Recognizing and interpreting artifacts and pitfalls in MR imaging of the breast

Recognizing patient-related artefacts in MRI of the breasts: principles, imaging appearance, and solutions to minimize them

Breast MRI has emerged as an increasingly important tool in evaluating breast pathologies including detection and assessment of cancers, evaluation of implant integrity and as a problem-solving tool for inconclusive conventional breast imaging findings. MRI artefacts encountered during image interpretation may create diagnostic dilemmas. Many of these artefacts are patient-related and can be avoidable. Identification of these artefacts can be challenging in daily practice in particular to trainees or inexperienced radiologists. This article illustrates the principles and imaging appearance of the common patient-related artefacts in breast MRI, with discussion on how to minimize them. They include positioning-related artefacts, inhomogeneous fat suppression, susceptibility artefacts including those associated with the newly emerged non-radioactive wireless localization devices and superparamagnetic lymphatic tracer, as well as motion artefacts. Familiarization with these 4 major types of artefacts by radiologists is crucial in troubleshooting and achieving accurate image interpretation.

Does the presence of Magtrace preclude adaptive breast radiotherapy on an MR-Linac?

INTRODUCTION

This work reports on an unusual finding observed during image quality assessment in the preparation for the clinical implementation of breast magnetic resonance image-guided radiotherapy (MRIgRT) on a 1.5 Tesla (T) magnetic resonance linear accelerator (MR-Linac) (Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden).

CASE AND OUTCOMES

A patient with T2 N0 M0 right breast invasive ductal carcinoma, receiving adjuvant radiotherapy, underwent two imaging sessions on the MR-Linac. The imaging protocol included T1- and T2-weighted (W) turbo spin echo (TSE) sequences, a T1W mDixon, and a T2W TSE navigated sequence acquired on end-expiration. All images were reconstructed in the axial plane. Images were assessed for image quality and appropriateness for use within the treatment pathway using visual grading analysis (VGA). An artefact in the right breast was noted independently by all observers. The patient's skin and medical notes were reviewed for possible explanation. The findings were discussed with the patient's responsible clinician, and subsequent referral to the local multi-disciplinary team (MDT) for radiologist review was made. On further investigation, the patient's images demonstrated a signal void in the subareolar region of the right breast coinciding with the surgical site. This was distal from the tumour bed and deemed unlikely to be related to a Magseed marker or intraoperative clips. The patient reported no history of nipple tattoo or piercing. There was nothing on clothing that this could be attributed to.

DISCUSSION

Following MDT review, where all potential sources of signal void were considered, it was concluded that the cause was Magtrace, a superparamagnetic iron oxide tracer, recommended for sentinel lymph node localisation in patients with breast cancer in the United Kingdom. The artefact was characteristic of a magnetic susceptibility artefact. These can arise from local magnetic field inhomogeneities caused by the presence of the metal compounds in MagTrace. For breast MRIgRT on the MR-Linac, treatment verification and the possibility of real-time replanning is a critical aspect. The magnetic susceptibility artefact significantly inhibited plan adaption and confidence in the online image registration process making the patient ineligible for treatment on the MR-Linac.

CONCLUSION

As part of ongoing work-up for breast MRIgRT, the screening of patients for Magtrace is now included. Optimisation of MR imaging sequences for radiotherapy planning and image review to minimise distortion are being developed.

Prevalence and influencing factors for artifact development in breast MRI-derived maximum intensity projections

BACKGROUND

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides high diagnostic sensitivity for breast cancer. However, MRI artifacts may impede the diagnostic assessment. This is particularly important when evaluating maximum intensity projections (MIPs), such as in abbreviated MRI (AB-MRI) protocols, because high image quality is desired as a result of fewer sequences being available to compensate for problems.

PURPOSE

To describe the prevalence of artifacts on dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) MRI-derived MIPs and to investigate potentially associated attributes.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

For this institutional review board approved retrospective analysis, MIPs were generated from subtraction series and cropped to represent the left and right breasts as regions of interest. These images were labeled by three independent raters regarding the presence of MRI artifacts. MRI artifact prevalence and associations with patient characteristics and technical attributes were analyzed using descriptive statistics and generalized linear models (GLMMs).

RESULTS

The study included 2524 examinations from 1794 patients (median age 50 years), performed on 1.5 and 3.0 Tesla MRI systems. Overall inter-rater agreement was kappa = 0.54. Prevalence of significant unilateral artifacts was 29.2% (736/2524), whereas bilateral artifacts were present in 37.8% (953/2524) of all examinations. According to the GLMM, artifacts were significantly positive associated with age (odds ratio [OR] = 1.52) and magnetic field strength (OR = 1.55), whereas a negative effect could be shown for body mass index (OR = 0.95).

CONCLUSION

MRI artifacts on DCE subtraction MIPs of the breast, as used in AB-MRI, are a relevant topic. Our results show that, besides the magnetic field strength, further associated attributes are patient age and body mass index, which can provide possible targets for artifact reduction.

Preparation of MnO2@poly-(DMAEMA-co-IA)-conjugated methotrexate nano-complex for MRI and radiotherapy of breast cancer application

OBJECTIVE

A novel efficient pH-sensitive targeted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contrast agent and innovative radio-sensitizing system were synthesized based on MnO2 NPs coated with biocompatible poly-dimethyl-amino-ethyl methacrylate-Co-itaconic acid, (DMAEMA-Co-IA) and targeted with methotrexate (MTX).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The as-established NPs were fully characterized and evaluated for MRI signal enhancement, relaxivity, in vitro cell targeting, cell toxicity, blood compatibility, and radiotherapy (RT) efficacy.

RESULTS

The targeted NPs MnO2@Poly(DMAEMA-Co-IA) and MTX-loaded NPs inhibited MCF-7 cell viability more effectively than free MTX after 24 and 48 h, respectively, with no noticeable toxicity. Additionally, the insignificant hemolytic activity demonstrated their proper hemo-compatibility. T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging was used to distinguish the differential uptake of the produced MnO2@Poly(DMAEMA-Co-IA)-MTX NPs in malignant cells compared to normal ones in the presence of high and low MTX receptor cells (MCF-7 and MCF-10A, respectively). In MRI, the produced theranostic NPs displayed pH-responsive contrast enhancement. As shown by in vitro assays, treatment of cells with MnO2@Poly(DMAEMA-Co-IA)-MTX NPs prior to radiotherapy in hypoxic conditions significantly enhanced therapeutic efficacy.

CONCLUSION

We draw the conclusion that using MnO2@Poly(DMAEMA-Co-IA)-MTX NPs in MR imaging and combination radiotherapy may be a successful method for imaging and radiation therapy of hypoxia cells.

Clinical evaluation of cylindrical regional suppression in dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI: An intra-individual comparison study on image quality and lesion conspicuity

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effect of a cylindrical regional-suppression technique (CREST) on image quality and lesion conspicuity in dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) of the breast.

METHOD

This was a comparative study of 67 women with 44 lesions who underwent breast DCE-MRI with CREST (CREST-DCE) and had a previous DCE-MRI without CREST (conv-DCE) available. Two radiologists assessed image quality parameters and lesion conspicuity using five-point Likert scales. In an intra-individual comparison, the effects of CREST on image quality (strong degradation to strong improvement) were assessed. Moreover, both radiologists identified the post-contrast phase, which benefited the most from using CREST in direct comparison. The statistical analysis included the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

RESULTS

Cardiac motion-rated artefacts were significantly reduced in CREST-DCE compared to conv-DCE (3.6 ± 1.2 [CREST-DCE] vs 2.1 ± 0.8 [conv-DCE], p < 0.001). At the axilla, the visualisation of anatomical structures (3.9 ± 1.0 vs 2.3 ± 1.2, p < 0.001) and the skin contour (4.3 ± 0.8 vs 3.0 ± 1.1, p < 0.001) were significantly improved in CREST-DCE, whereas ghosting artefacts were significantly less pronounced (3.8 ± 1.1 vs 2.4 ± 1.0, p < 0.001). The parasternal region was similarly assessable using both techniques (4.3 ± 1.1 vs 4.2 ± 1.2, p = 0.47). In direct comparison, CREST-DCE images were classified as "improved" in 54/67 and "equivalent" in 13/67 exams. The effects of CREST were found to be most pronounced in the very early post-contrast phase (32/67). The lesion conspicuity was rated similar for CREST and conv-DCE (4.7 ± 0.7 vs 4.8 ± 0.2, p = 0.18).

CONCLUSIONS

CREST appears to be an effective tool to reduce cardiac motion-related artefacts and, therefore, may improve image quality in breast DCE-MRI without impairing lesion conspicuity.

Side of contrast injection and breast size correlate with motion artifacts grade and image quality on breast MRI

BACKGROUND

Motion is a relevant cause of artifacts in breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), potentially degrading image quality, even with optimized protocols.

PURPOSE

To investigate the causes of motion artifacts (MA) impacting on image quality (IQ) of contrast-enhanced breast MRI.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Retrospective two-center study on consecutive 1.5-T contrast-enhanced breast MRI, independently reviewed by two radiologists on first subtracted and maximum intensity projection images to define the side most affected by MA. IQ was scored as 1 (optimal), 2 (reduced, but without reduction of diagnostic power), or 3 (reduced, with reduced diagnostic power). Correlations with injection side, breast size (A/B vs. C/D cups), patient age, clinical indication, and MRI scanner/protocol were assessed using χ² and Fisher's exact statistics.

RESULTS

In total, 237 examinations were included, with right injection performed in 124 (52%) and left in 113 (48%). MA were more frequent on the side ipsilateral to the injection (144/237, 61%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 54-67%) than on the contralateral (93/237, 95% CI 33-46%) (P < 0.001); IQ was scored 1 in 154/237 (65%), 2 in 63/237 (27%), and 3 in 20/237 (8%) examinations; patients with A/B cups showed higher IQ score than patients with C/D cups (scores 1, 2, and 3: 54% vs. 70%; 29% vs. 25%; 17% vs. 5%, respectively, P = 0.002). No significant correlations were found for MA (P≥0.106) or IQ (P ≥ 0.318) between ipsi- or contralateral injection and right/left injection, breast size, age, indication, or scanner/protocol.

CONCLUSION

MA were more frequent in breasts ipsilateral to contrast injection and showed a reduced IQ for small breasts.

Contrast mammography in clinical practice: Current uses and potential diagnostic dilemmas

OBJECTIVE

This article will discuss the indications for Contrast Enhanced Spectral Mammography (CESM) with a focus on imaging interpretation including diagnostic dilemmas and pitfalls which may be encountered in practice.

CONCLUSION

Understanding potential diagnostic dilemmas and pitfalls of CESM allows for enhanced interpretation. The clinical utilization of Contrast Enhanced Spectral Mammography (CESM) has increased significantly over the last few years. CESM demonstrates comparable sensitivity and accuracy to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the evaluation of breast cancer but is less time consuming and less expensive. Because of this, CESM is now being used in lieu of MRI for many diagnostic indicators including the evaluation of abnormal mammographic findings, extent of disease, and response to neoadjuvant therapy. Additionally, ongoing research into the role of CESM in asymptomatic screening for breast cancer is evolving. As this technique becomes more popular, focusing on appropriate technique and interpretation is important. This article reviews the current and potential roles of CESM. It provides examples of CESM utilized for diagnostic indications while highlighting diagnostic dilemmas, pitfalls, and artifacts that may be encountered when interpreting CESM images.

Deformable Registration for Longitudinal Breast MRI Screening

MRI screening of high-risk patients for breast cancer provides very high sensitivity, but with a high recall rate and negative biopsies. Comparing the current exam to prior exams reduces the number of follow-up procedures requested by radiologists. Such comparison, however, can be challenging due to the highly deformable nature of breast tissues. Automated co-registration of multiple scans has the potential to aid diagnosis by providing 3D images for side-by-side comparison and also for use in CAD systems. Although many deformable registration techniques exist, they generally have a large number of parameters that need to be optimized and validated for each new application. Here, we propose a framework for such optimization and also identify the optimal input parameter set for registration of 3D T₁-weighted MRI of breast using Elastix, a widely used and freely available registration tool. A numerical simulation study was first conducted to model the breast tissue and its deformation through finite element (FE) modeling. This model generated the ground truth for evaluating the registration accuracy by providing the deformation of each voxel in the breast volume. An exhaustive search was performed over various values of 7 registration parameters (4050 different combinations of parameters were assessed) and the optimum parameter set was determined. This study showed that there was a large variation in the registration accuracy of different parameter sets ranging from 0.29 mm to 2.50 mm in median registration error and 3.71 mm to 8.90 mm in 95 percentile of the registration error. Mean registration errors of 0.32 mm, 0.29 mm, and 0.30 mm and 95 percentile errors of 3.71 mm, 5.02 mm, and 4.70 mm were obtained by the three best parameter sets. The optimal parameter set was applied to consecutive breast MRI scans of 13 patients. A radiologist identified 113 landmark pairs (~ 11 per patient) which were used to assess registration accuracy. The results demonstrated that using the optimal registration parameter set, a registration accuracy (in mm) of 3.4 [1.8 6.8] was achieved.

Motion artifacts, lesion type, and parenchymal enhancement in breast MRI: what does really influence diagnostic accuracy?

BACKGROUND

Motion artifacts can reduce image quality of breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). There is a lack of data regarding their effect on diagnostic estimates.

PURPOSE

To evaluate factors that potentially influence readers' diagnostic estimates in breast MRI: motion artifacts; amount of fibroglandular tissue; background parenchymal enhancement; lesion size; and lesion type.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This Institutional Review Board-approved, retrospective, cross-sectional, single-center study included 320 patients (mean age = 55.1 years) with 334 histologically verified breast lesions (139 benign, 195 malignant) who underwent breast MRI. Two expert breast radiologists evaluated the images considering: motion artifacts (1 = minimal to 4 = marked); fibroglandular tissue (BI-RADS FGT); background parenchymal enhancement (BI-RADS BPE); lesion size; lesion type; and BI-RADS score. Univariate (Chi-square) and multivariate (Generalized Estimation Equations [GEE]) statistics were used to identify factors influencing sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy.

RESULTS

Lesions were: 230 mass (68.9%) and 59 non-mass (17.7%), no foci. Forty-five lesions (13.5%) did not enhance in MRI but were suspicious or unclear in conventional imaging. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 93.8%, 83.4%, and 89.8% for Reader 1 and 95.4%, 87.8%, and 91.9% for Reader 2. Lower sensitivity was observed in case of increased motion artifacts ( P = 0.007), non-mass lesions ( P < 0.001), and small lesions ≤ 10 mm ( P < 0.021). No further factors (e.g. BPE, FGT) significantly influenced diagnostic estimates. At multivariate analysis, lesion type and size were retained as independent factors influencing the diagnostic performance ( P < 0.033).

CONCLUSION

Motion artifacts can impair lesion characterization with breast MRI, but lesion type and small size have the strongest influence on diagnostic estimates.

Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging characteristics of oval circumscribed fast enhancing lesions in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer

The aim of this study was to investigate the follow-up results and characteristics of oval circumscribed lesions with fast initial enhancement on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer.Preoperative data from consecutive patients newly diagnosed with breast cancer between 2010 and 2013 were retrospectively reviewed. Only MRI reports containing, "oval shape, circumscribed margin, and fast initial enhancement," were extracted and analyzed. Follow-up results and clinical and pathological findings were evaluated.A total of 430 oval circumscribed lesions with fast initial enhancement were included. Forty-eight lesions were pathologically confirmed at initial workup and 382 were followed up. Among the 48 lesions, 14 were found to have additional malignancy and 34 were benign. Among the 382 followed-up lesions, only 1 was subsequently confirmed to be malignant. There were no evident changes in any of the remaining lesions during follow-up. The overall rate of malignancy was 3.5% (15/430). When lesions exhibited delayed washout enhancing kinetics (P < .001), were located ipsilaterally (P = .007), and closer to the primary tumor (P = .012), the possibility of malignancy was high. High T2-weighted imaging signal intensity suggested benignity (P = .043).Although the probability of being diagnosed with malignancy during follow-up in this study was low (0.3%), this investigation revealed several preoperative MRI characteristics that should alert clinicians to the possibility of malignancy.

MRI texture analysis in differentiating luminal A and luminal B breast cancer molecular subtypes - a feasibility study

Background

The aim of this study was to use texture analysis (TA) of breast magnetic resonance (MR) images to assist in differentiating estrogen receptor (ER) positive breast cancer molecular subtypes.

Methods

Twenty-seven patients with histopathologically proven invasive ductal breast cancer were selected in preliminary study. Tumors were classified into molecular subtypes: luminal A (ER-positive and/or progesterone receptor (PR)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 (HER2) -negative, proliferation marker Ki-67 < 20 and low grade (I)) and luminal B (ER-positive and/or PR-positive, HER2-positive or HER2-negative with high Ki-67 ≥ 20 and higher grade (II or III)). Co-occurrence matrix -based texture features were extracted from each tumor on T1-weighted non fat saturated pre- and postcontrast MR images using TA software MaZda. Texture parameters and tumour volumes were correlated with tumour prognostic factors.

Results

Textural differences were observed mainly in precontrast images. The two most discriminative texture parameters to differentiate luminal A and luminal B subtypes were sum entropy and sum variance (p = 0.003). The AUCs were 0.828 for sum entropy (p = 0.004), and 0.833 for sum variance (p = 0.003), and 0.878 for the model combining texture features sum entropy, sum variance (p = 0.001). In the LOOCV, the AUC for model combining features sum entropy and sum variance was 0.876. Sum entropy and sum variance showed positive correlation with higher Ki-67 index. Luminal B types were larger in volume and moderate correlation between larger tumour volume and higher Ki-67 index was also observed (r = 0.499, p = 0.008).

Conclusions

Texture features which measure randomness, heterogeneity or smoothness and homogeneity may either directly or indirectly reflect underlying growth patterns of breast tumours. TA and volumetric analysis may provide a way to evaluate the biologic aggressiveness of breast tumours and provide aid in decisions regarding therapeutic efficacy.

Breast magnetic resonance imaging performance: safety, techniques, and updates on diffusion-weighted imaging and magnetic resonance spectroscopy

Dynamic contrast-enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a well-established, highly sensitive technique for the detection and evaluation of breast cancer. Optimal performance of breast MRI continues to evolve. This article addresses breast MRI applications, covers emerging breast MRI safety concerns; outlines the technical aspects of breast MRI, including equipment and protocols at 3 T and 1.5 T; and describes current promising areas of research including diffusion-weighted imaging and magnetic resonance spectroscopy.

Positioning in breast MR imaging to optimize image quality

Improper positioning of the breasts in a dedicated breast coil causes inhomogeneous fat saturation as well as other artifacts that decrease the sensitivity of breast magnetic resonance imaging. Improper positioning can create artifacts that can obscure a malignancy or cause it to be missed. Goals of proper positioning include imaging the maximum area of breast tissue, minimizing skin folds, and achieving homogeneous fat suppression and nondeformed breast parenchyma. Review of prior images gives the technologist an impression of what the positioning and imaging challenges may be in each patient before the patient enters the imaging unit. Checking the triplane localizer images and repositioning as necessary before any diagnostic or interventional imaging is key. Using a fat saturation pad, changing the arm position, or "rolling" the patient may be considered in difficult cases. Padding to support the patient in an oblique position, using angled sponges to increase breast compression thickness, and raising the grid to access posterior lesions may be helpful in targeting difficult-to-access lesions for biopsy. Using the presented positioning techniques and suggestions, in addition to strict attention to detail before imaging, will improve image quality, decrease imaging time and suboptimal images, and limit the need for repeat imaging studies.

Bone tumor mimickers: A pictorial essay

Focal lesions in bone are very common and many of these lesions are not bone tumors. These bone tumor mimickers can include numerous normal anatomic variants and non-neoplastic processes. Many of these tumor mimickers can be left alone, while others can be due to a significant disease process. It is important for the radiologist and clinician to be aware of these bone tumor mimickers and understand the characteristic features which allow discrimination between them and true neoplasms in order to avoid unnecessary additional workup. Knowing which lesions to leave alone or which ones require workup can prevent misdiagnosis and reduce patient anxiety.

Contralateral enhancing lesions on magnetic resonance imaging in patients with breast cancer: role of second-look sonography and imaging findings of synchronous contralateral cancer

OBJECTIVES

The purposes of this study were to assess the clinical utility of sonography for evaluation of contralateral suspicious lesions detected on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with breast cancer and to compare imaging findings of the index and synchronous contralateral cancers.

METHODS

We performed breast MRI on 853 consecutive patients with histologically confirmed breast cancer between January 2006 and December 2009. All patients underwent mammography and whole-breast sonography before MRI. We included 126 contralateral enhancing lesions in 98 patients who underwent second-look sonography. Lesions with sonographic correlation were biopsied using sonographic guidance, and lesions without sonographic correlation were biopsied using computed tomographic guidance or followed with imaging modalities.

RESULTS

Of 126 suspicious lesions, 81 (64%) were correlated on sonography, and 45 (36%) were not. Of 81 correlated lesions, 16 (20%) were malignant, and 65 (80%) were benign. Of 45 lesions that were not correlated on sonography, only 1 (2%) was malignant. Of 17 contralateral cancers, 11 were detected on initial sonography and 5 on second-look sonography. The index and contralateral cancers showed statistically significant differences in the sonographic boundary (P = .003) and posterior echogenicity (P = .013). The contralateral cancers detected on initial or second-look sonography showed significant differences in the echo pattern (P = .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Magnetic resonance imaging is a reliable tool for detection of occult contralateral breast cancer. With second-look sonography, we can find additional contralateral cancer. When enhancing lesions on MRI are not correlated on sonography, MRI- or computed tomography-guided biopsy or short-term imaging follow-up should be done.

Pearls and pitfalls in breast MRI

At our academic institution, we have noticed repeated examples of both false-positive and false-negative MR diagnoses in breast cancer. The most common diagnostic errors in interpreting MRI of the breast are discussed in this review and experience-based advice is provided to avoid similar mistakes. The most common reasons for false-positive diagnoses are misinterpretation of artefacts, confusion between normal enhancing structures and tumours and, above all, insufficient use of the American College of Radiology breast imaging reporting and data system lexicon, whereas false-negative diagnoses are made as a result of missed tiny enhancement, a background-enhancing breast, or enhancement interpreted as benign rather than malignant.

Optimizing 1.5-Tesla and 3-Tesla dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breasts

The technical requirements for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the breasts are challenging because high temporal and high spatial resolution are necessary. This article describes the necessary equipment and pulse sequences for performing a high-quality study. Although imaging at 3-Tesla (T) has a higher signal-to-noise ratio, the protocol needs to be modified from the 1.5-T system to provide optimal imaging. The article presents the requirements for performing breast MRI and discusses techniques to ensure high-quality examinations on 1.5-T and 3-T systems.

MR-directed ("Second-Look") ultrasound examination for breast lesions detected initially on MRI: MR and sonographic findings

OBJECTIVE

The objective of our study was to assess the clinical utility of MR-directed ("second-look") ultrasound examination to search for breast lesions detected initially on MRI.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of the records of 158 consecutive patients (202 lesions) with breast abnormalities initially detected on MRI between July 2003 and May 2006. All lesions were detected as enhancing findings on a dynamic contrast MR study and were subsequently evaluated with ultrasound. Ultrasound was performed using MR images as a guide to lesion location, size, and morphology. Pathology findings were confirmed by subsequent percutaneous biopsy or lesion excision. Imaging follow-up was used for probably benign lesions, which were not biopsied.

RESULTS

Of the 202 MRI-detected lesions, ultrasound correlation was made in 115 (57%) including 33 malignant lesions and 82 benign lesions. The remaining 87 lesions were not sonographically correlated and included 11 malignant lesions and 76 nonmalignant lesions. Mass lesions identified on MRI were more likely to have a sonographic correlate than nonmasslike lesions (65% vs 12%, respectively); malignant mass lesions were more likely to show an ultrasound correlation (85%). The malignant lesions with successful sonographic correlation tended to present with subtle sonographic findings.

CONCLUSION

MR-directed ultrasound of MRI-detected lesions was useful for decision making as part of the diagnostic workup. Malignant lesions were likely to have an ultrasound correlate, especially when they presented as masses on MRI. However, the sonographic findings of these lesions were often subtle, and careful scanning technique was needed for successful MRI-ultrasound correlation.

Typical atypical findings on dynamic MRI of the breast

Dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE MRI) of the breast has become an important tool to detect and characterize breast disease. The American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS(®)) provides a standardized vocabulary for describing the morphologic features and contrast kinetics of breast lesions. However, some lesions may show morphologic and dynamic MR features not consistent with their histologic nature resulting in incorrect categorization as malignant or benign. Another cause of diagnostic problems is artifacts. Thus correct interpretation of dynamic MRI of the breast demands knowledge of the most common pitfalls encountered in clinical practice. A pictorial overview of these is presented, with particular reference to the differentiation of malignant tumors from benign lesions.