1
|
Gravgaard AS, Jessen LR, Bjørnvad CR, Heidemann PL, Christensen KJ, Kristensen EKS, Dupont N. Owner expectations regarding antimicrobial prescription for canine acute diarrhea: A prospective observational study from the capital of Denmark. Vet J 2024; 308:106243. [PMID: 39260739 DOI: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2024.106243] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2024] [Revised: 07/23/2024] [Accepted: 09/04/2024] [Indexed: 09/13/2024]
Abstract
Acute diarrhea is a common condition in dogs. Most cases are mild and self-limiting and according to guidelines, antimicrobial treatment is only indicated in dogs with severe systemic disease. However, antimicrobials are still prescribed in 50-65 % of mild cases. Multiple factors have been shown to influence the antimicrobial prescription decision, including perceived pressure from pet owners. This study aimed to investigate dog owners' expectations regarding antimicrobial prescription for dogs with acute diarrhea and the attending veterinarians' perceived owner expectation. To investigate this, a structured telephone interview with owners and a post-consultation questionnaire for the attending veterinarians were conducted. Ninety-nine unique dog-consultations were included with a 91 % owner response rate (n = 90), in these cases 63 % of veterinarians responded (n = 57). Only 6/90 (7 %) owners expressed an expectation of antimicrobial prescription. Of these, two expressed dissatisfaction that antimicrobials were withheld. In 5/57 cases, the attending veterinarian perceived an expectation to prescribe antimicrobials. Three cases aligned with an actual owner expectation, the latter two were pure perception. Eighty percent of owners expressed satisfaction with the consultation in general (n = 72/90), while 16 % (14/90) and 4 % (4/90) expressed minor or major dissatisfaction with non-treatment related issues, respectively. In this study, very few dog owners expressed an expectation of antimicrobials for treatment of acute diarrhea. Likewise, the veterinarians perceived an expectation in only a minority of cases, however, the actual and perceived expectation did not always align. In conclusion, this study suggests that an overall high owner satisfaction is feasible despite a non-antimicrobial approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A S Gravgaard
- Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Dyrlægevej 16, Frederiksberg 1870, Denmark.
| | - L R Jessen
- Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Dyrlægevej 16, Frederiksberg 1870, Denmark
| | - C R Bjørnvad
- Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Dyrlægevej 16, Frederiksberg 1870, Denmark
| | - P L Heidemann
- Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Dyrlægevej 16, Frederiksberg 1870, Denmark
| | - K J Christensen
- Evidensia Karlslunde Dyrehospital, Greve Main 41, Greve 2670, Denmark
| | - E K S Kristensen
- Bella Dyreklinik, Frederikssundsvej 127, København 2700, Denmark
| | - N Dupont
- Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Dyrlægevej 16, Frederiksberg 1870, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Jessen LR, Werner M, Singleton D, Prior C, Foroutan F, Ferran AA, Arenas C, R Bjørnvad C, Lavy E, Allerton F, Allensbach K, Guardabassi L, Unterer S, Bodnárová T, Windahl U, Brennan ML, Weese JS, Scahill K. European Network for Optimization of Veterinary Antimicrobial Therapy (ENOVAT) guidelines for antimicrobial use in canine acute diarrhoea. Vet J 2024; 307:106208. [PMID: 39074542 DOI: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2024.106208] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2024] [Revised: 07/18/2024] [Accepted: 07/23/2024] [Indexed: 07/31/2024]
Abstract
Acute diarrhoea is a common presentation in dogs, and a common reason for antimicrobial prescription and nutraceutical use. This evidence-based guideline provides recommendations for antimicrobial and probiotic treatment of canine acute diarrhoea (CAD). A multidisciplinary panel developed the recommendations by adhering to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework. The opinions of stakeholders (general veterinary practitioners and dog owners) were collected and incorporated to ensure the applicability of this guideline. Four strong recommendations informed by high certainty evidence, and three conditional recommendations informed by very low or low certainty evidence, were drafted by the panel, along with an ungraded section on diagnostic work-up of dogs with acute diarrhoea. The ENOVAT guidelines initiative encourages national or regional guideline makers to use the evidence presented in this document, and the supporting systematic review, to draft national or local guidance documents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L R Jessen
- Department of Veterinary Clinical Science, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg C 1870, Denmark.
| | - M Werner
- Clinic for Small Animal Internal Medicine, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, Zurich 8057, Switzerland
| | - D Singleton
- Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, CH64 7TE, United Kingdom
| | - C Prior
- Willows Veterinary Centre & Referral Centre, Solihull B90 4NH, United Kingdom
| | - F Foroutan
- Faculty of Health Sciences, McMasters University, ON L8S 4L8, Canada
| | - A A Ferran
- INTHERES, Université de Toulouse, INRAE, ENVT, Toulouse 31076, France
| | - C Arenas
- Internal Medicine Service, AniCura Valencia Sur Hospital Veterinario, Valencia 46460, Spain; VetCT Teleconsulting, Cambridge CB30FA, United Kingdom
| | - C R Bjørnvad
- Department of Veterinary Clinical Science, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg C 1870, Denmark
| | - E Lavy
- Koret School of Veterinary Medicine, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Rehovot 76100, Israel
| | - F Allerton
- Willows Veterinary Centre & Referral Centre, Solihull B90 4NH, United Kingdom
| | - K Allensbach
- Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50010, United States
| | - L Guardabassi
- Department of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg C 1870, Denmark
| | - S Unterer
- Clinic for Small Animal Internal Medicine, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, Zurich 8057, Switzerland
| | - T Bodnárová
- Veterinary Clinic Podebrady, Poděbrady 290 01, Czech Republic; Centre for Evidence-based Veterinary Medicine, The University of Nottingham, LE12 5RD, United Kingdom
| | - U Windahl
- Department of Animal Health and Antimicrobial Strategies, National Veterinary Institute (SVA), Uppsala SE-75189, Sweden
| | - M L Brennan
- Centre for Evidence-based Veterinary Medicine, The University of Nottingham, LE12 5RD, United Kingdom
| | - J S Weese
- Department of Pathobiology, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G2W1, Canada
| | - K Scahill
- Evidensia Södra Djursjukhuset Kungens Kurva, Månskärarvägen 13, Kungens Kurva 14175, Sweden; University of Edinburgh, College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, Edinburgh EH16 4SB, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Walker B, Sánchez-Vizcaíno F, Barker EN. Effect of an antimicrobial stewardship intervention on the prescribing behaviours of companion animal veterinarians: A pre-post study. Vet Rec 2022; 190:e1485. [PMID: 35202485 DOI: 10.1002/vetr.1485] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2021] [Revised: 01/06/2022] [Accepted: 02/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Antimicrobial stewardship is a cornerstone of efforts to combat antimicrobial resistance. We evaluated the impact of a formal discussion of antimicrobial stewardship for dogs and cats on systemic antimicrobial prescribing behaviours among companion animal veterinarians. METHODS Electronic health records including information about the prescription of antimicrobials were collected from a multisite UK veterinary practice between 2017 and 2020. We undertook interrupted time series analysis using a quasi-Poisson model to compare the pre- and postintervention change in level and slope for multiple outcomes. RESULTS After the intervention, there were sustained reductions in the prescription rate of cefovecin to cats and metronidazole to dogs and increases in amoxicillin-clavulanic acid prescribing. There was no evidence for an immediate change in overall prescribing rates in either species, although rates increased over the 12 months after the intervention. There was a transient increase in the proportion of dogs who had their weight recorded at the time of prescription. Results suggest decreases in the prescription of off-licence antimicrobials in both species and the likelihood of underdosing in dogs. CONCLUSIONS Discussion of antimicrobial stewardship is more likely to influence the antimicrobial choice than whether to prescribe or not. Interventions may benefit by focusing on appropriate antimicrobial selection rather than overall prescription frequency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ben Walker
- Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, Bristol, UK
| | | | - Emi N Barker
- Bristol Veterinary School, University of Bristol, Langford, Bristol, UK.,Langford Vets, University of Bristol, Langford, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Allerton F, Pouwels KB, Bazelle J, Caddy S, Cauvin A, De Risio L, Swann J, Warland J, Kent A. Prospective trial of different antimicrobial treatment durations for presumptive canine urinary tract infections. BMC Vet Res 2021; 17:299. [PMID: 34488771 PMCID: PMC8422737 DOI: 10.1186/s12917-021-02974-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2021] [Accepted: 07/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Avoidance of unnecessary antimicrobial administration is a key tenet of antimicrobial stewardship; knowing the optimal duration of therapy obviates over-treatment. However, little research has been performed to establish course lengths for common canine infections. In clinical practice, antimicrobial therapy is frequently prescribed in dogs presenting lower urinary tract signs (haematuria, pollakiuria and dysuria/stranguria). The proposed length of treatment in International Consensus guidelines has decreased with each iteration, but these recommendations remain arbitrary and largely extrapolated from experience in people. Methods The objective of this prospective, multi-centre study is to find the shortest course duration that is non-inferior to the standard duration of 7 days of amoxicillin/clavulanate in terms of clinical outcomes for female dogs with lower urinary tract signs consistent with a urinary tract infection. An electronic data capture platform will be used by participating veterinarians working in clinical practice in the United Kingdom. Eligible dogs must be female, aged between 6 months and 10 years and have lower urinary tract signs of up to seven days’ duration. Enrolment will be offered in cases where the case clinician intends to prescribe antimicrobial therapy. Automatic pseudo-randomisation to treatment group will be based on the day of presentation (Monday-Friday); all antimicrobial courses will be completed on the Sunday after presentation generating different treatment durations. Follow-up data will be collected 1, 8 and 22–26 days after completion of the antimicrobial course to ensure effective safety netting, and to monitor short-term outcome and recurrence rates. Informed owner consent will be obtained in all cases. The study is approved by the Ethical Review Board of the University of Nottingham and has an Animal Test Certificate from the Veterinary Medicine’s Directorate. Discussion This study has been designed to mirror current standards of clinical management; conclusions should therefore, be widely applicable and guide practising veterinarians in their antimicrobial decision-making process. A duration-response curve will be created allowing determination of the optimal treatment duration for the management of female dogs with lower urinary tract signs. It is hoped that these results will contribute valuable information to improve future antimicrobial stewardship as part of a wider one-health perspective. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12917-021-02974-y.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fergus Allerton
- Willows Veterinary Centre and Referral Service; part of Linnaeus Veterinary Limited, Highlands Road, Shirley, Solihull, UK.
| | - Koen B Pouwels
- Health Economics Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.,NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infections and Antimicrobial, Oxford, UK.,Resistance at University of Oxford in partnership with Public Health England, Oxford, UK
| | - Julien Bazelle
- Davies Veterinary Specialists; part of Linnaeus Veterinary Limited, Manor Farm Business Park, Higham Gobion, Hitchin, UK
| | - Sarah Caddy
- Cambridge Institute for Therapeutic Immunology and Infectious Disease, Jeffery Cheah Biomedical Centre, Puddicomb Way, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Luisa De Risio
- Linnaeus Veterinary Limited, Friars gate, Shirley, Solihull, UK
| | - James Swann
- Columbia Stem Cell Initiative, Columbia University, 650 West 168th Street, NY, 10032, New York, USA
| | - James Warland
- Wellcome-MRC Cambridge Stem Cell Institute, Jeffrey Cheah Biomedical Centre, University of Cambridge, Puddicombe Way, Cambridge, UK
| | - Andrew Kent
- Willows Veterinary Centre and Referral Service; part of Linnaeus Veterinary Limited, Highlands Road, Shirley, Solihull, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Werner M, Unterer S. [Use of antimicrobials in acute canine diarrhea - overview of potential risks, indications and alternatives]. TIERAERZTLICHE PRAXIS AUSGABE KLEINTIERE HEIMTIERE 2021; 49:110-120. [PMID: 33902119 DOI: 10.1055/a-1395-2001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
In Germany, antibiotics are frequently used in dogs with gastrointestinal disorders such as acute diarrhea. In line with global efforts to limit antibiotic use, this literature review aims to provide a guideline for the rational and judicious use of antibiotics in acute canine diarrhea. Antibiotics can lead to gastrointestinal side effects and may exert a negative influence on the intestinal microbiota in addition to increasing the occurrence of resistant bacteria. There is also evidence that chronic immunological diseases may be triggered by the administration of antibiotics. Therefore, these should not be administered in uncomplicated acute diarrhea without signs of sepsis or systemic inflammatory reaction. In addition, enteropathogenic bacteria usually do not play a role in the etiology of acute diarrhea. For select clinical entities such as acute hemorrhagic diarrhea syndrome, antibiotic therapy should only be recommended in cases displaying signs of bacterial translocation with subsequent sepsis. In the case of parvovirosis, on the other hand, the administration of antibiotics is unavoidable due to the immunological incompetence of the dog caused by the accompanying severe neutropenia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melanie Werner
- Medizinische Kleintierklinik, Zentrum für Klinische Tiermedizin, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
| | - Stefan Unterer
- Medizinische Kleintierklinik, Zentrum für Klinische Tiermedizin, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Allerton F, Prior C, Bagcigil AF, Broens E, Callens B, Damborg P, Dewulf J, Filippitzi ME, Carmo LP, Gómez-Raja J, Harpaz E, Mateus A, Nolff M, Phythian CJ, Timofte D, Zendri F, Jessen LR. Overview and Evaluation of Existing Guidelines for Rational Antimicrobial Use in Small-Animal Veterinary Practice in Europe. Antibiotics (Basel) 2021; 10:antibiotics10040409. [PMID: 33918617 PMCID: PMC8069046 DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics10040409] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2021] [Revised: 04/05/2021] [Accepted: 04/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Antimicrobial stewardship guidelines (ASGs) represent an important tool to help veterinarians optimize their antimicrobial use with the objective of decreasing antimicrobial resistance. The aim of this study was to map and qualitatively assess the ASGs for antimicrobial use in cats and dogs in Europe. Country representatives of the European Network for Optimization of Veterinary Antimicrobial Treatment (ENOVAT) were asked to identify ASGs published in their countries. All collated ASGs updated since January 2010 containing recommendations on antimicrobial therapy for at least three conditions affecting different organ systems in cats and dogs underwent detailed review including AGREE II analysis. Out of forty countries investigated, fifteen ASGs from eleven countries met the inclusion criteria. Several critical principles of antimicrobial use were identified, providing a framework that should assist development of stewardship guidance. The AGREE II analysis highlighted several methodological limitations of the currently available ASGs. This study sheds light on the lack of national ASGs for dogs and cats in multiple European countries and should encourage national bodies to prioritize guideline development in small animals. A greater awareness of the need to use a structured approach to guideline development could improve the quality of ASGs in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fergus Allerton
- Willows Veterinary Centre and Referral Service, Highlands Road, Shirley, Solihull B90 4NH, UK
- Correspondence:
| | - Cameron Prior
- Veterinary Specialists Scotland, 1 Deer Park Road Livingston, Scotland EH54 8AG, UK;
| | - Arzu Funda Bagcigil
- Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, 34320 Avcılar, Istanbul, Turkey;
| | - Els Broens
- Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Biomolecular Health Sciences, Utrecht University, Yalelaan 1, 3584 CL Utrecht, The Netherlands;
| | - Bénédicte Callens
- Centre of Knowledge on Antimicrobial Use and Resistance, Galileelaan 5/02, 1210 Brussels, Belgium;
| | - Peter Damborg
- Department of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Stigbøjlen 4, 1870 Frederiksberg, Denmark;
| | - Jeroen Dewulf
- Veterinary Epidemiology Unit, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Salisburylaan 133, 9820 Merelbeke, Belgium;
| | | | - Luís Pedro Carmo
- Veterinary Public Health Institute, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, Schwarzenburgstrasse 161, 3097 Liebefeld, Bern, Switzerland;
| | | | - Erez Harpaz
- Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Institute for Production Animal Clinical Science, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Small Ruminant Research and Herd Health, Høyland, 4325 Sandnes, Norway; (E.H.); (C.J.P.)
| | - Ana Mateus
- Hawkshead Campus, Royal Veterinary College, University of London, Hawkshead Lane, Hatfield AL9 7TA, Hertfordshire, UK;
| | - Mirja Nolff
- Clinic for Small Animal Surgery Tierspital Zürich, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zürich, Winterthurerstrasse 260, 8057 Zürich, Switzerland;
| | - Clare J. Phythian
- Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Institute for Production Animal Clinical Science, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Small Ruminant Research and Herd Health, Høyland, 4325 Sandnes, Norway; (E.H.); (C.J.P.)
| | - Dorina Timofte
- Department of Veterinary Anatomy, Leahurst Campus, Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, Physiology and Pathology, University of Liverpool, Neston CH64 7TE, UK; (D.T.); (F.Z.)
| | - Flavia Zendri
- Department of Veterinary Anatomy, Leahurst Campus, Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, Physiology and Pathology, University of Liverpool, Neston CH64 7TE, UK; (D.T.); (F.Z.)
| | - Lisbeth Rem Jessen
- Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Dyrlægevej 16, 1870 Frederiksberg C, Denmark;
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Singleton DA, Rayner A, Brant B, Smyth S, Noble PJM, Radford AD, Pinchbeck GL. A randomised controlled trial to reduce highest priority critically important antimicrobial prescription in companion animals. Nat Commun 2021; 12:1593. [PMID: 33707426 PMCID: PMC7952375 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-21864-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2020] [Accepted: 02/12/2021] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Robust evidence supporting strategies for companion animal antimicrobial stewardship is limited, despite frequent prescription of highest priority critically important antimicrobials (HPCIA). Here we describe a randomised controlled trial where electronic prescription data were utilised (August 2018-January 2019) to identify above average HPCIA-prescribing practices (n = 60), which were randomly assigned into a control group (CG) and two intervention groups. In March 2019, the light intervention group (LIG) and heavy intervention group (HIG) were notified of their above average status, and were provided with educational material (LIG, HIG), in-depth benchmarking (HIG), and follow-up meetings (HIG). Following notification, follow-up monitoring lasted for eight months (April-November 2019; post-intervention period) for all intervention groups, though HIG practices were able to access further support (i.e., follow-up meetings) for the first six of these months if requested. Post-intervention, in the HIG a 23.5% and 39.0% reduction in canine (0.5% of total consultations, 95% confidence interval, 0.4-0.6, P = 0.04) and feline (4.4%, 3.4-5.3, P < 0.001) HPCIA-prescribing consultations was observed, compared to the CG (dogs: 0.6%, 0.5-0.8; cats: 7.4%, 6.0-8.7). The LIG was associated with a 16.7% reduction in feline HPCIA prescription (6.1% of total consultations, 5.3-7.0, P = 0.03). Therefore, in this trial we have demonstrated effective strategies for reducing veterinary HPCIA prescription.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David A Singleton
- Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Leahurst Campus, Chester High Road, Neston, UK.
| | | | - Bethaney Brant
- Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Leahurst Campus, Chester High Road, Neston, UK
| | - Steven Smyth
- Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Leahurst Campus, Chester High Road, Neston, UK
| | - Peter-John M Noble
- Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Leahurst Campus, Chester High Road, Neston, UK
| | - Alan D Radford
- Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Leahurst Campus, Chester High Road, Neston, UK
| | - Gina L Pinchbeck
- Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Leahurst Campus, Chester High Road, Neston, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Dazio V, Nigg A, Schmidt JS, Brilhante M, Mauri N, Kuster SP, Brawand SG, Schüpbach-Regula G, Willi B, Endimiani A, Perreten V, Schuller S. Acquisition and carriage of multidrug-resistant organisms in dogs and cats presented to small animal practices and clinics in Switzerland. J Vet Intern Med 2021; 35:970-979. [PMID: 33527554 PMCID: PMC7995377 DOI: 10.1111/jvim.16038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2020] [Revised: 12/28/2020] [Accepted: 01/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The emergence and spread of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO) present a threat to human and animal health. OBJECTIVES To assess acquisition, prevalence of and risk factors for MDRO carriage in dogs and cats presented to veterinary clinics or practices in Switzerland. ANIMALS Privately owned dogs (n = 183) and cats (n = 88) presented to 4 veterinary hospitals and 1 practice. METHODS Prospective, longitudinal, observational study. Oronasal and rectal swabs were collected at presentation and 69% of animals were sampled again at discharge. Methicillin-resistant (MR) staphylococci and macrococci, cephalosporinase-, and carbapenemase-producing (CP) Enterobacterales were isolated. Genetic relatedness of isolates was assessed by repetitive sequence-based polymerase chain reaction and multilocus sequence typing. Risk factors for MDRO acquisition and carriage were analyzed based on questionnaire-derived and hospitalization data. RESULTS Admission prevalence of MDRO carriage in pets was 15.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 11.4-20.4). The discharge prevalence and acquisition rates were 32.1% (95% CI, 25.5-39.3) and 28.3% (95% CI, 22-35.4), respectively. Predominant hospital-acquired isolates were extended spectrum β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli (ESBL-E coli; 17.3%) and β-lactamase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (13.7%). At 1 institution, a cluster of 24 highly genetically related CP (blaoxa181 and blaoxa48 ) was identified. Multivariate analysis identified hospitalization at clinic 1 (odds ratio [OR], 5.1; 95% CI, 1.6-16.8) and days of hospitalization (OR 3-5 days, 4.4; 95% CI, 1.8-10.9; OR > 5 days, 6.2; 95% CI, 1.3-28.8) as risk factors for MDRO acquisition in dogs. CONCLUSIONS Veterinary hospitals play an important role in the selection and transmission of MDRO among veterinary patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valentina Dazio
- Department of Clinical Veterinary Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Aurélien Nigg
- Institute of Veterinary Bacteriology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Janne S Schmidt
- Clinic for Small Animal Internal Medicine, University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Michael Brilhante
- Institute of Veterinary Bacteriology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.,Graduate School of Cellular and Biomedical Sciences, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Nico Mauri
- Tierklinik Aarau West AG, Oberentfelden, Switzerland
| | - Stephan P Kuster
- Better Together Healthcare Consulting, Steinackerstrasse 44, Wiesendangen, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Barbara Willi
- Clinic for Small Animal Internal Medicine, University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Andrea Endimiani
- Institute for Infectious Diseases, University of Bern, Faculty of Medicine, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Vincent Perreten
- Institute of Veterinary Bacteriology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Simone Schuller
- Department of Clinical Veterinary Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Lehner C, Hubbuch A, Schmitt K, Schuepbach-Regula G, Willi B, Mevissen M, Peter R, Muentener CR, Naegeli H, Schuller S. Effect of antimicrobial stewardship on antimicrobial prescriptions for selected diseases of dogs in Switzerland. J Vet Intern Med 2020; 34:2418-2431. [PMID: 33112451 PMCID: PMC7694852 DOI: 10.1111/jvim.15906] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2019] [Revised: 09/01/2020] [Accepted: 09/15/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) are important tools to foster prudent antimicrobial use. OBJECTIVE To evaluate antimicrobial prescriptions by Swiss veterinarians before and after introduction of the online ASP AntibioticScout.ch in December 2016. ANIMALS Dogs presented to 2 university hospitals and 14 private practices in 2016 or 2018 for acute diarrhea (AD; n = 779), urinary tract infection (UTI; n = 505), respiratory tract infection (RTI; n = 580), or wound infection (WI; n = 341). METHODS Retrospective study. Prescriptions of antimicrobials in 2016 and 2018 were compared and their appropriateness assessed by a justification score. RESULTS The proportion of dogs prescribed antimicrobials decreased significantly between 2016 and 2018 (74% vs 59%; P < .001). The proportion of prescriptions in complete agreement with guidelines increased significantly (48% vs 60%; P < .001) and those in complete disagreement significantly decreased (38% vs 24%; P < .001) during this time. Antimicrobial prescriptions for dogs with AD were significantly correlated with the presence of hemorrhagic diarrhea in both years, but a significantly lower proportion of dogs with hemorrhagic diarrhea were unnecessarily prescribed antimicrobials in 2018 (65% vs 36%; P < .001). In private practices, in 2018 a bacterial etiology of UTI was confirmed in 16% of dogs. Prescriptions for fluoroquinolones significantly decreased (29% vs 14%; P = .002). Prescriptions for antimicrobials decreased significantly in private practices for RTI (54% vs 31%; P < .001). CONCLUSION Antimicrobials were used more prudently for the examined indications in 2018 compared to 2016. The study highlights the continued need for ASPs in veterinary medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudia Lehner
- Division of Small Animal Internal Medicine, Department of Clinical Veterinary Science, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.,Institute of Veterinary Pharmacology and Toxicology, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Alina Hubbuch
- Institute of Veterinary Pharmacology and Toxicology, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.,Clinic for Small Animal Internal Medicine, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Kira Schmitt
- Clinic for Small Animal Internal Medicine, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.,Institute for Food Safety and Hygiene, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | - Barbara Willi
- Clinic for Small Animal Internal Medicine, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Meike Mevissen
- Division of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Ruth Peter
- Institute of Veterinary Pharmacology and Toxicology, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Cedric R Muentener
- Institute of Veterinary Pharmacology and Toxicology, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Hanspeter Naegeli
- Institute of Veterinary Pharmacology and Toxicology, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Simone Schuller
- Division of Small Animal Internal Medicine, Department of Clinical Veterinary Science, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Hardefeldt L, Hur B, Verspoor K, Baldwin T, Bailey KE, Scarborough R, Richards S, Billman-Jacobe H, Browning GF, Gilkerson J. Use of cefovecin in dogs and cats attending first-opinion veterinary practices in Australia. Vet Rec 2020; 187:e95. [PMID: 32826347 DOI: 10.1136/vr.105997] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2020] [Revised: 06/13/2020] [Accepted: 07/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cefovecin is a long-acting third-generation cephalosporin commonly used in veterinary medicine. Third-generation cephalosporins are critically important antimicrobials that should only be used after culture and susceptibility testing. The authors describe the common indications for cefovecin use in dogs and cats, and the frequency of culture and susceptibility testing. MATERIALS AND METHODS A cross-sectional study was performed using clinical records extracted from VetCompass Australia. A previously described method was used to identify records containing cefovecin. The reason for cefovecin use was annotated in situ in each consultation text. RESULTS Over a six-month period (February and September 2018), 5180 (0.4 per cent) consultations involved cefovecin administration, of which 151 were excluded. Cats were administered cefovecin more frequently than dogs (1.9 per cent of cat consultations and 0.1 per cent of dog consultations). The most common reasons for cefovecin administration to cats were cat fight injuries and abscesses (28 per cent) and dermatitis (13 per cent). For dogs, the most common reasons for cefovecin administration were surgical prophylaxis (24 per cent) and dermatitis (19 per cent). Culture and susceptibility testing were reported in 16 cases (0.3 per cent). CONCLUSION Cefovecin is used in many scenarios in dogs and cats where antimicrobials may be either not indicated or where an antimicrobial of lower importance to human health is recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Hardefeldt
- National Centre for Antimicrobial Stewardship, Carlton, Victoria, Australia .,Asia Pacific Centre for Animal Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Brian Hur
- National Centre for Antimicrobial Stewardship, Carlton, Victoria, Australia.,Asia Pacific Centre for Animal Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.,School of Computing and Information Systems, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Karin Verspoor
- School of Computing and Information Systems, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.,Health and Biomedical Informatics Centre, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Timothy Baldwin
- School of Computing and Information Systems, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Kirsten E Bailey
- National Centre for Antimicrobial Stewardship, Carlton, Victoria, Australia.,Asia Pacific Centre for Animal Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ri Scarborough
- National Centre for Antimicrobial Stewardship, Carlton, Victoria, Australia.,Asia Pacific Centre for Animal Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Suzanna Richards
- National Centre for Antimicrobial Stewardship, Carlton, Victoria, Australia.,Veterinary Biosciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Helen Billman-Jacobe
- National Centre for Antimicrobial Stewardship, Carlton, Victoria, Australia.,Asia Pacific Centre for Animal Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Glenn Francis Browning
- National Centre for Antimicrobial Stewardship, Carlton, Victoria, Australia.,Asia Pacific Centre for Animal Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - James Gilkerson
- Asia Pacific Centre for Animal Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Schmidt JS, Kuster SP, Nigg A, Dazio V, Brilhante M, Rohrbach H, Bernasconi OJ, Büdel T, Campos-Madueno EI, Gobeli Brawand S, Schuller S, Endimiani A, Perreten V, Willi B. Poor infection prevention and control standards are associated with environmental contamination with carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales and other multidrug-resistant bacteria in Swiss companion animal clinics. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 2020; 9:93. [PMID: 32576281 PMCID: PMC7310346 DOI: 10.1186/s13756-020-00742-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2020] [Accepted: 05/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Intensive medical care in companion animal clinics could pose a risk for the selection and dissemination of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs). Infection prevention and control (IPC) concepts are key measures to reduce the spread of MDROs, but data on IPC standards in companion animal clinics is sparse. The study assessed IPC standards in seven companion animal clinics and practices in Switzerland by structured IPC audits and combined results with environmental MDRO contamination and MDRO carriage of the personnel. Methods IPC audits were held between August 2018 and January 2019. The observations in 34 IPC areas were scored based on predefined criteria (not fulfilled/partially fulfilled/fulfilled = score 0/1/2). Environmental swabs and nasal and stool samples from veterinary personnel were tested for methicillin-resistant (MR) staphylococci and macrococci and for colistin-resistant, extended-spectrum β-lactamase- and carbapenemase-producing (CP) Enterobacterales (CPE). Species was identified by MALDI-TOF MS, antimicrobial resistance determined by microdilution and β-lactam resistance gene detection, and genetic relatedness assessed by REP−/ERIC-PCR and multilocus sequence typing. Results Of a maximum total IPC score of 68, the institutions reached a median (range) score of 33 (19–55). MDROs were detected in median (range) 8.2% (0–33.3%) of the sampling sites. Clinics with low IPC standards showed extensive environmental contamination, i.e. of intensive care units, consultation rooms and utensils. CPE were detected in two clinics; one of them showed extensive contamination with CP Klebsiella pneumoniae (ST11, blaOXA-48) and MR Staphylococcus pseudintermedius (ST551, mecA). Despite low IPC scores, environmental contamination with MDROs was low in primary opinion practices. Three employees were colonized with Escherichia coli ST131 (blaCTX-M-15, blaCTX-M-27, blaCTX-M-14). Two employees carried CP E. coli closely related to environmental (ST410, blaOXA-181) and patient-derived isolates (ST167, blaNDM-5). MR Staphylococcus aureus (ST225, mecA) and MR S. pseudintermedius (ST551, mecA) of the same sequence types and with similar resistance profiles were found in employees and the environment in two clinics. Conclusions The study indicates that IPC standards in companion animal clinics are variable and that insufficient IPC standards could contribute to the evolution of MDROs which can be transferred between the environment and working personnel. The implementation of IPC concepts in companion animal clinics should urgently be promoted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janne S Schmidt
- Clinic for Small Animal Internal Medicine, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Stefan P Kuster
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, University and University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Aurélien Nigg
- Institute of Veterinary Bacteriology, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Valentina Dazio
- Division of Small Animal Internal Medicine, Department of Clinical Veterinary Medicine, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Michael Brilhante
- Institute of Veterinary Bacteriology, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.,Graduate School of Cellular and Biomedical Sciences, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Helene Rohrbach
- Small Animal Clinic, Department of Clinical Veterinary Medicine, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Odette J Bernasconi
- Institute for Infectious Diseases, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Thomas Büdel
- Institute for Infectious Diseases, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Edgar I Campos-Madueno
- Institute for Infectious Diseases, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Stefanie Gobeli Brawand
- Institute of Veterinary Bacteriology, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Simone Schuller
- Division of Small Animal Internal Medicine, Department of Clinical Veterinary Medicine, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Andrea Endimiani
- Institute for Infectious Diseases, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Vincent Perreten
- Institute of Veterinary Bacteriology, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Barbara Willi
- Clinic for Small Animal Internal Medicine, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|