Salbutamol enantiomers: early clinical evidence in humans

Discovery of 7-hydroxyaporphines as conformationally restricted ligands for beta-1 and beta-2 adrenergic receptors

A series of (-)-nornuciferidine derivatives was synthesized and the non-natural enantiomer of the aporphine alkaloid was discovered to be a potent β1- and β2-adrenergic receptor ligand that antagonized isoproterenol and procaterol induced cyclic AMP increases from adenylyl cyclase, respectively. Progressive deconstruction of the tetracyclic scaffold to less complex cyclic and acyclic analogues revealed that the conformationally restricted (6a-R,7-R)-7-hydroxyaporphine 2 (AK-2-202) was necessary for efficient receptor binding and antagonism.

The Principles of Ligand Specificity on beta-2-adrenergic receptor

G protein-coupled receptors are recognized as one of the largest families of membrane proteins. Despite sharing a characteristic seven-transmembrane topology, G protein-coupled receptors regulate a wide range of cellular signaling pathways in response to various physical and chemical stimuli, and prevail as an important target for drug discovery. Notably, the recent progress in crystallographic methods led to a breakthrough in elucidating the structures of membrane proteins. The structures of β₂-adrenergic receptor bound with a variety of ligands provide atomic details of the binding modes of agonists, antagonists and inverse agonists. In this study, we selected four representative molecules from each functional class of ligands and investigated their impacts on β₂-adrenergic receptor through a total of 12 × 100 ns molecular dynamics simulations. From the obtained trajectories, we generated molecular fingerprints exemplifying propensities of protein-ligand interactions. For each functional class of compounds, we characterized and compared the fluctuation of the protein backbone, the volumes in the intracellular pockets, the water densities in the receptors, the domain interaction networks as well as the movements of transmembrane helices. We discovered that each class of ligands exhibits a distinct mode of interactions with mainly TM5 and TM6, altering the shape and eventually the state of the receptor. Our findings provide insightful prospective into GPCR targeted structure-based drug discoveries.

(R)-albuterol for asthma: pro [a.k.a. (S)-albuterol for asthma: con]

Is there scientific evidence to support the replacement of the beta-agonist racemic albuterol with levalbuterol--that is, (R)-albuterol? The argument presented further refines the question as "Do we wish to continue to treat asthma with a mixture of albuterol, of which half is an agent with no known benefit--that is, (S)-albuterol--and which may exacerbate the disease?"

Levosalbutamol in the treatment of asthma

With the exception of levosalbutamol, all of the beta2-agonists that are currently in use are racemic mixtures that are composed in equal amounts of (R)- and (S)-enantiomers. Clinical and mechanistic studies have demonstrated that (R)-salbutamol alone provides the beta2-agonist activity that is needed for the relief of bronchoconstriction, as well as the beta2-adrenergically mediated side effects. (S)-Salbutamol, on the other hand, has minimal binding affinity for the beta2-receptor, indicating that its effects are likely to be mediated through another site. Furthermore, there is evidence that (S)-salbutamol opposes the desirable effects of (R)-salbutamol in the racemic mixture and contributes to the development of characteristic features of asthma, such as airway obstruction, bronchial hyperresponsiveness and airway inflammation. Evidence from clinical studies shows delayed recovery from exacerbation of asthma by patients who are exposed to high concentrations of (S)-salbutamol.

Childhood asthma: breakthroughs and challenges

As we move forward, our goal is to control and eliminate asthma and other allergic disorders. This may come through broadly applied manipulation of environmental, dietary, and infectious risk factors, possibly during the perinatal period. Or we may learn to identify genetically susceptible children and to intervene with individualized genotype-specific treatment before the onset of disease. Maybe we'll learn how to block the mechanisms that give rise to chronic inflammation, or how to subdue Th2 activation. However, as the Swedish proverb says--Don't throw away the old bucket until you know whether the new one holds water. To continue using the old bucket, we have to fix the leaks. One approach to reducing asthma disparities is through traditional disease prevention stages. Primary prevention targets asthma incidence; secondary prevention mitigates established disease and involves disease detection, management, and control; and tertiary prevention is the reduction of complications caused by severe disease. Once causative factors at each level of disease prevention are understood, this knowledge can be translated into clinical practice and public health policy. We need reliable diagnostic criteria to provide correct treatment for infants and toddlers. This will require longitudinal cohort studies supported by assessment of pulmonary function and inflammatory markers. We must find ways to convince more physicians to embrace controller therapy for more severe disease, and to identify the patients with less severe disease who also require ongoing controller therapy. We need to close the gap between what we know and what we do in practice. We need to link basic research to healthcare delivery, and to gain acceptance and support from the intended recipients of new interventions. We need better strategies for improving adherence. We need accountability, foresight, and imagination.

Adverse effects of beta-agonists

Short-acting beta-adrenergic receptor agonists have pharmacologically predictable dose-related and potency-related adverse effects, including tachycardia and tremor, and they also affect serum potassium and glucose. These effects all show tolerance with continued exposure. The potential for arrhythmia is increased by comorbidity and hypoxemia. Nonpharmacologically predictable effects include airway hyperresponsiveness to nonspecific and specific stimuli, including allergen and exercise, and increased airway inflammation. Genetic variants of the beta-adrenergic receptor alter susceptibility to adverse effects of beta-agonists on airway function. The impact of the enantiomers of beta-agonists on adverse effects remains unclear. The two epidemics of asthma death among young people were temporally associated with introduction of potent short-acting beta-agonists (isoproterenol and fenoterol) and appear to be related to adverse effects of these drugs on airway function and airway hyperresponsiveness rather than to cardiotoxicity. Compared with short-acting agents, long-acting beta-agonists show similar but less pronounced pharmacologically predictable effects, and they have not been shown to increase airway hyperresponsiveness in adults. Postmarketing surveillance studies have not suggested significant adverse effects of long-acting beta-agonists on morbidity and mortality.

Enantiomers of bronchodilating beta2-adrenoceptor agonists: is there a cause for concern?

All bronchodilating beta2-adrenoceptor agonists in current clinical use are derivatives of adrenaline and are available as racemates. Whereas the vast majority of the pharmacologic and clinical documentation has been made with the racemates, there are a few studies with the individual enantiomers. It thus appears that all established pharmacologic effects of racemic beta2-agonists reside in the (R)-enantiomer, with the (S)-enantiomer being virtually inactive. In recent years the suspicion has been raised that the (S)-enantiomer of the beta2-agonists is responsible for induction of airway hyperreactivity. This suspicion is based primarily on results obtained in guinea pigs exposed to (S)-enantiomers of beta2-agonists. A number of experiments in vitro have been undertaken to find a mechanism of action for these observations in vivo. Most of the results obtained are equivocal. However, the observation that (S)-salbutamol may cause mobilization of intracellular Ca2+, apparently by means of a cholinergic mechanism, deserves further investigation. The clinical studies are focused on the enantiomers of salbutamol. They confirm the preclinical findings that the pulmonary, as well as the extrapulmonary, effects of salbutamol reside in the (R)-enantiomer. The studies available so far do not convincingly show clinically significant airway hyperreactivity after exposure to the (S)-enantiomer. Further studies are needed to settle this issue.