Radiation Doses in Consecutive CT Examinations from Five University of California Medical Centers

Radiation exposure during sacral neuromodulation lead placement: Multi-institutional descriptive study

OBJECTIVES

Fluoroscopy has significantly improved lead placement and decreased surgical time for implantable sacral neuromodulation (SNM). There is a paucity of data regarding radiation and safety of fluoroscopy during SNM procedures. Our study aims to characterize fluoroscopy time and dose used during SNM surgery across multiple institutions and assess for predictors of increased fluoroscopy time and radiation dose.

METHODS

Electronic medical records were queried for SNM procedures (Stage 1 and full implant) from 2016 to 2021 at four academic institutions. Demographic, clinical, and intraoperative data were collected, including fluoroscopy time and radiation dose in milligray (mGy). The data were entered into a centralized REDCap database. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed to assess for predictive factors using STATA/BE 17.0.

RESULTS

A total of 664 procedures were performed across four institutions. Of these, 363 (54.6%) procedures had complete fluoroscopy details recorded. Mean surgical time was 58.8 min. Of all procedures, 79.6% were performed by Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery specialists. There was significant variability in fluoroscopy time and dose based on surgical specialty and institution. Most surgeons (76.4%) were considered "low volume" implanters. In a multivariate analysis, bilateral finder needle testing, surgical indication, surgeon volume, and institution significantly predicted increased fluoroscopy time and radiation dose (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

There is significant variability in fluoroscopy time and radiation dose utilized during SNM procedures, with differences across institutions, surgeons, and subspecialties. Increased radiation exposure can have harmful impacts on the surgical team and patient. These findings demonstrate the need for standardized fluoroscopy use during SNM procedures.

A numerical study on the siphonic effect of enhanced external counterpulsation at lower extremities with a coupled 0D-1D closed-loop personalized hemodynamics model

Enhanced external counterpulsation (EECP) is a treatment and rehabilitation approach for ischemic diseases, including coronary artery disease. Its therapeutic benefits are primarily attributed to the improved blood circulation achieved through sequential mechanical compression of the lower extremities. However, despite the crucial role that hemodynamic effects in the lower extremity arteries play in determining the effectiveness of EECP treatment, most studies have focused on the diastole phase and ignored the systolic phase. In the present study, a novel siphon model (SM) was developed to investigate the interdependence of several hemodynamic parameters, including pulse wave velocity, femoral flow rate, the operation pressure of cuffs, and the mean blood flow changes in the femoral artery throughout EECP therapy. To verify the accuracy of the SM, we coupled the predicted afterload in the lower extremity arteries during deflation using SM with the 0D-1D patient-specific model. Finally, the simulation results were compared with clinical measurements obtained during EECP therapy to verify the applicability and accuracy of the SM, as well as the coupling method. The precision and reliability of the previously developed personalized approach were further affirmed in this study. The average waveform similarity coefficient between the simulation results and the clinical measurements during the rest state exceeded 90%. This work has the potential to enhance our understanding of the hemodynamic mechanisms involved in EECP treatment and provide valuable insights for clinical decision-making.

Maternal and Fetal Radiation-Induced Cancer Risk From Computed Tomography Pulmonary Angiography During Pregnancy: A Retrospective Cohort Study Across a Multihospital Integrated Health Care Network

OBJECTIVE

Computed tomography pulmonary angiogram (CTPA) is important to evaluate suspected pulmonary embolism in pregnancy but has maternal/fetal radiation risks. The objective of this study was to estimate maternal and fetal radiation-induced cancer risk from CTPA during pregnancy.

METHODS

Simulation modeling via the National Cancer Institute's Radiation Risk Assessment Tool was used to estimate excess cancer risks from 17 organ doses from CTPA during pregnancy, with doses determined by a radiation dose indexing monitoring system. Organ doses were obtained from a radiation dose indexing monitoring system. Maternal and fetal cancer risks per 100,000 were calculated for male and female fetuses and several maternal ages.

RESULTS

The 534 CTPA examinations had top 3 maternal organ doses to the breast, lung, and stomach of 17.34, 15.53, and 9.43 mSv, respectively, with a mean uterine dose of 0.21 mSv. The total maternal excess risks of developing cancer per 100,000 were 181, 151, 121, 107, 94.5, 84, and 74.4, respectively, for a 20-, 25-, 30-, 35-, 40-, 45-, and 50-year-old woman undergoing CTPA, compared with baseline cancer risks of 41,408 for 20-year-old patients. The total fetal excess risks of developing cancer per 100,000 were 12.3 and 7.3 for female and male fetuses, respectively, when compared with baseline cancer risks of 41,227 and 48,291.

DISCUSSION

Excess risk of developing cancer from CTPA was small relative to baseline cancer risk for pregnant patients and fetuses, decreased for pregnant patients with increasing maternal age, and was greater for female fetuses than male fetuses.

Establishment of a local diagnostic reference level for computed tomography chest and abdomen in two different cities in Saudi Arabia

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Spiral computed tomography (CT) scans, which are considered a high-contrast resolution, quick and cross-sectional imaging technique, have grown in popularity as a result of technological advancements. However, these advancements have brought with them the potential for significantly increased radiation doses to the patient. Consequently, many organizations recommended optimization and establishing diagnostic reference levels. The aim of the current study was to assess CT radiation dose and propose a local diagnostic reference level (LDRL) for the adult trunk [chest and abdomen] using CT dose parameters such as CT dose index volume (CTDIvol) and dose length product (DLP) as well as to compare the practices for aforementioned examinations between two hospitals in Taif and Abha cities in Saudi Arabia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data from 428 patients (216 for abdomen and 212 for chest) who were examined in two hospitals in Taif and Abha City in Saudi Arabia from December 2022 to March 2023, are used in this study. The data for hospitals in Taif and Abha are presented as 'T' and 'A' throughout this manuscript. The parameters of exposure and slice thickness were recorded in a specially designed data sheet together with the gender, age and patients morphometric. Microsoft Excel version 2010 was used to analyze results and plot the figures. The LDRL was achieved from the third quartile of CTDIvol and DLP for each hospital and examination.

RESULTS

The average DLP (mGy-cm) and CTDIvol (mGy) for the chest and abdomen were 243 mGy cm, 5.8 mGy and 549 mGy cm, 8.6 mGy respectively. The average effective dose (ED) for chest and abdomen were 5.10 and 21.10 mSv, respectively. The proposed LDRL for the chest and abdomen were 6.9 mGy (CTDIvol), 375 mGy-cm (DLP), 7.8 mGy (CTDIvol), and 747 (DLP) mGy-cm, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Hospital 'A' irradiated patients with a higher dose for the abdomen exam than Hospital 'T', but both hospitals agreed on the amount of radiation dose received by patients for chest imaging. The proposed LDRL for two examinations was less than the DRL obtained from the literature.

Premature atherosclerosis: An analysis over 39 years in the Netherlands. Implications for young individuals in high-risk families

Cardiovascular disease (CVD), especially atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), is one of the most important disease problems in the world accounting for an estimated 18.6 million deaths globally. Although older individuals are more often affected, ASCVD event at a young age is of particular importance because of more healthy years lost. Therefore, it is important to identify young individuals correctly at risk of ASCVD events in an early stage. Unfortunately, current risk score algorithms underestimate ASCVD event risk at a younger age. Both coronary artery calcium scoring (CACs) and family history of premature ASCVD (FH-PASCVD) have emerged as reliable screening tools to be able to identify individuals at risk for ASCVD events. Positive FH-PASCVD is associated with higher absolute CAC scores in first-degree 'healthy' family members and the proportion of individuals above the CACs percentile threshold to warrant treatment is also higher as compared to the general population. Therefore, a positive FH-PASCVD identifies so-called high-risk families and adding CAC scoring within these families identifies individuals at increased risk for ASCVD events. In individuals from high-risk families with an elevated CAC score, ASCVD events can be prevented when treated with statins and aspirin. Therefore, we suggest assessing FH-PASCVD in young 'healthy' individuals as a first screening step and subsequently performing CAC scoring to be able to start treatment at an early stage, since not only the lower is better, but also the earlier is better.

Non-Contrast-Enhanced MR Arteriography of Potential Living-Related Liver Donor: Using Contrast Enhanced CT Arteriography as Standard Reference

BACKGROUND

Contrast-enhanced computed tomography angiography (CTA) and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) are the primary modalities to assess donors' vessels before transplant surgery. Radiation and contrast medium are potentially harmful to donors.

PURPOSE

To compare the image quality and visualization scores of hepatic arteries on CTA and balanced steady-state free-precession (bSSFP) non-contrast-enhanced MRA (NC-MRA), and to evaluate if bSSFP NC-MRA can potentially be a substitute for CTA.

STUDY TYPE

Prospective.

POPULATION

Fifty-six consecutive potential living-related liver donors (30.9 ± 8.4 years; 31 men).

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE

1.5T; four bSSFP NC-MRA sequences: respiratory-triggered (Inhance inflow inversion recovery [IFIR]) and three breath-hold (BH); and CTA.

ASSESSMENT

The artery-to-liver contrast (Ca-l) was quantified. Three radiologists independently assigned visualization scores using a four-point scale to potential origins, segments, and branches of the hepatic arteries, determined the anatomical variants based on Hiatt's classification, and assessed the image quality of NC-MRA sequences.

STATISTICAL TESTS

Fleiss' kappa to evaluate the readers' agreement. Repeat measured ANOVA or Friedman test to compare Ca-l of each NC-MRA. Friedman test to compare overall image quality and visualization scores; post hoc analysis using Wilcoxon signed-rank test. P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Inhance IFIR Ca-l was significantly higher than all BH bSSFP Ca-l (0.56 [0.45-0.64] vs. 0.37 [0.29-0.47] to 0.41 [0.23-0.51]). Overall image quality score of BH bSSFP TI1200 was significantly higher than other NC-MRA (4 [4-4] vs. 4 [3 to 4-4]). The median visualization scores of almost all arteries on CTA were significantly higher than on NC-MRA (4 [3 to 4-4] vs. 1 [1-2] to 4 [4-4]). The median visualization scores were all 4 [4-4 ] on Inhance IFIR with >92.3% observed scores ≥3, except the segment 4 branch (3 [1-4], 53.6%). The identification rates of arterial variants were 92.9%-97% on Inhance IFIR.

DATA CONCLUSIONS

Although CTA is superior to the NC-MRA, all NC-MRA depict the donor arterial anatomy well. Inhance IFIR can potentially be an alternative image modality for CTA to evaluate the arterial variants of living donors.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.

Computed Tomography of the Head : A Systematic Review on Acquisition and Reconstruction Techniques to Reduce Radiation Dose

In 1971, the first computed tomography (CT) scan was performed on a patient's brain. Clinical CT systems were introduced in 1974 and dedicated to head imaging only. New technological developments, broader availability, and the clinical success of CT led to a steady growth in examination numbers. Most frequent indications for non-contrast CT (NCCT) of the head include the assessment of ischemia and stroke, intracranial hemorrhage and trauma, while CT angiography (CTA) has become the standard for first-line cerebrovascular evaluation; however, resulting improvements in patient management and clinical outcomes come at the cost of radiation exposure, increasing the risk for secondary morbidity. Therefore, radiation dose optimization should always be part of technical advancements in CT imaging but how can the dose be optimized? What dose reduction can be achieved without compromising diagnostic value, and what is the potential of the upcoming technologies artificial intelligence and photon counting CT? In this article, we look for answers to these questions by reviewing dose reduction techniques with respect to the major clinical indications of NCCT and CTA of the head, including a brief perspective on what to expect from current and future developments in CT technology with respect to radiation dose optimization.

Design and Validation of a Deep Learning Model for Renal Stone Detection and Segmentation on Kidney-Ureter-Bladder Images

Kidney-ureter-bladder (KUB) imaging is used as a frontline investigation for patients with suspected renal stones. In this study, we designed a computer-aided diagnostic system for KUB imaging to assist clinicians in accurately diagnosing urinary tract stones. The image dataset used for training and testing the model comprised 485 images provided by Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. The proposed system was divided into two subsystems, 1 and 2. Subsystem 1 used Inception-ResNetV2 to train a deep learning model on preprocessed KUB images to verify the improvement in diagnostic accuracy with image preprocessing. Subsystem 2 trained an image segmentation model using the ResNet hybrid, U-net, to accurately identify the contours of renal stones. The performance was evaluated using a confusion matrix for the classification model. We conclude that the model can assist clinicians in accurately diagnosing renal stones via KUB imaging. Therefore, the proposed system can assist doctors in diagnosis, reduce patients' waiting time for CT scans, and minimize the radiation dose absorbed by the body.

Evaluation of radiation dose in multi-slice computed tomography protocols of head and neck regions

In head and neck computed tomography (CT) imaging, the optimisation of radiation dose is crucial due to the presence of radio-sensitive organs. This study aimed to evaluate the radiation dose in multi-slice CT for head and neck examinations. Volume CT dose index, dose length product and effective dose (E) were assessed for 10 head and neck CT scans performed on 292 adult patients (mean age 49.2 ± 15.9 y). The study resulted in median E values of 0.82, 1.62, 2.43, 0.93, 1.70, 0.83, 3.55, 6.25, 2.19 and 5.26 mSv, respectively, for sinuses (non-contrast (NC)), sinuses (NC) and contrast-enhanced (CE), petrous bone (PTB)/internal auditory meatus (IAM) (NC + CE), PTB/IAM (NC), orbit (NC + CE), orbit (NC), brain with the orbit (NC), brain CT angiography (CTA) subtraction, neck (NC) and brain/neck (NC). Furthermore, the overall radiation doses of this institution were found to be below the values suggested by similar studies. However, optimisation of the dose is required for brain CTA.

Establishment of national diagnostic dose reference levels (DRLs) for routine computed tomography examinations in Jordan

Background: Dose reference levels (DRLs) are used as indicators as well as guidance for dose optimization and to ensure justification of appropriate dose for a given clinical indication. The main aims of this study were to establish local DRLs for each CT imaging protocol as a reference point to evaluate the radiation dose indices and to compare our DRLs with those established in other countries and against the internationally reported guidelines.

Materials and methods: 2000 CT dose reports of different adult imaging protocols from January 2021 until April 2022 were collected retrospectively at different hospitals in Jordan. Data were collected from CT scans that were performed using different types and models of CT scanners and included four adult non-enhanced, helical CT imaging protocols; Head, Chest, Abdomen-Pelvis, and Chest-Abdomen-Pelvis.

Results: The average doses of CTDIvol, DLP, and effective dose were (65.11 mGy, 1232.71 mGy·cm, 2.83 mSv) for the head scan, (16.6 mGy, 586.6 mGy·cm, 8.21 mSv) for the chest scan, (17.91 mGy, 929.9 mGy·cm, 13.9 mSv) for the abdomen-pelvis scan, and (19.3 mGy, 1152 mGy·cm, 17.25 mSv) for the chest-abdomen-pelvis scan. In comparison with results from different international studies, DLP values measured in the present study were lower for the chest-abdomen-pelvis and abdomen-pelvis CT scans, and higher for the head CT and chest CT scans.

Conclusions: It is very important that each country establishes its own DRLs and compares them with those reported by other countries, especially the developed ones. It is also important that these levels are regularly updated.

Effectiveness of body size stratification for patient exposure optimization in Computed Tomography

PURPOSE

To establish size-dependent DRL and to estimate the effectiveness of the size-dependent DRLs over size-independent DRLs for a CT exposure optimization process.

METHODS

The study included 16,933 adult CT body examinations of the most common CT protocols. Acquisitions were included following an image quality assessment. Patients were grouped into five different classes by means of the water equivalent diameter (D_w): 21 ≤ D_w < 25, 25 ≤ D_w < 29, 29 ≤ D_w < 33,33 ≤ D_w < 37 (in cm). CTDI_vol, DLP, DLP_tot. and SSDE median values were provided both for the sample as a whole (size-independent approach) and for each D_w class (size-dependent approach). The performance of the two approaches in classifying sub-optimal examinations was evaluated through the confusion matrix and Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC) metric. The 75th percentile of the CTDI_vol distribution was arbitrarily chosen as a threshold level above which the acquisitions are considered sub-optimal.

RESULTS

CTDI_vol, DLP, DLP_tot and SSDE typical values (median values) are statistically different across D_w groups. The confusion matrix analysis suggests that size-independent DRL could not mark potential suboptimal protocols for small and large patients. The agreement between the size-dependent and size-independent methods is strong only for the most populous classes (MCC > 0.7). For small and large patients size-independent approach fails to identify as sub-optimal around 20 % of the acquisition (MCC≪0.2).

CONCLUSIONS

It was proven by means of the confusion matrix and MCC metric that stratifying DRLs by patient size, size-dependent DRL can be a powerful strategy in order to improve the dose optimization process shown that a size-independent DRL fails to identify sub-optimal examinations for small and large patients.

Optimized Camera-Based Patient Positioning in CT: Impact on Radiation Exposure

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether a 3-dimensional (3D) camera can outperform highly trained technicians in precision of patient positioning and whether this transforms into a reduction in patient exposure.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In a single-center study, 3118 patients underwent computer tomography (CT) scans of the chest and/or abdomen on a latest generation single-source CT scanner supported with an automated patient positioning system by 3D camera. One thousand five hundred fifty-seven patients were positioned laser-guided by a highly trained radiographer (camera off) and 1561 patients with 3D camera (camera on) guidance. Radiation parameters such as effective dose, organ doses, CT dose index, and dose length product were analyzed and compared. Isocenter accuracy and table height were evaluated between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

Isocenter positioning was significantly improved with the 3D camera ( P < 0.001) as compared with visual laser-guided positioning. Absolute table height differed significantly ( P < 0.001), being higher with camera positioning (165.6 ± 16.2 mm) as compared with laser-guided positioning (170.0 ± 20.4 mm). Radiation exposure decreased using the 3D camera as indicated by dose length product (321.1 ± 266.6 mGy·cm; camera off: 342.0 ± 280.7 mGy·cm; P = 0.033), effective dose (3.3 ± 2.7 mSv; camera off: 3.5 ± 2.9; P = 0.053), and CT dose index (6.4 ± 4.3 mGy; camera off: 6.8 ± 4.6 mGy; P = 0.011). Exposure of radiation-sensitive organs such as colon ( P = 0.015) and red bone marrow ( P = 0.049) were also lower using the camera.

CONCLUSIONS

The introduction of a 3D camera improves patient positioning in the isocenter of the scanner, which results in a lower and also better balanced dose reduction for the patients.

Deep Learning Model for Computer-Aided Diagnosis of Urolithiasis Detection from Kidney-Ureter-Bladder Images

Kidney-ureter-bladder (KUB) imaging is a radiological examination with a low cost, low radiation, and convenience. Although emergency room clinicians can arrange KUB images easily as a first-line examination for patients with suspicious urolithiasis, interpreting the KUB images correctly is difficult for inexperienced clinicians. Obtaining a formal radiology report immediately after a KUB imaging examination can also be challenging. Recently, artificial-intelligence-based computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) systems have been developed to help clinicians who are not experts make correct diagnoses for further treatment more effectively. Therefore, in this study, we proposed a CAD system for KUB imaging based on a deep learning model designed to help first-line emergency room clinicians diagnose urolithiasis accurately. A total of 355 KUB images were retrospectively collected from 104 patients who were diagnosed with urolithiasis at Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. Then, we trained a deep learning model with a ResNet architecture to classify KUB images in terms of the presence or absence of kidney stones with this dataset of pre-processed images. Finally, we tuned the parameters and tested the model experimentally. The results show that the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and F1-measure of the model were 0.977, 0.953, 1, and 0.976 on the validation set and 0.982, 0.964, 1, and 0.982 on the testing set, respectively. Moreover, the results demonstrate that the proposed model performed well compared to the existing CNN-based methods and was able to detect urolithiasis in KUB images successfully. We expect the proposed approach to help emergency room clinicians make accurate diagnoses and reduce unnecessary radiation exposure from computed tomography (CT) scans, along with the associated medical costs.

Computed Tomography of the Spine

The introduction of the first whole-body CT scanner in 1974 marked the beginning of cross-sectional spine imaging. In the last decades, the technological advancement, increasing availability and clinical success of CT led to a rapidly growing number of CT examinations, also of the spine. After initially being primarily used for trauma evaluation, new indications continued to emerge, such as assessment of vertebral fractures or degenerative spine disease, preoperative and postoperative evaluation, or CT-guided interventions at the spine; however, improvements in patient management and clinical outcomes come along with higher radiation exposure, which increases the risk for secondary malignancies. Therefore, technical developments in CT acquisition and reconstruction must always include efforts to reduce the radiation dose. But how exactly can the dose be reduced? What amount of dose reduction can be achieved without compromising the clinical value of spinal CT examinations and what can be expected from the rising stars in CT technology: artificial intelligence and photon counting CT? In this article, we try to answer these questions by systematically reviewing dose reduction techniques with respect to the major clinical indications of spinal CT. Furthermore, we take a concise look on the dose reduction potential of future developments in CT hardware and software.

The positive prediction of single photon emission computed tomography/ computed tomography (SPECT/CT) in the outcome of intervention for cervical facet pain

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Previous studies have reported that magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) do not predict response to facet blocks. However, single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) uptake within facet joints has been shown to correlate with pain relief after intervention in the lumbar spine. There is minimal data regarding the predictive value of single photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) for neck pain.

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the utility of SPECT/CT in patients with axial neck pain for the identification of specific facet joints that would benefit from diagnostic and therapeutic facet joint steroid injections and/or medial branch block/RFA treatments.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

One hundred seventy-nine patients at a single institution pain center with neck pain and a SPECT/CT scan between 2009 and 2015. One hundred twelve patients had no prior intervention at the level of interest and met inclusion criteria.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Pain reduction at 50% and 80% thresholds within 24 hours of facet intervention. Concordance of facet intervention with the focus of maximal uptake on SPECT/CT scan.

METHODS

All patients were referred to our institution's Center for Pain Medicine and were treated with facet interventions. The site of facet intervention was determined by pain center providers based on their clinical examination and interpretation of images. Groups were formed based on whether the facet intervention included the level of maximal uptake on SPECT/CT scan. A positive response to intervention was defined at both 50% and 80% thresholds for reduction in pain within 24 hours of facet injection with steroid and local anesthetic or medial branch block with local anesthetic only. These were the facet interventions used for our data collection. A Chi-square statistic was used to analyze categorical data and a Student's t-test was used to analyze non-categorical data. SPSS (IBM Corp. IBM SPSS Version 24.0) was used for all analyses.

RESULTS

Of our 112 patients, Group 1 consisted of 89 with an intervention occurring at the level with increased uptake on SPECT/CT. Group 2 consisted of 23 patients with an intervention at a level without uptake on SPECT/CT. Demographic data did not significantly differ between cohorts. A Chi-square test of independence demonstrated that intervention at a level concordant with SPECT/CT was significantly correlated with self-reported pain relief thresholds of both 50% and 80% (p=.0002).

CONCLUSIONS

Facet interventions based on SPECT/CT scan uptake were more successful in pain reduction than those which were not. This suggests a role for SPECT/CT in diagnosing therapeutic targets for neck pain.

Development of acceptable quality radiation dose levels for common computed tomography examinations: A focused multicenter study in United Arab Emirates

Purpose

Diagnostic Reference Level (DRL) is a practical tool for radiation dose optimization, yet it does not indicate the patient size or image quality. The Acceptable Quality Dose (AQD) introduced to address the limitations of the DRLs and it is based on image quality, radiation dose, and patient weight. The aim of this study is to establish the AQD for adult patients' undergoing Computed Tomography (CT) examinations (Head, chest, abdomen).

Methods

This study is conducted in the four main hospitals at the Ministry of Health and Prevention. Patient information and exposure parameters were extracted. All the acceptable images are scored for their quality assessments. Data is classified as seven weight groups, <50, 50-59, 60-69, 70-79, 80-89, 90-99, and ≥100 kg. The mean ± SD, median, and 75th are calculated for the CTDIvol and DLP for each weight group per examination.

Results

Out of 392, 358 CT examinations are scored with acceptable quality. The median CTDIvol values for the weight groups are obtained as 24.6, 25.4, 25.4, 25.0, 26.0, 27.0, and 29.0 mGy. Moreover, median DLP values are obtained as 576.7, 601.0, 616.5, 636.1, 654.0, 650.0, 780.0, and 622.5 mGy.cm, respectively, for head CT without Contrast Media (CM). Similar calculation for head CT with (CM), chest without CM, abdomen without CM, and chest and abdomen (with and without CM) CTs are presented.

Conclusion

Images with bad, unacceptable and higher than necessary qualities contribute to increasing patient dose and increasing the DRLs. The AQD for the selected examinations were lower than the proposed DRLs in the United Arab Emirates. The integration of image quality and patients size in the assessment of the AQD values provide effective model to compare radiation dose indices within facility and compare with others. The obtained results may be useful in terms of improving dose and the diagnostic quality in the national and international levels.

Comparative Assessment of Noise Properties for Two Deep Learning CT Image Reconstruction Techniques and Filtered Back Projection

BACKGROUND

Two deep-learning image reconstruction (DLIR) techniques from two different CT vendors have recently been introduced into clinical practice.

PURPOSE

To characterize the noise properties of two DLIR techniques with different training methods, using a phantom containing a simple uniform and a complex non-uniform region.

METHODS

A water-bath phantom with a diameter of 300 mm was used as a base phantom. A textured phantom with a diameter of 128 mm, which was made of two materials, one equivalent to water and the other being 12 mg/mL diluted iodine, irregularly mixed to create a complex texture (non-uniform region), was placed in the base phantom. Thirty repeated phantom scans were performed using two CT scanners (GE, Revolution CT with Apex Edition; Canon, Aquilion One PRISM Edition) at two dose levels (CTDI: 5 and 15 mGy). Images were reconstructed with each CT system's filtered back projection (FBP) and DLIR [GE, TrueFidelity (TF); Canon, Advanced intelligent Clear-IQ Engine Body Sharp (AC)] for three process strengths. For basic characteristics of noise, the standard deviation (SD) and noise power spectrum (NPS) were measured for the uniform (water) region. A noise magnitude map was generated by calculating the inter-image SD at each pixel position across the 30 images. Then, a noise reduction map (NRM), which visualizes the relative differences in noise magnitude between FBP and DLIR, was calculated. The NRM values ranged from 0.0 to 1.0. A low NRM value represents a less aggressive noise reduction. The histograms of the NRM value were analyzed for the uniform and non-uniform regions.

RESULTS

The reduction in noise magnitude compared with FBP tended to be greater with AC (45%-85%) than with TF (32%-65%). The average NPS frequencies of TF and AC were almost comparable to those of FBP, except for the low-dose condition and the high noise reduction strength for AC. The NRM values of TF and AC were higher in the uniform region than in the non-uniform region. In the non-uniform region, TF's average NRM values (0.21-0.48) tended to be lower than AC's (0.39-0.78). The histograms for TF showed a small overlap between the uniform and the non-uniform regions; in contrast, those for AC showed a greater overlap. This difference seems to indicate that TF processes the uniform and non-uniform regions more differently than AC does.

CONCLUSION

This study has revealed a distinct difference in characteristics between the two DLIR techniques: TF tends to offer less aggressive noise reduction in non-uniform regions and preserve the original signals, whereas AC tends to prioritize noise filtering over edge-preservation, especially at the low-dose condition and with the high noise reduction strength. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Dose-Tracking Software: A Retrospective Analysis of Dosimetric Data in CT Procedures

ABSTRACT

The increasing use of ionizing radiation in healthcare is causing growing alarm about radiation protection of patients and the doses they receive during procedures. Radiation dose assessment for patients in radiodiagnostic procedures is the subject of interest in view of the recent Italian D.Lgs 31 July 2020, n. 101 (Decreto Legislativo 31 luglio 2020, n. 101) and one of its most important focuses is the prescription to provide patient exposure information as an integral part of the examination report. Dose monitoring systems are therefore essential for the collection of the dosimetric data. In order to analyse potential and critical issues of these software, different systems, adopted at the Antonio Cardarelli Hospital in Naples, were employed. Data extracted from the DoseWatch software (GE Healthcare) and Gray Detector (EL.CO. S.r.l. Healthcare Solutions, Italy) and relating to several protocols adopted for computed tomography (CT), were retrospectively analysed for the purpose of identifying critical issues in the data acquisition and recording phase, comparing with Italian nationwide diagnostic reference levels (DRLs), as provided for in regulatory provisions for radiation safety. Multiphase examinations were also included in this study. Once the distributions of volumetric CT Dose Index (CTDIvol) and dose-length product (DLP) were determined for each acquisition phase and total DLP (DLPtot) for each examination, the 25th, 50th and 75th percentiles were calculated for each distribution and then compared with the relevant Italian nationwide DRLs. In addition, to improve protocol optimization and dose reduction the magnitude of the CT acquisition settings chosen in each procedure was evaluated. In conclusion, these systems allow accurate analysis of radiation dose according to equipment and protocol over time. For the application of optimization measures, a constant use of the dose tracking software is required, which can be translated into actions on scan parameters and prospective data analysis.

How much should we be concerned about cumulative effective doses in medical imaging?

The International Atomic Energy Agency issued a statement calling for action to strengthen the radiation protection of patients undergoing recurrent imaging. This followed reports of patients receiving cumulative effective doses over 100 mSv from multiple computed tomography examinations. In order to evaluate excess risks of cancer incidence among UK patients, data from an exposure management system covering three hospitals within one trust have been studied over 5½ years. Cumulative effective doses for 105 757 patients, from whom 719 (0.68%) received effective dose over 100 mSv, have been analysed using age and sex specific risk factors for stochastic effects. Two cancers might be expected to be initiated in the patients receiving over 100 mSv, while five might be expected to develop cancer among patients receiving 50-100 mSv. However, the calculations ignore health conditions for which the patients are being treated that may shorten their lives, and rely on the linear-no-threshold dose-effect model which is a subject of debate, so they are likely to overestimate cancer incidence. If health of the patients receiving >100 mSv is taken into account, the risk of mortality from cancer initiated by medical exposure might be the order of 1 in 2000. Recommendations on further strengthening of optimisation should be applied to imaging procedures for all patients with special focus on those performed on children and adolescents.

Marginal indirect standardization using latent clustering on multiple hospitals

A method was introduced in 2018 of performing indirect standardization for hospital profiling when only the marginal distributions of confounding variables are observed for the index hospital but the full joint covariate distribution is available for the reference hospitals (Wang et al, J Am Stat Assoc 2018; 114:662-630). The method constructs a synthetic comparison hospital using a weighted combination of reference hospitals, with weights assumed to follow a Dirichlet distribution with equal concentration parameters. In this article, we propose a novel method that improves upon the approach in a previous study (Wang et al, J Am Stat Assoc 2018; 114:662-630), by assuming the existence of latent classes among reference hospitals to allow for unequal Dirichlet concentration parameters. The latent class memberships, and thus the hospital weights, are informed by hospital-level characteristics. Our new method results in less biased point estimates and narrower uncertainty intervals for the standardized incidence ratio compared with the existing approach. We show the superiority of our novel methods in an application to a study on prevalence of high-radiation computed tomography exams, as well as in a simulation of the same medical context.

NATIONAL DIAGNOSTIC REFERENCE LEVELS AND ACHIEVABLE DOSES FOR STANDARD CT EXAMINATIONS IN SUDAN

Radiation doses were determined to propose national diagnostic reference levels (NDRLs) and achievable doses (ADs) for computed tomography (CT) examinations in Sudan. Doses were estimated from retrospectively collected scan parameters for 1336 CT examinations of adult patients from 14 Sudanese hospitals using CT Expo 2.5 software. ADs and NDRLs were set at the 50th and 75th percentile of the hospital median dose distribution, respectively. The proposed CTDIvol (mGy) ADs ranged from: 10 (chest) to 64 (head), and that of the dose-length product (DLP; mGy.cm) ranged from 366 (chest) to 1225 (head). The proposed CTDIvol (mGy) NDRLs ranged from 15 kidney-ureter-bladder (KUB) to 79 (head), whereas that of the DLP (mGy.cm) ranged from 690 (chest) to 1490 (head). Current doses fell within the upper range of the doses presented in the literature emphasizing the need for implementation of the current ADs and NDRLs for CT to enhance patient protection and dose optimization in Sudan.

CT pulmonary angiography in pregnancy: Specific conversion factors to estimate effective radiation dose from dose length product: A retrospective cross-sectional study across a multi-hospital integrated healthcare network

PURPOSE

Effective dose describes radiation-related cancer risk from CT scans and is estimated using a readily available conversion factor (k-factor), which varies by body part and study type. To purpose of this study is to determine the specific k-factor for CTPA in pregnant patients and its predictive factors.

METHODS

This retrospective cross-sectional study evaluates CTPA in pregnancy across a multihospital integrated healthcare network from January 2012 to April 2017. Patient and CTPA-related data were obtained from the electronic health record and a radiation dose index monitoring system. Each patient's effective dose was determined by patient-specific Monte-Carlo simulation with Cristy phantoms and divided by patient dose-length-product to determine the k-factor. K-factor for pregnant patients was compared to the k-factor for adults of standard physique with a one-sample t-test. Bivariate and multivariable analyses were performed for patient and CT predictors of k-factor.

RESULTS

A total of 534 patients were included. The mean k-factor for all patients was 0.0249 (mSv·mGy^-1·cm^-1), 78% greater than k-factor of 0.014 (p < 0.001) suggested for the general adult population. Multivariable analysis demonstrated lower k-factors with increasing pitch (p = 0.0002), patient size (p < 0.001), and scan length (p < 0.0001). The 120 kVp (p < 0.001) and 140 kVp (p = 0.0028) analyses showed a larger k-factor than 80 and 100 kVp studies combined.

CONCLUSIONS

Specific k-factor for CTPA in pregnant patients is greater than the previously used generic chest CT k-factor and should be used to estimate the effective dose for CTPA exams in pregnancy.

ESTABLISHING LOCAL DIAGNOSTIC REFERENCE LEVELS FOR ROUTINE COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY EXAMINATIONS IN JIMMA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER SOUTH WEST ETHIOPIA

The main purpose of this study was to determine local diagnostic reference level (LDRL) for Routine Computed Tomography (CT) examination in, Jimma University Medical Center (JUMC) South West Ethiopia. Retrospective study was conducted to determine LDRL for routine CT examination in JUMC. We have considered CTDIvol and DLP as dosimetric quantity based on the recommended guidelines to determine LDRLs by different international legal Authorities. The 75th percentile values of the calculated CTDIvol and DLP were proposed as LDRL. LDRL was obtained as CTDIvol, 42.97mGy, 7.76mGy, 14.32mGy, and 10.86mGy for routine brain CT, routine chest CT, routine thoraco-lumbar CT and routine abdomen CT examination respectively. Similarly the determined LDRL from DLP was 1364.15mGycm, 368.96mGycm, 853.18mGycm, and 1568.96mGycm for brain, chest, thoraco-lumbar and abdomen examination respectively. The LDRL obtained for DLP was higher compared with international DRLs; it can be reduced by coordinating effort between radiologists, technologists and medical physicist.

Development of image quality related reference doses called acceptable quality doses (AQD) in paediatric CT exams in Qatar

OBJECTIVES

To describe first experience of integrating assessment of image quality in paediatric X-ray computed tomography (CT) with analysis of the radiation dose indices to develop reference doses called acceptable quality dose (AQD).

METHODS

Image quality was scored by the radiologists at a tertiary care hospital in Qatar on a scale of 0 to 4 using the recently published scoring criteria. The patients undergoing head, chest and abdomen CT were divided in different weight groups as follows: < 5 kg, 5-< 15 kg, 15-< 30 kg, 30-< 50 kg, 50-< 80 kg and > 80 kg. The images that were clinically acceptable (score of 3) were included for assessment of median values of CTDIvol and DLP to obtain AQDs in different weight groups.

RESULTS

After initial training in image quality scoring of CT images of 49 patients by three radiologists, the study on 715 patients indicated 665 studies (93%) were clinically acceptable as per scoring criteria. The median CTDIvol values for the above weight groups were 16, 20, 22, 22, 27 and 27 mGy and the median DLP values for these weight groups were 271, 377, 463, 486, 568 and 570 mGy cm, respectively, for head CT. Similar values are presented for chest and abdomen CTs.

CONCLUSIONS

The first ever experience of starting with image quality assessment and integrating it with analysis of dose indices to obtain AQD values shall provide a workable model for others and values for comparison within the facility and in other facilities leading to optimisation.

KEY POINTS

• The first study to integrate image quality assessment with analysis of patient dose indices shows feasibility for routine practice in other centres. • The values of acceptable quality dose (AQD) were provided for head, chest and abdomen CT of children divided into weight groups rather than age. They shall act as reference values for future studies. • Verification of our findings on proportional increase in exposure parameters (CTDIvol and DLP) with weight by other investigators shall be helpful.

Radiation doses from head, neck, chest and abdominal CT examinations: an institutional dose report

PURPOSE

We aimed to obtain typical values for head, neck, chest, and abdominal computed tomography (CT) examinations from routine patients in 2018, and to review our data with national and international diagnostic reference levels (DRLs).

METHODS

Single-phase head, neck, chest, and abdominal CT scans of adults performed in 64-slice CT in 2018 were included in this study. Radiation dose parameters of CT scans were obtained from the picture archiving and communication system of our hospital. Volumetric CT dose index (CTDIvol) and dose length product (DLP) values were recorded. Effective dose (ED) and scan length was calculated. A 16 cm diameter phantom is referenced for head CT, and 32 cm diameter phantom is referenced for neck, chest, and abdominal CT. Descriptive statistics of the variables were given according to the normality testing.

RESULTS

Median CTDIvol value was 53 mGy for the head, 13.1 mGy for the neck, 8.3 mGy for the chest, and 8.6 mGy for the abdomen. Median DLP value was 988 mGy.cm for the head, 299 mGy.cm for the neck, 314 mGy.cm for the chest, and 457 mGy.cm for the abdomen. Median ED value was 2.07 mSv for the head, 1.76 mSv for the neck, 4.4 mSv for the chest, and 6.8 mSv for the abdomen. Considering national DRLs, median CTDIvol values of head, chest, and abdomen were lower, whereas median DLP and ED values of head and chest were higher. For the abdomen, the median DLP and ED values were lower.

CONCLUSION

Overall radiation dose parameters obtained in this study points out the need for optimization of head CT examinations in our institution.

Dosimetric and radiation cancer risk evaluation of high resolution thorax CT during COVID-19 outbreak

PURPOSE

The aim of this work was to evaluate the dosimetric impact of high-resolution thorax CT during COVID-19 outbreak in the University Hospital of Parma. In two months we have performed a huge number of thorax CT scans collecting effective and equivalent organ doses and evaluating also the lifetime attributable risk (LAR) of lung and other major cancers.

MATERIALS AND METHOD

From February 24th to April 28th, 3224 high-resolution thorax CT were acquired. For all patients we have examined the volumetric computed tomography dose index (CTDIvol), the dose length product (DLP), the size-specific dose estimate (SSDE) and effective dose (E103) using a dose tracking software (Radimetrics Bayer HealthCare). From the equivalent dose to organs for each patient, LAR for lung and major cancers were estimated following the method proposed in BEIR VII which considers age and sex differences.

RESULTS

Study population included 3224 patients, 1843 male and 1381 female, with an average age of 67 years. The average CTDIvol, SSDE and DLP, and E103 were 6.8 mGy, 8.7 mGy, 239 mGy·cm and 4.4 mSv respectively. The average LAR of all solid cancers was 2.1 cases per 10,000 patients, while the average LAR of leukemia was 0.2 cases per 10,000 patients. For both male and female the organ with a major cancer risk was lung.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the impressive increment in thoracic CT examinations due to COVID-19 outbreak, the high resolution low dose protocol used in our hospital guaranteed low doses and very low risk estimation in terms of LAR.

The uncertainty of thyroid dose estimate in chest CT

Dose to the thyroid from helical chest CT can vary significantly due to the random tube start point, pitch factor, thyroid position relative to the isocenter, and beam width. We used optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters (OSLDs) and an adult anthropomorphic phantom to investigate the uncertainty of thyroid dose estimate. Maximum gap or overlap in the helical beam was estimated using the above factors. Using the maximum gap/overlap over the thyroid, different possible scenarios were simulated and the degree of missed thyroid tissue by the primary beam was estimated. Results showed a variation of >30% in the average thyroid dose, and >50% if a single dosimeter was used to determine dose to the thyroid. Furthermore, measured doses were compared to those calculated by Monte Carlo simulation software, which automatically matches the anatomy of the localizer radiograph with the stylized computational phantom used for dose calculation. The difference was significant: the dose given by the Monte Carlo software was ∼50% lower than the average dose measured with the phantom in all three chest protocols. In addition, the software does not take the effect of the random tube start angle into account.

Evaluation of Impact of Factors Affecting CT Radiation Dose for Optimizing Patient Dose Levels

The dose metrics and factors influencing radiation exposure for patients undergoing head, chest, and abdominal computed tomography (CT) scans were investigated for optimization of patient dose levels. The local diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) of adult CT scans performed in our hospital were established based on 28,147 consecutive examinations, including 5510 head scans, 9091 chest scans, and 13,526 abdominal scans. Among the six CT scanners used in our hospital, four of them are 64-slice multi-detector CT units (MDCT64), and the other two have detector slices higher than 64 (MDCTH). Multivariate analysis was conducted to evaluate the effects of body size, kVp, mAs, and pitch on volume CT dose index (CTDIvol). The local DRLs expressed in terms of the 75th percentile of CTDIvol for the head, chest, and abdominal scans performed on MDCT64 were 59.32, 9.24, and 10.64 mGy, respectively. The corresponding results for MDCTH were 57.90, 7.67, and 9.86 mGy. In regard to multivariate analysis, CTDIvol showed various dependence on the predictors investigated in this study. All regression relationships have coefficient of determination (R2) larger than 0.75, indicating a good fit to the data. Overall, the research results obtained through our workflow could facilitate the modification of CT imaging procedures once the local DRLs are unusually high compared to the national DRLs.

Computed tomography diagnostic reference levels for adult brain, chest and abdominal examinations: A systematic review

OBJECTIVES

Radiation dose variation within and among Computed Tomography (CT) centres is commonly reported. This work systematically reviewed published articles on adult Diagnostic Reference Levels (DRLs) for the brain, chest and abdomen to determine the causes and extent of variation. A systematic literature search and review was performed in selected databases containing leading journals in radiography, radiology and medical physics using carefully defined search terms related to CT and DRLs. The quality of the included articles was determined using the Effective Public Health Practise Project tool for quantitative studies.

KEY FINDINGS

The 54 articles reviewed include: 45 studies using human data, 8 studies using phantom data, and one study with both human and phantom data. The main comparator in between studies was the dose indices used in reporting DRLs. DRL variations of up to a factor of 2 for the same procedure were noted in phantom studies, and up to a factor of 3 in human studies. Sources of variation include the type of scanner, the age of the scanner, differences in protocols, variations in patients, as well as variations in study design. Different combinations of dose indices were reported: volume computed tomography dose index (CTDIvol) and dose length product (DLP) (59%); DLP only (11%); weighted computed tomography dose index (CTDIw) and DLP (9%); CTDIvol only (7%); CTDIvol, DLP and effective dose (ED) (6%); CTDIw only (4%); CTDIvol, DLP and size specific dose estimate (SSDE) (1%) and CTDIw, CTDIvol and DLP (1%). The use of different dose indices limited dose comparison between studies.

CONCLUSION

The study noted a 2-3 fold variation in DRLs between studies for the same procedure. The causes of variation are reported and include study design, scanner technology and the use of different dose indices.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

There is a need for standardisation of CT DRLs in line with the International Commission on Radiological Protection recommendations to reduce dose variation and facilitate dose comparison.

Application of multiple injections of contrast agent in head and neck CT arteriovenous angiography in children: Study protocol clinical trial (SPIRIT Compliant)

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the application value of multiple injections of contrast agent in head and neck CT arteriovenous angiography in children.

METHODS

A total of 100 children aged 6 to 7 years who needed head and neck CT arteriovenous angiography were prospectively selected. They were randomly divided into a control group and a research group, with 50 children in each group. The same scanning parameters and reconstruction methods were used. The right median cubital vein was injected intravenously with the contrast agent Omnipaque (350 mg I/ml). For children in the control group, a bolus of undiluted contrast agent (dose was 2 ml/kg, upper limit was 50 ml) was injected 1 time. The arterial phase and vein phase of the head and neck vessels were scanned. For children in the research group, a contrast agent bolus diluted with saline to a concentration of 20% was first injected (dose was 1 ml/kg, upper limit was 25 ml), and then an undiluted contrast agent bolus (dose was 1 ml/kg, upper limit was 25 ml) was injected. Thresholds were used to trigger the scanning of the head and neck arterial phases. The CT image quality of the head and neck arteries and veins, radiation dose and contrast agent dose were compared between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

Subjective evaluation of CT image quality of arteries: there were 47 cases of 4 points and 3 cases of 3 points in the control group and 34 cases of 4 points and 16 cases of 3 points in the research group. Subjective evaluation of CT image quality of veins: there were 47 cases of 4 points and 3 cases of 3 points in the control group and 5 cases of 4 points, 42 cases of 3 points and 3 cases of 2 points in the research group. The CT value of brain arterial vessel enhancement was higher in the control group than the research group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < .05). The CT value of vein enhancement was higher in the control group than the research group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < .05). The X-ray dose in the research group was 51% lower than that in the control group; the contrast agent dose in the research group was 44% lower than that in the control group.

CONCLUSION

For the head and neck enhanced CT examination of children, the method of first bolus injection of 20% diluted contrast agent and later bolus injection of undiluted contrast agent can clearly demonstrate the head and neck arteries and veins one time, reducing the X-ray dose and contrast agent dose, which has clinical practical value in the enhanced CT examination of children with head and neck disease.

Spine Surgery Supported by Augmented Reality

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective, case-based, observational study.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate how microscope-based augmented reality (AR) support can be utilized in various types of spine surgery.

METHODS

In 42 spinal procedures (12 intra- and 8 extradural tumors, 7 other intradural lesions, 11 degenerative cases, 2 infections, and 2 deformities) AR was implemented using operating microscope head-up displays (HUDs). Intraoperative low-dose computed tomography was used for automatic registration. Nonlinear image registration was applied to integrate multimodality preoperative images. Target and risk structures displayed by AR were defined in preoperative images by automatic anatomical mapping and additional manual segmentation.

RESULTS

AR could be successfully applied in all 42 cases. Low-dose protocols ensured a low radiation exposure for registration scanning (effective dose cervical 0.29 ± 0.17 mSv, thoracic 3.40 ± 2.38 mSv, lumbar 3.05 ± 0.89 mSv). A low registration error (0.87 ± 0.28 mm) resulted in a reliable AR representation with a close matching of visualized objects and reality, distinctly supporting anatomical orientation in the surgical field. Flexible AR visualization applying either the microscope HUD or video superimposition, including the ability to selectively activate objects of interest, as well as different display modes allowed a smooth integration in the surgical workflow, without disturbing the actual procedure. On average, 7.1 ± 4.6 objects were displayed visualizing target and risk structures reliably.

CONCLUSIONS

Microscope-based AR can be applied successfully to various kinds of spinal procedures. AR improves anatomical orientation in the surgical field supporting the surgeon, as well as it offers a potential tool for education.

Use of Multiphase CT Protocols in 18 Countries: Appropriateness and Radiation Doses

Purpose:

To assess the frequency, appropriateness, and radiation doses associated with multiphase computed tomography (CT) protocols for routine chest and abdomen–pelvis examinations in 18 countries.

Materials and Methods:

In collaboration with the International Atomic Energy Agency, multi-institutional data on clinical indications, number of scan phases, scan parameters, and radiation dose descriptors (CT dose–index volume; dose–length product [DLP]) were collected for routine chest (n = 1706 patients) and abdomen–pelvis (n = 426 patients) CT from 18 institutions in Asia, Africa, and Europe. Two radiologists scored the need for each phase based on clinical indications (1 = not indicated, 2 = probably indicated, 3 = indicated). We surveyed 11 institutions for their practice regarding single-phase and multiphase CT examinations. Data were analyzed with the Student t test.

Results:

Most institutions use multiphase protocols for routine chest (10/18 institutions) and routine abdomen–pelvis (10/11 institutions that supplied data for abdomen–pelvis) CT examinations. Most institutions (10/11) do not modify scan parameters between different scan phases. Respective total DLP for 1-, 2-, and 3-phase routine chest CT was 272, 518, and 820 mGy·cm, respectively. Corresponding values for 1- to 5-phase routine abdomen–pelvis CT were 400, 726, 1218, 1214, and 1458 mGy cm, respectively. For multiphase CT protocols, there were no differences in scan parameters and radiation doses between different phases for either chest or abdomen–pelvis CT ( P = 0.40-0.99). Multiphase CT examinations were unnecessary in 100% of routine chest CT and in 63% of routine abdomen–pelvis CT examinations.

Conclusions:

Multiphase scan protocols for the routine chest and abdomen–pelvis CT examinations are unnecessary, and their use increases radiation dose.

Size-Specific Dose Estimates Based on Water-Equivalent Diameter and Effective Diameter in Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography

BACKGROUND To determine the difference in size-specific dose estimates (SSDEs), separately based on effective diameter (deff) and water equivalent diameter (dw) of the central slice of the scan range in computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA). MATERIAL AND METHODS There were 134 patients who underwent CTCA examination, were electronically retrieved. SSDEs (SSDEdeff and SSDEdw) were calculated using 2 approaches: deff and dw. The median SSDEs and mean absolute relative difference of SSDEs were calculated. Linear regression model was used to assess the absolute relative difference of SSDEs based on the ratio of deff to dw. RESULTS The median values of SSDEdeff and SSDEdw were 18.26 mGy and 20.56 mGy, respectively (P<0.01). The former was about 10.08% smaller than the latter. The mean absolute relative difference of SSDEs was 10.48%, ranging from 0.33% to 24.16%. A considerably positive correlation was found between the absolute relative difference of SSDEs and the ratio of deff to dw (R²=0.9561, r=0.979, P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS The value of SSDEdeff was smaller by an average of about 10.08% than SSDEdw in CTCA, and the absolute relative difference increased linearly with the ratio of effective diameter to water equivalent diameter.

Patients undergoing recurrent CT scans: assessing the magnitude

OBJECTIVES

To assess percent of patients undergoing multiple CT exams that leads to cumulative effective dose (CED) of ≥ 100 mSv and determine their age distribution.

METHODS

Data was retrieved retrospectively from established radiation dose monitoring systems by setting the threshold value of 100 mSv at four institutions covering 324 hospitals. The number of patients with CED ≥ 100 mSv only from recurrent CT exams during a feasible time period between 1 and 5 years was identified. Age and gender distribution of these patients were assessed to identify the magnitude of patients in the relatively lower age group of ≤ 50 years.

RESULTS

Of the 2.5 million (2,504,585) patients who underwent 4.8 million (4,819,661) CT exams during the period of between 1 and 5 years, a total of 33,407 (1.33%) patients received a CED of ≥ 100 mSv with an overall median CED of 130.3 mSv and maximum of 1185 mSv. Although the vast majority (72-86%) of patients are > 50 years of age, nearly 20% (13.4 to 28%) are ≤ 50 years. The minimum time to accrue 100 mSv was a single day at all four institutions, an unreported finding to date.

CONCLUSIONS

We are in an unprecedented era, where patients undergoing multiple CT exams and receiving CED ≥ 100 mSv are not uncommon. While underscoring the need for imaging appropriateness, the consideration of the number and percent of patients with high exposures and related clinical necessities creates an urgent need for the industry to develop CT scanners and protocols with sub-mSv radiation dose, a goal that has been lingering.

KEY POINTS

• We are in an era where patients undergoing multiple CT exams during a short span of 1 to 5 years are not uncommon and a sizable fraction among them are below 50 years of age. • This leads to cumulative radiation dose to individual patients at which radiation effects are of real concern. • There is an urgent need for the industry to develop CT scanners with sub-mSv radiation dose, a goal that has been lingering.

Patients undergoing recurrent CT exams: assessment of patients with non-malignant diseases, reasons for imaging and imaging appropriateness

OBJECTIVE

To determine percent of patients without malignancy and ≤ 40 years of age with high cumulative radiation doses through recurrent CT exams and assess imaging appropriateness.

METHODS

From the cohort of patients who received cumulative effective dose (CED) of ≥ 100 mSv over a 5-year period, a sub-set was identified with non-malignant disease. The top 50 clinical indications leading to multiple CTs were determined. Clinical decision support (CDS) system scores were analyzed using a widely adopted standard of 1-3 (red) as "not usually appropriate," 4-6 (yellow) "may or may not be appropriate," and 7-9 (green) "usually appropriate." Clinicians reviewed patient records to assess compliance with appropriate use criteria (AUC).

RESULTS

9.6% of patients in our series were with non-malignant conditions and 1.4% with age ≤ 40 years. CDS scores (rounded) were 2% red, 38% yellow, 27% green, and 33% unscored CTs. Clinical society guidelines for CT exams, wherever available, were followed in 87.5 to 100% of cases. AUCs were not available for several clinical indications as also referral guidelines for serial CT imaging. More than half of CT exams were unrelated to follow-up of a primary chronic disease.

CONCLUSIONS

We are faced with a situation wherein patients in age ≤ 40 years require or are thought to require many CT exams over the course of a few years but the radiation risk creates concern. There is a fair number of conditions for which AUC are not available. Suggested solutions include development of CT scanners with lesser radiation dose and further development of appropriateness criteria.

KEY POINTS

We are faced with a situation wherein patients in age group 0-40 years and with non-malignant diagnosis require or are thought to require many CT exams over the course of a few years. More than half of CT exams were unrelated to follow-up of a primary chronic disease. Imaging guidelines and appropriateness use criteria are not available for many conditions. Wherever available, they are for initial work-up and diagnosis and there is a lack of guidance on serial CT imaging.

Analysis of Computed Tomography Radiation Doses Used for Lung Cancer Screening Scans

IMPORTANCE

The American College of Radiology (ACR) has recognized the importance of minimizing radiation doses used for lung cancer screening (LCS) computed tomography (CT). However, without standard protocols, doses could still be unnecessarily high, reducing screening margin of benefit.

OBJECTIVE

To characterize LCS CT radiation doses and identify factors explaining variation.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

We prospectively collected LCS examination dose metrics, from 2016 to 2017, at US institutions in the University of California, San Francisco International Dose Registry. Institution-level factors were collected through baseline survey. Mixed-effects linear and logistic regression models were estimated using forward variable selection. Results are presented as percentage excess dose and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The analysis was conducted between 2018 and 2019.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Log-transformed measures of (1) mean volume CT dose index (CTDIvol, mGy), reflecting the average radiation dose per slice; (2) mean effective dose (ED, mSv), reflecting the total dose received and estimated future cancer risk; (3) proportion of CT scans using radiation doses above ACR benchmarks (CTDIvol >3 mGy, ED >1 mSv); and (4) proportion of CT scans using radiation doses above 75th percentile of registry doses (CTDIvol >2.7 mGy, ED >1.4 mSv).

RESULTS

Data were collected for 12 529 patients undergoing LCS CT scans performed at 72 institutions. Overall, 7232 participants (58%) were men, and the median age was 65 years (interquartile range [IQR], 60-70). Of 72 institutions, 15 (21%) had median CTDIvol and 47 (65%) had median ED above ACR guidelines. Institutions allowing any radiologists to establish protocols had 44% higher mean CTDIvol (mean dose difference [MDD], 44%; 95% CI, 19%-69%) and 27% higher mean ED (MDD, 27%; 95% CI, 5%-50%) vs those limiting who established protocols. Institutions allowing any radiologist to establish protocols had higher odds of examinations exceeding ACR CTDIvol guidelines (OR, 12.0; 95% CI, 2.0-71.4), and 75th percentile of registry CTDIvol (OR, 19.0; 95% CI, 1.9-186.7) or ED (OR, 8.5; 95% CI, 1.7-42.9). Having lead radiologists establish protocols resulted in lower odds of doses exceeding ACR ED guidelines (OR, 0.01; 95% CI, 0.001-0.1). Employing external vs internal medical physicists was associated with increased odds of exceeding ACR CTDIvol guidelines (OR, 6.1; 95% CI, 1.8-20.8). Having medical physicists establish protocols was associated with decreased odds of exceeding 75th percentile of registry CTDIvol (OR, 0.09; 95% CI, 0.01-0.59). Institutions reporting protocol updates as needed had 27% higher mean CTDIvol (MDD, 27%; 95% CI, 8%-45%).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Facilities varied in LCS CT radiation dose distributions. Institutions limiting protocol creation to lead radiologists and having internal medical physicists had lower doses.

Reliable navigation registration in cranial and spine surgery based on intraoperative computed tomography

OBJECTIVE

Low registration errors are an important prerequisite for reliable navigation, independent of its use in cranial or spinal surgery. Regardless of whether navigation is used for trajectory alignment in biopsy or implant procedures, or for sophisticated augmented reality applications, all depend on a correct registration of patient space and image space. In contrast to fiducial, landmark, or surface matching–based registration, the application of intraoperative imaging allows user-independent automatic patient registration, which is less error prone. The authors’ aim in this paper was to give an overview of their experience using intraoperative CT (iCT) scanning for automatic registration with a focus on registration accuracy and radiation exposure.

METHODS

A total of 645 patients underwent iCT scanning with a 32-slice movable CT scanner in combination with navigation for trajectory alignment in biopsy and implantation procedures (n = 222) and for augmented reality (n = 437) in cranial and spine procedures (347 craniotomies and 42 transsphenoidal, 56 frameless stereotactic, 59 frame-based stereotactic, and 141 spinal procedures). The target registration error was measured using skin fiducials that were not part of the registration procedure. The effective dose was calculated by multiplying the dose length product with conversion factors.

RESULTS

Among all 1281 iCT scans obtained, 1172 were used for automatic patient registration (645 initial registration scans and 527 repeat iCT scans). The overall mean target registration error was 0.86 ± 0.38 mm (± SD) (craniotomy, 0.88 ± 0.39 mm; transsphenoidal, 0.92 ± 0.39 mm; frameless, 0.74 ± 0.39 mm; frame-based, 0.84 ± 0.34 mm; and spinal, 0.80 ± 0.28 mm). Compared with standard diagnostic scans, a distinct reduction of the effective dose could be achieved using low-dose protocols for the initial registration scan with mean effective doses of 0.06 ± 0.04 mSv for cranial, 0.50 ± 0.09 mSv for cervical, 4.12 ± 2.13 mSv for thoracic, and 3.37 ± 0.93 mSv for lumbar scans without impeding registration accuracy.

CONCLUSIONS

Reliable automatic patient registration can be achieved using iCT scanning. Low-dose protocols ensured a low radiation exposure for the patient. Low-dose scanning had no negative effect on navigation accuracy.