1
|
Basha MAA, Almalki YE. Editorial for "T1-Hyperintense Cystic Renal Masses: MR Subtraction Imaging May Improve Interobserver Agreement and Diagnostic Performance in the Bosniak Classification". J Magn Reson Imaging 2025. [PMID: 40376817 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.29823] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2025] [Accepted: 04/24/2025] [Indexed: 05/18/2025] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | - Yassir Edrees Almalki
- Division of Radiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical College, Najran University, Najran, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
- Medical Imaging Department, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kang H, Guo H, Ning X, Xu W, Liu H, Liu Z, Ding X, Bai X, Li C, Wen X, Yi S, Cui M, Zhao J, Li L, Zhang X, Huang Q, Ye H, Ma X, Wang H. T1-Hyperintense Cystic Renal Masses: MR Subtraction Imaging May Improve Interobserver Agreement and Diagnostic Performance in the Bosniak Classification. J Magn Reson Imaging 2025. [PMID: 40372121 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.29822] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2025] [Revised: 05/04/2025] [Accepted: 05/05/2025] [Indexed: 05/16/2025] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND T1-hyperintensity in cystic renal masses (CRMs) complicates Bosniak classification assessment due to inherent signal interference from hemorrhage and proteinaceous content, potentially obscuring enhancement visibility. PURPOSE To investigate whether MR subtraction imaging improves interobserver agreement and diagnostic performance in the Bosniak classification of T1-hyperintense CRMs. STUDY TYPE Retrospective. POPULATION A total of 139 consecutive patients (mean age, 50 ± 12 years; 97 males) with 141 T1-hyperintense CRMs were included, consisting of surgically confirmed 133 lesions and clinically diagnosed 8 benign CRMs that were stable during follow-up (≥ 5 years). FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE 1.5/3 T. fat-saturated T2-weighted imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging, unenhanced, and triphasic dynamic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging (T1WI). Subtraction images were generated automatically by subtracting unenhanced from triphasic contrast-enhanced T1WI. ASSESSMENT Six radiologists (half less experienced) independently classified all T1-hyperintense CRMs using the Bosniak classification (v2019) in two sessions, with and without subtraction imaging. A 1-month washout period was implemented between sessions, and the order of cases was re-randomized. Interobserver agreement and diagnostic performance were evaluated in all experienced and less experienced readers. STATISTICAL TESTS Weighted κ statistics assessed interobserver agreement. Diagnostic performance (the area under the curve [AUC], sensitivity, specificity) was compared using Delong and McNemar tests. Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05. RESULTS Subtraction imaging significantly improved interobserver agreement in all radiologists (weighted κ = 0.62 vs. 0.46), and less experienced radiologists (3-5 years of experience, weighted κ = 0.63 vs. 0.42), though not significantly among experienced radiologists (10-15 years of experience, weighted κ = 0.61 vs. 0.52; p = 0.051). Less experienced radiologists showed significantly higher AUC (0.865 vs. 0.804), sensitivity (88.9% vs. 75.5%), and specificity (88.2% vs. 72.5%) with MR subtraction imaging. DATA CONCLUSION MR subtraction imaging may improve overall interobserver agreement in the Bosniak classification of T1-hyperintense CRMs. Furthermore, it could improve diagnostic accuracy and interobserver agreement among less experienced radiologists. EVIDENCE LEVEL 4. TECHNICAL EFFICACY Stage 2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huanhuan Kang
- Department of Radiology, First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
- Chinese PLA Medical School, Beijing, China
| | - Huiping Guo
- Department of Radiology, First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Xueyi Ning
- Department of Radiology, First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Wei Xu
- Department of Radiology, First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Haili Liu
- Department of Radiology, Fourth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Zhe Liu
- Department of Radiology, Daqing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Daqing, China
| | - Xiaohui Ding
- Department of Pathology, First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Xu Bai
- Department of Radiology, First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Chaobo Li
- Department of Radiology, First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Xuewei Wen
- Department of Radiology, First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Sicheng Yi
- Department of Radiology, First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Mengqiu Cui
- Department of Radiology, First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Jian Zhao
- Department of Radiology, Second Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Lin Li
- Department of Innovative Medical Research, Hospital Management Institute, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaojing Zhang
- Department of Radiology, First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Qingbo Huang
- Department of Urology, Third Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Huiyi Ye
- Department of Radiology, First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Xin Ma
- Department of Urology, Third Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Haiyi Wang
- Department of Radiology, First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
van der Pol CB. Editorial Comment: What Matters Most for Cystic Renal Masses? AJR Am J Roentgenol 2025; 224:e2432619. [PMID: 39813609 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.24.32619] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2025]
Affiliation(s)
- Christian B van der Pol
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre, Hamilton Health Sciences, 711 Concession St, Hamilton, ON L8V 1C3, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mirón Mombiela R, Balschmidt T, Birch C, Lyngby CG, Bretlau T. Diagnostic performance of contrast enhancement to differentiate benign and malignant renal lesions in CT and MRI: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) studies. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2025; 50:360-378. [PMID: 39136719 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-024-04514-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2024] [Revised: 07/26/2024] [Accepted: 07/30/2024] [Indexed: 01/11/2025]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of contrast enhancement to differentiate benign and malignant renal lesions using CT and MRI. MATERIAL AND METHODS A systematic literature search of databases was performed between January 1, 1980 and September 26, 2022. We included studies reporting the accuracy of CE thresholds on CT and MRI indeterminate renal lesions, with pathologic examination and follow-up as the reference standard. Studies meeting the inclusion criteria underwent quality assessment with the Cochrane recommendation for diagnostic accuracy study Quality Assessment 2. We excluded studies with high risk of bias. Summary estimates of diagnostic performance were obtained with the bivariate Bayesian model for CT and MRI. Effects of different thresholds and index test modalities were investigated through subgroup analysis. RESULTS Eleven studies (1372 patients) using CT and six studies (218 patients) using MRI were included. Of the eleven studies, 15 parts from 9 studies were considered for the CT meta-analysis, and 6 parts from 3 studies for the MRI meta-analysis. Diagnostic performance meta-analysis on enhancement found a 96% summary sensitivity (95% CI 92, 98) and a 92% summary specificity (95% CI 85, 96) in 2056 renal lesions for CT; and 82% summary sensitivity (95% CI 65, 89) and an 89% summary specificity (95% CI 77, 95) in 634 lesions for MRI. CONCLUSION CT and MRI have high accuracy to determine enhancement and classify renal lesions, and both modalities can be used with confidence for this purpose. There are still some controversies about the optimal thresholds. Future research should evaluate outcomes and decision-making pathways to determine whether basing clinical decisions on a specific threshold on CT and MRI would do more harm than good.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebeca Mirón Mombiela
- Department of Radiology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 1, 2730, Herlev, Denmark.
| | - Trine Balschmidt
- Department of Radiology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 1, 2730, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Carsten Birch
- Department of Radiology, Zealand University Hospital, Lykkebækvej 1, 4600, Køge, Denmark
| | | | - Thomas Bretlau
- Department of Radiology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 1, 2730, Herlev, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Becker J, Feitelson LM, Risch F, Canalini L, Kaufmann D, Wudy R, Jehs B, Haerting M, Wollny C, Scheurig-Muenkler C, Kroencke T, Schwarz F, Decker JA, Bette S. Spectral Differentiation of Hyperdense Non-Vascular and Vascular Renal Lesions Without Solid Components in Contrast-Enhanced Photon-Counting Detector CT Scans-A Pilot Study. Diagnostics (Basel) 2025; 15:79. [PMID: 39795607 PMCID: PMC11719968 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics15010079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2024] [Revised: 12/18/2024] [Accepted: 12/27/2024] [Indexed: 01/13/2025] Open
Abstract
Introduction: The number of incidental renal lesions identified in CT scans of the abdomen is increasing. Objective: The aim of this study was to determine whether hyperdense renal lesions without solid components in a portal venous CT scan can be clearly classified as vascular or non-vascular by material decomposition into iodine and water. Methods: This retrospective single-center study included 26 patients (mean age 72 years ± 9; 16 male) with 42 hyperdense renal lesions (>20 HU) in a contrast-enhanced Photon-Counting Detector CT scan (PCD-CT) between May and December 2022. Spectral decomposition into virtual non-contrast (VNC) images and iodine quantification maps was performed, and HU values were quantified within the lesions. Further imaging and histopathological reports served as reference standards. Results: Mean VNC values were 55.7 (±24.2) HU for non-vascular and 32.2 (±11.1) HU for vascular renal lesions. Mean values in the iodine maps were 5.7 (±7.8) HU for non-vascular and 33.3 (±19.0) HU for vascular renal lesions. Using a threshold of >20.3 HU in iodine maps, a total of 7/8 (87.5%) vascular lesions were correctly identified. Conclusion: This proof-of-principle study suggests that the routine use of spectral information acquired in PCD-CT scans might be able to reduce the necessary workup for hyperdense renal lesions without solid components. Further studies with larger patient cohorts are necessary to validate the results of this study and to determine the usefulness of this method in clinical routine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Judith Becker
- Clinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Augsburg, Stenglinstr. 2, 86156 Augsburg, Germany; (J.B.); (L.-M.F.); (F.R.); (L.C.); (D.K.); (R.W.); (B.J.); (M.H.); (C.W.); (C.S.-M.); (J.A.D.); (S.B.)
| | - Laura-Marie Feitelson
- Clinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Augsburg, Stenglinstr. 2, 86156 Augsburg, Germany; (J.B.); (L.-M.F.); (F.R.); (L.C.); (D.K.); (R.W.); (B.J.); (M.H.); (C.W.); (C.S.-M.); (J.A.D.); (S.B.)
| | - Franka Risch
- Clinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Augsburg, Stenglinstr. 2, 86156 Augsburg, Germany; (J.B.); (L.-M.F.); (F.R.); (L.C.); (D.K.); (R.W.); (B.J.); (M.H.); (C.W.); (C.S.-M.); (J.A.D.); (S.B.)
| | - Luca Canalini
- Clinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Augsburg, Stenglinstr. 2, 86156 Augsburg, Germany; (J.B.); (L.-M.F.); (F.R.); (L.C.); (D.K.); (R.W.); (B.J.); (M.H.); (C.W.); (C.S.-M.); (J.A.D.); (S.B.)
| | - David Kaufmann
- Clinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Augsburg, Stenglinstr. 2, 86156 Augsburg, Germany; (J.B.); (L.-M.F.); (F.R.); (L.C.); (D.K.); (R.W.); (B.J.); (M.H.); (C.W.); (C.S.-M.); (J.A.D.); (S.B.)
| | - Ramona Wudy
- Clinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Augsburg, Stenglinstr. 2, 86156 Augsburg, Germany; (J.B.); (L.-M.F.); (F.R.); (L.C.); (D.K.); (R.W.); (B.J.); (M.H.); (C.W.); (C.S.-M.); (J.A.D.); (S.B.)
| | - Bertram Jehs
- Clinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Augsburg, Stenglinstr. 2, 86156 Augsburg, Germany; (J.B.); (L.-M.F.); (F.R.); (L.C.); (D.K.); (R.W.); (B.J.); (M.H.); (C.W.); (C.S.-M.); (J.A.D.); (S.B.)
| | - Mark Haerting
- Clinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Augsburg, Stenglinstr. 2, 86156 Augsburg, Germany; (J.B.); (L.-M.F.); (F.R.); (L.C.); (D.K.); (R.W.); (B.J.); (M.H.); (C.W.); (C.S.-M.); (J.A.D.); (S.B.)
| | - Claudia Wollny
- Clinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Augsburg, Stenglinstr. 2, 86156 Augsburg, Germany; (J.B.); (L.-M.F.); (F.R.); (L.C.); (D.K.); (R.W.); (B.J.); (M.H.); (C.W.); (C.S.-M.); (J.A.D.); (S.B.)
| | - Christian Scheurig-Muenkler
- Clinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Augsburg, Stenglinstr. 2, 86156 Augsburg, Germany; (J.B.); (L.-M.F.); (F.R.); (L.C.); (D.K.); (R.W.); (B.J.); (M.H.); (C.W.); (C.S.-M.); (J.A.D.); (S.B.)
| | - Thomas Kroencke
- Clinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Augsburg, Stenglinstr. 2, 86156 Augsburg, Germany; (J.B.); (L.-M.F.); (F.R.); (L.C.); (D.K.); (R.W.); (B.J.); (M.H.); (C.W.); (C.S.-M.); (J.A.D.); (S.B.)
- Centre for Advanced Analytics and Predictive Sciences (CAAPS), University of Augsburg, Universitätsstr. 2, 86159 Augsburg, Germany
| | - Florian Schwarz
- Centre for Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Therapy, Donau-Isar-Klinikum, Perlasberger Straße 41, 94469 Deggendorf, Germany;
| | - Josua A. Decker
- Clinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Augsburg, Stenglinstr. 2, 86156 Augsburg, Germany; (J.B.); (L.-M.F.); (F.R.); (L.C.); (D.K.); (R.W.); (B.J.); (M.H.); (C.W.); (C.S.-M.); (J.A.D.); (S.B.)
| | - Stefanie Bette
- Clinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Augsburg, Stenglinstr. 2, 86156 Augsburg, Germany; (J.B.); (L.-M.F.); (F.R.); (L.C.); (D.K.); (R.W.); (B.J.); (M.H.); (C.W.); (C.S.-M.); (J.A.D.); (S.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
He HB, Jin XC, Liu YC, Chen YX, Vaishnani DK, Xia YS, Xie ZL, Wang XQ, Lan L, Zhou M. Clinical value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound combined with quantitative analysis in Bosniak ≥ II cystic renal masses. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2024:10.1007/s00261-024-04744-4. [PMID: 39694945 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-024-04744-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2024] [Revised: 12/01/2024] [Accepted: 12/03/2024] [Indexed: 12/20/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The 2019 Bosniak classification has improved the precise and detailed quantitative evaluation criteria, making the diagnosis of cystic renal masses (CRMs) more accurate and objective. This study addresses the clinical value of quantitative analysis and aims to investigate the feasibility of combining contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) with quantitative analysis for diagnosing Bosniak ≥ II CRMs. METHODS We retrospectively obtained 58 CRMs with confirmed pathology, which underwent CEUS and Contrast-enhanced computer tomography (CECT) evaluations according to Bosniak classification between January 2013 and August 2024. These lesions were divided into benign and malignant groups, followed by a quantitative analysis of the morphological details detected by CEUS. All morphological parameters were compared, and the diagnostic efficiencies were evaluated using receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves, logistic regression (LR) analysis, and diagnostic curve analysis (DCA). Additionally, a cohort of 72 lesions was monitored for a period of ≥ 3 years, and changes in Bosniak classification were analyzed by categorizing them into stable, upgraded, and downgraded categories. RESULTS The analysis revealed no statistically significant difference between CEUS and CECT in our cohort's malignancy predictive rates across different Bosniak grades (p = 0.640). All morphological quantitative parameters showed statistically significant differences between the two groups (p < 0.001). ROC curve analysis revealed that the sum of enhanced wall thickness and enhanced septum thickness among quantitative parameters had the highest AUC value (AUC: 0.9226). Both LR models demonstrated superior clinical diagnostic performance with similar level of accuracy between qualitative and quantitative analysis, as evidenced by ROC (AUC: 0.9470, 0.9619, respectively) and DCA analyses. None of the lesions in the follow-up cohort were upgraded, suggesting that CRMs are relatively stable tumors with a low malignant potential. CONCLUSION This retrospective study demonstrated that CEUS combined with Bosniak classification and quantitative analysis could enhance diagnostic confidence in differentiating Bosniak ≥ II CRMs and could serve as a viable alternative to CECT in specific cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hua-Bin He
- Department of Hand and Foot Surgery, Yiwu Central Hospital, Yiwu, China
| | - Xuan-Chen Jin
- Department of Radiology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China
- The First Clinical School of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| | - Yun-Cai Liu
- Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| | - Yu-Xuan Chen
- The First Clinical School of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| | - Deep K Vaishnani
- School of International Studies, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| | - Yong-Sheng Xia
- Department of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| | - Zuo-Liu Xie
- Department of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| | - Xiao-Qiao Wang
- Wenzhou Medical University Renji College, Wenzhou, China
| | - Li Lan
- Department of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| | - Man Zhou
- Department of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Masino F, Eusebi L, Bertolotto M, Pizzileo SM, Pizzolorusso F, Sortino G, Pitoni L, Santarelli S, Galosi AB, Guglielmi G. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound in renal cystic lesions: an update. J Med Ultrason (2001) 2024; 51:635-647. [PMID: 39164480 PMCID: PMC11499418 DOI: 10.1007/s10396-024-01489-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2024] [Accepted: 07/18/2024] [Indexed: 08/22/2024]
Abstract
This narrative review aims to describe the current status of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in characterizing renal cystic lesion. The imaging techniques usually performed for their evaluation are ultrasonography (US), computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with different criteria of application based on the individual case and the purpose of the examination. Generally, US, as a non-ionizing examination, is the first imaging modality performed and therefore the one that incidentally detects cystic lesions. CT is the most performed imaging modality for cystic lesion assessment before MRI evaluation. It provides better characterization and management and has been introduced into the Bosniak classification. In this context, CEUS is making its way for its characteristics and represents the emerging technique in this field. With these premises, the authors analyze the role of CEUS in the evaluation of renal cysts, starting with an explanation of the technique, describe its main advantages and limitations, and end with a discussion of its application in the Bosniak classification and management, following the current major guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Federica Masino
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Foggia University School of Medicine, Viale L. Pinto 1, 71121, Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | - Laura Eusebi
- Radiology Unit, "Carlo Urbani" Hospital, Via Aldo Moro 52, 60035, Jesi, Ancona, Italy
| | - Michele Bertolotto
- Radiology Unit, "Cattinara" Hospital, Trieste University, Strada di Fiume 447, 34149, Trieste, Triestino, Italy
| | - Sara Maria Pizzileo
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Foggia University School of Medicine, Viale L. Pinto 1, 71121, Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | - Francesco Pizzolorusso
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Foggia University School of Medicine, Viale L. Pinto 1, 71121, Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Sortino
- Urology Unit, "Carlo Urbani" Hospital, Via Aldo Moro 52, 60035, Jesi, Ancona, Italy
| | - Lucia Pitoni
- Urology Unit, "Carlo Urbani" Hospital, Via Aldo Moro 52, 60035, Jesi, Ancona, Italy
| | - Stefano Santarelli
- Nephrology Unit, "Carlo Urbani" Hospital, Via Aldo Moro 52, 60035, Jesi, Ancona, Italy
| | - Andrea Benedetto Galosi
- Urology Unit, "Riuniti Torrette" Hospital di Ancona, Via Conca 71, 60126, Torrette, Ancona, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Guglielmi
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Foggia University School of Medicine, Viale L. Pinto 1, 71121, Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
- Radiology Unit, "Dimiccoli" Hospital, Viale Ippocrate 15, 70051, Barletta, Barletta-Andria-Trani, Italy.
- Radiology Unit, IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza" Hospital, Viale Cappuccini 1, 71013, San Giovanni Rotondo, Foggia, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Xiao SY, Xu JX, Shao YH, Yu RS. To identify important MRI features to differentiate hepatic mucinous cystic neoplasms from septated hepatic cysts based on random forest. Jpn J Radiol 2024; 42:880-891. [PMID: 38664363 DOI: 10.1007/s11604-024-01562-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2024] [Accepted: 03/17/2024] [Indexed: 07/30/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify important MRI features to differentiate hepatic mucinous cystic neoplasms (MCN) from septated hepatic cysts (HC) using random forest and compared with logistic regression algorithm. METHODS Pathologically diagnosed hepatic cysts and hepatic MCNs with pre-operative contrast-enhanced MRI in our hospital from 2010 to 2023 were collected and only septated lesions on enhanced MRI were enrolled. A total of 21 septated HC and 18 MCNs were included in this study. Eighteen MRI features were analyzed and top important features were identified based on random forest (RF) algorithm. The results were evaluated by the prediction performance of a RF model combining the important features and compared with the performance of the logistic regression (LR) algorithm. Finally, for each identified feature, diagnostic probability, sensitivity, and specificity were calculated and compared. RESULTS Four variables, i.e., the septation arising from wall without indentation, multiseptate, intracapsular cyst sign, and solitary lesion were extracted as top important features with significance for MCNs by the random forest algorithm. The RF model using these variables had an AUC of 0.982 (0.95CI, 0.950-1.000), compared with the LR model based on two identified features with AUC of 0.931 (0.95CI, 0.846-1.000), p = 0.202. Among the four important features, multiseptate had the highest specificity (95.2%) and good sensitivity (72.2%, lower than the septation from wall without indentation, 94.4%) to diagnose MCNs. CONCLUSION Four out of 18 MRI features were extracted as reliably important factors to differ hepatic MCNs from septated HC. The combination of these four features in a RF model could achieve satisfactory diagnostic efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Si-Yu Xiao
- Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Jian-Xia Xu
- Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yi-Huan Shao
- Department of Pathology, Zhejiang University School of Medicine Second Affiliated Hospital Linping Hospital, Hangzhou, China
| | - Ri-Sheng Yu
- Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Mendez T, Bahmad HF, Polit F, Carpio N, Gill A, Burke WF, Bhandari A, Poppiti R, Omarzai Y. Localized cystic kidney disease: a case report unveiling clinical and histopathological challenges. Autops Case Rep 2024; 14:e2024498. [PMID: 39021471 PMCID: PMC11253900 DOI: 10.4322/acr.2024.498] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2023] [Accepted: 04/26/2024] [Indexed: 07/20/2024]
Abstract
Localized cystic kidney disease (LCKD) is a distinct renal disorder characterized by the presence of cysts within specific regions of the kidneys. We present a rare case of a 41-year-old African American man, who presented to our medical center with lower urinary tract symptoms and gross hematuria. The initial assessment culminated in the identification of an uncomplicated urinary tract infection, prompting the prescription of appropriate oral antibiotic therapy. On follow-up after 5 months, the patient presented with gross hematuria. Imaging studies revealed a mixed-density cystic lesion of 2.6 cm situated within the interpolar region of the right kidney. This cystic lesion exhibited intricate septations at the superior pole of the kidney. Robotic-assisted right partial nephrectomy was performed, and pathologic examination was diagnostic for LCKD. This report not only underscores the uniqueness of LCKD but also presents a comprehensive review of the existing literature that pertains to this condition. Particular emphasis is placed upon its inherent benign behavior and its marked divergence from the progressive trajectory commonly associated with other renal diseases. We also explored the incidental findings of the disease, its diverse clinical symptomatology, conceivable etiological underpinnings, and the array of diagnostic modalities used. Finally, similarities in histopathologic findings with polycystic kidney disease and other entities are discussed, underscoring the importance of accurate diagnosis and management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Teresita Mendez
- Florida International University, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Hisham F. Bahmad
- Mount Sinai Medical Center, Arkadi M. Rywlin M.D. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Miami Beach, FL, USA
| | - Francesca Polit
- Mount Sinai Medical Center, Arkadi M. Rywlin M.D. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Miami Beach, FL, USA
| | - Nicole Carpio
- Columbia University, Mount Sinai Medical Center, Division of Urology, Miami Beach, FL, USA
| | - Arman Gill
- Mount Sinai Medical Center, Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Miami Beach, FL, USA
| | - William F. Burke
- Mount Sinai Medical Center, Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Miami Beach, FL, USA
| | - Akshay Bhandari
- Columbia University, Mount Sinai Medical Center, Division of Urology, Miami Beach, FL, USA
| | - Robert Poppiti
- Mount Sinai Medical Center, Arkadi M. Rywlin M.D. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Miami Beach, FL, USA
- Florida International University, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Department of Pathology, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Yumna Omarzai
- Mount Sinai Medical Center, Arkadi M. Rywlin M.D. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Miami Beach, FL, USA
- Florida International University, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Department of Pathology, Miami, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Dai C, Xiong Y, Zhu P, Yao L, Lin J, Yao J, Zhang X, Huang R, Wang R, Hou J, Wang K, Shi Z, Chen F, Guo J, Zeng M, Zhou J, Wang S. Deep Learning Assessment of Small Renal Masses at Contrast-enhanced Multiphase CT. Radiology 2024; 311:e232178. [PMID: 38742970 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.232178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/16/2024]
Abstract
Background Accurate characterization of suspicious small renal masses is crucial for optimized management. Deep learning (DL) algorithms may assist with this effort. Purpose To develop and validate a DL algorithm for identifying benign small renal masses at contrast-enhanced multiphase CT. Materials and Methods Surgically resected renal masses measuring 3 cm or less in diameter at contrast-enhanced CT were included. The DL algorithm was developed by using retrospective data from one hospital between 2009 and 2021, with patients randomly allocated in a training and internal test set ratio of 8:2. Between 2013 and 2021, external testing was performed on data from five independent hospitals. A prospective test set was obtained between 2021 and 2022 from one hospital. Algorithm performance was evaluated by using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and compared with the results of seven clinicians using the DeLong test. Results A total of 1703 patients (mean age, 56 years ± 12 [SD]; 619 female) with a single renal mass per patient were evaluated. The retrospective data set included 1063 lesions (874 in training set, 189 internal test set); the multicenter external test set included 537 lesions (12.3%, 66 benign) with 89 subcentimeter (≤1 cm) lesions (16.6%); and the prospective test set included 103 lesions (13.6%, 14 benign) with 20 (19.4%) subcentimeter lesions. The DL algorithm performance was comparable with that of urological radiologists: for the external test set, AUC was 0.80 (95% CI: 0.75, 0.85) versus 0.84 (95% CI: 0.78, 0.88) (P = .61); for the prospective test set, AUC was 0.87 (95% CI: 0.79, 0.93) versus 0.92 (95% CI: 0.86, 0.96) (P = .70). For subcentimeter lesions in the external test set, the algorithm and urological radiologists had similar AUC of 0.74 (95% CI: 0.63, 0.83) and 0.81 (95% CI: 0.68, 0.92) (P = .78), respectively. Conclusion The multiphase CT-based DL algorithm showed comparable performance with that of radiologists for identifying benign small renal masses, including lesions of 1 cm or less. Published under a CC BY 4.0 license. Supplemental material is available for this article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chenchen Dai
- From the Departments of Radiology (C.D., P.Z., Z.S., M.Z., J.Z.), Urology (Y.X., J.G.), and Pathology (J.H.), Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, Shanghai, China (C.D., P.Z., Z.S., M.Z.); Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China (L.Y., F.C.); Departments of Urology (J.L.) and Radiology (J.Z.), Xiamen Branch, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 668 Jinhu Road, Huli District, Xiamen 361015, China; Department of Urology, Zhangye People's Hospital affiliated to Hexi University, Zhangye, China (J.Y.); Department of Radiology, the First People's Hospital of Lianyungang, Lianyungang, China (X.Z.); Department of Radiology, Quanzhou First Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China (R.H.); Department of Pathology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Hangzhou, China (R.W.); Digital Medical Research Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China (K.W., S.W.); Shanghai Key Laboratory of MICCAI, Shanghai, China (K.W., S.W.); Xiamen Municipal Clinical Research Center for Medical Imaging, Xiamen, China (J.Z.); and Xiamen Key Clinical Specialty, Xiamen, China (J.Z.)
| | - Ying Xiong
- From the Departments of Radiology (C.D., P.Z., Z.S., M.Z., J.Z.), Urology (Y.X., J.G.), and Pathology (J.H.), Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, Shanghai, China (C.D., P.Z., Z.S., M.Z.); Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China (L.Y., F.C.); Departments of Urology (J.L.) and Radiology (J.Z.), Xiamen Branch, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 668 Jinhu Road, Huli District, Xiamen 361015, China; Department of Urology, Zhangye People's Hospital affiliated to Hexi University, Zhangye, China (J.Y.); Department of Radiology, the First People's Hospital of Lianyungang, Lianyungang, China (X.Z.); Department of Radiology, Quanzhou First Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China (R.H.); Department of Pathology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Hangzhou, China (R.W.); Digital Medical Research Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China (K.W., S.W.); Shanghai Key Laboratory of MICCAI, Shanghai, China (K.W., S.W.); Xiamen Municipal Clinical Research Center for Medical Imaging, Xiamen, China (J.Z.); and Xiamen Key Clinical Specialty, Xiamen, China (J.Z.)
| | - Pingyi Zhu
- From the Departments of Radiology (C.D., P.Z., Z.S., M.Z., J.Z.), Urology (Y.X., J.G.), and Pathology (J.H.), Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, Shanghai, China (C.D., P.Z., Z.S., M.Z.); Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China (L.Y., F.C.); Departments of Urology (J.L.) and Radiology (J.Z.), Xiamen Branch, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 668 Jinhu Road, Huli District, Xiamen 361015, China; Department of Urology, Zhangye People's Hospital affiliated to Hexi University, Zhangye, China (J.Y.); Department of Radiology, the First People's Hospital of Lianyungang, Lianyungang, China (X.Z.); Department of Radiology, Quanzhou First Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China (R.H.); Department of Pathology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Hangzhou, China (R.W.); Digital Medical Research Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China (K.W., S.W.); Shanghai Key Laboratory of MICCAI, Shanghai, China (K.W., S.W.); Xiamen Municipal Clinical Research Center for Medical Imaging, Xiamen, China (J.Z.); and Xiamen Key Clinical Specialty, Xiamen, China (J.Z.)
| | - Linpeng Yao
- From the Departments of Radiology (C.D., P.Z., Z.S., M.Z., J.Z.), Urology (Y.X., J.G.), and Pathology (J.H.), Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, Shanghai, China (C.D., P.Z., Z.S., M.Z.); Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China (L.Y., F.C.); Departments of Urology (J.L.) and Radiology (J.Z.), Xiamen Branch, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 668 Jinhu Road, Huli District, Xiamen 361015, China; Department of Urology, Zhangye People's Hospital affiliated to Hexi University, Zhangye, China (J.Y.); Department of Radiology, the First People's Hospital of Lianyungang, Lianyungang, China (X.Z.); Department of Radiology, Quanzhou First Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China (R.H.); Department of Pathology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Hangzhou, China (R.W.); Digital Medical Research Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China (K.W., S.W.); Shanghai Key Laboratory of MICCAI, Shanghai, China (K.W., S.W.); Xiamen Municipal Clinical Research Center for Medical Imaging, Xiamen, China (J.Z.); and Xiamen Key Clinical Specialty, Xiamen, China (J.Z.)
| | - Jinglai Lin
- From the Departments of Radiology (C.D., P.Z., Z.S., M.Z., J.Z.), Urology (Y.X., J.G.), and Pathology (J.H.), Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, Shanghai, China (C.D., P.Z., Z.S., M.Z.); Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China (L.Y., F.C.); Departments of Urology (J.L.) and Radiology (J.Z.), Xiamen Branch, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 668 Jinhu Road, Huli District, Xiamen 361015, China; Department of Urology, Zhangye People's Hospital affiliated to Hexi University, Zhangye, China (J.Y.); Department of Radiology, the First People's Hospital of Lianyungang, Lianyungang, China (X.Z.); Department of Radiology, Quanzhou First Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China (R.H.); Department of Pathology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Hangzhou, China (R.W.); Digital Medical Research Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China (K.W., S.W.); Shanghai Key Laboratory of MICCAI, Shanghai, China (K.W., S.W.); Xiamen Municipal Clinical Research Center for Medical Imaging, Xiamen, China (J.Z.); and Xiamen Key Clinical Specialty, Xiamen, China (J.Z.)
| | - Jiaxi Yao
- From the Departments of Radiology (C.D., P.Z., Z.S., M.Z., J.Z.), Urology (Y.X., J.G.), and Pathology (J.H.), Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, Shanghai, China (C.D., P.Z., Z.S., M.Z.); Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China (L.Y., F.C.); Departments of Urology (J.L.) and Radiology (J.Z.), Xiamen Branch, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 668 Jinhu Road, Huli District, Xiamen 361015, China; Department of Urology, Zhangye People's Hospital affiliated to Hexi University, Zhangye, China (J.Y.); Department of Radiology, the First People's Hospital of Lianyungang, Lianyungang, China (X.Z.); Department of Radiology, Quanzhou First Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China (R.H.); Department of Pathology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Hangzhou, China (R.W.); Digital Medical Research Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China (K.W., S.W.); Shanghai Key Laboratory of MICCAI, Shanghai, China (K.W., S.W.); Xiamen Municipal Clinical Research Center for Medical Imaging, Xiamen, China (J.Z.); and Xiamen Key Clinical Specialty, Xiamen, China (J.Z.)
| | - Xue Zhang
- From the Departments of Radiology (C.D., P.Z., Z.S., M.Z., J.Z.), Urology (Y.X., J.G.), and Pathology (J.H.), Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, Shanghai, China (C.D., P.Z., Z.S., M.Z.); Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China (L.Y., F.C.); Departments of Urology (J.L.) and Radiology (J.Z.), Xiamen Branch, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 668 Jinhu Road, Huli District, Xiamen 361015, China; Department of Urology, Zhangye People's Hospital affiliated to Hexi University, Zhangye, China (J.Y.); Department of Radiology, the First People's Hospital of Lianyungang, Lianyungang, China (X.Z.); Department of Radiology, Quanzhou First Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China (R.H.); Department of Pathology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Hangzhou, China (R.W.); Digital Medical Research Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China (K.W., S.W.); Shanghai Key Laboratory of MICCAI, Shanghai, China (K.W., S.W.); Xiamen Municipal Clinical Research Center for Medical Imaging, Xiamen, China (J.Z.); and Xiamen Key Clinical Specialty, Xiamen, China (J.Z.)
| | - Risheng Huang
- From the Departments of Radiology (C.D., P.Z., Z.S., M.Z., J.Z.), Urology (Y.X., J.G.), and Pathology (J.H.), Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, Shanghai, China (C.D., P.Z., Z.S., M.Z.); Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China (L.Y., F.C.); Departments of Urology (J.L.) and Radiology (J.Z.), Xiamen Branch, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 668 Jinhu Road, Huli District, Xiamen 361015, China; Department of Urology, Zhangye People's Hospital affiliated to Hexi University, Zhangye, China (J.Y.); Department of Radiology, the First People's Hospital of Lianyungang, Lianyungang, China (X.Z.); Department of Radiology, Quanzhou First Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China (R.H.); Department of Pathology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Hangzhou, China (R.W.); Digital Medical Research Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China (K.W., S.W.); Shanghai Key Laboratory of MICCAI, Shanghai, China (K.W., S.W.); Xiamen Municipal Clinical Research Center for Medical Imaging, Xiamen, China (J.Z.); and Xiamen Key Clinical Specialty, Xiamen, China (J.Z.)
| | - Run Wang
- From the Departments of Radiology (C.D., P.Z., Z.S., M.Z., J.Z.), Urology (Y.X., J.G.), and Pathology (J.H.), Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, Shanghai, China (C.D., P.Z., Z.S., M.Z.); Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China (L.Y., F.C.); Departments of Urology (J.L.) and Radiology (J.Z.), Xiamen Branch, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 668 Jinhu Road, Huli District, Xiamen 361015, China; Department of Urology, Zhangye People's Hospital affiliated to Hexi University, Zhangye, China (J.Y.); Department of Radiology, the First People's Hospital of Lianyungang, Lianyungang, China (X.Z.); Department of Radiology, Quanzhou First Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China (R.H.); Department of Pathology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Hangzhou, China (R.W.); Digital Medical Research Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China (K.W., S.W.); Shanghai Key Laboratory of MICCAI, Shanghai, China (K.W., S.W.); Xiamen Municipal Clinical Research Center for Medical Imaging, Xiamen, China (J.Z.); and Xiamen Key Clinical Specialty, Xiamen, China (J.Z.)
| | - Jun Hou
- From the Departments of Radiology (C.D., P.Z., Z.S., M.Z., J.Z.), Urology (Y.X., J.G.), and Pathology (J.H.), Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, Shanghai, China (C.D., P.Z., Z.S., M.Z.); Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China (L.Y., F.C.); Departments of Urology (J.L.) and Radiology (J.Z.), Xiamen Branch, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 668 Jinhu Road, Huli District, Xiamen 361015, China; Department of Urology, Zhangye People's Hospital affiliated to Hexi University, Zhangye, China (J.Y.); Department of Radiology, the First People's Hospital of Lianyungang, Lianyungang, China (X.Z.); Department of Radiology, Quanzhou First Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China (R.H.); Department of Pathology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Hangzhou, China (R.W.); Digital Medical Research Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China (K.W., S.W.); Shanghai Key Laboratory of MICCAI, Shanghai, China (K.W., S.W.); Xiamen Municipal Clinical Research Center for Medical Imaging, Xiamen, China (J.Z.); and Xiamen Key Clinical Specialty, Xiamen, China (J.Z.)
| | - Kang Wang
- From the Departments of Radiology (C.D., P.Z., Z.S., M.Z., J.Z.), Urology (Y.X., J.G.), and Pathology (J.H.), Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, Shanghai, China (C.D., P.Z., Z.S., M.Z.); Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China (L.Y., F.C.); Departments of Urology (J.L.) and Radiology (J.Z.), Xiamen Branch, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 668 Jinhu Road, Huli District, Xiamen 361015, China; Department of Urology, Zhangye People's Hospital affiliated to Hexi University, Zhangye, China (J.Y.); Department of Radiology, the First People's Hospital of Lianyungang, Lianyungang, China (X.Z.); Department of Radiology, Quanzhou First Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China (R.H.); Department of Pathology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Hangzhou, China (R.W.); Digital Medical Research Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China (K.W., S.W.); Shanghai Key Laboratory of MICCAI, Shanghai, China (K.W., S.W.); Xiamen Municipal Clinical Research Center for Medical Imaging, Xiamen, China (J.Z.); and Xiamen Key Clinical Specialty, Xiamen, China (J.Z.)
| | - Zhang Shi
- From the Departments of Radiology (C.D., P.Z., Z.S., M.Z., J.Z.), Urology (Y.X., J.G.), and Pathology (J.H.), Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, Shanghai, China (C.D., P.Z., Z.S., M.Z.); Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China (L.Y., F.C.); Departments of Urology (J.L.) and Radiology (J.Z.), Xiamen Branch, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 668 Jinhu Road, Huli District, Xiamen 361015, China; Department of Urology, Zhangye People's Hospital affiliated to Hexi University, Zhangye, China (J.Y.); Department of Radiology, the First People's Hospital of Lianyungang, Lianyungang, China (X.Z.); Department of Radiology, Quanzhou First Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China (R.H.); Department of Pathology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Hangzhou, China (R.W.); Digital Medical Research Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China (K.W., S.W.); Shanghai Key Laboratory of MICCAI, Shanghai, China (K.W., S.W.); Xiamen Municipal Clinical Research Center for Medical Imaging, Xiamen, China (J.Z.); and Xiamen Key Clinical Specialty, Xiamen, China (J.Z.)
| | - Feng Chen
- From the Departments of Radiology (C.D., P.Z., Z.S., M.Z., J.Z.), Urology (Y.X., J.G.), and Pathology (J.H.), Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, Shanghai, China (C.D., P.Z., Z.S., M.Z.); Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China (L.Y., F.C.); Departments of Urology (J.L.) and Radiology (J.Z.), Xiamen Branch, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 668 Jinhu Road, Huli District, Xiamen 361015, China; Department of Urology, Zhangye People's Hospital affiliated to Hexi University, Zhangye, China (J.Y.); Department of Radiology, the First People's Hospital of Lianyungang, Lianyungang, China (X.Z.); Department of Radiology, Quanzhou First Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China (R.H.); Department of Pathology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Hangzhou, China (R.W.); Digital Medical Research Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China (K.W., S.W.); Shanghai Key Laboratory of MICCAI, Shanghai, China (K.W., S.W.); Xiamen Municipal Clinical Research Center for Medical Imaging, Xiamen, China (J.Z.); and Xiamen Key Clinical Specialty, Xiamen, China (J.Z.)
| | - Jianming Guo
- From the Departments of Radiology (C.D., P.Z., Z.S., M.Z., J.Z.), Urology (Y.X., J.G.), and Pathology (J.H.), Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, Shanghai, China (C.D., P.Z., Z.S., M.Z.); Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China (L.Y., F.C.); Departments of Urology (J.L.) and Radiology (J.Z.), Xiamen Branch, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 668 Jinhu Road, Huli District, Xiamen 361015, China; Department of Urology, Zhangye People's Hospital affiliated to Hexi University, Zhangye, China (J.Y.); Department of Radiology, the First People's Hospital of Lianyungang, Lianyungang, China (X.Z.); Department of Radiology, Quanzhou First Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China (R.H.); Department of Pathology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Hangzhou, China (R.W.); Digital Medical Research Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China (K.W., S.W.); Shanghai Key Laboratory of MICCAI, Shanghai, China (K.W., S.W.); Xiamen Municipal Clinical Research Center for Medical Imaging, Xiamen, China (J.Z.); and Xiamen Key Clinical Specialty, Xiamen, China (J.Z.)
| | - Mengsu Zeng
- From the Departments of Radiology (C.D., P.Z., Z.S., M.Z., J.Z.), Urology (Y.X., J.G.), and Pathology (J.H.), Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, Shanghai, China (C.D., P.Z., Z.S., M.Z.); Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China (L.Y., F.C.); Departments of Urology (J.L.) and Radiology (J.Z.), Xiamen Branch, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 668 Jinhu Road, Huli District, Xiamen 361015, China; Department of Urology, Zhangye People's Hospital affiliated to Hexi University, Zhangye, China (J.Y.); Department of Radiology, the First People's Hospital of Lianyungang, Lianyungang, China (X.Z.); Department of Radiology, Quanzhou First Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China (R.H.); Department of Pathology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Hangzhou, China (R.W.); Digital Medical Research Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China (K.W., S.W.); Shanghai Key Laboratory of MICCAI, Shanghai, China (K.W., S.W.); Xiamen Municipal Clinical Research Center for Medical Imaging, Xiamen, China (J.Z.); and Xiamen Key Clinical Specialty, Xiamen, China (J.Z.)
| | - Jianjun Zhou
- From the Departments of Radiology (C.D., P.Z., Z.S., M.Z., J.Z.), Urology (Y.X., J.G.), and Pathology (J.H.), Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, Shanghai, China (C.D., P.Z., Z.S., M.Z.); Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China (L.Y., F.C.); Departments of Urology (J.L.) and Radiology (J.Z.), Xiamen Branch, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 668 Jinhu Road, Huli District, Xiamen 361015, China; Department of Urology, Zhangye People's Hospital affiliated to Hexi University, Zhangye, China (J.Y.); Department of Radiology, the First People's Hospital of Lianyungang, Lianyungang, China (X.Z.); Department of Radiology, Quanzhou First Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China (R.H.); Department of Pathology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Hangzhou, China (R.W.); Digital Medical Research Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China (K.W., S.W.); Shanghai Key Laboratory of MICCAI, Shanghai, China (K.W., S.W.); Xiamen Municipal Clinical Research Center for Medical Imaging, Xiamen, China (J.Z.); and Xiamen Key Clinical Specialty, Xiamen, China (J.Z.)
| | - Shuo Wang
- From the Departments of Radiology (C.D., P.Z., Z.S., M.Z., J.Z.), Urology (Y.X., J.G.), and Pathology (J.H.), Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, Shanghai, China (C.D., P.Z., Z.S., M.Z.); Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China (L.Y., F.C.); Departments of Urology (J.L.) and Radiology (J.Z.), Xiamen Branch, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 668 Jinhu Road, Huli District, Xiamen 361015, China; Department of Urology, Zhangye People's Hospital affiliated to Hexi University, Zhangye, China (J.Y.); Department of Radiology, the First People's Hospital of Lianyungang, Lianyungang, China (X.Z.); Department of Radiology, Quanzhou First Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China (R.H.); Department of Pathology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Hangzhou, China (R.W.); Digital Medical Research Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China (K.W., S.W.); Shanghai Key Laboratory of MICCAI, Shanghai, China (K.W., S.W.); Xiamen Municipal Clinical Research Center for Medical Imaging, Xiamen, China (J.Z.); and Xiamen Key Clinical Specialty, Xiamen, China (J.Z.)
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Lucocq J, Morgan L, Rathod K, Szewczyk-Bieda M, Nabi G. Validation of the updated Bosniak classification (2019) in pathologically confirmed CT-categorised cysts. Scott Med J 2024; 69:18-23. [PMID: 38111318 DOI: 10.1177/00369330231221235] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The updated Bosniak classification in 2019 (v2019) addresses vague imaging terms and revises the criteria with the intent to categorise a higher proportion of cysts in lower-risk groups and reduce benign cyst resections. The aim of the present study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy and inter-observer agreement rate of the original (v2005) and updated classifications (v2019). METHOD Resected/biopsied cysts were categorised according to Bosniak classifications (v2005 and v2019) and the diagnostic accuracy was assessed with reference to histopathological analysis. The inter-observer agreement of v2005 and v2019 was determined. RESULTS The malignancy rate of the cohort was 83.6% (51/61). Using v2019, a higher proportion of malignant cysts were categorised as Bosniak ≥ III (88.2% vs 84.3%) and a significantly higher percentage were categorised as Bosniak IV (68.9% vs 47.1%; p = 0.049) in comparison to v2005. v2019 would have resulted in less benign cyst resections (13.5% vs 15.7%). Calcified versus non-calcified cysts had lower rates of malignancy (57.1% vs 91.5%; RR,0.62; p = 0.002). The inter-observer agreement of v2005 was higher than that of v2019 (kappa, 0.70 vs kappa, 0.43). DISCUSSION The updated classification improves the categorisation of malignant cysts and reduces benign cyst resection. The low inter-observer agreement remains a challenge to the updated classification system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Lucocq
- Department of General Surgery, Victoria Hospital Kirkcaldy, Kirkcaldy, UK
| | - Leo Morgan
- Department of General Surgery, Victoria Hospital Kirkcaldy, Kirkcaldy, UK
| | - Ketan Rathod
- Department of Radiology, Ninewells Hospital, Dundee, UK
| | | | - Ghulam Nabi
- Department of Urology, Ninewells Hospital, Division of Imaging Sciences and Technology, School of Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Trovato P, Simonetti I, Morrone A, Fusco R, Setola SV, Giacobbe G, Brunese MC, Pecchi A, Triggiani S, Pellegrino G, Petralia G, Sica G, Petrillo A, Granata V. Scientific Status Quo of Small Renal Lesions: Diagnostic Assessment and Radiomics. J Clin Med 2024; 13:547. [PMID: 38256682 PMCID: PMC10816509 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13020547] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2023] [Revised: 01/05/2024] [Accepted: 01/16/2024] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: Small renal masses (SRMs) are defined as contrast-enhanced renal lesions less than or equal to 4 cm in maximal diameter, which can be compatible with stage T1a renal cell carcinomas (RCCs). Currently, 50-61% of all renal tumors are found incidentally. Methods: The characteristics of the lesion influence the choice of the type of management, which include several methods SRM of management, including nephrectomy, partial nephrectomy, ablation, observation, and also stereotactic body radiotherapy. Typical imaging methods available for differentiating benign from malignant renal lesions include ultrasound (US), contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Results: Although ultrasound is the first imaging technique used to detect small renal lesions, it has several limitations. CT is the main and most widely used imaging technique for SRM characterization. The main advantages of MRI compared to CT are the better contrast resolution and tissue characterization, the use of functional imaging sequences, the possibility of performing the examination in patients allergic to iodine-containing contrast medium, and the absence of exposure to ionizing radiation. For a correct evaluation during imaging follow-up, it is necessary to use a reliable method for the assessment of renal lesions, represented by the Bosniak classification system. This classification was initially developed based on contrast-enhanced CT imaging findings, and the 2019 revision proposed the inclusion of MRI features; however, the latest classification has not yet received widespread validation. Conclusions: The use of radiomics in the evaluation of renal masses is an emerging and increasingly central field with several applications such as characterizing renal masses, distinguishing RCC subtypes, monitoring response to targeted therapeutic agents, and prognosis in a metastatic context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Piero Trovato
- Radiology Division, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, 80131 Naples, Italy; (P.T.); (I.S.); (S.V.S.); (A.P.); (V.G.)
| | - Igino Simonetti
- Radiology Division, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, 80131 Naples, Italy; (P.T.); (I.S.); (S.V.S.); (A.P.); (V.G.)
| | - Alessio Morrone
- Division of Radiology, Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 80138 Naples, Italy;
| | - Roberta Fusco
- Medical Oncology Division, Igea SpA, 80013 Naples, Italy
- Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, Via della Signora 2, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Sergio Venanzio Setola
- Radiology Division, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, 80131 Naples, Italy; (P.T.); (I.S.); (S.V.S.); (A.P.); (V.G.)
| | - Giuliana Giacobbe
- General and Emergency Radiology Department, “Antonio Cardarelli” Hospital, 80131 Naples, Italy;
| | - Maria Chiara Brunese
- Diagnostic Imaging Section, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences & Neurosciences, University of Molise, 86100 Campobasso, Italy;
| | - Annarita Pecchi
- Department of Radiology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41121 Modena, Italy;
| | - Sonia Triggiani
- Postgraduate School of Radiodiagnostics, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy; (S.T.); (G.P.)
| | - Giuseppe Pellegrino
- Postgraduate School of Radiodiagnostics, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy; (S.T.); (G.P.)
| | - Giuseppe Petralia
- Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy;
| | - Giacomo Sica
- Radiology Unit, Monaldi Hospital, Azienda Ospedaliera dei Colli, 80131 Naples, Italy;
| | - Antonella Petrillo
- Radiology Division, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, 80131 Naples, Italy; (P.T.); (I.S.); (S.V.S.); (A.P.); (V.G.)
| | - Vincenza Granata
- Radiology Division, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, 80131 Naples, Italy; (P.T.); (I.S.); (S.V.S.); (A.P.); (V.G.)
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Lan L, Yang Y, Xu ZQ, Jin XC, Huang KT, Chen YX, Yang CX, Zhou M. Clinical Evaluation of Cystic Renal Masses With Bosniak Classification by Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound and Contrast-Enhanced Computer Tomography. JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE : OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE 2023; 42:2845-2858. [PMID: 37732901 DOI: 10.1002/jum.16324] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2022] [Revised: 08/10/2023] [Accepted: 08/11/2023] [Indexed: 09/22/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The study aims to compare retrospectively three clinically applied methods for the diagnostic performance of cystic renal masses (CRMs) by contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and contrast-enhanced computer tomography (CECT) with Bosniak classification system. METHODS A total of 52 cases of Bosniak II-IV CRMs in 49 consecutive patients were diagnosed from January 2013 to July 2022 and their data were analyzed. All patients had been subjected to CEUS and CECT simultaneously. Pathological diagnoses and masses stability were used as standard references to determine whether lesions were malignant or benign. Then 49 CRMs only with pathologic results were classified into group 1 and 2. RESULTS A total of 52 CRMs in 49 enrolled patients were classified into 8 category II, 16 category IIF, 15 category III, and 13 category IV by CEUS (EFSUMB 2020), 10 category II, 13 category IIF, 16 category III, and 13 category IV by CEUS (V2019), while 15 category II, 9 category IIF, 13 category III, and 15 category IV by CECT (V2019). Pathological results and masses stability longer than 5 years follow-up performed substantially for CEUS (EFSUMB 2020), CEUS (V2019), and CECT (V2019) (kappa values were 0.696, 0.735, and 0.696, respectively). Among 49 pathologic approving CRMs, wall/septation thickness ≥4 mm, wall/septation thickness, presence of enhancing nodule and the diameter were found to be statistically significant for malignancy. Twenty-two malignant masses were correctly diagnosed by CEUS (V2019), while 21 malignant masses were both correctly diagnosed by CEUS (EFSUMB 2020) and CECT (V2019), and 1 mass was misdiagnosed. CONCLUSIONS Bosniak classification of EFSUMB 2020 version might be as accurate as version 2019 CEUS and version 2019 CECT in diagnosing CRMs, and CEUS is found to have an excellent safety profile in dealing with clinical works.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Li Lan
- Department of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| | - Yu Yang
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| | - Zi-Qiang Xu
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| | - Xuan-Chen Jin
- School of the First Clinical Medical Sciences (School of Information and Engineering), Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| | - Ka-Te Huang
- Department of Pathology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| | - Yu-Xuan Chen
- School of the First Clinical Medical Sciences (School of Information and Engineering), Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| | - Chen-Xing Yang
- Department of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| | - Man Zhou
- Department of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Gomma MK, El-Toukhy NAEG, El-Ghar MIA, Bayoumi DM. Role of magnetic resonance imaging in characterization of cystic renal lesions based on Bosniak classification version 2019. THE EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE 2023; 54:201. [DOI: 10.1186/s43055-023-01154-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2023] [Accepted: 11/18/2023] [Indexed: 07/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
In 2019, the Bosniak classification system for cystic renal lesions underwent modifications aimed at addressing the limitations of the original classification.
Results
The revised 2019 version demonstrated notable differences from its predecessor. Specifically, it showed an increased proportion of class IIF cystic lesions (31% compared to 16.7%) and a decreased proportion of class III cystic lesions (27.4% compared to 45.2%). Additionally, the malignancy rate for class III cystic renal lesions was lower in the 2019 version (37.8% vs. 42.2%). When it came to diagnosing malignancies, the 2019 version exhibited higher specificity (74.4% compared to 41.03%) while maintaining a comparable sensitivity (97.8% vs. 100%) compared to the original Bosniak system.
Conclusions
The Bosniak 2019 version demonstrated enhanced specificity and diagnostic accuracy for malignancies in comparison to the original Bosniak system, all while maintaining an equivalent sensitivity.
Collapse
|
15
|
Shetty AS, Fraum TJ, Ballard DH, Hoegger MJ, Itani M, Rajput MZ, Lanier MH, Cusworth BM, Mehrsheikh AL, Cabrera-Lebron JA, Chu J, Cunningham CR, Hirschi RS, Mokkarala M, Unteriner JG, Kim EH, Siegel CL, Ludwig DR. Renal Mass Imaging with MRI Clear Cell Likelihood Score: A User's Guide. Radiographics 2023; 43:e220209. [PMID: 37319026 DOI: 10.1148/rg.220209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
Small solid renal masses (SRMs) are frequently detected at imaging. Nearly 20% are benign, making careful evaluation with MRI an important consideration before deciding on management. Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is the most common renal cell carcinoma subtype with potentially aggressive behavior. Thus, confident identification of ccRCC imaging features is a critical task for the radiologist. Imaging features distinguishing ccRCC from other benign and malignant renal masses are based on major features (T2 signal intensity, corticomedullary phase enhancement, and the presence of microscopic fat) and ancillary features (segmental enhancement inversion, arterial-to-delayed enhancement ratio, and diffusion restriction). The clear cell likelihood score (ccLS) system was recently devised to provide a standardized framework for categorizing SRMs, offering a Likert score of the likelihood of ccRCC ranging from 1 (very unlikely) to 5 (very likely). Alternative diagnoses based on imaging appearance are also suggested by the algorithm. Furthermore, the ccLS system aims to stratify which patients may or may not benefit from biopsy. The authors use case examples to guide the reader through the evaluation of major and ancillary MRI features of the ccLS algorithm for assigning a likelihood score to an SRM. The authors also discuss patient selection, imaging parameters, pitfalls, and areas for future development. The goal is for radiologists to be better equipped to guide management and improve shared decision making between the patient and treating physician. © RSNA, 2023 Quiz questions for this article are available in the supplemental material. See the invited commentary by Pedrosa in this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anup S Shetty
- From the Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology (A.S.S., T.J.F., D.H.B., M.J.H., M.I., M.Z.R., M.H.L., B.M.C., A.L.M., J.A.C.L., J.C., C.R.C., R.S.H., M.M., J.G.U., C.L.S., D.R.L.) and Division of Urologic Surgery (E.H.K.), Washington University School of Medicine, 510 S Kingshighway Blvd, Campus Box 8131, St Louis, MO 63110
| | - Tyler J Fraum
- From the Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology (A.S.S., T.J.F., D.H.B., M.J.H., M.I., M.Z.R., M.H.L., B.M.C., A.L.M., J.A.C.L., J.C., C.R.C., R.S.H., M.M., J.G.U., C.L.S., D.R.L.) and Division of Urologic Surgery (E.H.K.), Washington University School of Medicine, 510 S Kingshighway Blvd, Campus Box 8131, St Louis, MO 63110
| | - David H Ballard
- From the Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology (A.S.S., T.J.F., D.H.B., M.J.H., M.I., M.Z.R., M.H.L., B.M.C., A.L.M., J.A.C.L., J.C., C.R.C., R.S.H., M.M., J.G.U., C.L.S., D.R.L.) and Division of Urologic Surgery (E.H.K.), Washington University School of Medicine, 510 S Kingshighway Blvd, Campus Box 8131, St Louis, MO 63110
| | - Mark J Hoegger
- From the Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology (A.S.S., T.J.F., D.H.B., M.J.H., M.I., M.Z.R., M.H.L., B.M.C., A.L.M., J.A.C.L., J.C., C.R.C., R.S.H., M.M., J.G.U., C.L.S., D.R.L.) and Division of Urologic Surgery (E.H.K.), Washington University School of Medicine, 510 S Kingshighway Blvd, Campus Box 8131, St Louis, MO 63110
| | - Malak Itani
- From the Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology (A.S.S., T.J.F., D.H.B., M.J.H., M.I., M.Z.R., M.H.L., B.M.C., A.L.M., J.A.C.L., J.C., C.R.C., R.S.H., M.M., J.G.U., C.L.S., D.R.L.) and Division of Urologic Surgery (E.H.K.), Washington University School of Medicine, 510 S Kingshighway Blvd, Campus Box 8131, St Louis, MO 63110
| | - Mohamed Z Rajput
- From the Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology (A.S.S., T.J.F., D.H.B., M.J.H., M.I., M.Z.R., M.H.L., B.M.C., A.L.M., J.A.C.L., J.C., C.R.C., R.S.H., M.M., J.G.U., C.L.S., D.R.L.) and Division of Urologic Surgery (E.H.K.), Washington University School of Medicine, 510 S Kingshighway Blvd, Campus Box 8131, St Louis, MO 63110
| | - Michael H Lanier
- From the Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology (A.S.S., T.J.F., D.H.B., M.J.H., M.I., M.Z.R., M.H.L., B.M.C., A.L.M., J.A.C.L., J.C., C.R.C., R.S.H., M.M., J.G.U., C.L.S., D.R.L.) and Division of Urologic Surgery (E.H.K.), Washington University School of Medicine, 510 S Kingshighway Blvd, Campus Box 8131, St Louis, MO 63110
| | - Brian M Cusworth
- From the Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology (A.S.S., T.J.F., D.H.B., M.J.H., M.I., M.Z.R., M.H.L., B.M.C., A.L.M., J.A.C.L., J.C., C.R.C., R.S.H., M.M., J.G.U., C.L.S., D.R.L.) and Division of Urologic Surgery (E.H.K.), Washington University School of Medicine, 510 S Kingshighway Blvd, Campus Box 8131, St Louis, MO 63110
| | - Amanda L Mehrsheikh
- From the Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology (A.S.S., T.J.F., D.H.B., M.J.H., M.I., M.Z.R., M.H.L., B.M.C., A.L.M., J.A.C.L., J.C., C.R.C., R.S.H., M.M., J.G.U., C.L.S., D.R.L.) and Division of Urologic Surgery (E.H.K.), Washington University School of Medicine, 510 S Kingshighway Blvd, Campus Box 8131, St Louis, MO 63110
| | - Jorge A Cabrera-Lebron
- From the Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology (A.S.S., T.J.F., D.H.B., M.J.H., M.I., M.Z.R., M.H.L., B.M.C., A.L.M., J.A.C.L., J.C., C.R.C., R.S.H., M.M., J.G.U., C.L.S., D.R.L.) and Division of Urologic Surgery (E.H.K.), Washington University School of Medicine, 510 S Kingshighway Blvd, Campus Box 8131, St Louis, MO 63110
| | - Jia Chu
- From the Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology (A.S.S., T.J.F., D.H.B., M.J.H., M.I., M.Z.R., M.H.L., B.M.C., A.L.M., J.A.C.L., J.C., C.R.C., R.S.H., M.M., J.G.U., C.L.S., D.R.L.) and Division of Urologic Surgery (E.H.K.), Washington University School of Medicine, 510 S Kingshighway Blvd, Campus Box 8131, St Louis, MO 63110
| | - Christopher R Cunningham
- From the Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology (A.S.S., T.J.F., D.H.B., M.J.H., M.I., M.Z.R., M.H.L., B.M.C., A.L.M., J.A.C.L., J.C., C.R.C., R.S.H., M.M., J.G.U., C.L.S., D.R.L.) and Division of Urologic Surgery (E.H.K.), Washington University School of Medicine, 510 S Kingshighway Blvd, Campus Box 8131, St Louis, MO 63110
| | - Ryan S Hirschi
- From the Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology (A.S.S., T.J.F., D.H.B., M.J.H., M.I., M.Z.R., M.H.L., B.M.C., A.L.M., J.A.C.L., J.C., C.R.C., R.S.H., M.M., J.G.U., C.L.S., D.R.L.) and Division of Urologic Surgery (E.H.K.), Washington University School of Medicine, 510 S Kingshighway Blvd, Campus Box 8131, St Louis, MO 63110
| | - Mahati Mokkarala
- From the Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology (A.S.S., T.J.F., D.H.B., M.J.H., M.I., M.Z.R., M.H.L., B.M.C., A.L.M., J.A.C.L., J.C., C.R.C., R.S.H., M.M., J.G.U., C.L.S., D.R.L.) and Division of Urologic Surgery (E.H.K.), Washington University School of Medicine, 510 S Kingshighway Blvd, Campus Box 8131, St Louis, MO 63110
| | - Jackson G Unteriner
- From the Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology (A.S.S., T.J.F., D.H.B., M.J.H., M.I., M.Z.R., M.H.L., B.M.C., A.L.M., J.A.C.L., J.C., C.R.C., R.S.H., M.M., J.G.U., C.L.S., D.R.L.) and Division of Urologic Surgery (E.H.K.), Washington University School of Medicine, 510 S Kingshighway Blvd, Campus Box 8131, St Louis, MO 63110
| | - Eric H Kim
- From the Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology (A.S.S., T.J.F., D.H.B., M.J.H., M.I., M.Z.R., M.H.L., B.M.C., A.L.M., J.A.C.L., J.C., C.R.C., R.S.H., M.M., J.G.U., C.L.S., D.R.L.) and Division of Urologic Surgery (E.H.K.), Washington University School of Medicine, 510 S Kingshighway Blvd, Campus Box 8131, St Louis, MO 63110
| | - Cary L Siegel
- From the Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology (A.S.S., T.J.F., D.H.B., M.J.H., M.I., M.Z.R., M.H.L., B.M.C., A.L.M., J.A.C.L., J.C., C.R.C., R.S.H., M.M., J.G.U., C.L.S., D.R.L.) and Division of Urologic Surgery (E.H.K.), Washington University School of Medicine, 510 S Kingshighway Blvd, Campus Box 8131, St Louis, MO 63110
| | - Daniel R Ludwig
- From the Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology (A.S.S., T.J.F., D.H.B., M.J.H., M.I., M.Z.R., M.H.L., B.M.C., A.L.M., J.A.C.L., J.C., C.R.C., R.S.H., M.M., J.G.U., C.L.S., D.R.L.) and Division of Urologic Surgery (E.H.K.), Washington University School of Medicine, 510 S Kingshighway Blvd, Campus Box 8131, St Louis, MO 63110
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Almalki YE, Basha MAA, Refaat R, Alduraibi SK, Abdalla AAEHM, Yousef HY, Zaitoun MMA, Elsayed SB, Mahmoud NEM, Alayouty NA, Ali SA, Alnaggar AA, Saber S, El-Maghraby AM, Elsheikh AM, Radwan MHSS, Abdelmegid AGI, Aly SA, Shanab WSA, Obaya AA, Abdelhai SF, Elshorbagy S, Haggag YM, Mokhtar HM, Sabry NM, Altohamy JI, Abouelkheir RT, Omran T, Shalan A, Algazzar YH, Metwally MI. Bosniak classification version 2019: a prospective comparison of CT and MRI. Eur Radiol 2023; 33:1286-1296. [PMID: 35962816 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-022-09044-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2022] [Revised: 06/13/2022] [Accepted: 07/19/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the diagnostic accuracy and agreement of CT and MRI in terms of the Bosniak classification version 2019 (BCv2019). MATERIALS AND METHODS A prospective multi-institutional study enrolled 63 patients with 67 complicated cystic renal masses (CRMs) discovered during ultrasound examination. All patients underwent CT and MRI scans and histopathology. Three radiologists independently assessed CRMs using BCv2019 and assigned Bosniak class to each CRM using CT and MRI. The final analysis included 60 histopathologically confirmed CRMs (41 were malignant and 19 were benign). RESULTS Discordance between CT and MRI findings was noticed in 50% (30/60) CRMs when data were analyzed in terms of the Bosniak classes. Of these, 16 (53.3%) were malignant. Based on consensus reviewing, there was no difference in the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the BCv2019 with MRI and BCv2019 with CT (87.8%; 95% CI = 73.8-95.9% versus 75.6%; 95% CI = 59.7-87.6%; p = 0.09, 84.2%; 95% CI = 60.4-96.6% versus 78.9%; 95% CI = 54.4-93.9%; p = 0.5, and 86.7%; 95% CI = 64.0-86.6% versus 76.7%; 95% CI = 75.4-94.1%; p = 0.1, respectively). The number and thickness of septa and the presence of enhanced nodules accounted for the majority of variations in Bosniak classes between CT and MRI. The inter-reader agreement (IRA) was substantial for determining the Bosniak class in CT and MRI (k = 0.66; 95% CI = 0.54-0.76, k = 0.62; 95% CI = 0.50-0.73, respectively). The inter-modality agreement of the BCv219 between CT and MRI was moderate (κ = 0.58). CONCLUSION In terms of BCv2019, CT and MRI are comparable in the classification of CRMs with no significant difference in diagnostic accuracy and reliability. KEY POINTS • There is no significant difference in the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the BCv2019 with MRI and BCv2019 with CT. • The number of septa and their thickness and the presence of enhanced nodules accounted for the majority of variations in Bosniak classes between CT and MRI. • The inter-reader agreement was substantial for determining the Bosniak class in CT and MRI and the inter-modality agreement of the BCv219 between CT and MRI was moderate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yassir Edrees Almalki
- Division of Radiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical College, Najran University, Najran, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | | | - Rania Refaat
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Intervention and Molecular Imaging, Faculty of Human Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Sharifa Khalid Alduraibi
- Department of Radiology, College of Medicine, Qassim University, Buraidah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | | | - Hala Y Yousef
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Faculty of Human Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt
| | - Mohamed M A Zaitoun
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Faculty of Human Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt
| | - Saeed Bakry Elsayed
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Faculty of Human Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt
| | - Nader E M Mahmoud
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Faculty of Human Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt
| | - Nader Ali Alayouty
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Faculty of Human Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt
| | - Susan Adil Ali
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Intervention and Molecular Imaging, Faculty of Human Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Ahmad Abdullah Alnaggar
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Faculty of Human Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt
| | - Sameh Saber
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Faculty of Human Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt
| | | | - Amgad M Elsheikh
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Faculty of Human Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt
| | | | | | - Sameh Abdelaziz Aly
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Faculty of Human Medicine, Benha University, Benha, Egypt
| | - Waleed S Abo Shanab
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Faculty of Human Medicine, Port Said University, Port Said, Egypt
| | - Ahmed Ali Obaya
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Faculty of Human Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt
| | - Shaimaa Farouk Abdelhai
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Faculty of Human Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt
| | - Shereen Elshorbagy
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Human Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt
| | - Yasser M Haggag
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Human Medicine, Al Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Hwaida M Mokhtar
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Faculty of Human Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt
| | - Nesreen M Sabry
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Faculty of Human Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt
| | - Jehan Ibrahim Altohamy
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Institute of Urology and Nephrology, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Rasha Taha Abouelkheir
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Urology and Nephrology Center, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
| | - Tawfik Omran
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Faculty of Human Medicine, Helwan University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Ahmed Shalan
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Faculty of Human Medicine, Benha University, Benha, Egypt
| | | | - Maha Ibrahim Metwally
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Faculty of Human Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Odedra D, Sabongui S, Khalili K, Schieda N, Pei Y, Krishna S. Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease: Role of Imaging in Diagnosis and Management. Radiographics 2023; 43:e220126. [DOI: 10.1148/rg.220126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
|
18
|
Forookhi A, Bicchetti M, Lucciola S, Porreca A, Busetto GM, Del Monte M. The thin line that made the difference: a case report on a Bosniak IIF renal cystic mass treated with cyst decortication. THE EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE 2022. [DOI: 10.1186/s43055-022-00791-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Among all benign kidney lesions, renal cysts are the most common type. In the proposed update of 2019, the Bosniak classification of cystic renal masses is used to classify renal masses according to their likelihood of malignancy, both on computed tomography (CT) and on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
Case presentation
A middle-aged Caucasian male presented to our department with chronic right flank pain. Imaging studies revealed a right renal Bosniak IIF cyst, later complicated by traumatic haemorrhage. The patient consequently underwent cyst decortication for symptom relief. Biopsy results from samples taken during the laparoscopic operation revealed ISUP grade 1 cystic clear cell carcinoma.
Conclusion
The treatment of Bosniak IIF cysts has long been a matter of debate. As a result of scarcity of data on the probability of malignancy in MRI using the new classification, such cysts should be carefully scrutinised and staged before choosing a treatment option. Retroperitoneal seeding should always be considered in interventions involving an incomplete resection margin or cyst drainage.
Collapse
|
19
|
Zhang Q, Dai X, Li W. Diagnostic performance of the Bosniak classification, version 2019 for cystic renal masses: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Oncol 2022; 12:931592. [PMID: 36330503 PMCID: PMC9623069 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.931592] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2022] [Accepted: 09/26/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To systematically assess the diagnostic performance of the Bosniak classification, version 2019 for risk stratification of cystic renal masses. Methods We conducted an electronic literature search on Web of Science, MEDLINE (Ovid and PubMed), Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Google Scholar to identify relevant articles between June 1, 2019 and March 31, 2022 that used the Bosniak classification, version 2019 for risk stratification of cystic renal masses. Summary estimates of sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (LR+), negative likelihood ratio (LR−), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were pooled with the bivariate model and hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) model. The quality of the included studies was assessed with the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool. Results A total of eight studies comprising 720 patients were included. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.85 (95% CI 0.79–0.90) and 0.68 (95% CI 0.58–0.76), respectively, for the class III/IV threshold, with a calculated area under the HSROC curve of 0.84 (95% CI 0.81–0.87). The pooled LR+, LR−, and DOR were 2.62 (95% CI 2.0–3.44), 0.22 (95% CI 0.16–0.32), and 11.7 (95% CI 6.8–20.0), respectively. The Higgins I2 statistics demonstrated substantial heterogeneity across studies, with an I2 of 57.8% for sensitivity and an I2 of 74.6% for specificity. In subgroup analyses, the pooled sensitivity and specificity for CT were 0.86 and 0.71, respectively, and those for MRI were 0.87 and 0.67, respectively. In five studies providing a head-to-head comparison between the two versions of the Bosniak classification, the 2019 version demonstrated significantly higher specificity (0.62 vs. 0.41, p < 0.001); however, it came at the cost of a significant decrease in sensitivity (0.88 vs. 0.94, p = 0.001). Conclusions The Bosniak classification, version 2019 demonstrated moderate sensitivity and specificity, and there was no difference in diagnostic accuracy between CT and MRI. Compared to version 2005, the Bosniak classification, version 2019 has the potential to significantly reduce overtreatment, but at the cost of a substantial decline in sensitivity.
Collapse
|
20
|
Cao J, Lennartz S, Pisuchpen N, Mroueh N, Kongboonvijit S, Parakh A, Sahani DV, Kambadakone A. Renal Lesion Characterization by Dual-Layer Dual-Energy CT: Comparison of Virtual and True Unenhanced Images. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2022; 219:614-623. [PMID: 35441533 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.21.27272] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND. Prior studies have provided mixed results for the ability to replace true unenhanced (TUE) images with virtual unenhanced (VUE) images when characterizing renal lesions by dual-energy CT (DECT). Detector-based dual-layer DECT (dlDECT) systems may optimize performance of VUE images for this purpose. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this article was to compare dual-phase dlDECT examinations evaluated using VUE and TUE images in differentiating cystic and solid renal masses. METHODS. This retrospective study included 110 patients (mean age, 64.3 ± 11.8 years; 46 women, 64 men) who underwent renal-mass protocol dlDECT between July 2018 and February 2022. TUE, VUE, and nephrographic phase image sets were reconstructed. Lesions were diagnosed as solid masses by histopathology or MRI. Lesions were diagnosed as cysts by composite criteria reflecting findings from MRI, ultrasound, and the TUE and nephrographic phase images of the dlDECT examinations. One radiologist measured lesions' attenuation on all dlDECT image sets. Lesion characterization was compared between use of VUE and TUE images, including when considering enhancement of 20 HU or greater to indicate presence of a solid mass. RESULTS. The analysis included 219 lesions (33 solid masses; 186 cysts [132 simple, 20 septate, 34 hyperattenuating]). TUE and VUE attenuation were significantly different for solid masses (33.4 ± 7.1 HU vs 35.4 ± 8.6 HU, p = .002), simple cysts (10.8 ± 5.6 HU vs 7.1 ± 8.1 HU, p < .001), and hyperattenuating cysts (56.3 ± 21.0 HU vs 47.6 ± 16.3 HU, p < .001), but not septate cysts (13.6 ± 8.1 HU vs 14.0 ± 6.8 HU, p = .79). Frequency of enhancement 20 HU or greater when using TUE and VUE images was 90.9% and 90.9% in solid masses, 0.0% and 9.1% in simple cysts, 15.0% and 10.0% in septate cysts, and 11.8% and 38.2% in hyperattenuating cysts. All solid lesions were concordant in terms of enhancement 20 HU or greater when using TUE and VUE images. Twelve simple cysts and nine hyperattenuating cysts showed enhancement of 20 HU or greater when using VUE but not TUE images. CONCLUSION. Use of VUE images reliably detected enhancement in solid masses. However, VUE images underestimated attenuation of simple and hyperattenuating cysts, leading to false-positive findings of enhancement by such lesions. CLINICAL IMPACT. The findings do not support replacement of TUE acquisitions with VUE images when characterizing renal lesions by dlDECT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jinjin Cao
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit St, White 270, Boston, MA 02114-2696
| | - Simon Lennartz
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit St, White 270, Boston, MA 02114-2696
- Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Nisanard Pisuchpen
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit St, White 270, Boston, MA 02114-2696
- Department of Radiology, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Nayla Mroueh
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit St, White 270, Boston, MA 02114-2696
| | - Sasiprang Kongboonvijit
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit St, White 270, Boston, MA 02114-2696
- Department of Radiology, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Anushri Parakh
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit St, White 270, Boston, MA 02114-2696
| | | | - Avinash Kambadakone
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit St, White 270, Boston, MA 02114-2696
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Bosniak Classification Version 2019: A CT-Based Update for Radiologists. CURRENT RADIOLOGY REPORTS 2022. [DOI: 10.1007/s40134-022-00397-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
22
|
Clinical utility of the Bosniak classification version 2019: Diagnostic value of adding magnetic resonance imaging to computed tomography examination. Eur J Radiol 2022; 148:110163. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2021] [Revised: 01/11/2022] [Accepted: 01/13/2022] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
|
23
|
Bosniak Classification Version 2019: Point-Early Validation of The Updated Classification System Supports Clinical Application. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2021; 218:419-420. [PMID: 34549606 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.21.26709] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
|
24
|
Siegel CL, Cohan R. Invited Commentary: Use of Bosniak Classification, Version 2019 in Clinical Practice. Radiographics 2021; 41:E75-E76. [PMID: 33871304 DOI: 10.1148/rg.2021210013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Cary Lynn Siegel
- From the Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, 510 S Kingshighway Blvd, St Louis, MO 63110 (C.L.S.); and Department of Radiology, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (R.C.)
| | - Richard Cohan
- From the Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, 510 S Kingshighway Blvd, St Louis, MO 63110 (C.L.S.); and Department of Radiology, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (R.C.)
| |
Collapse
|