Off-hour effect is not significant in endovascular treatment for anterior circulation large vessel occlusion in a multicentre registry

Outcomes of patients with acute ischemic stroke associated with large vessel occlusion admitted during regular and off-hours: a sub-analysis of the RESCUE-Japan Registry 2

BACKGROUND

Off-hour admissions can adversely affect clinical outcomes, though evidence in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) associated with large vessel occlusion (LVO) remains limited. This study aimed to examine the impact of off-hour versus regular-hour admissions on outcomes in patients with AIS associated with LVO.

METHODS

Data from the Recovery by Endovascular Salvage for Cerebral Ultra-Acute Embolism (RESCUE)-Japan Registry 2, a prospective multicenter registry of patients with AIS associated with LVO were used. Eligible patients were aged ≥20 years and admitted within 24 hours of stroke onset. Off-hour admissions were defined as those occurring between 17:00 and 09:00 on weekdays and at all times on holidays, reflecting typical periods of reduced healthcare staffing. The primary outcome was a modified Rankin Scale score of 0-2, assessed 90 days post-admission.

RESULTS

Of the 2390 patients, 1794 (71.7%) and 676 (28.3%) were admitted during off-hours and regular hours, respectively. Intravenous recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator was administered to 617 (36.0%) off-hour patients and 336 (49.7%) regular-hour patients (P<0.0001). Endovascular therapy was provided to 915 (53.4%) off-hour patients and 361 (53.4%) regular-hour patients (P=0.99). Favorable outcomes (mRS score 0-2) were observed in 604 (35.2%) off-hour patients and 272 (40.2%) regular-hour patients (P=0.02). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed no significant difference in the primary outcome between groups (adjusted OR 1.07; 95% CI 0.84 to 1.35; P=0.56).

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that off-hour and regular-hour admissions have similar clinical outcomes in patients with AIS associated with LVO in this Japanese cohort.

Delayed door to puncture time during off-duty hours is associated with unfavorable outcomes after mechanical thrombectomy in the early window of acute ischemic stroke

BACKGROUNDS

The impact of off-duty hours mechanical thrombectomy on outcomes remains a subject of controversy. The impacts of off-duty hours on procedures are influenced by various factors, but the most critical one is the time delay in initiating the procedure after the patient's arrival at the emergency room. Recently, a report suggested that the impact of time delay on post-procedural outcomes is evident in patients who arrive at the emergency room within 6 h of symptom onset, referred to as the "early window." We hypothesized that the impact of procedure delays on outcomes during off duty-hours would be most significant within this early window. This study aimed to investigate the impact of door-to-puncture time (DTPT) delays in patients who underwent mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) during off-duty hours in both the early and late time windows.

METHODS

We investigated patients who presented to the emergency center between 2014 and 2022. Among a total of 6,496 AIS patients, we selected those who underwent mechanical thrombectomy within 24 h of the onset of acute anterior circulation occlusion. The eligible patients were divided into two groups: those who arrived within 6 h of symptom onset and received the procedure within 8 h (early window), and those who received the procedure between 8 h and 24 h after symptom onset (late window). The study assessed the association between the onset to puncture time in each group and poor outcomes, measured by the modified Rankin scores(mRs) at 90 days. Furthermore, the study analyzed the impact of receiving the procedure during off-hours in both the early and late windows on outcomes. Specifically, the analysis focused on the impact of delayed DTPT in patients during off-duty hours on outcomes measured by the 90-days mRS.

RESULTS

Among the eligible patients, a total of 501 AIS patients underwent mechanical thrombectomy for acute anterior circulation occlusion within 24 h. Of these, 395 patients (78.8%) fell into the early window category, and 320 patients (63.9%) underwent the procedure during off-duty hours. In the early window, for every 60-minute increase in OTPT, the probability of occurrence a poor outcome at 90 days significantly increased in the fully adjusted model (OR = 1.21; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.43; p = 0.03). In the early window, delayed procedures during off-duty hours (exceeding 103 min of DTPT) were identified as an independent predictor of poor outcomes (OR = 1.85; 95% CI, 1.05 to 3.24; p = 0.03). However, in the late window, there was no association between DTPT and outcomes at 90 days, and the impact of DTPT delays during off-hours was not observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Through this study, it became evident that the impacts of off-duty hours in mechanical thrombectomy were most pronounced in the early window, where the impact of time delay was clear. Therefore, it is believed that improvements in the treatment system are necessary to address this issue.

Sex Differences in Outcomes after Endovascular Thrombectomy for Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke

INTRODUCTION

Endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is the standard of care for patients with large-vessel occlusion acute ischemic stroke (AIS). There may be differing recanalization effectiveness based on patients' sex, and understanding such variations can improve patient outcomes by adjusting for differences. We aimed to assess the sex differences in outcome after EVT for patients with AIS.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 250 consecutive AIS patients who underwent EVT from July 2019 to February 2022 across two large comprehensive tertiary care stroke centers in China. Outcomes of male patients were compared to females, where poor outcome was defined as a modified Rankin score (mRS) of 3-6 at 90 days.

RESULTS

Male patients had higher rates of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) (12.50% vs. 4.05%, p = 0.042) and higher hospitalization costs (114,541.08 vs. 105,790.27 RMB, p = 0.024). Male patients also had a longer median onset-to-needle time (ONT) (146.00 [104.00, 202.00] versus 120.00 [99.25, 144.75], p = 0.026). However, there were no differences in hospitalization length (p = 0.251), 90-day favorable outcome (p = 0.952), and 90-day mortality (p = 0.931) between the sexes.

CONCLUSION

Female patients had lower hospitalization costs and sICH rates than males after EVT for AIS. Identifying such differences and implementing measures, including adaptations to workflow optimization, would help to reduce the ONT and last known normal-to-puncture time seen in males to improve patient outcomes. Despite such variations, favorable outcomes and mortality are similar in female and male AIS patients.

Impact of Off-Hour Admission on In-Hospital Outcomes for Patients With Stroke Receiving Reperfusion Therapy in China

BACKGROUND

The structure and staffing of hospitals greatly impact patient outcomes, with frequent changes occurring during nights and weekends. This retrospective cohort study assessed the impact of admission timing on in-hospital management and outcomes for patients with stroke receiving reperfusion therapy in China using data from a nationwide registry.

METHODS

Data from patients receiving reperfusion therapy were extracted from the Chinese Stroke Center Alliance. Hospital admission time was categorized according to day/evening versus night and weekday versus weekend. Primary outcomes were in-hospital death or discharge against medical advice, hemorrhage transformation, early neurological deterioration, and major adverse cardiovascular events. Logistic regression was performed to compare in-hospital management performance and outcomes based on admission time categories.

RESULTS

Overall, 42 381 patients received recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (r-tPA) therapy, and 5224 underwent endovascular treatment (EVT). Patients admitted during nighttime had a higher probability of receiving r-tPA therapy within 4.5 hours from onset or undergoing EVT within 6 hours from onset compared with those admitted during day/evening hours (adjusted odds ratio, 1.04 [95% CI, 1.01-1.08]; P=0.021; adjusted odds ratio, 1.72 [95% CI, 1.59-1.86]; P<0.001, respectively). However, no significant difference was observed between weekend and weekday admissions for either treatment. No notable differences were noted between weekends and weekdays or nighttime and daytime periods in door-to-needle time for r-tPA or door-to-puncture time for EVT initiation. Furthermore, weekend or nighttime admission did not have a significant effect on the primary outcomes of r-tPA therapy or EVT. Nevertheless, in patients undergoing EVT, a higher incidence of pneumonia was observed among those admitted at night compared with those admitted during day/evening hours (adjusted odds ratio, 1.22 [95% CI, 1.05-1.42]; P=0.011).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients admitted at nighttime were more likely to receive r-tPA therapy or EVT within the time window recommended in the guidelines. However, patients receiving EVT admitted at night had an increased risk of pneumonia.

Weekend Admission and Mortality in Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury: A Meta-analysis

Objective

Previous studies have reported the presence of a "weekend effect" with respect to mortality in serious emergency admissions, including cases of traumatic brain injury (TBI). However, the relationship between weekend hospitalization and TBI mortality has not been fully established. This study aimed to conduct a systematic review of available evidence and investigate differences in mortality among TBI patients between weekday and weekend admissions.

Methods

Electronic databases including PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase were used to obtain relevant articles. Mortality, as the primary outcome of interest, encompassed in-hospital or 30-day mortality. Mortality rates were compared between the 2 groups, weekend and weekday admissions. Additionally, meta-regression analysis was performed on potential confounders to verify and provide comparative results.

Results

A total of 7 studies involving 522,942 TBI patients were eligible for inclusion in the synthesis of the systematic review. Of these patients, 71.6% were admitted during weekdays, whereas 28.4% were hospitalized on weekends. The overall integrated mortality was 11.0% (57,286/522,942), with a mortality rate of 10.8% in the weekday group and 11.3% in the weekend group. Pooled analysis revealed no significant difference in mortality between the weekday and weekend groups (risk ratio, 0.99; 95% confidence interval, 0.90-1.09; p=0.78). Furthermore, the meta-regression analysis for sensitivity assessment showed no modifying effect on mortality (p=0.79).

Conclusion

This study found no difference in mortality rates between weekday and weekend admissions among TBI patients. Additional sensitivity analyses also demonstrated no significant increase in the risk of mortality in the weekend group.

The impact of off-hour mechanical thrombectomy therapy on outcomes for acute ischemic stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The impact of off-hours and on-hours mechanical thrombectomy (MT) treatment for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is not well understood. We conducted a systematic review and met-analysis comparing outcomes between patients undergoing off-hours MT versus on-hours MT.

METHODS

This study is reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses recommendations. A systematic literature review of the English language literature was conducted using Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, and PubMed databases. We included all original studies comparing off-hour and on-hour outcomes or time metrics in AIS undergoing MT. R software version 4.3.1 and the 'meta' statistical package were used to analyze all the data presented in this study.

RESULTS

We included 26 studies with 82,850 patients. Patients undergoing MT during off-hours achieved lower rates of 90-day functional independence (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.86-0.99; p = 0.04) and successful recanalization (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.81-0.98; p = 0.014). Patients undergoing off-hours MT experienced similar rates of 90-day mortality (OR 1.07, 95% CI 0.96-1.19; p = 0.21) and sICH (OR 1.04, 95% CI 0.85-1.28; p = 0.674). Patients in the off-hour group experienced longer onset to door time (MD = 12.23 min; 95% CI 4.53-19.93; p = 0.002), imaging to puncture time (MD = 10.59 min; 95% CI 4.00-17.19; p = 0.002), and door to recanalization time (MD = 13.31 min; 95% CI 4.60-22.03; p = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing MT for AIS during off-hours experienced lower rates of functional independence. This may be attributed to treatment delays during off-hours. Future studies should work to optimize hospital workflows and identify factors which may contribute to treatment delays.

Effect of weekend versus weekday admission on the mortality of acute ischemic stroke patients in China: an analysis of data from the Chinese acute ischemic stroke treatment outcome registry

Background

Due to disparities in medical resources in rural and urban areas as well as in different geographic regions in China, the effect of weekend versus weekday admission on the outcomes of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients is unknown. Our aim was to investigate whether the outcomes of AIS patients differ according to the day of admission in China.

Methods

The data were extracted from the Chinese Acute Ischemic Stroke Treatment Outcome Registry (CASTOR), a multicenter prospective study database of patients diagnosed with AIS. The chi-square test (χ²) and logistic regression were used to assess mortality for weekday and weekend admissions among AIS patients stratified by rural or urban status and geographic region (including the eastern, northeastern, central, and western regions).

Results

In total, 9,256 patients were included in this study. Of these patients, 57.2% were classified as urban, and 42.8% were classified as rural. A total of 6,760 (73%) patients were admitted on weekdays, and 2,496 (27%) were admitted on weekends. There was no significant difference in the mortality rate among patients admitted on weekends compared with those admitted on weekdays in urban (7.5% versus 7.4%) or rural areas (8.8% versus 8.1%; p > 0.05). The mortality rate was the highest among patients admitted on weekends and weekdays (11.6% versus 10.3%) in the northeastern area, without statistical significance before and after adjusting for the patients' background characteristics (p > 0.05). In addition, regression analysis revealed that the mortality of patients admitted on weekdays was more likely to be influenced by regional subgroup, hospital level and intravenous thrombolysis than that of patients admitted on weekends.

Conclusion

The weekend effect was not observed in the mortality of patients with AIS regardless of rural-urban status or geographic region in China.