Nephrotoxicity from contrast material in renal insufficiency: ionic versus nonionic agents

Contrast Media-Different Types of Contrast Media, Their History, Chemical Properties, and Relative Nephrotoxicity

History of contrast dates back to the 1890s, with the invention of the radiograph. Nephrotoxicity has been a main limitation in ideal contrast media (CM). High-osmolar contrast media no longer are in clinical use due to overwhelming evidence supporting greater nephrotoxicity with these CM compared with current CM. Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) remains a common cause of in-hospital acute kidney injury. The choice contrast agent is determined mainly by cost and institution practice. This review focuses on the history, chemical properties, and experimental and clinical studies on the various groups of CM and their role in CIN.

Effectiveness of contrast-associated acute kidney injury prevention methods; a systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Different methods to prevent contrast-associated acute kidney injury (CA-AKI) have been proposed in recent years. We performed a mixed treatment comparison to evaluate and rank suggested interventions.

METHODS

A comprehensive Systematic review and a Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials was completed. Results were tabulated and graphically represented using a network diagram; forest plots and league tables were shown to rank treatments by the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA). A stacked bar chart rankogram was generated. We performed main analysis with 200 RCTs and three analyses according to contrast media and high or normal baseline renal profile that includes 173, 112 & 60 RCTs respectively.

RESULTS

We have included 200 trials with 42,273 patients and 44 interventions. The primary outcome was CI-AKI, defined as ≥25% relative increase or ≥ 0.5 mg/dl increase from baseline creatinine one to 5 days post contrast exposure. The top ranked interventions through different analyses were Allopurinol, Prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) & Oxygen (0.9647, 0.7809 & 0.7527 in the main analysis). Comparatively, reference treatment intravenous hydration was ranked lower but better than Placebo (0.3124 VS 0.2694 in the main analysis).

CONCLUSION

Multiple CA-AKI preventive interventions have been tested in RCTs. This network evaluates data for all the explored options. The results suggest that some options (particularly allopurinol, PGE1 & Oxygen) deserve further evaluation in a larger well-designed RCTs.

Sodium bicarbonate, N-acetylcysteine, and saline for prevention of radiocontrast-induced nephropathy. A comparison of 3 regimens for protecting contrast-induced nephropathy in patients undergoing coronary procedures. A single-center prospective controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Several protective therapies have been developed to prevent contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN). We aimed to investigate the efficacy of sodium bicarbonate by comparing 2 other regimens, including combination of N-acetylcysteine (NAC) plus sodium chloride and sodium chloride alone, to prevent CIN in patients undergoing cardiovascular procedures.

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled 264 patients who were scheduled for cardiovascular procedures and had a baseline creatinine level >1.2 mg/dL. The patients were assigned 1 of 3 prophylactic regimens: infusion of sodium bicarbonate, sodium chloride, sodium chloride plus oral NAC (600 mg bid). Contrast-induced nephropathy was defined as an increase in serum creatinine level >25% or 0.5 mg/dL after 48 hours.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences among groups regarding baseline demographic properties and nephropathy risk factors. The change in creatinine clearance was significantly better in the sodium bicarbonate group than other 2 groups (P = .007). The incidence of CIN was significantly lower in the sodium bicarbonate group (4.5%) compared with sodium chloride alone (13.6%, P = .036) and tended to be lower than in the combination group (12.5%, P = .059). After adjusting the Mehran nephropathy risk score, the risk of CIN significantly reduced with sodium bicarbonate compared with sodium chloride alone (adjusted risk ratio 0.29, P = .043).

CONCLUSIONS

Hydration with sodium bicarbonate provides better protection against CIN than the sodium chloride infusion does alone. Combination therapy of NAC plus sodium chloride did not offer additional benefit over hydration with sodium chloride alone.

Prevention of Contrast-Induced Nephropathy in the Emergency Department

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Contrast-induced nephropathy is the third leading cause of hospital-acquired acute renal failure. Expanded use of contrast-enhanced imaging exposes an ever-widening number of patients to this renal toxin. We perform an evidence-based emergency medicine review comparing different therapies to prevent contrast-induced nephropathy. We limit our review to prophylactic therapies that are practical for an emergency department setting.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library for randomized trials comparing a wide range of medications to prevent contrast-induced nephropathy. We defined contrast-induced nephropathy by a commonly used surrogate measure of renal failure: a 25% or 0.5 mg/dL absolute increase in serum creatinine level from baseline 48 to 72 hours postcontrast. We limited our review to only trials for patients with baseline renal insufficiency, who are most at risk for contrast-induced nephropathy. We excluded prophylactic protocols requiring more than 2 hours precontrast to initiate and any trials of experimental medications or those that required invasive monitoring. We used standard criteria to appraise the quality of published trials.

RESULTS

We found 7 randomized trials; 3 using N-acetylcysteine, 2 using theophylline, and 1 each using bicarbonate and ascorbic acid. Although many of these trials showed statistically significant reductions in the risk for contrast-induced nephropathy, none were sufficiently powered to detect reductions in mortality rate or the need for dialytic therapy.

CONCLUSION

Evidence from randomized trials shows that these interventions (theophylline, bicarbonate, and ascorbic acid) under review were appropriate to an ED setting and decreased the risk of contrast-induced nephropathy. The case for the effectiveness (N-acetylcysteine) was less certain.

Head and neck imaging: The role of CT and MRI

High-resolution computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have become indispensable tools for the evaluation of conditions involving the head and neck. Complex anatomic structures and regions, such as the orbit, skull base, paranasal sinuses, deep spaces of the neck, larynx, and lymph nodes, require that the radiologist be familiar with the imaging modalities available and their appropriate applications. The purpose of this article is to review the techniques of CT and MRI and the roles they play in clinical practice, including head and neck disorders.

Diagnostic pathways in acute pulmonary embolism: recommendations of the PIOPED II investigators

PURPOSE

To formulate comprehensive recommendations for the diagnostic approach to patients with suspected pulmonary embolism, based on randomized trials.

METHODS

Diagnostic management recommendations were formulated based on results of the Prospective Investigation of Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis II (PIOPED II) and outcome studies.

RESULTS

The PIOPED II investigators recommend stratification of all patients with suspected pulmonary embolism according to an objective clinical probability assessment. D-dimer should be measured by the quantitative rapid enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and the combination of a negative D-dimer with a low or moderate clinical probability can safely exclude pulmonary embolism in many patients. If pulmonary embolism is not excluded, contrast-enhanced computed tomographic pulmonary angiography (CT angiography) in combination with venous phase imaging (CT venography), is recommended by most PIOPED II investigators, although CT angiography plus clinical assessment is an option. In pregnant women, ventilation/perfusion scans are recommended by many as the first imaging test following D-dimer and perhaps venous ultrasound. In patients with discordant findings of clinical assessment and CT angiograms or CT angiogram/CT venogram, further evaluation may be necessary.

CONCLUSION

The sequence for diagnostic test in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism depends on the clinical circumstances.

Epidemiology and prognostic implications of contrast-induced nephropathy

Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN), usually defined as an increase in serum creatinine of 0.5 mg/dL (44.2 mumol/L), or a 25% increase from the baseline value 48 hours after the procedure, is a common and potentially serious complication of the use of iodinated contrast media in patients at risk of acute renal injury. It is an important cause of hospital-acquired renal failure, responsible for approximately 11% of cases. CIN may be difficult to distinguish from cholesterol embolization, another cause of postprocedure renal impairment. The reported incidence of CIN varies depending on the patient population studied. The impact of postprocedural renal impairment on clinical outcomes has been evaluated most extensively in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. CIN is associated with increased mortality both in hospital and at 1 year. A higher incidence of in-hospital and late cardiovascular events, as well as longer hospital stays, has been reported in patients developing CIN. In a small proportion of patients, CIN is severe enough to require dialysis, and these patients have a particularly poor prognosis. Many of the risk markers for CIN are also predictive of a worse prognosis.

Contrast-induced nephropathy: definition, epidemiology, and patients at risk

Radiological procedures utilizing intravascular iodinated contrast media injections are being widely applied for both diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. This has resulted in an increasing incidence of procedure-related contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN). The definition of CIN includes absolute (> or = 0.5 mg/dl) or relative increase (> or = 25%) in serum creatinine at 48-72 h after exposure to a contrast agent compared to baseline serum creatinine values, when alternative explanations for renal impairment have been excluded. Although the risk of renal function impairment associated with radiological procedures is low (0.6-2.3%) in the general population, it may be very high in selected patient subsets (up to 20%), especially in patients with underlying cardiovascular disease. This review provides information on the known risk factors for the development of CIN, and completes with describing user-friendly CIN risk score based on the readily available information.

Prevention and Treatment of Contrast-Induced Nephropathy

Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) is a well-known complication of therapeutic and diagnostic procedures requiring contrast administration and accounts for 10 to 12% of acute renal failure in hospitalized patients. Although the incidence of this complication is relatively low, its consequences can be catastrophic. The development of CIN is associated with increased hospital length of stay, an increased requirement for acute dialysis, and an increased risk of death. Preexisting renal dysfunction, age, diabetes, congestive heart failure, and volume of administered contrast are all associated with a risk of developing CIN. Despite a large number of clinical trials that have evaluated prophylaxis strategies for CIN, only the use of hemofiltration and N-acetylcysteine (NAC) in specific subgroups of patients have been shown to reduce dialysis requirement and mortality in patients undergoing angiographic procedures. In this review we will discuss the epidemiology and the risk factors for CIN and the evidence for commonly employed prophylaxis strategies, and we will provide general recommendations with respect to CIN prevention and management.

Risk of Nephropathy after Intravenous Administration of Contrast Material: A Critical Literature Analysis

PURPOSE

To assess the risk of nephropathy after administration of contrast material by reviewing the published literature on intravenous contrast material administration and by separating reports with appropriate control measures from those without such measures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The MEDLINE database was searched for articles published from October 1966 to September 2004 that contained the phrases "contrast," "contrast medium," "contrast media," or "radiocontrast" and any of the words or phrases "nephrotoxicity," "nephropathy," kidney failure," or "renal failure." The identified publications were reviewed and limited to original clinical series. Studies were categorized according to the route of contrast material administration. Those in which an identifiable group of patients received contrast material intravenously were further evaluated to determine which studies compared results with those from a control group of patients who did not receive contrast material.

RESULTS

Only 40 (1.3%) of 3081 publications had patients who received contrast material intravenously. Of these, only two publications had control groups of patients who received no contrast material. The incidence of postcontrast nephropathy in these two series was not substantially different from that in the control groups.

CONCLUSION

Properly controlled clinical studies of intravenously administered radiographic contrast media fail to demonstrate renal damage.

Prevention of radiocontrast-induced nephropathy

Radiocontrast administration is a common cause of hospital-acquired acute renal failure. It is associated with significant in-hospital and long-term morbidity and mortality and increases the costs of medical care by at least extending the hospital stay. Although individuals with normal renal function generally are not considered to be at particular risk, patients with preexisting renal failure are much more likely to experience this complication after radiocontrast agent administration. Typically, serum creatinine levels begin to increase at 48 to 72 hours, peak at 3 to 5 days, and return to baseline within another 3 to 5 days. A variety of therapeutic interventions, including saline hydration, diuretics, mannitol, calcium channel antagonists, theophylline, endothelin receptor antagonists, and dopamine, have been used in an attempt to prevent radiocontrast-induced nephropathy. Of these, saline hydration is the sole efficacious therapy to protect against radiocontrast-induced nephropathy. Recent advances have examined the impact of fenoldopam (dopamine-1 [DA-1] receptor; DA-1 agonist), the antioxidant N-acetylcysteine, iso-osmolar contrast agents, hemodialysis, and hemofiltration in ameliorating radiocontrast-induced nephropathy. This review focuses on current interventions to ameliorate radiocontrast-induced acute renal failure and provides an analysis of some of the recent studies conducted to halt radiocontrast-induced nephropathy.

Radiocontrast-induced nephropathy

Radiocontrast administration remains the third leading cause of hospital-acquired acute renal failure. Clinically, radiocontrast-induced nephropathy (RIN) is defined as a sudden decline in renal function after radiocontrast administration. Typically, the serum creatinine level begins to increase at 24 to 72 hours after the administration of contrast, peaks at 3 to 5 days, and requires another 3 to 5 days to return to baseline. RIN increases the incidence of life-threatening complications such as sepsis, bleeding, and respiratory failure and increases the cost of medical care by extending the hospital stay. The increased mortality associated with acute renal failure encountered in this scenario calls for a heightened awareness of the diagnosis and prevention of RIN. Whereas individuals with healthy renal function are not generally considered to be at particular risk for RIN, patients with preexisting renal insufficiency and diabetes mellitus are much more likely to experience acute renal failure after contrast administration. In the past, a variety of therapeutic interventions have been used to prevent or attenuate RIN, including saline hydration, diuretics, mannitol, calcium channel antagonists, theophylline, endothelin receptor antagonists, hemodialysis, and dopamine. More recently, studies demonstrate a positive impact of fenoldopam (dopamine-1 receptor, dopamine-1 agonist) and the antioxidant N-acetylcysteine in ameliorating RIN. This article discusses the pathophysiology, risk factors, and prevention of RIN.

Are referring clinicians aware of patients at risk from intravenous injection of iodinated contrast media?

AIM

The purpose of our study was to assess the level of awareness of referring clinicians to populations at risk for complications of intravascular administration of iodinated contrast media.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Two hundred and three physicians from three university hospitals completed an anonymous questionnaire regarding risk factors and contraindications to the intravenous administration of iodinated contrast media. The questionnaire included medical conditions with increased risk for anaphylactoid reaction (asthma, hay fever and food allergy) as well as chemotoxic (ischaemic heart disease, phaeochromocytoma and myasthenia gravis) adverse reactions, some with dependence on renal function (metformin treatment, diabetes mellitus and multiple myeloma). Two additional multiple-choice questions addressed pre-medication protocols and risk of nephrotoxicity in diabetic patients.

RESULTS

Asthma, food allergy and hay fever were recognized as risk factors by 81.3%, 77.8% and 61.6% of respondents respectively, while ischaemic heart disease, phaeochromocytoma and myasthenia gravis were defined as such only by 9.8%, 30.0% and 28.6% respectively. Metformin treatment, diabetes mellitus and multiple myeloma, in the presence of normal renal function, were considered as risk factors by 46.3%, 38.9% and 58.1% of respondents respectively. One of the generally accepted pre-medication protocols was selected by 89.8%. The risk of nephrotoxicity in a diabetic patient was correctly assessed by 63.5% of respondents.

CONCLUSION

We found a relatively high awareness among referring clinicians of a potential anaphylactoid reaction and nephrotoxicity due to iodinated contrast media. However, additional chemotoxic adverse reactions are less well known. Future efforts to improve communication between clinicians and radiologists should be focused in this direction.

Prediction and prevention of contrast nephropathy

Over the last 10 years, the main advances in RCN have come in our ability to predict outcomes for an individual patient. Treatment trials have been almost all uniformly disappointing. Recent positive trials with acetylcysteine and PGE1 will require confirmation in larger trials that are adequately powered for meaningful end points in the PCI population. In the meantime, adequate prehydration and maintenance of post-PCI urine flow rates of > 150 mL/min remain the most prudent measures. As the population ages, breakthroughs with respect to new contrast agents or effective prevention measures will be needed to offer PCI to the spectrum of patients at risk for renal injury.

Renal effects of cardiac angiography with different low-osmolar contrast media

The aim of this study was to evaluate the renal effects of cardiac angiography performed with three low-osmolar contrast media (CM): iopromide (IPR), ioversol (IVR) and ioxaglate (IOX). IPR and IVR are non-ionic CM, IOX is an ionic CM. Different parameters of renal function were determined before and 6, 24, 48, 72 hrs after angiography in 45 patients: 15 patients were examined with IPR, 15 with IVR and 15 with IOX. Glomerular effects--Plasma creatinine increased slightly at the 24th hour after IVR and IOX and at 48 hours after IOP. A significant increase in plasma beta2-microglobulin was observed, at the same time, only after IOX. A significant decrease in creatinine clearance was found at 6 hours after IOX. No significant variations in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and in effective renal plasma flow were found at 48 hours after cardiac angiography; while filtration fraction was significantly reduced after IOP and IOX. Tubular effects--A marked decrease in sodium clearance and a relevant increase of urinary activities of different tubular enzymes were found after cardiac angiography with all CM, but were more evident after the ionic CM IOX, than after the two non-ionic agents. These tubular effects reached the maximum between 6 and 24 hours and returned to baseline within 72 hrs after cardiac angiography. In conclusion, slight glomerular effects were observed mainly after IOX. A reversible tubular malfunction was found with the three low-osmolar CM and was more evident after ionic CM IOX. thus suggesting that other mechanisms, besides osmolarity, play a role in tubular toxicity due to CM. In no patient did the glomerular and tubular effects of CM have a clinical relevance.

Effects of dopamine and aminophylline on contrast-induced acute renal failure after coronary angioplasty in patients with preexisting renal insufficiency

In phase 1 of this study, 60 patients undergoing coronary angioplasty were randomized to receive saline, dopamine, or aminophylline; the overall incidence of contrast-induced renal failure was 38%, without difference among the 3 groups. In phase 2 of this study, 72 patients with established contrast-induced renal failure were randomized to receive saline or dopamine; dopamine had a deleterious effect on the severity of renal failure, prolonging the course.

[What is reliable in prevention of contrast medium-induced nephropathy?]

Nephropathy is one of the most important side effects of radiocontrast in patients with impaired renal function. Incidence is reported from 20% to 100% depending on underlying disease. For prevention of radiocontrast nephropathy a large number of substances were investigated in experimental and clinical studies. Clinical relevance of this findings will be assessed by this article. In summary of these studies hydration is the most relevant and significant measure for prevention of radiocontrast nephropathy in patients at risk (i.e. serum creatinine > 1.5 mg/dl). 1 ml/kg body weight/h with 0.45% NaCl 12 h before and after administration of radiocontrast should be supplied. Hemodialysis is recommended if impaired renal function (serum creatinine > 3.5 mg/dl) is accompanied by additional risk factors, e.g. diabetes mellitus. The impact of dialysis therapy is not clarified by clinical studies.

MR assessment of iodinated contrast-medium-induced nephropathy in rats using ultrasmall particles of iron oxide

The purpose of this study was to determine the diagnostic value of ultrasmall particles of iron oxide (USPIO)-enhanced MR imaging at different concentrations to evaluate experimental nephropathy. This study was conducted in 23 uninephrectomized rats using a model of iodinated contrast media-induced renal failure. Eleven rats received selective intra-arterial renal administration of diatrizoate (370 mg I/ml) and were compared to two control groups, including five animals injected with isotonic saline and seven noninjected animals. MR imaging was performed 28 hours after the procedure, including T1- and T2-weighted images before and after intravenous administration of successively 5 mumol Fe/kg and 60 mumol/kg of USPIO. Results were interpreted qualitatively and quantitatively with respect to pathologic data, and differences were studied statistically. The maximal signal intensity decrease was noted in normal kidneys in cortex (-65 +/- 4%) and medulla (-84 +/- 5%) on T2-weighted images after injection of 60 mumol/kg of USPIO. At this dose, diseased kidneys displayed less signal intensity decrease than normal kidneys on T2-weighted images (p = .05). Moreover, qualitative analysis showed that the highest sensitivity and specificity to diagnose kidney involvement were obtained with T2-weighted MR images (75% and 91%, respectively) when 60 mumol/kg of USPIO were used (p < .01). USPIO should be useful for in vivo evaluation of the severity of experimentally induced iodinated contrast media renal impairment in animals.

Effects of the low-osmolality contrast medium ioversol (Optiray) on renal function in a geriatric population

PURPOSE

To assess the incidence of nephrotoxicity following i.v. injection of the iodinated low-osmolality contrast medium ioversol 300 (Optiray) in a geriatric population compared with a control group aged under 60 years, neither group presenting any associated risk factors.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

CT with i.v. bolus injection of ioversol 300 mg I/ml was performed at a mean dose of 1.36+/-0.06 ml/kg (range 1-2 ml/kg b.w.) in 47 patients aged over 69 years. Serum creatinine level was measured and creatinine clearance was calculated at 24, 48 and 72 h after the examination, and compared to a reference serum creatinine value taken before CT. The findings were compared with a control group of 44 patients aged under 60 years.

RESULTS

No significant increase in serum creatinine (+0.6 mmol/l) or in creatinine clearance (+0.7 ml/min) was found during the course of 3 days after the injection. Only one patient (aged 82) presented an increase of 25% in serum creatinine (109 mmol/l).

CONCLUSION

The trial did not demonstrate any significant difference between the 2 groups, although the elderly patients had a subclinical renal impairment revealed by the decrease of the initial creatinine clearance. The use of low-osmolality ioversol makes it possible to perform examination with an iodinated contrast agent without increasing the incidence of nephrotoxicity in elderly subjects.

Radiographic imaging modalities for the patient in the emergency department with abdominal complaints

The emergency physician should be aware of the sensitivity and specificity of any radiologic study being considered. Radiographic examinations should be used to answer specific questions raised by the history and physical examination. The need to obtain a given radiologic evaluation should be based on the potential information it may reveal and the likelihood that this information will alter patient care. This cost-effective approach minimizes unnecessary radiation exposure and has been advocated by many authorities. The emergency physician should resist the "knee jerk" tendency to order radiographs to reassure himself or herself of the safety of the patient at discharge. Documentational and legal concerns are equally invalid reasons, as is the feeling that "it's what we always order for patients with this abdominal complaint." A given study may be indicated if the yield is acceptable and treatment of the patient may be altered by the results.

Comparison of iodixanol and ioxaglate for adult aortography and renal/visceral angiography: a phase III clinical trial

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

We investigated whether iodixanol offers improved safety or tolerance compared with ioxaglate and evaluated whether iodixanol-enhanced radiographs are diagnostically comparable or superior to those produced with ioxaglate. Iodixanol is a new isosmotic hexa-iodinated nonionic contrast agent being evaluated for intravascular use.

METHODS

Fifty-four adult patients undergoing renal or visceral angiography, aortography, or both were enrolled in a prospective, randomized, double-blind, two-center study in which iodixanol and ioxaglate were compared. Subjects were monitored for adverse events, injection-associated discomfort, and changes in laboratory parameters and vital signs. Efficacy was measured by the overall quality of angiographic enhancement.

RESULTS

No serious adverse events occurred during this trial. Mild-to-moderate adverse events were more common in patients receiving ioxaglate (p = .041). Injection-associated pain was reported by three patients receiving ioxaglate and none receiving iodixanol (p = .093). Clinical laboratory and vital-sign data showed no differences between groups, and there was no difference in the overall quality of angiographic visualization (p = .711).

CONCLUSION

Iodixanol resulted in improved safety and patient tolerability while providing images of equivalent diagnostic efficacy compared with ioxaglate.

Glomerular and tubular effects of contrast media diatrizoate and iopromide

The aim of this study is to evaluate the nephrotoxicity of two contrast media (CM), with different physicochemical characteristics: diatrizoate (ionic high-osmolar), iopromide (nonionic low-osmolar). Intravenous urography was performed in 34 patients: 17 were examined with diatrizoate and 17 with iopromide, randomly assigned. Different parameters of glomerular and tubular function were measured before and at 6, 24, and 48 h after urography. Both contrast media induced a reversible increase of urine enzymes, which was significantly higher after diatrizoate. In particular, diatrizoate determined a relevant increase of brush border enzymes gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and of cytosolic enzyme lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), while, after iopromide increases of urinary enzymes were less evident and were significant only for GGT and ALP. In addition, diatrizoate affected other tubular functions (clearances of phosphorus and uric acid) and slightly decreased glomerular function in a few patients. In no case did these glomerular and tubular effects have a clinical relevance. In conclusion, the nonionic low-osmolar contrast medium iopromide appeared less nephrotoxic than diatrizoate. The cost-benefit ratio needs further examination.

Protection from the nephrotoxicity of contrast dye

Previous studies have reported a 4%-50% incidence of acute renal failure (ARF) following the use of radiocontrast media in patients with preexisting chronic renal insufficiency. In these studies, ARF was defined as a rise of the serum creatinine of at least 1 mg/dl above baseline. Using the same criteria, we studied 214 patients undergoing various intravascular radiocontrast media procedures. Patients were infused with a specially prepared cocktail solution (NSMF) containing 1000 ml half-normal saline, 12.5 g of mannitol (M), I ampule NaHCO3, and 200 mg of furosemide (F) at 100 ml/h from one hour prior to two hours after the procedure. Urinary output was replaced with normal saline for at least 6 h after the procedure. Seven percent of the patients developed acute renal insufficiency. Only 3% of the patients had a rise in serum creatinine greater than 2 mg/dl. No patient required dialysis therapy after the procedure. There was one unrelated death caused by acute myocardial infarction postangioplasty. Risk factors for development of ARF despite cocktail administration included the presence of diabetes mellitus and angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor therapy. We concluded that the properly administered NSMF solution protects against radiocontrast dye induced renal failure. In select patients with chronic renal insufficiency, consideration should be given to withholding ACE inhibitor therapy for 24-48 h prior to administration of intravenous radiocontrast dye. A large controlled trial will be required to establish whether the NSMF solution offers benefit beyond that of saline hydration alone.

Does prophylactic treatment with felodipine, a calcium antagonist, prevent low-osmolar contrast-induced renal dysfunction in hydrated diabetic and nondiabetic patients with normal or moderately reduced renal function?

Twenty-seven patients (15 diabetics and 12 non-diabetics) with normal to moderately reduced renal function underwent femoral angiography with a low-osmolar contrast agent, iohexol (Omnipaque), under perexaminatory hydration. Fourteen patients were randomised to pretreatment with oral felodipine extended release (Plendil) 10 mg and 13 patients to placebo 3-4 h before angiography. GFR measured with [51Cr] EDTA-clearance decreased 24 hours after the angiography in the felodipine group from GFR 52.5 +/- 18.6 (mean +/- SD) to 46.2 +/- 16.5 ml/min (p < 0.01) and in the placebo group from 70.6 +/- 18.6 to 62.6 +/- 26.4 ml/min (p < 0.01). Serum creatinine increased significantly in the felodipine group from 128 +/- 61 to 139 +/- 67 mumol/l (p < 0.05) but not in the placebo group (122 +/- 54 to 125 +/- 51 mumol/l (ns)). The values of serum creatinine returned to baseline levels 7 days after angiography. During hydration there was only a slight reduction of GFR after angiography with iohexol. Thus, felodipine had no major effect on GFR after iohexol but, as baseline GFR tended to be lower in the felodipine pre-treated patients, it might have had some renoprotective effect in patients with more advanced renal failure.

Nephrotoxicity of ionic and nonionic contrast media in 1196 patients: a randomized trial. The Iohexol Cooperative Study

The incidence of nephrotoxicity occurring with the nonionic contrast agent, iohexol, and the ionic contrast agent, meglumine/sodium diatrizoate, was compared in 1196 patients undergoing cardiac angiography in a prospective, randomized, double-blind multicenter trial. Patients were stratified into four groups: renal insufficiency (RI), diabetes mellitus (DM) both absent (N = 364); RI absent, DM present (N = 318); RI present, DM absent (N = 298); and RI and DM both present (N = 216). Serum creatinine levels were measured at -18 to 24, 0, and 24, 48, and 72 hours following contrast administration. Prophylactic hydration was administered pre- and post-angiography. Acute nephrotoxicity (increase in serum creatinine of > or = 1 mg/dl 48 to 72 hours post-contrast) was observed in 42 (7%) patients receiving diatrizoate compared to 19 (3%) patients receiving iohexol, P < 0.002. Differences in nephrotoxicity between the two contrast groups were confined to patients with RI alone or combined with DM. In a multivariate analysis, baseline serum creatinine, male gender, DM, volume of contrast agent, and RI were independently related to the risk of nephrotoxicity. Patients with RI receiving diatrizoate were 3.3 times as likely to develop acute nephrotoxicity compared to those receiving iohexol. Clinically severe adverse renal events were uncommon (N = 15) and did not differ in incidence between contrast groups (iohexol N = 6; diatrizoate N = 9). In conclusion, in patients undergoing cardiac angiography, only those with pre-existing RI alone or combined with DM are at higher risk for acute contrast nephrotoxicity.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Nephrotoxic risks of renal angiography: contrast media-associated nephrotoxicity and atheroembolism--a critical review

Renal angiography remains the "gold standard" procedure for the detection of renal artery stenosis. However, clinicians often avoid renal angiography because of fears of contrast media-associated nephrotoxicity (CM-AN) and atheroembolism. This review focuses on these potential angiographic complications, with particular emphasis, in the case of CM-AN, on clinical features, incidence, risk factors with an emphasis on pre-existing renal insufficiency and diabetes mellitus, volume of contrast media, low osmolar versus high osmolar contrast media, and prophylaxis. For atheroembolism, areas emphasized are pathology, clinical features, precipitating features, and incidence in various settings. Although the literature contains an abundance of information about CM-AN and atheroembolism, this review identified multiple areas of uncertainty regarding features of both of these complications. For example, additional studies are needed to determine the incidence of CM-AN, both asymptomatic and clinically severe, in patients with a wide range of pre-existing renal insufficiency with and without diabetes mellitus, following low volume digital subtraction renal angiography with low osmolar contrast media. In a similar manner, studies are needed with adequate postcontrast observation periods to determine the true incidence of clinically significant atheroembolism following diagnostic renal angiography and angioplasty and techniques that may modify this complication. Until further knowledge in both of these areas is available, it is difficult to precisely determine the risks of renal angiography and/or angioplasty in the azotemic patient suspected of or having renal ischemic disease using modern radiologic techniques.

Contrast-induced nephrotoxicity in patients undergoing cardiac catheterization

Contrast-induced nephrotoxicity (CIN) is a common concern among angiographers. The causes of CIN are not well understood and the identification and preparation of patients at risk are important. This report reviews the literature concerning the causes and identification of patients at risk and documents the studies that are available to improve the safety of cardiac catheterization and cardiac interventions by reducing the risk of CIN.

Contrast nephropathy in patients with impaired renal function: high versus low osmolar media

Prescription of low osmolar contrast to prevent nephrotoxicity in subjects with pre-existing renal impairment is costly and has not been clearly shown to be effective. We entered 249 subjects with a pre-contrast serum creatinine greater than 120 mumol/liter (1.35 mg/dl) having cardiac catheterization or intravenous contrast into a randomized controlled trial comparing high and low osmolar contrast. The outcome assessed was a rise in serum creatinine repeated 48 to 72 hours after contrast. A further 117 patients entered the non-randomized prospective arm of the study. In the randomized study the serum creatinine rose by at least 25% after contrast in 8 of 117 (6.8%) given high and in 5 of 132 (3.8%) given low osmolar contrast (P greater than 0.05, one-tailed 95% confidence interval for the difference 3 to 7.8%). More severe renal failure (greater than 50% increase in serum creatinine) after contrast was uncommon (3.4% with high and 1.5% with low osmolar contrast). A rise in serum creatinine after contrast was significantly associated with the severity of the pre-contrast renal impairment and the presence of diabetes mellitus, but not with type of contrast. Diabetics with a serum creatinine greater than 200 mumol/liter (2.25 mg/dl) pre-contrast had a highest risk of deterioration in renal function after contrast. We conclude that in patients with pre-existing renal impairment the incidence of contrast nephropathy was not significantly different comparing high osmolar and nonionic contrast. The potential benefit of nonionic contrast in moderate renal impairment is likely to be small, but trials in diabetics with severe renal impairment should be undertaken urgently.