quality of life. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the cost effectiveness of tofacitinib compared to currently marketed biologic treatment in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis who have responded inadequately to conventional therapy (biologic-naïve population) or previous biologic therapy (biologic-experienced population) in Greece.

METHODS

A published model comprising a decision tree and a three-state Markov model was adapted from a public payer perspective over a lifetime horizon. Adalimumab and secukinumab, having the highest market shares among biologics for the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis in Greece (standard practice), were selected as comparators in the analysis. Clinical parameters captured treatment response defined per Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society 20 response, short-term and long-term changes in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index and Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index scores, long-term biologic treatment discontinuation, and adverse events. Efficacy, safety data, and utility values were elicited from the published literature. Direct costs pertaining to drug acquisition, monitoring, adverse events, and disease management costs were considered in the analysis (€2022). Model outcomes were patients' quality-adjusted life-years, total costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. All future outcomes were discounted at 3.5% per annum. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis was conducted to account for model uncertainty.

RESULTS

In a biologic-naïve population, compared with adalimumab, tofacitinib produced an estimated 0.06 additional quality-adjusted life-years [QALYs] (10.67 vs 10.73), at additional costs of €2403 (€147,096 vs €149,500) resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of €41,378 per QALY gained. In a biologic-experienced population, the total cost per patient for tofacitinib and secukinumab was estimated to be €151,371 and €145,757, respectively. In terms of health outcomes, tofacitinib was associated with a 0.13 increment in QALYs compared with secukinumab resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of €42,784 per QALY gained. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis confirmed the deterministic results for both populations.

CONCLUSIONS

Tofacitinib was estimated to be a cost-effective option for the treatment of active ankylosing spondylitis in Greece for both biologic-naive and biologic-experienced patients.

Depression symptoms increase the risk for initiation or switching to biologic therapy in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease patients in remission

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Anxiety and depression symptoms are common in IBD population, both adult and pediatric patients. Increased psychological distress might contribute to initiation and switching to biologic therapy in adult patients with IBD or other chronic inflammatory diseases. Aim of the present study are to evaluate anxiety and depression symptoms in IBD pediatric patients with disease remission and investigate their role in initiation or switching to biologic therapy.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis on IBD pediatric patients, assessing for anxiety (GAD-7) and depression (PHQ-9) symptoms. Demographic and disease characteristics were obtained from medical records.

RESULTS

Eighty-six patients [31 (36%) females - mean age = 15.6 (SD = 2.8) years] were included. Patients scored above cut-off (> 10) on PHQ-9 and GAD-7 were 17 (19.7%) and 18 (20.9%), respectively. No differences were found between UC and CD patients. Baseline clinically relevant depression symptoms were significantly associated with the odds of initiating or switching to biologic therapy within 2 years [OR = 4.5 (1.4-14.3)], even after confounders adjustment [4.2 (1.2-14.9)]. Relationship was not significant with anxiety symptoms.

CONCLUSION

Anxiety and depression symptoms is relatively common in pediatric IBD population, even with disease remission. Pediatric IBD patients with high depression symptoms are at increased risk of initiating or switching to biologic therapy. Mental health screening programs should be incorporated in routine clinical practice, especially for depression, regardless of disease activity and disease type. Early diagnosis and proper intervention for mental illness should be part of routine IBD management.

Different COVID-19 outcomes among systemic rheumatic diseases: a nation-wide cohort study

OBJECTIVES

To investigate coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-associated risk of hospitalization and death in RA, AS, PsA, SLE and SSc in comparison with the general population during the first year of the pandemic, and compare their overall mortality with 2019.

METHODS

Interlinking nationwide electronic registries, we recorded confirmed COVID-19-associated infections, hospitalizations and deaths, and all-cause deaths between 1 March 2020 and 28 February 2021 in all adults with RA, AS, PsA, SLE and SSc under treatment (n = 74 970, median age 67.5, 51.2, 58.1, 56.2 and 62.2 years, respectively) and in random comparators from the general population matched (1:5) on age, sex and region of domicile. Deaths from all causes during 2019 were also recorded.

RESULTS

Compared with the general population, incidence rates (IR) for COVID-19-associated hospitalization were higher in RA [IR ratio (IRR) 1.71(1.50-1.95)], SLE [2.0 (1.4-2.7)] and SSc [2.28 (1.29-3.90)], while COVID-19-associated death rates were higher in RA [1.91 (1.46-2.49)]. When focusing only on severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2-infected subjects, after adjusting for age and gender, the odds ratio for COVID-19 associated death was higher in RA [1.47 (1.11-1.94)] and SSc [2.92 (1.07-7.99)] compared with the general population. The all-cause mortality rate compared with the general population increased in RA during the first year of the pandemic (IRR 0.71) with reference to 2019 (0.59), and decreased in SSc (IRR 1.94 vs 4.36).

CONCLUSION

COVID-19 may have a more severe impact in patients with systemic rheumatic disease than in the general population. COVID-19-related mortality is increased in subgroups of patients with specific rheumatic diseases, underscoring the need for priority vaccination and access to targeted treatments.

Prevalence and patterns of anti-osteoporotic drug use based on 2019 real-world nationwide data in Greece

We used the Greek nationwide database to capture individuals on anti-osteoporotic treatment during 2019. From the estimated number of 683,679 osteoporotic individuals, only 42% were receiving treatment, with the total annual cost being almost one-tenth of the total cost of fractures. The treatment gap was significantly higher in males than in females.

INTRODUCTION

Based on the 2019 European scorecard (SCOPE), osteoporosis is diagnosed in an estimated 683,679 individuals in Greece, with the direct cost of incident fractures being €694.7 million, although further relevant real-world data are scarce.

METHODS

The e-Government Center for Social Security Services prescription database, which covers almost 100% of the Greek population, was used to capture all individuals on anti-osteoporotic treatment during 2019.

RESULTS

A total of 288,983 among 8,641,341 people, corresponding to 3.3% of the total adult Greek population, had filled at least one anti-osteoporotic prescription (6.0% and 0.36% for females and males, respectively). Prevalence of anti-osteoporotic treatment increased with age, from 0.15% in those younger than 50 to 8.6% in those older than 70 years. Oral bisphosphonates were more frequently prescribed (58.8%), followed by denosumab (39.4%). Alendronate was more frequently prescribed in males and in people younger than 60 years. Denosumab was more frequently prescribed in females and in people older than 60 years. Selective estrogen-receptor modulators, teriparatide, and parenteral bisphosphonates accounted for 1.1%, 1.0%, and 0.02% of all prescriptions, respectively. Orthopedic surgeons (39.6%), endocrinologists (19.6%), general practitioners (19%), and rheumatologists (9.3%) prescribed the vast majority of anti-osteoporotic regimens, with significant differences in prescription patterns. The annual cost of treatment per patient increased significantly with age, being on average €323.33.

CONCLUSIONS

Less than half of the estimated number of individuals with osteoporosis in 2019 in Greece received treatment, with the total annual cost being far less than the estimated cost of incident-fragility fractures. The impact of this undertreatment on related health care costs merits further investigation.

Anxiety levels before biologic initiation and changes with treatment in patients with psoriatic arthritis: HUR-BIO biologic registry results

OBJECTIVES

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is an inflammatory musculoskeletal disease related to several comorbidities. Anxiety is an important comorbidity in PsA and the data is scarce. We aimed to understand the rates before biologic agents and change in anxiety with the treatment.

METHODS

PsA patients from the Hacettepe University biologic database (HUR-BIO) were assessed for the high anxiety level (score ≥ 4) using the patient self-reported measure of anxiety on a 0-10 numerical scale, included in the Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease questionnaire (PSAID-12). The rate and scores of anxiety were determined before starting biologic agents, at the first visit within 6 months. Changes in anxiety scores were assessed according to favorable treatment responses, and the correlation was evaluated by Spearman correlation analysis.

RESULTS

From 520 patients registered, 147 [mean (SD) age 43.3 (12.4) years, 70.7% female] had anxiety score both at baseline and first visit within 6 months. Both the frequency of high anxiety level and mean (SD) scores decreased at the first visit [63.9% vs. 41.4%, 4.8 (3.4) vs. 3.2 (3.1) respectively, p < 0.001 for both] after a mean (SD) follow-up of 105.7 (22.2) days. There was also a positive correlation between the change in anxiety scores and all parameters tested for treatment response: pain, PGA, BASDAI, HAQ-DI, DAS-28, and also PsAID-12.

CONCLUSION

Anxiety is a more frequent problem at biologic initiation than rates observed in the general PsA population. The rates show a decreasing trend and correlates with treatment response but is still high within 6 months under treatment.

KEY POINTS

• As high as 65% of patients had a high anxiety levels before the initiation of bDMARDs. • The disease activity control is essential in reducing anxiety; however, rates are still high within 6 months. • Decreased anxiety scores and rates of the high anxiety level are linked to better outcomes.

[Medications when travelling with underlying inflammatory rheumatic disease]

Travelling poses particular challenges for patients with rheumatic diseases. This article provides specific guidance on how best to manage medication while away from home. Besides outlining advice on basic logistic issues, such as the transportation, importation and storage of drugs, the article concentrates on travelling while receiving immunosuppressive therapy and carrying narcotics. Especially when transporting narcotics, travel requires careful planning in advance in close collaboration with physicians on account of the strict and internationally diverse import restrictions on controlled substances. While travelling, all drugs should be kept in the original packaging, including the package insert and stored in carry-on luggage. A specific medical passport may be needed. Immunosuppressive and narcotic drugs require medical certificates issued by the prescribing physician, which may need to be certified by the responsible national agencies. Patients receiving glucocorticoid treatment who travel in or across multiple time zones should also be aware of how the medication impacts and interacts with circadian rhythms so as to optimize the anti-inflammatory effects of the drugs and to avoid unnecessary complications. Given the significant discrepancies in medical care and availability of medication worldwide, the article further stresses the importance of a comprehensive medical kit tailored to the patient's individual medicinal needs. Finally, as immunocompromised travellers are at increased risk of infections, advice is given on the use of anti-infective drugs and chemoprophylaxis for patients travelling to areas in which malaria is endemic as well as on their possible interactions with immunosuppressive treatment.