Efficacy and safety of intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator in mild ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis

Navigating the waters of acute minor stroke therapies: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Although acute minor stroke often presents with mild symptoms, such as unilateral limb weakness, mild aphasia, dizziness, or mild cognitive impairment, untreated outcomes could be poor, and optimal treatment methods are still debated.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to identify the optimum treatment for minor strokes with a network meta-analysis.

METHODS

Studies from Embase, Ovid, and Cochrane Library were considered. Randomized controlled trials and prospective cohort studies on ischemic stroke with a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score no more than 5, explicit intravenous thrombolysis, or antiplatelet therapy were included. Efficacy outcome was measured by 3-month modified Rankin scale (mRS), with primary outcome defined as mRS score of 0 to 1 and secondary outcome defined as mRS score of 0 to 2. Safety outcomes included symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) and mortality at 3 months.

RESULTS

Nine studies encompassing 10 665 patients were meta-analyzed. Aspirin plus clopidogrel (n = 4283) was more strongly associated with primary outcome than aspirin (n = 2128; odds ratio [OR], 1.26; 95% CI, 1.04∼1.54) and recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA; n = 1840; OR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.00∼1.50). Aspirin plus clopidogrel (n = 3933) also had a lower sICH risk than rt-PA (n = 2538; OR, 0.11; 95% CI, 0.04∼0.30) and tenecteplase (n = 194; OR, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.03∼0.68), as well as a lower mortality than aspirin alone (n = 830; OR, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.10∼0.71). Patients treated with aspirin (n = 815) also had a lower sICH risk than rt-PA (n = 2538; OR, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.04∼0.95).

CONCLUSION

Dual antiplatelet therapy based on aspirin and clopidogrel offers balanced efficacy and safety, positioning it as a potentially optimal treatment for minor stroke. rt-PA showed comparable efficacy, while its associated risks were more pronounced.

Antiplatelet therapy versus intravenous thrombolysis for mild acute ischaemic stroke: a living systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have shown contradictory results between early application of antiplatelet therapy and intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) for mild acute ischaemic stroke (AIS), with National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score 0-5.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the benefits and risks of antiplatelet therapy and IVT in patients with mild AIS.

METHODS

A systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Library was conducted from database inception until July 2023, without language restriction. Randomised clinical trials (RCTs) or observational studies were selected. The primary outcomes were 90-day functional outcomes, measured by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score. The protocol has been registered before data collection.

RESULTS

Two RCTs and four observational studies with relatively low risk of bias that enrolled 3975 patients were analysed (2454 in antiplatelet therapy and 1521 in IVT therapy). There were no significant differences between antiplatelet therapy and IVT in 90-day functional outcomes (mRS 0-1, OR 1.08 (95% CI 0.73 to 1.58); mRS 0-2, OR, 1.04 (95% CI 0.63 to 1.73)), death (OR, 0.64 (95% CI 0.19 to 2.13)) and stroke recurrence (OR, 0.71 (95% CI 0.28 to 1.79)). Antiplatelet therapy was associated with a reduced risk of symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage (sICH) compared with IVT (OR, 0.20 (95% CI 0.06 to 0.69)).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with mild AIS, compared with IVT, early application of antiplatelet therapy was not significantly associated with improved functional outcomes, reduced death or stroke recurrence, but was significantly associated with a reduced risk of sICH.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42023447862.

Safety and efficacy of intravenous thrombolysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 93,057 minor stroke patients

BACKGROUND

The definition of minor ischemic stroke (MIS) is a topic of debate, however, the most accepted definition is a stroke with National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) ≤ 5. Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) is a crucial treatment option for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) including: alteplase, recombinant human tissue-type plasminogen activator (r-tPA), and the recently approved tenecteplase. However, there is a debate regarding its safety and efficacy. Therefore, our objective was to determine the safety and efficacy of IVT in treating minor stroke patients (NIHSS ≤ 5).

METHODS

Using the search strategy assigned which was based on three keywords: "mild" or "minor", "stroke", and "intravenous thrombolysis", we searched for eligible articles on PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Scopus from inception till 10th January 2024. We conducted this meta-analysis using the random effect model to account for the heterogeneity among the studies. For the dichotomous variables, we calculated the odds ratio (OR) from the event and total of these variables. While for the continuous variables, we calculated the mean difference (MD) of these variables. Pooling of OR for the occurrence of events was also conducted.

RESULTS

A total of 21 articles with 93,057 patients with MIS were included. The mean age of the participants ranged from 62.3 to 79.6. Most of the included patients had comorbidities such as hypertension, diabetes, previous stroke, smoking, atrial fibrillation, and hyperlipidemia. Of these, 10,850 received IVT while 82,207 did not. The use of IVT was statistically significant associated with 90-day modified Rankin score (mRs) 0-1 when compared with control with OR of 1.67 (95%CI: 1.46, 1.91, p < 0.00001) and was statistically significantly associated with improvement of NIHSS on discharge with OR of 2.19 (95%CI: 1.56, 3.08, p < 0.00001). In terms of safety outcomes, IVT has proven a safe profile, as there was no significant difference in intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) and mortality rates between the IVT and control groups with OR of 1.75 (95CI: 0.95, 3.23, p = 0.07) and 0.93 (95%CI: 0.77, 1.11, p = 0.41), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Although some studies have not found any benefits of IVT in MIS patients, a substantial body of literature strongly endorses IVT as an effective and safe treatment for MIS. IVT has been shown to improve the mRs and NIHSS scores at the 90-day mark without an increased risk of ICH or mortality.

Thrombolytic therapy for patients with acute ischemic stroke: systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized trials

Objective

To systematically compare the benefits and risks of all thrombolytic agents (tenecteplase, reteplase, and alteplase) at different doses for thrombolytic therapy in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS).

Background

Alteplase is the cornerstone treatment for AIS, but alternative thrombolytic agents are needed. The efficacy and safety of tenecteplase and reteplase, compared to alteplase, remain unclear, as does the optimal dosing for these treatments.

Method

A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, SCOPUS, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) for relevant English-language studies up to July 5, 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing standard-dose alteplase with varying doses of tenecteplase or reteplase in AIS patients were included. Primary outcomes were functional outcome at 90 days, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, death within 90 days, and serious adverse events. Data on study characteristics, patient demographics, interventions, and outcomes were extracted, and bias risk assessed. A multivariate random-effects model was used for network meta-analysis to derive odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).

Result

Twelve RCTs were included (10 with tenecteplase, 2 with reteplase) involving 6,633 patients, all compared against 0.9 mg/kg alteplase. In comparison with alteplase, tenecteplase demonstrated OR of 1.08 for achieving an excellent functional outcome at 90 days (95% CI: 0.97 to 1.22, P = 0.17). Reteplase, on the other hand, showed a significantly higher OR of 1.55 for the same outcome (95% CI: 1.23 to 1.95, P = 0.0002). Reteplase at 18 mg + 18 mg (OR 1.6, 95% CI: 0.91-2.5) showed a higher probability of achieving an excellent functional outcome at 90 days compared to alteplase. When considering a good functional outcome at 90 days, tenecteplase had an OR of 1.03 (95% CI: 0.81 to 1.3, P = 0.82), while reteplase had an OR of 1.15 (95% CI: 0.61 to 2.19, P = 0.66). Tenecteplase at 0.25 mg/kg (OR 1.3, 95% CI: 0.79-2.5) had the highest probability of achieving a good functional outcome at 90 days. For safety outcomes, 0.25 mg/kg tenecteplase had lower incidences of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (OR 0.88, 95% CI: 0.35-1.8), death within 90 days (OR 0.91, 95% CI: 0.54-1.4), and serious adverse events (OR 1.0, 95% CI: 0.47-2.3) compared to alteplase, though differences were not statistically significant. Reteplase at 18 mg + 18 mg had higher incidences of death within 90 days (OR 1.2, 95% CI: 0.48-3) and serious adverse events (OR 1.4, 95% CI: 0.4-5.0) compared to alteplase, without significant differences. Subgroup analysis showed better efficacy with 0.25 mg/kg tenecteplase in Asians (OR 1.18, 95% CI 0.96-1.45, P = 0.12) than in Caucasians (OR 1.08, 95% CI 0.9-1.3, P = 0.39).

Conclusion

This study suggests that tenecteplase and reteplase are viable alternatives to alteplase for thrombolysis in AIS. Tenecteplase at 0.25 mg/kg and reteplase at 18 mg + 18 mg may offer better efficacy compared to standard-dose alteplase, although the risk of adverse events with reteplase should be considered. Tenecteplase at 0.25 mg/kg appears to provide the best benefit-risk profile based on current evidence. Further head-to-head trials of tenecteplase and reteplase are needed to determine the optimal thrombolytic agent and dosing.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, PROSPERO CRD42024566146.

Intravenous Thrombolysis Plus Tirofiban in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Acute ischemic stroke is a cerebrovascular disease associated with high disability and mortality. Tirofiban, a platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonist, is used in conjunction with IV thrombolysis for bridging therapy, but its effectiveness and safety compared with IV thrombolysis alone in patients with stroke are not well-established.

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine whether tirofiban increased the risk of poor outcomes and mortality in patients with stroke and accepted IV thrombolysis within the time window, or whether it can improve functional prognosis in follow-up.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched for randomized controlled trials and observational studies from inception to June 15, 2023. Trials reporting the effectiveness and safety of tirofiban bridging after IV thrombolysis compared with thrombolysis only in patients with acute ischemic stroke were included.

RESULTS

Two randomized controlled trials and 5 observational studies with 771 participants were included. Tirofiban plus IV thrombolysis significantly favored improved neurologic function based on both modified Rankin Scale 0-2 (risk ratio [RR] 1.38; p < 0.001) and 0-1 (RR 1.54; p < 0.001) at month 3. There was no significant difference in 3-month mortality risk, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage on the seventh day, and systemic bleeding between the 2 groups (RR 1.11; p = 0.780; RR 0.68; p = 0.670; RR 1.97; p = 0.510).

CONCLUSIONS

Tirofiban plus intravenous thrombolysis was associated with better functional outcomes, but not symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, systemic bleedings, or mortality among patients with acute ischemic stroke compared with IV thrombolysis only. Further studies should focus on its safety profile and application to target patients.

Effects of intravenous rtPA in patients with minor stroke

BACKGROUND

Whether minor ischemic stroke (MIS) patients can benefit from intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) remains controversial. The association between the efficacy of IVT and baseline National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score is unclear in MIS, while the association in moderate and severe stroke is known. This study aimed to explore the effect of IVT in patients with MIS and analyze its efficacy in patients with different baseline NIHSS scores.

METHODS

Patients with a NIHSS score ≤5 within 4.5 h of stroke onset were screened in 32 centers. Patients with and without IVT were matched to a ratio of 1:1 with propensity scores. An excellent outcome was defined as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score ≤1 at three months after stroke onset. Safety outcomes included mortality and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH). Multivariate analysis was used to compute the adjusted odds ratio (OR) for excellent outcomes. The effect of IVT was further analyzed in subgroups according to the baseline NIHSS score.

RESULTS

Of the 23,853 screened, 3336 patients with MIS who arrived at the hospital within 4.5 h of onset were included. The 1163 patients treated with IVT were matched with 1163 patients without IVT. IVT in minor strokes generated an adjusted OR of 1.38 (95% CI: 1.09-1.75, p = 0.009) for excellent outcomes. There were no significant differences in mortality (0.17% vs. 0.09%, p = 1.000) and sICH (0.69% vs. 0.86%, p = 0.813) between patients with and without IVT. Subgroup analysis showed that there was no significant effect of IVT in the baseline NIHSS 0-1 or 2-3 subgroups, with adjusted OR of 0.816 (95% CI 0.437-1.53, p = 0.525) and1.22 (95% CI 0.845-1.77, p = 0.287), respectively. In patients with NIHSS score of 4-5, IVT was significantly effective, with an adjusted OR of 1.53 (95% CI 1.02-2.30, p = 0.038).

CONCLUSION

IVT can improve MIS outcomes. The risks of sICH and mortality did not increase, especially in patients with NIHSS scores 4 to 5, who could benefit from IVT significantly.

Intravenous alteplase in minor nondisabling ischemic stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Minor ischemic stroke, defined as National Institute of Health Stroke Scale score of 0-5 on admission, represents half of all acute ischemic strokes. The role of intravenous alteplase (IVA) among patients with minor stroke is inconclusive; therefore, we evaluated clinical outcomes of these patients treated with or without IVA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We searched Medline, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane library until August 1, 2023. Inclusion was restricted to the English literature of studies that reported on minor nondisabling stroke patients treated with or without IVA. Odds ratios (ORs) with their corresponding 95% CIs were utilized using a random-effects model. Efficacy outcomes included rates of excellent (modified Rankin scale [mRS] of 0-1) and good (mRS of 0-2) functional outcome at 90 days. The main safety outcome was symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH).

RESULTS

Five eligible studies, two RCTs and three observational studies, comprising 2764 patients (31.8% female) met inclusion criteria. IVA was administered to 1559 (56.4%) patients. Pooled analysis of the two RCTs revealed no difference between the two groups in terms of 90-days excellent functional outcomes (OR 0.76 [95% CI, 0.51-1.13]; I2 = 0%) and sICH rates (OR 3.76 [95% CI, 0.61-23.20]). No significant differences were observed between the groups in terms of good functional outcomes, 90-day mortality, and 90-day stroke recurrence.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis of minor nondisabling stroke suggests that IVA did not prove more beneficial compared to no-IVA.

Combining Intravenous Thrombolysis and Dual Antiplatelet Treatment in Patients With Minor Ischemic Stroke: A Propensity Matched Analysis of the READAPT Study Cohort

BACKGROUND

The optimal treatment for acute minor ischemic stroke is still undefined. and options include dual antiplatelet treatment (DAPT), intravenous thrombolysis (IVT), or their combination. We aimed to investigate benefits and risks of combining IVT and DAPT versus DAPT alone in patients with MIS.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This is a prespecified propensity score-matched analysis from a prospective multicentric real-world study (READAPT [Real-Life Study on Short-Term Dual Antiplatelet Treatment in Patients With Ischemic Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack]). We included patients with MIS (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score at admission ≤5), without prestroke disability (modified Rankin scale [mRS] score ≤2). The primary outcomes were 90-day mRS score of 0 to 2 and ordinal mRS distribution. The secondary outcomes included 90-day risk of stroke and other vascular events and 24-hour early neurological improvement or deterioration (≥2-point National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score decrease or increase from the baseline, respectively). From 1373 patients with MIS, 240 patients treated with IVT plus DAPT were matched with 427 patients treated with DAPT alone. At 90 days, IVT plus DAPT versus DAPT alone showed similar frequency of mRS 0 to 2 (risk difference, 2.3% [95% CI -2.0% to 6.7%]; P=0.295; risk ratio, 1.03 [95% CI 0.98-1.08]; P=0.312) but more favorable ordinal mRS scores distribution (odds ratio, 0.57 [95% CI 0.41-0.79]; P<0.001). Compared with patients treated with DAPT alone, those combining IVT and DAPT had higher 24-hour early neurological improvement (risk difference, 20.9% [95% CI 13.1%-28.6%]; risk ratio, 1.59 [95% CI 1.34-1.89]; both P<0.001) and lower 90-day risk of stroke and other vascular events (hazard ratio, 0.27 [95% CI 0.08-0.90]; P=0.034). There were no differences in safety outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

According to findings from this observational study, patients with MIS may benefit in terms of better functional outcome and lower risk of recurrent events from combining IVT and DAPT versus DAPT alone without safety concerns.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT05476081.

Intravenous thrombolysis versus dual antiplatelet therapy for patients with acute minor ischaemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background and purpose

The efficacy of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in patients with acute minor ischaemic stroke (AMIS) remains unclear. We performed a meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of IVT and dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in patients with AMIS.

Methods

The Embase, Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Web of Science databases were searched up to 10 October, 2023. Prospective and retrospective studies comparing the clinical outcomes of IVT and DAPT were included. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for early neurological deterioration (END), excellent and favourable functional outcomes, recurrent ischaemic stroke at 3 months, mortality at 3 months, and symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage (ICH) were pooled using a random-effects model.

Results

Of the five included studies, 6,340 patients were included. In patients with AMIS, IVT was not significantly associated with excellent and favourable functional outcomes, recurrent ischaemic stroke, or all-cause mortality at 3 months compared to early DAPT. However, a higher risk of symptomatic ICH (OR, 9.31; 95% CI, 3.39-25.57) and END (OR, 2.75; 95% CI, 1.76-4.30) were observed with IVT.

Conclusion

This meta-analysis indicated that IVT was not superior to DAPT in patients with AMIS, especially in those with nondisabling AIS. However, these findings should be interpreted with caution and have some limitations. Further, well-designed randomised controlled trials are warranted.

Intravenous Alteplase Versus Best Medical Therapy for Patients With Minor Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of thrombolysis (IVT) in minor stroke (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, 0-5) remains inconclusive. The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness and safety of IVT with best medical therapy (BMT) by means of a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and observational studies.

METHODS

We searched the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases to obtain articles related to IVT in minor stroke from inception until August 10, 2023. The primary outcome was an excellent functional outcome, defined as a modified Rankin Scale score of 0 or 1 at 90 days. The associations were calculated for the overall and preformulated subgroups by using the odds ratios (ORs). This study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023445856).

RESULTS

A total of 20 high-quality studies, comprised of 13 397 patients with acute minor ischemic stroke, were included. There were no significant differences observed in the modified Rankin Scale scores of 0 to 1 (OR, 1.10 [95% CI, 0.89-1.37]) and 0 to 2 (OR, 1.16 [95% CI, 0.95-1.43]), mortality rates (OR, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.39-1.15]), recurrent stroke (OR, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.57-1.38]), and recurrent ischemic stroke (OR, 1.09 [95% CI, 0.68-1.73]) between the IVT and BMT group. There were differences between the IVT group and the BMT group in terms of early neurological deterioration (OR, 1.81 [95% CI, 1.17-2.80]), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (OR, 7.48 [95% CI, 3.55-15.76]), and hemorrhagic transformation (OR, 4.73 [95% CI, 2.40-9.34]). Comparison of modified Rankin Scale score of 0 to 1 remained unchanged in subgroup patients with nondisabling deficits or compared with those using antiplatelets.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings indicate that IVT does not yield significant improvement in the functional prognosis of patients with acute minor ischemic stroke. Additionally, it is associated with an increased risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage when compared with the BMT. Moreover, IVT may not have superiority over BMT in patients with nondisabling deficits or those using antiplatelets.

A cell-penetrating peptide exerts therapeutic effects against ischemic stroke by mediating the lysosomal degradation of sirtuin 5

Stroke is a major public health concern worldwide. The lack of effective therapies heightens the need for new therapeutic agents. Previous study identified sirtuin 5 (SIRT5) as a positive regulator of microglia-induced excessive neuroinflammation following ischemic stroke. Interventions targeting SIRT5 should therefore alleviate neuroinflammation and protect against ischemic stroke. Here, we synthesized a membrane-permeable peptide specifically bound to SIRT5 through a chaperone-mediated autophagy targeting motif (Tat-SIRT5-CTM) and examined its therapeutic effect in vitro and in vivo. First, in primary microglia, Tat-SIRT5-CTM suppressed the binding of SIRT5 with annexin-A1 (ANXA1), leading to SIRT5 degradation and thus inhibition of SIRT5-mediated desuccinylation of ANXA1, followed by increased membrane accumulation and secretion of ANXA1. These changes, in turn, alleviated microglia-induced neuroinflammation. Moreover, following intravenous injection, Tat-SIRT5-CTM could efficiently pass through the blood‒brain barrier. Importantly, systemic administration of Tat-SIRT5-CTM reduced the brain infarct area and neuronal loss, mitigated neurological deficit scores, and improved long-term neurological functions in a mouse model of ischemic stroke. Furthermore, no toxicity was observed when high doses Tat-SIRT5-CTM were injected into nonischemic mice. Collectively, our study reveals the promising efficacy of the peptide-directed lysosomal degradation of SIRT5 and suggests it as an effective therapeutic approach for the treatment of ischemic stroke.

Multidimensional Outcomes of IV Thrombolysis in Minor Ischemic Stroke: Motor, Psychocognitive, and Dependence

Background

The presence of mild deficit is the most common reason for nonuse of intravenous alteplase in ischemic stroke. We analyzed within a national prospective cohort on whether patients with minor stroke can benefit from intravenous alteplase.

Methods

This observational study included patients with acute ischemic stroke with a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score 0 to 5 at admission. The short-term outcomes at discharge and 3-month were analyzed including the modified Rankin Scale score, gait speed, Montreal Cognitive Assessment, Patient Health Questionnaire-9, General Anxiety Disorder-7 and Stroke Impact Scale-16. Multivariate regression models were performed to evaluate the association between intravenous thrombolysis and clinical outcomes.

Results

A total of 1876 consecutive patients were included in the current analyses with 102 patients (5.4%) received alteplase and 1774 patients (94.5%) were in non-alteplase group. We found that 10.9% patients presented unfavorable functional outcome with a mRS ≥ 2 at 3-month. Patients with alteplase treatment had a more favorable outcome in SIS-16 at discharge (OR, 5.45; 95% CI, 2.22-8.68) and 3-month after stroke (OR, 2.34; 95% CI, 0.17-4.50). There was an association of alteplase with better gait speed in the restricted sample of age >60 (OR,0.14; 95% CI, 0.02-0.25), while an unfavorable effect was found in anxiety (OR, 2.23; 95% CI, 2.23, 0.91-3.55) and depression (OR, 1.54; 95% CI, 0.17-2.91) in female.

Conclusion

Alteplase showed a suggestive benefit in function and motor outcomes in patients with low NIHSS score of 0-5. Meanwhile, female seemed more inclined to post-stroke emotional problems after alteplase treatment, which should be further explored in the future.

IV Thrombolysis vs Early Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients With Mild Noncardioembolic Ischemic Stroke

BACKGROUND OBJECTIVES

It is unclear whether IV thrombolysis (IVT) outperforms early dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in the acute setting of mild ischemic stroke. The aim of this study was to compare the early safety and efficacy of IVT with that of DAPT.

METHODS

Data of mild noncardioembolic stroke patients with admission NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score ≤3 who received IVT or early DAPT in the period 2018-2021 were extracted from a nationwide, prospective stroke unit registry. Study endpoints included symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH), early neurologic deterioration ≥4 NIHSS points (END), and 3-month functional outcome by modified Rankin scale (mRS).

RESULTS

A total of 1,195 mild stroke patients treated with IVT and 2,625 patients treated with DAPT were included. IVT patients were younger (68.1 vs 70.8 years), had less hypertension (72.8% vs 83.5%), diabetes (19% vs 28.8%), and a history of myocardial infarction (7.6% vs 9.2%), and slightly higher admission NIHSS scores (median 2 vs median 1) when compared with DAPT patients. After propensity score matching and multivariable adjustment, IVT was associated with sICH (4 [1.2%] vs 0) and END (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.8, 95% CI 1.1-7.5), and there was no difference in mRS 0-1 at 3 months (aOR 1.3, 95% CI 0.7-2.6).

DISCUSSION

This analysis from a prospective nationwide stroke unit network indicates that IVT is not superior to DAPT in the setting of mild noncardioembolic stroke and may eventually be associated with harm. Further research focusing on acute therapy of mild stroke is highly warranted.

CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE

This study provides Class III evidence that IVT is not superior to DAPT in patients with acute mild (NIHSS score ≤3) noncardioembolic stroke. The study lacks the statistical precision to exclude clinically important superiority of either therapy.

The use of alteplase, although safe, does not offer clear clinical advantages when mild stroke is non-disabling

Introduction

It is unknown whether alteplase is effective and safe in patients with mild acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Determining whether symptoms are "disabling" or not is a crucial factor in the management of these patients. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of alteplase in patients with mild, non-disabling AIS.

Methods

We included all consecutive patients admitted for AIS at our institution from January 2015 to May 2022 who presented a baseline NIHSS score of 0-5 and fit the criteria to receive intravenous thrombolysis. In order to select only subjects with non-disabling AIS, we excluded patients who scored more than 1 point in the following NIHSS single items: vision, language, neglect, and single limb. Patients who scored at least 1 point in the NIHSS consciousness item were excluded as well. This study is a retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database.

Results

After the application of the exclusion criteria, we included 319 patients, stratified into patients receiving and not receiving alteplase based on non-disabling symptoms. The two groups were comparable regarding demographic and clinical data. Rates of a 3-month favorable outcome, defined as a 3-month mRS score of 0-1, were similar, being 82.3% and 86.1% in the treated and untreated patients, respectively. Hemorrhagic complications and mortality occurred infrequently and were not affected by alteplase treatment.

Discussion

This observational study suggests that the use of alteplase, although safe, is not associated with a better outcome in highly selected patients with non-disabling AIS.

Best medical management versus intravenous thrombolysis for mild non-disabling ischemic stroke: A prospective noninferiority registry study

OBJECTIVES

The efficacy and safety of intravenous thrombolysis uncertain in patients with non-disabling mild ischemic stroke. Our aim was to investigate whether best medical management only is noninferior to intravenous thrombolysis plus best medical management therapy for achieving favorable functional outcome at 90 days.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In a prospective acute ischemic stroke registry from 2018 through 2020, 314 non-disabling mild ischemic stroke patients received best medical management only and 638 underwent intravenous thrombolysis plus best medical management. The primary outcome was modified Rankin Scale ≤1 at Day 90. The noninferiority margin was -5%. Secondary outcomes of hemorrhagic transformation, early neurologic deterioration and mortality were also evaluated.

RESULTS

The best medical management only was noninferior to the combined therapy of intravenous thrombolysis and best medical management with regard to the primary outcome (unadjusted risk difference, 1.16%; 95% CI, -3.48% ∼ 5.8%; p = 0.0046 for noninferiority; adjusted risk difference, 3.01%; 95% CI, -3.39% ∼ 9.41%). After propensity score matching, p < 0.0001 for noninferiority. RD, 4.03%; 95% CI, -1.59% ∼ 9.69%. p < 0.0001 for noninferiority. Adjusted RD, 5.23%; 95% CI, -1.88% ∼ 9.97%. The occurrence of hemorrhagic transformation was significantly increased in the group of combination therapy (OR, 4.26; 95% CI, 1.30 to 13.99; p = 0.008), while no significant difference was detected in early neurologic deterioration (OR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.49-2.52; p = 0.808) and mortality (OR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.20 to 1.69; p = 0.214) between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In the present study, we found the best medical management only was noninferior to the combination therapy of intravenous thrombolysis plus best medical management for non-disabling mild ischemic stroke within 4.5 h after onset. Best medical management may be a treatment of choice for non-disabling mild ischemic stroke patients. Further randomized controlled studies are warranted.

Outcomes in minor stroke patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis

AIMS

Our study aimed to describe the short-, medium-, and long-term outcomes of intravenous thrombolysis in minor stroke, and to explore the relationship between thrombolysis and clinical outcomes.

METHODS

Our study included ischemic minor stroke patients (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score ≤ 5) within 4.5 h from symptom onset from the Third China National Stroke Registry (CNSR-III) between August 2015 and March 2018. The primary outcome was a favorable functional outcome, defined as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0-1 at 3 months. The secondary outcomes included mRS score of 0-1 at discharge, 6 months, and 1 year. The safety outcomes were symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) at 24-36 h and all-cause mortality. The association between intravenous thrombolysis and clinical outcomes was studied using multivariable models.

RESULTS

A total of 1905 minor ischemic stroke patients were included. Overall 527 patients (28%) received intravenous t-PA (IV t-PA) and 1378 patients (72%) in the non-IV t-PA group. Of them, 18.85% (359/1905) participants had a disabled outcome (defined as mRS score ≥ 2) at discharge, 12.8% (242/1885) at 3 months, 13.9% (262/1886) at 6 months, and 13.9% (260/1871) at 1 year. In multivariable analysis, IV t-PA was associated with favorable functional outcomes at discharge (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.49; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.13-1.96; p = 0.004), 3 months (aOR 1.51; 95% CI 1.09-2.10; p = 0.01), 6 months (aOR 1.64; 95% CI 1.19-2.27; p = 0.003), and 1 year (aOR 1.52; 95% CI 1.10-2.10; p = 0.01). Symptomatic ICH occurred in 3 (0.6%) patients in IV t-PA versus 2 (0.1%) in the non-IV t-PA group. No significant differences were found in all-cause mortality between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Intravenous t-PA may be safe and effective in minor stroke (NIHSS ≤ 5) within a 4.5-h window and further randomized controlled trials are warranted.

Reasons withholding intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke in an Indonesian Tertiary Center

Background

Intravenous thrombolysis is the current therapy of choice in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). While highly effective, the rate at which the procedure is employed is low. Studies evaluating the causes withholding thrombolytic treatment in developing nations remain scarce. We aim to determine the factors withholding thrombolytic treatment in AIS patients.

Methods

This is a retrospective study of AIS patients at Siloam Hospitals Lippo Village, Indonesia, in a 10-month period between April 2019 to February 2020. Patient data were collected from the medical records.

Results

One hundred and forty-five cases of AIS were found within a 10-month period (April 2019 to February 2020). Thrombolysis was performed in 6.90% of all patients with AIS (21.28% when adjusted for eligible patients with onset ≤ 4.5 h). Prehospital delay exceeding 4.5 h was the most common cause of withholding thrombolytic treatment (68.28% of patients present above 4.5 h or with unknown onset). Among patients presenting ≤ 4.5 h, causes withholding thrombolysis include clinical improvement (35.14%), mild non-disabling symptoms (32.43%), patient/family refusal (18.92%), extensive infarction (5.41%), seizures at onset (2.7%), as well as history of acute bleeding diathesis (2.7%) and gastrointestinal bleeding (2.7%).

Conclusions

Prehospital delay constitutes the primary obstacle toward receiving thrombolytic therapy for AIS, especially in developing countries. Among patients with onset below 4.5 h, other notable causes include clinical improvement, mild non-disabling symptoms, and patient/family refusal. Of note, the rate of patient/family refusal in our study was much higher compared to previous findings, which may reflect possible socio-economic, communication, or educational issues.

Intravenous Thrombolysis is Effective in Mild Stroke Patients with an Admission NIHSS Score of 3 to 5

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The role of intravenous thrombolysis in patients with acute mild ischemic stroke remains highly controversial. Therefore, this study aims to analyze the efficacy and safety of intravenous thrombolysis in patients with mild ischemic stroke based on admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score.

METHODS

The present study enrolled 507 patients with acute mild ischemic stroke admitted within 4.5 hours of symptom onset with an admission NIHSS score of 0 to 5. Patients were assigned to two groups based on admission NIHSS scores of 0 to 2 and 3 to 5, and subsequent analyses compared functional outcomes between thrombotic and non-thrombotic patients within these groups. The primary outcome was a modified Rankin score (mRS) of 0 or 1 at 90 days, representing functional independence. The safety outcomes were symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), early neurological deterioration (END), and the rate of stroke recurrence within 90 days.

RESULTS

Among the 267 patients with NIHSS scores of 0 to 2, 112 (41.9%) patients received intravenous thrombolysis. Overall, thrombolysis administration did not significantly improve the patient's functional prognoses at 90 days (adjusted OR=1.046, 95%CI=0.587-1.863, p = 0.878). However, there was a marked increase in the risk of sICH (p = 0.030). Of the 240 patients with NIHSS scores of 3 to 5, 155 (64.6%) patients received intravenous thrombolysis, resulting in a significant improvement in 90-day functional prognosis (adjusted OR=3.284, 95%CI=1.876- 5.749, p < 0.001) compared to those that did not receive thrombolysis intervention. Importantly, there was no significant increase in sICH incidence (adjusted OR=2.770, 95%CI=0.313-24.51, p = 0.360). There were no statistically significant differences in END or the rate of stroke recurrence within 90 days between thrombotic and non-thrombotic groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Intravenous thrombolysis is safe and effective in patients with baseline NIHSS scores of 3 to 5. In contrast, it did not improve 90-day functional outcomes in patients with NIHSS scores of 0 to 2 and instead increased the risk of sICH.

SENP6 induces microglial polarization and neuroinflammation through de-SUMOylation of Annexin-A1 after cerebral ischaemia–reperfusion injury

Background

Previous data have reported that Sentrin/SUMO-specific protease 6 (SENP6) is involved in ischaemic brain injury and induces neuronal apoptosis after cerebral ischaemia, but the role of SENP6 in microglia-induced neuroinflammation and its underlying mechanism remain poorly understood. This research systematically explored the function and potential mechanism of SENP6 in microglia-induced neuroinflammation after ischaemic stroke.

Results

We first identified an increased protein level of SENP6 in microglia after cerebral ischaemia. Then, we demonstrated that SENP6 promoted detrimental microglial phenotype polarization. Specifically, SENP6-mediated de-SUMOylation of ANXA1 targeted the IκB kinase (IKK) complex and selectively inhibited the autophagic degradation of IKKα in an NBR1-dependent manner, activating the NF-κB pathway and enhancing proinflammatory cytokine expression. In addition, downregulation of SENP6 in microglia effectively reduced cocultured neuronal damage induced by ischaemic stroke. More importantly, we employed an AAV-based technique to specifically knockdown SENP6 in microglia/macrophages, and in vivo experiments showed that SENP6 inhibition in microglia/macrophages notably lessened brain ischaemic infarct size, decreased neurological deficit scores, and ameliorated motor and cognitive function in mice subjected to cerebral ischaemia surgery.

Conclusion

We demonstrated a previously unidentified mechanism by which SENP6-mediated ANXA1 de-SUMOylation regulates microglial polarization and our results strongly indicated that in microglia, inhibition of SENP6 may be a crucial beneficial therapeutic strategy for ischaemic stroke.

Graphical Abstract

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13578-022-00850-2.

Reasons and predictors of non-thrombolysis in patients with acute ischemic stroke admitted within 4.5 h

Objectives

Thrombolytic treatment in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) reduces stroke‐related disability. Nearly 40% of all patients with AIS (<4.5 h) receive thrombolysis, but there is a large variation in the use between hospitals. Little is known about reasons and predictors for not giving thrombolytic treatment. Therefore, we aimed to investigate reasons for non‐thrombolysis in patients admitted within 4.5 h.

Methods

All patients with AIS (<4.5 h) admitted to Akershus University Hospital, Norway, between January 2015 and December 2017 were examined. Patient characteristics and reasons for not giving thrombolysis were registered. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression analyses were performed.

Results

Of 535 patients admitted with AIS (<4.5 h), 250 (47%) did not receive thrombolysis and of these only 26% had an absolute contraindication to treatment. Among the 74% with relative contraindications, the most common reasons given were mild and improving symptoms. Previous stroke (OR 3.32, 95%CI 1.99–5.52), arriving between 3 h and 4.5 h after onset (OR 7.76, 95%CI 3.73–16.11) or having mild symptoms (OR 2.33, 95%CI 1.56–3.49) were all significant predictors of not receiving thrombolytic treatment in the multivariable logistic regression model.

Conclusion

A large proportion of patients with AIS do not receive thrombolysis. This study highlights up‐to‐date findings that arriving late in the time window, mild symptoms, and previous stroke are strong predictors of non‐treatment. It is uncertain whether there is an underuse of thrombolysis in AIS. Increasing the utility of thrombolysis in the 4.5 h time window must be weighed against possible harms.

Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients With Minor Stroke Receiving Intravenous Thrombolysis

Introduction

Concern over the potential severe bleeding risk of dual antiplatelet therapy for patients with minor stroke after intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) leads to different antiplatelet strategies in the secondary prevention of stroke. Our aim was to investigate the effect of dual antiplatelet therapy on patients with minor ischemic stroke receiving IVT.

Methods

From November 2016 to April 2021, a total of 855 consecutive patients who received IVT were observed. We collected and analyzed demographic characteristics, medical history, clinical information, and important time metrics of patients with minor ischemic stroke. Comparative and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to explore the clinical significance of single or dual antiplatelet therapy after IVT. Propensity score matching analyses (1:1 matching including baseline characteristics of patients) were also performed.

Results

A total of 245 patients were enrolled in the study (118 patients in the single antiplatelet therapy group and 127 patients in the dual antiplatelet group). No significant difference was found in baseline characteristics except stroke etiology (p &lt; 0.001) for patients with minor stroke. The dual antiplatelet group showed a higher proportion of 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) (0–1) than the single antiplatelet group (p = 0.030). Furthermore, patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy had excellent outcomes (90-day mRS 0–1) after adjustment (odds ratio [OR] 2.76, 95% CI 1.27–6.01, p = 0.010). Other secondary outcomes (recurrent stroke within 90 days, symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage, and early neurological deterioration) were not significantly different between the two groups. These findings were generally consistent in propensity score analyses.

Conclusions

Dual antiplatelet therapy may be a potential therapeutic approach in patients with minor stroke receiving IVT. Further randomized controlled trials are required to confirm this finding.

Predictors of the functional outcome after thrombolysis in an Egyptian patients’ sample

Background

About 6.2 million individuals worldwide and approximately 200 Egyptians/100,000 citizens have cerebrovascular stroke annually, and only less than 1% of stroke patients received intravenous (IV) thrombolysis in 2014. Outcome of the ischemic stroke after IV thrombolysis varies, and there is lack of data about the predicting factors that contributes to the outcome of ischemic strokes after IV thrombolysis in Egypt.

Objective

The aim of this work is to study the predictors of the functional outcome of ischemic cerebrovascular stroke after IV thrombolysis in Egyptian patients.

Patients and methods

This is a prospective study that includes acute ischemic stroke patients who received IV thrombolysis at the Alexandria University Hospital during the year from February 2017 to February 2018, and they were evaluated initially by Rapid Arterial Occlusion Evaluation (RACE) scale and followed-up serially for 6 months after thrombolysis using the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) and modified ranking score (mRS).

Results

Forty-five patients are included; 56% had favorable functional outcome (mRS 0–2) after 6 months, 68% had ≥ 4 points improvement in NIHSS after 6 months, and 13% had hemorrhagic conversion with 18% mortality rate. High initial RACE scale and long hospital stay are associated with poor functional outcome 6 months after thrombolysis.

Conclusion

Stroke severity demonstrated by high initial RACE and the duration of hospital stay are the two most significant predictors with an impact on the functional outcome of ischemic cerebrovascular stroke after thrombolysis.

Intra-arterial combination therapy for experimental acute ischemic stroke

Acute ischemic stroke continues to devastate millions of individuals worldwide. Current treatments work to restore blood flow but not rescue affected tissue. Our goal was to develop a combination of neuroprotective agents administered intra-arterially following recanalization to target ischemic tissue. Using C57Bl/6J male mice, we performed tandem transient ipsilateral middle cerebral/common carotid artery occlusion, followed by immediate intra-arterial pharmacotherapy administration through a standardized protocol. Two pharmacotherapy agents, verapamil and lubeluzole, were selected based on their potential to modulate different aspects of the ischemic cascade; verapamil, a calcium channel blocker, works in an acute fashion blocking L-type calcium channels, whereas lubeluzole, an N-methyl-D-aspartate modulator, works in a delayed fashion blocking intracellular glutamate trafficking. We hypothesized that combination therapy would provide complimentary and potentially synergistic benefit treating brain tissue undergoing various stages of injury. Physiological measurements for heart rate and pulse distention (blood pressure) demonstrated no detrimental effects between groups, suggesting that the combination drug administration is safe. Tissue analysis demonstrated a significant difference between combination and control (saline) groups in infarct volume, neuronal health, and astrogliosis. Although a significant difference in functional outcome was not observed, we did note that the combination treatment group had a greater percent change from baseline in forced motor movement as compared with controls. This study demonstrates the safety and feasibility of intra-arterial combination therapy following successful recanalization and warrants further study.

The Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Thrombolysis in Older Chinese Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke

To study the efficacy and safety of intravenous thrombolysis for the older acute ischemic stroke patients, clinical data were prospectively analyzed from 168 patients with acute ischemic stroke including 42 older adult patients (ET group), 66 younger patients (NET group) treated with rt-PA, and 60 older adult patients treated without rt-PA (ENT group). Stroke severity was assessed with an NIHSS score at baseline, 1-day and 14-day after treatment. Functional outcomes were evaluated by the modified Rankin scale and a Barthel index. Adverse effects were observed during the treatment. The rate of "good" prognosis was higher in the ET group than that in the ENT group at 90 days post-stroke. In older patients with stroke, thrombolytic therapy was found to be of greater benefit to patients with lower NIHSS scores at baseline, or patients classified as posterior circulation infarction, than for patients with higher NIHSS scores or infarctions located in other brain regions. Thrombolytic therapy may exhibit long-term efficacy by improving the future quality of life for older stroke patients with fewer bleeding risk factors and lower baseline NIHSS scores.

Inhibition of SENP6 restrains cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury by regulating Annexin-A1 nuclear translocation-associated neuronal apoptosis

Rationale: Annexin-A1 (ANXA1) has previously been proposed to play a crucial role in neuronal apoptosis during ischemic stroke injury. Our recent study demonstrated that ANXA1 was modified by SUMOylation, and that this modification was greatly weakened after cerebral ischemia, but its effect on neuronal death and the underlying mechanism have not been fully elucidated. Methods: Mice subjected to middle cerebral artery occlusion were established as the animal model and primary cultured neurons treated with oxygen-glucose deprivation and reperfusion was established as the cell model of ischemic stroke. The Ni²⁺-NTA agarose affinity pull-down assay was carried out to determine the SUMOylation level of ANXA1. Co-immunoprecipitation assays was utilized to explore the protein interaction. Immunoblot analysis, quantitative real-time PCR, Luciferase reporter assay were performed to identify the regulatory mechanism. LDH release and TUNEL staining was performed to investigate the neuronal cytotoxicity and apoptosis, respectively. Results: In this study, we identified the deSUMOylating enzyme sentrin/SUMO-specific protease 6 (SENP6) as a negative regulator of ANXA1 SUMOylation. Notably, we found that SENP6-mediated deSUMOylation of ANXA1 induced its nuclear translocation and triggered neuronal apoptosis during cerebral ischemic injury. A mechanistic study demonstrated that SENP6-mediated deSUMOylation of ANXA1 promoted TRPM7- and PKC-dependent phosphorylation of ANXA1. Furthermore, blocking the deSUMOylation of ANXA1 mediated by SENP6 inhibited the transcriptional activity of p53, decreased Bid expression, suppressed caspase-3 pathway activation and reduced the apoptosis of primary neurons subjected to oxygen-glucose deprivation and reperfusion. More importantly, SENP6 inhibition by overexpression of a SENP6 catalytic mutant in neurons resulted in significant improvement in neurological function in the mouse model of ischemic stroke. Conclusions: Taken together, the results of this study identified a previously unidentified function of SENP6 in neuronal apoptosis and strongly indicated that SENP6 inhibition may provide therapeutic benefits for cerebral ischemia.

Predictors of Outcomes in Patients With Mild Ischemic Stroke Symptoms: MaRISS

[Figure: see text].

Intravenous thrombolysis in stroke with admission NIHSS score 0 or 1

BACKGROUND

Up to 30% of stroke patients initially presenting with non-disabling or mild deficits may experience poor functional outcome. Despite, intravenous thrombolysis remains controversial in this subgroup of stroke patients due to its uncertain risk benefit ratio.

AIM

We aimed to analyze the real-world experience with intravenous thrombolysis in stroke patients presenting with very low NIHSS.

METHODS

Data of stroke patients presenting with mild initial stroke severity (NIHSS 0-5) including vascular risk factors, stroke syndrome and etiology, early neurological deterioration, symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage (sICH), and functional outcome by modified Rankin Scale were extracted from a large nationwide stroke registry and analysed. Patients were categorized and compared according to admission severity NIHSS 0-1 versus NIHSS 2-5 and intravenous thrombolysis use.

RESULTS

Seven hundred and three (2%) of 35,113 patients presenting with NIHSS 0-1 and 6316 (13.9%) of 45,521 of patients presenting with NIHSS 2-5 underwent intravenous thrombolysis. In the NIHSS 0-1 group, intravenous thrombolysis was associated with early neurological deterioration (adjusted OR 8.84, CI 6.61-11.83), sICH (adjusted OR 9.32, CI 4.53-19.15) and lower rate of excellent outcome (mRS 0-1) at three months (adjusted OR 0.67, CI 0.5-0.9). In stroke patients with NIHSS 2-5, intravenous thrombolysis was associated with early neurological deterioration (adjusted OR 1.7, 1.47-1.98), sICH (adjusted OR 5.75, CI 4.45-7.45), and higher rate of excellent outcome (mRS 0-1) at three months (adjusted OR 1.21, CI 1.08-1.34).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with NIHSS 0-1, intravenous thrombolysis did not increase the likelihood of excellent outcome. Moreover, potential signals of harm were observed. Further research seems to be warranted.

Impact of recanalisation by mechanical thrombectomy in mild acute ischemic stroke with large anterior vessel occlusion

BACKGROUND

The net clinical benefit of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in patients presenting acute anterior circulation ischemic stroke with large-vessel occlusion (AIS-LVO) and mild neurological deficit is uncertain.

AIMS

To investigate efficacy and safety of MT in patients with acute AIS-LVO and mild neurological deficit by evaluating i) the influence of recanalisation on three-month outcome and ii) mortality, symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) and procedural complications.

METHODS

We included consecutive patients with acute AIS-LVO and National Institute of Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score<8, treated by MT at Lille University Hospital. Recanalisation was graded according to modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (mTICI) score, mTICI 2b/2c/3 being considered successful. We recorded procedural complications and classified intra-cerebral hemorrhages (ICH) and sICH according with European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study (ECASS) and ECASS2 criteria. Three-month outcome was evaluated by modified Rankin scale (mRS). Excellent and favourable outcomes were respectively defined as mRS 0-1 and 0-2 (or similar to pre-stroke).

RESULTS

We included 95 patients. At three months, 56 patients (59. 0%) achieved an excellent outcome and 69 (72, 6%) a favourable outcome, both being more frequent in patients with successful recanalisation than in patients without (excellent outcome 71, 1% versus 10, 5%, P<0.001 and favourable outcome 82.9% versus 31.6%, P<0.001). The difference remained unchanged after adjustment for age and pre-MT infarct volume. Similar results were observed in patients with pre-MT NIHSS ≤5. Death occurred in five patients (5.3%), procedural complications in 12 (12.6%), any ICH in 38 (40.0%), including 3 (3.2%) sICH.

CONCLUSIONS

Achieving successful recanalisation appears beneficial and safe in acute AIS-LVO patients with NIHSS<8 before MT.

Outcomes after Thrombectomy for Minor Stroke: A Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

To determine the outcomes after mechanical thrombectomy (MT) versus medical management in patients with minor stroke symptomatology.

METHODS

A meta-analysis was performed for studies reporting outcomes after MT, either as stand-alone therapy or with intravenous thrombolysis in patients with minor stroke and large-vessel occlusion.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies with 2134 patients met the selection criteria and were included. Two studies compared immediate thrombectomy versus best medical management (with rescue thrombectomy) and the odds ratios of excellent outcomes, good outcomes, mortality and incidence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) after immediate thrombectomy versus best medical management were 1.07 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.93-1.22%), 1.15 (95% CI 1.05-1.25), 0.65 (95% CI 0.30-1.38), and 2.89 (95% CI 0.82-10.13), respectively. Among the 8 studies that compared MT outcomes versus medical management (without thrombectomy), odds ratios of excellent outcomes, good outcomes, mortality, and incidence of sICH after MT versus medical management were 0.98 (95% CI 0.89-1.07), 0.94 (95% CI 0.89-1.00), 1.61 (95% CI 1.08-2.41), and 2.59 (95% CI 1.35-4.96), respectively. Among all 14 studies, pooled proportions of excellent outcomes, good outcomes, mortality, and sICH after thrombectomy were 58.7%, 76.2%, 6.82%, and 3.23%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study shows significant selection bias and heterogeneity in the literature with differences in baseline characteristics (age, stroke severity, prestroke modified Rankin Scale score, side of infarct, vessel and site of occlusion, use of intravenous thrombolysis, criteria for clinical deterioration, and selection bias for rescue MT and rates of reperfusion), emphasizing the need for a randomized controlled trial.

Progression of stroke deficits in patients presenting with mild symptoms: The underlying etiology determines outcome

Background and purpose

Patients with acute stroke and mild or rapidly improving symptoms frequently show progression. The role of reperfusion treatment in such patients is not clear. We hypothesized that progression was most likely in patients with cortical localization and such patients may benefit from thrombolysis.

Material and methods

We interrogated Hamad Stroke Database to evaluate 90-days outcome in patients with acute ischemic stroke admitted within 4 hours and a NIHSS score of ≤6. Evaluation was based on localization (lacunar or cortical), multi-model imaging abnormalities and whether they received rt-PA. The 90-day mRS was used to determine outcome.

Results

During study period 6381 patients were admitted with acute stroke. Mild stroke within 4 hours was diagnosed in 506 [no thrombolysis: 381(lacunar: 213; cortical: 168), thrombolysis: 125 (lacunar: 45; cortical: 80)]. The rt-PA treated patients had significantly higher NIHSS (2.94±3.9 versus 1.28±2.46, p<0.0001), increased rates of complications (16.0% versus 3.9%, p<0.0001) and longer hospital stay (6.05±8.1 versus 3.78±3.6 days; p<0.001). In patients with cortical stroke, intracranial arterial occlusions (11.6% vs 3.9%, p<0.0001) and CTP mismatch (22.2% vs 4.4%, p<0.0001) were more frequent in rt-PA treated patients. Discharge mRS (33.6% versus 13.9%, p<0.001) and 90-days mRS (23.2% versus 11.8%, p = 0.002) was significantly worse in patients with cortical stroke (rt-PA-treated and untreated patients).

Conclusions

The outcome in patients with mild stroke depends on lesion location (lacunar versus cortical) and severity of symptoms. Patients who receive rt-PA have significantly larger deficits, increased imaging abnormalities and higher rates of hospital complication, explaining the poor outcome in such subjects.

Emergency management of stroke in the era of mechanical thrombectomy

Emergency management of stroke has been directed at the delivery of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) in a timely fashion. Because of the many limitations attached to the delivery of tPA and the perceived benefits accrued to tPA, its use has been limited. Mechanical thrombectomy, a far superior therapy for the largest and most disabling strokes, large vessel occlusions (LVOs), has changed the way acute strokes are managed. Aside from the rush to deliver tPA, there is now a need to identify LVO and refer those patients with LVO to physicians and facilities capable of delivering urgent thrombectomy. Other parts of emergency department management of stroke are directed at identifying and mitigating risk factors for future strokes and at preventing further damage from occurring. We review here the most recent literature supporting these advances in stroke care and present a framework for understanding the role that emergency physicians play in acute stroke care.

The Mild and Rapidly Improving Stroke Study (MaRISS): Rationale and design

Rationale

Although mild and rapidly improving stroke symptoms are the most common first stroke presentation, this group has been understudied in acute stroke trials. Observational and retrospective studies suggest residual disability in one third of patients.

Aims

To elucidate long-term outcomes of patients with mild and rapidly improving stroke, evaluate the predictors of outcome, and examine the association with alteplase treatment.

Sample size

The initial estimate of 2650 participants to detect a 9% difference in non-disabled 90-day outcomes between alteplase-treated and untreated participants was revised to 2000 after a pre-planned re-estimation based on actual treatment rates.

Methods and design

Prospective observational study of patients with mild ischemic stroke (NIHSS ≤ 5) or rapidly improving stroke symptoms evaluated within 4.5 h from onset.

Outcomes

The primary outcome is the proportion of patients with modified Rankin Scale (mRS) ≥ 2 at 90 days; the primary safety outcome is symptomatic hemorrhagic transformation within 36 h among those treated with alteplase. Secondary outcomes include the 90-day Barthel Index, Stroke Impact Scale 16, European Quality of Life scale, mRS at 30 days, and 30- and 90-day mortality.

Discussion

MaRISS will define outcomes and their predictors and clarify the effects of alteplase in patients with mild and rapidly improving stroke symptoms, providing clinicians with important information to manage this population.

Biomarkers for ischemic stroke subtypes: A protein-protein interaction analysis

According to the Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment, ischemic stroke is classified into five subtypes. However, the predictive biomarkers of ischemic stroke subtypes are still largely unknown. The utmost objective of this study is to map, construct and analyze protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks for all subtypes of ischemic stroke, and to suggest the predominant biological pathways for each subtypes. Through 6285 protein data retrieved from PolySearch2 and STRING database, the first PPI networks for all subtypes of ischemic stroke were constructed. Notably, F2 and PLG were identified as the critical proteins for large artery atherosclerosis (LAA), lacunar, cardioembolic, stroke of other determined etiology (SOE) and stroke of undetermined etiology (SUE). Gene ontology and DAVID analysis revealed that GO:0030193 regulation of blood coagulation and GO:0051917 regulation of fibrinolysis were the important functional clusters for all the subtypes. In addition, inflammatory pathway was the key etiology for LAA and lacunar, while FOS and JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathways might contribute to cardioembolic stroke. Due to many risk factors associated with SOE and SUE, the precise etiology for these two subtypes remained to be concluded.

Current Drug Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke: Challenges and Opportunities

Patient-level health outcomes for acute ischemic stroke have significantly improved in the last decade primarily because of superior overall case management, availability of tailored drug interventions, and advances in endovascular procedures. Nevertheless, disease registries show a "quality gap" across social determinants of health and between in-hospital and community-onset strokes. Several factors, including financing and infrastructure constraints, limited expertise, and clinical uncertainty, still prevent adherence to evidence-based clinical guidelines and optimal care pathways. This paper critically appraises existing evidence on the use of drug therapies in acute ischemic stroke, in an attempt to resolve physician-related subjective barriers for effective acute management of the disease. We conclude that intravenous administration of rt-PA (recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator, alteplase) is an essential component of acute-phase pharmacologic treatment and a driver for the improvement of overall ischemic stroke health outcomes. The safety profile of alteplase and similar treatments are well within the patient benefit zone of eligible patients when compared to non-treatment alternatives. Monomodal neuroprotective drugs with single or pleiotropic mechanisms of action have failed to support long-term sustainable results. Drugs with complex mechanisms of action that promote neurorecovery, such as cerebrolysin, are valid options for adjunctive treatment of acute ischemic stroke. Recent years have shown clear improvements in the methodology and design of clinical trials, with an increase in overall internal and external validity. A better understanding of study limitations has not hindered, but enhanced their potential to contribute, together with sometimes superior data sources, to health decision making.

Can people apply 'FAST' when it really matters? A qualitative study guided by the common sense self-regulation model

Background

Early identification of stroke symptoms and rapid access to the emergency services increases an individual’s chance of receiving thrombolytic therapy and reduces the likelihood of infirmity. The UK’s national stroke campaign ‘Act FAST’ was developed to increase public awareness of stroke symptoms and highlighted the importance of rapid response by contacting emergency services. No study to date has assessed if and how people who experienced or witnessed stroke in line with the campaigns’ symptoms of the FAST acronym (i.e., facial weakness, arm weakness, slurred speech, and time) may use this FAST in their response.

Methods

Semi-structured interviews with 13 stroke patients and witnesses were conducted. Interviews were theory-guided based on the Common Sense Self-Regulation Model, to understand the appraisal process of the onset of stroke symptoms and how this impacted on participants’ ability to apply their knowledge of the FAST campaign.

Results

The majority of patients (n = 8/13) failed to correctly identify stroke and reported no impact of the campaign on their stroke recognition and response. Inability to identify stroke, perceiving symptoms to lack severity and lack of control contributed to a delay in seeking medical attention.

Conclusion

Stroke witnesses and patients predominantly fail to identify stroke which suggest a lack of FAST application when it matters. Inaccurate risk perceptions and lack of physical control both play central roles in influencing the formation of illness representation not associated with an appropriate emergency response.

[Reperfusion therapy in patients with minor or mild ischemic stroke]

A significant number of patients with minor or mild stroke symptoms on initial presentation subsequently develop neurological deterioration and poor clinical outcomes at hospital discharge. The presence of an underlying large vessel occlusion is a strong predictor of both clinical worsening and poor outcome. Although patients with a low baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) could have been included in some randomized controlled trials, the benefits of the mechanical thrombectomy for patients with a low NIHSS score are unknown. The causes of neurological deterioration in patients with underlying large vessel occlusion are heterogeneous, but include collateral failure, and no straightforward mechanisms are found in the majority of cases. Patients with internal carotid artery occlusion, but with a patent middle cerebral artery (MCA), can occasionally have good collateral circulation and develop only minor or mild stroke. These patients exhibit collateral MCA flow via the circle of Willis despite ipsilateral internal carotid artery occlusion. However, thrombus migration may cause occlusion of collateral MCA flow, leading to dramatic neurological deterioration. Careful observation and detailed assessment are required for the management of these patients. Recent studies have examined the efficacy and optimal timing of thrombolysis or mechanical thrombectomy for patients with minor or mild stroke. Herein, we review the mechanisms of neurological deterioration, and the efficacy of reperfusion therapy, for patients with minor or mild stroke.

Astrocyte-specific deletion of Kir6.1/K-ATP channel aggravates cerebral ischemia/reperfusion injury through endoplasmic reticulum stress in mice

ATP-sensitive potassium (K-ATP) channels, coupling cell metabolism to cell membrane potential, are involved in brain diseases including stroke. Emerging evidence shows that astrocytes play important roles in the pathophysiology of cerebral ischemia. Kir6.1, a pore-forming subunit of K-ATP channel, is prominently expressed in astrocytes and participates in regulating its function. However, the exact role of astrocytic Kir6.1-containg K-ATP channel (Kir6.1/K-ATP) in ischemic stroke remains unclear. Here, we found that astrocytic Kir6.1 knockout (KO) mice exhibited larger infarct areas and more severe brain edema and neurological deficits in middle cerebral artery occlusion stroke model. Both activated gliosis and neuronal loss were aggravated in astrocytic Kir6.1 KO mice. Furthermore, the protein levels of pro-apoptotic protein Bcl-2 associated X (Bax) and active caspase-3 were up-regulated and the expression of anti-apoptotic protein Bcl-2 was down-regulated in astrocytic Kir6.1 KO mice. This is accompanied by enhanced endoplasmic reticulum stress (ER stress) responses in brain tissues and in astrocytes during ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury. Finally, inhibition of ER stress rescued astrocyte apoptosis induced by Kir6.1 deletion during I/R injury. Collectively, our findings reveal that astrocytic Kir6.1/K-ATP channel protects brain from cerebral ischemia/reperfusion injury through inhibiting ER stress and suggest that astrocytic Kir6.1/K-ATP channel is a promising therapeutic target for ischemic stroke.