Assessing Immunotherapy with Functional and Molecular Imaging and Radiomics

Imaging genomics of cancer: a bibliometric analysis and review

BACKGROUND

Imaging genomics is a burgeoning field that seeks to connections between medical imaging and genomic features. It has been widely applied to explore heterogeneity and predict responsiveness and disease progression in cancer. This review aims to assess current applications and advancements of imaging genomics in cancer.

METHODS

Literature on imaging genomics in cancer was retrieved and selected from PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase before July 2024. Detail information of articles, such as systems and imaging features, were extracted and analyzed. Citation information was extracted from Web of Science and Scopus. Additionally, a bibliometric analysis of the included studies was conducted using the Bibliometrix R package and VOSviewer.

RESULTS

A total of 370 articles were included in the study. The annual growth rate of articles on imaging genomics in cancer is 24.88%. China (133) and the USA (107) were the most productive countries. The top 2 keywords plus were "survival" and "classification". The current research mainly focuses on the central nervous system (121) and the genitourinary system (110, including 44 breast cancer articles). Despite different systems utilizing different imaging modalities, more than half of the studies in each system employed radiomics features.

CONCLUSIONS

Publication databases provide data support for imaging genomics research. The development of artificial intelligence algorithms, especially in feature extraction and model construction, has significantly advanced this field. It is conducive to enhancing the related-models' interpretability. Nonetheless, challenges such as the sample size and the standardization of feature extraction and model construction must overcome. And the research trends revealed in this study will guide the development of imaging genomics in the future and contribute to more accurate cancer diagnosis and treatment in the clinic.

Interventional Oncology Meets Immuno-oncology: Combination Therapies for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

The management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is undergoing transformational changes due to the emergence of various novel immunotherapies and their combination with image-guided locoregional therapies. In this setting, immunotherapy is expected to become one of the standards of care in both neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings across all disease stages of HCC. Currently, more than 50 ongoing prospective clinical trials are investigating various end points for the combination of immunotherapy with both percutaneous and catheter-directed therapies. This review will outline essential tumor microenvironment mechanisms responsible for disease evolution and therapy resistance, discuss the rationale for combining locoregional therapy with immunotherapy, summarize ongoing clinical trials, and report on developing imaging end points and novel biomarkers that are relevant to both diagnostic and interventional radiologists participating in the management of HCC.

Ways of analysing extracellular gadolinium enhancement

The use of extracellular gadolinium-based contrast agents provides valuable information in magnetic resonance studies, thus increasing diagnostic confidence. These contrast agents make it easier to detect and define injuries, and narrow down the differential diagnosis. They are indicated for several different reasons, both for diagnostic purposes and for evaluating the response to treatment. Morphological analysis can assess the type of uptake, the qualitative and semiquantitative study of the signal intensity vs time curves in multiphase sequences, and the quantitative analysis of the uptake with T1 or T2* perfusion studies associated with pharmacokinetic models. Multiphase dynamic studies with 3D sequences contain valuable information that is not exploited by a simple visual analysis of 2D images. To take advantage of this information and the imaging biomarkers provided, computational analysis should be used. To this end, the future role of artificial intelligence is increasingly evident.

Cancer Immunotherapy and Medical Imaging Research Trends from 2003 to 2023: A Bibliometric Analysis

Purpose

With the rapid development of immunotherapy, cancer treatment has entered a new phase. Medical imaging, as a primary diagnostic method, is closely related to cancer immunotherapy. However, until now, there has been no systematic bibliometric analysis of the state of this field. Therefore, the main purpose of this article is to clarify the past research trajectory, summarize current research hotspots, reveal dynamic scientific developments, and explore future research directions.

Patients and Methods

A comprehensive search was conducted on the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) database to identify publications related to immunotherapy specifically for the medical imaging of carcinoma. The search spanned the period from the year 2003 to 2023. Several analytical tools were employed. These included CiteSpace (6.2.4), and the Microsoft Office Excel (2016).

Results

By searching the database, a total of 704 English articles published between 2003 and 2023 were obtained. We have observed a rapid increase in the number of publications since 2018. The two most active countries are the United States (n=265) and China (n=170). Pittock, Sean J and Abu-sbeih, Hamzah are very concerned about the relationship between cancer immunotherapy and medical images and have published more academic papers (n = 5; n = 4). Among the top 10 co-cited authors, Topalian Sl (n=43) cited ranked first, followed by Graus F (n=40) cited. According to clustering, timeline, and burst word analysis, the results show that the current research focus is on "MRI", "deep learning", "tumor microenvironment" and so on.

Conclusion

Medical imaging and cancer immunotherapy are hot topics. The United States is the country with the most publications and the greatest influence in this field, followed by China. "MRI", "PET/PET-CT", "deep learning", "immune-related adverse events" and "tumor microenvironment" are currently hot research topics and potential targets.

Translational considerations for immunotherapy clinical trials in pediatric neuro-oncology

While immunotherapy for pediatric cancer has made great strides in recent decades, including the FDA approval of agents such as dinutuximab and tisgenlecleucel, these successes have rarely impacted children with pediatric central nervous system (CNS) tumors. As our understanding of the biological underpinnings of these tumors evolves, new immunotherapeutics are undergoing rapid clinical translation specifically designed for children with CNS tumors. Most recently, there have been notable clinical successes with oncolytic viruses, vaccines, adoptive cellular therapy, and immune checkpoint inhibition. In this article, the immunotherapy working group of the Pacific Pediatric Neuro-Oncology Consortium (PNOC) reviews the current and future state of immunotherapeutic CNS clinical trials with a focus on clinical trial development. Based on recent therapeutic trials, we discuss unique immunotherapy clinical trial challenges, including toxicity considerations, disease assessment, and correlative studies. Combinatorial strategies and future directions will be addressed. Through internationally collaborative efforts and consortia, we aim to direct this promising field of immuno-oncology to the next frontier of successful application against pediatric CNS tumors.

Radiomic Models Predict Tumor Microenvironment Using Artificial Intelligence-the Novel Biomarkers in Breast Cancer Immune Microenvironment

Breast cancer is the most common malignancy in women, and some subtypes are associated with a poor prognosis with a lack of efficacious therapy. Moreover, immunotherapy and the use of other novel antibody‒drug conjugates have been rapidly incorporated into the standard management of advanced breast cancer. To extract more benefit from these therapies, clarifying and monitoring the tumor microenvironment (TME) status is critical, but this is difficult to accomplish based on conventional approaches. Radiomics is a method wherein radiological image features are comprehensively collected and assessed to build connections with disease diagnosis, prognosis, therapy efficacy, the TME, etc In recent years, studies focused on predicting the TME using radiomics have increasingly emerged, most of which demonstrate meaningful results and show better capability than conventional methods in some aspects. Beyond predicting tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, immunophenotypes, cytokines, infiltrating inflammatory factors, and other stromal components, radiomic models have the potential to provide a completely new approach to deciphering the TME and facilitating tumor management by physicians.

A pre-treatment CT-based weighted radiomic approach combined with clinical characteristics to predict durable clinical benefits of immunotherapy in advanced lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

To develop a pre-treatment CT-based predictive model to anticipate inoperable lung cancer patients' progression-free survival (PFS) to immunotherapy.

METHODS

This single-center retrospective study developed and cross-validated a radiomic model in 185 patients and tested it in 48 patients. The binary endpoint is the durable clinical benefit (DCB, PFS ≥ 6 months) and non-DCB (NDCB, PFS < 6 months). Radiomic features were extracted from multiple intrapulmonary lesions and weighted by an attention-based multiple-instance learning model. Aggregated features were then selected through L2-regularized ridge regression. Five machine-learning classifiers were conducted to build predictive models using radiomic and clinical features alone and then together. Lastly, the predictive value of the model with the best performance was validated by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis.

RESULTS

The predictive models based on the weighted radiomic approach showed superior performance across all classifiers (AUCs: 0.75-0.82) compared with the largest lesion approach (AUCs: 0.70-0.78) and the average sum approach (AUCs: 0.64-0.80). Among them, the logistic regression model yielded the most balanced performance (AUC = 0.87 [95%CI 0.84-0.89], 0.75 [0.68-0.82], 0.80 [0.68-0.92] in the training, validation, and test cohort respectively). The addition of five clinical characteristics significantly enhanced the performance of radiomic-only model (train: AUC 0.91 [0.89-0.93], p = .042; validation: AUC 0.86 [0.80-0.91], p = .011; test: AUC 0.86 [0.76-0.96], p = .026). Kaplan-Meier analysis of the radiomic-based predictive models showed a clear stratification between classifier-predicted DCB versus NDCB for PFS (HR = 2.40-2.95, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The adoption of weighted radiomic features from multiple intrapulmonary lesions has the potential to predict long-term PFS benefits for patients who are candidates for PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapies.

KEY POINTS

• Weighted radiomic-based model derived from multiple intrapulmonary lesions on pre-treatment CT images has the potential to predict durable clinical benefits of immunotherapy in lung cancer. • Early line immunotherapy is associated with longer progression-free survival in advanced lung cancer.

Evolution of Radiological Treatment Response Assessments for Cancer Immunotherapy: From iRECIST to Radiomics and Artificial Intelligence

Immunotherapy has revolutionized and opened a new paradigm for cancer treatment. In the era of immunotherapy and molecular targeted therapy, precision medicine has gained emphasis, and an early response assessment is a key element of this approach. Treatment response assessment for immunotherapy is challenging for radiologists because of the rapid development of immunotherapeutic agents, from immune checkpoint inhibitors to chimeric antigen receptor-T cells, with which many radiologists may not be familiar, and the atypical responses to therapy, such as pseudoprogression and hyperprogression. Therefore, new response assessment methods such as immune response assessment, functional/molecular imaging biomarkers, and artificial intelligence (including radiomics and machine learning approaches) have been developed and investigated. Radiologists should be aware of recent trends in immunotherapy development and new response assessment methods.

Diffusion-Weighted MRI for Predicting Pathologic Complete Response in Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy

This study tested the hypothesis that a change in the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measured in diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) is an independent imaging marker, and ADC performs better than functional tumor volume (FTV) for assessing treatment response in patients with locally advanced breast cancer receiving neoadjuvant immunotherapy. A total of 249 patients were randomized to standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy with pembrolizumab (pembro) or without pembrolizumab (control). DCE-MRI and DWI, performed prior to and 3 weeks after the start of treatment, were analyzed. Percent changes of tumor ADC metrics (mean, 5th to 95th percentiles of ADC histogram) and FTV were evaluated for the prediction of pathologic complete response (pCR) using a logistic regression model. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) estimated for the percent change in mean ADC was higher in the pembro cohort (0.73, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.52 to 0.93) than in the control cohort (0.63, 95% CI: 0.43 to 0.83). In the control cohort, the percent change of the 95th percentile ADC achieved the highest AUC, 0.69 (95% CI: 0.52 to 0.85). In the pembro cohort, the percent change of the 25th percentile ADC achieved the highest AUC, 0.75 (95% CI: 0.55 to 0.95). AUCs estimated for percent change of FTV were 0.61 (95% CI: 0.39 to 0.83) and 0.66 (95% CI: 0.47 to 0.85) for the pembro and control cohorts, respectively. Tumor ADC may perform better than FTV to predict pCR at an early treatment time-point during neoadjuvant immunotherapy.

Imaging of Cancer Immunotherapy: Response Assessment Methods, Atypical Response Patterns, and Immune-Related Adverse Events, From the AJR Special Series on Imaging of Inflammation

The introduction of immunotherapy with immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has revolutionized cancer treatment paradigms. Since FDA approval of the first ICI in 2011, multiple additional ICIs have been approved and granted marketing authorization, and many promising agents are in early clinical adoption. Due to the distinctive biologic mechanisms of ICIs, the patterns of tumor response and progression seen with immunotherapy differ from those observed with cytotoxic chemothera-pies. With increasing clinical adoption of immunotherapy, it is critical for radiologists to recognize different response patterns and common pitfalls to avoid misinterpretation of imaging studies or prompt premature cessation of potentially effective treatment. This review provides an overview of ICIs and their mechanisms of action and discusses anatomic and metabolic immune-related response assessment methods, typical and atypical patterns of immunotherapy response (including pseudoprogression, hyperprogression, dissociated response, and durable response), and common imaging features of immune-related adverse events. Future multicenter trials are needed to validate the proposed immune-related response criteria and identify the functional imaging markers of early treatment response and survival.

Challenges in ensuring the generalizability of image quantitation methods for MRI

Image quantitation methods including quantitative MRI, multiparametric MRI, and radiomics offer great promise for clinical use. However, many of these methods have limited clinical adoption, in part due to issues of generalizability, that is, the ability to translate methods and models across institutions. Researchers can assess generalizability through measurement of repeatability and reproducibility, thus quantifying different aspects of measurement variance. In this article, we review the challenges to ensuring repeatability and reproducibility of image quantitation methods as well as present strategies to minimize their variance to enable wider clinical implementation. We present possible solutions for achieving clinically acceptable performance of image quantitation methods and briefly discuss the impact of minimizing variance and achieving generalizability towards clinical implementation and adoption.

Technological advances in cancer immunity: from immunogenomics to single-cell analysis and artificial intelligence

Immunotherapies play critical roles in cancer treatment. However, given that only a few patients respond to immune checkpoint blockades and other immunotherapeutic strategies, more novel technologies are needed to decipher the complicated interplay between tumor cells and the components of the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME). Tumor immunomics refers to the integrated study of the TIME using immunogenomics, immunoproteomics, immune-bioinformatics, and other multi-omics data reflecting the immune states of tumors, which has relied on the rapid development of next-generation sequencing. High-throughput genomic and transcriptomic data may be utilized for calculating the abundance of immune cells and predicting tumor antigens, referring to immunogenomics. However, as bulk sequencing represents the average characteristics of a heterogeneous cell population, it fails to distinguish distinct cell subtypes. Single-cell-based technologies enable better dissection of the TIME through precise immune cell subpopulation and spatial architecture investigations. In addition, radiomics and digital pathology-based deep learning models largely contribute to research on cancer immunity. These artificial intelligence technologies have performed well in predicting response to immunotherapy, with profound significance in cancer therapy. In this review, we briefly summarize conventional and state-of-the-art technologies in the field of immunogenomics, single-cell and artificial intelligence, and present prospects for future research.

Response Prediction and Evaluation Using PET in Patients with Solid Tumors Treated with Immunotherapy

Simple Summary

In cancer treatment, immunotherapy is increasingly becoming important as a component of first-line treatment and has improved the prognosis of patients since its introduction. A large group of patients, however, do not respond to immunotherapy, and predicting a treatment response remains challenging. Furthermore, evaluating a response using conventional computed tomography (CT) scans is not straightforward due to the different mechanism of action of immunotherapy compared to chemotherapy. This review provides an overview of positron emission tomography (PET) in predicting and evaluating treatment response to immunotherapy.

Abstract

In multiple malignancies, checkpoint inhibitor therapy has an established role in the first-line treatment setting. However, only a subset of patients benefit from checkpoint inhibition, and as a result, the field of biomarker research is active. Molecular imaging with the use of positron emission tomography (PET) is one of the biomarkers that is being studied. PET tracers such as conventional ¹⁸F-FDG but also PD-(L)1 directed tracers are being evaluated for their predictive power. Furthermore, the use of artificial intelligence is under evaluation for the purpose of response prediction. Response evaluation during checkpoint inhibitor therapy can be challenging due to the different response patterns that can be observed compared to traditional chemotherapy. The additional information provided by PET can potentially be of value to evaluate a response early after the start of treatment and provide the clinician with important information about the efficacy of immunotherapy. Furthermore, the use of PET to stratify between patients with a complete response and those with a residual disease can potentially guide clinicians to identify patients for which immunotherapy can be discontinued and patients for whom the treatment needs to be escalated. This review provides an overview of the use of positron emission tomography (PET) to predict and evaluate treatment response to immunotherapy.

Challenges and advances for the treatment of renal cancer patients with brain metastases: From immunological background to upcoming clinical evidence on immune-checkpoint inhibitors

The introduction of checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) treatment landscape, resulted in improvements in overall survival (OS) in metastatic patients. Brain metastases (BMs) are a specific metastatic site of interest representing a predictive factor of poor prognosis. Patients with BMs were usually excluded from prospective clinical trials in the past. Despite recent evidence suggest the efficacy and safety of ICIs, the BMs treatment remains a challenge; the immunotherapy responsiveness seems to be multifactorial and dependent on several factors, such as the genetic intratumor heterogeneity and the immunosuppressive role of the brain tumor microenvironment. This review, starting from the immunological background in RCC BMs, provide an overview of the upcoming evidence from clinical trials, address the issues related to the neuroradiological immunotherapy response evaluation and, with a look to the future, describes how the epigenetic modulation of immune evasion could represent a background for new therapeutic strategies.

Pre-Immunotherapy Contrast-Enhanced CT Texture-Based Classification: A Useful Approach to Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Immunotherapy Efficacy Prediction

Objective: To investigate the utility of the pre-immunotherapy contrast-enhanced CT-based texture classification in predicting response to non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) immunotherapy treatment.

Methods: Sixty-three patients with 72 lesions who received immunotherapy were enrolled in this study. We extracted textures including histogram, absolute gradient, run-length matrix, gray-level co-occurrence matrix, autoregressive model, and wavelet transform from pre-immunotherapy contrast-enhanced CT by using Mazda software. Three different methods, namely, Fisher coefficient, mutual information measure (MI), and minimization of classification error probability combined average correlation coefficients (POE + ACC), were performed to select 10 optimal texture feature sets, respectively. The patients were divided into non-progressive disease (non-PD) and progressive disease (PD) groups. t-test or Mann–Whitney U-test was performed to test the differences in each texture feature set between the above two groups. Each texture feature set was analyzed by principal component analysis (PCA), linear discriminant analysis (LDA), and non-linear discriminant analysis (NDA). The area under the curve (AUC) was used to quantify the predictive accuracy of the above three analysis models for each texture feature set, and the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were also calculated, respectively.

Results: Among the three texture feature sets, the texture parameter differences of kurtosis (2.12 ± 3.92 vs. 0.78 ± 1.10, p = 0.047), “S(2,2)SumEntrp” (1.14 ± 0.31 vs. 1.24 ± 0.12, p = 0.036), and “S(1,0)SumEntrp” (1.18 ± 0.27 vs. 1.28 ± 0.11, p = 0.046) between the non-PD and PD group were statistically significant (all p < 0.05). The classification result of texture feature set selected by POE + ACC and analyzed by NDA was identified as the best model (AUC = 0.812, 95% CI: 0.706–0.919) with a sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV, and NPV of 88.2, 76.3, 81.9, 76.9, and 87.9%, respectively.

Conclusion: Pre-immunotherapy contrast-enhanced CT-based texture provides a new method for clinical evaluation of the NSCLC immunotherapy efficacy prediction.