Minimisation of aminoglycoside toxicity in patients with cystic fibrosis

Interventions for the eradication of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in people with cystic fibrosis

BACKGROUND

Cystic fibrosis is an inherited recessive disorder of chloride transport that is characterised by recurrent and persistent pulmonary infections from resistant organisms that result in lung function deterioration and early mortality in sufferers. Meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has emerged not only as an important infection in people who are hospitalised, but also as a potentially harmful pathogen in cystic fibrosis. Chronic pulmonary infection with MRSA is thought to confer on people with cystic fibrosis a worse clinical outcome and result in an increased rate of lung function decline. Clear guidance for MRSA eradication in cystic fibrosis, supported by robust evidence, is urgently needed. This is an update of a previous review.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness of treatment regimens designed to eradicate MRSA and to determine whether the eradication of MRSA confers better clinical and microbiological outcomes for people with cystic fibrosis. To ascertain whether attempts at eradicating MRSA can lead to increased acquisition of other resistant organisms (including Pseudomonas aeruginosa), increased adverse effects from drugs, or both.

SEARCH METHODS

We identified randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials by searching the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders (CFGD) Group's Cystic Fibrosis Trials Register, PubMed, MEDLINE and three clinical trials registries; by handsearching article reference lists; and through contact with experts in the field. We last searched the CFGD Group's Cystic Fibrosis Trials Register on 4 October 2021, and the ongoing trials registries on 31 January 2022.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-RCTs of any combinations of topical, inhaled, oral or intravenous antimicrobials primarily aimed at eradicating MRSA compared with placebo, standard treatment or no treatment.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane and used the GRADE methodology to assess the certainty of the evidence.

MAIN RESULTS

The review includes three RCTs with 135 participants with MRSA infection. Two trials compared active treatment versus observation only and one trial compared active treatment with placebo.  Active treatment versus observation In both trials (106 participants), active treatment consisted of oral trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole combined with rifampicin. One trial administered this combination for two weeks alongside nasal, skin and oral decontamination and a three-week environmental decontamination, while the second trial administered this drug combination for 21 days with five days intranasal mupirocin. Both trials reported successful eradication of MRSA in people with cystic fibrosis, but they used different definitions of eradication. One trial (45 participants) defined MRSA eradication as negative MRSA respiratory cultures at day 28, and reported that oral trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole combined with rifampicin may lead to a higher proportion of negative cultures compared to control (odds ratio (OR) 12.6 (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.84 to 55.84; low-certainty evidence). However, by day 168 of follow-up, there was no difference between groups in the proportion of participants who remained MRSA-negative (OR 1.17, 95% CI 0.31 to 4.42; low-certainty evidence). The second trial defined successful eradication as the absence of MRSA following treatment in at least three cultures over a period of six months. We are uncertain if the intervention led to results favouring the treatment group as the certainty of the evidence was very low (OR 2.74, 95% CI 0.64 to 11.75). There were no differences between groups in the remaining outcomes for this comparison: quality of life, frequency of exacerbations or adverse effects (all low-certainty evidence) or the change from baseline in lung function or weight (both very low-certainty evidence). The time until next positive MRSA isolate was not reported. The included trials found no differences between groups in terms of nasal colonisation with MRSA. While not a specific outcome of this review, investigators from one study reported that the rate of hospitalisation from screening through day 168 was lower with oral trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole combined with rifampicin compared to control (rate ratio 0.22, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.72; P = 0.01). Nebulised vancomycin with oral antibiotics versus nebulised placebo with oral antibiotics The third trial (29 participants) defined eradication as a negative respiratory sample for MRSA at one month following completion of treatment. No differences were reported in MRSA eradication between treatment arms (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.14 to 7.39; low-certainty evidence). No differences between groups were seen in lung function or adverse effects (low-certainty evidence), in quality of life (very low-certainty evidence) or nasal colonisation with MRSA. The trial did not report on the change in weight or frequency of exacerbations.  AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Early eradication of MRSA is possible in people with cystic fibrosis, with one trial demonstrating superiority of active MRSA treatment compared with observation only in terms of the proportion of MRSA-negative respiratory cultures at day 28. However, follow-up at three or six months showed no difference between treatment and control in the proportion of participants remaining MRSA-negative. Moreover, the longer-term clinical consequences - in terms of lung function, mortality and cost of care - remain unclear. Using GRADE methodology, we judged the certainty of the evidence provided by this review to be very low to low, due to potential biases from the open-label design, high rates of attrition and small sample sizes. Based on the available evidence, we believe that whilst early eradication of respiratory MRSA in people with cystic fibrosis is possible, there is not currently enough evidence regarding the clinical outcomes of eradication to support the use of the interventions studied.

Defining the Importance of Age-Related Changes in Drug Clearance to Optimizing Aminoglycoside Dosing Regimens for Adult Patients with Cystic Fibrosis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The number of adults living with cystic fibrosis (CF) has increased and will continue to do so with the approval of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulators. Because systemic aminoglycosides are commonly administered for CF pulmonary exacerbations, we sought to define optimized dosing regimens using a population pharmacokinetic modeling and simulation approach.

METHODS

Adult CF patients admitted for pulmonary exacerbation, receiving at least 72 h of systemic gentamicin, tobramycin, or amikacin, with measured concentrations were included. Covariates [e.g., age, weight, creatinine clearance (CRCL)] were screened. Population modeling was completed using Monolix, and simulations were conducted in R. Simulated exposures were calculated using noncompartmental analysis. Once-daily fixed (10 mg/kg) and exposure-matched dosing (i.e., 15, 10, 7.5, 6 mg/kg for ages 20, 30, 40, and 50 years, respectively) strategies were compared. First-24 h exposures were evaluated for each strategy according to the probability of target attainment (PTA) (ratio of peak plasma concentrations relative to the minimum inhibitory concentration [C_max/MIC] or ratio of the area under the concentration-time curve to MIC [AUC/MIC]) and the probability of toxic exposure (PTE) (trough concentration, C_trough > 2 mg/l).

RESULTS

Forty-eight adult patients (55% female) were included. A one-compartment model best fit the data. Estimates for volume of distribution (V) and clearance (CL) were 22 l and 5.57 l/h, respectively. Weight significantly modified CL and V. Age significantly modified CL and was more influential than CRCL. PTA was > 90% at MICs ≤ 1 mg/l for fixed doses of 10 mg/kg and for exposure-matched doses at MIC ≤ 1 mg/l. Exposure-matched dosing reduced PTE roughly 50% in patients aged 40 and 50 years vs. fixed dosing.

CONCLUSIONS

Exposure-matching maintained PTA at MICs ≤ 1 mg/l while reducing toxicity risk in older patients compared to fixed dosing. Confirmatory studies are needed.

Once-daily versus multiple-daily dosing with intravenous aminoglycosides for cystic fibrosis

BACKGROUND

People with cystic fibrosis, who are chronically colonised with the organism Pseudomonas aeruginosa, often require multiple courses of intravenous aminoglycoside antibiotics for the management of pulmonary exacerbations. The properties of aminoglycosides suggest that they could be given in higher doses less often. This is an update of a previously published review.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness and safety of once-daily versus multiple-daily dosing of intravenous aminoglycoside antibiotics for the management of pulmonary exacerbations in cystic fibrosis.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cystic Fibrosis Specialist Register held at the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group's editorial base, comprising references identified from comprehensive electronic database searches, handsearching relevant journals and handsearching abstract books of conference proceedings.Date of the most recent search: 31 January 2019.We also searched online trial registries. Date of latest search: 25 February 2019.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled trials, whether published or unpublished, in which once-daily dosing of aminoglycosides has been compared with multiple-daily dosing in terms of efficacy or toxicity or both, in people with cystic fibrosis.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The two authors independently selected the studies to be included in the review and assessed the risk of bias of each study; authors also assessed the quality of the evidence using the GRADE criteria. Data were independently extracted by each author. Authors of the included studies were contacted for further information. As yet unpublished data were obtained for one of the included studies.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 15 studies for possible inclusion in the review. Five studies reporting results from a total of 354 participants (aged 5 to 50 years) were included in this review. All studies compared once-daily dosing with thrice-daily dosing. One cross-over trial had 26 participants who received the first-arm treatment but only 15 received the second arm. One study had a low risk of bias for all criteria assessed; the remaining included studies had a high risk of bias from blinding, but for other criteria were judged to have either an unclear or a low risk of bias.There was little or no difference between treatment groups in: forced expiratory volume in one second, mean difference (MD) 0.33 (95% confidence interval (CI) -2.81 to 3.48, moderate-quality evidence); forced vital capacity, MD 0.29 (95% CI -6.58 to 7.16, low-quality evidence); % weight for height, MD -0.82 (95% CI -3.77 to 2.13, low-quality evidence); body mass index, MD 0.00 (95% CI -0.42 to 0.42, low-quality evidence); or in the incidence of ototoxicity, relative risk 0.56 (95% CI 0.04 to 7.96, moderate-quality evidence). Once-daily treatment in children probably improved the percentage change in creatinine, MD -8.20 (95% CI -15.32 to -1.08, moderate-quality evidence), but showed no difference in adults, MD 3.25 (95% CI -1.82 to 8.33, moderate-quality evidence). The included trials did not report antibiotic resistance patterns or quality of life.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Once- and three-times daily aminoglycoside antibiotics appear to be equally effective in the treatment of pulmonary exacerbations of cystic fibrosis. There is evidence of less nephrotoxicity in children.

Eradication therapy for Burkholderia cepacia complex in people with cystic fibrosis

BACKGROUND

Chronic infection with Burkholderia cepacia complex species remains a significant problem for clinicians treating people with cystic fibrosis. Colonisation with Burkholderia cepacia complex species is linked to a more rapid decline in lung function and increases morbidity and mortality. There remain no objective guidelines for strategies to eradicate Burkholderia cepacia complex in cystic fibrosis lung disease, as these are inherently resistant to the majority of antibiotics and there has been very little research in this area. This review aims to examine the current treatment options for people with cystic fibrosis with acute infection with Burkholderia cepacia complex and to identify an evidence-based strategy that is both safe and effective. This is an updated version of the review.

OBJECTIVES

To identify whether treatment of Burkholderia cepacia complex infections can achieve eradication, or if treatment can prevent or delay the onset of chronic infection. To establish whether following eradication, clinical outcomes are improved and if there are any adverse effects.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis Trials Register, compiled from electronic database searches and handsearching of journals and conference abstract books. We also searched the reference lists of relevant articles and reviews.Last search: 12 March 2019.We also searched electronic clinical trials registers for the USA and Europe.Date of last search: 12 March 2019.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised or quasi-randomised studies in people with cystic fibrosis of antibiotics or alternative therapeutic agents used alone or in combination, using any method of delivery and any treatment duration, to eradicate Burkholderia cepacia complex infections compared to another antibiotic, placebo or no treatment.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed for inclusion in the review the eligibility of 52 studies (79 references) identified by the search of the Group's Trial Register and the other electronic searches.

MAIN RESULTS

No studies looking at the eradication of Burkholderia cepacia complex species were identified.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The authors have concluded that there was an extreme lack of evidence in this area of treatment management for people with cystic fibrosis. Without further comprehensive studies, it is difficult to draw conclusions about a safe and effective management strategy for Burkholderia cepacia complex eradication in cystic fibrosis. Thus, while the review could not offer clinicians evidence of an effective eradication protocol for Burkholderia cepacia complex, it has highlighted an urgent need for exploration and research in this area, specifically the need for well-designed multi-centre randomised controlled studies of a variety of (novel) antibiotic agents.

Treatment for chronic methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus pulmonary infection in people with cystic fibrosis

BACKGROUND

Cystic fibrosis is an inherited life-threatening multisystem disorder with lung disease characterized by abnormally thick airway secretions and persistent bacterial infection. Chronic, progressive lung disease is the most important cause of morbidity and mortality in the condition and is therefore the main focus of clinical care and research. Staphylococcus aureus is a major cause of chest infection in people with cystic fibrosis. Early onset, as well as chronic, lung infection with this organism in young children and adults results in worsening lung function, poorer nutrition and increases the airway inflammatory response, thus leading to a poor overall clinical outcome. There are currently no evidence-based guidelines for chronic suppressive therapy for Staphylococcus aureus infection in cystic fibrosis such as those used for Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection. This is an update of a previously published review.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the evidence regarding the effectiveness of long-term antibiotic treatment regimens for chronic infection with methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) infection in people with cystic fibrosis and to determine whether this leads to improved clinical and microbiological outcomes.

SEARCH METHODS

Trials were identified by searching the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group's Cystic Fibrosis Trials Register, MEDLINE, Embase, handsearching article reference lists and through contact with local and international experts in the field. Date of the last search of the Group's Cystic Fibrosis Trials Register: 09 February 2018.We also searched ongoing trials databases. Date of latest search: 20 May 2018.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials comparing any combinations of topical, inhaled, oral or intravenous antimicrobials used as suppressive therapy for chronic infection with methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus compared with placebo or no treatment.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The authors independently assessed all search results for eligibility. No eligible trials were identified.

MAIN RESULTS

The searches identified 58 trials, but none were eligible for inclusion in the current version of this review.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

No randomised controlled trials were identified which met the inclusion criteria for this review. Although methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus is an important and common cause of lung infection in people with cystic fibrosis, there is no agreement on how best to treat long-term infection. The review highlights the need to organise well-designed trials that can provide evidence to support the best management strategy for chronic methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus infection in people with cystic fibrosis.

Interventions for the eradication of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in people with cystic fibrosis

BACKGROUND

Cystic fibrosis is an inherited recessive disorder of chloride transport that is characterised by recurrent and persistent pulmonary infections from resistant organisms that result in lung function deterioration and early mortality in sufferers.Meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has emerged as, not only an important infection in people who are hospitalised, but also as a potentially harmful pathogen in cystic fibrosis. Chronic pulmonary infection with MRSA is thought to confer people with cystic fibrosis with a worse clinical outcome and result in an increased rate of lung function decline. Clear guidance for MRSA eradication in cystic fibrosis, supported by robust evidence, is urgently needed. This is an update of a previous review.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness of treatment regimens designed to eradicate MRSA and to determine whether the eradication of MRSA confers better clinical and microbiological outcomes for people with cystic fibrosis. To ascertain whether attempts at eradicating MRSA can lead to increased acquisition of other resistant organisms (including P aeruginosa) or increased adverse effects from drugs, or both.

SEARCH METHODS

Randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials were identified by searching the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group's Cystic Fibrosis Trials Register, PubMed, MEDLINE, clinical trial registries (Clinicaltrials.gov, WHO ICTRP, ISRCTN Registry), handsearching article reference lists and through contact with experts in the field.Date of the last search of the Group's Cystic Fibrosis Trials Register: 27 July 2017.Ongoing trials registries were last searched: 07 August 2017.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials comparing any combinations of topical, inhaled, oral or intravenous antimicrobials with the primary aim of eradicating MRSA compared with placebo, standard treatment or no treatment.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The authors independently assessed all search results for eligibility. They used the GRADE methodology to assess the quality of the evidence.

MAIN RESULTS

The review includes two trials with a total of 106 participants with MRSA infection. In both trials the active treatment was oral trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole combined with rifampicin; however, one trial administered this combination for two weeks alongside nasal, skin and oral decontamination and a three-week environmental decontamination, while the second trial administered this drug combination for 21 days with five days intranasal mupirocin. In both trials the control arm was observation only.Both trials reported successful eradication of MRSA in people with CF as an outcome; however, the definition used for MRSA eradication differed. The first trial (n = 45) defined MRSA eradication as negative MRSA respiratory cultures at day 28, and reported that, when compared to control, oral trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole combined with rifampicin may lead to a higher proportion of negative cultures, odds ratio (OR) 12.6 (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.84 to 55.84; low-certainty evidence); however, by day 168 of follow-up there was no difference in the proportion of participants who remained MRSA-negative in either treatment arm, OR 1.17 (95% CI 0.31 to 4.42) (low-quality evidence). In the second trial, successful eradication was defined as the absence of MRSA following treatment (oral co-trimoxazole and rifampicin with intranasal mupirocin or observation) in at least three cultures over a period of six months. At the time of reporting, 40 out of 61 participants had completed follow-up, but results showed no difference between groups. Eradication was achieved in 12 out 29 participants (41%) receiving active treatment, and in 9 out of 32 participants (28%) on the observation arm, OR 1.80 (95% CI 0.62 to 5.25) (very low-quality evidence).With regards to this review's secondary outcomes, these were reported in the first trial only. The trial reports that no differences were observed between the two arms in terms of pulmonary exacerbations (from screening to day 28), nasal colonisation, lung function, weight or participant-reported outcomes. While not a specific outcome of this review, investigators reported that the rate of hospitalisation from screening through day 168 was lower with oral trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole combined with rifampicin compared to control, rate ratio 0.22 (95% CI 0.05 to 0.72) (P = 0.0102).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Early eradication of MRSA is possible in people with cystic fibrosis, with one trial demonstrating superiority of active MRSA treatment compared with observation only in terms of the proportion of MRSA-negative respiratory cultures at day 28. However, by six months, the proportion of participants who remained MRSA-negative did not differ between treatment arms in either trial. Moreover, the longer-term clinical consequences in terms of lung function, mortality and cost of care, remain unclear.Using GRADE methodology, we judged the quality of the evidence provided by this review to be very low to low, due to potential biases from the open-label design and unclear detail reported in one trial. Based on the available evidence, it is the opinion of the authors that whilst early eradication of respiratory MRSA in people with cystic fibrosis is possible, there is not currently enough evidence regarding the clinical outcomes of eradication to support the use of the interventions studied.

Once-daily versus multiple-daily dosing with intravenous aminoglycosides for cystic fibrosis

BACKGROUND

People with cystic fibrosis, who are chronically colonised with the organism Pseudomonas aeruginosa, often require multiple courses of intravenous aminoglycoside antibiotics for the management of pulmonary exacerbations. The properties of aminoglycosides suggest that they could be given in higher doses less often. This is an update of a previously published review.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness and safety of once-daily versus multiple-daily dosing of intravenous aminoglycoside antibiotics for the management of pulmonary exacerbations in cystic fibrosis.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cystic Fibrosis Specialist Register held at the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group's editorial base, comprising references identified from comprehensive electronic database searches, handsearching relevant journals and handsearching abstract books of conference proceedings.Date of the most recent search: 24 June 2016.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled trials, whether published or unpublished, in which once-daily dosing of aminoglycosides has been compared with multiple-daily dosing in terms of efficacy or toxicity or both, in people with cystic fibrosis.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The two authors independently selected the studies to be included in the review and assessed the risk of bias of each study; authors also assessed the quality of the evidence using the GRADE criteria. Data were independently extracted by each author. Authors of the included studies were contacted for further information. As yet unpublished data were obtained for one of the included studies.

MAIN RESULTS

Fifteen studies were identified for possible inclusion in the review. Four studies reporting results from a total of 328 participants (aged 5 to 50 years) were included in this review. All studies compared once-daily dosing with thrice-daily dosing. One study had a low risk of bias for all criteria assessed; the remaining three included studies had a high risk of bias from blinding, but for other criteria were judged to have either an unclear or a low risk of bias.There was no significant difference between treatment groups in: forced expiratory volume in one second, mean difference 0.33 (95% confidence interval -2.81 to 3.48, moderate quality evidence); forced vital capacity, mean difference 0.29 (95% confidence interval -6.58 to 7.16, low quality evidence); % weight for height, mean difference -0.82 (95% confidence interval -3.77 to 2.13, low quality evidence); body mass index, mean difference 0.00 (95% confidence interval -0.42 to 0.42, low quality evidence); or in the incidence of ototoxicity, relative risk 0.56 (95% confidence interval 0.04 to 7.96, moderate quality evidence). The percentage change in creatinine significantly favoured once-daily treatment in children, mean difference -8.20 (95% confidence interval -15.32 to -1.08, moderate quality evidence), but showed no difference in adults, mean difference 3.25 (95% confidence interval -1.82 to 8.33, moderate quality evidence). The included trials did not report antibiotic resistance patterns or quality of life.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Once- and three-times daily aminoglycoside antibiotics appear to be equally effective in the treatment of pulmonary exacerbations of cystic fibrosis. There is evidence of less nephrotoxicity in children.

Changes in the inner ear structures in cystic fibrosis patients

OBJECTIVE

Although prolonged use of antibiotics is very common in cystic fibrosis (CF) patients, no studies have assessed the changes in both cochlear and peripheral vestibular systems in this population.

METHODS

We used human temporal bones to analyze the density of vestibular dark, transitional, and hair cells in specimens from CF patients who were exposed to several types of antibiotics, as compared with specimens from an age-matched control group with no history of ear disease or antibiotic use. Additionally, we analyzed the changes in the elements of the cochlea (hair cells, spiral ganglion neurons, and the area of the stria vascularis). Data was gathered using differential interference contrast microscopy and light microscopy.

RESULTS

In the CF group, 83% of patients were exposed to some ototoxic drugs, such as aminoglycosides. As compared with the control group, the density of both type I and type II vestibular hair cells was significantly lower in all structures analyzed; the number of dark cells was significantly lower in the lateral and posterior semicircular canals. We noted a trend toward a lower number of both inner and outer cochlear hair cells at all turns of the cochlea. The number of spiral ganglion neurons in Rosenthal's canal at the apical turn of the cochlea was significantly lower; furthermore, the area of the stria vascularis at the apical turn of the cochlea was significantly smaller.

CONCLUSIONS

Deterioration of cochlear and vestibular structures in CF patients might be related to their exposure to ototoxic antibiotics. Well-designed case-control studies are necessary to rule out the effect of CF itself.

Eradication therapy for Burkholderia cepacia complex in people with cystic fibrosis

BACKGROUND

Chronic infection with Burkholderia cepacia complex species remains a significant problem for clinicians treating people with cystic fibrosis. Colonisation with Burkholderia cepacia complex species is linked to a more rapid decline in lung function and increases morbidity and mortality. There remain no objective guidelines for strategies to eradicate Burkholderia cepacia complex in cystic fibrosis lung disease, as these are inherently resistant to the majority of antibiotics and there has been very little research in this area. This review aims to examine the current treatment options for people with cystic fibrosis with acute of Burkholderia cepacia complex and to identify an evidence-based strategy that is both safe and effective. This is an updated version of the review.

OBJECTIVES

To identify whether treatment of Burkholderia cepacia complex infections can achieve eradication, or if treatment can prevent or delay the onset of chronic infection. To establish whether following eradication, clinical outcomes are improved and if there are any adverse effects.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis Trials Register, compiled from electronic database searches and handsearching of journals and conference abstract books. We also searched the reference lists of relevant articles and reviews.Last search: 14 July 2016.We also searched electronic clinical trials registers for the USA and Europe.Date of last search: 14 July 2016.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised or quasi-randomised studies in people with cystic fibrosis of antibiotics or alternative therapeutic agents used alone or in combination, using any method of delivery and any treatment duration, to eradicate Burkholderia cepacia complex infections compared to another antibiotic, placebo or no treatment.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed for inclusion in the review the eligibility of 50 studies (70 references) identified by the search of the Group's Trial Register and the other electronic searches.

MAIN RESULTS

No studies looking at the eradication of Burkholderia cepacia complex species were identified.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The authors have concluded that there was an extreme lack of evidence in this area of treatment management for people with cystic fibrosis. Without further comprehensive studies, it is difficult to draw conclusions about a safe and effective management strategy for Burkholderia cepacia complex eradication in cystic fibrosis. Thus, while the review could not offer clinicians evidence of an effective eradication protocol for Burkholderia cepacia complex, it has highlighted an urgent need for exploration and research in this area, specifically the need for well-designed multi-centre randomised controlled studies of a variety of (novel) antibiotic agents.

Treatment for chronic methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus pulmonary infection in people with cystic fibrosis

BACKGROUND

Cystic fibrosis is an inherited life-threatening multisystem disorder with lung disease characterized by abnormally thick airway secretions and persistent bacterial infection. Chronic, progressive lung disease is the most important cause of morbidity and mortality in the condition and is therefore the main focus of clinical care and research. Staphylococcus aureus is a major cause of chest infection in people with cystic fibrosis. Early onset, as well as chronic, lung infection with this organism in young children and adults results in worsening lung function, poorer nutrition and increases the airway inflammatory response, thus leading to a poor overall clinical outcome. There are currently no evidence-based guidelines for chronic suppressive therapy for Staphylococcus aureus infection in cystic fibrosis such as those used for Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the evidence regarding the effectiveness of long-term antibiotic treatment regimens for chronic infection with methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) infection in people with cystic fibrosis and to determine whether this leads to improved clinical and microbiological outcomes.

SEARCH METHODS

Trials were identified by searching the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group's Cystic Fibrosis Trials Register, MEDLINE, Embase, handsearching article reference lists and through contact with local and international experts in the field. We also searched ongoing trials databases.Date of the last search of the Group's Cystic Fibrosis Trials Register: 03 March 2016.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials comparing any combinations of topical, inhaled, oral or intravenous antimicrobials used as suppressive therapy for chronic infection with methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus compared with placebo or no treatment.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The authors independently assessed all search results for eligibility. No eligible trials were identified.

MAIN RESULTS

The searches identified 55 trials, but none were eligible for inclusion in the current version of this review.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

No randomised controlled trials were identified which met the inclusion criteria for this review. Although methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus is an important and common cause of lung infection in people with cystic fibrosis, there is no agreement on how best to treat long-term infection. The review highlights the need to organise well-designed trials that can provide evidence to support the best management strategy for chronic methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus infection in people with cystic fibrosis.

Intravenous antibiotics for pulmonary exacerbations in people with cystic fibrosis

BACKGROUND

Cystic fibrosis is a multi-system disease characterised by the production of thick secretions causing recurrent pulmonary infection, often with unusual bacteria. Intravenous antibiotics are commonly used in the treatment of acute deteriorations in symptoms (pulmonary exacerbations); however, recently the assumption that exacerbations are due to increases in bacterial burden has been questioned.

OBJECTIVES

To establish if intravenous antibiotics for the treatment of pulmonary exacerbations in people with cystic fibrosis improve short- and long-term clinical outcomes.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis Trials Register, compiled from electronic database searches and handsearching of journals and conference abstract books. We also searched the reference lists of relevant articles and reviews and ongoing trials registers.Date of last search of Cochrane trials register: 27 July 2015.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials and the first treatment cycle of cross-over studies comparing intravenous antibiotics (given alone or in an antibiotic combination) with placebo, inhaled or oral antibiotics for people with cystic fibrosis experiencing a pulmonary exacerbation.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The authors assessed studies for eligibility and risk of bias and extracted data.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 40 studies involving 1717 participants. The quality of the included studies was largely poor and, with a few exceptions, these comprised of mainly small, inadequately reported studies.When comparing treatment with a single antibiotic to a combined antibiotic regimen, those participants receiving a combination of antibiotics experienced a greater improvement in lung function when considered as a whole group across a number of different measurements of lung function, but with very low quality evidence. When limited to the four placebo-controlled studies (n = 214), no difference was observed, again with very low quality evidence. With regard to the review's remaining primary outcomes, there was no effect upon time to next exacerbation and no studies in any comparison reported on quality of life. There were no effects on the secondary outcomes weight or adverse effects. When comparing specific antibiotic combinations there were no significant differences between groups on any measure. In the comparisons between intravenous and nebulised antibiotic or oral antibiotic (low quality evidence), there were no significant differences between groups on any measure. No studies in any comparison reported on quality of life.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The quality of evidence comparing intravenous antibiotics with placebo is poor. No specific antibiotic combination can be considered to be superior to any other, and neither is there evidence showing that the intravenous route is superior to the inhaled or oral routes. There remains a need to understand host-bacteria interactions and in particular to understand why many people fail to fully respond to treatment.

Interventions for the eradication of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in people with cystic fibrosis

BACKGROUND

Cystic fibrosis is an inherited recessive disorder of chloride transport that is characterised by recurrent and persistent pulmonary infections from resistant organisms that result in lung function deterioration and early mortality in sufferers.Meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has emerged as, not only an important infection in long-term hospitalised patients, but also as a potentially harmful pathogen in cystic fibrosis, and has been increasing steadily in prevalence internationally. Chronic pulmonary infection with MRSA is thought to confer cystic fibrosis patients with a worse overall clinical outcome and, in particular, result in an increased rate of decline in lung function. Clear guidance for the eradication of MRSA in cystic fibrosis, supported by robust evidence from good quality trials, is urgently needed.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness of treatment regimens designed to eradicate MRSA and to determine whether the eradication of MRSA confers better clinical and microbiological outcomes for people with cystic fibrosis.

SEARCH METHODS

Randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials were identified by searching the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group's Cystic Fibrosis Trials Register, PUBMED, MEDLINE, Embase, handsearching article reference lists and through contact with local and international experts in the field.Date of the last search of the Group's Cystic Fibrosis Trials Register: 04 September 2014.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials comparing any combinations of topical, inhaled, oral or intravenous antimicrobials with the primary aim of eradicating MRSA compared with placebo, standard treatment or no treatment.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The authors independently assessed all search results for eligibility. No eligible trials were identified for inclusion.

MAIN RESULTS

No current published eligible trials were identified, although three ongoing clinical trials are likely to be eligible for inclusion in future updates of this review.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We did not identify any randomised trials which would allow us to make any evidence-based recommendations. Although the results of several non-randomised studies would suggest that, once isolated, the eradication of MRSA is possible; whether this has a significant impact on clinical outcome is still unclear. Further research is required to guide clinical decision making in the management of MRSA infection in cystic fibrosis.

Eradication therapy for Burkholderia cepacia complex in people with cystic fibrosis

BACKGROUND

Chronic infection with Burkholderia cepacia complex species remains a significant problem for clinicians treating people with cystic fibrosis. Colonisation with Burkholderia cepacia complex species is linked to a more rapid decline in lung function and increases morbidity and mortality. There remain no objective guidelines for strategies to eradicate Burkholderia cepacia complex in cystic fibrosis lung disease, as these are inherently resistant to the majority of antibiotics and there has been very little research in this area. This review aims to examine the current treatment options for people with cystic fibrosis with acute of Burkholderia cepacia complex and to identify an evidence-based strategy that is both safe and effective.

OBJECTIVES

To identify whether treatment of Burkholderia cepacia complex infections can achieve eradication, or if treatment can prevent or delay the onset of chronic infection. To establish whether following eradication, clinical outcomes are improved and if there are any adverse effects.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis Trials Register, compiled from electronic database searches and handsearching of journals and conference abstract books. We also searched the reference lists of relevant articles and reviews.Last search: 13 January 2014.We also searched electronic clinical trials registers for the USA and Europe.Date of last search: 28 November 2013.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised or quasi-randomised studies in people with cystic fibrosis of antibiotics used alone or in combination, using any method of delivery and any treatment duration, to eradicate Burkholderia cepacia complex infections compared to another antibiotic, placebo or no treatment.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed for inclusion in the review the eligibility of 43 studies (61 references) identified by the search of the Group's Trial Register and the other electronic searches.

MAIN RESULTS

No studies looking at the eradication of Burkholderia cepacia complex species were identified.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The authors have concluded that there was an extreme lack of evidence in this area of treatment management for people with cystic fibrosis. Without further comprehensive studies, it is difficult to draw conclusions about a safe and effective management strategy for Burkholderia cepacia complex eradication in cystic fibrosis. Thus, while the review could not offer clinicians evidence of an effective eradication protocol for Burkholderia cepacia complex, it has highlighted an urgent need for exploration and research in this area, specifically the need for well-designed multi-centre randomised controlled studies of a variety of (novel) antibiotic agents.

Once-daily versus multiple-daily dosing with intravenous aminoglycosides for cystic fibrosis

BACKGROUND

People with cystic fibrosis, who are chronically colonised with the organism Pseudomonas aeruginosa, often require multiple courses of intravenous aminoglycoside antibiotics for the management of pulmonary exacerbations. The properties of aminoglycosides suggest that they could be given in higher doses less often.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness and safety of once-daily versus multiple-daily dosing of intravenous aminoglycoside antibiotics for the management of pulmonary exacerbations in cystic fibrosis.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cystic Fibrosis Specialist Register held at the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group's editorial base, comprising references identified from comprehensive electronic database searches, handsearching relevant journals and handsearching abstract books of conference proceedings.Date of the most recent search: 25 November 2013.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled trials, whether published or unpublished, in which once-daily dosing of aminoglycosides has been compared with multiple-daily dosing in terms of efficacy or toxicity or both, in people with cystic fibrosis.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The two authors independently selected the studies to be included in the review and assessed the risk of bias of each study. Data were independently extracted by each author. Authors of the included studies were contacted for further information. As yet unpublished data were obtained for one of the included studies.

MAIN RESULTS

Fifteen studies were identified for possible inclusion in the review. Four studies reporting results from a total of 328 participants were included in this review. All studies compared once-daily dosing with thrice-daily dosing. One study had a low risk of bias for all criteria assessed; the remaining three included studies had a high risk of bias from blinding, but for other criteria were judged to have either an unclear or a low risk of bias.There was no significant difference between treatment groups in: forced expiratory volume at one second, mean difference 0.33 (95% confidence interval -2.81 to 3.48); forced vital capacity, mean difference 0.29 (95% confidence interval -6.58 to 7.16); % weight for height, mean difference -0.82 (95% confidence interval -3.77 to 2.13); body mass index, mean difference 0.00 (95% confidence interval -0.42 to 0.42); or in the incidence of ototoxicity, relative risk 0.56 (95% confidence interval 0.04 to 7.96). The percentage change in creatinine significantly favoured once-daily treatment in children, mean difference -8.20 (95% confidence interval -15.32 to -1.08), but showed no difference in adults, mean difference 3.25 (95% confidence interval -1.82 to 8.33).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Once- and three-times daily aminoglycoside antibiotics appear to be equally effective in the treatment of pulmonary exacerbations of cystic fibrosis. There is evidence of less nephrotoxicity in children.

Optimization of anti-pseudomonal antibiotics for cystic fibrosis pulmonary exacerbations: V. Aminoglycosides

Intravenous (IV) anti-pseudomonal aminoglycosides (i.e., amikacin and tobramycin) have been shown to be tolerable and effective in the treatment of acute pulmonary exacerbations (APEs) in both pediatric and adult patients with cystic fibrosis. The aim of this review is to provide an evidence-based summary of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic, tolerability, and efficacy studies utilizing IV amikacin, gentamicin, and tobramycin in the treatment of APE and to highlight areas where further investigation is needed. The Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Pulmonary Guidelines recommend that once-daily administration of aminoglycosides is preferred over three times per day in the treatment of an APE. The literature supports dosing ranges for amikacin and tobramycin of 30-35 and 7-15 mg/kg/day, respectively, given once daily, with subsequent doses determined by therapeutic drug concentration monitoring. The literature does not support the routine use of gentamicin in the treatment of APE due to a lack of studies showing efficacy and evidence indicating an increased risk of nephrotoxicity. Further studies are needed to determine the optimal dosing strategy of amikacin in the treatment of an APE, and to further identify risk factors and determinants that influence the development of P. aeruginosa resistance with once-daily administration of tobramycin.

Interventions for the eradication of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in people with cystic fibrosis

BACKGROUND

Cystic fibrosis is an inherited recessive disorder of chloride transport that is characterised by recurrent and persistent pulmonary infections from resistant organisms that result in lung function deterioration and early mortality in sufferers.Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has emerged as, not only an important infection in long-term hospitalised patients, but also as a potentially harmful pathogen in cystic fibrosis, and has been increasing steadily in prevalence internationally. Chronic pulmonary infection with MRSA is thought to confer cystic fibrosis patients with a worse overall clinical outcome and, in particular, result in an increased rate of decline in lung function. Clear guidance for the eradication of MRSA in cystic fibrosis, supported by robust evidence from good quality trials, is urgently needed.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness of treatment regimens designed to eradicate MRSA and to determine whether the eradication of MRSA confers better clinical and microbiological outcomes for people with cystic fibrosis.

SEARCH METHODS

Randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials were identified by searching the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group's Cystic Fibrosis Trials Register, MEDLINE, EMBASE, handsearching article reference lists and through contact with local and international experts in the field.Date of the last search of the Group's Cystic Fibrosis Trials Register: 24 January 2013.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials comparing any combinations of topical, inhaled, oral or intravenous antimicrobials with the primary aim of eradicating MRSA compared with placebo, standard treatment or no treatment.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The authors independently assessed all search results for eligibility. No eligible trials were identified.

MAIN RESULTS

No current published eligible trials were identified, although two ongoing clinical trials are likely to be eligible for inclusion in future updates of this review.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We did not identify any randomised trials which would allow us to make any evidence-based recommendations. Although the results of several non-randomised studies would suggest that, once isolated, the eradication of MRSA is possible; whether this has a significant impact on clinical outcome is still unclear. Further research is required to guide clinical decision making in the management of MRSA infection in cystic fibrosis.

Once-daily versus multiple-daily dosing with intravenous aminoglycosides for cystic fibrosis

BACKGROUND

People with cystic fibrosis, who are chronically colonised with the organism Pseudomonas aeruginosa, often require multiple courses of intravenous aminoglycoside antibiotics for the management of pulmonary exacerbations. The properties of aminoglycosides suggest that they could be given in higher doses less often.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness and safety of once-daily versus multiple-daily dosing of intravenous aminoglycoside antibiotics for the management of pulmonary exacerbations in cystic fibrosis.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cystic Fibrosis Specialist Register held at the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group's editorial base, comprising references identified from comprehensive electronic database searches, handsearching relevant journals and handsearching abstract books of conference proceedings.Date of the most recent search: 29 September 2011.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled trials, whether published or unpublished, in which once-daily dosing of aminoglycosides has been compared with multiple-daily dosing in terms of efficacy or toxicity or both, in people with cystic fibrosis.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The two authors independently selected the studies to be included in the review and assessed methodological quality of each study. Data were independently extracted by each author. Authors of the included studies were contacted for further information. As yet unpublished data were obtained for one of the included studies.

MAIN RESULTS

Sixteen studies were identified for possible inclusion in the review. Four studies reporting results from a total of 328 participants were included in this review. All studies compared once-daily dosing with thrice-daily dosing. There was no significant difference between treatment groups in: forced expiratory volume at one second, mean difference 0.33 (95% confidence interval -2.81 to 3.48); forced vital capacity, mean difference 0.29 (95% confidence interval -6.58 to 7.16); % weight for height, mean difference -0.82 (95% confidence interval -3.77 to 2.13); body mass index, mean difference 0.00 (95% confidence interval -0.42 to 0.42); or in the incidence of ototoxicity, relative risk 0.56 (95% confidence interval 0.04 to 7.96). The percentage change in creatinine significantly favoured once-daily treatment in children, mean difference -8.20 (95% confidence interval -15.32 to -1.08), but showed no difference in adults, mean difference 3.25 (95% confidence interval -1.82 to 8.33).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Once- and three-times daily aminoglycoside antibiotics appear to be equally effective in the treatment of pulmonary exacerbations of cystic fibrosis. There is evidence of less nephrotoxicity in children.

Aminoglycoside antibiotics cochleotoxicity in paediatric cystic fibrosis (CF) patients: A study using extended high-frequency audiometry and distortion product otoacoustic emissions

Despite known ototoxic effects of aminoglycoside (AG) antibiotics, audiological assessment is not routinely undertaken in UK CF patients. Consequently, the incidence of hearing loss is not well established.

OBJECTIVE

To document the incidence of hearing loss in cystic fibrosis (CF) children.

DESIGN

Hearing function of 45 children from Great Ormond Street Hospital was assessed using pure-tone audiometry up to 20kHz and DPOAEs up to 8kHz.

STUDY SAMPLE

39/45 of participants had received intravenous (IV) AGs, 23 of which received repeated IV AGs every 3 months.

RESULTS

In this high exposure group, 8 (21%) had clear signs of ototoxicity; average 8-20kHz thresholds were elevated by ∼50dB and DPOAE amplitudes were >10dB lower at f2 3.2-6.3 kHz. The remaining 31/39 (79%) of AG exposed patients had normal, even exceptionally good hearing. The 21% incidence of ototoxicity we observed is substantial and higher than previously reported. However, our finding of normal hearing in children with equal AG exposure strongly suggests that other unknown factors, possibly genetic susceptibility, influence this outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

We recommend comparable auditory testing in all CF patients with high AG exposures. Genetic analysis may help explain the dichotomy in response to AGs found.

Once-daily versus multiple-daily dosing with intravenous aminoglycosides for cystic fibrosis

BACKGROUND

People with cystic fibrosis, who are chronically colonised with the organism Pseudomonas aeruginosa, often require multiple courses of intravenous aminoglycoside antibiotics for the management of pulmonary exacerbations. The properties of aminoglycosides suggest that they could be given in higher doses less often.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness and safety of once-daily versus multiple-daily dosing of intravenous aminoglycoside antibiotics for the management of pulmonary exacerbations in cystic fibrosis.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cystic Fibrosis Specialist Register held at the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group's editorial base, comprising references identified from comprehensive electronic database searches, handsearching relevant journals and handsearching abstract books of conference proceedings.Date of the most recent search: 19 August 2008.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled trials, whether published or unpublished, in which once-daily dosing of aminoglycosides has been compared with multiple-daily dosing in terms of efficacy or toxicity or both, in people with cystic fibrosis.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The two authors independently selected the studies to be included in the review and assessed methodological quality of each study. Data were independently extracted by each author. Authors of the included studies were contacted for further information. As yet unpublished data were obtained for one of the included studies.

MAIN RESULTS

Thirteen studies were identified for possible inclusion in the review. Four studies reporting results from a total of 328 participants were included in this review. All studies compared once-daily dosing with thrice-daily dosing. There was no significant difference between treatment groups in: forced expiratory volume at one second, mean difference (MD) 0.33 (95% confidence interval (CI) -2.81 to 3.48); forced vital capacity, MD 0.29 (95% CI -6.58 to 7.16); % weight for height, MD -0.82 (95% CI -3.77 to 2.13); body mass index, MD 0.00 (95% CI -0.42 to 0.42); or in the incidence of ototoxicity, relative risk 0.56 (95% CI 0.04 to 7.96). The percentage change in creatinine significantly favoured once-daily treatment in children, MD -8.20 (95% CI -15.32 to -1.08), but showed no difference in adults, MD 3.25 (95% CI -1.82 to 8.33).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Once and three times daily aminoglycoside antibiotics appear to be equally effective in the treatment of pulmonary exacerbations of cystic fibrosis. There is evidence of less nephrotoxicity in children.

[Renal diseases in cystic fibrosis]

Patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) show a continuing improvement in their life expectancy thanks to advances in knowledge of this disorder, allowing better multidisciplinary routine monitoring and earlier therapeutic interventions. Likewise, more than of 40% of these patients are adults and CF is no more only a pediatric disease. Due to their higher life expectancy, CF patients present new and unusual complications that were not recorded before. Among them, some renal disorders have to be added to the CF-related renal diseases. They are due to frequent and prolonged exposure to various potentially nephrotoxic factors that need to be taken into account early enough in order to avoid renal failure : essentially risk factors for kidney stones formation, bacterial infections with their associated immune complexes diseases, nephrotoxic effects of antibiotics, diabetes mellitus. Because we observed a case of IgA glomerulonephritis in a 35-year-old patient with cystic fibrosis, we have searched about all these renal consequences due to this affection and here report them.

Pharmacokinetic profile of once daily intravenous tobramycin in children with cystic fibrosis

AIM

Once-daily tobramycin in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) is a more convenient dosing regimen than thrice daily dosing. There are limited data on the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile for once-daily tobramycin in patients with CF. The aim of this study was to define the PK parameters for once-daily tobramycin in children with CF and develop an algorithm for therapeutic drug monitoring dosing.

METHODS

CF patients admitted to hospital were commenced on once-daily intravenous tobramycin (12 mg/kg/day) and ticarcillin/clavulinic acid. Serum tobramycin levels were taken at 30 min, 2-4 h and 12 h post dose. Data points for the PK model included: age, sex, weight, tobramycin dose, time of tobramycin doses and levels, tobramycin levels. WinNonMix was used to obtain the PK parameters.

RESULTS

Forty-four children with 86 admissions who were aged 9 months-20 years were included. A one-compartment intravenous infusion model with first order elimination kinetics produced the best model. Population parameters were: volume of distribution (V(d)) = 0.267 L/kg (95% confidence interval (CL) 0.260-0.272), clearance (CL) 0.103 L/kg/h (95% CI 0.098-0.107) and half-life (t(1/2)) 1.82 (95% CI 1.77-1.88) h. Once the population model was established post hoc analysis was used to calculate individual subject predictions. Plots of individual prediction curves agreed well with observed values.

CONCLUSION

This study has established an algorithm for routine monitoring of once-daily tobramycin in children with CF. Satisfactory serum levels of tobramycin were obtained with a dose of 12 mg/kg/day and a regimen algorithm that uses only one measurement to monitor the plasma concentration is suggested.

Once-daily versus multiple-daily dosing with intravenous aminoglycosides for cystic fibrosis

BACKGROUND

People with cystic fibrosis, who are chronically colonised with the organism Pseudomonas aeruginosa, often require multiple courses of intravenous aminoglycoside antibiotics for the management of pulmonary exacerbations. The properties of aminoglycosides suggest that they could be given in higher doses less often.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness and safety of once-daily versus multiple-daily dosing of intravenous aminoglycoside antibiotics for the management of pulmonary exacerbations in cystic fibrosis.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cystic Fibrosis Specialist Register held at the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group's editorial base, comprising references identified from comprehensive electronic database searches, handsearching relevant journals and handsearching abstract books of conference proceedings.Date of the most recent search: August 2005.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled trials, whether published or unpublished, in which once-daily dosing of aminoglycosides has been compared with multiple-daily dosing in terms of efficacy and/or toxicity, in people with cystic fibrosis.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The two authors independently selected the studies to be included in the review and assessed methodological quality of each study. Data were independently extracted by each author. Authors of the included studies were contacted for further information. As yet unpublished data were obtained for one of the included studies.

MAIN RESULTS

Eleven studies were identified for possible inclusion in the review. Four studies reporting results from a total of 328 participants were included in this review. All studies compared once-daily dosing with thrice-daily dosing. There was no significant difference between treatment groups in: forced expiratory volume at one second, weighted mean difference (WMD) 0.33 (95% confidence interval (CI) -2.81 to 3.48); forced vital capacity, WMD 0.29 (95% CI -6.58 to 7.16); % weight for height, WMD -0.82 (95% CI -3.77 to 2.13); body mass index, WMD 0.00 (95% CI -0.42 to 0.42); or in the incidence of ototoxicity, relative risk 0.56 (95% CI 0.04 to 7.96). The percentage change in creatinine significantly favoured once-daily treatment in children, WMD -8.20 (95% CI -15.32 to -1.08), but showed no difference in adults, WMD 3.25 (95% CI -1.82 to 8.33).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Once and three times daily aminoglycoside antibiotics appear to be equally effective in the treatment of pulmonary exacerbations of cystic fibrosis. There is evidence of less nephrotoxicity in children.

Comparison of methods of assessment of renal function in cystic fibrosis (CF) patients

Renal failure is increasingly being recognised in CF patients, usually as a consequence of long-term nephrotoxic therapy. There is a need for a simple method of assessment of renal function in this patient group. We compared measured creatinine clearance from validated timed urine collections (the generally accepted practical test of glomerular filtration) with 10 formulae used to estimate creatinine clearance in a group of 74 CF adult patients and 29 matched normal controls. Compared to direct measurement, formulae gave a range of values (95% CI for mean bias -13 to +27.9 ml/min). Even those with the best correlation (r=0.7) gave wide error ranges (limits of agreement: -42.3 to 45.9 ml/min). The most commonly used formulae (Cockroft-Gault [CGF] and abbreviated Modification of Diet in Renal Disease [aMDRD]) were not superior to most other formulae tested. Both CGF and aMDRD-derived estimates compared less favourably in CF patients than controls (mean bias: 9.7 vs 3.4 ml/min (p<0.05) and 4.9 vs 1.4 (p<0.05) respectively; 78% vs 95% (p<0.01) and 77% vs 97% (p<0.01) of estimates within 33% of measurement respectively). In particular, both CGF and aMDRD grossly overestimated renal function (mean bias 18.3 and 15.8 ml/min respectively, p<0.001) in CF patients with reduced creatinine clearance (<80 ml/min). CGF, aMDRD and other formulae cannot be used to reliably assess renal function in CF patients, since they will fail to detect those with renal impairment. Some form of carefully supervised direct measurement is still required.

Pharmacodynamics of tobramycin in patients with cystic fibrosis

Relationships between pharmacodynamic indices (PI), such as the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC)/MIC ratio and time > MIC (T(>MIC)), and efficacy have been described for antimicrobial drugs. The use of these quantitative relationships may increase the power to demonstrate significant effects of drugs, obviating the need to include large numbers in comparative trials. Patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) hospitalized for treatment of an infectious exacerbation due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa were eligible for the study. They received tobramycin 3.3 mg/kg tid as initial therapy in combination with ticarcillin 125 mg/kg qid. Blood samples were drawn at t = 0-8 h after infusion. Pharmocokinetic parameters and PI were calculated for every individual and correlated to the relative improvement in forced expiratory volume during the first second (FEV1) and forced vital capacity (FVC) between pretreatment and days 9-11 as a measure of efficacy. The 3 PI fAUC/MIC, f Peak/MIC, and T(>MIC) of tobramycin showed a significant correlation with effect and was the highest for the fAUC/MIC relationships with FEV1 and FVC as determined both by the Emax model as well as Spearman correlations (r = 0.77, P = 0.002 and 0.58, P = 0.036 for FEV1 and FVC). Pharmacokinetic parameters AUC and Peak as such showed no significant correlation with effect, nor did the MIC values. There is a significant relationship between PI of aminoglycosides and efficacy parameter (increase in FEV1 and FVC) in patients with CF. This study demonstrates the applicability of pharmacodynamic relationships in determining efficacy of antimicrobial therapy, by demonstrating a strong PI-effect relationship in a group of only 13 patients.

Occurrence and risk of cochleotoxicity in cystic fibrosis patients receiving repeated high-dose aminoglycoside therapy

Cystic fibrosis (CF) patients receive repeated courses of aminoglycoside therapy. These patients would consequently be expected to be more susceptible to cochleotoxicity, a recognized side effect with single courses of aminoglycoside therapy. The primary aim of this retrospective study was to establish the incidence and severity of auditory deficit in CF patients. Standard (0.25- to 8-kHz) and high-frequency (10- to 16-kHz) pure-tone audiometry was carried out in 70 CF patients, and the results were compared with the results from 91 control subjects. These subjects were further divided into pediatric and adult groups. Of 70 CF patients, 12 (1 pediatric) displayed hearing loss considered to be caused by repeated exposure to aminoglycosides. There was a nonlinear relationship between the courses of therapy received and the incidence of hearing loss. The severity of the loss did not appear to be related to the number of courses received. Assuming the risk of loss to be independent for each course, preliminary estimates of per course risk of hearing loss were less than 2%. Upon comparison with previous clinical studies and experimental work, these findings suggest that the incidence of cochleotoxicity in CF patients is considerably lower than would be expected, suggesting that the CF condition may confer protection against aminoglycoside cochleotoxicity.

Once daily versus multiple daily dosing with intravenous aminoglycosides for cystic fibrosis

BACKGROUND

Patients with cystic fibrosis, who are chronically colonised with the organism Pseudomonas aeruginosa, often require repeated courses of intravenous aminoglycoside antibiotics for the management of pulmonary exacerbations. The properties of aminoglycosides suggest that they could be given in higher concentrations less often.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness and safety of once-daily versus multiple-daily dosing of intravenous aminoglycoside antibiotics for the management of pulmonary exacerbations in cystic fibrosis.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cystic Fibrosis specialist trials register held at the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group's editorial base, which comprises references identified from comprehensive electronic database searches, handsearching relevant journals and handsearching abstract books of conference proceedings. Date of the most recent search: February 2000.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled trials, whether published or unpublished, in which once-daily dosing of aminoglycosides has been compared with multiple-daily dosing in terms of efficacy and/or toxicity, in patients with cystic fibrosis.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Both reviewers independently extracted data and assessed trial quality. Authors of one study were contacted to obtain missing information.

MAIN RESULTS

Two trials reporting results from a total of 70 patients were included in this review. Both trials compared once-daily dosing with thrice-daily dosing reporting data on Forced Expiratory Volume at one second (FEV1), Forced Vital Capacity (FVC), nutritional status and side effects. There was no significant difference in efficacy or in the incidence of ototoxicity and nephrotoxicity between treatment groups.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Despite a lack of difference between the two groups we feel that these results should be viewed with caution as the numbers of patients involved was small and lacks the power to detect a difference between the groups. This systematic review has highlighted the need for a well designed, adequately-powered, multicentre, randomised controlled trial assessing the efficacy of once-daily versus multiple-daily dosing of intravenous aminoglycosides for pulmonary exacerbations in cystic fibrosis.

Are antipseudomonal antibiotics really beneficial in acute respiratory exacerbations of cystic fibrosis?

BACKGROUND

Although anti-pseudomonal antibiotics are routinely used in the treatment of acute respiratory exacerbations of adult cystic fibrosis (CF), the specific efficacy of such treatment remains uncertain, the mechanism of action of these agents is not fully understood, and the role of sputum susceptibility testing in clinical decision making is controversial.

AIMS

We investigated the relationship between susceptibility testing and clinical outcome in adult CF patients colonised with Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

METHODS

Sputum samples were collected before, during and after respiratory exacerbations from 31 admissions (17 patients). Sputum colony counts and MIC of P. aeruginosa were performed.

RESULTS

Sputum colony counts did not change significantly during or after intravenous (IV) antibiotic therapy. Clinical outcome parameters (lung function, 12-minute walking distance, sputum weight and quality of life) were compared with susceptibility of P. aeruginosa colonies isolated at admission to the antibiotics used, and no correlation was evident. There was no evidence for the development of cross-resistance and there was no change in the proportion of mucoid colonies with therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

While this study has a small patient sample size, it highlights the inconsistency of the role of antipseudomonal drugs also shown in other similar studies. The presence of P. aeruginosa in sputum of acutely ill CF patients prompts us to prescribe i.v. antipseudomonal drugs. If this approach was valid, we would expect to find a reduction in sputum colony counts and improvement in clinical parameters with the use of antibiotics to which the organisms were sensitive. The fact that such a relationship cannot be consistently demonstrated in this and other studies suggests that the use of antipseudomonal therapy in these patients requires more critical bacteriological and clinical evaluation.

Pharmacokinetic optimisation of antibacterial treatment in patients with cystic fibrosis. Current practice and suggestions for future directions

Antibacterials play a central role in the medical management of patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). Administration of adequate dosages of antibacterials results in pronounced beneficial effects on the morbidity and mortality of this patient group. The dosage of the antibacterial that is needed for optimal treatment depends on the individual patient's pharmacokinetics and the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic effect on the micro-organism of relevance in the host. In general, the disposition of antibacterial drugs in patients with CF is not as 'atypical' as once thought. Recent research with adequately matched controls demonstrated that, for a few beta-lactam antibacterials only, a CF-specific increase of the total body clearance seems to exist and that the large volumes of distribution observed are the result of malnutrition and the relative lack of adipose tissue. Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships in patients with CF are less well studied. Apart from the pharmacokinetics, there is a need for optimisation of antibacterial therapy. For the aminoglycosides, pharmacokinetic optimisation based on measured serum drug concentrations is common practice. The Sawchuk-Zaske method based on peak and trough drug concentrations is widely used. A more sophisticated approach is the 'goal-oriented model-based Bayesian adaptive control' method, where integration of mathematically determined optimally (D-optimally) sampled serum drug concentrations and a population model results in the most likely set of individual pharmacokinetic parameter values suitable for further pharmacokinetic optimisation of the therapy. A future development is the integration of changing serum drug concentrations and killing rates of the target micro-organism to a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic surrogate relationship to optimise drug therapy. The latter approach may be extremely useful in deciding on the frequency of aminoglycoside administration as well as the optimal use of the beta-lactam antibacterials and fluoroquinolones.

Changes in MIC alter responses of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to tobramycin exposure

The pharmacokinetic parameters determining antibiotic efficacy are peak concentrations (Cmax), minimum (trough) concentrations (Cmin), and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC). There is general agreement about the importance of Cmax and AUC for aminoglycosides, but this is not so for maintenance of Cmin. With in vitro exposures modelling in vivo administration, Pseudomonas aeruginosa reference strain ATCC 27853 (MIC, 1 mg/liter) and a higher-MIC (relatively resistant) clinical isolate (MIC, 4 mg/liter) were used to explore bacteriostatic and bactericidal outcomes. With P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853, kill followed a complete bolus profile with a 30-min postdistribution peak (Cpeak30) of 10 mg/liter. The clinical isolate required a Cpeak30 bolus profile of 20 mg/liter for kill, and there was no difference between the efficacies of the bolus and infusion exposures. Bolus profiles that were truncated at 8.5 h and producing sublethal effects were then combined with a wide range of Cmins. With a Cpeak30 profile of 8 mg/liter, P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853 showed a graded bacteriostatic response until a Cmin of > or = 0.8 mg/liter, when complete kill resulted. In contrast, bactericidal effects on the clinical isolate required a Cpeak30 profile of 18 mg/liter with a Cmin of > or = 1.0 mg/liter. Therefore, Cmin also contributes to the bactericidal effect of tobramycin, with requirements showing minor variation with change in MIC. Dosing principles for relatively resistant (higher-MIC) organisms are suggested from the data. Relatively higher aminoglycoside doses via infusion regimens are likely to be needed to generate higher peak concentrations and higher AUC values necessary for bactericidal effect in resistant organisms. Maintenance of trough concentrations on the order of 1.0 mg/liter during the interdose interval will tend to guard against the possibility of inadequate peak and AUC exposures for kill.

Loss of spiral ganglion cells as primary manifestation of aminoglycoside ototoxicity

Although pulmonary infections caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa can hardly be eradicated in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF, the most common genetic disease among Caucasians), these patients are mainly treated with intravenous and nebulized tobramycin. Long-term treatment with tobramycin, however, may induce ototoxic effects. We assessed the clinical histories and postmortem temporal bones of six patients with CF for signs of this ototoxicity. Four bones showed typical manifestations of ototoxicity induced by aminoglycosides (AGs): loss of hair cells in the lower turns, and degeneration of ganglion cells. Six bones revealed no loss or scattered loss of hair cells, however, degeneration of the spiral ganglion cells was observed. This suggests that degeneration of the spiral ganglion may occur as a primary manifestation in some cases of ototoxicity due to aminoglycosides. Recent reports have shown that trophic factors (neurotrophins and acidic fibroblast growth factor) interacting with hair cells and the spiral ganglion protect the inner ear from damage. It may be that disturbances in supply of such trophic factors caused degeneration of ganglion cells without loss of hair cells in the cases we studied.