Echocardiographic changes with non-invasive ventilation and CPAP in obesity hypoventilation syndrome

Relationship between obstructive sleep apnea and pulmonary hypertension: past, present and future

INTRODUCTION

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a widely prevalent condition with consequent multiple organ systems complications. There is consensus that OSA is associated with negative effects on pulmonary hemodynamics but whether it contributes to development of clinical pulmonary hypertension (PH) is unclear.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, we (1) highlight previous studies looking into the possible bidirectional association of OSA and PH, focusing on those that explore clinical prognostic implications, (2) explore potential pathophysiology, (3) discuss the new metrics in OSA, (4) describe endo-phenotyping of OSA, (5) recommend possible risk assessment and screening pathways.

EXPERT OPINION

Relying only on symptoms to consider a sleep study in PH patients is a missed opportunity to detect OSA, which, if present and not treated, can worsen outcomes. The potential prognostic role of sleep study metrics such as oxygen desaturation index (ODI), hypoxic burden (HB) and ventilatory burden (VB) in OSA should be studied in prospective trials to identify patients at risk for PH. AHI alone has not provided clarity. In those with PH, we should consider replacing ambulatory overnight pulse oximetry (OPO) with home sleep studies (HST). In PH patients, mild OSA should be sufficient to consider PAP therapy.

International Consensus Statement on Obstructive Sleep Apnea

BACKGROUND

Evaluation and interpretation of the literature on obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) allows for consolidation and determination of the key factors important for clinical management of the adult OSA patient. Toward this goal, an international collaborative of multidisciplinary experts in sleep apnea evaluation and treatment have produced the International Consensus statement on Obstructive Sleep Apnea (ICS:OSA).

METHODS

Using previously defined methodology, focal topics in OSA were assigned as literature review (LR), evidence-based review (EBR), or evidence-based review with recommendations (EBR-R) formats. Each topic incorporated the available and relevant evidence which was summarized and graded on study quality. Each topic and section underwent iterative review and the ICS:OSA was created and reviewed by all authors for consensus.

RESULTS

The ICS:OSA addresses OSA syndrome definitions, pathophysiology, epidemiology, risk factors for disease, screening methods, diagnostic testing types, multiple treatment modalities, and effects of OSA treatment on multiple OSA-associated comorbidities. Specific focus on outcomes with positive airway pressure (PAP) and surgical treatments were evaluated.

CONCLUSION

This review of the literature consolidates the available knowledge and identifies the limitations of the current evidence on OSA. This effort aims to create a resource for OSA evidence-based practice and identify future research needs. Knowledge gaps and research opportunities include improving the metrics of OSA disease, determining the optimal OSA screening paradigms, developing strategies for PAP adherence and longitudinal care, enhancing selection of PAP alternatives and surgery, understanding health risk outcomes, and translating evidence into individualized approaches to therapy.

Domiciliary noninvasive ventilation for chronic respiratory diseases

Patients with chronic respiratory diseases, including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), neuromuscular diseases, kyphoscoliosis and obstructive sleep apnoea-obesity hypoventilation syndrome (OSA-OHS), are at a higher risk of decompensation in the form of hypercapnic respiratory failure leading to intensive care unit (ICU) admission and increased mortality. This article reviews the evidence of role of domiciliary noninvasive ventilation (NIV) in patients with diseases with chronic ventilatory failure, including the mechanism of the effect of (NIV).

Cardiac surgery in the morbidly obese

BACKGROUND

Obesity rates globally continue to rise and in turn the body mass index (BMI) of patients undergoing cardiac surgery is set to mirror this. Patients who are Class III obese (BMI ≥ 40) pose significant challenges to the surgical teams responsible for their care and are also at high risk of complications from surgery and even death. To improve outcomes in this population, interventions carried out in the preoperative, operative, and postoperative periods have shown promise. Despite this, there are no defined best practice national guidelines for perioperative management of obese patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

AIM

This review is aimed at clinicians and researchers in the field of cardiac surgery and aims to form a basis for the future development of clinical guidelines for the management of obese cardiac surgery patients.

METHODS

The PubMed database was utilized to identify relevant literature and strategies employed at various stages of the surgical journey were analyzed.

CONCLUSIONS

Data presented identified the benefits of preoperative respiratory muscle training, off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting where possible, and early extubation. Further randomized controlled trials are required to identify optimal operative and perioperative management strategies before the introduction of such guidance into clinical practice.

Effectiveness of CPAP vs. Noninvasive Ventilation Based on Disease Severity in Obesity Hypoventilation Syndrome and Concomitant Severe Obstructive Sleep Apnea

RATIONALE

Obesity hypoventilation syndrome (OHS) with concomitant severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is treated with CPAP or noninvasive ventilation (NIV) during sleep. NIV is costlier, but may be advantageous because it provides ventilatory support. However, there are no long-term trials comparing these treatment modalities based on OHS severity.

OBJECTIVE

To determine if CPAP have similar effectiveness when compared to NIV according to OHS severity subgroups.

METHODS

Post hoc analysis of the Pickwick randomized clinical trial in which 215 ambulatory patients with untreated OHS and concomitant severe OSA, defined as apnoea-hypopnea index (AHI)≥30events/h, were allocated to NIV or CPAP. In the present analysis, the Pickwick cohort was divided in severity subgroups based on the degree of baseline daytime hypercapnia (PaCO₂ of 45-49.9 or ≥50mmHg). Repeated measures of PaCO₂ and PaO₂ during the subsequent 3 years were compared between CPAP and NIV in the two severity subgroups. Statistical analysis was performed using linear mixed-effects model.

RESULTS

204 patients, 97 in the NIV group and 107 in the CPAP group were analyzed. The longitudinal improvements of PaCO₂ and PaO₂ were similar between CPAP and NIV based on the PaCO₂ severity subgroups.

CONCLUSION

In ambulatory patients with OHS and concomitant severe OSA who were treated with NIV or CPAP, long-term NIV therapy was similar to CPAP in improving awake hypercapnia, regardless of the severity of baseline hypercapnia. Therefore, in this patient population, the decision to prescribe CPAP or NIV cannot be solely based on the presenting level of PaCO₂.

Treatment of Sleep Apnea with Positive Airway Pressure and Its Association with Diastolic Dysfunction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

This meta-analysis assessed the effect of long-term (>6 weeks) noninvasive positive airway pressure (PAP) on diastolic function in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA).

METHODS

We searched the databases for randomized clinical trials including Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and EBSCO CINAHL from inception up to December 20, 2019. The search was not restricted to time, publication status, or language. Two independent investigators screened the studies and extracted the data, in duplicate. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane collaboration tools.

RESULTS

A total of 2,753 abstracts were resulted from literature search. A total of 9 randomized clinical trials assessing the effect of long-term (>6 weeks) PAP on diastolic function in patients with OSA including 833 participants were included. The following echo parameters were found in treated patients: a decrease in deceleration time (-39.49 ms CI [-57.24, -21.74]; p = 0.000), isovolumic relaxation time (-9.32 ms CI [-17.08, -1.57]; p = 0.02), and the ratio of early mitral inflow velocity to mitral annular early diastolic velocity (-1.38 CI [-2.6, -0.16]; p = 0.03). However, changes in left-atrial volume index and the ratio of early to late mitral inflow velocities were not statistically different. The risk of bias was mild to moderate among the studies.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that chronic treatment of moderate to severe OSA with noninvasive PAP is associated with improvement in echocardiographic findings of diastolic dysfunction.

Risk factors associated with pulmonary hypertension in obesity hypoventilation syndrome

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is prevalent in obesity hypoventilation syndrome (OHS). However, there is a paucity of data assessing pathogenic factors associated with PH. Our objective is to assess risk factors that may be involved in the pathogenesis of PH in untreated OHS.

METHODS

In a post-hoc analysis of the Pickwick trial, we performed a bivariate analysis of baseline characteristics between patients with and without PH. Variables with a p value ≤0.10 were defined as potential risk factors and were grouped by theoretical pathogenic mechanisms in several adjusted models. Similar analysis was carried out for the two OHS phenotypes, with and without severe concomitant obstructive sleep apnea (OSA).

RESULTS

Of 246 patients with OHS, 122 (50%) had echocardiographic evidence of PH defined as systolic pulmonary artery pressure ≥40 mmHg. Lower levels of awake PaO₂ and higher body mass index (BMI) were independent risk factors in the multivariate model, with a negative and positive adjusted linear association, respectively (adjusted odds ratio 0.96; 95% CI 0.93 to 0.98; p = 0.003 for PaO₂, and 1.07; 95% CI 1.03 to 1.12; p = 0.001 for BMI). In separate analyses, BMI and PaO₂ were independent risk factors in the severe OSA phenotype, whereas BMI and peak in-flow velocity in early (E)/late diastole (A) ratio were independent risk factors in the non-severe OSA phenotype.

CONCLUSIONS

This study identifies obesity per se as a major independent risk factor for PH, regardless of OHS phenotype. Therapeutic interventions targeting weight loss may play a critical role in improving PH in this patient population.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION

Registry: Clinicaltrial.gov; Identifier: NCT01405976.

Sleep-Disordered Breathing and Cardiovascular Disease in Children and Adolescents: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a known risk factor for cardiovascular disease in adults. It is associated with incident systemic hypertension, arrhythmia, stroke, coronary artery disease, and heart failure. OSA is common in children and adolescents, but there has been less focus on OSA as a primary risk factor for cardiovascular disease in children and adolescents. This scientific statement summarizes what is known regarding the impact of sleep‐disordered breathing and, in particular, OSA on the cardiovascular health of children and adolescents. This statement highlights what is known regarding the impact of OSA on the risk for hypertension, arrhythmia, abnormal ventricular morphology, impaired ventricular contractility, and elevated right heart pressure among children and adolescents. This scientific statement also summarizes current best practices for the diagnosis and evaluation of cardiovascular disease–related complications of OSA in children and adolescents with sleep apnea and highlights potential future research in the area of sleep‐disordered breathing and cardiovascular health during childhood and adolescence.

Cardiovascular disease in obesity hypoventilation syndrome - A review of potential mechanisms and effects of therapy

Cardiovascular disease is common in patients with obesity hypoventilation syndrome (OHS) and accounts in part for their poor prognosis. This narrative review article examines the epidemiology of cardiovascular disease in obesity hypoventilation syndrome, explores possible contributing factors and the effects of therapy. All studies that included cardiovascular outcomes and biomarkers were included. Overall, there is a higher burden of cardiovascular disease and cardiovascular risk factors among patients with obesity hypoventilation syndrome. In addition to obesity and sleep-disordered breathing, there are several other pathophysiological mechanisms that contribute to higher cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in OHS. There is evidence emerging that positive airway pressure therapy and weight loss have beneficial effects on the cardiovascular system in obesity hypoventilation syndrome patients, but further research is needed to clarify whether this translates to clinically important outcomes.

The association between sleep-related breathing disorders and pre-capillary pulmonary hypertension: A chicken and egg question

The level of knowledge about a direct link between sleep-related breathing disorders and pre-capillary pulmonary hypertension (PH) is low and there is a chicken and egg question to know which disease causes the other. On one hand, sleep-related breathing disorders are considered as a cause of group 3 PH, in the subgroup of patients with hypoxemia without lung disease. Indeed, isolated sleep-related breathing disorders can lead to mild pre-capillary PH on their own, although this is rare for obstructive sleep apnea and difficult to establish for obesity-hypoventilation syndrome, the evolution towards PH being observed especially in the presence of respiratory comorbidities. The hemodynamic improvement under treatment with continuous positive airway pressure or non-invasive ventilation also argues for a causal link between pre-capillary PH and sleep-related breathing disorders. On the other hand, patients followed for pre-capillary PH, particularly pulmonary arterial hypertension and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension, develop more sleep-related breathing disorders than the general population, especially sleep hypoxemia, central sleep apnea in patients with severe PH and obstructive sleep apnea in older patients with higher body mass index. The main objective of this article is therefore to answer two main questions, which will then lead us to discuss the bilateral link between these diseases: are sleep-related breathing disorders independent risk factors for pre-capillary PH and does pre-capillary PH induce sleep-related breathing disorders? In other words, who is the chicken and who is the egg?

Targeting subclinical organ damage in obstructive sleep apnea: a narrative review

Subclinical abnormalities in cardiac and vascular structure reflect the adverse effects triggered by a variety of risk factors on the cardiovascular (CV) system thereby representing an intermediate step in the cardiovascular continuum; such alterations are recognized as reliable markers of increased cardiovascular risk in different clinical settings including obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). The mechanisms underlying subclinical organ damage (OD) in the OSA setting are multifactorial. Hypoxemia and hypercapnia, induced by repeated collapses of upper airways, have been suggested to trigger a cascade of events such as activation of the sympathetic tone, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system leading to endothelial dysfunction, vasoconstriction, myocardial and vascular remodeling, and hypertension. Furthermore, coexisting non-haemodynamic alterations such as increased oxidative stress, release of inflammatory substances, enhanced lipolysis and insulin resistance have been reported to play a role in the pathogenesis of both cardiac and extra-cardiac OD. In this article we reviewed available evidence on the association between OSA and subclinical cardiac (i.e., left and right ventricular hypertrophy, left atrial dilatation) and extra-cardiac organ damage (i.e., carotid atherosclerosis, arterial stiffness, microvascular retinal changes, and microalbuminuria). This association is apparently stronger for cardiac and carotid subclinical damage than for other markers (i.e., arterial stiffness and retinal changes) and mostly evident in the setting of severe OSA.

Hypoxemia and pulmonary hypertension in patients with concomitant restrictive ventilatory defect and sleep apnea: the overlap syndrome

BACKGROUND

To investigate the severity of hypoxemia and prevalence of pulmonary hypertension (PHTN) in patients with the overlap syndrome (OS) of restrictive ventilatory defect (RVD) and sleep apnea (SA).

METHODS

Patients referred for both sleep test and spirometry for suspected SA and ventilatory disorders were recruited prospectively from January 2019 to January 2020. SA was determined by an apnea-hypopnea index ≥ 5/h; average oxygen saturation during sleep (meanSaO₂) and percentage of total sleep time with saturation < 90% (T90) were calculated. RVD was diagnosed in the presence of forced expiratory volume in the first second/forced vital capacity (FVC) > 0.7 and FVC < 80% predicted value. PHTN was defined by tricuspid regurgitation peak velocity ≥ 3.4 m/s, documented by noninvasive transthoracic echocardiography.

RESULTS

Patients with OS had significantly lower meanSaO₂ but higher T90 than subjects with isolated SA and isolated RVD. Patients with OS vs. those with isolated SA had higher odds of PHTN in multivariable analysis with age, sex, and body mass index adjusted for (OR 2.96, 95%CI 1.05-8.91, p = 0.040). Patients with meanSaO₂ < 92% vs. meanSaO₂ ≥ 92% had significantly higher odds of being diagnosed with PHTN (OR 5.40, 95%CI 2.01-15.7, p < 0.001). Similarly, T90 (≥ 4.5% versus < 4.5%) was also independently associated with the prevalence of PHTN (OR 7.21, 95%CI 2.54-23.67, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Patients with OS of RVD and SA had severe hypoxemia, which is associated with the prevalence of PHTN. Further investigation is needed to discern whether therapeutic strategies toward OS might mitigate PHTN in this cohort.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinical Trial Registration No. ChiCTR1900027294 on 1 October 2019.

Effectiveness of different treatments in obesity hypoventilation syndrome

Obesity hypoventilation syndrome (OHS) is an undesirable consequence of obesity, defined as daytime hypoventilation, sleep disorder breathing and obesity; during the past few years the prevalence of extreme obesity has markedly increased worldwide consequently increasing the prevalence of OHS. Patients with OHS have a lower quality of life and a higher risk of unfavourable cardiometabolic consequences. Early diagnosis and effective treatment can lead to significant improvement in patient outcomes; therefore, such data has noticeably raised interest in the management and treatment of this sleep disorder. This paper will discuss the findings on the main current treatment modalities OHS will be discussed.

Long-term outcome with focus on pulmonary hypertension in Obesity Hypoventilation Syndrome

INTRODUCTION

Pulmonary Hypertension (PH) is a frequent comorbidity in Obesity Hypoventilation Syndrome (OHS).

OBJECTIVE

We investigated long-term outcome of OHS with a particular emphasis on PH.

METHODS

In a prospective design, 64 patients with OHS and established noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV), were assessed by serum biomarkers, right heart catheterization, blood gases analysis, lung function, Epworth-Sleepiness Scale (ESS), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), World Health Organization-functional class (WHO-FC) and health-related quality of life (HRQL) via the Severe Respiratory Insufficiency (SRI) questionnaire. After a planned follow-up of 5 years patients were reassessed regarding vital status, WHO-FC, ESS, SRI, PSQI, body mass index (BMI) and NPPV use. Prognostic markers were explored using univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses.

RESULTS

At the 5-year follow-up, BMI tended to decrease (P = 0.05), while WHO-FC, ESS and PSQI remained unchanged. HRQL deteriorated in terms of SRI summary score and most subdomains (P < .05 each). NPPV adherence still was high (89%), while daily NPPV use increased from 6.7 (5.1; 8.0) h/d to 8.2 (7.4; 9.0) h/d (P < .05). After a 5-year follow-up, mortality was 25.8%. In univariate regression analyses only age > 69.5 years (HR = 4.145, 95%-CI = 1.180-14.565, P = 0.016), NT-proBNP > 1256 pg/mL (HR = 5.162, 95%-CI = 1.136-23.467, P = 0.018), diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO, %pred) (HR = 0.341, 95%-CI = 0.114-1.019, P = 0.043) and higher oxygen use during daytime (HR = 5.236, 95%-CI = 1.489-18.406, P = 0.004) predicted mortality. No independent factor predicting mortality was detected in multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

Despite a high long-term NPPV use HRQL worsened. Age, oxygen use at baseline, DLCO (%pred) and NT-proBNP, as a surrogate parameter for PH, were related to long-term survival.

Echocardiographic Changes with Positive Airway Pressure Therapy in Obesity Hypoventilation Syndrome. Long-Term Pickwick Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Rationale: Obesity hypoventilation syndrome (OHS) has been associated with cardiac dysfunction. However, randomized trials assessing the impact of long-term noninvasive ventilation (NIV) or continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) on cardiac structure and function assessed by echocardiography are lacking.Objectives: In a prespecified secondary analysis of the largest multicenter randomized controlled trial of OHS (Pickwick Project; N = 221 patients with OHS and coexistent severe obstructive sleep apnea), we compared the effectiveness of three years of NIV and CPAP on structural and functional echocardiographic changes.Methods: At baseline and annually during three sequential years, patients underwent transthoracic two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography. Echocardiographers at each site were blinded to the treatment allocation. Statistical analysis was performed using a linear mixed-effects model with a treatment group and repeated measures interaction to determine the differential effect between CPAP and NIV.Measurements and Main Results: A total of 196 patients were analyzed: 102 were treated with CPAP and 94 were treated with NIV. Systolic pulmonary artery pressure decreased from 40.5 ± 1.47 mm Hg at baseline to 35.3 ± 1.33 mm Hg at three years with CPAP, and from 41.5 ± 1.56 mm Hg to 35.5 ± 1.42 with NIV (P < 0.0001 for longitudinal intragroup changes for both treatment arms). However, there were no significant differences between groups. NIV and CPAP therapies similarly improved left ventricular diastolic dysfunction and reduced left atrial diameter. Both NIV and CPAP improved respiratory function and dyspnea.Conclusions: In patients with OHS who have concomitant severe obstructive sleep apnea, long-term treatment with NIV and CPAP led to similar degrees of improvement in pulmonary hypertension and left ventricular diastolic dysfunction.Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01405976).

Long-term Noninvasive Ventilation in Obesity Hypoventilation Syndrome Without Severe OSA: The Pickwick Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) is an effective form of treatment in obesity hypoventilation syndrome (OHS) with severe OSA. However, there is paucity of evidence in patients with OHS without severe OSA phenotype.

RESEARCH QUESTION

Is NIV effective in OHS without severe OSA phenotype?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

In this multicenter, open-label parallel group clinical trial performed at 16 sites in Spain, we randomly assigned 98 stable ambulatory patients with untreated OHS and apnea-hypopnea index < 30 events/h (ie, no severe OSA) to NIV or lifestyle modification (control group) using simple randomization through an electronic database. The primary end point was hospitalization days per year. Secondary end points included other hospital resource utilization, incident cardiovascular events, mortality, respiratory functional tests, BP, quality of life, sleepiness, and other clinical symptoms. Both investigators and patients were aware of the treatment allocation; however, treating physicians from the routine care team were not aware of patients' enrollment in the clinical trial. The study was stopped early in its eighth year because of difficulty identifying patients with OHS without severe OSA. The analysis was performed according to intention-to-treat and per-protocol principles and by adherence subgroups.

RESULTS

Forty-nine patients in the NIV group and 49 in the control group were randomized, and 48 patients in each group were analyzed. During a median follow-up of 4.98 years (interquartile range, 2.98-6.62), the mean hospitalization days per year ± SD was 2.60 ± 5.31 in the control group and 2.71 ± 4.52 in the NIV group (adjusted rate ratio, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.44-2.59; P = .882). NIV therapy, in contrast with the control group, produced significant longitudinal improvement in Paco₂, pH, bicarbonate, quality of life (Medical Outcome Survey Short Form 36 physical component), and daytime sleepiness. Moreover, per-protocol analysis showed a statistically significant difference for the time until the first ED visit favoring NIV. In the subgroup with high NIV adherence, the time until the first event of hospital admission, ED visit, and mortality was longer than in the low adherence subgroup. Adverse events were similar between arms.

INTERPRETATION

In stable ambulatory patients with OHS without severe OSA, NIV and lifestyle modification had similar long-term hospitalization days per year. A more intensive program aimed at improving NIV adherence may lead to better outcomes. Larger studies are necessary to better determine the long-term benefit of NIV in this subgroup of OHS.

TRIAL REGISTRY

ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT01405976; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.

Cost-effectiveness of positive airway pressure modalities in obesity hypoventilation syndrome with severe obstructive sleep apnoea

BACKGROUND

Obesity hypoventilation syndrome (OHS) is treated with either non-invasive ventilation (NIV) or CPAP, but there are no long-term cost-effectiveness studies comparing the two treatment modalities.

OBJECTIVES

We performed a large, multicentre, randomised, open-label controlled study to determine the comparative long-term cost and effectiveness of NIV versus CPAP in patients with OHS with severe obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) using hospitalisation days as the primary outcome measure.

METHODS

Hospital resource utilisation and within trial costs were evaluated against the difference in effectiveness based on the primary outcome (hospitalisation days/year, transformed and non-transformed in monetary term). Costs and effectiveness were estimated from a log-normal distribution using a Bayesian approach. A secondary analysis by adherence subgroups was performed.

RESULTS

In total, 363 patients were selected, 215 were randomised and 202 were available for the analysis. The median (IQR) follow-up was 3.01 (2.91-3.14) years for NIV group and 3.00 (2.92-3.17) years for CPAP. The mean (SD) Bayesian estimated hospital days was 2.13 (0.73) for CPAP and 1.89 (0.78) for NIV. The mean (SD) Bayesian estimated cost per patient/year in the NIV arm, excluding hospitalisation costs, was €2075.98 (91.6), which was higher than the cost in the CPAP arm of €1219.06 (52.3); mean difference €857.6 (105.5). CPAP was more cost-effective than NIV (99.5% probability) because longer hospital stay in the CPAP arm was compensated for by its lower costs. Similar findings were observed in the high and low adherence subgroups.

CONCLUSION

CPAP is more cost-effective than NIV; therefore, CPAP should be the preferred treatment for patients with OHS with severe OSA.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT01405976.

Pressure modification or humidification for improving usage of continuous positive airway pressure machines in adults with obstructive sleep apnoea

BACKGROUND

Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is the repetitive closure of the upper airway during sleep. This results in disturbed sleep and excessive daytime sleepiness. It is a risk factor for long-term cardiovascular morbidity. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) machines can be applied during sleep. They deliver air pressure by a nasal or oronasal mask to prevent the airway from closing, reducing sleep disturbance and improving sleep quality. Some people find them difficult to tolerate because of high pressure levels and other symptoms such as a dry mouth. Switching to machines that vary the level of air pressure required to reduce sleep disturbance could increase comfort and promote more regular use. Humidification devices humidify the air that is delivered to the upper airway through the CPAP circuit. Humidification may reduce dryness of the throat and mouth and thus improve CPAP tolerability. This updated Cochrane Review looks at modifying the delivery of positive pressure and humidification on machine usage and other clinical outcomes in OSA.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effects of positive pressure modification or humidification on increasing CPAP machine usage in adults with OSA.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched Cochrane Airways Specialised Register and clinical trials registries on 15 October 2018.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised parallel group or cross-over trials in adults with OSA. We included studies that compared automatically adjusting CPAP (auto-CPAP), bilevel positive airway pressure (bi-PAP), CPAP with expiratory pressure relief (CPAPexp), heated humidification plus fixed CPAP, automatically adjusting CPAP with expiratory pressure relief, Bi-PAP with expiratory pressure relief, auto bi-PAP and CPAPexp with wakefulness detection with fixed pressure setting.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methods expected by Cochrane. We assessed the certainty of evidence using GRADE for the outcomes of machine usage, symptoms (measured by the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS)), Apnoea Hypopnoea Index (AHI), quality of life measured by Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire (FOSQ), blood pressure, withdrawals and adverse events (e.g. nasal blockage or mask intolerance). The main comparison of interest in the review is auto-CPAP versus fixed CPAP.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 64 studies (3922 participants, 75% male). The main comparison of auto-CPAP with fixed CPAP is based on 36 studies with 2135 participants from Europe, USA, Hong Kong and Australia. The majority of studies recruited participants who were recently diagnosed with OSA and had not used CPAP previously. They had excessive sleepiness (ESS: 13), severe sleep disturbance (AHI ranged from 22 to 59), and average body mass index (BMI) of 35 kg/m2. Interventions were delivered at home and the duration of most studies was 12 weeks or less. We judged that studies at high or unclear risk of bias likely influenced the effect of auto-CPAP on machine usage, symptoms, quality of life and tolerability, but not for other outcomes. Primary outcome Compared with average usage of about five hours per night with fixed CPAP, people probably use auto-CPAP for 13 minutes longer per night at about six weeks (mean difference (MD) 0.21 hours/night, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.11 to 0.31; 31 studies, 1452 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). We do not have enough data to determine whether auto-CPAP increases the number of people who use machines for more than four hours per night compared with fixed CPAP (odds ratio (OR) 1.16, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.81; 2 studies, 346 participants; low-certainty evidence). Secondary outcomes Auto-CPAP probably reduces daytime sleepiness compared with fixed CPAP at about six weeks by a small amount (MD -0.44 ESS units, 95% CI -0.72 to -0.16; 25 studies, 1285 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). AHI is slightly higher with auto-CPAP than with fixed CPAP (MD 0.48 events per hour, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.80; 26 studies, 1256 participants; high-certainty evidence), although it fell with both machine types from baseline values in the studies. Ten per cent of people in auto-CPAP and 11% in the fixed CPAP arms withdrew from the studies (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.64 to 1.27; moderate-certainty evidence). Auto-CPAP and fixed CPAP may have similar effects on quality of life, as measured by the FOSQ but more evidence is needed to be confident in this result (MD 0.12, 95% CI -0.21 to 0.46; 3 studies, 352 participants; low-certainty evidence). Two studies (353 participants) provided data on clinic-measured blood pressure. Auto-CPAP may be slightly less effective at reducing diastolic blood pressure compared to fixed CPAP (MD 2.92 mmHg, 95% CI 1.06 to 4.77 mmHg; low-certainty evidence). The two modalities of CPAP probably do not differ in their effects on systolic blood pressure (MD 1.87 mmHg, 95% CI -1.08 to 4.82; moderate-certainty evidence). Nine studies (574 participants) provided information on adverse events such as nasal blockage, dry mouth, tolerance of treatment pressure and mask leak. They used different scales to capture these outcomes and due to variation in the direction and size of effect between the studies, the comparative effects on tolerability outcomes are uncertain (very low-certainty evidence).  The evidence base for other interventions is smaller, and does not provide sufficient information to determine whether there are important differences between pressure modification strategies and fixed CPAP on machine usage outcomes, symptoms and quality of life. As with the evidence for the auto-CPAP, adverse events are measured disparately.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In adults with moderate to severe sleep apnoea starting positive airway pressure therapy, auto-CPAP probably increases machine usage by about 13 minutes per night. The effects on daytime sleepiness scores with auto-CPAP are not clinically meaningful. AHI values are slightly lower with fixed CPAP. Use of validated quality of life instruments in the studies to date has been limited, although where they have been used the effect sizes have not exceeded proposed clinically important differences. The adoption of a standardised approach to measuring tolerability would help decision-makers to balance benefits with harms from the different treatment options available. The evidence available for other pressure modification strategies does not provide a reliable basis on which to draw firm conclusions. Future studies should look at the effects of pressure modification devices and humidification in people who have already used CPAP but are unable to persist with treatment.

Frontiers in Clinical Practice of Long-Term Care of Chronic Ventilatory Failure

Home mechanical ventilation (HMV) is an effective long-term treatment for chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure. In addition to the established practice of providing HMV for the treatment of chronic ventilatory failure in slowly progressive neuromuscular and chest wall disease, there is accumulating evidence for improvement of quality of life and prolongation of survival by HMV in highly prevalent diseases like chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and ever-increasing obesity hypoventilation syndrome as well as rapidly progressive neuromuscular disease. The key concepts for successful HMV are an experienced team selecting the right patients, timely initiation of adequate ventilation via an appropriate interface, and monitoring effectiveness during regular long-term follow-up. Coaching of patients with chronic respiratory failure on long-term HMV within a dedicated service and collaborations with community services for home care are essential. The current review describes various important practical aspects of HMV that remain frontiers in the implementation of the current knowledge in clinical practice and may help in providing effective HMV to all those in need.

Non-invasive ventilation for obese patients with chronic respiratory failure: Are two pressures always better than one?

Obesity-related respiratory failure is increasingly common but remains under-diagnosed and under-treated. There are several clinical phenotypes reported, including severe obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA), isolated nocturnal hypoventilation with or without severe OSA and OSA complicating chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The presence of hypercapnic respiratory failure is associated with poor clinical outcomes in each of these groups. While weight loss is a core aim of management, this is often unachievable, and treatment of sleep-disordered breathing with positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy is the mainstay of clinical practice. Although there are few long-term clinical efficacy trials, the lack of equipoise would prevent the utilization of an untreated control group. The current data support the use of PAP therapy to improve respiratory failure and is associated with improvements in health-related quality of life, reduced healthcare utilization and reduced mortality. Both continuous PAP (CPAP) and non-invasive ventilation (NIV) appear safe and effective in patients with obesity-related respiratory failure and OSA, with or without COPD, and the current evidence would not support a single therapy choice in all patients. There are no studies of CPAP in patients with isolated nocturnal hypoventilation, and NIV would be the current recommendation in this patient group. Whichever starting therapy is used, titration should be performed to correct sleep-disordered breathing and reverse chronic respiratory failure, with consideration of step-down of the treatment based on a clinical re-evaluation. In contrast, failure to reach physiological and clinical treatment targets should lead to the consideration of treatment escalation.

Obesity hypoventilation syndrome

Obesity hypoventilation syndrome (OHS) is defined as a combination of obesity (body mass index ≥30 kg·m-2), daytime hypercapnia (arterial carbon dioxide tension ≥45 mmHg) and sleep disordered breathing, after ruling out other disorders that may cause alveolar hypoventilation. OHS prevalence has been estimated to be ∼0.4% of the adult population. OHS is typically diagnosed during an episode of acute-on-chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure or when symptoms lead to pulmonary or sleep consultation in stable conditions. The diagnosis is firmly established after arterial blood gases and a sleep study. The presence of daytime hypercapnia is explained by several co-existing mechanisms such as obesity-related changes in the respiratory system, alterations in respiratory drive and breathing abnormalities during sleep. The most frequent comorbidities are metabolic and cardiovascular, mainly heart failure, coronary disease and pulmonary hypertension. Both continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and noninvasive ventilation (NIV) improve clinical symptoms, quality of life, gas exchange, and sleep disordered breathing. CPAP is considered the first-line treatment modality for OHS phenotype with concomitant severe obstructive sleep apnoea, whereas NIV is preferred in the minority of OHS patients with hypoventilation during sleep with no or milder forms of obstructive sleep apnoea (approximately <30% of OHS patients). Acute-on-chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure is habitually treated with NIV. Appropriate management of comorbidities including medications and rehabilitation programmes are key issues for improving prognosis.