Rapid effect of inhaled steroids on nocturnal worsening of asthma

Effects of mometasone furoate administered via a dry powder inhaler once daily in the evening on nocturnal lung function and sleep parameters in patients with moderate persistent asthma: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Nocturnal symptoms are common in asthma patients and have the potential for considerable clinical effects due to a lack of sleep and persistent daytime symptoms of somnolence and activity impairment. The primary objective of this investigation was to determine the effect of a 14-day course of once-daily evening administration of mometasone furoate 400 microg administered via a dry powder inhaler (MF-DPI 400 microg qd pm) on the overnight decline in pulmonary function observed in patients with nocturnal asthma.

METHODS

Eligible enrollees were between the ages of 18 and 60 years and had established mild to moderate asthma, with an improvement in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)) of >15% after administration of inhaled salbutamol (albuterol) 200 microg. All enrolled patients had a history of nocturnal asthma. Enrollees were randomized to receive MF-DPI 400 microg qd pm or placebo administered between 6 pm and 8 pm for 14 days. The primary outcome evaluated in the study was reduction in nocturnal decline in evening (8 pm) to morning (6 am) FEV(1) values. Secondary outcomes included reduction in nocturnal decline in evening to morning peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR), polysomnographic indices of sleep, and psychometric indices (Nocturnal Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire [NRQLQ], 36-item Short Form of the Medical Outcomes Survey [SF-36], and Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire [AQLQ]).

RESULTS

A total of 20 patients were randomized and completed all phases of the study. No significant differences were observed between treatment groups in the primary outcome of nocturnal decline in FEV(1) from pretreatment to end of treatment. Likewise, there was no significant difference between treatment groups in polysomnographic indices of sleep or quality-of-life assessments. However, there was a trend toward improvement in the activity scale of the AQLQ assessment in the MF-DPI 400 microg qd pm treatment group.

CONCLUSION

No significant treatment effect on nocturnal pulmonary function, sleep indices or quality of life was observed with 14-day administration of MF-DPI 400 microg qd pm. These findings are limited by the small sample size and the short treatment period evaluated. Future studies are warranted to study the effects of MF-DPI therapy in patients with nocturnal asthma.

Glucocorticoids inhibit degranulation of mast cells in allergic asthma via nongenomic mechanism

BACKGROUND

Glucocorticoids (GCs) are the most potent anti-inflammatory agents available for allergic diseases including asthma, which are routinely believed to need several hours to take effect through regulating gene expression. Our previous report had shown that GCs could inhibit allergic asthma within 10 min, which the classical mechanism could not explain.

OBJECTIVE

To confirm the existence and verify the sites of GCs' rapid action, we investigated nongenomic effects of GCs on degranulation of mast cells in allergic asthma.

METHODS

The GCs' rapid action on airway mast cells deregulations was evaluated in the allergic asthma model of guinea pigs by the computer-assisted morphometry. Using whole-cell patch clamp and fluorometric assay, we examined GCs' nongenomic effect on IgE-mediated exocytosis and histamine release of rat basophilic leukaemia-2H3 mast cells. Employing the flash photolysis technique, we studied the role of Ca(2+) signal in the GCs' nongenomic effect.

RESULTS

Inhaled GCs significantly inhibited airway mast cells degranulation in the allergic asthma model of guinea pigs within 10 min. In vitro, GCs could rapidly inhibit IgE-mediated exocytosis and histamine release of mast cells, and neither GC nuclear receptor antagonist nor protein synthesis inhibitor could block the rapid action. We further demonstrated that GCs' nongenomic effect was not through direct action on secretory machinery, but was mediated by a reduction in the [Ca(2+)](i) elevation.

CONCLUSIONS

The study suggested for the first time that nongenomic pathway was involved in GCs' rapid inhibition on allergic asthma, and raised the possibility of new therapeutic strategies for allergic diseases including asthma.

Comparison of single 2000-microg dose treatment vs. sequential repeated-dose 500-microg treatments with nebulized budesonide in acute asthma exacerbations

BACKGROUND

High repeated doses of inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) are recognized as having a more rapid improvement of outcomes than a single dose of ICS in severe acute asthma. However, to our knowledge, there has been no direct comparison of the early effects of single or repeated administration of the same total dosage of ICS in children with moderate to severe exacerbations of asthma.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of a single dose of 2000 microg of nebulized budesonide with 4 repeated doses of 500 microg of nebulized budesonide in 40 children with an acute asthma exacerbation.

METHODS

Randomized, double-blind, parallel study that compared the efficacy of 2000 microg of nebulized budesonide, administered in a single dose, with repeated doses (4 doses of 500 microg each) during the first 90 minutes in 40 children (mean [SD] age, 10.7 [2.4] years) with an acute asthma exacerbation that required treatment with an oral corticosteroid. Forced expiratory volume in 1 second, asthma attack score, and oxygen saturation were evaluated at 20, 40, 60, 90, 120, 180, and 240 minutes after initial treatment. Oral corticosteroids were given to all patients at 90 minutes.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (P = .54) at any times between the groups. Also, asthma scores and oxygen saturation were not different in either group within 90 minutes (P = .51 and P = .64, respectively) and thereafter (P = .35 and P = .87, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The use of a single dose of nebulized budesonide is as effective as repeated administration of the same total dosage during the first 90 minutes before giving oral corticosteroids in children with moderate to severe exacerbations of asthma.

Evidence-based selection of inhaled corticosteroid for treatment of chronic asthma

Published literature relevant to comparison of various inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) was reviewed. Marked heterogeneity was found in the reported results. The efficacy and side effects of ICSs depend on their formulation, dosing and device used, and the subjects' age, severity of asthma, and inhaler technique. All these factors have not been included uniformly in most study designs. Notwithstanding this limitation, it appears that fluticasone is generally very effective and safe in low-to-medium doses and may be used for most patients. Budesonide is the only Pregnancy Category B ICSs, all others being Category C, and it is available as nebulizer suspension suitable for use in children over 6 months of age. Budesonide, also available as dry powder inhaler, and beclomethasone, available as metered-dose inhaler, are equal in efficacy, and side effects and may be chosen according to the patient's ability to handle the device. Flunisolide causes fewer side effects but is also relatively less effective. Triamcinolone is generally less effective and causes more side effects than most of the other ICSs. Mometasone may be preferred if once-daily dosing is desired. Ciclesonide has been found highly effective in once-daily dose and without side effects even in high doses. Further studies comparing it with other ICSs over longer periods of use will determine its place in treatment of chronic asthma.

Comparison of 4 AM and 4 PM bronchial responsiveness to hypertonic saline in asthma

Bronchial responsiveness to methacholine or histamine increases at night and may contribute to the mechanisms of nocturnal asthma. Hypertonic saline (HS) is a more clinically relevant stimulus for the diagnosis and assessment of the severity of asthma, but the circadian variation in bronchial responsiveness to hypertonic challenges has not been addressed. The aim of this study was to compare the responsiveness to hypertonic saline at 4:00 AM and at 4:00 PM. Eighteen diurnally active patients (11 women) with asthma, 31 +/- 9 years of age (mean +/- SD) and with a forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)) of 79.11% +/- 12.85%, underwent two challenge tests (4:00 AM and 4:00 PM) in random sequence separated by an interval of 7 days. The challenge test consisted of inhalations of 4.5% saline with increasing doses by doubling the duration of nebulization (0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 min). The inhalation continued until a drop of 20% in FEV(1) was achieved or total time of 15.5 min. The provocative dose that caused the 20% drop in FEV(1) (PD(20)) was calculated. Differences were found between 4:00 PM and 4:00 AM values for inhalation times [3.80 +/- 3.57 min and 2.19 +/- 2.42 min (p = 0.001), respectively] and for PD(20) [4.94 +/- 6.77 ml and 2.93 +/- 4.74 ml (p = 0.002), respectively]. Eight patients with a home-assessed nocturnal peak expiratory flow (PEF) drop of more than 15% formed the nocturnal asthma group. The behavior of these patients was similar to that of the non-nocturnal asthma group. We conclude that the bronchial responsiveness to HS increases at night.

Fluticasone versus HFA-beclomethasone dipropionate for chronic asthma in adults and children

BACKGROUND

The relative efficacy of fluticasone (FP) and beclomethasone (BDP) propelled with CFCs has been well established. The potency of HFA-BDP is thought to have been improved with new propellant and some studies suggest that it may equipotent at half the dose of CFC propelled-BDP. There is a need to revisit this question in the light of a potentially more potent new non-CFC propellant.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the relative efficacy of FP and HFA-propelled BDP in chronic asthma.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The Cochrane Airways Group Specialised Register was searched using pre-specified terms. Searches were current as of January 2006.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials were eligible for inclusion in the review. We compared either CFC or HFA-propelled FP with HFA-propelled BDP. We made a distinction between HFA-BDP and HFA-BDP extra fine, which dispenses smaller particles of drug, leading to different, usually more peripheral distribution in the airways. Any inhaler device was considered, and there was no restriction on studies with or without spacers. We included studies which assessed HFA-BDP given via either pMDI, breath-actuated MDI, or DPI.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently assessed studies for inclusion in the review. Data were extracted and entered in to RevMan 4.2 using standard meta-analytical techniques with predefined criteria for exploring statistical heterogeneity.

MAIN RESULTS

Eight studies (1260 participants) met the inclusion criteria of the review. One study was conducted in children. Study reporting quality was fair, but all studies were of short duration (three to twelve weeks). Only studies assessing HFA-BDP extra fine in comparison with FP were identified. Lung function was not significantly different between extra fine BDP and FP when compared at the same dose in parallel studies, change in FEV1: 0.04 litres (95% CI -0.03 to 0.11 litres; three studies, 659 adults); change in am PEF: -0.69 litres (95% CI -11.21 to 9.83 litres; two studies, 364 adults). Individual studies reported non-significant findings in symptom scores and quality of life questionnaires. There was no significant difference between FP and HFA-BDP in the risk of study withdrawal, dysphonia or when data were reported as any adverse event.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There was no significant difference between FP and extra fine HFA-BDP on FEV(1) or peak flow at a dose ratio of 1:1. However, the number of studies and width of the confidence intervals in the analyses do not exclude a clinically meaningful difference between these two drugs. Difficulty in the successful manipulation of the devices studied may be a barrier to the widespread use of MDIs. One paediatric study was included in the review, so extrapolation of the findings of this review to children is limited. Further longer term studies in adults and children with moderate and severe asthma are required.

Fluticasone versus HFA-beclomethasone dipropionate for chronic asthma in adults and children

BACKGROUND

The relative efficacy of fluticasone (FP) and beclomethasone (BDP) propelled with CFCs has been well established. The potency of HFA-BDP is thought to have been improved with new propellant and some studies suggest that it may equipotent at half the dose of CFC propelled-BDP. There is a need to revisit this question in the light of a potentially more potent new non-CFC propellant.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the relative efficacy of FP and HFA-propelled BDP in chronic asthma.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The Cochrane Airways Group Specialised Register was searched using pre-specified terms. Searches were current as of March 2005.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials were eligible for inclusion in the review. We compared either CFC or HFA-propelled FP with HFA-propelled BDP. We made a distinction between HFA-BDP and HFA-BDP extra fine, which dispenses smaller particles of drug, leading to different, usually more peripheral distribution in the airways. Any inhaler device was considered, and there was no restriction on studies with or without spacers. We included studies which assessed HFA-BDP given via either pMDI, breath-actuated MDI, or DPI.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently assessed studies for inclusion in the review. Data were extracted and entered in to RevMan 4.2 using standard meta-analytical techniques with predefined criteria for exploring statistical heterogeneity.

MAIN RESULTS

Seven studies (1230 participants) met the inclusion criteria of the review. One study was conducted in children. Study reporting quality was fair, but all studies were of short duration (three to twelve weeks). Only studies assessing HFA-BDP extra fine in comparison with FP were identified. Lung function was not significantly different between extra fine BDP and FP when compared at the same dose in parallel studies, change in FEV1: 0.04 litres (95% CI -0.03 to 0.11 litres; three studies, 659 adults); change in am PEF: -0.69 litres (95% CI -11.21 to 9.83 litres; two studies, 364 adults). Individual studies reported non-significant findings in symptom scores and quality of life questionnaires. There was no significant difference between FP and HFA-BDP in the risk of study withdrawal, dysphonia or when data were reported as any adverse event.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There was no significant difference between FP and extra fine HFA-BDP on FEV(1) or peak flow at a dose ratio of 1:1. However, the number of studies and width of the confidence intervals in the analyses do not exclude a clinically meaningful difference between these two drugs. Difficulty in the successful manipulation of the devices studied may be a barrier to the widespread use of MDIs. One paediatric study was included in the review, so extrapolation of the findings of this review to children is limited. Further longer term studies in adults and children with moderate and severe asthma are required.