Blood culture bottle culture of pleural fluid in pleural infection

Microbiological diagnosis of pleural infections: a comparative evaluation of a novel syndromic real-time PCR panel

Current microbial diagnostics for pleural infections are insufficient. Studies using 16S targeted next-generation sequencing report that only 10%-16% of bacteria present are cultured and that 50%-78% of pleural fluids containing relevant microbial DNA remain culture negative. As a rapid diagnostic alternative suitable for clinical laboratories, we wanted to explore a PCR-based approach. Based on the identification of key pathogens, we developed a syndromic PCR panel for community-acquired pleural infections (CAPIs). This was a pragmatic PCR panel, meaning that it was not designed for detecting all possibly involved bacterial species but for confirming the diagnosis of CAPI, and for detecting bacteria that might influence choice of antimicrobial treatment. We evaluated the PCR panel on 109 confirmed CAPIs previously characterized using culture and 16S targeted next-generation sequencing. The PCR secured the diagnosis of CAPI in 107/109 (98.2%) and detected all present pathogens in 69/109 (63.3%). Culture secured the diagnosis in 54/109 (49.5%) and detected all pathogens in 31/109 (28.4%). Corresponding results for 16S targeted next-generation sequencing were 109/109 (100%) and 98/109 (89.9%). For bacterial species included in the PCR panel, PCR had a sensitivity of 99.5% (184/185), culture of 21.6% (40/185), and 16S targeted next-generation sequencing of 92.4% (171/185). None of the bacterial species present not covered by the PCR panel were judged to impact antimicrobial therapy. A syndromic PCR panel represents a rapid and sensitive alternative to current diagnostic approaches for the microbiological diagnosis of CAPI.IMPORTANCEPleural empyema is a severe infection with high mortality and increasing incidence. Long hospital admissions and long courses of antimicrobial treatment drive healthcare and ecological costs. Current methods for microbiological diagnostics of pleural infections are inadequate. Recent studies using 16S targeted next-generation sequencing as a reference standard find culture to recover only 10%-16% of bacteria present and that 50%-78% of samples containing relevant bacterial DNA remain culture negative. To confirm the diagnosis of pleural infection and define optimal antimicrobial therapy while limiting unnecessary use of broad-spectrum antibiotics, there is a need for rapid and sensitive diagnostic approaches. PCR is a rapid method well suited for clinical laboratories. In this paper we show that a novel syndromic PCR panel can secure the diagnosis of pleural infection and detect all bacteria relevant for choice of antimicrobial treatment with a high sensitivity.

Diagnostic and prognostic implications of bacteremia in patients with complicated pleural infection

Objectives

The clinical significance of bacteremia in patients with complicated pleural infection is still uncertain. We aimed to examine the incidence and clinical significance of bacteremia in patients with complicated pleural infection.

Methods

This retrospective study comprised of consecutive patients who received pleural drainage due to complicated parapneumonic effusion or empyema. The clinical, laboratory, and radiologic data and clinical outcome were compared between patients with and without bacteremia. Additionally, the factors associated with overall mortality were evaluated in these patients.

Results

Of 341 patients included in the analysis, 25 (7 %) had a positive blood culture. Blood culture testing added 2 % identification of causative pathogen compared to pleural fluid culture alone. By multivariable analysis, radiologic features of cavitary lesion, a RAPID score≥5, and a positive microbial culture in pleural fluid were independently associated with bacteremia. Despite these clinical distinctions, there was ultimately no significant difference in in-hospital mortality between patients with and without bacteremia (3 vs. 4 %, p=1.0). The only factor significantly associated with overall mortality among patients with complicated pleural infections was a higher RAPID score [HR=1.96 (95 % CI=1.35-2.84)].

Conclusions

The rate of bacteremia in patients with complicated pleural infection was 7 %. Blood culture testing demonstrated limited diagnostic yield and had minimal impact on clinical outcomes compared to pleural fluid culture. Therefore, it seems that blood culture testing is more advantageous for specific patients with suspected pleural infection who have cavitary lesions or a RAPID score≥5.

Blood culture bottles for culturing cerebrospinal fluid in cases of bacterial meningitis caused by Enterococcus faecalis: A case report

Pathogen identification is essential for the treatment of bacterial meningitis. However, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) culture tests are often negative when antimicrobial agents are administered before CSF is collected. Therefore, it is necessary to improve the culturing process for such samples. Here, we report a case of bacterial meningitis where the causative bacteria were detected by inoculating that patient's CSF samples into blood culture bottles. A 52-year-old man developed a fever and headache after undergoing transnasal transsphenoidal surgery for a nonfunctioning pituitary neuroendocrine tumor. He was suspected of having a wound infection, for which he was treated with cefozopran and vancomycin. A CSF test was also performed, owing to persistent fever, and bacterial meningitis was suspected. Although conventional CSF culture tests were negative, CSF cultures using blood culture bottles detected Enterococcus faecalis. The antimicrobial agents were therefore changed to ampicillin and gentamicin, after which the patient's meningitis improved. The blood culture bottles used contained adsorbed polymer beads with antimicrobial neutralizing properties, which likely contributed to the isolation of the bacteria. In addition to conventional cultures, ones done in blood culture bottles may be useful for diagnosing bacterial meningitis via CSF samples-particularly in cases where antimicrobial agents have already been administered.

Diagnosis and management of pleural infection

Pleural infection remains a medical challenge. Although closed tube drainage revolutionised treatment in the 19th century, pleural infection still poses a significant health burden with increasing incidence. Diagnosis presents challenges due to non-specific clinical presenting features. Imaging techniques such as chest radiographs, thoracic ultrasound and computed tomography scans aid diagnosis. Pleural fluid analysis, the gold standard, involves assessing gross appearance, biochemical markers and microbiology. Novel biomarkers such as suPAR (soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor) and PAI-1 (plasminogen activator inhibitor-1) show promise in diagnosis and prognosis, and microbiology demonstrates complex microbial diversity and is associated with outcomes. The management of pleural infection involves antibiotic therapy, chest drain insertion, intrapleural fibrinolytic therapy and surgery. Antibiotic therapy relies on empirical broad-spectrum antibiotics based on local policies, infection setting and resistance patterns. Chest drain insertion is the mainstay of management, and use of intrapleural fibrinolytics facilitates effective drainage. Surgical interventions such as video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery and decortication are considered in cases not responding to medical therapy. Risk stratification tools such as the RAPID (renal, age, purulence, infection source and dietary factors) score may help guide tailored management. The roles of other modalities such as local anaesthetic medical thoracoscopy and intrapleural antibiotics are debated. Ongoing research aims to improve outcomes by matching interventions with risk profile and to better understand the development of disease.

The clinical features and prognosis of fungal pleural infection: A case series and literature review

Fungal pleural infections are infrequent and insidious, for which there are neither large clinical studies nor targeted guidelines to provide standardized treatment options. We reported 4 cases of fungal pleural infection and reviewed the cases of fungal pleural infections in previous studies to provide a basis for the diagnosis and treatment of fungal pleural infections. There were 2 females and 2 males with a mean age of 58.5 years in our data. The average time from onset to diagnosis was 30.25 days. Risk factors most frequently included pulmonary diseases (n = 4) and malignancy (n = 1). Two patients underwent pleural biopsy through a thoracoscope, and no pathogens were detected. Pleural fluid culture was positive in 2 out of 3 cases. The diagnoses were "possible" (n = 1), "probable" (n = 1), and "proven" (n = 2). All patients received systemic antifungal therapy, and 3 received combined thoracic drainage. The outcomes were cured (n = 1), improved (n = 2) and lost to follow-up (n = 1). We reviewed 12 cases of fungal pleural infection in previous studies. The diagnosis was confirmed via culture in 7 cases and via biopsy in 8 cases. The pathogen was Aspergillus in 7 cases. After a combination of systemic antifungal (n = 12) and local treatment (n = 11), 10 patients improved and 2 patients died. Diagnosis of fungal pleural infection should incorporate risk factors, clinical presentation and fungal evidence, with pleural fluid culture being an important and feasible mean of confirming the diagnosis; and treatment should be based on systemic antifungal therapy supplemented by topical therapy.

A Review of Current Practices and Future Trends in Body Fluid Testing

BACKGROUND

Body fluid testing in the clinical chemistry laboratory is a cornerstone in the diagnostic workup of pathological effusions. Laboratorians may not be aware of the preanalytical workflows used in the collection of body fluids though the value is evident whenever processes change or issues arise. The analytical validation requirements can vary depending on the regulations dictated by the laboratories' jurisdiction and accreditor requirements. Much of analytical validation hinges on how useful testing is to clinical care. Usefulness of testing varies with how well established and incorporated the tests and interpretation are in practice guidelines.

CONTENT

Body fluid collections are depicted and described so clinical laboratorians have a basic appreciation of what specimens are submitted to the laboratory for testing. A review of validation requirements by major laboratory accreditation entities is presented. A review of the usefulness and proposed decision limits for common body fluid chemistry analytes is presented. Body fluid tests that show promise and those that are losing (or lost long ago) value are also reviewed.

SUMMARY

The total testing process from collection to result interpretation can be complicated and easily overlooked by the clinical laboratory. This review aims to improve the understanding and awareness of collections, validation, result interpretation, and provide an update on recent trends.

Expert Review on Nonsurgical Management of Parapneumonic Effusion: Advances, Controversies, and New Directions

Parapneumonic effusion and empyema are rising in incidence worldwide, particularly in association with comorbidities in an aging population. Also driving this change is the widespread uptake of pneumococcal vaccines, leading to the emergence of nonvaccine-type pneumococci and other bacteria. Early treatment with systemic antibiotics is essential but should be guided by local microbial guidelines and antimicrobial resistance patterns due to significant geographical variation. Thoracic ultrasound has emerged as a leading imaging technique in parapneumonic effusion, enabling physicians to characterize effusions, assess the underlying parenchyma, and safely guide pleural procedures. Drainage decisions remain based on longstanding criteria including the size of the effusion and fluid gram stain and biochemistry results. Small-bore chest drains appear to be as effective as large bore and are adequate for the delivery of intrapleural enzyme therapy (IET), which is now supported by a large body of evidence. The IET dosing regimen used in the UK Multicenter Sepsis Trial -2 has the most evidence available but data surrounding alternative dosing, concurrent and once-daily instillations, and novel fibrinolytic agents are promising. Prognostic scores used in pneumonia (e.g., CURB-65) tend to underestimate mortality in parapneumonic effusion/empyema. Scores specifically based on pleural infection have been developed but require validation in prospective cohorts.

Phenotyping empyema by pleural fluid culture results and macroscopic appearance: an 8-year retrospective study

Background

The clinical impact of phenotyping empyema is poorly described. This study was designed to evaluate clinical characteristics and outcomes based on the two readily available parameters, pleural fluid culture status and macroscopic fluid appearance.

Methods

A retrospective study was conducted on patients with empyema hospitalised between 2013 and 2020. Empyema was classified into culture-positive empyema (CPE) or culture-negative empyema (CNE) and pus-appearing empyema (PAE) or non-pus-appearing empyema (non-PAE) based on the pleural fluid culture status and macroscopic fluid appearance, respectively.

Results

Altogether, 212 patients had confirmed empyema (CPE: n=188, CNE: n=24; PAE: n=118, non-PAE: n=94). The cohort was predominantly male (n=163, 76.9%) with a mean age of 65.0±13.6 years. Most patients (n=180, 84.9%) had at least one comorbidity. Patients with CPE had higher rates of in-hospital mortality (19.1% versus 0.0%, p=0.017) and 90-day mortality (18.6% versus 0.0%, p=0.017) and more extrapulmonary sources of infection (29.8% versus 8.3%, p=0.026) when compared with patients with CNE. No significant difference in mortality rate was found between PAE and non-PAE during the in-hospital stay and at 30 days and 90 days. Patients with PAE had less extrapulmonary sources of infection (20.3% versus 36.2%, p=0.010) and more anaerobic infection (40.9% versus 24.5%, p=0.017) than those with non-PAE. The median RAPID (renal, age, purulence, infection source, and dietary factors) scores were higher in the CPE and non-PAE groups. After adjusting for covariates, culture positivity was not independently associated with mortality on multivariable analysis.

Conclusion

Empyema is a heterogeneous disease with different clinical characteristics. Phenotyping empyema into different subclasses based on pleural fluid microbiological results and macroscopic fluid appearance provides insight into the underlying bacteriology, source of infection and subsequent clinical outcomes.

Optimal diagnostic strategies for pleural diseases and identifying high-risk patients

INTRODUCTION

Pleural diseases encompass a broad range of conditions with diverse and heterogenous etiologies. Diagnostics in pleural diseases thus represents a challenging field with a wide array of available testing to distinguish between the numerous causes of pleural disease. Nonetheless, deploying best practice diagnostics in this area is essential in reducing both duration o the investigation pathway and symptom burden.

AREAS COVERED

This article critically appraises the optimal diagnostic strategies and pathway in patients with pleural disease, reviewing the latest evidence and key practice points in achieving a treatable diagnosis in patients with pleural disease. We also cover future and novel directions that are likely to influence pleural diagnostics in the near future. PubMed was searched for articles related to pleural diagnostics (search terms below), with the date ranges including June 2012 to June 2022.

EXPERT OPINION

No single test will ever be sufficient to provide a diagnosis in pleural conditions. The key to reducing procedure burden and duration to diagnosis lies in personalizing the investigation pathway to patients and deploying tests with the highest diagnostic yield early (such as pleural biopsy in infection and malignancy). Novel biomarkers may also allow earlier diagnostic precision in the near future.

Management of complicated parapneumonic effusions

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Approximately 36-57% of cases of pneumonia are associated with a parapneumonic effusion (PPE). It begins as sterile effusion, which can quickly evolve to a fibrinopurulent stage with evidence of infection called complicated parapneumonic effusions (CPPE). Marked fibrinous organization then follows. This study focuses on literature synthesis on management of CPPE.

RECENT FINDINGS

Ultrasound has become an indispensable tool in the identification and treatment of CPPE. Prompt antibiotic administration remains the universal standard of care. Decision to drain the fluid is based on fluid staging, characterization and assessment of risk of poor outcomes vs. risk of complications. There is growing evidence to support use of intrapleural fibrinolytic therapy (IPFT) in case of loculated effusions. Newer areas of research include antibodies against plasminogen activator inhibitors and stratification scores that can identify patients at an increased risk. Lastly, timing of surgical referral is an important area under study.

SUMMARY

Evolution of medical therapy over recent years has increased treatment success rates. Use of IPFT in conjunction to thoracostomy is now the standard of care for loculated effusions. Understanding available therapeutic options, both medical and interventional, can ensure evidence-based practice and improve patient-centred outcomes.

Candida Empyema in Febrile Neutropenia - Augmented value of direct inoculation into BacT/Alert blood culture vials

Candida empyema is an uncommon complication of febrile neutropenia. We present 4 such cases which highlight the importance of direct inoculation of body fluids in automated blood culture bottle leading to increased yield. Our cases and review of literature also highlight that echinocandins have poor penetration into pleural fluid; azoles (especially voriconazole) should be preferred as drug of choice.

Alteplase Dose Assessment for Pleural infection Therapy (ADAPT) Study-2: Use of 2.5 mg alteplase as a starting intrapleural dose

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Intrapleural tissue plasminogen activator/deoxyribonuclease (tPA/DNase) therapy is increasingly used in pleural infection. Bleeding risks and costs associated with tPA remain the clinical concerns. Our dose de-escalation series aims to establish the lowest effective dosing regimen for tPA/DNase. This study assesses the intrapleural use of 2.5 mg tPA/5 mg DNase for pleural infection.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with pleural infection treated with a starting regime of 2.5 mg tPA/5 mg DNase were included from two centres in Australia and UK. Escalation of tPA dose was permitted if clinical response was inadequate.

RESULTS

Sixty-nine patients (mean age 61.0 years) received intrapleural 2.5 mg tPA/5 mg DNase. Most (88.4%) were treated successfully and discharged from hospital without surgery by 90 days. Patients received a median of 5 [interquartile range [IQR] = 3-6] doses of tPA/DNase. Total amount of tPA used per patient was 12.5 mg [median, IQR = 7.5-15.0]. Seventeen patients required dose escalation of tPA; most (n = 12) for attempted drainage of distant non-communicating locule(s). Treatment success was corroborated by clearance of pleural opacities on radiographs (from median 27.0% [IQR = 17.1-44.5] to 11.0% [IQR = 6.4-23.3] of hemithorax, p < 0.0001), increased pleural fluid drainage (1.98 L [median, IQR = 1.38-2.68] over 72 h following commencement of tPA/DNase) and reduction of serum C-reactive protein level (by 45.0% [IQR = 39.3-77.0] from baseline at day 5, p < 0.0001). Two patients required surgery. Six patients with significant comorbidities (e.g., advanced cancer) had ongoing infection when palliated and died. Two patients experienced self-limiting pleural bleeding and received blood transfusion.

CONCLUSION

A starting intrapleural regime of 2.5 mg tPA/5 mg DNase, with up-titration if needed, can be effective and deserves further exploration.

Parapneumonic Effusion and Empyema

The rising incidence and high morbidity of pleural infection remain a significant challenge to health care systems worldwide. With distinct microbiology and treatment paradigms from pneumonia, pleural infection is an area in which the evidence base has been rapidly evolving. Progress in recent years has revolved around characterizing the microbiome of pleural infection and the addition of new strategies such as intrapleural enzyme therapy to the established treatment pathway of drainage and antibiotics. The future of improving outcomes lies with personalizing treatment, establishing optimal timing of intrapleural agents and surgery, alongside wider use of risk stratification to guide treatment.

Saline lavage for the management of severe pleural empyema: A cohort study

BACKGROUND

Despite advances in the treatment of pleural infection, up to 20% of patients die. So far, studies assessing the role of intrapleural saline lavage for the management of all stage pleural infections are very scarce, usually excluding patients with cancer.

METHODS

The method used was a retrospective cohort study including pleural empyema managed with a pleural lavage of saline solution through a small-bore chest tube. The primary outcome was the rate of failure at 3 months (surgical referral or additional pleural manoeuver due to recurrent infection or all-cause mortality). Secondary outcomes were hospital stay, the change of the chest radiograph and inflammatory biomarkers, and complications.

RESULTS

Thirty patients with pleural empyema were included, 11 (36.7%) with an active cancer. The overall rate of failure at 3 months was 13.3% (surgical referral = 0; additional pleural manoeuver = 3; mortality = 1). Median length of pleural lavage and hospital stay were, respectively, 14 days (7-28) and 17 days (11-42). Inflammatory markers and size of the effusion on chest radiograph significantly decreased for Day 0 to Day 14. No chest tube blockade was reported, but seven (23.3%) accidentally withdrew. No other side effects were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Intrapleural saline lavage is efficient and safe for the management of pleural empyema, even in severe status patients with cancer, at the cost of a prolonged hospitalization.

Medical thoracoscopy in intensive care unit

During the last decade, there has been a tremendous effort towards making procedures less invasive, which could reduce complications, decrease hospital stay and minimize overall health care cost. Medical thoracoscopy (MT) or pleuroscopy is a minimally invasive procedure commonly performed by interventional pulmonologist in United States. It has a favorable safety profile allowing access to the pleural cavity with a thoracoscope via a small chest wall incision to perform diagnostic or therapeutic interventions under direct visualization. MT allows the physician to perform pleural biopsy with high accuracy, drain loculated pleural effusion, guide chest tube placement and perform pleurodesis. As compared to video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS), MT is less invasive, does not require single lung ventilation, has a comparable diagnostic yield, and better tolerated in high-risk patients. MT can also be performed at bedside in critically ill patients. Although MT is generally safe, a multi-disciplinary discussion between the interventional pulmonologist, intensive care team, anesthesiologist and thoracic team is necessary to ensure best clinical practice as well as minimize complications for such high-risk patients. The purpose of this article is to review technique, diagnostic and therapeutic indications, as well as contraindications of performing bedside MT in intensive care unit. It aims to review both advantages and limitations of performing MT in intensive care unit.

Spectrum of Microorganisms, Antibiotic Resistance Pattern, and Treatment Outcomes Among Patients With Empyema Thoracis: A Descriptive Cross-Sectional Study From the Bahawal Victoria Hospital Bahawalpur, Punjab, Pakistan

Background: This study involves the analysis of spectrum of microorganisms, antibiotic resistance pattern, and treatment outcomes among empyema thoracis patients. This study also analyzes the factors associated with unsuccessful treatment outcome and duration of hospital stay among the patients.

Methods: This was a descriptive, cross-sectional study carried out in the Pulmonology Ward of the Bahawal Victoria hospital, Bahawalpur, Pakistan. All patients with empyema thoracis registered at the study site during the period of 1 year were included in the study. Multivariate regression analysis was used to analyze the factors associated with duration of hospital stay and unsuccessful treatment outcome among the patients.

Results: A total 110 patients were included in the study. Most of the patients (n = 73, 66.4%) were treated with piperacillin/tazobactam alone and in combination with either one or more than one antibiotics as an empiric therapy. Culture was positive in 58 (52.7%) patients and the most commonly identified organisms included, gram-negative Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 20; 18.8%) and Klebsiella sp. (n = 11, 10%) followed by same proportion of E. coli. The most commonly identified bacterial isolates showed high level of resistance against antibiotics used as an empiric therapy, while these showed low level of resistance against amoxicillin, clarithromycin, ertapenem, colistin, tigecycline, fosfomycin, rifampicin, and vancomycin. In this study, 82 (74.5%) patients successfully completed the treatment, while 12 (11%) showed no clinical improvement, 5 (4.5%) lost to follow up and 11 (10%) died. In multivariate binary logistic regression analysis, none of the patient attributes were significantly associated with unsuccessful treatment outcome, while in multivariate linear regression analysis, the factors which were significantly associated with duration of hospital stay included; duration of symptoms <2 weeks prior to admission (p = 0.008, beta = −0.247) and resistance to five antibiotic classes (p = 0.02, beta = 0.280).

Conclusion: Close to 25% of the patients did not complete the treatment successfully. Most of the common bacterial isolates showed high level of resistance against the broad-spectrum antibiotics used as an empiric therapy. This is alarming. However, better sensitivity of common bacterial isolates against standardized first line treatment for empyema thoracis is promising.

Evaluation and management of pleural sepsis

Pleural sepsis stems from an infection within the pleural space typically from an underlying bacterial pneumonia leading to development of a parapneumonic effusion. This effusion is traditionally divided into uncomplicated, complicated, and empyema. Poor clinical outcomes and increased mortality can be associated with the development of parapneumonic effusions, reinforcing the importance of early recognition and diagnosis. Management necessitates a multimodal therapeutic strategy consisting of antimicrobials, catheter/tube thoracostomy, and at times, video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery.

Recent Insights into the Management of Pleural Infection

Pleural infection in adults has considerable morbidity and continues to be a life-threatening condition. The term “pleural infection” encompasses complicated parapneumonic effusions and primary pleural infections, and includes but is not limited to empyema, which refers to collection of pus in the pleural cavity. The incidence of pleural infection in adults has been continuously increasing over the past two decades, particularly in older adults, and most of such patients have comorbidities. Management of pleural infection requires prolonged duration of hospitalization (average 14 days). There are recognized differences in microbial etiology of pleural infection depending on whether the infection was acquired in the community or in a health-care setting. Anaerobic bacteria are acknowledged as a major cause of pleural infection, and thus anaerobic coverage in antibiotic regimens for pleural infection is mandatory. The key components of managing pleural infection are appropriate antimicrobial therapy and chest-tube drainage. In patients who fail medical therapy by manifesting persistent sepsis despite standard measures, surgical intervention to clear the infected space or intrapleural fibrinolytic therapy (in poor surgical candidates) are recommended. Recent studies have explored the role of early intrapleural fibrinolytics or first-line surgery, but due to considerable costs of such interventions and the lack of convincing evidence of improved outcomes with early use, early intervention cannot be recommended, and further evidence is awaited from ongoing studies. Other areas of research include the role of routine molecular testing of infected pleural fluid in improving the rate of identification of causative organisms. Other research topics include the benefit of such interventions as medical thoracoscopy, high-volume pleural irrigation with saline/antiseptic solution, and repeated thoracentesis (as opposed to chest-tube drainage) in reducing morbidity and improving outcomes of pleural infection. This review summarizes current knowledge and practice in managing pleural infection and future research directions.

HDAC Inhibitor Abrogates LTA-Induced PAI-1 Expression in Pleural Mesothelial Cells and Attenuates Experimental Pleural Fibrosis

Lipoteichoic acid (LTA) stimulates pleural mesothelial cell (PMC) to overproduce plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1), and thus may promote pleural fibrosis in Gram-positive bacteria (GPB) parapneumonic effusion (PPE). Histone deacetylase inhibitor (HDACi) was found to possess anti-fibrotic properties. However, the effects of HDACi on pleural fibrosis remain unclear. The effusion PAI-1 was measured among 64 patients with GPB PPE. Pleural fibrosis was measured as radiographical residual pleural thickening (RPT) and opacity at a 12-month follow-up. The LTA-stimulated human PMCs and intrapleural doxycycline-injected rats were pretreated with or without the pan-HDACi, m-carboxycinnamic acid bis-hydroxamide (CBHA), then PAI-1 and collagen expression and activated signalings in PMCs, and morphologic pleural changes in rats were measured. Effusion PAI-1 levels were significantly higher in GPB PPE patients with RPT > 10 mm (n = 26) than those without (n = 38), and had positive correlation with pleural fibrosis shadowing. CBHA significantly reduced LTA-induced PAI-1 and collagen expression via inhibition of JNK, and decreased PAI-1 promoter activity and mRNA levels in PMCs. Furthermore, in doxycycline-treated rats, CBHA substantially repressed PAI-1 and collagen synthesis in pleural mesothelium and minimized pleural fibrosis. Conclusively, CBHA abrogates LTA-induced PAI-1 and collagen expression in PMCs and attenuates experimental pleural fibrosis. PAI-1 inhibition by HDACi may confer potential therapy for pleural fibrosis.

Management of Pleural Infection

Pleural infection is a millennia-spanning condition that has proved challenging to treat over many years. Fourteen percent of cases of pneumonia are reported to present with a pleural effusion on chest X-ray (CXR), which rises to 44% on ultrasound but many will resolve with prompt antibiotic therapy. To guide treatment, parapneumonic effusions have been separated into distinct categories according to their biochemical, microbiological and radiological characteristics. There is wide variation in causative organisms according to geographical location and healthcare setting. Positive cultures are only obtained in 56% of cases; therefore, empirical antibiotics should provide Gram-positive, Gram-negative and anaerobic cover whilst providing adequate pleural penetrance. With the advent of next-generation sequencing techniques, yields are expected to improve. Complicated parapneumonic effusions and empyema necessitate prompt tube thoracostomy. It is reported that 16-27% treated in this way will fail on this therapy and require some form of escalation. The now seminal Multi-centre Intrapleural Sepsis Trials (MIST) demonstrated the use of combination fibrinolysin and DNase as more effective in the treatment of empyema compared to either agent alone or placebo, and success rates of 90% are reported with this technique. The focus is now on dose adjustments according to the patient's specific 'fibrinolytic potential', in order to deliver personalised therapy. Surgery has remained a cornerstone in the management of pleural infection and is certainly required in late-stage manifestations of the disease. However, its role in early-stage disease and optimal patient selection is being re-explored. A number of adjunct and exploratory therapies are also discussed in this review, including the use of local anaesthetic thoracoscopy, indwelling pleural catheters, intrapleural antibiotics, pleural irrigation and steroid therapy.

Community-acquired bacterial pneumonia in adults: An update

Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is the prominent cause of mortality and morbidity with important clinical impact across the globe. India accounts for 23 per cent of global pneumonia burden with case fatality rates between 14 and 30 per cent, and Streptococcus pneumoniae is considered a major bacterial aetiology. Emerging pathogens like Burkholderia pseudomallei is increasingly recognized as an important cause of CAP in Southeast Asian countries. Initial management in the primary care depends on clinical assessment while the hospitalized patients require combinations of clinical scores, chest radiography and various microbiological and biomarker assays. This comprehensive diagnostic approach together with additional sampling and molecular tests in selected high-risk patients should be practiced. Inappropriate therapy in CAP in hospitalized patients lengthens hospital stay and increases cost and mortality. In addition, emergence of multidrug-resistant organisms poses tough challenges in deciding empirical as well as definitive therapy. Developing local evidence on the cause and management should be a priority to improve health outcomes in CAP.

Evaluation of the Accelerate Pheno System for Rapid Identification and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Positive Blood Culture Bottles Inoculated with Primary Sterile Specimens from Patients with Suspected Severe Infections

The Accelerate Pheno system is approved for rapid identification and phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) of microorganisms grown from positive blood cultures inoculated with blood from septic patients. We evaluated the performance of the system for identification and AST from positive blood culture bottles inoculated with primary sterile nonblood specimens from patients with suspected severe infections. One hundred positive blood culture bottles with primary sterile specimens (63 cerebrospinal fluids, 16 ascites, 7 pleural fluids, 4 vitreous fluids, 5 joint aspirates, and 5 other aspirates) from 100 patients were included. Pathogen identification was in agreement with conventional methods for 72 of 100 cultures (72%) and for 81 of 112 (72%) pathogens when considering all pathogens and for 72 of 92 (78%) cultures and 81 of 104 (78%) pathogens when considering on-panel pathogens only. Eight of 31 isolates (26%) not identified by APS were pathogens not included in the APS panel. APS and conventional methods accordingly identified all pathogens from two of nine polymicrobial cultures (22%). APS generated antimicrobial resistance results for 57 pathogens of 57 cultures. The overall category agreement between APS and culture-based AST was 91.2%; and the rate for minor errors was 6.9%, for major was 1.7%, and for very major errors was 0.2%. APS may accelerate pathogen identification and phenotypic AST from positive blood culture bottles inoculated with primary sterile specimens from patients with serious infections, especially for hospitals without an on-site microbiology laboratory. However, the inclusion of nonblood specimens with a high likelihood of polymicrobial infections may result in an inferior performance.

Advances in pleural infection and malignancy

Pleural infection and malignancy are among the most common causes of pleural disease and form the mainstay of pleural practice. There has been significant research and increase in scientific understanding in these areas in the past decade. With regard to pleural infection, the rising incidence remains worrying. An increased awareness allowing earlier diagnosis, earlier escalation of therapy and the use of validated risk stratification measures may improve outcomes. In pleural malignancy, research has enabled clinicians to streamline patient pathways with focus on reducing time to diagnosis, definitive management of malignant pleural effusion and achieving these with the minimum number of pleural interventions. Trials comparing treatment modalities of malignant pleural effusion continue to highlight the importance of patient choice in clinical decision-making. This article aims to summarise some of the most recent literature informing current practice in these two areas.

Identification of Microbiome Etiology Associated With Drug Resistance in Pleural Empyema

Identification of the offending organism and appropriate antimicrobial therapy are crucial for treating empyema. Diagnosis of empyema is largely obscured by the conventional bacterial cultivation and PCR process that has relatively low sensitivity, leading to limited understanding of the etiopathogenesis, microbiology, and role of antibiotics in the pleural cavity. To expand our understanding of its pathophysiology, we have carried out a metagenomic snapshot of the pleural effusion from 45 empyema patients by Illumina sequencing platform to assess its taxonomic, and antibiotic resistome structure. Our results showed that the variation of microbiota in the pleural effusion is generally stratified, not continuous. There are two distinct microbiome clusters observed in the forty-five samples: HA-SA type and LA-SA type. The categorization is mostly driven by species composition: HA-SA type is marked by Staphylococcus aureus as the core species, with other enriched 6 bacteria and 3 fungi, forming a low diversity and highly stable microbial community; whereas the LA-SA type has a more diverse microbial community with a distinct set of bacterial species that are assumed to be the oral origin. The microbial community does not shape the dominant antibiotic resistance classes which were common in the two types, while the increase of microbial diversity was correlated with the increase in antibiotic resistance genes. The existence of well-balanced microbial symbiotic states might respond differently to pathogen colonization and drug intake. This study provides a deeper understanding of the pathobiology of pleural empyema and suggests that potential resistance genes may hinder the antimicrobial therapy of empyema.

Diagnosis of pleural empyema/parapneumonic effusion by next-generation sequencing

BACKGROUND

Although a microbiological diagnosis of pleural infection is clinically important, it is often complicated by prior antibiotic treatment and/or difficulties with culturing some bacterial species. Therefore, we aimed to identify probable causative bacteria in pleural empyema/parapneumonic effusions by combining 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene amplification and next-generation sequencing (NGS).

METHODS

Pleural fluids were collected from 19 patients with infectious effusions and nine patients with non-infectious malignant effusions. We analysed DNA extracted from the pleural fluid supernatant by NGS using the Genome Search Toolkit and GenomeSync database, either directly or after PCR amplification of the 16S rRNA gene. Infectious and non-infectious effusions were distinguished by semi-quantitative PCR of the 16S rRNA gene.

RESULTS

Only 8 (42%) effusions were culture-positive, however, NGS of the 16S rRNA gene amplicon identified 14 anaerobes and 7 aerobes/facultative anaerobes in all patients, including Streptococcus sp. (n = 6), Fusobacterium sp. (n = 5), Porphyromonas sp. (n = 5), and Prevotella sp. (n = 4), accounting for >10% of the total genomes. The culture and NGS results were discordant for 3 out of 8 patients, all of whom had previously been treated with antibiotics. Total (2^ΔCT value in semi-quantitative PCR of the 16S rRNA gene) and specific (total bacterial load multiplied by the proportion of primary bacteria in NGS) bacterial loads could efficiently distinguish empyema/parapneumonic effusion from non-infectious effusion.

CONCLUSION

Combining NGS with semi-quantitative PCR can facilitate the diagnosis of pleural empyema/parapneumonic effusion and its causal bacteria.

Applicability and performance of EUCAST's rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (RAST) on primarily sterile body fluids in blood culture bottles in laboratory routine with total lab automation

Optimisation of microbiological diagnostics in primarily sterile body fluids is required. Our objective was to apply EUCAST’s RAST on primarily sterile body fluids in blood culture bottles with total lab automation (TLA) and to compare results to our reference method Vitek2 in order to report susceptibility results earlier. Positive blood culture bottles (BACTEC™ Aerobic/Anaerobic/PEDS) inoculated with primarily sterile body fluids were semi-automatically subcultured onto Columbia 5% SB agar, chocolate agar, MacConkey agar, Schaedler/KV agar and Mueller-Hinton agar. On latter, cefoxitin, ampicillin, vancomycin, piperacillin/tazobactam, meropenem and ciprofloxacin were added. After 6 h, subcultures and RAST were imaged and MALDI-TOF MS was performed. Zone sizes were digitally measured and interpreted following RAST breakpoints for blood cultures. MIC values were determined using Vitek2 panels. During a 1-year period, 197 Staphylococcus aureus, 91 Enterococcus spp., 38 Escherichia coli, 11 Klebsiella pneumoniae and 8 Pseudomonas aeruginosa were found. Categorical agreement between RAST and MIC was 96.5%. Comparison showed no very major errors, 2/7 (28.6%) and 1/7 (14.3%) of major errors for P. aeruginosa and meropenem and ciprofloxacin, 1/9 (11.1%) for K. pneumoniae and ciprofloxacin, 4/69 (7.0%) and 3/43 (5.8%) for Enterococcus spp. and vancomycin and ampicillin, respectively. Minor errors for P. aeruginosa and meropenem (1/8; 12.8%) and for E. coli and ciprofloxacin (2/29; 6.5%) were found. 30/550 RAST measurements were within area of technical uncertainty. RAST is applicable and performs well for primarily sterile body fluids in blood culture bottles, partially better than blood-based RAST. Official EUCAST evaluation is needed.

How a discerning cytological examination can aid in the diagnosis of infectious diseases: case reports

Infections caused by uncommon and resistant pathogens in unusual sites have been increasingly reported in medical literature. We describe four cases of rare cytological findings and clinical impact for patients. In the first case, Aspergillus sp and Pneumocystis jirovecii were observed in the bronchoalveolar lavage of a patient with severe systemic lupus. In the second and third cases, we describe the presence of Trichomonas sp and Strongyloides sp larvae in samples of pleural and peritoneal fluid, respectively. The fourth report is about a patient with a wrist subcutaneous nodule whose synovial aspiration and cytology revealed the presence of brown septate hyphae. The early identification of the infectious agent in the cytological examination was essential for the introduction and/or re-adaptation of therapy in the four cases described. Patients in this report were immunocompromised with severe comorbidities, conditions often associated with unfavorable clinical outcomes.

Diagnostics in Pleural Disease

Pleural disease diagnostics represent a sprawling topic that has enjoyed a renaissance in recent years from humble beginnings. Whilst pleural patients are heterogeneous as a population and in the aetiology of the disease with which they present, we provide an overview of the typical diagnostic approach. Pleural fluid analysis is the cornerstone of the diagnostic pathway; however, it has many shortcomings. Strong cases have been made for more invasive upfront investigations, including image-guided biopsies or local anaesthetic thoracoscopy, in selected populations. Imaging can guide the diagnostic process as well as act as a vehicle to facilitate therapies, and this is never truer than with the recent advances in thoracic ultrasound.

Rapid and sensitive identification of pleural and peritoneal infections by droplet digital PCR

Pleural and peritoneal infections cause substantial morbidity and mortality. Traditional diagnostic methods rely on the cultivation of clinical samples, which usually takes days to obtain report and holds a low detection sensitivity. In this study, we evaluated a 5-fluorescent-channel droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) system and 5 assay panels for culture-independent rapid pathogen detections directly from pleural and peritoneal fluid samples. Traditional culture of the same sample was used as reference. A total of 40 pleural fluid samples and 19 peritoneal fluid samples were tested in this study. Twenty-five positives including 4 polymicrobial infections by culture and 26 positives including 11 polymicrobial infections by ddPCR were detected for pleural fluid samples; 14 positives including 2 polymicrobial infections by culture and 15 positives including 3 polymicrobial infections by ddPCR were detected for peritoneal fluid samples. Klebsiella pneumoniae was the most common bacterium detected both in pleural and in peritoneal fluid samples. The sensitivity of the ddPCR assay for pleural and peritoneal fluid samples was 96% (95% confidence interval (CI) = 79.65 to 99.90%) and 92.86% (95% CI = 66.13 to 99.82%), respectively. The turnaround time of the ddPCR assay was approximately 3 h comparing with 38.30 ± 22.44 h for culture-based identifications. Our results demonstrated that the ddPCR assay is a rapid and sensitive method for identifying pathogens responsible for pleural and peritoneal infections and would be a promising approach for early diagnosis and optimizing treatment of infections.

AABIP Evidence-informed Guidelines and Expert Panel Report for the Management of Indwelling Pleural Catheters

BACKGROUND

While the efficacy of Indwelling pleural catheters for palliation of malignant pleural effusions is supported by relatively robust evidence, there is less clarity surrounding the postinsertion management.

METHODS

The Trustworthy Consensus-Based Statement approach was utilized to develop unbiased, scientifically valid guidance for the management of patients with malignant effusions treated with indwelling pleural catheters. A comprehensive electronic database search of PubMed was performed based on a priori crafted PICO questions (Population/Intervention/Comparator/Outcomes paradigm). Manual searches of the literature were performed to identify additional relevant literature. Dual screenings at the title, abstract, and full-text levels were performed. Identified studies were then assessed for quality based on a combination of validated tools. Appropriateness for data pooling and formation of evidence-based recommendations was assessed using predetermined criteria. All panel members participated in development of the final recommendations utilizing the modified Delphi technique.

RESULTS

A total of 7 studies were identified for formal quality assessment, all of which were deemed to have a high risk of bias. There was insufficient evidence to allow for data pooling and formation of any evidence-based recommendations. Panel consensus resulted in 11 ungraded consensus-based recommendations.

CONCLUSION

This manuscript was developed to provide clinicians with guidance on the management of patients with indwelling pleural catheters placed for palliation of malignant pleural effusions. Through a systematic and rigorous process, management suggestions were developed based on the best available evidence with augmentation by expert opinion when necessary. In addition, these guidelines highlight important gaps in knowledge which require further study.

Multiplex bacterial polymerase chain reaction in a cohort of patients with pleural effusion

Background

The identification of the pathogens in pleural effusion has mainly relied on conventional bacterial culture or single species polymerase chain reaction (PCR), both with relatively low sensitivity. We investigated the efficacy of a commercially available multiplex bacterial PCR assay developed for pneumonia to identify the pathogens involved in pleural infection, particularly empyema.

Methods

A prospective, monocentric, observational study including 194 patients with pleural effusion. Patients were evaluated based on imaging, laboratory values, pleura ultrasound and results of thoracentesis including conventional microbiology studies during hospitalisation. Multiplex bacterial PCR (Curetis Unyvero p55) was performed in batch and had no influence on therapeutic decisions.

Results

Overall, there were 51/197 cases with transudate and 146/197 with exudate. In 42% (n = 90/214) there was a clinical suspicion of parapneumonic effusion and the final clinical diagnosis of empyema was made in 29% (n = 61/214) of all cases. The most common microorganisms identified in the cases diagnosed with empyema were anaerobes [31] followed by gram-positive cocci [10] and gram-negative rods [4]. The multiplex PCR assay identified more of the pathogens on the panel than the conventional methods (23.3% (7/30) vs. 6.7% (2/30), p = 0.008).

Conclusion

The multiplex PCR-based assay had a higher sensitivity and specificity than conventional microbiology when only the pathogens on the pneumonia panel were taken into account. A dedicated pleural empyema multiplex PCR panel including anaerobes would be needed to cover most common pathogens involved in pleural infection.

Routine Microbiologic Studies of Pleural Fluid Specimens in Cancer Patients

BACKGROUND

Patients who have pleural effusions typically undergo thoracentesis with examination of pleural fluid in their initial assessment. However, limited data are available on the diagnostic yield of pleural fluid bacterial cultures and fungal and acid-fast bacilli (AFB) smear and cultures in patients with cancer.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients who had new onset pleural effusions and underwent an initial thoracentesis. The primary outcome was diagnostic yield of pleural fluid bacterial cultures and fungal and AFB smear and cultures.

RESULTS

Of 1637 patients, 1547 (94%) had evidence of active malignancy and 1359 (83%) had evidence of metastatic disease. Of the 1637 patients, 542 (33%) had high clinical suspicion of pneumonia within 14 days prior to thoracentesis. Only 14 patients (1.1%) had positive pleural fluid bacterial cultures, and only 6 of these positive cultures met the criteria for true pleural space infection.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of positive results from pleural fluid bacterial, fungal, and AFB in cancer populations is very low. Unless there is a suspicion for infection, microbiological analysis should be ordered selectively.

Diagnosis of severe respiratory infections in immunocompromised patients

An increasing number of critically ill patients are immunocompromised. Acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (ARF), chiefly due to pulmonary infection, is the leading reason for ICU admission. Identifying the cause of ARF increases the chances of survival, but may be extremely challenging, as the underlying disease, treatments, and infection combine to create complex clinical pictures. In addition, there may be more than one infectious agent, and the pulmonary manifestations may be related to both infectious and non-infectious insults. Clinically or microbiologically documented bacterial pneumonia accounts for one-third of cases of ARF in immunocompromised patients. Early antibiotic therapy is recommended but decreases the chances of identifying the causative organism(s) to about 50%. Viruses are the second most common cause of severe respiratory infections. Positive tests for a virus in respiratory samples do not necessarily indicate a role for the virus in the current acute illness. Invasive fungal infections (Aspergillus, Mucorales, and Pneumocystis jirovecii) account for about 15% of severe respiratory infections, whereas parasites rarely cause severe acute infections in immunocompromised patients. This review focuses on the diagnosis of severe respiratory infections in immunocompromised patients. Special attention is given to newly validated diagnostic tests designed to be used on non-invasive samples or bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and capable of increasing the likelihood of an early etiological diagnosis.

Advances in pleural effusion diagnostics

Introduction: Pleural effusion is a common clinical problem. Yet, in a significant proportion of patients (~20%), the cause of pleural effusion remains unknown. Understanding the diagnostic value of pleural fluid tests is crucial for the development of accurate diagnostic models.Areas covered: This paper provides an overview of latest advances in the diagnosis of pleural effusion based on the best evidence available.Expert opinion: For pleural fluid tests to have a good diagnostic value, it is necessary that data obtained from clinical history, physical examination, and radiological studies are correctly interpreted. Thoracentesis and pleural biopsy should always be performed under image guidance to improve its diagnostic sensitivity and prevent complications. Nucleic acid amplification tests, pleural tissue cultures, and collection of pleural fluid in blood culture bottles improve the diagnostic yield of pleural fluid cultures. Although undiagnosed pleural effusions generally have a favorable prognosis, follow-up is recommended to prevent the development of a malignant pleural effusion.

Update in the Management of Pleural Effusions

Pleural effusions are a common clinical problem for the primary care physician. Over the past 10 years, there has been a paradigm shift in the field due to emergence of new evidence, which includes the ubiquitous use of thoracic ultrasound, the reemergence of pleuroscopy as a diagnostic and therapeutic modality, the widespread use of indwelling pleural catheters for malignant pleural effusions, and the evidence-based approach to management of complex parapneumonic effusions. This review focuses on these advancements with an emphasis on practical clinical application.

Interpreting pleural fluid results

Interpreting pleural fluid results correctly requires an awareness of the possible aetiologies of a pleural effusion and an understanding of the reliability of the outcome of each investigation. All results must be interpreted within each different clinical context and knowledge of the pitfalls for each test is necessary when the diagnosis is unclear. This review aims to discuss the common aetiologies of a pleural effusion and some of the pitfalls in interpretation that can occur when the diagnosis is unclear.

Emerging concepts in pleural infection

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Pleural infection remains an important pulmonary disease, causing significant morbidity and mortality. There is a resurgence of disease burden despite introduction of antibiotics and pneumococcal vaccines. A revisit of the pathogenesis and update on intervention may improve the care of pleural infection.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies have uncovered the prognostic implication of the presence of a pleural effusion in patients with pneumonia. Identifying where the bacteria lives may have diagnostic and therapeutic implications. Over-exaggerated pleural inflammation may underlie development of parapneumonic effusion as indirect evidence and a randomized study in children raised a role of corticosteroids in parapneumonic pleural effusions, but data are lacking for adults. Optimization of the delivery regimen of intrapleural fibrinolytic and deoxyribonuclease therapy is ongoing.

SUMMARY

The review aims to review the current practice and explore new directions of treatment on pleural infection.

Pleural infection: a closer look at the etiopathogenesis, microbiology and role of antibiotics

INTRODUCTION

Pleural infection is a condition that continues to pose a significant challenge to respiratory physicians. We hypothesize that the main barriers to progress include limited understanding of the etiopathogenesis, microbiology,and role of antibiotics in the pleural space. Areas covered: PubMed was searched for articles related to adult pleural infection using the terms 'pleural infection', 'empyema' and 'parapneumonic'. The search focused on relevant literature within the last 10 years, with any older citations used only to display context or lack of progress. Tuberculous pleural infection was excluded. We chose to give specific attention to the etiopathogenesis of pleural infection, including recent advances in diagnostics and biomarkers. We discuss our understanding of the pleural microbiome and rationalize the current use of antibiotics in treating this condition. Expert commentary: Understanding of key events in the development of this condition remains limited. The microbiology is unique compared to the lung, and highly variable. Higher culture yields from pleural biopsy may add new insights into the etiopathogenesis. There is little evidence into achievable effective antibiotic concentration within the pleura. Research into issues including the relevance of biofilm formation and significance of pleural thickening is necessary for treatment progress.

Recent developments in the management of pleural infection: A comprehensive review

OBJECTIVES

Pleural infection is a condition commonly encountered by the respiratory physician. This review aims to provide the reader with an update on the most recent data regarding the epidemiology, microbiology, and the management of pleural infection.

DATA SOURCE

Medline was searched for articles related to pleural infection using the terms "pleural infection," "empyema," and "parapneumonic." The search was limited to the years 1997-2017. Only human studies and reports in English were included.

RESULTS

A rise in the incidence of pleural infection is seen worldwide. Despite the improvement in healthcare practices, the mortality from pleural infection remains high. The role of oral microflora in the etiology of pleural infection is firmly established. A concise review of the recent insights on the pathogenesis of pleural infections is presented. A particular focus is made on the role of tPA, DNAse and similar substances and their interaction with inflammatory cells and how this affects the pathogenesis and treatment of pleural infection.

CONCLUSION

Pleural infection is a common disease with significant morbidity and mortality, as well as a considerable economic burden. The role of medical management is expanding thanks to the widespread use of newer treatments.

A Pilot Feasibility Study in Establishing the Role of Ultrasound-Guided Pleural Biopsies in Pleural Infection (The AUDIO Study)

BACKGROUND

Pleural infection is a common complication of pneumonia associated with high mortality and poor clinical outcome. Treatment of pleural infection relies on the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics because reliable pathogen identification occurs infrequently. We performed a feasibility interventional clinical study assessing the safety and significance of ultrasound (US)-guided pleural biopsy culture to increase microbiological yield. In an exploratory investigation, the 16S ribosomal RNA technique was applied to assess its utility on increasing speed and accuracy vs standard microbiological diagnosis.

METHODS

Twenty patients with clinically established pleural infection were recruited. Participants underwent a detailed US scan and US-guided pleural biopsies before chest drain insertion, alongside standard clinical management. Pleural biopsies and routine clinical samples (pleural fluid and blood) were submitted for microbiological analysis.

RESULTS

US-guided pleural biopsies were safe with no adverse events. US-guided pleural biopsies increased microbiological yield by 25% in addition to pleural fluid and blood samples. The technique provided a substantially higher microbiological yield compared with pleural fluid and blood culture samples (45% compared with 20% and 10%, respectively). The 16S ribosomal RNA technique was successfully applied to pleural biopsy samples, demonstrating high sensitivity (93%) and specificity (89.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings demonstrate the safety of US-guided pleural biopsies in patients with pleural infection and a substantial increase in microbiological diagnosis, suggesting potential niche of infection in this disease. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction primer assessment of pleural fluid and biopsy appears to have excellent sensitivity and specificity.

Bacteriology and clinical outcomes of patients with culture-positive pleural infection in Western Australia: A 6-year analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Pleural infection is a clinical challenge; its microbiology can be complex. Epidemiological and outcome data of pleural infection in adult Australians are lacking. We describe the bacteriology and clinical outcomes of Australian adults with culture-positive pleural infection (CPPI) over a 6-year period.

METHODS

Cases with CPPI were identified through Western Australian public hospitals electronic record. Culture isolates, admission dates, vital status, co-morbidities, radiology, blood and pleural fluid tests were extracted.

RESULTS

In total, 601 cases (71.4% males; median age: 63 years (IQR: 50-74); median hospital stay 13 days) involving 894 bacterial isolates were identified. Hospital-acquired (HA)-CPPI was defined in 398 (66.2%) cases, community-acquired (CA)-CPPI in 164 (27.3%) cases and the remaining classified as oesophageal rupture/leak. Co-morbidities, most frequently cancer, were common (65.2%). Radiological evidence of pneumonia was present in only 43.8% of CA-CPPI and 27.3% of HA-CPPI. Of the 153 different bacterial strains cultured, Streptococcus species (32.9%) especially viridans streptococci group were most common in CA-CPPI, whereas HA-CPPI was most often associated with Staphylococcus aureus (11.6%) and Gram-negative (31.9%) infections. Mortality was high during hospitalization (CA-CPPI 13.4% vs HA-CPPI 16.6%; P = 0.417) and at 1 year (CA-CPPI 32.4% vs HA-CPPI 45.5%; P = 0.006).

CONCLUSION

This is the first large multicentre epidemiological study of pleural infection in Australian adults and includes the largest cohort of HA-CPPI published to date. CPPI is caused by a diverse range of organisms which vary between CA and HA sources. CPPI is a poor prognostic indicator both in the short term and in the subsequent 12 months.

A Guide to Utilization of the Microbiology Laboratory for Diagnosis of Infectious Diseases: 2018 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the American Society for Microbiology

The critical nature of the microbiology laboratory in infectious disease diagnosis calls for a close, positive working relationship between the physician/advanced practice provider and the microbiologists who provide enormous value to the healthcare team. This document, developed by experts in laboratory and adult and pediatric clinical medicine, provides information on which tests are valuable and in which contexts, and on tests that add little or no value for diagnostic decisions. This document presents a system-based approach rather than specimen-based approach, and includes bloodstream and cardiovascular system infections, central nervous system infections, ocular infections, soft tissue infections of the head and neck, upper and lower respiratory infections, infections of the gastrointestinal tract, intra-abdominal infections, bone and joint infections, urinary tract infections, genital infections, and other skin and soft tissue infections; or into etiologic agent groups, including arthropod-borne infections, viral syndromes, and blood and tissue parasite infections. Each section contains introductory concepts, a summary of key points, and detailed tables that list suspected agents; the most reliable tests to order; the samples (and volumes) to collect in order of preference; specimen transport devices, procedures, times, and temperatures; and detailed notes on specific issues regarding the test methods, such as when tests are likely to require a specialized laboratory or have prolonged turnaround times. In addition, the pediatric needs of specimen management are also emphasized. There is intentional redundancy among the tables and sections, as many agents and assay choices overlap. The document is intended to serve as a guidance for physicians in choosing tests that will aid them to quickly and accurately diagnose infectious diseases in their patients.

Risk Stratification in Patients with Complicated Parapneumonic Effusions and Empyema Using the RAPID Score

PURPOSE

Complicated parapneumonic effusions and empyema are a leading cause of morbidity in the United States with over 1 million admissions annually and a mortality rate that remains high in spite of recent advances in diagnosis and treatment. The identification of high risk patients is crucial for improved management and the provision of cost-effective care. The RAPID score is a scoring system comprised of the following variables: renal function, age, purulence, infection source, and dietary factors and has been shown to predict outcomes in patients with pleural space infections.

METHODS

In a single center retrospective study, we evaluated 98 patients with complicated parapneumonic effusions and empyema who had tube thoracostomy (with or without Intrapleural fibrinolytic therapy) and assessed treatment success rates, mortality, length of hospital stay, and direct hospitalization costs stratified by three RAPID score categories: low-risk (0-2), medium risk (3-4), and high-risk (5-7) groups.

RESULTS

Treatment success rate was 71%, and the 90 day mortality rate was 12%. There was a positive-graded association between the low, medium and high RAPID score categories and mortality, (5.3%, 8.3% and 22.6%, respectively), length of hospital stay (10, 21, 19 days, respectively), and direct hospitalization costs ($19,909, $36,317 and $43,384, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that the RAPID score is a robust tool which could be used to identify patients with complicated parapneumonic effusions and empyema who may be at an increased risk of mortality, prolonged hospitalization, and who may incur a higher cost of treatment. Randomized controlled trials identifying the most effective initial treatment modality for medium- and high-risk patients are needed.