Effect of lung transplantation on diaphragmatic function in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Impact of unilateral diaphragm elevation on postoperative outcomes in bilateral lung transplantation - a retrospective single-center study

This study evaluated the impact of unilateral diaphragm elevation following bilateral lung transplantation on postoperative course. Patient data for all lung transplantations performed at our institution between 01/2010 and 12/2019 were reviewed. Presence of right or left diaphragm elevation was retrospectively evaluated using serial chest X-rays performed while patients were standing and breathing spontaneously. Right elevation was defined by a > 40 mm difference between right and left diaphragmatic height. Left elevation was present if the left diaphragm was at the same height or higher than the right diaphragm. In total, 1093/1213 (90%) lung transplant recipients were included. Of these, 255 (23%) patients exhibited radiologic evidence of diaphragm elevation (right, 55%; left 45%; permanent, 62%). Postoperative course did not differ between groups. Forced expiratory volume in 1 second, forced vital capacity and total lung capacity were lower at 1-year follow-up in patients with permanent than in patients with transient or absent diaphragmatic elevation (P = 0.038, P < 0.001, P = 0.002, respectively). Graft survival did not differ between these groups (P = 0.597). Radiologic evidence of diaphragm elevation was found in 23% of our lung transplant recipients. While lung function tests were worse in patients with permanent elevation, diaphragm elevation did not have any relevant impact on outcomes.

The Efficacy of Outpatient Pulmonary Rehabilitation After Bilateral Lung Transplantation

PURPOSE

Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is advocated in the pre- and post-lung transplantation (LTx) periods. However, there is limited literature on the benefit of PR post-LTx. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of an outpatient, multidisciplinary, comprehensive PR program in bilateral LTx recipients in the early period after LTx.

METHOD

Twenty-three LTx recipients were referred to the PR center. Change in incremental and endurance shuttle walk tests, hand and quadriceps strength, respiratory muscle strength (maximum inspiratory/expiratory pressure), dyspnea (Medical Research Council score), quality of life (St George's Respiratory Questionnaire, Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire), and psychological status (Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale) were compared pre- and post-PR.

RESULTS

Seventeen of 23 (74%) recipients completed PR, comprising 15 male and 2 female patients whose median age was 51 yr. The initiation of the program was 75 ± 15 d after LTx. The incremental shuttle walk test distance was predicted as 23% before PR and it increased to 36% after PR (P < .001); the endurance shuttle walk test distance also increased (P < .01). Significant improvement was seen in upper and lower extremity strength, and St George's Respiratory Questionnaire and Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire scores and Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale scores reflected less anxiety and depressive symptoms. Furthermore, body mass and fat-free mass indices, maximum inspiratory pressure, and maximum expiratory pressure improved significantly. There was no significant change in forced expiratory volume in the first second of expiration, forced vital capacity, or Medical Research Council scores.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that patients who attended PR within 3 mo of bilateral LTx showed improvements in exercise capacity, respiratory muscle strength, quality of life, body composition, and psychological status.

Respiratory Muscle and Lung Function in Lung Allograft Recipients: Association with Exercise Intolerance

BACKGROUND

In lung transplant recipients (LTRs), restrictive ventilation disorder may be present due to respiratory muscle dysfunction that may reduce exercise capacity. This might be mediated by pro-inflammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and interleukin-6 (IL-6).

OBJECTIVE

We investigated lung respiratory muscle function as well as circulating pro-inflammatory cytokines and exercise capacity in LTRs.

METHODS

Fifteen LTRs (6 female, age 56 ± 14 years, 63 ± 45 months post-transplantation) and 15 healthy controls matched for age, sex, and body mass index underwent spirometry, measurement of mouth occlusion pressures, diaphragm ultrasound, and recording of twitch transdiaphragmatic (twPdi) and gastric pressures (twPgas) following magnetic stimulation of the phrenic nerves and the lower thoracic nerve roots. Exercise capacity was quantified using the 6-min walking distance (6MWD). Plasma IL-6 and TNF-α were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays.

RESULTS

Compared with controls, patients had lower values for forced vital capacity (FVC; 81 ± 30 vs.109 ± 18% predicted, p = 0.01), maximum expiratory pressure (100 ± 21 vs.127 ± 17 cm H2O, p = 0.04), diaphragm thickening ratio (2.2 ± 0.4 vs. 3.0 ± 1.1, p = 0.01), and twPdi (10.4 ± 3.5 vs. 17.6 ± 6.7 cm H2O, p = 0.01). In LTRs, elevation of TNF-α was related to lung function (13 ± 3 vs. 11 ± 2 pg/mL in patients with FVC ≤80 vs. >80% predicted; p < 0.05), and lung function (forced expiratory volume after 1 s) was closely associated with diaphragm thickening ratio (r = 0.81; p < 0.01) and 6MWD (r = 0.63; p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

There is marked restrictive ventilation disorder and respiratory muscle weakness in LTRs, especially inspiratory muscle weakness with diaphragm dysfunction. Lung function impairment relates to elevated levels of circulating TNF-α and diaphragm dysfunction and is associated with exercise intolerance.

The impaired diaphragmatic function after bilateral lung transplantation: A multifactorial longitudinal study

BACKGROUND

Lung transplantation is a complex but effective treatment of end-stage pulmonary disease. Among the post-operative complications, phrenic nerve injury, and consequent diaphragmatic dysfunction are known to occur but are hitherto poorly described. We aimed to investigate the effect of lung transplantation on diaphragmatic function with a multimodal approach.

METHODS

A total of 30 patients were studied at 4 time points: pre-operatively, at discharge after surgery, and after approximately 6 and subsequently 12 months post surgery. The diaphragmatic function was studied in terms of geometry (assessed by the radius of the diaphragmatic curvature delineated on chest X-ray), weakness (considering changes in forced vital capacity when the patient shifted from upright to supine position), force (maximal pressure during sniff), mobility (excursion of the dome of the diaphragm delineated by ultrasound), contractility (thickening fraction assessed by ultrasound), electrical activity (latency and area of compound muscle action potential during electrical stimulation of phrenic nerve), and kinematics (relative contribution of the abdominal compartment to tidal volume).

RESULTS

Despite good clinical recovery (indicated by spirometry and 6 minutes walking test), a reduction of the diaphragmatic function was detected at discharge; it persisted 6 months later to recover fully 1 year after transplantation. Diaphragmatic dysfunction was demonstrated in terms of force, weakness, electrical activity, and kinematics. Our data suggest that the dysfunction was caused by phrenic nerve neurapraxia or moderate axonotmesis, potentially as a consequence of the surgical procedure (i.e., the use of ice and pericardium manipulation).

CONCLUSIONS

The occurrence of diaphragmatic dysfunction in patients with a good clinical recovery indicates that the evaluation of diaphragmatic function should be included in the post-operative assessment after lung transplantation.

ULTRASONIC ASSESSMENT OF DIAPHRAGM CONDITION OF THE PATIENTS, WHO PASSED THE SELECTION FOR LUNG VOLUME REDUCTION SURGERY

The article showed the results of ultrasonic assessment of topographic and functional diaphragm indices in patients with severe diffuse emphysema. They passed the selection for lung volume reduction surgery. The comparison of diaphragm indices was presented in patients with diffuse emphysema and control group of healthy volunteers. Dynamics of diaphragm condition was studied after surgical treatment. There wasn’t noted any statistical difference of diaphragm topographic indices as compared with the control group. There wasn’t shown a correlation between respiratory function indices and functional diaphragm indices, but it was noted a positive tendency in characteristics during quiet breathing.

Lung transplant

The ICU period is only one time point among many in the complex, multidisciplinary postoperative management required for patient survival and improved QOL. The care required on step-down units and after discharge to home each has unique care aspects that impact successful patient outcomes.

Lung transplantation and lung volume reduction surgery

Since the publication of the last edition of the Handbook of Physiology, lung transplantation has become widely available, via specialized centers, for a variety of end-stage lung diseases. Lung volume reduction surgery, a procedure for emphysema first conceptualized in the 1950s, electrified the pulmonary medicine community when it was rediscovered in the 1990s. In parallel with their technical and clinical refinement, extensive investigation has explored the unique physiology of these procedures. In the case of lung transplantation, relevant issues include the discrepant mechanical function of the donor lungs and recipient thorax, the effects of surgical denervation, acute and chronic rejection, respiratory, chest wall, and limb muscle function, and response to exercise. For lung volume reduction surgery, there have been new insights into the counterintuitive observation that lung function in severe emphysema can be improved by resecting the most diseased portions of the lungs. For both procedures, insights from physiology have fed back to clinicians to refine patient selection and to scientists to design clinical trials. This section will first provide an overview of the clinical aspects of these procedures, including patient selection, surgical techniques, complications, and outcomes. It then reviews the extensive data on lung and muscle function following transplantation and its complications. Finally, it reviews the insights from the last 15 years on the mechanisms whereby removal of lung from an emphysema patient can improve the function of the lung left behind.

Transplantation in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Lung transplantation is a surgical option for patients who fail optimization of medical treatment for the severe symptoms that result from COPD. This review will discuss patient selection, transplant listing, and the surgical technique for transplantation in COPD. Furthermore, it will describe transplant outcomes and its effects on recipient survival, pulmonary function, exercise capacity, respiratory muscle function, and quality of life. The respective roles of transplantation and lung volume reduction surgery as therapies for advanced disease will be outlined.

Effect of lung transplant and volume reduction surgery on respiratory muscle function

Lung transplantation and lung volume reduction surgery have opened a new therapeutic era for patients with advanced emphysema. In addition to providing impressive clinical benefits, they have helped us better understand how the chest wall and respiratory muscles adapt to chronic hyperinflation. This article reviews the effects of these procedures on respiratory muscle and chest wall function. Inspiratory (including diaphragm) and expiratory muscle strength are often close to normal after unilateral and bilateral transplantation, although some patients have marked weakness. After bilateral transplantation for emphysema, graft volume is normal at full inflation but remains greater than normal at end expiration, which results from structural changes in the chest wall. In contrast, patients with unilateral transplantation have a reduction in graft volume at full inflation. The mediastinum is displaced toward the graft at end expiration, which reduces the surface area of the diaphragm on the transplanted side, and it moves toward the native lung during tidal and full inspiration and toward the graft during tidal and forced expiration. Lung volume reduction produces an increase in contractility, length and surface area of the diaphragm, and increases its contribution to tidal volume; at the same time, neural drive to the muscle and respiratory load are reduced, such that diaphragm neuromechanical coupling is improved. Diaphragm configuration and rib cage dimensions are only minimally affected by the procedure. Single-lung transplantation and lung volume reduction favorably impact on the disadvantageous size interaction by which the lungs are functionally restricted by the chest wall in emphysema.

Lung transplantation and lung volume reduction surgery versus transplantation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Lung transplantation and lung volume reduction surgery are surgical options for patients with advanced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease that is refractory to medical treatment. In this review, we discuss the differential indications for each procedure, as well as compare their risks and benefits. We also present an algorithm for selecting the most appropriate procedure for individual patients. Finally, we discuss the feasibility and role of lung transplantation after lung volume reduction surgery in the management of selected patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Increased diaphragmatic strength and tolerance to fatigue after bilateral lung transplantation: an electromyographic study

We evaluated the diaphragmatic function of seven patients with severe chronic respiratory failure before and after a bilateral lung transplantation (BLT), with follow-up at one year of pulmonary function tests, maximal inspiratory mouth pressure (MIP) and surface diaphragmatic electromyogram (Edi). The patients were asked to sustain target inspiratory pressures at -15, -30, and -50 cmH(2)O. We measured the endurance time (Tlim) to sustain inspiratory efforts and the power spectrum density function of Edi at each inspiratory maneuver. The Edi power spectra was analysed in terms of median frequency (MF), total power (TP) and energies in high-and low-frequency bands (EL and EH). Before BLT, a defect of the diaphragmatic function was evident: MIP was 62+/-7% of the predicted value and the Tlim measured at each inspiratory effort was very short ( 13+/-1 s, 10+/-1 s and 8+/-1 s at pressures of -15, -30, and -50 cmH(2)O, respectively). One month after BLT, the Tlim began to increase at all target inspiratory pressures and at 6 months MIP recovered to normal values. One month after BLT, there was a significant decrease in TP measured at the beginning of each inspiratory efforts and also an increase in the concomitant MF value. BLT markedly accentuated the maximal variations of TP, MF and low-frequency Edi energy. Some hypotheses are raised to explain this dramatic improvement in diaphragmatic function after BLT.

Disorders of the respiratory muscles

The act of breathing depends on coordinated activity of the respiratory muscles to generate subatmospheric pressure. This action is compromised by disease states affecting anatomical sites ranging from the cerebral cortex to the alveolar sac. Weakness of the respiratory muscles can dominate the clinical manifestations in the later stages of several primary neurologic and neuromuscular disorders in a manner unique to each disease state. Structural abnormalities of the thoracic cage, such as scoliosis or flail chest, interfere with the action of the respiratory muscles-again in a manner unique to each disease state. The hyperinflation that accompanies diseases of the airways interferes with the ability of the respiratory muscles to generate subatmospheric pressure and it increases the load on the respiratory muscles. Impaired respiratory muscle function is the most severe consequence of several newly described syndromes affecting critically ill patients. Research on the respiratory muscles embraces techniques of molecular biology, integrative physiology, and controlled clinical trials. A detailed understanding of disease states affecting the respiratory muscles is necessary for every physician who practices pulmonary medicine or critical care medicine.

Muscle metabolism and exercise tolerance in COPD

This article explores the hypothesis that dyspnea in patients with COPD arises from an imbalance between the load placed on the respiratory muscle pump and its capacity. Evidence to support this concept is presented, and possible therapeutic approaches are discussed.

Respiratory muscle function and drive in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Respiratory, and particularly inspiratory, muscle function is altered in COPD. Many of these alterations are secondary to a mechanical disadvantage related to hyperinflation. Other factors, including corticosteroid therapy and nutritional depletion, are also deleterious to muscle function. In addition, the load imposed on the respiratory muscles is increased in COPD. Combined with the altered respiratory muscle function, this increase induces important changes in respiratory muscle drive and recruitment. Moreover, the imbalance between respiratory muscle function and load is an important determinant of dyspnea and hypercapnia. Because much of the lung and airway derangements are irreversible in COPD, the respiratory muscles appear to be an attractive target for therapeutic interventions.

Lung transplantation for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Lung transplantation is able to provide dramatic gains in pulmonary function to patients with advanced pulmonary emphysema. At the present time, however, transplantation is available to a strictly defined pool of candidates, and outcomes are limited by numerous respiratory and nonrespiratory postoperative complications. Further progress is needed in expanding the supply of donor lungs, minimizing perioperative complications, and optimizing postoperative immunologic management.

Respiratory and limb muscle function in lung allograft recipients

Lung transplantation recipients have reduced exercise capacity despite normal resting pulmonary and hemodynamic function. The limiting factor may be contractile dysfunction of skeletal muscle. To test this postulate, we measured limb and respiratory muscle function in nine clinically stable lung allograft recipients (six men and three women, aged 30 to 65 yr, at 5 to 102 mo after transplantation) with reduced exercise capacity. Respiratory muscle strength was tested by measuring maximal inspiratory and expiratory pressure (MIP and MEP, respectively). Ankle dorsiflexor muscle strength was measured during maximal voluntary contraction (MVC). In a subset of six recipients, we also measured contractile properties and fatigue characteristics of the tibialis anterior muscle, using electrical stimulation of the motor point. Data were compared with values from age- and sex-matched control subjects. MIP values of transplant recipients did not differ from control values; however, MEP was blunted by 30% relative to control (p < 0.05), and MVC was decreased by 39% (p < 0.05). The force-frequency relationships and fatigue characteristics of the tibialis anterior were not different between the patient and control groups. We conclude that stable lung allograft recipients experience expiratory and lower limb weakness that may contribute to exercise intolerance.

Diaphragm dimensions after single-lung transplantation for emphysema

We used three-dimensional reconstructions obtained with spiral computed tomography to measure total diaphragm surface area (Adi), and the surface area of the dome (Ado) and of the zone of apposition (Aap) of the diaphragm in nine patients with single-lung transplantation (SLT) for emphysema and nine normal subjects matched for age, sex, height, and weight. Measurements were obtained at supine FRC, midinspiratory capacity, and TLC. In the normal subjects, Ado and Adi were greater on the right than on the left side, and the right dome was positioned more cranially than the left one, presumably because of the presence of the liver. Compared with either the ipsilateral side in the controls or the native side in the patients, Ado was smaller on the transplanted side because the mediastinum was shifted toward the graft. Adi showed a similar trend. On the other hand, the radius of curvature of the dome in the coronal and sagittal planes was similar on the side of the graft and on the ipsilateral side in the controls. In conclusion, we found that after SLT for emphysema, diaphragm configuration comes back to normal but Ado, and with it Adi, remain smaller than in normal subjects because the mediastinum is displaced toward the graft.

Maximal exercise capacity and peripheral skeletal muscle function following lung transplantation

BACKGROUND

There have been many suggestions that diminished exercise capacity in patients that have undergone lung transplantation is due, in part, to peripheral muscle dysfunction, brought on by either detraining or immunosuppressive therapy. There is limited data quantifying skeletal muscle function in this population, especially in those more than 18 months post-procedure. The present study sought to quantitate skeletal muscle function and cardiopulmonary responses to graded exercise in 19 lung transplant recipients, 15 of which were mostly more than 18 months post-procedure.

METHODS

Ten single- (SLT) and 9 double-lung transplantation (DLT) underwent anthropometric measures and performed expiratory spirometry, whole body plethysmography to assess lung volumes, static maximal mouth pressures to assess respiratory muscle strength, progressive exercise testing on a cycle ergometer (with cardiac output measurements being performed every second workload) and isokinetic cycling to assess peripheral muscle power and work capacity.

RESULTS

The DLT group was younger than the SLT group (23.0 [21.0-32.0] vs 47.5 [43.0-55.0] median [interquartile range], p < .05) with no differences in height, weight, or BMI. Despite the DLT group having significantly better spirometric values (FEV1: 86% vs 56.5% median) and less airtrapping (RV/TLC: 30% vs 53.5%), both groups were equally limited in exercise capacity (Wmax)(38.0 percent predicted [30.0-65.0] vs 37.5 percent predicted [30.0-44.0], SLT vs DLT), leg power (76.1 percent predicted [53.8-81.4] vs 69.0 percent predicted [58.3-76.0]) and leg work capacity (63.3 percent predicted [34.7-66.8] vs 38.4 percent predicted [27.5-57.3]). This lack of difference in performance persisted when the analysis was limited to those more than 18 months post-procedure. Respiratory muscle strength was also not different for the two groups, and was within normal limits. Wmax was best correlated with leg work capacity (r = .84), but also with leg power, RV/TLC, FEV1 (r = .49, -.52, .58). When normalized for age, height, and sex, percent predicted Wmax only correlated with percent predicted leg work capacity (r = .58). Cardiac output was appropriate for the work performed.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that peripheral skeletal muscle work capacity is reduced following lung transplantation and mostly responsible for the limitation of exercise performance. While the causes of muscular dysfunction have yet to be clarified, the preservation of respiratory muscle strength with the concomitant reduction in leg power and work capacity suggests that most of the muscular dysfunction post-transplantation is attributable to detraining.

Improved lung function and quality of life following increased elastic recoil after lung volume reduction surgery in emphysema

Lung volume reduction surgery for severe emphysema with removal of 20-30% of the most destroyed parts of the lung parenchyma has been reported to improve lung function substantially. Increased elastic recoil has been suggested as one underlying mechanism for the improvement. Fourteen patients, seven men and seven women with a mean age of 62 years, who underwent bilateral lung volume reduction surgery have been followed up for 3 months. We here report the data on quality of life, lung function and elastic recoil. FEV1.0 increased by a mean of 26% from 0.581 to 0.731 (P < 0.01). The mean TLC was reduced by 16% from 8.91 to 7.51 (P < 0.001). The level of hyperinflation decreased as implied by a reduction in the ratio of RV to TLC from 0.70 to 0.60 (P < 0.001). The pulmonary elastic recoil improved, with an increase in the transpulmonary pressure at maximal inspiration (PelTLC) from 0.95 kPa to 1.35 kPa (P < 0.05) and an average increase in the coefficient of retraction PelTLC/TLC) from 0.12 kPa l-1 to 0.19 kPa l-1 (P < 0.01). The resting PaO2 increased from a mean of 8.7 kPa to 9.8 kPa (P < 0.01). The patients reported a high degree of subjective improvement according to the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire and the working capacity on a bicycle increased by 26% from a mean of 38 W to 48 W (P < 0.01). The promising short-term results of lung volume reduction surgery for severe emphysema appear to be related to improved pulmonary elastic recoil.

Effect of lung volume reduction surgery on neuromechanical coupling of the diaphragm

The mechanisms for symptomatic improvement following lung volume reduction surgery for emphysema are poorly understood. We hypothesized that enhanced neuromechanical coupling of the diaphragm is an important factor in this improvement. We studied seven patients with diffuse emphysema before and 3 mo after surgery. Patients showed improvements in 6-min walking distance (p = 0.002) and dyspnea (p = 0.04). The pressure output of the respiratory muscles, quantified as pressure-time product per minute (PTP/min), decreased after surgery (p = 0.03), as did PaCO2 (p = 0.02). Maximal transdiaphragmatic pressures (Pdi(max)) increased from 80.3 +/- 9.5 (SE) to 110.8 +/- 9.3 cm H2O after surgery (p = 0.03), and the twitch transdiaphragmatic pressure response to phrenic nerve stimulation (Pdi(tw)) increased from 17.2 +/- 2.4 to 25.9 +/- 3.0 cm H2O (p = 0.02); these increases were greater than could be accounted for by a decrease in lung volume. The contribution of the diaphragm to tidal breathing, assessed by relative changes in gastric and transdiaphragmatic pressures, increased after surgery (p = 0.008). Net diaphragmatic neuromechanical coupling, quantified as the quotient of tidal volume (normalized to total lung capacity) to tidal change in Pdi (normalized to Pdi(max)), improved after surgery (p = 0.03) and was related to the increase in 6-min walking distance (r = 0.86, p = 0.03) and decrease in dyspnea (r = 0.76, p = 0.08). In conclusion, lung volume reduction surgery effects an improvement in diaphragmatic function, greater than can be accounted for by a decrease in operating lung volume, and enhances diaphragmatic neuromechanical coupling.

Changes in ventilatory mechanics and diaphragmatic function after lung volume reduction surgery in patients with COPD

BACKGROUND

Lung volume reduction (LVR) has recently been used to treat severe emphysema. About 25% of the volume of each lung is removed with this method. Little is known about the mechanism of functional improvement so a study was undertaken to investigate the changes in ventilatory mechanics and diaphragmatic function in eight patients after LVR.

METHODS

Measurements of work of breathing (WOB), intrinsic positive end expiratory pressure (PEEPi), dynamic compliance (Cdyn), and arterial carbon dioxide tension (PaCO2) were performed on the day before surgery and daily for seven days after surgery, as well as one, three, and six months after surgery. All measurements were performed on spontaneously breathing patients, simultaneously assessing oesophageal pressure via an oesophageal balloon catheter and air flow via a tightly adjusted mask. Diaphragmatic function was evaluated by measuring oesophageal and transdiaphragmatic pressure (Pdi) preoperatively and at one, three, and six months postoperatively.

RESULTS

Mean forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) was 23 (3.6)% predicted, and all patients were oxygen dependent before the-operation. One day after LVR the mean decrease in WOB was 0.93 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.46 to 1.40) joule/l, the mean decrease in PEEPi was 0.61 (95% CI 0.35 to 0.87) kPa, and the mean increase in Cdyn was 182.5 (95% CI 80.0 to 284.2) ml/kPa. Similar changes were found seven days and six months after surgery. PaCO2 was higher on the day after the operation but was significantly reduced six months later. Pdi was increased three and six months after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Ventilatory mechanics improved immediately after LVR, probably by decompression of lung tissue and relief of thoracic distension. An improvement in diaphragmatic function three and six months postoperatively also contributes to improved respiratory function after LVR.

Anaesthesia for patients after lung transplantation

PURPOSE

The purpose of this article is to review the literature on post lung transplant patients presenting for surgery and anaesthesia and to provide insight into their perioperative management.

SOURCE

Articles and books were identified via a Medline search and through a review of the bibliographies of these sources.

PRINCIPLE FINDINGS

Single and double lung transplantation is becoming more common and the period of survival is increasing. As a result, more of these patients are presenting for surgery and anaesthesia. Also, it is increasingly likely that these patients may present, either for emergency or elective surgery, to anaesthetists with limited experience in this field. These patients have considerable medical, physiological and pharmacological problems which need to be understood.

CONCLUSION

Anaesthesia, local, regional, or general, can be safely delivered to these patients provided that the physiology and pathophysiology of the transplanted lung, the pharmacology of the immunosuppressive agents, and the underlying surgical condition are understood.

Comparison of early functional results after volume reduction or lung transplantation for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

BACKGROUND

Bilateral lung volume reduction is designed to improve pulmonary function in selected patients with severe emphysema by improving diaphragmatic and chest wall mechanics. Early results of lung volume reduction suggest significant improvement to selected patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, some of whom might otherwise be considered for lung transplantation. The purpose of this review was to compare intermediate results of volume reduction with single and bilateral lung transplantation.

METHODS

Functional performance and survival after volume reduction were compared with single and bilateral sequential lung transplantation. After evaluation, patients were enrolled in a supervised intensive preoperative and postoperative program of pulmonary rehabilitation. Functional assessment, including pulmonary function tests, room air arterial blood gas analysis, and 6-minute walk distance, was obtained before the operation and 3, 6, and 12 months after the operation.

RESULTS

Thirty-three patients underwent volume reduction (mean age 57 years), 39 patients single lung transplantation (55 years), and 27 patients bilateral lung transplantation (49 years). Early mortality was 0, 1 of 39, and 2 of 25 and mortality at 12 months was 1 of 33, 4 of 39, and 4 of 25 in the volume reduction, single, and bilateral lung transplantation groups, respectively. At 6 months, mean forced expiratory volume in 1 second was improved by 79% (volume reduction), by 231% (single lung transplantation), and by 498% (bilateral lung transplantation) over preoperative values. Exercise endurance as measured by 6-minute walk distance increased by 28% (volume reduction), by 47% (single lung transplantation), and by 79% (bilateral lung transplantation) from baseline. At 6 months, all patients having single or bilateral lung transplantation and 26 of 33 patients having volume replacement were free of supplemental oxygen.

CONCLUSIONS

Although single and bilateral lung transplantation result in superior lung function, volume reduction achieves satisfactory improvement of disabling symptoms early after operation while avoiding immunosuppression and transplant-specific complications. Our experience suggests that (1) volume reduction is a suitable alternative in selected patients eligible for transplantation; (2) volume reduction provides an earlier option for treatment in patients who may require transplantation at some future date; (3) volume reduction is the only surgical treatment available to the many patients who are not current or future transplant candidates. Conversely, in patients not suitable for volume reduction, transplantation remains the only choice for surgical therapy.