Transcatheter obliteration of gastric varices. Part 1. Anatomic classification

Variceal and Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding Refractory to Endoscopic Management: Indications and Role of Interventional Radiology

For over 60 years, diagnostic and interventional radiology have been heavily involved in the evaluation and treatment of patients presenting with gastrointestinal bleeding. For patients who present with upper GI bleeding and have a contraindication to endoscopy or have an unsuccessful attempt at endoscopy for identifying or controlling the bleeding, interventional radiology is often consulted for evaluation and consideration of catheter-based intervention.

Endoscopic procedures in hepatology: Current trends and new developments

Gastrointestinal endoscopy has long been a reliable backbone in the diagnosis and management of hepatobilary disorders and their complications. However, with evolving non-invasive testing, personalised medicine has reframed the utility and necessity of endoscopic screening. Conversely, the growing interest and use of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and advanced endoscopy within gastrointestinal units has also opened novel diagnostic and therapeutic avenues for patients with various hepatobiliary diseases. The integration of "advanced endoscopy" within the practice of hepatology is nowadays referred to as "endo-hepatology". In essence, endo-hepatology consists of two pillars: one focusing primarily on disorders of the liver parenchyma, vascular disorders, and portal hypertension, which is mainly captured via EUS, while the other targets the hepatobiliary tract via endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and advanced imaging. Applications under the umbrella of endo-hepatology include, amongst others, EUS-guided liver biopsy, EUS-guided portal pressure gradient measurement, coil and glue embolisation of gastric varices as well as cholangioscopy. As such endo-hepatology could become an attractive concept wherein advanced endoscopy might reinforce the medical management of patients with hepatobiliary disorders and their complications after initial basic work-up. In this review, we discuss current trends and future developments within endo-hepatology and the remaining hurdles to overcome.

Role of endoscopy in hepatology

The growing and evolving field of EUS and advanced hepatobiliary endoscopy has amplified traditional upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and unveiled novel options for remaining unsolved hepatobiliary issues, both diagnostically and therapeutically. This conceptually appealing and fascinating integration of endoscopy within the practice of hepatology is referred to as 'endo-hepatology'. Endo-hepatology focuses on the one hand on disorders of the liver parenchyma and liver vasculature and of the hepatobiliary tract on the other hand. Applications hanging under the umbrella of endohepatology involve amongst others EUS-guided liver biopsy, EUS-guided portal pressure measurement, EUS-guided portal venous blood sampling, EUS-guided coil & glue embolization of gastric varices and spontaneous portosystemic shunts as well as ERCP in the challenging context of (decompensated cirrhosis) and intraductal cholangioscopy for primary sclerosing cholangitis. Although endoscopic proficiency however does not necessarily equal in an actual straightforward end-solution for currently persisting (complex) hepatobiliary situations. Therefore, endohepatology continues to generate high-quality data to validate and standardize procedures against currently considered (best available) "golden standards" while continuing to search and trying to provide novel minimally invasive solutions for persisting hepatological stalemate situations. In the current review, we aim to critically appraise the status and potential future directions of endo-hepatology.

Advances in Endohepatology

Over the past decade, the number of endoscopic procedures relevant to patients with liver disease not only increased but also altered and expanded in terms of indications and applications. "Endohepatology" refers to the integration of advanced endoscopy within the practice of hepatology with endoscopic ultrasound as one of the main pillars. Current applications under the umbrella of endohepatology focus on advanced diagnostics and oncological, vascular, and metabolic interventions. These involve, among others, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided liver biopsy, EUS-guided portal pressure gradient measurement, and EUS-guided coil and glue embolization of gastric varices. In addition to its conceptually attractive technical and innovative characteristics, endohepatology is also an appealing practical option for daily practice because it can be offered as a "one-stop clinic" intervention where comprehensive endoscopic diagnostic and/or therapeutic testing is performed in a single outpatient visit. In this review, we will discuss current trends and future developments within endohepatology and the remaining hurdles to overcome.

Efficacy and Technical Feasibility of Plug-Assisted Retrograde Transvenous Obliteration of Gastric Varices via Pathways Other than the Gastrorenal Shunt

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy and technical feasibility of plug-assisted retrograde transvenous obliteration of gastric varices via pathways different from the typical gastrorenal shunt.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 130 patients who underwent plug-assisted retrograde transvenous obliteration for gastric varices between 2013 and 2022. Eight patients underwent plug-assisted retrograde transvenous obliteration via different pathways. We evaluated the types of portosystemic shunts in these patients, the procedure technical and clinical success rates, and clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

In these eight patients (6 males, 2 females; mean age = 60 ± 6 years), the most common type of portosystemic shunt was a gastrocaval shunt (n = 7). Five patients had a gastrocaval shunt only; two had coexisting gastrocaval and gastrorenal shunts. One patient had a pericardiacophrenic shunt without a gastrorenal or gastrocaval shunt. The mean procedure time was 55 min. For patients with a gastrocaval shunt alone (n = 5), the mean procedure time was 40.8 min. The technical and clinical success rates were 100%. No major complication related to the procedure occurred. An initial follow-up computed tomography was performed within 2-3 weeks in all patients and revealed complete thrombosis of the gastric varices. Subsequent follow-up computed tomography (interval: 2-6 months) was performed in seven patients and showed complete disappearance of the gastric varices in all patients. During the follow-up period (range: 42 days-6.25 years), no patients experienced rebleeding or recurrence of gastric varices.

CONCLUSION

Plug-assisted retrograde transvenous obliteration via alternative portosystemic shunts is effective and technically feasible in the treatment of gastric varices.

Plug-assisted retrograde transvenous obliteration for the treatment of gastric variceal bleeding in absence of gastrorenal or gastrocaval shunt: A case report

RATINALE

Plug-assisted retrograde tansvenous obliteration (PARTO) is commonly used to treat gastric variceal bleeding. PARTO is typically performed via the gastrorenal shunt or gastrocaval shunt and there have been no reports of PARTO performed through the pericardial vein in cases of gastric varices in which there is no gastrorenal or gastrocaval shunt. Herein, we report a case of PARTO was performed to treat gastric variceal bleeding in a patient with a gastric varix without a gastrorenal or gastrocaval shunt.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 54-year-old man with alcoholic liver cirrhosis presented to the emergency room with hematemesis and melena. At presentation, the patient's blood pressure was 130/70 mm Hg and hemoglobin level was 10.1 g/dL.

DIAGNOSES

Computed tomography (CT) scan and endoscopic examination revealed a gastric varix at the gastric fundus.

INTERVENTIONS

PARTO was performed to treatment of gastric variceal bleeding via the pericardial vein.

OUTCOMES

The patient did not show any signs of variceal bleeding after the procedure, and follow-up CT at 3 weeks showed complete resolution of the gastric varix.

LESSONS

Although PARTO is technically difficult to perform through pathways other than the gastrorenal or gastrocaval shunt, it can be a beneficial alternative in cases in which other treatments fail or are not feasible.

The use of endoscopic ultrasound in the diagnosis and management of portal hypertension

The role of endoscopic ultrasound in the diagnosis and management of chronic liver disease is rapidly increasing. It forms one of the major backbones of endo-hepatology and brings us a step closer to personalized medicine. This review will focus on the particular use of EUS in the diagnosis and management of cirrhotic portal hypertension and potential complications hereof, such as ascites and gastrooesophageal varices. More specifically, EUS-guided Porto-systemic Pressure Gradient (EUS-PPG) measurement, EUS-guided coil and glue embolization of gastric varices, EUS-guided paracentesis and EUS-guided intrahepatic portosystemic shunt creation (IPSS) will be discussed in-depth with regard to clinical status, available data and technical considerations.

Balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration with lauromacrogol sclerosant foam for gastric varices

Objectives

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration (BRTO) using lauromacrogol sclerosant foam for gastric varices (GVs) with gastrorenal venous shunts.

Methods

Data of GV patients treated with BRTO using lauromacrogol sclerosant foam in 2016–2020 were retrospectively analyzed along with procedural success rate, complications, and follow-up efficacy.

Results

A total of 31 patients were treated with BRTO. The sclerosant foam was prepared by mixing iodinated oil, lauromacrogol, and air at a 1:2:3 ratio. The BRTO procedure was successfully completed in 93.5% of patients. One patient was allergic to the lauromacrogol injection. A mild postoperative fever occurred in three patients. One patient experienced grand mal seizures after the procedure. There was no significant difference in the median Child-Turcotte-Pugh scores before versus after BRTO. Complete GV resolution was observed in 93.1% of patients. One patient underwent endoscopic treatment for the development of high-risk esophageal varices. Another patient underwent transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt placement for the aggravation of ascites.

Conclusions

Lauromacrogol sclerosant foam is safe and effective in patients undergoing BRTO for GV.

Hemodynamic effect through a novel endoscopic intervention in management of varices and hypersplenism (with video)

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

We previously reported a new and combined EUS-guided intervention in a patient with portal hypertension, consisting of obliteration of varices and partial splenic embolization (PSE). Performing PSE is known to diminish the increase in portal venous pressure after endoscopic intervention for varices. The aim of this study was to use multidetector CT portal venography to evaluate the anatomy of esophagogastric varices (EGV) and the impact on hemodynamics of portosystemic collaterals shortly after the concomitant procedures.

METHODS

From October 2019 to December 2020, 5 patients with cirrhosis and with clinically significant portal hypertension who had variceal bleeding history and hypersplenism were treated with combined endoscopic obliteration for varices and EUS-guided PSE. Multidetector CT portal venography was applied to assess the anatomic drainage patterns of the EGV, diameters of feeders and drainage vessels, and splenic embolization rate.

RESULTS

Within 5 days after concomitant endoscopic interventions, we observed decreased mean diameters of the left gastric vein, short gastric vein, and azygos vein as .3 mm, 1.0 mm, and 5.2 mm compared with 3.11 mm, 7.1 mm, and 5.4 mm before the procedures, respectively. Patients showed increased white blood cells (mean count of 2.7 × 10⁹/L before vs 5.8 × 10⁹/L after) and platelets (mean count of 52.8 × 10⁹/L before vs 95.8 × 10⁹/L after). The mean splenic embolization rate was 64.5% (range, 28.8%-84.6%).

CONCLUSIONS

Our experience may illustrate an alternative technique of combining EUS-guided PSE with endoscopic therapy of varices to treat patients with portal hypertension.

Nomogram for hepatic venous pressure gradient in patients with cirrhosis

OBJECTIVE

The hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) plays an important role in the treatment and prognosis of patients with cirrhosis. Our study aimed to develop and validate a nomogram for an HVPG >12 mmHg.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed to create a nomogram for an HVPG >12 mmHg in a training cohort that was validated in another cohort. The discriminatory ability and calibration of the nomogram were tested using the C-statistic, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and calibration plots.

RESULTS

The nomogram was based on portosystemic shunts identified on computed tomography images, the etiology of cirrhosis and the Child-Pugh grade. These parameters were significantly associated with an HVPG >12 mmHg (P < 0.05 for both the training and validation cohorts). In the training cohort, the model showed good discrimination (C-statistic, AUROC, and R² of 0.71, 0.71 and 0.13, respectively) and good calibration. The total cutoff value was 112 and the sensitivity and specificity were 57.1% and 77.6%, respectively. The application of the nomogram in the validation cohort still yielded good discrimination (C-statistic 0.75 [95% confidence interval 0.61-0.89], AUROC 0.75, and R² 0.16) and good calibration.

CONCLUSIONS

This nomogram is a convenient tool for predicting an HVPG >12 mmHg in patients with cirrhosis and can help clinicians quickly identify patients with decompensated cirrhosis.

Balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration for treatment of gastric varices

Rupture of gastric varices (GVs) can be fatal. Balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration (BRTO), as known as retrograde sclerotherapy, has been widely adopted for treatment of GVs because of its effectiveness, ability to cure, and utility in emergency and prophylactic treatment. Simplifying the route of blood flow from GVs to the gastrorenal shunt is important for the successful BRTO. This review outlines BRTO indications and contraindications, describes basic BRTO procedures and modifications, compares BRTO with other GVs treatments, and discusses various combination therapies. Combined BRTO and partial splenic embolization may prevent exacerbation of esophageal varices and shows promise as a treatment option.

Combined Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Plus Variceal Obliteration versus Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Alone for the Management of Gastric Varices: Comparative Single-Center Clinical Outcomes

PURPOSE

To compare the safety and clinical outcomes of combined transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) plus variceal obliteration to those of TIPS alone for the treatment of gastric varices (GVs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A single-center, retrospective study of 40 patients with bleeding or high-risk GVs between 2008 and 2019 was performed. The patients were treated with combined therapy (n = 18) or TIPS alone (n = 22). There were no significant differences in age, sex, model for end-stage liver disease score, or GV type between the groups. The primary outcomes were the rates of GV eradication and rebleeding. The secondary outcomes included portal hypertensive complications and hepatic encephalopathy.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up period was 15.4 months for the combined therapy group and 22.9 months for the TIPS group (P = .32). After combined therapy, there was a higher rate of GV eradication (92% vs 47%, P = .01) and a trend toward a lower rate of GV rebleeding (0% vs 23%, P = .056). The estimated rebleeding rates were 0% versus 5% at 3 months, 0% versus 11% at 6 months, 0% versus 18% at 1 year, and 0% versus 38% at 2 years after combined therapy and TIPS, respectively (P = .077). There was no difference in ascites (13% vs 11%, P = .63), hepatic encephalopathy (47% vs 55%, P = .44), or esophageal variceal bleeding (0% vs 0%, P > .999) after the procedure between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The GV eradication rate is significantly higher after combined therapy, with no associated increase in portal hypertensive complications. This translates to a clinically meaningful trend toward a reduction in GV rebleeding. The value of a combined treatment strategy should be prospectively studied in a larger cohort to determine the optimal management of GVs.

Cerebral Embolism as a Rare Complication of Balloon-Occluded Retrograde Transvenous Obliteration for Gastric Varices: A Case Report

We report a case of cerebral embolism caused by balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration (BRTO) for gastric varices in a 77-year-old woman with liver cirrhosis. Balloon-occluded retrograde venography demonstrated multiple collaterals between the efferent and systemic veins, and some of them could not be embolized with metallic coils. Therefore, they were embolized with ethanol, 50% glucose solution, gelatin sponge particles, and ethanolamine oleate, and BRTO was completed. After BRTO, however, the patient complained of mild aphagia and paralysis of the right fingers, and magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated cerebral embolism. The symptoms gradually improved after the administration of ozagrel sodium and rehabilitation. The varices were also completely thrombosed. Patent foramen ovale was suspected as a cause of cerebral embolism.

Conventional versus selective balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration of gastric varices

Background

Balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration (BRTO) is a well-established interventional radiological technique for treatment of isolated gastric varices (GV). The aim of this study is to compare outcome after different BRTO techniques, i.e., conventional, selective and superselective techniques.

Fifty-nine consecutive patients underwent BRTO as a primary prophylactic treatment for GV were retrospectively categorized into group A (38 patients underwent conventional BRTO) and group B (21 patients underwent selective or superselective BRTO). Group B was sub-grouped into group B1 (11 patients underwent selective BRTO) and group B2 (10 patients underwent superselective BRTO).

Results

Median volume of ethanol amine oleate iopamidol (EOI) was significantly higher in group A than in group B2 (14.8 Vs 7.4 ml, p = 0.03). Complete GV thrombosis was significantly lower in group B2 (50%) than in A (89.5%, p = 0.01) and B1 (100%, p = 0.01). GV bleeding rate after BRTO was significantly higher in group B2 than in group A (20% vs 0%, p = 0.04). GV recurrence rate was not significantly different between group A and B (p = 0.5) or between group A, B1 and B2 (p = 0.1). Cumulative ascites exacerbation rate was significantly higher in group A than B (p = 0.005), B1 (p = 0.03), and B2 (p = 0.03). Cumulative esophageal varices (Es.V) aggravation rate was significantly higher in group A than B (p = 0.001), B1 (p = 0.01), and B2 (p = 0.03). Volume of EOI was a significant risk factor for ascites exacerbation (p = 0.008) while shunt occlusion and pre-existing partial portal vein thrombosis were significant risk factors for Es.V aggravation (p = 0.01 and 0.03, respectively).

Conclusion

Selective and super-selective techniques had a lower ascites exacerbation, and Es.V aggravation rates than conventional technique. However, superselective BRTO had a lower GV complete thrombosis and higher GV bleeding rates after BRTO than other techniques.

Plug-Assisted Retrograde Transvenous Obliteration (PARTO): Anatomical Factors Determining Procedure Outcome

PURPOSE

To study various anatomical factors determining procedure success versus failure for plug-assisted retrograde transvenous obliteration (PARTO) of gastro-lieno-renal shunt.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of 50 patients (M:F-37:13; mean age 58.4yrs) who were planned for PARTO of gastro-lieno-renal shunt from July 2017 to July 2019 was done. Anatomical factors [shunt diameter, shunt angle, shunt orientation, left renal vein (LRV) size/calibre and distance of shunt from renal vein-IVC confluence] were analysed on a pre-procedure CT. Statistical analysis of the data was done to assess the relationship between these factors and technical success/failure.

RESULTS

PARTO was successfully performed in 82% (n = 41). Analysis of anatomical factors showed that aneurysmal dilatation of the LRV, extreme acute/obtuse angulation and extreme antero-posterior orientation of the shunt in relation to the LRV was associated with higher probability of technical failure of PARTO. Minimum/maximum and entry point shunt diameter was not associated with procedure outcome. It was also noted that an increased distance of the shunt from the renal vein-IVC confluence favoured trans-jugular over trans-femoral venous access for PARTO.

CONCLUSION

Knowledge of various anatomical factors of gastro-lieno-renal shunt may help in deciding the access route for PARTO and may determine technical success/failure. Alternate methods like BRTO or coil-assisted obliteration (CARTO) or anterograde obliteration of the shunt via trans-hepatic/splenic route might be needed in such circumstances.

Management Options for Gastric Variceal Hemorrhage

Importance

Varices are one of the main clinical manifestations of cirrhosis and portal hypertension. Gastric varices are less common than esophageal varices but are often associated with poorer prognosis, mainly because of their higher propensity to bleed.

Observations

Currently, treatments used to control and manage gastric variceal bleeding include β-blockers, endoscopic injection sclerotherapy, endoscopic variceal ligation, endoscopic variceal obturation, shunt surgery, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts, balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration (BRTO), and modified BRTO. In the past few decades, Western (United States and Europe) interventional radiologists have preferred transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts that aim to decompress the liver and reduce portal pressure. Conversely, Eastern radiologists (Japan and South Korea) have preferred BRTO that directly targets the gastric varices. Over the past 20 years, BRTO has evolved and procedure-related risks have decreased. Owing to its safety and efficiency in treating gastric varices, BRTO is now starting to gain popularity among Western interventional radiologists. In this review, we present a comprehensive literature review of current and emerging management options, including BRTO and modified BRTO, for the treatment of gastric varices in the setting of cirrhosis and portal hypertension.

Conclusions and Relevance

Balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration has emerged as a safe and effective alternative treatment option for gastric variceal hemorrhage. A proper training, evidence-based consensus and guideline, thorough preprocedural and postprocedural evaluation, and a multidisciplinary team approach with BRTO and modified BRTO are strongly recommended to ensure best patient care.

Coexistence of "extra-gastric afferent-efferent direct connection" with gastric varices: CT evaluation and clinical significance

PURPOSE

To evaluate the prevalence of extra-gastric direct connection between afferent and efferent veins of gastric varices (GVs) (i.e., EAEDC) and its clinical significance during balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration (BRTO).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

57 patients who underwent BRTO for GVs obliteration were retrospectively enrolled in this study. Pre-procedural CT images were reviewed for the presence of EAEDC. Patients were categorized into group A (patients with EAEDC) and group B (Patients with no detectable EAEDC). Intraprocedural images were reviewed to see if EAEDCs could be seen and if additional techniques were used to preserve or occlude them. Post-procedural CT images were reviewed for GVs obliteration, portal/splenic vein thrombosis, EAEDC patency, and ascites exacerbation. Post-procedural esophageal varices aggravation was evaluated by upper endoscopy.

RESULTS

39 EAEDCs were identified in CT images of 35 patients (i.e., group A = 61.4%). Among them, only 20 EAEDCs were visualized during BRTO. In the remaining 22 patients, EAEDC was not identified in CT images or during BRTO (i.e., group B = 38.6%). There was no statistically significant difference between group A and B regarding post-BRTO GVs obliteration and portal/splenic vein thrombosis. Use of additional techniques to preserve EAEDC patency had significantly reduced the incidence of ascites and esophageal varices exacerbation (p = 0.036 and 0.028, respectively). In patients with EAEDC diameter ≥ 5 mm, EAEDC preservation or obliteration by coils or balloon had significantly reduced the injected sclerosant volume (p = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

CT is very useful for EAEDC detection. EAEDC preservation may decrease the incidence of post-BRTO ascites and esophageal varices exacerbation.

Evolution of Retrograde Transvenous Obliteration Techniques

Gastric variceal hemorrhage is a life-threatening complication of portal hypertension with a poorer prognosis compared with esophageal variceal hemorrhage. The presence of an infradiaphragmatic portosystemic shunt, often a gastrorenal shunt, allows for treatment with retrograde transvenous obliteration (RTO). RTO is an evolving treatment strategy, which includes balloon-assisted RTO, plug-assisted RTO, and coil-assisted RTO, for both gastric variceal hemorrhage and hepatic encephalopathy. RTO techniques are less invasive than transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt creation, with the benefit of improved hepatic function, but at the expense of increased portal pressure. This article discusses the techniques of RTO, including patient eligibility, as well as technical and clinical outcomes, including adverse events.

Modified Balloon-Occluded Retrograde Transvenous Obliteration (BRTO) Techniques for the Treatment of Gastric Varices: Vascular Plug-Assisted Retrograde Transvenous Obliteration (PARTO)/Coil-Assisted Retrograde Transvenous Obliteration (CARTO)/Balloon-Occluded Antegrade Transvenous Obliteration (BATO)

Gastric varices in the setting of portal hypertension occur less frequently than esophageal varices but occur at lower portal pressures and are associated with more massive bleeding events and higher mortality rate. Balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration (BRTO) of gastric varices has been well documented as an effective therapy for portal hypertensive gastric varices. However, BRTO requires lengthy, higher-level post-procedural monitoring and can have complications related to balloon rupture and adverse effects of sclerosing agents. Several modified BRTO techniques have been developed including vascular plug-assisted retrograde transvenous obliteration, coil-assisted retrograde transvenous obliteration, and balloon-occluded antegrade transvenous obliteration. This article provides an overview of various modified BRTO techniques.

Prevention and management of gastroesophageal varices

Bleeding from gastroesophageal varices is a serious complication in patients with liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension. Although there has been significance improvement in the prognosis of variceal bleeding with advancement in diagnostic and therapeutic modalities for its management, mortality rate still remains high. Therefore, appropriate prevention and rapid, effective management of bleeding from gastroesophageal varices is very important. Recently, various studies about management of gastoesophageal varices, including prevention of development and aggravation of varices, prevention of first variceal bleeding, management of acute variceal bleeding, and prevention of variceal rebleeding, have been published. The present article reviews published articles and practice guidelines to present the most optimal management of patients with gastroesophageal varices.

Balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration of varices: focusing on the portal hemodynamics and the recent techniques

PURPOSE

To evaluate the recent topics of Ballloon-occluded retrograde trasnvenous obliteration(B-RTO).

METHOD

We overviewed the recent scientific papers regarding B-RTO.

RESULT

B-RTO is a treatment method for occluding varices retrogradely using a sclerosing agent under balloon occlusion of a major draining vein. It has been recognized as an effective treatment method for gastric varices. Hepatic function reserve is improved and liver volume is increased after B-RTO. In recent years, various technical options, such as plug-assisted retrograde transvenous obliteration, coil-assisted retrograde transvenous obliteration, or foam B-RTO, have also been reported. In performing B-RTO, portal hemodynamics must be thoroughly examined radiologically. Judging the classification of the grade of collateral venous hemodynamics is important to select the appropriate embolization technique of B-RTO and to successfully occlude varices. Finally, the word "portosystemic shunt syndrome" has been proposed and the condition should be considered while selecting a treatment for gastric varices.

CONCLUSION

B-RTO is effective for gastrointestinal varices and portosystemic shunts.

Probiotics for Gastrointestinal Conditions: A Summary of the Evidence

Probiotics contain microorganisms, most of which are bacteria similar to the beneficial bacteria that occur naturally in the human gut. Probiotics have been widely studied in a variety of gastrointestinal diseases. The most-studied species include Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, and Saccharomyces. However, a lack of clear guidelines on when to use probiotics and the most effective probiotic for different gastrointestinal conditions may be confusing for family physicians and their patients. Probiotics have an important role in the maintenance of immunologic equilibrium in the gastrointestinal tract through the direct interaction with immune cells. Probiotic effectiveness can be species-, dose-, and disease-specific, and the duration of therapy depends on the clinical indication. There is high-quality evidence that probiotics are effective for acute infectious diarrhea, antibiotic-associated diarrhea, Clostridium difficile- associated diarrhea, hepatic encephalopathy, ulcerative colitis, irritable bowel syndrome, functional gastrointestinal disorders, and necrotizing enterocolitis. Conversely, there is evidence that probiotics are not effective for acute pancreatitis and Crohn disease. Probiotics are safe for infants, children, adults, and older patients, but caution is advised in immunologically vulnerable populations.

Gastrointestinal Issues in Liver Disease

Gastrointestinal (GI) complications of cirrhosis are frequent in patients who require intensive care support and are often the primary indication for intensive care unit (ICU) admission. Perhaps the most worrisome GI complication for the intensivist is variceal hemorrhage. Bleeding from esophageal or gastric varices represents a life-threatening event for cirrhotic patients and provides management challenges for the ICU team. Nonvariceal GI bleeding, impaired GI motility, and malnutrition also provide significant challenges for the intensivist. This article reviews GI issues that present in critically ill cirrhotic patients and their management in the acute setting.

Balloon occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration for bleeding gastric varices: Eyes see what the mind knows

Approximately one in six patients with portal hypertension who develop varices at sites of portosystemic venous collaterals has gastric varices due to hepatofugal flow into the gastric veins. Bleeding from gastric varices, though less common, has a higher mortality and morbidity compared to bleeding esophageal varices, which are easier to manage endoscopically. The efferent channel for gastric varices is mostly the gastrorenal shunt (GRS) which opens into the left renal vein. Balloon-occluded transvenous obliteration (BRTO) involves accessing the GRS with an aim to temporarily occlude its outflow using a balloon catheter and at the same time injecting sclerosant mixture within the varix so as to cause its thrombosis and thereby obliteration. BRTO is one of the mainstays of minimally invasive treatment for bleeding gastric varices. In the minority of cases where the GRS is absent, conventional BRTO is technically not possible. However, accessing the small alternate shunt from the inferior phrenic vein may be possible if one is aware of its existence.

A Comprehensive Review of Portosystemic Collaterals in Cirrhosis: Historical Aspects, Anatomy, and Classifications

Portosystemic collateral formation in cirrhosis plays an important part in events that define the natural history in affected patients. A detailed understanding of collateral anatomy and hemodynamics in cirrhotics is essential to envisage diagnosis, management, and outcomes of portal hypertension. In this review, we provide detailed insights into the historical, anatomical, and hemodynamic aspects to portal hypertension and collateral pathways in cirrhosis with emphasis on the various classification systems.

Percutaneous transhepatic obliteration and percutaneous transhepatic sclerotherapy for intractable hepatic encephalopathy and gastric varices improves the hepatic function reserve

Percutaneous transhepatic obliteration (PTO) and percutaneous transhepatic sclerotherapy (PTS) are widely performed as an emergency measure in cases of variceal hemorrhage and intractable hepatic encephalopathy. The PTO/PTS technique is capable of directly blocking the blood supply in cases in which balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration (B-RTO) is not effective, or in cases with complicated collateral flow. Although PTO/PTS is not currently the first choice due to the invasiveness of transhepatic puncture, this procedure can modify the blood flow in an antegrade manner. The present study examined the changes in hepatic function reserve following PTO/PTS for intractable hepatic encephalopathy and/or gastric varices. In total, the study included 37 patients (mean age, 61.75±12.77 years; age range, 32-88 years; male to female ratio, 23:14) with a variety of gastrorenal shunts, or B-RTO-intractable hepatic encephalopathy and gastric varices without gastrorenal shunts. The patients underwent PTO/PTS by embolizing a microcoil or injection of a sclerosing agent (5% ethanolamine oleate iopamidol). Alterations in hepatic function reserve prior to and following the procedure were compared. The patients were treated for hepatic encephalopathy in 11 patients, gastric varices in 19 patients, and both conditions in 7 patients. The results indicated that the blood ammonia level improved from 135.76±75.23 mg/dl to 88.00±42.16 and 61.81±33.75 mg/dl at 3 and 6 months after therapy, respectively. In addition, the Child-Pugh score improved from 8.48±2.01 prior to therapy to 7.70±1.84 and 7.22±2.01 at 3 and 6 months after the procedure, respectively. Although there was a concern that PTO/PTS may cause complications due to an increase in portal venous pressure (PVP) arising from shunt occlusion, no severe complications were observed. In conclusion, for patients with various gastrorenal shunts or those with B-RTO-intractable hepatic encephalopathy and gastric varices without gastrorenal shunts, PTO/PTS can improve the antegrade blood flow to the liver, as demonstrated by improvement in the hepatic function reserve.

Comparison of Balloon-Occluded Retrograde Transvenous Obliteration (BRTO) Using Ethanolamine Oleate (EO), BRTO Using Sodium Tetradecyl Sulfate (STS) Foam and Vascular Plug-Assisted Retrograde Transvenous Obliteration (PARTO)

PURPOSE

To compare the clinical outcomes of balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration (BRTO) using ethanolamine oleate (EO), BRTO using sodium tetradecyl sulfate (STS) foam, and vascular plug-assisted retrograde transvenous obliteration (PARTO).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From April 2004 to February 2015, ninety-five patients underwent retrograde transvenous obliteration for gastric varices were analyzed retrospectively. BRTO with EO was performed in 49 patients, BRTO with STS foam in 25, and PARTO in 21. Among them, we obtained follow-up data in 70 patients. Recurrence of gastric varices was evaluated by follow-up endoscopy or CT. Medical records were reviewed for the clinical efficacy. Statistical analyses were performed by Kaplan-Meier method, Chi-square, Fisher's, and Kruskal-Wallis tests.

RESULTS

Technical and clinical success was 94.7 %. As major complications, a hemoglobinuria and a death due to disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) were occurred in two patients with BRTO using EO. Recurrence occurred more frequently in PARTO group (P < 0.05). Recurrence occurred in three patients in BRTO using EO group and four patients in PARTO group with 3.2 and 32.8 % of each expected 1-year recurrence rates. There was no recurrence in BRTO using STS group. Abdominal pain occurred more frequently in BRTO using EO than BRTO using STS foam and PARTO (P < 0.05). Procedure time of PARTO was shorter than two conventional BRTOs (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

BRTO using STS foam or PARTO is better than BRTO using EO for treatment of gastric varices in terms of complication or procedure time. However, PARTO showed frequent recurrence of gastric varices during the long-term follow-up rather than BRTO.

Spectrum of hepatofugal collateral pathways in portal hypertension: an illustrated radiological review

The purpose of this article is to describe the various portosystemic collateral pathways pertinent to portal hypertension on multi-detector row computed tomography (MDCT) and their clinical relevance, with special emphasis on the uncommon ones. The knowledge and understanding of the various patterns of portosystemic collateral channels has important implications both for the clinician and the interventionist. MDCT with its advanced post processing capabilities can exquisitely demonstrate these vascular pathways to help in therapeutic decision making.

Teaching points

• Portosystemic collaterals are an important cause of bleeding and hepatic encephalopathy.

• Radiologists should be familiar with the imaging findings to effectively identify them.

• Pre-operative knowledge of portosystemic collaterals is essential to avoid inadvertent vascular injury.

Balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration of gastric varix with multiple drainage veins performed with temporal occlusion of the pericardiacophrenic vein with a micro-balloon

We encountered a case with a gastric varix that drained into the gastro-renal shunt, left pericardiacophrenic vein, and several other dilated collateral veins. This patient had a circumaortic venous ring. For this case we successfully performed balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration in which sclerotic agents were infused from the balloon catheter advanced to the left pre-aortic renal vein and the tip was wedged into the end of the gastro-renal shunt. Before injection of sclerotic agents, collateral veins other than the left pericardiacophrenic vein were embolized with micro-coils. During the injection, the left pericardiacophrenic vein was occluded temporarily with a micro-balloon catheter coaxially advanced from the catheter inserted from the femoral vein to the left pericardiacophrenic vein through the left brachiocephalic vein.

Endoscopic cyanoacrylate injection for the treatment of gastric varices in children

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate in treating acute bleeding of gastric varices in children.

METHODS: The retrospective study included 21 children with 47 episodes of active gastric variceal bleeding who were treated by endoscopic injection of N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate at Asan Medical Center Children’s Hospital between August 2004 and December 2011. To reduce the risk of embolism, each injection consisted of 0.1-0.5 mL of 0.5 mL N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate diluted with 0.5 or 0.8 mL Lipiodol. The primary outcome was incidence of hemostasis after variceal obliteration and the secondary outcome was complication of the procedure.

RESULTS: The 21 patients experienced 47 episodes of active gastric variceal bleeding, including rebleeding, for which they received a total of 52 cyanoacrylate injections. Following 42 bleeding episodes, hemostasis was achieved after one injection and following five bleeding episodes it was achieved after two injections. The mean volume of each single aliquot of cyanoacrylate injected was 0.3 ± 0.1 mL (range: 0.1-0.5 mL). Injection achieved hemostasis in 45 of 47 (95.7%) episodes of acute gastric variceal bleeding. Eleven patients (52.4%) developed rebleeding events, with the mean duration of hemostasis being 11.1 ± 11.6 mo (range: 1.0-39.2 mo). No treatment-related complications such as distal embolism were noted with the exception of abdominal pain in one patient (4.8%). Among four mortalities, one patient died of variceal rebleeding.

CONCLUSION: Endoscopic variceal obliteration using a small volume of aliquots with repeated cyanoacrylate injection was an effective and safe option for the treatment of gastric varices in children.

Nonendoscopic management strategies for acute esophagogastric variceal bleeding

Acute variceal bleeding is a potentially life-threatening complication of portal hypertension. Management consists of emergent hemostasis, therapy directed at hemodynamic resuscitation, protection of the airway, and prevention and treatment of complications including prophylactic use of antibiotics. Endoscopic treatment remains the mainstay in the management of acute variceal bleeding in combination with pharmacotherapy aimed at reducing portal pressure. This article intends to highlight only the current nonendoscopic treatment approaches for control of acute variceal bleeding.

Endovascular management of gastric varices

Bleeding from gastric varices is a major complication of portal hypertension. Although less common than bleeding associated with esophageal varices, gastric variceal bleeding has a higher mortality. From an endovascular perspective,transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) to decompress the portal circulation and/or balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration (BRTO) are utilized to address bleeding gastric varices. Until recently, there was a clear medical cultural divide between the strategy of decompressing the portal circulation (TIPS creation, for example) and transvenous obliteration for the management of gastric varices. However, the practice of BRTO is gaining acceptance in the United States and its practice is spreading rapidly. Recently, the American College of Radiology has identified BRTO to be a viable alternative to TIPS in particular anatomical and clinical scenarios. However, the anatomical and clinical applications of BRTO were not defined beyond the conservative approach of resorting to BRTO in non-TIPS candidates. The article discusses the outcomes of BRTO and TIPS for the management of gastric varices individually or in combination. Definitions, endovascular technical concepts and contemporary vascular classifications of gastric variceal systems are described in order to help grasp the complexity of the hemodynamic pathology and hopefully help define the pathology better for future reporting and lay the ground for more defined stratification of patients not only based on comorbidity and hepatic reserve but on anatomy and hemodynamic classifications.

Portopulmonary venous anastomosis in balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration for the treatment of gastric varices

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Several reports have described portopulmonary venous anastomosis (PPVA). However, in balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration (BRTO), attention has not been paid to paradoxical embolism. The objective of this study was to investigate the existence of a right-left shunt due to PPVA when the drainage vein is occluded by a balloon during BRTO.

METHODS

The subjects were 19 patients who underwent BRTO. Whether PPVA was present was confirmed on balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous venography (BRTV). After BRTV, a retrograde bolus injection of 20 mL of carbon dioxide (CO2 ) via the balloon catheter was performed under balloon occlusion, and the flow of bubbles into both ventricles was observed with four-chamber view echocardiography. During the same balloon occlusion, bolus injection of CO2 into the inferior vena cava was performed, followed by echocardiography.

RESULTS

PPVA was confirmed on BRTV in four patients (21.1%). On echocardiography with retrograde CO2 injection, bubbles were confirmed in the left ventricle in six patients (31.6%). On echocardiography with CO2 injection into the inferior vena cava, bubbles were not confirmed in the left ventricle in any cases.

CONCLUSIONS

When the draining vein was occluded with a balloon and blood flow in a gastrorenal or gastrocaval shunt was stopped during BRTO, PPVA was confirmed in 21.1% of cases on retrograde angiography, and a right-left shunt was confirmed in 31.6% of cases on echocardiography.

Management of gastric varices

According to their location, gastric varices (GV) are classified as gastroesophageal varices and isolated gastric varices. This review will mainly focus on those GV located in the fundus of the stomach (isolated gastric varices 1 and gastroesophageal varices 2). The 1-year risk of GV bleeding has been reported to be around 10%-16%. Size of GV, presence of red signs, and the degree of liver dysfunction are independent predictors of bleeding. Limited data suggest that tissue adhesives, mainly cyanoacrylate (CA), may be effective and better than propranolol in preventing bleeding from GV. General management of acute GV bleeding must be similar to that of esophageal variceal bleeding, including prophylactic antibiotics, a careful replacement of volemia, and early administration of vasoactive drugs. Small sample-sized randomized controlled trials have shown that tissue adhesives are the therapy of choice for acute GV bleeding. In treatment failures, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is considered the treatment of choice. After initial hemostasis, repeated sessions with CA injections along with nonselective beta-blockers are recommended as secondary prophylaxis; whether CA is superior to TIPS in this scenario is not completely clear. Balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration (BRTO) has been introduced as a new method to treat GV. BRTO is also effective and has the potential benefit of increasing portal hepatic blood flow and therefore may be an alternative for patients who may not tolerate TIPS. However, BRTO obliterates spontaneous portosystemic shunts, potentially aggravating portal hypertension and its related complications. The role of BRTO in the management of acute GV bleeding is promising but merits further evaluation.

Gastric and ectopic varices

Although often considered together, gastric and ectopic varices represent complications of a heterogeneous group of underlying diseases. Commonly, these are known to arise in patients with cirrhosis secondary to portal hypertension; however, they also arise in patients with noncirrhotic portal hypertension, most often secondary to venous thrombosis of the portal venous system. One of the key initial assessments is to define the underlying condition leading to the formation of these portal-collateral pathways to guide management. In the authors' experience, these patients can be grouped into distinct although sometimes overlapping conditions, which can provide a helpful conceptual basis of management.

Thrombocytopenia in Patients with Gastric Varices and the Effect of Balloon-occluded Retrograde Transvenous Obliteration on the Platelet Count

OBJECTIVES

Gastric varices primarily occur in cirrhotic patients with portal hypertension and splenomegaly and thus are probably associated with thrombocytopenia. However, the prevalence and severity of thrombocytopenia are unknown in this clinical setting. Moreover, one-third of patients after balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration (BRTO) have aggravated splenomegaly, which potentially may cause worsening thrombocytopenia. The aim of the study is to determine the prevalence and degree of thrombocytopenia in patients with gastric varices associated with gastrorenal shunts undergoing BRTO, to determine the prognostic factors of survival after BRTO (platelet count included), and to assess the effect of BRTO on platelet count over a 1-year period.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective review of 35 patients who underwent BRTO (March 2008-August 2011). Pre- and post-BRTO platelet counts were noted. Potential predictors of bleeding and survival (age, gender, liver disease etiology, platelet count, model for end stage liver disease [MELD]-score, presence of ascites or hepatocellular carcinoma) were analyzed (multivariate analysis). A total of 91% (n = 32/35) of patients had thrombocytopenia (<150,000 platelet/cm(3)) pre-BRTO. Platelet counts at within 48-h, within 2 weeks and at 30-60 days intervals (up to 6 months) after BRTO were compared with the baseline pre-BRTO values.

RESULTS

35 Patients with adequate platelet follow-up were found. A total of 92% and 17% of patients had a platelet count of <150,000/cm(3) and <50,000/cm(3), respectively. There was a trend for transient worsening of thrombocytopenia immediately (<48 h) after BRTO, however, this was not statistically significant. Platelet count was not a predictor of post-BRTO rebleeding or patient survival. However, MELD-score, albumin, international normalized ratio (INR), and etiology were predictors of rebleeding.

CONCLUSION

Thrombocytopenia is very common (>90% of patients) in patients undergoing BRTO. However, BRTO (with occlusion of the gastrorenal shunt) has little effect on the platelet count. Long-term outcomes of BRTO for bleeding gastric varices using sodium tetradecyl sulfate in the USA are impressive with a 4-year variceal rebleed rate and transplant-free survival rate of 9% and 76%, respectively. Platelet count is not a predictor of higher rebleeding or patient survival after BRTO.

Vascular anatomy and the morphologic and hemodynamic classifications of gastric varices and spontaneous portosystemic shunts relevant to the BRTO procedure

The pathologic anatomy and hemodynamics of the left-sided portal circulation that is associated with gastric varices (GVs) are complex and highly variable. Understanding the pathologic anatomy and hemodynamics associated with GVs is important for clinical management decisions and for the technical descriptive details of the balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration (BRTO) and balloon-occluded antegrade transvenous obliteration procedures. A reflection of the considerable variability in anatomy, pathology, and hemodynamics is the numerous descriptive and categorical classifications that have been described in the past 2 decades. This article reviews the detailed descriptive gross anatomy, radiographic anatomy, and portosystemic venous hemodynamics that are associated with GVs and that can be encountered during the BRTO or balloon-occluded antegrade transvenous obliteration procedure(s) or both. Definitions are also set to clarify this detailed anatomy that received limited description in the prior literature. Moreover, all the classifications that have been described (to the best of the author's knowledge) that are relevant to the BRTO procedure are detailed in the article.

Balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration using a microballoon catheter for intractable gastric fundal varices

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration (B-RTO) is recognized as the standard therapy for patients with gastric fundal varices in Japan; however, the procedure is difficult when drainage veins other than the gastrorenal shunt developed. The efficacy and safety of B-RTO using a microballoon catheter for such patients were evaluated.

METHODS

The subjects were 99 patients with gastric fundal varices who fulfilled the criteria for receiving endoscopic and/or interventional therapies. Among these, 95 patients underwent B-RTO. Of the 95 patients, 14 were treated with the use of microballoon catheters, including nine in whom the left inferior phrenic vein was found as a secondary drainage vein in addition to the gastrorenal shunt, and five in whom a gastrorenal shunt was absent. The B-RTO procedure performed using a microballoon catheter inserted through the left inferior phrenic vein in 13 patients, and through the pericardiophrenic vein in one patient.

RESULTS

The B-RTO procedure using microballoon catheters was successful in 13 of the 14 patients (93%), while in the remaining one patient, multiple drainage veins were visualized on venography. Complete obliteration of the varices was achieved in all the 13 patients by injection of 5% ethanolamine oleate iopamidol at a median volume of 25 mL (range, 11 to 40 mL) through the catheters. None of the patients showed injuries of the drainage veins or any systemic complications.

CONCLUSIONS

B-RTO using a microballoon catheter is useful for the treatment of gastric fundal varices in which drainage veins other than the gastrorenal shunt developed.

Balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration of gastric varices

Balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration (BRTO) of gastric varices is an image-guided transcatheter procedure used to treat gastric varices with sclerosants rather than decompression of the portal venous system. The history of its development, relevant portal venous, and systemic venous anatomic considerations, techniques, indications, and early results will be reviewed. In addition, the status of the practice of BRTO in the United States will be discussed.

Protective value of TIPS against the development of hydrothorax/ascites and upper gastrointestinal bleeding after balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration (BRTO)

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to evaluate the incidence of post-balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration (BRTO) ascites/hepatic hydrothorax and rebleeding rate (variceal and non-variceal) in the presence and absence of a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS).

METHODS

A retrospective audit of consecutive patients undergoing BRTO was performed (August 2007-October 2010). The population was divided into two groups: patients who underwent BRTO only (BRTO-only group) and those who underwent BRTO in the presence of TIPS (BRTO+TIPS group). Post-BRTO rebleeding was categorized for the source of bleeding. Ascites and/or hepatic hydrothorax were categorized according to clinical severity. Comparisons, utilizing the Kaplan-Meier method, between both groups were made for patient survival, incidence of ascites/hydrothorax, and rebleeding.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine patients underwent BRTO (three technical failures of BRTO-only group). Of the 36 technically successful BRTO procedures, 27 patients (75%) underwent BRTO-only and 9 patients (25%) underwent BRTO in the presence of a TIPS. Pre-BRTO ascites/hydrothorax resolved in BRTO-only vs. BRTO+TIPS in 7% (N=2/27) and 56% (N=5/9), respectively (P=0.006). The ascites/hydrothorax free rate at 6, 12, and 24 months after BRTO for BRTO-only vs. BRTO+TIPS was 58%, 43%, 29%, and 100%, 100%, 100%, respectively (P=0.01). Recurrent hemorrhage for BRTO-only vs. BRTO+TIPS groups, and for the same time periods was 9%, 9%, 21% vs. 0%, 0%, 0%, respectively (P=0.03). The 1-year patient survival of both groups (80-88%) was similar (P>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

This study concludes that the presence of TIPS has a protective value against the development of post-BRTO ascites/hydrothorax as well as recurrent hemorrhage but this does not translate to improved patient survival.