1
|
Mokry T, Pantke J, Kauczor HU, Laun FB, Schlemmer HP, Kuder TA, Bickelhaupt S. Influence of field strength on quantitative parameters and feature stability in the assessment of the ovaries using 1.5-T and 3-T MRI. Acta Radiol 2025; 66:512-520. [PMID: 39905712 DOI: 10.1177/02841851241313021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2025]
Abstract
BackgroundLittle is known of the influence of scanner field strength on quantitative diffusivity variables, especially kurtosis in healthy ovaries.PurposeTo evaluate the influence of scanner field strength on quantitative diffusion variables in pelvic MRI of the ovaries.Material and MethodsThis prospective, single-centre study consisted of repeated 1.5-T and 3-T examinations in 30 female volunteers (mean age=27.9 years, age range=20.3-45.2 years) from July 2017 to September 2019. Multi b-value DWI 0, 50, 100, 800, 1500, 2000 s/mm2 was acquired over three timepoints during the menstrual cycle. Ovaries were segmented at b = 1500 s/mm2. Median apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and advanced kurtosis parameters Dapp and Kapp were calculated. Statistical analysis was performed with the variations of diffusivity variables being compared between 1.5-T and 3-T MRI using a Mann-Whitney rank-sum test.ResultsMedian ADC and Dapp (µm²/ms) did not statistically differ. Median ADC were 1.509 (range=1.371-1.610), 1.619 (range=1.463-1.747), and 1.511 (range=1.423-1.639) at 1.5 T; 1.542 (range=1.428-1.682), 1.658 (range=1.510-1.806), and 1.572 (range=1.455-1.709) at 3 T (P = 0.14, 0.19, and 0.07), whereas median Dapp were 2.024 (range=1.913-2.152), 2.192 (range=2.010-2.327), and 2.045 (range=1.958-2.170) at 1.5 T; 2.013 (range=1.952-2.188), 2.179 (range=2.018-2.327), and 2.082 (range=1.959-2.194) at 3 T (P = 0.77, 0.99, and 0.34) for timepoints 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Statistical comparison of Kapp revealed significant differences for all timepoints: 0.629 (range=0.595-0.652), 0.604 (range=0.574-0.651), and 0.622 (range=0.581-0.664) at 1.5 T; 0.601 (range=0.563-0.626), 0.567 (range=0.526-0.633), and 0.599 (range=0.541-0.650) at 3 T (P < 0.001, 0.005, and 0.03).ConclusionDiffusivity mapping in the ovaries provides similar absolute median diffusion values, but statistically significant differences in absolute kurtosis values between 1.5 T and 3 T.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Theresa Mokry
- Clinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Judith Pantke
- Institut for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - Hans-Ulrich Kauczor
- Clinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Frederik B Laun
- Institut for Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | | | - Tristan A Kuder
- Department of Physics, German Canter Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Arian A, Karimi N, Ahmadinejad N, Azadnajafabad S, Delazar S. Refining MRI protocols for endometriosis: a comparative study of abbreviated and full MRI sequences. Br J Radiol 2025; 98:287-295. [PMID: 39531257 PMCID: PMC11751362 DOI: 10.1093/bjr/tqae230] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2024] [Revised: 09/16/2024] [Accepted: 10/31/2024] [Indexed: 11/16/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Endometriosis is a significant cause of chronic abdominal pain and infertility in females, often overlooked due to its resemblance to other abdominopelvic pathologies. This study aims to compare the diagnostic performance and agreement rate between an abbreviated MRI protocol (aMRI) and a full MRI protocol (fMRI) for detecting pelvic endometriosis. METHODS We retrospectively analysed 446 consecutive MRI exams, including both full (fMRI) and abbreviated (aMRI) protocols, performed for suspected pelvic endometriosis. An expert radiologist assessed the presence of endometriosis at 14 distinct anatomical sites. Each MRI protocol was interpreted in random order, with a minimum two-week interval between sessions to minimize recall bias. Agreement between the protocols was evaluated using kappa statistics. RESULTS The average age of the patients was 34.13 years. The highest incidences of endometriosis were found in the ovaries (88.8%) and the recto-uterine pouch (65%). The MRI protocols demonstrated perfect agreement (kappa coefficient = 1) for the ovaries, bladder, uterus, and caesarean section scar. High agreement was also observed in the rectum and uterine ligaments (kappa coefficients of 0.98 and 0.97). Detection of malignant transformation in existing ovarian endometriomas showed substantial concordance with a kappa coefficient of 0.66. CONCLUSIONS An abbreviated non-contrast MRI protocol exhibits diagnostic accuracy comparable to that of a comprehensive protocol in detecting pelvic endometriosis, with similar confidence and reproducibility. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE This study demonstrates that an abbreviated MRI protocol is as effective as a full protocol in diagnosing pelvic endometriosis, potentially allowing for quicker, cost-effective imaging without compromising diagnostic accuracy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arvin Arian
- Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Advanced Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Research Center (ADIR), Imam Khomeini Hospital complex (IKHC), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 1416753955, Iran
| | - Nafise Karimi
- Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Advanced Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Research Center (ADIR), Imam Khomeini Hospital complex (IKHC), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 1416753955, Iran
| | - Nasrin Ahmadinejad
- Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Advanced Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Research Center (ADIR), Imam Khomeini Hospital complex (IKHC), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 1416753955, Iran
| | - Sina Azadnajafabad
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds LS7 4SA, United Kingdom
| | - Sina Delazar
- Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Advanced Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Research Center (ADIR), Imam Khomeini Hospital complex (IKHC), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 1416753955, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kandemir H, Sözen H, Kartal MG, Özkan ZG, Topuz S, Salihoğlu MY. An Assessment of the Effectiveness of Preoperative İmaging Modalities (MRI, CT, and 18F-FDG PET/CT) in Determining the Extent of Disease Spread in Epithelial Ovarian-Tubal-Peritoneal Cancer (EOC). MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2025; 61:199. [PMID: 40005316 PMCID: PMC11857206 DOI: 10.3390/medicina61020199] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2024] [Revised: 01/16/2025] [Accepted: 01/17/2025] [Indexed: 02/27/2025]
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Epithelial ovarian-tubal-peritoneal cancer (EOC) is the most common type of ovarian cancer. Optimal cytoreductive surgery is the most important prognostic factor in its management. When complete cytoreduction is anticipated to be challenging, neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy (NACT) becomes an alternative. Imaging modalities are utilized in the decision-making process for primary treatment. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic performance and accuracy of preoperative MRI, CT, and 18F-FDG PET/CT in detecting the extent of EOC. Materials and Methods: Between 2017 and 2018, 24 patients with primary (with or without neoadjuvant chemotherapy) or recurrent EOC diagnosed at the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, were enrolled in this study. These 24 women underwent preoperative imaging modalities within 7 days prior to surgery. The results were compared with histopathological findings, considered the gold standard. Results: We evaluated 24 anatomic regions most commonly involved in EOC. The sensitivity of MRI, CT, and PET/CT in detecting ≥ 0.5 cm implants was 95%, 84%, and 86%, respectively. However, when including implants < 0.5 cm, sensitivity decreased significantly to 40%, 38%, and 42%, respectively. The calculated area under the curve (AUC) for tumors, including those < 0.5 cm, was evaluated as weak for all three modalities (MRI: 0.689, CT: 0.678, PET/CT: 0.691), with PET/CT detecting the largest area. For detecting tumors ≥ 0.5 cm, the AUCs were 0.974, 0.921, and 0.923 for MRI, CT, and PET/CT, respectively. The largest AUC was calculated with MRI, and the AUCs for all three methods were evaluated as excellent. Accuracy was comparable among all three imaging modalities, and no statistically significant differences were found (p < 0.05). Conclusions: While imaging modalities are valuable tools for evaluating abdominal spread in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), they have demonstrated limited success in detecting miliary disease. The risk of false negatives for miliary tumors on PET/CT may be mitigated by combining it with other imaging modalities such as MRI or CT. Further investigations are necessary to identify more accurate imaging techniques for this challenging clinical scenario.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hülya Kandemir
- Department of Obstetric and Gynecology, Şanlıurfa Training and Research Hospital, 63250 Şanlıurfa, Turkey
| | - Hamdullah Sözen
- Department of Gyneacological Oncology, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, 34093 Istanbul, Turkey; (H.S.); (S.T.); (M.Y.S.)
| | - Merve Gülbiz Kartal
- Department of Radiology, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, 34093 Istanbul, Turkey;
| | - Zeynep Gözde Özkan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, 34093 Istanbul, Turkey;
| | - Samet Topuz
- Department of Gyneacological Oncology, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, 34093 Istanbul, Turkey; (H.S.); (S.T.); (M.Y.S.)
| | - Mehmet Yavuz Salihoğlu
- Department of Gyneacological Oncology, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, 34093 Istanbul, Turkey; (H.S.); (S.T.); (M.Y.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Davoudian K, Spagnolo S, Chan E, Hianik T, Thompson M. Acoustic Wave Sensor Detection of an Ovarian Cancer Biomarker with Antifouling Surface Chemistry. SENSORS (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2024; 24:7884. [PMID: 39771624 PMCID: PMC11678973 DOI: 10.3390/s24247884] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2024] [Revised: 11/26/2024] [Accepted: 12/04/2024] [Indexed: 01/11/2025]
Abstract
Ovarian cancer (OC) must be detected in its early stages when the mortality rate is the lowest to provide patients with the best chance of survival. Lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) is a critical OC biomarker since its levels are elevated across all stages and increase with disease progression. This paper presents an LPA assay based on a thickness shear mode acoustic sensor with dissipation monitoring that involves a new thiol molecule 3-(2-mercaptoethanoxy)propanoic acid (HS-MEG-COOH). HS-MEG-COOH is an antifouling linker that provides (a) antifouling properties for gold substrates and (b) linking ability via its terminal carboxylic acid functional group. The antifouling ability of HS-MEG-COOH was tested in whole human serum. The new molecule was applied to the LPA assay in conjunction with a spacer molecule, 2-(2-mercaptoethoxy)ethan-1-ol (HS-MEG-OH), in a 1:1 v/v ratio. HS-MEG-COOH was covalently linked to gelsolin-actin, a protein complex probe that dissociates due to LPA-binding. LPA was detected in phosphate-buffered saline and undiluted human serum and achieved a low limit of detection (1.0 and 0.7 μM, respectively) which was below the concentration of LPA in healthy individuals. The antifouling properties of HS-MEG-COOH and the detection of LPA demonstrate the ability of the sensor to successfully identify the early-stage OC biomarker in undiluted human serum.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharina Davoudian
- Department of Chemistry, University of Toronto, 80 St. George Street, Toronto, ON M5S 3H6, Canada; (K.D.); (E.C.)
| | - Sandro Spagnolo
- Faculty of Mathematics, Physics and Informatics, Comenius University, Mlynská dolina F1, 842 48 Bratislava, Slovakia; (S.S.); (T.H.)
| | - Edmund Chan
- Department of Chemistry, University of Toronto, 80 St. George Street, Toronto, ON M5S 3H6, Canada; (K.D.); (E.C.)
| | - Tibor Hianik
- Faculty of Mathematics, Physics and Informatics, Comenius University, Mlynská dolina F1, 842 48 Bratislava, Slovakia; (S.S.); (T.H.)
| | - Michael Thompson
- Department of Chemistry, University of Toronto, 80 St. George Street, Toronto, ON M5S 3H6, Canada; (K.D.); (E.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sun JN, Li Y, Luan M, Wu L, Liu FH, Li YZ, Xu HL, Wei YF, Xiao Q, Li XY, Xu J, Liu KX, Huang DH, Wu QJ, Gong TT. Pre- and post-polyphenol intake and ovarian cancer survival: evidence from a prospective cohort study. Eur J Nutr 2024; 64:14. [PMID: 39567373 DOI: 10.1007/s00394-024-03516-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2024] [Accepted: 10/24/2024] [Indexed: 11/22/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Although (poly)phenols have shown potential in anti-cancer activities, their impact on improving ovarian cancer (OC) survival remains unknown. Therefore, we aim to first investigate the association between dietary polyphenol intake and OC survival, providing valuable insights into potential interventions. METHODS The prospective cohort recruited 560 patients with OC to assess the associations of polyphenol intake, not only pre- and post-diagnosis but also the change from pre- to post-diagnosis with OC survival. Dietary intakes of total (poly)phenols and their five classes (flavonoids, phenolic acids, lignans, stilbenes, and other polyphenols) were assessed using a validated 111-item food frequency questionnaire. Overall survival (OS) was tracked through active follow-up and medical records until February 16th, 2023. Cox proportional hazard regression models were applied to calculate the hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS During a median follow-up of 44.4 months, 211 all-cause deaths were identified. We observed significant associations between higher polyphenol intake with lower risk of mortality among patients with OC ((HR T3 vs. T1 = 0.55, 95%CI = 0.35-0.87 for pre-diagnosis; and HR T3 vs. T1 = 0.59, 95%CI = 0.39-0.90 for post-diagnosis). Consistently, an evident linear trend was observed for polyphenol and flavonoid intake with OC survival. Of note, compared to the stable group (change within 10%), the decreased intake (change of more than 10%) of total (poly)phenols and five polyphenol classes was significantly associated with worse OS. CONCLUSION Dietary (poly)phenols, as well as its five classes, have an inverse association with OC survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jia-Nan Sun
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Yu Li
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Meng Luan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Lang Wu
- Cancer Epidemiology Division, Population Sciences in the Pacific Program, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, HI, USA
| | - Fang-Hua Liu
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- Key Laboratory of Precision Medical Research on Major Chronic Disease, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Yi-Zi Li
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- Key Laboratory of Precision Medical Research on Major Chronic Disease, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - He-Li Xu
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- Key Laboratory of Precision Medical Research on Major Chronic Disease, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Yi-Fan Wei
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- Key Laboratory of Precision Medical Research on Major Chronic Disease, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Qian Xiao
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- Hospital Management Office, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Xiao-Ying Li
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- Key Laboratory of Precision Medical Research on Major Chronic Disease, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Jin Xu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Ke-Xin Liu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Dong-Hui Huang
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
- Key Laboratory of Precision Medical Research on Major Chronic Disease, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
| | - Qi-Jun Wu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
- Key Laboratory of Precision Medical Research on Major Chronic Disease, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
- NHC Key Laboratory of Advanced Reproductive Medicine and Fertility (China Medical University), National Health Commission, Shenyang, China.
| | - Ting-Ting Gong
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Davoudian K, Bhattacharya S, Thompson D, Thompson M. Coupled Electrostatic and Hydrophobic Destabilisation of the Gelsolin-Actin Complex Enables Facile Detection of Ovarian Cancer Biomarker Lysophosphatidic Acid. Biomolecules 2023; 13:1426. [PMID: 37759826 PMCID: PMC10527313 DOI: 10.3390/biom13091426] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2023] [Revised: 09/12/2023] [Accepted: 09/15/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) is a promising biomarker candidate to screen for ovarian cancer (OC) and potentially stratify and treat patients according to disease stage. LPA is known to target the actin-binding protein gelsolin which is a key regulator of actin filament assembly. Previous studies have shown that the phosphate headgroup of LPA alone is inadequate to bind to the short chain of amino acids in gelsolin known as the PIP2-binding domain. Thus, the molecular-level detail of the mechanism of LPA binding is poorly understood. Here, we model LPA binding to the PIP2-binding domain of gelsolin in the gelsolin-actin complex through extensive ten-microsecond atomistic molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. We predict that LPA binding causes a local conformational rearrangement due to LPA interactions with both gelsolin and actin residues. These conformational changes are a result of the amphipathic nature of LPA, where the anionic phosphate, polar glycerol and ester groups, and lipophilic aliphatic tail mediate LPA binding via charged electrostatic, hydrogen bonding, and van der Waals interactions. The negatively-charged LPA headgroup binds to the PIP2-binding domain of gelsolin-actin while its hydrophobic tail is inserted into actin, creating a strong LPA-insertion pocket that weakens the gelsolin-actin interface. The computed structure, dynamics, and energetics of the ternary gelsolin-LPA-actin complex confirms that a quantitative OC assay is possible based on LPA-triggered actin release from the gelsolin-actin complex.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharina Davoudian
- Department of Chemistry, University of Toronto, 80 St. George Street, Toronto, ON M5S 3H6, Canada;
| | - Shayon Bhattacharya
- SSPC—The Science Foundation Ireland Research Centre for Pharmaceuticals, V94 T9PX Limerick, Ireland;
- Department of Physics, Bernal Institute, University of Limerick, V94 T9PX Limerick, Ireland
| | - Damien Thompson
- SSPC—The Science Foundation Ireland Research Centre for Pharmaceuticals, V94 T9PX Limerick, Ireland;
- Department of Physics, Bernal Institute, University of Limerick, V94 T9PX Limerick, Ireland
| | - Michael Thompson
- Department of Chemistry, University of Toronto, 80 St. George Street, Toronto, ON M5S 3H6, Canada;
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Wang T, Cui W, Nie F, Huang X, Huang L, Liu L, Zhu Y, Zheng R. Comparative Study of the Efficacy of the Ovarian-Adnexa Reporting and Data System Ultrasound Combined With Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound and the ADNEX MR Scoring System in the Diagnosis of Adnexal Masses. ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE & BIOLOGY 2023:S0301-5629(23)00170-9. [PMID: 37321953 DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2023.05.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2023] [Revised: 04/23/2023] [Accepted: 05/22/2023] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aims of this study were to develop the Ovarian-Adnexa Reporting and Data System (O-RADS) and O-RADS + contrast-enhanced ultrasound (O-RADS CEUS) scoring system to distinguish adnexal masses (AMs) and to compare the diagnostic efficacy of these systems with that of a magnetic resonance imaging scoring system (ADNEX MR). METHODS We retrospectively evaluated 278 ovarian masses from 240 patients between May 2017 and July 2022. Pathology and adequate follow-up were used as reference standards for comparing the validity of O-RADS, O-RADS CEUS and ADNEX MR scoring to diagnose AMs. Area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity and specificity were calculated. The inter-class correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated to evaluate inter-reader agreement (IRA) between the two sonographers and two radiologists who analyzed the findings with the three modalities. RESULTS The AUCs of O-RADS, O-RADS CEUS and ADNEX MR scores were 0.928 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.895-0.956), 0.951(95% CI: 0.919-0.973) and 0.964 (95% CI: 0.935-0.983), respectively. Their sensitivities were 95.7%, 94.3 and 91.4%, and their specificities were 81.3%, 92.3% and 97.1%, respectively. The three modalities had accuracies of 84.9%, 92.8% and 95.7%, respectively. O-RADS had the highest sensitivity but significantly lower specificity (p < 0.001), whereas the ADNEX MR scoring had the highest specificity (p < 0.001) but lower sensitivity (p < 0.001). O-RADS CEUS had intermediate sensitivity and specificity (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION The addition of CEUS significantly improves the efficacy of O-RADS in diagnosing AMs. The diagnostic efficacy of the combination is comparable to that of the ADNEX MR scoring system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ting Wang
- Ultrasound Medical Center, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Cuiyingmen No.82, Chengguan District, Lanzhou 730030, China; Gansu Province Clinical Research Center for Ultrasonography, Lanzhou, China; Gansu Province Medical Engineering Research Center for Intelligence Ultrasound, Lanzhou, China
| | - Wenjun Cui
- Department of Magnetic Resonance, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Gansu, China
| | - Fang Nie
- Ultrasound Medical Center, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Cuiyingmen No.82, Chengguan District, Lanzhou 730030, China; Gansu Province Clinical Research Center for Ultrasonography, Lanzhou, China; Gansu Province Medical Engineering Research Center for Intelligence Ultrasound, Lanzhou, China.
| | - Xiao Huang
- Ultrasound Medical Center, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Cuiyingmen No.82, Chengguan District, Lanzhou 730030, China; Gansu Province Clinical Research Center for Ultrasonography, Lanzhou, China; Gansu Province Medical Engineering Research Center for Intelligence Ultrasound, Lanzhou, China
| | - Lele Huang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Gansu, China
| | - Luping Liu
- Ultrasound Medical Center, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Cuiyingmen No.82, Chengguan District, Lanzhou 730030, China; Gansu Province Clinical Research Center for Ultrasonography, Lanzhou, China; Gansu Province Medical Engineering Research Center for Intelligence Ultrasound, Lanzhou, China
| | - Yangyang Zhu
- Ultrasound Medical Center, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Cuiyingmen No.82, Chengguan District, Lanzhou 730030, China; Gansu Province Clinical Research Center for Ultrasonography, Lanzhou, China; Gansu Province Medical Engineering Research Center for Intelligence Ultrasound, Lanzhou, China
| | - Rongfang Zheng
- Department of Gynaecology, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Gansu, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Panico C, Avesani G, Zormpas-Petridis K, Rundo L, Nero C, Sala E. Radiomics and Radiogenomics of Ovarian Cancer. Radiol Clin North Am 2023; 61:749-760. [PMID: 37169435 DOI: 10.1016/j.rcl.2023.02.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/03/2023]
Abstract
Ovarian cancer, one of the deadliest gynecologic malignancies, is characterized by high intra- and inter-site genomic and phenotypic heterogeneity. The traditional information provided by the conventional interpretation of diagnostic imaging studies cannot adequately represent this heterogeneity. Radiomics analyses can capture the complex patterns related to the microstructure of the tissues and provide quantitative information about them. This review outlines how radiomics and its integration with other quantitative biological information, like genomics and proteomics, can impact the clinical management of ovarian cancer.
Collapse
|
9
|
Reilly GP, Dunton CJ, Bullock RG, Ure DR, Fritsche H, Ghosh S, Pappas TC, Phan RT. Validation of a deep neural network-based algorithm supporting clinical management of adnexal mass. Front Med (Lausanne) 2023; 10:1102437. [PMID: 36756174 PMCID: PMC9900123 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1102437] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2022] [Accepted: 01/02/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Conservative management of adnexal mass is warranted when there is imaging-based and clinical evidence of benign characteristics. Malignancy risk is, however, a concern due to the mortality rate of ovarian cancer. Malignancy occurs in 10-15% of adnexal masses that go to surgery, whereas the rate of malignancy is much lower in masses clinically characterized as benign or indeterminate. Additional diagnostic tests could assist conservative management of these patients. Here we report the clinical validation of OvaWatch, a multivariate index assay, with real-world evidence of performance that supports conservative management of adnexal masses. Methods OvaWatch utilizes a previously characterized neural network-based algorithm combining serum biomarkers and clinical covariates and was used to examine malignancy risk in prospective and retrospective samples of patients with an adnexal mass. Retrospective data sets were assembled from previous studies using patients who had adnexal mass and were scheduled for surgery. The prospective study was a multi-center trial of women with adnexal mass as identified on clinical examination and indeterminate or asymptomatic by imaging. The performance to detect ovarian malignancy was evaluated at a previously validated score threshold. Results In retrospective, low prevalence (N = 1,453, 1.5% malignancy rate) data from patients that received an independent physician assessment of benign, OvaWatch has a sensitivity of 81.8% [95% confidence interval (CI) 65.1-92.7] for identifying a histologically confirmed malignancy, and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 99.7%. OvaWatch identified 18/22 malignancies missed by physician assessment. A prospective data set had 501 patients where 106 patients with adnexal mass went for surgery. The prevalence was 2% (10 malignancies). The sensitivity of OvaWatch for malignancy was 40% (95% CI: 16.8-68.7%), and the specificity was 87% (95% CI: 83.7-89.7) when patients were included in the analysis who did not go to surgery and were evaluated as benign. The NPV remained 98.6% (95% CI: 97.0-99.4%). An independent analysis set with a high prevalence (45.8%) the NPV value was 87.8% (95% CI: 95% CI: 75.8-94.3%). Conclusion OvaWatch demonstrated high NPV across diverse data sets and promises utility as an effective diagnostic test supporting management of suspected benign or indeterminate mass to safely decrease or delay unnecessary surgeries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Srinka Ghosh
- Aspira Women’s Health, Austin, TX, United States
| | | | - Ryan T. Phan
- Aspira Women’s Health, Austin, TX, United States
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Alcala JMF, Mussi TC, Raiza LCP, Baroni RH. T2-weighted imaging hypointensity in an ovarian lesion: is it a benign finding? EINSTEIN-SAO PAULO 2022; 20:eAO6851. [PMID: 35649059 PMCID: PMC9126602 DOI: 10.31744/einstein_journal/2022ao6851] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2021] [Accepted: 11/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To evaluate whether the presence of a hypointense signal at T2-weighted imaging in a solid ovarian lesion on magnetic resonance imaging is a predictor of stability and benignity. Methods This is a single center study, prospectively read with retrospective acquired data. The database was searched for patients who underwent magnetic resonance imaging between January 2008 and October 2019 and whose reports mentioned solid ovarian lesions with low signal on T2-weighted imaging. A total of 47 nodules were included. A radiologist who was blinded to the clinical indication for magnetic resonance imaging and original reports evaluated the cases. Objective and subjective criteria of ovarian lesions in magnetic resonance imaging were evaluated. Results Thirty-five nodules were considered benign/stable and 12 were considered non-stable. The analysis showed that the non-stable lesions showed statistically more hyperintensity at T1-weighted imaging compared to the stable lesions. Conclusion T2-weighted imaging hypointensity can be considered a predictor of stability in solid ovarian lesions when associated with iso/hypointensity in T1-weighted imaging.
Collapse
|
11
|
Amado Cabana S, Gallego Ojea J, Félez Carballada M. Usefulness of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in characterizing ovarian tumors classified as indeterminate at ultrasonography. RADIOLOGIA 2022; 64:110-118. [DOI: 10.1016/j.rxeng.2020.05.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2020] [Accepted: 05/20/2020] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
12
|
Wengert GJ, Dabi Y, Kermarrec E, Jalaguier-Coudray A, Poncelet E, Porcher R, Thomassin-Naggara I, Rockall AG. O-RADS MRI Classification of Indeterminate Adnexal Lesions: Time-Intensity Curve Analysis Is Better Than Visual Assessment. Radiology 2022; 303:566-575. [PMID: 35230183 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.210342] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
Background The MRI Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System (O-RADS) enables risk stratification of sonographically indeterminate adnexal lesions, partly based on time-intensity curve (TIC) analysis, which may not be universally available. Purpose To compare the diagnostic accuracy of visual assessment with that of TIC assessment of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI scans to categorize adnexal lesions as benign or malignant and to evaluate the influence on the O-RADS MRI score. Materials and Methods The European Adnex MR Study Group, or EURAD, database, a prospective multicenter study of women undergoing MRI for indeterminate adnexal lesions between March 2013 and March 2018, was queried retrospectively. Women undergoing surgery for an adnexal lesion with solid tissue were included. Solid tissue enhancement relative to outer myometrium was assessed visually and with TIC. Contrast material washout was recorded. Lesions were categorized according to the O-RADS MRI score with visual and TIC assessment. Per-lesion diagnostic accuracy was calculated. Results A total of 320 lesions (207 malignant, 113 benign) in 244 women (mean age, 55.3 years ± 15.8 [standard deviation]) were analyzed. Sensitivity for malignancy was 96% (198 of 207) and 76% (157 of 207) for TIC and visual assessment, respectively. TIC was more accurate than visual assessment (86% [95% CI: 81, 90] vs 78% [95% CI: 73, 82]; P < .001) for benign lesions, predominantly because of higher specificity (95% [95% CI: 92, 98] vs 76% [95% CI: 68, 81]). A total of 21% (38 of 177) of invasive lesions were rated as low risk visually. Contrast material washout and high-risk enhancement (defined as earlier enhancement than in the myometrium) were highly specific for malignancy for both TIC (97% [95% CI: 91, 99] and 94% [95% CI: 90, 97], respectively) and visual assessment (97% [95% CI: 92, 99] and 93% [95% CI: 88, 97], respectively). O-RADS MRI score was more accurate with TIC than with visual assessment (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.87 [95% CI: 0.83, 0.90] vs 0.73 [95% CI: 0.68, 0.78]; P < .001). Conclusion Time-intensity curve analysis was more accurate than visual assessment for achieving optimal diagnostic accuracy with the Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System MRI score. Clinical trial registration no. NCT01738789 © RSNA, 2022 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Vargas and Woo in this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georg J Wengert
- From the Division of Cancer and Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom (G.J.W., A.G.R.); Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria (G.J.W.); Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Y.D.) and Radiology (E.K., I.T.N.), Sorbonne University, Hôpital Tenon, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France; Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France (A.J.C.); Department of Women's Imaging, Centre Hospitalier de Valenciennes, Valenciennes, France (E.P.); Centre of Research Epidemiology and Statistics, Université de Paris, INSERM U1153, Paris, France (R.P.); Clinical Epidemiology Center, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Hôtel Dieu, Paris, France (R.P.); Institute for Computing and Data Sciences, Sorbonne University, Paris, France (I.T.N.); and Department of Radiology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom (A.G.R.)
| | - Yohann Dabi
- From the Division of Cancer and Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom (G.J.W., A.G.R.); Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria (G.J.W.); Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Y.D.) and Radiology (E.K., I.T.N.), Sorbonne University, Hôpital Tenon, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France; Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France (A.J.C.); Department of Women's Imaging, Centre Hospitalier de Valenciennes, Valenciennes, France (E.P.); Centre of Research Epidemiology and Statistics, Université de Paris, INSERM U1153, Paris, France (R.P.); Clinical Epidemiology Center, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Hôtel Dieu, Paris, France (R.P.); Institute for Computing and Data Sciences, Sorbonne University, Paris, France (I.T.N.); and Department of Radiology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom (A.G.R.)
| | - Edith Kermarrec
- From the Division of Cancer and Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom (G.J.W., A.G.R.); Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria (G.J.W.); Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Y.D.) and Radiology (E.K., I.T.N.), Sorbonne University, Hôpital Tenon, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France; Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France (A.J.C.); Department of Women's Imaging, Centre Hospitalier de Valenciennes, Valenciennes, France (E.P.); Centre of Research Epidemiology and Statistics, Université de Paris, INSERM U1153, Paris, France (R.P.); Clinical Epidemiology Center, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Hôtel Dieu, Paris, France (R.P.); Institute for Computing and Data Sciences, Sorbonne University, Paris, France (I.T.N.); and Department of Radiology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom (A.G.R.)
| | - Aurélie Jalaguier-Coudray
- From the Division of Cancer and Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom (G.J.W., A.G.R.); Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria (G.J.W.); Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Y.D.) and Radiology (E.K., I.T.N.), Sorbonne University, Hôpital Tenon, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France; Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France (A.J.C.); Department of Women's Imaging, Centre Hospitalier de Valenciennes, Valenciennes, France (E.P.); Centre of Research Epidemiology and Statistics, Université de Paris, INSERM U1153, Paris, France (R.P.); Clinical Epidemiology Center, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Hôtel Dieu, Paris, France (R.P.); Institute for Computing and Data Sciences, Sorbonne University, Paris, France (I.T.N.); and Department of Radiology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom (A.G.R.)
| | - Edouard Poncelet
- From the Division of Cancer and Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom (G.J.W., A.G.R.); Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria (G.J.W.); Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Y.D.) and Radiology (E.K., I.T.N.), Sorbonne University, Hôpital Tenon, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France; Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France (A.J.C.); Department of Women's Imaging, Centre Hospitalier de Valenciennes, Valenciennes, France (E.P.); Centre of Research Epidemiology and Statistics, Université de Paris, INSERM U1153, Paris, France (R.P.); Clinical Epidemiology Center, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Hôtel Dieu, Paris, France (R.P.); Institute for Computing and Data Sciences, Sorbonne University, Paris, France (I.T.N.); and Department of Radiology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom (A.G.R.)
| | - Raphaël Porcher
- From the Division of Cancer and Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom (G.J.W., A.G.R.); Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria (G.J.W.); Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Y.D.) and Radiology (E.K., I.T.N.), Sorbonne University, Hôpital Tenon, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France; Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France (A.J.C.); Department of Women's Imaging, Centre Hospitalier de Valenciennes, Valenciennes, France (E.P.); Centre of Research Epidemiology and Statistics, Université de Paris, INSERM U1153, Paris, France (R.P.); Clinical Epidemiology Center, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Hôtel Dieu, Paris, France (R.P.); Institute for Computing and Data Sciences, Sorbonne University, Paris, France (I.T.N.); and Department of Radiology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom (A.G.R.)
| | - Isabelle Thomassin-Naggara
- From the Division of Cancer and Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom (G.J.W., A.G.R.); Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria (G.J.W.); Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Y.D.) and Radiology (E.K., I.T.N.), Sorbonne University, Hôpital Tenon, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France; Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France (A.J.C.); Department of Women's Imaging, Centre Hospitalier de Valenciennes, Valenciennes, France (E.P.); Centre of Research Epidemiology and Statistics, Université de Paris, INSERM U1153, Paris, France (R.P.); Clinical Epidemiology Center, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Hôtel Dieu, Paris, France (R.P.); Institute for Computing and Data Sciences, Sorbonne University, Paris, France (I.T.N.); and Department of Radiology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom (A.G.R.)
| | - Andrea G Rockall
- From the Division of Cancer and Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom (G.J.W., A.G.R.); Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria (G.J.W.); Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Y.D.) and Radiology (E.K., I.T.N.), Sorbonne University, Hôpital Tenon, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France; Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France (A.J.C.); Department of Women's Imaging, Centre Hospitalier de Valenciennes, Valenciennes, France (E.P.); Centre of Research Epidemiology and Statistics, Université de Paris, INSERM U1153, Paris, France (R.P.); Clinical Epidemiology Center, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Hôtel Dieu, Paris, France (R.P.); Institute for Computing and Data Sciences, Sorbonne University, Paris, France (I.T.N.); and Department of Radiology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom (A.G.R.)
| | -
- From the Division of Cancer and Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom (G.J.W., A.G.R.); Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria (G.J.W.); Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Y.D.) and Radiology (E.K., I.T.N.), Sorbonne University, Hôpital Tenon, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France; Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France (A.J.C.); Department of Women's Imaging, Centre Hospitalier de Valenciennes, Valenciennes, France (E.P.); Centre of Research Epidemiology and Statistics, Université de Paris, INSERM U1153, Paris, France (R.P.); Clinical Epidemiology Center, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Hôtel Dieu, Paris, France (R.P.); Institute for Computing and Data Sciences, Sorbonne University, Paris, France (I.T.N.); and Department of Radiology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom (A.G.R.)
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Abstract
The lack of preclinical models of spontaneous ovarian cancer (OVCA), a fatal gynecological malignancy, is a significant barrier to generating information on early changes indicative of OVCA. In contrast to rodents, laying hens develop OVCA spontaneously, with remarkable similarities to OVCA in women regarding tumor histology, OVCA dissemination, immune responses, and risk factors. These important features of OVCA will be useful to develop an early detection test for OVCA, which would significantly reduce mortality rates; preventive strategies; immunotherapeutics; prevention of resistance to chemotherapeutics; and exploration of gene therapies. A transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) imaging method for imaging of hen ovarian tumors has been developed. Hens can be monitored prospectively by using serum markers, together with TVUS imaging, to detect early-stage OVCA, provided that a panel of serum markers can be established and imaging agents developed. Recent sequencing of the chicken genome will further facilitate the hen model to explore gene therapies against OVCA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Animesh Barua
- Laboratory of Translational Research on Ovarian Cancer, Department of Cell and Molecular Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA;
| | - Janice M Bahr
- Department of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Sadowski EA, Thomassin-Naggara I, Rockall A, Maturen KE, Forstner R, Jha P, Nougaret S, Siegelman ES, Reinhold C. O-RADS MRI Risk Stratification System: Guide for Assessing Adnexal Lesions from the ACR O-RADS Committee. Radiology 2022; 303:35-47. [PMID: 35040672 PMCID: PMC8962917 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.204371] [Citation(s) in RCA: 89] [Impact Index Per Article: 29.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
MRI plays an important role as a secondary test or problem-solving modality in the evaluation of adnexal lesions depicted at US. MRI has increased specificity compared with US, decreasing the number of false-positive diagnoses for malignancy and thereby avoiding unnecessary or over-extensive surgery in patients with benign lesions or borderline tumors, while women with possible malignancies can be expeditiously referred for oncologic surgical evaluation. The Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System (O-RADS) MRI Committee is an international collaborative effort formed under the direction of the American College of Radiology and includes a diverse group of experts on adnexal imaging and management who developed the O-RADS MRI risk stratification system. This scoring system assigns a probability of malignancy based on the MRI features of an adnexal lesion and provides information to facilitate optimal patient management. The widespread implementation of a codified reporting system will lead to improved interpretation agreement and standardized communication between radiologists and referring physicians. In addition, it will allow for high-quality multi-institutional collaborations-an important unmet need that has hampered the performance of high-quality research in this area in the past. This article provides guidelines on using the O-RADS MRI risk stratification system in clinical practice, as well as in the educational and research settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth A Sadowski
- From the Departments of Radiology and Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 600 Highland Ave, E3/372 Madison, WI 53792-3252 (E.A.S.); Service d'Imageries Radiologiques et Interventionnelles Spécialisées (IRIS), Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France (I.T.N.); Division of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Campus, London, England (A.R.); Departments of Radiology and Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (K.E.M.); Department of Radiology, Universitätsklinikum Salzburg, PMU Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria (R.F.); Department of Radiology, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (P.J.); Department of Radiology, IRCM INSERM, U1194 SIRIC, Montpellier, France (S.N.); Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (E.S.S.); Department of Radiology, McGill University Health Centre, McGill University, Montreal, Canada (C.R.); and Augmented Intelligence & Precision Health Laboratory, Research Institute of McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada (C.R.)
| | - Isabelle Thomassin-Naggara
- From the Departments of Radiology and Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 600 Highland Ave, E3/372 Madison, WI 53792-3252 (E.A.S.); Service d'Imageries Radiologiques et Interventionnelles Spécialisées (IRIS), Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France (I.T.N.); Division of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Campus, London, England (A.R.); Departments of Radiology and Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (K.E.M.); Department of Radiology, Universitätsklinikum Salzburg, PMU Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria (R.F.); Department of Radiology, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (P.J.); Department of Radiology, IRCM INSERM, U1194 SIRIC, Montpellier, France (S.N.); Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (E.S.S.); Department of Radiology, McGill University Health Centre, McGill University, Montreal, Canada (C.R.); and Augmented Intelligence & Precision Health Laboratory, Research Institute of McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada (C.R.)
| | - Andrea Rockall
- From the Departments of Radiology and Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 600 Highland Ave, E3/372 Madison, WI 53792-3252 (E.A.S.); Service d'Imageries Radiologiques et Interventionnelles Spécialisées (IRIS), Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France (I.T.N.); Division of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Campus, London, England (A.R.); Departments of Radiology and Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (K.E.M.); Department of Radiology, Universitätsklinikum Salzburg, PMU Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria (R.F.); Department of Radiology, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (P.J.); Department of Radiology, IRCM INSERM, U1194 SIRIC, Montpellier, France (S.N.); Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (E.S.S.); Department of Radiology, McGill University Health Centre, McGill University, Montreal, Canada (C.R.); and Augmented Intelligence & Precision Health Laboratory, Research Institute of McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada (C.R.)
| | - Katherine E Maturen
- From the Departments of Radiology and Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 600 Highland Ave, E3/372 Madison, WI 53792-3252 (E.A.S.); Service d'Imageries Radiologiques et Interventionnelles Spécialisées (IRIS), Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France (I.T.N.); Division of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Campus, London, England (A.R.); Departments of Radiology and Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (K.E.M.); Department of Radiology, Universitätsklinikum Salzburg, PMU Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria (R.F.); Department of Radiology, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (P.J.); Department of Radiology, IRCM INSERM, U1194 SIRIC, Montpellier, France (S.N.); Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (E.S.S.); Department of Radiology, McGill University Health Centre, McGill University, Montreal, Canada (C.R.); and Augmented Intelligence & Precision Health Laboratory, Research Institute of McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada (C.R.)
| | - Rosemarie Forstner
- From the Departments of Radiology and Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 600 Highland Ave, E3/372 Madison, WI 53792-3252 (E.A.S.); Service d'Imageries Radiologiques et Interventionnelles Spécialisées (IRIS), Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France (I.T.N.); Division of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Campus, London, England (A.R.); Departments of Radiology and Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (K.E.M.); Department of Radiology, Universitätsklinikum Salzburg, PMU Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria (R.F.); Department of Radiology, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (P.J.); Department of Radiology, IRCM INSERM, U1194 SIRIC, Montpellier, France (S.N.); Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (E.S.S.); Department of Radiology, McGill University Health Centre, McGill University, Montreal, Canada (C.R.); and Augmented Intelligence & Precision Health Laboratory, Research Institute of McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada (C.R.)
| | - Priyanka Jha
- From the Departments of Radiology and Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 600 Highland Ave, E3/372 Madison, WI 53792-3252 (E.A.S.); Service d'Imageries Radiologiques et Interventionnelles Spécialisées (IRIS), Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France (I.T.N.); Division of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Campus, London, England (A.R.); Departments of Radiology and Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (K.E.M.); Department of Radiology, Universitätsklinikum Salzburg, PMU Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria (R.F.); Department of Radiology, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (P.J.); Department of Radiology, IRCM INSERM, U1194 SIRIC, Montpellier, France (S.N.); Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (E.S.S.); Department of Radiology, McGill University Health Centre, McGill University, Montreal, Canada (C.R.); and Augmented Intelligence & Precision Health Laboratory, Research Institute of McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada (C.R.)
| | - Stephanie Nougaret
- From the Departments of Radiology and Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 600 Highland Ave, E3/372 Madison, WI 53792-3252 (E.A.S.); Service d'Imageries Radiologiques et Interventionnelles Spécialisées (IRIS), Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France (I.T.N.); Division of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Campus, London, England (A.R.); Departments of Radiology and Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (K.E.M.); Department of Radiology, Universitätsklinikum Salzburg, PMU Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria (R.F.); Department of Radiology, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (P.J.); Department of Radiology, IRCM INSERM, U1194 SIRIC, Montpellier, France (S.N.); Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (E.S.S.); Department of Radiology, McGill University Health Centre, McGill University, Montreal, Canada (C.R.); and Augmented Intelligence & Precision Health Laboratory, Research Institute of McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada (C.R.)
| | - Evan S Siegelman
- From the Departments of Radiology and Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 600 Highland Ave, E3/372 Madison, WI 53792-3252 (E.A.S.); Service d'Imageries Radiologiques et Interventionnelles Spécialisées (IRIS), Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France (I.T.N.); Division of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Campus, London, England (A.R.); Departments of Radiology and Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (K.E.M.); Department of Radiology, Universitätsklinikum Salzburg, PMU Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria (R.F.); Department of Radiology, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (P.J.); Department of Radiology, IRCM INSERM, U1194 SIRIC, Montpellier, France (S.N.); Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (E.S.S.); Department of Radiology, McGill University Health Centre, McGill University, Montreal, Canada (C.R.); and Augmented Intelligence & Precision Health Laboratory, Research Institute of McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada (C.R.)
| | - Caroline Reinhold
- From the Departments of Radiology and Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 600 Highland Ave, E3/372 Madison, WI 53792-3252 (E.A.S.); Service d'Imageries Radiologiques et Interventionnelles Spécialisées (IRIS), Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France (I.T.N.); Division of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Campus, London, England (A.R.); Departments of Radiology and Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (K.E.M.); Department of Radiology, Universitätsklinikum Salzburg, PMU Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria (R.F.); Department of Radiology, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (P.J.); Department of Radiology, IRCM INSERM, U1194 SIRIC, Montpellier, France (S.N.); Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (E.S.S.); Department of Radiology, McGill University Health Centre, McGill University, Montreal, Canada (C.R.); and Augmented Intelligence & Precision Health Laboratory, Research Institute of McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada (C.R.)
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Ultrasonographic ovarian mass scoring system for predicting malignancy in pregnant women with ovarian mass. Obstet Gynecol Sci 2021; 65:1-13. [PMID: 34902893 PMCID: PMC8784942 DOI: 10.5468/ogs.21212] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2021] [Accepted: 10/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
During routine antenatal ultrasound examinations, an ovarian mass can be found incidentally. In clinical practice, the differential diagnosis between benign and malignant ovarian masses is essential for planning further management. Ultrasound imaging has become the most popular diagnostic tool during pregnancy, with the recent development of ultrasonography. In non-pregnant women, several methods have been used to predict malignant ovarian masses before surgery. The International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) group reported several scoring systems, such as the IOTA simple rules, IOTA logistic regression models, and IOTA assessment of different NEoplasias in the adneXa. Other researchers have also evaluated the malignancy of ovarian masses before surgery using scoring systems such as the Sassone score, pelvic mass score, DePriest score, Lerner score, and Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System. These researchers suggested specific features of ovarian masses that can be used for differential diagnosis, including size, proportion of solid tissue, papillary projections, inner wall structure, locules, wall thickness, septa, echogenicity, acoustic shadows, and presence of ascites. Although these factors can also be measured in pregnant women using ultrasound, only a few studies have applied ovarian scoring systems in pregnant women. In this article, we reviewed various scoring systems for predicting malignant tumors of the ovary and determined whether they can be applied to pregnant women.
Collapse
|
16
|
Eom SY, Rha SE. [Adnexal Masses: Clinical Application of Multiparametric MR Imaging & O-RADS MRI]. TAEHAN YONGSANG UIHAKHOE CHI 2021; 82:1066-1082. [PMID: 36238388 PMCID: PMC9432352 DOI: 10.3348/jksr.2021.0111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2021] [Revised: 07/16/2021] [Accepted: 07/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Incidental adnexal masses considered indeterminate for malignancy are commonly observed on ultrasonography. Multiparametric MRI is the imaging modality of choice for the evaluation of sonographically indeterminate adnexal masses. Conventional MRI enables a confident pathologic diagnosis of various benign lesions due to accurate tissue characterization of fat, blood, fibrous tissue, and solid components. Additionally, functional imaging sequences, including perfusion- and diffusion-weighted imaging, improve the diagnostic efficacy of conventional MRI in differentiating benign from malignant adnexal masses. The ovarian-adnexal reporting and data system (O-RADS) MRI was recently designed to provide consistent interpretations in assigning risk of malignancy to ovarian and other adnexal masses, and to provide a management recommendation for each risk category. In this review, we describe the clinical application of multiparametric MRI for the evaluation of adnexal masses and introduce the O-RADS MRI risk stratification system.
Collapse
|
17
|
Performance of imaging interpretation, intra- and inter-reader agreement for diagnosis of pelvic endometriosis: comparison between an abbreviated and full MRI protocol. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2021; 46:4025-4035. [PMID: 33772612 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-021-03052-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2020] [Revised: 03/03/2021] [Accepted: 03/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare the performance of imaging interpretation, intra- and inter-reader agreement between an abbreviated (aMRI) and full (fMRI) MRI protocol for diagnosis of pelvic endometriosis. METHODS Seventy consecutive fMRI exams performed under suspicion of pelvic endometriosis were selected. Four radiologists (Rd) (1-10 years experience) independently evaluated presence/absence of endometriosis at 9 anatomic sites (AS). The readers evaluated aMRI (coronal T2 TSE volumetric images and axial T1 GRE fat-sat without contrast, extracted from fMRI) and fMRI protocols randomly, with at least 4 weeks interval between readings. The degree of confidence for diagnosis at each AS was evaluated with a 1-3 Likert Scale (1: low; 3: high). Intra- and inter-reader agreement between protocols were evaluated by kappa statistics and took reading experience into account. The gold standard for assessing the performance of imaging interpretation (sensitivity, specificity and accuracy) used a consensus reading of two other Rd (> 15 years experience). RESULTS There was no significant difference in the accuracy of imaging interpretation between the abbreviated (0.83-0.86) and full (0.83-0.87) protocols (p = 0.15). Intra-reader agreement between protocols ranged from substantial to almost perfect (0.74-0.96). A substantial inter-reader agreement was found for both protocols for readers with similar levels of experience (0.67-0.69) and in the global analysis (0.66 for both protocols). No difference was found in terms of degree of confidence between protocols, for all readers. CONCLUSION An abbreviated MRI protocol for pelvic endometriosis provided an accuracy of interpretation comparable to that of a complete protocol, with similar degrees of confidence and reproducibility, regardless the level of experience.
Collapse
|
18
|
Nougaret S, McCague C, Tibermacine H, Vargas HA, Rizzo S, Sala E. Radiomics and radiogenomics in ovarian cancer: a literature review. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2021; 46:2308-2322. [PMID: 33174120 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-020-02820-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2020] [Revised: 10/01/2020] [Accepted: 10/10/2020] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Ovarian cancer remains one of the most lethal gynecological cancers in the world despite extensive progress in the areas of chemotherapy and surgery. Many studies have postulated that this is because of the profound heterogeneity that underpins response to therapy and prognosis. Standard imaging evaluation using CT or MRI does not take into account this tumoral heterogeneity especially in advanced stages with peritoneal carcinomatosis. As such, newly emergent fields in the assessment of tumor heterogeneity have been proposed using radiomics to evaluate the whole tumor burden heterogeneity as opposed to single biopsy sampling. This review provides an overview of radiomics, radiogenomics, and proteomics and examines the use of these newly emergent fields in assessing tumor heterogeneity and its implications in ovarian cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Nougaret
- IRCM, Montpellier Cancer Research Institute, INSERM, U1194, University of Montpellier, 208 Ave des Apothicaires, 34295, Montpellier, France. .,Department of Radiology, Montpellier Cancer institute, 208 Ave des Apothicaires, 34295, Montpellier, France.
| | - Cathal McCague
- Department of Radiology, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Box 218, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Hichem Tibermacine
- IRCM, Montpellier Cancer Research Institute, INSERM, U1194, University of Montpellier, 208 Ave des Apothicaires, 34295, Montpellier, France.,Department of Radiology, Montpellier Cancer institute, 208 Ave des Apothicaires, 34295, Montpellier, France
| | - Hebert Alberto Vargas
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Stefania Rizzo
- Istituto di Imaging della Svizzera Italiana (IIMSI), Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), Via Tesserete 46, 6900, Lugano, CH, Switzerland.,Facoltà di Scienze Biomediche, Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, CH, Switzerland
| | - E Sala
- Department of Radiology, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Box 218, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Hottat NA, Van Pachterbeke C, Vanden Houte K, Denolin V, Jani JC, Cannie MM. Magnetic resonance scoring system for assessment of adnexal masses: added value of diffusion-weighted imaging including apparent diffusion coefficient map. ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY 2021; 57:478-487. [PMID: 32438461 DOI: 10.1002/uog.22090] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2019] [Revised: 05/01/2020] [Accepted: 05/07/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To validate prospectively the ADNEX magnetic resonance (MR) scoring system to assess adnexal masses and to evaluate a new, modified ADNEX MR scoring system that incorporates diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) with apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) mapping. METHODS Between January 2015 and September 2018, 323 consecutive women with adnexal masses diagnosed on transvaginal ultrasound (TVS) underwent standardized MR imaging (MRI) including diffusion and dynamic contrast-enhanced sequences. Of these, 131 underwent subsequent surgery. For interpretation of the MRI examinations, we applied the five-category ADNEX MR scoring system, along with a modified scoring system including DWI with ADC mapping. For both scoring systems, a score was given for all adnexal masses. Histological diagnosis was considered as the gold standard and lesions were classified as benign or malignant. The difference between the predictive values for diagnosing malignancy of the classical and modified scoring systems was assessed on the basis of the areas under the receiver-operating-characteristics (AUC) curves. The sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing malignancy of each score were also calculated. RESULTS Among the 131 women with adnexal mass(es) diagnosed on TVS who underwent MRI and subsequent surgery, the surgery revealed 161 adnexal masses in 126 women; five women had no mass. Histological examination confirmed 161 adnexal masses, of which all had been detected on MRI: 32 malignant tumors, 15 borderline tumors, which were classified as part of the malignant group (n = 47), and 114 benign lesions. The AUC for prediction of a malignant lesion was 0.938 (95% CI, 0.902-0.975) using the classical ADNEX MR scoring system and 0.974 (95% CI, 0.953-0.996) using the modified scoring system. Pairwise comparison of these AUCs revealed a significant difference (P = 0.0032). The sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing malignancy with an ADNEX MR score of 4 or more were 95.5% and 86.6%, respectively, using the classic scoring system, and 95.7% and 93.3%, respectively, using the modified scoring system. CONCLUSION DWI with ADC mapping could be integrated into the ADNEX MR scoring system to improve specificity, thereby potentially optimizing clinical management by avoiding unnecessary surgery. © 2020 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N A Hottat
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Brugmann, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
- Department of Radiology, UZ Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - C Van Pachterbeke
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Brugmann, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - K Vanden Houte
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital Brugmann, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - V Denolin
- Siemens Healthineers, Beersel, Belgium
| | - J C Jani
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Brugmann, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - M M Cannie
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Brugmann, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
- Department of Radiology, UZ Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
The diagnostic value of magnetic resonance imaging in differentiating benign and malignant pediatric ovarian tumors. Pediatr Radiol 2021; 51:427-434. [PMID: 33185738 PMCID: PMC7897193 DOI: 10.1007/s00247-020-04871-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2020] [Revised: 07/21/2020] [Accepted: 10/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The diagnostic workup of ovarian tumors in children and adolescents is challenging because preserving fertility, in addition to oncological safety, is of particular importance in this population. Therefore, a thorough preoperative assessment of ovarian tumors is required. OBJECTIVE To investigate the diagnostic value of MR imaging in differentiating benign from malignant ovarian tumors in children and adolescents. MATERIALS AND METHODS We conducted a retrospective study of all children and adolescents age <18 years who underwent MR imaging of ovarian tumors during 2014-2019 at a pediatric specialty center. Two radiologists reviewed all MR imaging. We used pathology reports to define the histological diagnosis. RESULTS We included 30 girls who underwent MR imaging for an ovarian tumor. Signs indicative for malignancy were tumors with a diameter ≥8 cm, with areas of contrast enhancement, irregular margins, extracapsular tumor growth, and ascites. All benign and malignant ovarian tumors were correctly identified by the radiologists. CONCLUSION The diagnostic utility of MR imaging in classifying ovarian tumors in children and adolescents as benign or malignant is promising and might aid in defining the indication for ovarian-sparing versus non-ovarian-sparing surgery. We recommend evaluating these tumors with MR imaging prior to deciding on surgical treatment.
Collapse
|
21
|
Elsherif SB, Zheng S, Ganeshan D, Iyer R, Wei W, Bhosale PR. Does dual-energy CT differentiate benign and malignant ovarian tumours? Clin Radiol 2020; 75:606-614. [PMID: 32252992 DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2020.03.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2019] [Accepted: 03/09/2020] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
AIM To assess the ability of dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) to distinguish benign from malignant ovarian tumours (OTs). MATERIALS AND METHODS Following approval of the institutional review board, the institutional database was mined for treatment-naive patients who underwent primary cytoreduction for OT. Thirty-seven patients were included and divided into those with benign OTs (n = 11) and malignant OTs (n = 26), including high-grade (n = 20) and low-grade (n = 6) malignant OTs. Advanced processing and region of interest delineation on the ovarian mass were performed using the preoperative staging DECT examination using the Advantage Workstation. The pixel-level data of the CT attenuation values at 50, 70, and 120 keV and the effective atomic number (Zeff), water content (WC), and iodine content (IC) in the ovarian mass were recorded. The Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to compare CT attenuation data at different voltages, Zeff, and WC and IC levels between benign and malignant OTs and between high- and low-grade malignant OTs. Simple logistic regression was used to correlate the imaging characteristics with malignant status and grade. RESULTS Malignant OTs had significantly higher Zeff and IC compared with benign OTs. The threshold values for the diagnosis of malignant OT were IC≥9.74 (100 μg/cm3) with 81% sensitivity and 73% specificity and Zeff ≥8.16 with 85% sensitivity and 73% specificity. High-grade OTs had significantly higher WC compared with low-grade OTs, and a threshold of ≥1,013.92 mg/cm3 differentiated them with 80% sensitivity and 83% specificity. CONCLUSION DECT may be a tool to help distinguish malignant and benign OTs and predict tumour grade.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S B Elsherif
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler St., Houston, TX 77030, USA.
| | - S Zheng
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston McGovern Medical School, MSB 2.130B, 6431 Fannin Street, Houston, TX 77030 Houston, Texas, USA
| | - D Ganeshan
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler St., Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - R Iyer
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler St., Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - W Wei
- Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave., Cleveland, OH 44195, USA; Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler St., Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - P R Bhosale
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler St., Houston, TX 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Amado Cabana S, Gallego Ojea JC, Félez Carballada M. Usefulness of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in characterizing ovarian tumors classified as indeterminate at ultrasonography. RADIOLOGIA 2020; 64:S0033-8338(20)30073-4. [PMID: 32650993 DOI: 10.1016/j.rx.2020.05.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2020] [Revised: 05/11/2020] [Accepted: 05/20/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To determine whether there is a significant relationship between the shape of the time-intensity curve on dynamic gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of ovarian tumors classified as indeterminate at ultrasonography and the type of lesion (benign, borderline, or malignant) to enable an accurate presurgical diagnosis. MATERIAL AND METHODS We used dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI to study 68 ovarian tumors that were classified as indeterminate at ultrasonography. We included only cases for which a definitive diagnosis (histologic diagnosis or ≥1 year stability on imaging tests) was available. Each case was classified as benign, borderline, or malignant. To analyze the MRI studies, we marked regions of interest in the lesion and in the myometrium (as a reference). We obtained a curve defined by the relation between the intensity of enhancement and time and classified each tumor according to four predefined curve types. We also analyzed semiquantitative parameters. Finally, we compared the results for each of the three groups of tumors. RESULTS We found significant associations (p <0.001) between the curves without early enhancement and benign and borderline lesions as well as between the curves with early enhancement and malignant lesions. Malignant lesions were significantly associated with the semiquantitative enhancement parameters: maximum (p=0.002), maximum relative (p=0.006), and relative (p=0.018). CONCLUSIONS In ovarian tumors classified as indeterminate at ultrasonography, dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI can be useful for classification as benign, borderline, or malignant because the malignant lesions are significantly associated with early enhancement curves.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Amado Cabana
- Servicio de Radiodiagnóstico, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Ferrol, Ferrol, A Coruña, España.
| | - J C Gallego Ojea
- Servicio de Radiodiagnóstico, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Ferrol, Ferrol, A Coruña, España
| | - M Félez Carballada
- Servicio de Radiodiagnóstico, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Ferrol, Ferrol, A Coruña, España
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Mokry T, Mlynarska-Bujny A, Kuder TA, Hasse FC, Hog R, Wallwiener M, Dinkic C, Brucker J, Sinn P, Gnirs R, Kauczor HU, Schlemmer HP, Rom J, Bickelhaupt S. Ultra-High- b-Value Kurtosis Imaging for Noninvasive Tissue Characterization of Ovarian Lesions. Radiology 2020; 296:358-369. [PMID: 32544033 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2020191700] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
Background MRI with contrast material enhancement is the imaging modality of choice to evaluate sonographically indeterminate adnexal masses. The role of diffusion-weighted MRI, however, remains controversial. Purpose To evaluate the diagnostic performance of ultra-high-b-value diffusion kurtosis MRI in discriminating benign and malignant ovarian lesions. Materials and Methods This prospective cohort study evaluated consecutive women with sonographically indeterminate adnexal masses between November 2016 and December 2018. MRI at 3.0 T was performed, including diffusion-weighted MRI (b values of 0-2000 sec/mm2). Lesions were segmented on b of 1500 sec/mm2 by two readers in consensus and an additional independent reader by using full-lesion segmentations on a single transversal slice. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) calculation and kurtosis fitting were performed. Differences in ADC, kurtosis-derived ADC (Dapp), and apparent kurtosis coefficient (Kapp) between malignant and benign lesions were assessed by using a logistic mixed model. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for ADC, Dapp, and Kapp to discriminate malignant from benign lesions was calculated, as was specificity at a sensitivity level of 100%. Results from two independent reads were compared. Histopathologic analysis served as the reference standard. Results A total of 79 ovarian lesions in 58 women (mean age ± standard deviation, 48 years ± 14) were evaluated. Sixty-two (78%) lesions showed benign and 17 (22%) lesions showed malignant histologic findings. ADC and Dapp were lower and Kapp was higher in malignant lesions: median ADC, Dapp, and Kapp were 0.74 µm2/msec (range, 0.52-1.44 µm2/msec), 0.98 µm2/msec (range, 0.63-2.12 µm2/msec), and 1.01 (range, 0.69-1.30) for malignant lesions, and 1.13 µm2/msec (range, 0.35-2.63 µm2/msec), 1.45 µm2/msec (range, 0.44-3.34 µm2/msec), and 0.65 (range, 0.44-1.43) for benign lesions (P values of .01, .02, < .001, respectively). AUC for Kapp of 0.85 (95% confidence interval: 0.77, 0.94) was higher than was AUC from ADC of 0.78 (95% confidence interval: 0.67, 0.89; P = .047). Conclusion Diffusion-weighted MRI by using quantitative kurtosis variables is superior to apparent diffusion coefficient values in discriminating benign and malignant ovarian lesions and might be of future help in clinical practice, especially in patients with contraindication to contrast media application. © RSNA, 2020 Online supplemental material is available for this article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Theresa Mokry
- From the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Clinic of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany (T.M., F.C.H., H.U.K.); Department of Radiology (T.M., A.M.B., R.H., R.G., H.P.S., S.B.) and Department of Medical Physics in Radiology (A.M.B., T.A.K.), German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany; Medical Faculty Heidelberg, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany (A.M.B.); Hospital for General Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (M.W., C.D., J.B.); Department of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany (P.S.); Hospital for General Obstetrics and Gynecology, Frankfurt Hoechst, Germany (J.R.); Junior Group Medical Imaging and Radiology-Cancer Prevention, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany (R.H., S.B.); and Institute of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany (S.B.)
| | - Anna Mlynarska-Bujny
- From the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Clinic of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany (T.M., F.C.H., H.U.K.); Department of Radiology (T.M., A.M.B., R.H., R.G., H.P.S., S.B.) and Department of Medical Physics in Radiology (A.M.B., T.A.K.), German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany; Medical Faculty Heidelberg, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany (A.M.B.); Hospital for General Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (M.W., C.D., J.B.); Department of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany (P.S.); Hospital for General Obstetrics and Gynecology, Frankfurt Hoechst, Germany (J.R.); Junior Group Medical Imaging and Radiology-Cancer Prevention, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany (R.H., S.B.); and Institute of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany (S.B.)
| | - Tristan Anselm Kuder
- From the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Clinic of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany (T.M., F.C.H., H.U.K.); Department of Radiology (T.M., A.M.B., R.H., R.G., H.P.S., S.B.) and Department of Medical Physics in Radiology (A.M.B., T.A.K.), German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany; Medical Faculty Heidelberg, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany (A.M.B.); Hospital for General Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (M.W., C.D., J.B.); Department of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany (P.S.); Hospital for General Obstetrics and Gynecology, Frankfurt Hoechst, Germany (J.R.); Junior Group Medical Imaging and Radiology-Cancer Prevention, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany (R.H., S.B.); and Institute of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany (S.B.)
| | - Felix Christian Hasse
- From the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Clinic of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany (T.M., F.C.H., H.U.K.); Department of Radiology (T.M., A.M.B., R.H., R.G., H.P.S., S.B.) and Department of Medical Physics in Radiology (A.M.B., T.A.K.), German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany; Medical Faculty Heidelberg, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany (A.M.B.); Hospital for General Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (M.W., C.D., J.B.); Department of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany (P.S.); Hospital for General Obstetrics and Gynecology, Frankfurt Hoechst, Germany (J.R.); Junior Group Medical Imaging and Radiology-Cancer Prevention, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany (R.H., S.B.); and Institute of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany (S.B.)
| | - Robert Hog
- From the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Clinic of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany (T.M., F.C.H., H.U.K.); Department of Radiology (T.M., A.M.B., R.H., R.G., H.P.S., S.B.) and Department of Medical Physics in Radiology (A.M.B., T.A.K.), German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany; Medical Faculty Heidelberg, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany (A.M.B.); Hospital for General Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (M.W., C.D., J.B.); Department of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany (P.S.); Hospital for General Obstetrics and Gynecology, Frankfurt Hoechst, Germany (J.R.); Junior Group Medical Imaging and Radiology-Cancer Prevention, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany (R.H., S.B.); and Institute of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany (S.B.)
| | - Markus Wallwiener
- From the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Clinic of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany (T.M., F.C.H., H.U.K.); Department of Radiology (T.M., A.M.B., R.H., R.G., H.P.S., S.B.) and Department of Medical Physics in Radiology (A.M.B., T.A.K.), German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany; Medical Faculty Heidelberg, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany (A.M.B.); Hospital for General Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (M.W., C.D., J.B.); Department of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany (P.S.); Hospital for General Obstetrics and Gynecology, Frankfurt Hoechst, Germany (J.R.); Junior Group Medical Imaging and Radiology-Cancer Prevention, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany (R.H., S.B.); and Institute of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany (S.B.)
| | - Christine Dinkic
- From the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Clinic of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany (T.M., F.C.H., H.U.K.); Department of Radiology (T.M., A.M.B., R.H., R.G., H.P.S., S.B.) and Department of Medical Physics in Radiology (A.M.B., T.A.K.), German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany; Medical Faculty Heidelberg, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany (A.M.B.); Hospital for General Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (M.W., C.D., J.B.); Department of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany (P.S.); Hospital for General Obstetrics and Gynecology, Frankfurt Hoechst, Germany (J.R.); Junior Group Medical Imaging and Radiology-Cancer Prevention, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany (R.H., S.B.); and Institute of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany (S.B.)
| | - Janina Brucker
- From the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Clinic of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany (T.M., F.C.H., H.U.K.); Department of Radiology (T.M., A.M.B., R.H., R.G., H.P.S., S.B.) and Department of Medical Physics in Radiology (A.M.B., T.A.K.), German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany; Medical Faculty Heidelberg, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany (A.M.B.); Hospital for General Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (M.W., C.D., J.B.); Department of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany (P.S.); Hospital for General Obstetrics and Gynecology, Frankfurt Hoechst, Germany (J.R.); Junior Group Medical Imaging and Radiology-Cancer Prevention, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany (R.H., S.B.); and Institute of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany (S.B.)
| | - Peter Sinn
- From the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Clinic of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany (T.M., F.C.H., H.U.K.); Department of Radiology (T.M., A.M.B., R.H., R.G., H.P.S., S.B.) and Department of Medical Physics in Radiology (A.M.B., T.A.K.), German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany; Medical Faculty Heidelberg, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany (A.M.B.); Hospital for General Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (M.W., C.D., J.B.); Department of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany (P.S.); Hospital for General Obstetrics and Gynecology, Frankfurt Hoechst, Germany (J.R.); Junior Group Medical Imaging and Radiology-Cancer Prevention, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany (R.H., S.B.); and Institute of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany (S.B.)
| | - Regula Gnirs
- From the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Clinic of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany (T.M., F.C.H., H.U.K.); Department of Radiology (T.M., A.M.B., R.H., R.G., H.P.S., S.B.) and Department of Medical Physics in Radiology (A.M.B., T.A.K.), German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany; Medical Faculty Heidelberg, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany (A.M.B.); Hospital for General Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (M.W., C.D., J.B.); Department of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany (P.S.); Hospital for General Obstetrics and Gynecology, Frankfurt Hoechst, Germany (J.R.); Junior Group Medical Imaging and Radiology-Cancer Prevention, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany (R.H., S.B.); and Institute of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany (S.B.)
| | - Hans-Ulrich Kauczor
- From the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Clinic of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany (T.M., F.C.H., H.U.K.); Department of Radiology (T.M., A.M.B., R.H., R.G., H.P.S., S.B.) and Department of Medical Physics in Radiology (A.M.B., T.A.K.), German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany; Medical Faculty Heidelberg, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany (A.M.B.); Hospital for General Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (M.W., C.D., J.B.); Department of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany (P.S.); Hospital for General Obstetrics and Gynecology, Frankfurt Hoechst, Germany (J.R.); Junior Group Medical Imaging and Radiology-Cancer Prevention, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany (R.H., S.B.); and Institute of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany (S.B.)
| | - Heinz-Peter Schlemmer
- From the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Clinic of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany (T.M., F.C.H., H.U.K.); Department of Radiology (T.M., A.M.B., R.H., R.G., H.P.S., S.B.) and Department of Medical Physics in Radiology (A.M.B., T.A.K.), German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany; Medical Faculty Heidelberg, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany (A.M.B.); Hospital for General Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (M.W., C.D., J.B.); Department of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany (P.S.); Hospital for General Obstetrics and Gynecology, Frankfurt Hoechst, Germany (J.R.); Junior Group Medical Imaging and Radiology-Cancer Prevention, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany (R.H., S.B.); and Institute of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany (S.B.)
| | - Joachim Rom
- From the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Clinic of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany (T.M., F.C.H., H.U.K.); Department of Radiology (T.M., A.M.B., R.H., R.G., H.P.S., S.B.) and Department of Medical Physics in Radiology (A.M.B., T.A.K.), German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany; Medical Faculty Heidelberg, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany (A.M.B.); Hospital for General Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (M.W., C.D., J.B.); Department of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany (P.S.); Hospital for General Obstetrics and Gynecology, Frankfurt Hoechst, Germany (J.R.); Junior Group Medical Imaging and Radiology-Cancer Prevention, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany (R.H., S.B.); and Institute of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany (S.B.)
| | - Sebastian Bickelhaupt
- From the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Clinic of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany (T.M., F.C.H., H.U.K.); Department of Radiology (T.M., A.M.B., R.H., R.G., H.P.S., S.B.) and Department of Medical Physics in Radiology (A.M.B., T.A.K.), German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany; Medical Faculty Heidelberg, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany (A.M.B.); Hospital for General Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (M.W., C.D., J.B.); Department of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany (P.S.); Hospital for General Obstetrics and Gynecology, Frankfurt Hoechst, Germany (J.R.); Junior Group Medical Imaging and Radiology-Cancer Prevention, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany (R.H., S.B.); and Institute of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany (S.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Nougaret S, Nikolovski I, Paroder V, Vargas HA, Sala E, Carrere S, Tetreau R, Hoeffel C, Forstner R, Lakhman Y. MRI of Tumors and Tumor Mimics in the Female Pelvis: Anatomic Pelvic Space-based Approach. Radiographics 2020; 39:1205-1229. [PMID: 31283453 DOI: 10.1148/rg.2019180173] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Pelvic masses can present a diagnostic challenge owing to the difficulty in assessing their origin and the overlap in imaging features. The majority of pelvic tumors arise from gastrointestinal or genitourinary organs, with less common sites of origin including the connective tissues, nerves, and lymphovascular structures. Lesion evaluation usually starts with clinical assessment followed by imaging, or the lesion may be an incidental finding at imaging performed for other clinical indications. Since accurate diagnosis is essential for optimal management, imaging is useful for suggesting the correct diagnosis or narrowing the differential possibilities and distinguishing tumors from their mimics. Some masses may require histologic confirmation of the diagnosis with biopsy and/or up-front surgical resection. In this case, imaging is essential for presurgical planning to assess mass size and location, evaluate the relationship to adjacent pelvic structures, and narrow differential possibilities. Pelvic US is often the first imaging modality performed in women with pelvic symptoms. While US is often useful to detect a pelvic mass, it has significant limitations in assessing masses located deep in the pelvis or near gas-filled organs. CT also has limited value in the pelvis owing to its inferior soft-tissue contrast. MRI is frequently the optimal imaging modality, as it offers both multiplanar capability and excellent soft-tissue contrast. This article highlights the normal anatomy of the pelvic spaces in the female pelvis and focuses on MRI features of common tumors and tumor mimics that arise in these spaces. It provides an interpretative algorithm for approaching an unknown pelvic lesion at MRI. It also discusses surgical management, emphasizing the value of MRI as a road map to surgery and highlighting anatomic locations where surgical resection may present a challenge. ©RSNA, 2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie Nougaret
- From the Montpellier Cancer Research Institute (IRCM), INSERM U1194, Montpellier, France (S.N.); Departments of Radiology (S.N., R.T.) and Surgery (S.C.), Montpellier Cancer Institute, University of Montpellier, 208 Ave des Apothicaires, Montpellier 34298, France; Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (I.N., V.P., H.A.V., Y.L.); Department of Radiology, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, England (E.S.); Department of Radiology, CHU Reims, Reims, France (C.H.); CReSTIC, URCA, Reims University, Reims, France (C.H.); and Department of Radiology, Universitätsklinikum, PMU, Salzburg, Austria (R.F.)
| | - Ines Nikolovski
- From the Montpellier Cancer Research Institute (IRCM), INSERM U1194, Montpellier, France (S.N.); Departments of Radiology (S.N., R.T.) and Surgery (S.C.), Montpellier Cancer Institute, University of Montpellier, 208 Ave des Apothicaires, Montpellier 34298, France; Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (I.N., V.P., H.A.V., Y.L.); Department of Radiology, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, England (E.S.); Department of Radiology, CHU Reims, Reims, France (C.H.); CReSTIC, URCA, Reims University, Reims, France (C.H.); and Department of Radiology, Universitätsklinikum, PMU, Salzburg, Austria (R.F.)
| | - Viktoriya Paroder
- From the Montpellier Cancer Research Institute (IRCM), INSERM U1194, Montpellier, France (S.N.); Departments of Radiology (S.N., R.T.) and Surgery (S.C.), Montpellier Cancer Institute, University of Montpellier, 208 Ave des Apothicaires, Montpellier 34298, France; Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (I.N., V.P., H.A.V., Y.L.); Department of Radiology, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, England (E.S.); Department of Radiology, CHU Reims, Reims, France (C.H.); CReSTIC, URCA, Reims University, Reims, France (C.H.); and Department of Radiology, Universitätsklinikum, PMU, Salzburg, Austria (R.F.)
| | - Hebert A Vargas
- From the Montpellier Cancer Research Institute (IRCM), INSERM U1194, Montpellier, France (S.N.); Departments of Radiology (S.N., R.T.) and Surgery (S.C.), Montpellier Cancer Institute, University of Montpellier, 208 Ave des Apothicaires, Montpellier 34298, France; Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (I.N., V.P., H.A.V., Y.L.); Department of Radiology, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, England (E.S.); Department of Radiology, CHU Reims, Reims, France (C.H.); CReSTIC, URCA, Reims University, Reims, France (C.H.); and Department of Radiology, Universitätsklinikum, PMU, Salzburg, Austria (R.F.)
| | - Evis Sala
- From the Montpellier Cancer Research Institute (IRCM), INSERM U1194, Montpellier, France (S.N.); Departments of Radiology (S.N., R.T.) and Surgery (S.C.), Montpellier Cancer Institute, University of Montpellier, 208 Ave des Apothicaires, Montpellier 34298, France; Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (I.N., V.P., H.A.V., Y.L.); Department of Radiology, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, England (E.S.); Department of Radiology, CHU Reims, Reims, France (C.H.); CReSTIC, URCA, Reims University, Reims, France (C.H.); and Department of Radiology, Universitätsklinikum, PMU, Salzburg, Austria (R.F.)
| | - Sebastien Carrere
- From the Montpellier Cancer Research Institute (IRCM), INSERM U1194, Montpellier, France (S.N.); Departments of Radiology (S.N., R.T.) and Surgery (S.C.), Montpellier Cancer Institute, University of Montpellier, 208 Ave des Apothicaires, Montpellier 34298, France; Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (I.N., V.P., H.A.V., Y.L.); Department of Radiology, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, England (E.S.); Department of Radiology, CHU Reims, Reims, France (C.H.); CReSTIC, URCA, Reims University, Reims, France (C.H.); and Department of Radiology, Universitätsklinikum, PMU, Salzburg, Austria (R.F.)
| | - Raphael Tetreau
- From the Montpellier Cancer Research Institute (IRCM), INSERM U1194, Montpellier, France (S.N.); Departments of Radiology (S.N., R.T.) and Surgery (S.C.), Montpellier Cancer Institute, University of Montpellier, 208 Ave des Apothicaires, Montpellier 34298, France; Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (I.N., V.P., H.A.V., Y.L.); Department of Radiology, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, England (E.S.); Department of Radiology, CHU Reims, Reims, France (C.H.); CReSTIC, URCA, Reims University, Reims, France (C.H.); and Department of Radiology, Universitätsklinikum, PMU, Salzburg, Austria (R.F.)
| | - Christine Hoeffel
- From the Montpellier Cancer Research Institute (IRCM), INSERM U1194, Montpellier, France (S.N.); Departments of Radiology (S.N., R.T.) and Surgery (S.C.), Montpellier Cancer Institute, University of Montpellier, 208 Ave des Apothicaires, Montpellier 34298, France; Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (I.N., V.P., H.A.V., Y.L.); Department of Radiology, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, England (E.S.); Department of Radiology, CHU Reims, Reims, France (C.H.); CReSTIC, URCA, Reims University, Reims, France (C.H.); and Department of Radiology, Universitätsklinikum, PMU, Salzburg, Austria (R.F.)
| | - Rosemarie Forstner
- From the Montpellier Cancer Research Institute (IRCM), INSERM U1194, Montpellier, France (S.N.); Departments of Radiology (S.N., R.T.) and Surgery (S.C.), Montpellier Cancer Institute, University of Montpellier, 208 Ave des Apothicaires, Montpellier 34298, France; Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (I.N., V.P., H.A.V., Y.L.); Department of Radiology, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, England (E.S.); Department of Radiology, CHU Reims, Reims, France (C.H.); CReSTIC, URCA, Reims University, Reims, France (C.H.); and Department of Radiology, Universitätsklinikum, PMU, Salzburg, Austria (R.F.)
| | - Yulia Lakhman
- From the Montpellier Cancer Research Institute (IRCM), INSERM U1194, Montpellier, France (S.N.); Departments of Radiology (S.N., R.T.) and Surgery (S.C.), Montpellier Cancer Institute, University of Montpellier, 208 Ave des Apothicaires, Montpellier 34298, France; Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (I.N., V.P., H.A.V., Y.L.); Department of Radiology, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, England (E.S.); Department of Radiology, CHU Reims, Reims, France (C.H.); CReSTIC, URCA, Reims University, Reims, France (C.H.); and Department of Radiology, Universitätsklinikum, PMU, Salzburg, Austria (R.F.)
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Delaney LJ, Machado P, Torkzaban M, Lyshchik A, Wessner CE, Kim C, Rosenblum N, Richard S, Wallace K, Forsberg F. Characterization of Adnexal Masses Using Contrast-Enhanced Subharmonic Imaging: A Pilot Study. JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE : OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE 2020; 39:977-985. [PMID: 31769529 PMCID: PMC7174081 DOI: 10.1002/jum.15183] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2019] [Revised: 10/14/2019] [Accepted: 10/31/2019] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This pilot study evaluated whether contrast-enhanced subharmonic imaging (SHI) could be used to characterize adnexal masses before surgical intervention. METHODS Ten women (with 12 lesions) scheduled for surgery of an ovarian mass underwent an SHI examination of their adnexal region using a modified LOGIQ E9 scanner (GE Healthcare, Waukesha, WI) with an endocavitary transducer, in which digital clips were acquired by pulse destruction-replenishment SHI across the lesions. Time-intensity curves were created offline to quantitatively evaluate SHI parameters (fractional tumor perfusion, peak contrast intensity, time to peak contrast enhancement, and area under the time-intensity curve), which were compared to pathologic characterizations of the lesions. RESULTS Of the 12 masses, 8 were benign, and 4 were malignant. A qualitative analysis of the SHI images by an experienced radiologist resulted in diagnostic accuracy of 70%, compared to 56% without contrast, whereas an inexperienced radiologist improved from 50% to 58% accuracy, demonstrating the benefit of SHI. A quantitative analysis of SHI parameters produced diagnostic accuracy as high as 81%. Peak contrast intensity was significantly greater in malignant than benign masses (mean ± SD, 0.109 ± 0.088 versus 0.046 ± 0.030 arbitrary units; P = .046). Malignant masses also showed significantly greater perfusion than benign masses (24.79% ± 25.34% versus 7.62% ± 6.50%; P = .045). When the radiologist reads were combined with the most predictive quantitative SHI parameter (percent perfusion), diagnostic accuracy improved to 84% for the experienced radiologist and 96% for the novice radiologist. CONCLUSIONS Results indicate that SHI for presurgical characterization of adnexal masses may improve the determination of malignancy and diagnostic accuracy, albeit based on a small sample size.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren J Delaney
- Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Priscilla Machado
- Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Mehnoosh Torkzaban
- Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Andrej Lyshchik
- Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Corinne E Wessner
- Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Christine Kim
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Norman Rosenblum
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Scott Richard
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | - Flemming Forsberg
- Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Differentiation between benign and malignant ovarian masses using multiparametric MRI. Diagn Interv Imaging 2020; 101:147-155. [DOI: 10.1016/j.diii.2020.01.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2019] [Revised: 01/05/2020] [Accepted: 01/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
|
27
|
Evaluation of adnexal tumours in the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis system in reference to histopathological results. MENOPAUSE REVIEW 2020; 18:141-145. [PMID: 31975980 PMCID: PMC6970421 DOI: 10.5114/pm.2019.90812] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2019] [Accepted: 11/07/2019] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
Aim of the study To retrospectively evaluate how the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) simple rules used in ultrasound examinations estimate the probability of malignant and benign tumour occurrence in the studied population. Material and methods The study was performed on a group of 425 patients with ovarian tumours operated in the Clinic of Surgical and Oncological Gynecology at the Medical University of Lodz in the years 2014-2015. Adnexal tumours were rated according to IOTA simple rules, classifying them as probably malignant, probably benign, or unclassified. The results of the study were compared with final histopathological results. The statistical analysis was performed using STATISTICA 13 PL with Medical Pack. Results We analysed data on n = 43 (11%) patients with malignant, n = 346 (86%) patients with benign, and n = 12 (3%) patients with borderline tumours, respectively. Malignant tumour patients were significantly older (mean age 61.0 ±11.6 vs. 43.6 ±16.2 years, p< 0.001), had higher BMI (mean 27.3 ±7.0 vs. 25.2 ±5.2, p< 0.05), more pregnancies (median 2 vs. 1, p = 0.001), and higher cancer antigen 125 (CA 125) concentrations (median 251.5 vs. 18.5, p< 0.001) than patients with a benign tumour. Also, they more often suffered from diabetes mellitus (19% vs. 8%, p = 0.02) and arterial hypertension (60% vs. 42%, p< 0.01) than benign tumour patients. Conclusions In our study, IOTA performance in predicting or ruling out a malignant tumour was highly satisfactory and similar to that of CA 125. Both the methods may be complementary and used to assess the risk of malignant vs. benign ovarian neoplasm, although the context of other clinical variables may also be important.
Collapse
|
28
|
Korhonen KE, Pantel AR, Mankoff DA. 18F-FDG-PET/CT in Breast and Gynecologic Cancer. Clin Nucl Med 2020. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-39457-8_20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
29
|
Tonolini M, Foti PV, Costanzo V, Mammino L, Palmucci S, Cianci A, Ettorre GC, Basile A. Cross-sectional imaging of acute gynaecologic disorders: CT and MRI findings with differential diagnosis-part I: corpus luteum and haemorrhagic ovarian cysts, genital causes of haemoperitoneum and adnexal torsion. Insights Imaging 2019; 10:119. [PMID: 31853900 PMCID: PMC6920287 DOI: 10.1186/s13244-019-0808-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2019] [Accepted: 10/18/2019] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Acute gynaecologic disorders are commonly encountered in daily clinical practice of emergency departments (ED) and predominantly occur in reproductive-age women. Since clinical presentation may be nonspecific and physical findings are often inconclusive, imaging is required for a timely and accurate diagnosis. Although ultrasound is the ideal non-invasive first-line technique, nowadays multidetector computed tomography (CT) is extensively used in the ED, particularly when a non-gynaecologic disorder is suspected and differential diagnosis from gastrointestinal and urologic diseases is needed. As a result, CT often provides the first diagnosis of female genital emergencies. If clinical conditions and scanner availability permit, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is superior to CT for further characterisation of gynaecologic abnormalities, due to the excellent soft-tissue contrast, intrinsic multiplanar capabilities and lack of ionising radiation. The purpose of this pictorial review is to provide radiologists with a thorough familiarity with gynaecologic emergencies by illustrating their cross-sectional imaging appearances. The present first section will review the CT and MRI findings of corpus luteum and haemorrhagic ovarian cysts, gynaecologic haemoperitoneum (from either ruptured corpus luteum or ectopic pregnancy) and adnexal torsion, with an emphasis on differential diagnosis. Additionally, comprehensive and time-efficient MRI acquisition protocols are provided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Massimo Tonolini
- Department of Radiology, "Luigi Sacco" University Hospital, Via G.B. Grassi 74, 20157, Milan, Italy.
| | - Pietro Valerio Foti
- Department of Medical Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies, Radiology I Unit, University Hospital "Policlinico-Vittorio Emanuele", Via Santa Sofia 78, 95123, Catania, Italy
| | - Valeria Costanzo
- Department of Medical Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies, Radiology I Unit, University Hospital "Policlinico-Vittorio Emanuele", Via Santa Sofia 78, 95123, Catania, Italy
| | - Luca Mammino
- Department of Medical Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies, Radiology I Unit, University Hospital "Policlinico-Vittorio Emanuele", Via Santa Sofia 78, 95123, Catania, Italy
| | - Stefano Palmucci
- Department of Medical Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies, Radiology I Unit, University Hospital "Policlinico-Vittorio Emanuele", Via Santa Sofia 78, 95123, Catania, Italy
| | - Antonio Cianci
- Department of General Surgery and Medical-Surgical Specialties, Institute of Obstetrics and Ginecology, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Giovanni Carlo Ettorre
- Department of Medical Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies, Radiology I Unit, University Hospital "Policlinico-Vittorio Emanuele", Via Santa Sofia 78, 95123, Catania, Italy
| | - Antonio Basile
- Department of Medical Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies, Radiology I Unit, University Hospital "Policlinico-Vittorio Emanuele", Via Santa Sofia 78, 95123, Catania, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Ibrahim RSM, Maher MAELO, Abdalaziz S, Amer S, Shafie D, Hamed ST. Functional MRI in the pre-operative assessment of GI-RADS 3, 4, and 5 ovarian masses. THE EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE 2019. [DOI: 10.1186/s43055-019-0075-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Characterization of an ovarian lesion is a diagnostic challenge. A correct preoperative assessment is of great importance so as to arrange adequate therapeutic procedures. The aim of the current study is to evaluate the diagnostic performance of functional MRI in differentiation between malignant, borderline, and benign ovarian masses.
Results
This study included 56 adnexal lesions. Bilateral synchronous ovarian lesions are detected in 16 cases. Postoperative histologically proved to be benign in 17 (30%), borderline (low potential malignancy) in 12 (22%), and malignant in 27 (48%). The overall diagnostic performance of conventional MRI in the diagnosis of adenexal lesion was a sensitivity of 74%, specificity of 47%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 76%, negative predictive value (NPV) of 44%, and an accuracy of 66%. Functional pelvic MRI examination showed an increase in overall diagnostic performance compared to conventional values with the highest sensitivity of 90% and NPV of 67% using DWI, and the highest specificity of 88%, PPV of 94%, and an accuracy of 82% using DCE MRI.
Conclusion
Functional MRI in conjugation with conventional MRI plays a key role in the ovarian lesion detection, characterization, and staging. Functional MRI is currently being evaluated as possible predictive and prognostic biomarkers in ovarian lesions.
Collapse
|
31
|
Ibrahim RSM, El Fattah MSA, Metwally ZM, Eldin LAS. Value of magnetic resonance spectroscopy in assessment of adnexal lesions. THE EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE 2019. [DOI: 10.1186/s43055-019-0094-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The purpose of this study is to investigate the role of proton MR spectroscopy (1H-MRS) in the characterization and diagnosis of ovarian lesions.
Results
From October 2015 to October 2017, a total of 57 female patients (65 adnexal lesions; 8 cases were bilateral) were included. The examined lesions were classified according to their histopathological findings, (37 (57%) benign lesions, 4 (6%) borderline lesions, and 24 (37%) malignant lesions). The mean choline/creatinine (CHO/Cr) ratio was 1.29 ± 0.98 SD for malignant lesions, while the mean value in borderline lesions was 0.63 ± 0.15 SD, and the mean value for the benign lesions was 0.65 ± 0.34. Therefore, the mean CHO/Cr ratio was much higher in malignant than in benign lesions, which was statistically significant (P ≤ 0.001) as well as between the borderline and invasive lesions (P = 0.05), but not between the benign and borderline lesions. The diagnostic performance of conventional MRI in diagnosing adnexal lesions was 100%, specificity was 76%, and accuracy was 86%. However, MRS individual diagnostic performances are the following: sensitivity 89%, specificity, and 100% with an accuracy of 95%.
Conclusion
MRS proved to be an accurate and efficient method for the analysis of adnexal lesions and in differentiation between benign and malignant tumors.
Collapse
|
32
|
van Nimwegen LWE, Mavinkurve-Groothuis AMC, de Krijger RR, Hulsker CCC, Goverde AJ, Zsiros J, Littooij AS. MR imaging in discriminating between benign and malignant paediatric ovarian masses: a systematic review. Eur Radiol 2019; 30:1166-1181. [PMID: 31529256 PMCID: PMC6957553 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-019-06420-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2019] [Revised: 08/03/2019] [Accepted: 08/08/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The use of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in differentiation between benign and malignant adnexal masses in children and adolescents might be of great value in the diagnostic workup of sonographically indeterminate masses, since preserving fertility is of particular importance in this population. This systematic review evaluates the diagnostic value of MR imaging in children with an ovarian mass. METHODS The review was made according to the PRISMA Statement. PubMed and EMBASE were systematically searched for studies on the use of MR imaging in differential diagnosis of ovarian masses in both adult women and children from 2008 to 2018. RESULTS Sixteen paediatric and 18 adult studies were included. In the included studies, MR imaging has shown good diagnostic performance in differentiating between benign and malignant ovarian masses. MR imaging techniques including diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) imaging seem to further improve the diagnostic performance. CONCLUSION The addition of DWI with apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values measured in enhancing components of solid lesions and DCE imaging may further increase the good diagnostic performance of MR imaging in the pre-operative differentiation between benign and malignant ovarian masses by increasing specificity. Prospective age-specific studies are needed to confirm the high diagnostic performance of MR imaging in children and adolescents with a sonographically indeterminate ovarian mass. KEY POINTS • MR imaging, based on several morphological features, is of good diagnostic performance in differentiating between benign and malignant ovarian masses. Sensitivity and specificity varied between 84.8 to 100% and 20.0 to 98.4%, respectively. • MR imaging techniques like diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) imaging seem to improve the diagnostic performance. • Specific studies in children and adolescents with ovarian masses are required to confirm the suggested increased diagnostic performance of DWI and DCE in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lotte W E van Nimwegen
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Heidelberglaan 25, 3584, CS, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Ronald R de Krijger
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Heidelberglaan 25, 3584, CS, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Caroline C C Hulsker
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Heidelberglaan 25, 3584, CS, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Angelique J Goverde
- Department of Reproductive Medicine and Gynaecology, University Medical Center of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - József Zsiros
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Heidelberglaan 25, 3584, CS, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Annemieke S Littooij
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Heidelberglaan 25, 3584, CS, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Do DWI and quantitative DCE perfusion MR have a prognostic value in high-grade serous ovarian cancer? Radiol Med 2019; 124:1315-1323. [PMID: 31473928 DOI: 10.1007/s11547-019-01075-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2019] [Accepted: 08/13/2019] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate whether perfusion and diffusion parameters from staging MR in ovarian cancer (OC) patients may predict the presence of residual tumor at surgery and the progression-free survival (PFS) in 12 months. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients who are from a single institution, candidate for OC to cytoreductive surgery and undergoing MR for staging purposes were included in this study. Inclusion criteria were: preoperative MR including diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and perfusion dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) sequence; cytoreductive surgery performed within a month from MR; and minimum follow-up of 12 months. Patients' characteristics including the presence of residual tumor at surgery (R0 or R1) and relapse within 12 months from surgery were recorded. DWI parameters included apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of the largest ovarian mass (O-ADC) and normalized ovarian ADC as a ratio between ovarian ADC and muscle ADC (M-ADC). DCE quantitative parameters included were descriptors of tumor vascular properties such as forward and backward transfer constants, plasma volume and volume of extracellular space. Statistical analysis was performed, and p values < 0.05 were considered significant. RESULTS Forty-nine patients were included. M-ADC showed a slightly significant association with the presence of residual tumor at surgery. None of the other functional parameters showed either difference between R0 and R1 patients or association with PFS in the first 12 months. CONCLUSIONS This preliminary study demonstrated a slightly significant association between normalized ovarian ADC and the presence of residual tumor at surgery. The other perfusion and diffusion parameters were not significant for the endpoints of this study.
Collapse
|
34
|
Franier BDL, Thompson M. Early stage detection and screening of ovarian cancer: A research opportunity and significant challenge for biosensor technology. Biosens Bioelectron 2019; 135:71-81. [DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2019.03.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2018] [Revised: 03/04/2019] [Accepted: 03/19/2019] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
|
35
|
Gity M, Parviz S, Saligheh Rad H, Fathi Kazerooni A, Shirali E, Shakiba M, Baikpour M. Differentiation of Benign from Malignant Adnexal Masses by
Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI): Quantitative
and Semi-quantitative analysis at 3-Tesla MRI. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2019; 20:1073-1079. [PMID: 31030476 PMCID: PMC6948906 DOI: 10.31557/apjcp.2019.20.4.1073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: To evaluate the utility of the pharmacokinetic modeling derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) in differentiating benign from malignant adnexal masses. Methods: A total of 43 patients with 49 complex adnexal masses (27 benign, 3 borderline, and 19 malignant lesions) underwent preoperative DCE-MRI examinations on a 3 Tesla MRI. Using extended Tofts’ model, quantitative analysis was performed in the solid components of all tumors. Three pharmacokinetic parameters were defined as volume transfer coefficient (Ktrans), the rate constant (Kep), and the plasma volume (Vp). Semi-quantitative analysis was also performed and the values of relative signal intensity (SI rel) wash-in-rate (WIR), the initial area under the curve (iAUC60), time-to-peak (TTP) and wash-out-rate (WOR) were calculated. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to evaluate diagnostic characteristics of each DCE-MRI parameter in differentiating borderline/malignant tumors from benign lesions and to provide the optimal cutoff values for these variables. Results: SI rel had the highest diagnostic value (AUC=0.872; p<0.001; cut-off=121.4 associated with an overall accuracy=79.6%, sensitivity=95.5%, specificity=66.7%, NPV=94.8% and PPV=70.0%). Ktrans had the second highest AUC=0.836 (p<0.001; cut-off=0.034 associated with an overall accuracy=79.6%, sensitivity=86.4%, specificity=74.1%, NPV=87.0% and PPV=73.1%). The other factors found to be acceptable diagnostic parameters for borderline/malignant lesions included WIR (AUC=0.816; p<0.001), iAUC60 (AUC=0.808; p<0.001), Vp (AUC=0.795; p<0.001), SI max (AUC=0.737, p=0.005), SI peak (AUC=0.737; p=0.005) and Kep (AUC=0.681; p=0.031). Conclusion: Quantitative DCE-MRI is a relevant tool for differentiating benign from malignant adnexal masses. Among all the DCE parameters, SI rel and Ktrans are the most accurate discriminators.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masoumeh Gity
- Advanced Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Research Center (ADIR), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. ,Department of Radiology, Medical Imaging Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Sara Parviz
- Advanced Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Research Center (ADIR), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
| | - Hamidreza Saligheh Rad
- Quantitative MR Imaging and Spectroscopy Group, Research Center for Molecular and Cellular Imaging, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.,Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Anahita Fathi Kazerooni
- Quantitative MR Imaging and Spectroscopy Group, Research Center for Molecular and Cellular Imaging, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Elham Shirali
- Department of Gynecology Oncology, Yas Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Madjid Shakiba
- Advanced Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Research Center (ADIR), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
| | - Masoud Baikpour
- School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Ma FH, Li YA, Liu J, Li HM, Zhang GF, Qiang JW. Role of proton MR spectroscopy in the differentiation of borderline from malignant epithelial ovarian tumors: A preliminary study. J Magn Reson Imaging 2018; 49:1684-1693. [PMID: 30353967 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.26541] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2018] [Accepted: 09/27/2018] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Feng Hua Ma
- Department of Radiology, Jinshan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College Fudan University Shanghai P.R. China
- Department of Radiology, Obstetrics & Gynecology Hospital, Shanghai Medical College Fudan University Shanghai P.R. China
| | - Yong Ai Li
- Department of Radiology, Jinshan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College Fudan University Shanghai P.R. China
| | - Jia Liu
- Department of Radiology, Obstetrics & Gynecology Hospital, Shanghai Medical College Fudan University Shanghai P.R. China
| | - Hai Ming Li
- Department of Radiology, Jinshan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College Fudan University Shanghai P.R. China
| | - Guo Fu Zhang
- Department of Radiology, Obstetrics & Gynecology Hospital, Shanghai Medical College Fudan University Shanghai P.R. China
| | - Jin Wei Qiang
- Department of Radiology, Jinshan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College Fudan University Shanghai P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Adnexal lesions: Imaging strategies for ultrasound and MR imaging. Diagn Interv Imaging 2018; 100:635-646. [PMID: 30177450 DOI: 10.1016/j.diii.2018.06.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2018] [Accepted: 06/12/2018] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Adnexal lesions are routinely encountered in general practice. Ultrasound is the first line of investigation in determining the benign or malignant potential of an adnexal lesion. In the cases of classic simple cysts, hemorrhagic cysts, endometriomas, dermoids and obviously malignant lesions, ultrasound may be sufficient for management recommendations. In cases where there is an isolated adnexal lesion, without peritoneal disease or serum CA-125 elevation, and in lesions considered indeterminate on ultrasound, MR imaging with incorporation of the ADNEx MR score can increase the specificity for the diagnosis of benignity or malignancy. This article will review the imaging evaluation of adnexal lesions and how to incorporate the ADNEx MR score to help guide clinical management.
Collapse
|
38
|
The diagnostic potential of diffusion weighted and dynamic contrast enhanced MR imaging in the characterization of complex ovarian lesions. THE EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrnm.2018.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
|
39
|
Lam CZ, Chavhan GB. Magnetic resonance imaging of pediatric adnexal masses and mimics. Pediatr Radiol 2018; 48:1291-1306. [PMID: 30078037 DOI: 10.1007/s00247-018-4073-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2017] [Revised: 11/07/2017] [Accepted: 01/03/2018] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
Evaluation of adnexal masses in children and adolescents relies on imaging for appropriate diagnosis and management. Pelvic MRI is indicated and adds value for all adnexal masses when surgery is considered or when ultrasound findings are indeterminate. Specifically, features on MR imaging can help distinguish between benign and malignant lesions, which not only influences the decision between surgery and conservative treatment, but also the type of surgery to be performed, including potential use of fertility-sparing approaches with minimally invasive techniques. Larger size, younger age, presentation with precocious puberty or virilization, restricted diffusion in a solid mass, and rapid and strong enhancement of solid components are all features concerning for malignancy. In addition, distinctive MR imaging features of adnexal masses, combined with clinical and laboratory biomarkers, might suggest a specific histological diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher Z Lam
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, The Hospital for Sick Children, Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, 555 University Ave., Toronto, ON, M5G 1X8, Canada.
| | - Govind B Chavhan
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, The Hospital for Sick Children, Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, 555 University Ave., Toronto, ON, M5G 1X8, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
A systematic approach to adnexal masses discovered on ultrasound: the ADNEx MR scoring system. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2018; 43:679-695. [PMID: 28900696 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-017-1272-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
Adnexal lesions are a common occurrence in radiology practice and imaging plays a crucial role in triaging women appropriately. Current trends toward early detection and characterization have increased the need for accurate imaging assessment of adnexal lesions prior to treatment. Ultrasound is the first-line imaging modality for assessing adnexal lesions; however, approximately 20% of lesions are incompletely characterized after ultrasound evaluation. Secondary assessment with MR imaging using the ADNEx MR Scoring System has been demonstrated as highly accurate in the characterization of adnexal lesions and in excluding ovarian cancer. This review will address the role of MR imaging in further assessment of adnexal lesions discovered on US, and the utility of the ADNEx MR Scoring System.
Collapse
|
41
|
Sadowski EA, Paroder V, Patel-Lippmann K, Robbins JB, Barroilhet L, Maddox E, McMahon T, Sampene E, Wasnik AP, Blaty AD, Maturen KE. Indeterminate Adnexal Cysts at US: Prevalence and Characteristics of Ovarian Cancer. Radiology 2018; 287:1041-1049. [PMID: 29480762 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2018172271] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Purpose To assess the prevalence of indeterminate adnexal cysts in women presenting to academic medical centers for pelvic ultrasonography (US), determine the incidence of malignancy, and identify cyst and patient characteristics that are predictive of malignancy. Materials and Methods A multicenter study of US-detected adnexal cysts with appropriate follow-up (surgical pathologic examination, imaging and/or clinical examination) was conducted from January 2008 to June 2012. Indeterminate cysts were classified as category 1 (typical benign appearing cysts >5 cm) or category 2 (cysts with avascular solid components) on the basis of a combination of definitions in the existing literature. The incidence of neoplasms and malignant tumors was calculated. Patient and cyst characteristics associated with neoplasm and malignant tumors were evaluated with the χ2 test or Fisher exact test for categorical variables and the t test for continuous variables. A backward stepwise logistic regression model was performed for two outcomes: (a) the presence of any neoplasm (benign or malignant) and (b) the presence of a malignant tumor. Results There were 1637 women with an adnexal cyst at US; 391 (mean age = 41.8 years ± 13.5.1; range = 17-91 years) had an indeterminate adnexal cyst at US. The prevalence of indeterminate adnexal cysts was 23.9% (391 of 1637; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.22, 0.26). Three hundred three indeterminate cysts in 280 women (mean age = 42.9 years ± 14.1; range = 17-88 years) had adequate follow-up. The incidence of ovarian neoplasms (benign and malignant) was 24.8% (75 of 303 cysts; 95% CI: 0.20, 0.30), and the incidence of malignant tumors was 3.6% (11 of 303 cysts; 95% CI: 0.02, 0.06). The proportion of ovarian neoplasms differed between category 1 and category 2 cysts (17.5% [25 of 143 cysts; 95% CI: 0.12, 0.25] vs 31.3% [50 of 160 cysts; 95% CI: 0.24, 0.39], respectively; P = .001). The proportion of malignant tumors differed between categories 1 and 2 cysts (0% [0 of 143 cysts] vs 6.9% [11 of 160 cysts; 95% CI: 0.03, 0.12]; P < .001). The presence of an avascular nodular component was a significant predictor of malignancy at stepwise logistic regression analysis (odds ratio = 2.83; P ≤ .0001; 95% CI: 1.69, 4.70). Conclusion The presence of an avascular nodular component was the most significant predictor of the presence of malignancy in indeterminate adnexal cysts. The risk of malignancy is higher with category 2 cysts than with category 1 cysts. © RSNA, 2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth A Sadowski
- From the Departments of Radiology (E.A.S., J.B.R., E.M.), Obstetrics and Gynecology (E.A.S., L.B.), and Biostatistics and Medical Informatics (E.S.), University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Clinical Science Center, E3/372, 600 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53792-3252; Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY (V.P., T.M.); Department of Radiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn (K.P.L.); Department of Radiology (A.P.W., A.D.B., K.E.M.) and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (K.E.M.), University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Mich
| | - Viktoriya Paroder
- From the Departments of Radiology (E.A.S., J.B.R., E.M.), Obstetrics and Gynecology (E.A.S., L.B.), and Biostatistics and Medical Informatics (E.S.), University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Clinical Science Center, E3/372, 600 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53792-3252; Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY (V.P., T.M.); Department of Radiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn (K.P.L.); Department of Radiology (A.P.W., A.D.B., K.E.M.) and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (K.E.M.), University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Mich
| | - Krupa Patel-Lippmann
- From the Departments of Radiology (E.A.S., J.B.R., E.M.), Obstetrics and Gynecology (E.A.S., L.B.), and Biostatistics and Medical Informatics (E.S.), University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Clinical Science Center, E3/372, 600 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53792-3252; Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY (V.P., T.M.); Department of Radiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn (K.P.L.); Department of Radiology (A.P.W., A.D.B., K.E.M.) and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (K.E.M.), University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Mich
| | - Jessica B Robbins
- From the Departments of Radiology (E.A.S., J.B.R., E.M.), Obstetrics and Gynecology (E.A.S., L.B.), and Biostatistics and Medical Informatics (E.S.), University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Clinical Science Center, E3/372, 600 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53792-3252; Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY (V.P., T.M.); Department of Radiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn (K.P.L.); Department of Radiology (A.P.W., A.D.B., K.E.M.) and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (K.E.M.), University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Mich
| | - Lisa Barroilhet
- From the Departments of Radiology (E.A.S., J.B.R., E.M.), Obstetrics and Gynecology (E.A.S., L.B.), and Biostatistics and Medical Informatics (E.S.), University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Clinical Science Center, E3/372, 600 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53792-3252; Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY (V.P., T.M.); Department of Radiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn (K.P.L.); Department of Radiology (A.P.W., A.D.B., K.E.M.) and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (K.E.M.), University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Mich
| | - Elizabeth Maddox
- From the Departments of Radiology (E.A.S., J.B.R., E.M.), Obstetrics and Gynecology (E.A.S., L.B.), and Biostatistics and Medical Informatics (E.S.), University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Clinical Science Center, E3/372, 600 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53792-3252; Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY (V.P., T.M.); Department of Radiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn (K.P.L.); Department of Radiology (A.P.W., A.D.B., K.E.M.) and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (K.E.M.), University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Mich
| | - Timothy McMahon
- From the Departments of Radiology (E.A.S., J.B.R., E.M.), Obstetrics and Gynecology (E.A.S., L.B.), and Biostatistics and Medical Informatics (E.S.), University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Clinical Science Center, E3/372, 600 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53792-3252; Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY (V.P., T.M.); Department of Radiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn (K.P.L.); Department of Radiology (A.P.W., A.D.B., K.E.M.) and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (K.E.M.), University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Mich
| | - Emmanuel Sampene
- From the Departments of Radiology (E.A.S., J.B.R., E.M.), Obstetrics and Gynecology (E.A.S., L.B.), and Biostatistics and Medical Informatics (E.S.), University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Clinical Science Center, E3/372, 600 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53792-3252; Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY (V.P., T.M.); Department of Radiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn (K.P.L.); Department of Radiology (A.P.W., A.D.B., K.E.M.) and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (K.E.M.), University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Mich
| | - Ashish P Wasnik
- From the Departments of Radiology (E.A.S., J.B.R., E.M.), Obstetrics and Gynecology (E.A.S., L.B.), and Biostatistics and Medical Informatics (E.S.), University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Clinical Science Center, E3/372, 600 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53792-3252; Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY (V.P., T.M.); Department of Radiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn (K.P.L.); Department of Radiology (A.P.W., A.D.B., K.E.M.) and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (K.E.M.), University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Mich
| | - Alexander D Blaty
- From the Departments of Radiology (E.A.S., J.B.R., E.M.), Obstetrics and Gynecology (E.A.S., L.B.), and Biostatistics and Medical Informatics (E.S.), University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Clinical Science Center, E3/372, 600 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53792-3252; Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY (V.P., T.M.); Department of Radiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn (K.P.L.); Department of Radiology (A.P.W., A.D.B., K.E.M.) and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (K.E.M.), University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Mich
| | - Katherine E Maturen
- From the Departments of Radiology (E.A.S., J.B.R., E.M.), Obstetrics and Gynecology (E.A.S., L.B.), and Biostatistics and Medical Informatics (E.S.), University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Clinical Science Center, E3/372, 600 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53792-3252; Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY (V.P., T.M.); Department of Radiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn (K.P.L.); Department of Radiology (A.P.W., A.D.B., K.E.M.) and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (K.E.M.), University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Mich
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
The role of dynamic contrast enhanced MR imaging in the assessment of inconclusive ovarian masses. THE EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrnm.2017.05.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
|
43
|
Khan SR, Arshad M, Wallitt K, Stewart V, Bharwani N, Barwick TD. What’s New in Imaging for Gynecologic Cancer? Curr Oncol Rep 2017; 19:85. [DOI: 10.1007/s11912-017-0640-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
|
44
|
Yuan SJ, Qiao TK, Qiang JW, Cai SQ, Li RK. The value of DCE-MRI in assessing histopathological and molecular biological features in induced rat epithelial ovarian carcinomas. J Ovarian Res 2017; 10:65. [PMID: 28950890 PMCID: PMC5615469 DOI: 10.1186/s13048-017-0362-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2017] [Accepted: 09/19/2017] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background To investigate dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) for assessing histopathological and molecular biological features in induced rat epithelial ovarian carcinomas (EOCs). Methods 7,12-dimethylbenz[A]anthracene (DMBA) was applied to induce EOCs in situ in 46 SD rats. Conventional MRI and DCE-MRI were performed to evaluate the morphology and perfusion features of the tumors, including the time-signal intensity curve (TIC), volume transfer constant (Ktrans), rate constant (Kep), extravascular extracellular space volume ratio (Ve) and initial area under the curve (IAUC). DCE-MRI parameters were correlated with histological grade, microvascular density (MVD), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and fraction of Ki67-positive cells and the serum level of cancer antigen 125 (CA125). Results Thirty-five of the 46 rats developed EOCs. DCE-MRI showed type III TIC more frequently than type II (29/35 vs. 6/35, p < 0.001) in EOCs. The two types of TIC of tumors had significant differences in the histological grade, MVD, expression of VEGF and Ki67, and the serum level of CA125 (all p < 0.01). Ktrans, Kep and IAUC values showed significant differences in different histological grades in overall and pairwise comparisons except for IAUC in grade 2 vs. grade 3 (all p < 0.01). There was no significant difference in Ve values among the three grade groups (p > 0.05). Ktrans, Kep and IAUC values were positively correlated with MVD, VEGF and Ki67 expression (all p < 0.01). Ve was not significantly correlated with MVD, VEGF expression, Ki67 expression and the CA125 level (all p > 0.05). Conclusions TIC types and perfusion parameters of DCE-MRI can reflect tumor grade, angiogenesis and cell proliferation to some extent, thereby helping treatment planning and predicting prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Su Juan Yuan
- Department of Oncology, Jinshan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, 1508 Longhang Road, Shanghai, 201508, People's Republic of China
| | - Tian Kui Qiao
- Department of Oncology, Jinshan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, 1508 Longhang Road, Shanghai, 201508, People's Republic of China
| | - Jin Wei Qiang
- Department of Radiology, Jinshan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, 1508 Longhang Road, Shanghai, 201508, People's Republic of China.
| | - Song Qi Cai
- Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, 180 Fenglin Road, Shanghai, 200032, People's Republic of China
| | - Ruo Kun Li
- Department of Radiology, Jinshan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, 1508 Longhang Road, Shanghai, 201508, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Diagnostic value of whole body diffusion-weighted MRI compared to computed tomography for pre-operative assessment of patients suspected for ovarian cancer. Eur J Cancer 2017; 83:88-98. [PMID: 28734146 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.06.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 92] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2017] [Revised: 05/29/2017] [Accepted: 06/11/2017] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite excellent per-lesion performance for peritoneal staging, the additional clinical value of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI/MRI) compared to computed tomography (CT) remains to be established in ovarian cancer. Our purpose was to evaluate whole body (WB)-DWI/MRI for diagnosis, staging and operability assessment of patients suspected for ovarian cancer compared to CT. METHODS One hundred and sixty-one patients suspected for ovarian carcinoma underwent 3 T WB-DWI/MRI and contrast-enhanced CT. WB-DWI/MRI and CT were compared for confirmation of the malignant nature and primary origin of the ovarian mass, Fédération Internationale de Gynécologie et d'Obstétrique (FIGO) staging and prediction of incomplete resection using institutional operability criteria. Interobserver agreement between two readers was determined for WB-DWI/MRI and CT. RESULTS WB-DWI/MRI showed a significantly higher accuracy than CT (93 versus 82%, p = 0.001) to confirm the malignant nature of the ovarian mass and correctly identified 26 of 32 (81%) cancers of non-ovarian origin compared to 10/32 (31%) for CT (p < 0.001). WB-DWI/MRI assigned more ovarian carcinoma patients to the correct FIGO stage (82/94, 87%) compared with CT (33/94, 35%). For prediction of incomplete resection, WB-DWI/MRI showed significantly higher sensitivity (94 versus 66%), specificity (97.7 versus 77.3%) and accuracy (95.7 versus 71.3%) compared to CT (p < 0.001). Interobserver agreement was almost perfect (κ = 0.90) for WB-DWI/MRI and moderate (κ = 0.52) for CT for prediction of incomplete resection. CONCLUSIONS WB-DWI/MRI was superior to CT for primary tumour characterisation, staging and prediction of incomplete resection in patients suspected for ovarian cancer.
Collapse
|
46
|
Mahajan A, Sable NP, Popat PB, Bhargava P, Gangadhar K, Thakur MH, Arya S. Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Gynecological Malignancies: Role in Personalized Management. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2017; 38:231-268. [PMID: 28705370 DOI: 10.1053/j.sult.2016.11.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Gynecological malignancies are a leading cause of mortality and morbidity in women and pose a significant health problem around the world. Currently used staging systems for management of gynecological malignancies have unresolved issues, the most important being recommendations on the use of imaging. Although not mandatory as per the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics recommendations, preoperative cross-sectional imaging is strongly recommended for adequate and optimal management of patients with gynecological malignancies. Standardized disease-specific magnetic resonance imaging protocols help assess disease spread accurately and avoid pitfalls. Multiparametric imaging holds promise as a roadmap to personalized management in gynecological malignancies. In this review, we will highlight the role of magnetic resonance imaging in cervical, endometrial, and ovarian carcinomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abhishek Mahajan
- Department of Radiodiagnosis, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - Nilesh P Sable
- Department of Radiodiagnosis, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - Palak B Popat
- Department of Radiodiagnosis, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - Puneet Bhargava
- Department of Radiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA
| | - Kiran Gangadhar
- Department of Radiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA
| | | | - Supreeta Arya
- Department of Radiodiagnosis, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Masch WR, Daye D, Lee SI. MR Imaging for Incidental Adnexal Mass Characterization. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2017; 25:521-543. [PMID: 28668158 DOI: 10.1016/j.mric.2017.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Incidentally detected adnexal masses are common, and the overwhelming majority of them are benign. As many of these adnexal masses are considered indeterminate at CT or US, a large number of benign oophorectomies occur. Of the malignant adnexal masses, high-grade primary ovarian neoplasms with fast doubling times and early dissemination are the most common. Due to their aggressive behavior, diagnosis of malignancy by interval growth on surveillance imaging represents an undesirable option. Immediate MR characterization allows for a decreased rate of benign oophorectomies and expedited triage of patients to definitive treatment when malignancy is suspected.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William R Masch
- Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Health System, UH B2A205G, 1500 East Medical Center Drive, SPC 5030, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
| | - Dania Daye
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Susanna I Lee
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Rivera Domínguez A, Mora Jurado A, García de la Oliva A, de Araujo Martins-Romeo D, Cueto Álvarez L. Gynecological pelvic pain as emergency pathology. RADIOLOGIA 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/j.rxeng.2016.09.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
49
|
Khiewvan B, Torigian DA, Emamzadehfard S, Paydary K, Salavati A, Houshmand S, Werner TJ, Alavi A. An update on the role of PET/CT and PET/MRI in ovarian cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2017; 44:1079-1091. [PMID: 28180966 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-017-3638-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2016] [Accepted: 01/24/2017] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
This review article summarizes the role of PET/CT and PET/MRI in ovarian cancer. With regard to the diagnosis of ovarian cancer, the presence of FDG uptake within the ovary of a postmenopausal woman raises the concern for ovarian cancer. Multiple studies show that FDG PET/CT can detect lymph node and distant metastasis in ovarian cancer with high accuracy and may, therefore, alter the management to obtain better clinical outcomes. Although PET/CT staging is superior for N and M staging of ovarian cancer, its role is limited for T staging. Additionally, FDG PET/CT is of great benefit in evaluating treatment response and has prognostic value in patients with ovarian cancer. FDG PET/CT also has value to detect recurrent disease, particularly in patients with elevated serum CA-125 levels and negative or inconclusive conventional imaging test results. PET/MRI may beneficial for tumor staging because MRI has higher soft tissue contrast and no ionizing radiation exposure compared to CT. Some non-FDG PET radiotracers such as 18F-fluorothymidine (FLT) or 11C-methionine (MET) have been studied in preclinical and clinical studies as well and may play a role in the evaluation of patients with ovarian cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjapa Khiewvan
- Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand, 10700
| | - Drew A Torigian
- Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Sahra Emamzadehfard
- Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Koosha Paydary
- Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Ali Salavati
- Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Sina Houshmand
- Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Thomas J Werner
- Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Abass Alavi
- Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Li HM, Qiang JW, Ma FH, Zhao SH. The value of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in characterizing complex ovarian tumors. J Ovarian Res 2017; 10:4. [PMID: 28088245 PMCID: PMC5237560 DOI: 10.1186/s13048-017-0302-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2016] [Accepted: 01/06/2017] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The study aimed to investigate the utility of dynamic contrast enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) in the differentiation of malignant, borderline, and benign complex ovarian tumors. METHODS DCE-MRI data of 102 consecutive complex ovarian tumors (benign 15, borderline 16, and malignant 71), confirmed by surgery and histopathology, were analyzed retrospectively. The patterns (I, II, and III) of time-signal intensity curve (TIC) and three semi-quantitative parameters, including enhancement amplitude (EA), maximal slope (MS), and time of half rising (THR), were evaluated and compared among benign, borderline, and malignant ovarian tumors. The types of TIC were compared by Pearson Chi-square χ 2 between malignant and benign, borderline tumors. The mean values of EA, MS, and THR were compared using one-way ANOVA or nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test. RESULTS Fifty-nine of 71 (83%) malignant tumors showed a type-III TIC; 9 of 16 (56%) borderline tumors showed a type-II TIC, and 10 of 15 (67%) benign tumors showed a type-II TIC, with a statistically significant difference between malignant and benign tumors (P < 0.001) and between malignant and borderline tumors (P < 0.001). MS was significantly higher in malignant tumors than in benign tumors and in borderline than in benign tumors (P < 0.001, P = 0.013, respectively). THR was significantly lower in malignant tumors than in benign tumors and in borderline than in benign tumors (P < 0.001, P = 0.007, respectively). There was no statistically significant difference between malignant and borderline tumors in MS and THR (P = 0.19, 0.153) or among malignant, borderline, and benign tumors in EA (all P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS DCE-MRI is helpful for characterizing complex ovarian tumors; however, semi-quantitative parameters perform poorly when distinguishing malignant from borderline tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hai-Ming Li
- Department of Radiology, Jinshan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, 1508 Longhang Road, Shanghai, 201508, China.,Department of Radiology, Nantong Cancer Hospital, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, 226361, China
| | - Jin-Wei Qiang
- Department of Radiology, Jinshan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, 1508 Longhang Road, Shanghai, 201508, China.
| | - Feng-Hua Ma
- Department of Radiology, Obstetrics & Gynecology Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200011, China
| | - Shu-Hui Zhao
- Department of Radiology, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, 1665 Kongjiang Road, Shanghai, 2000092, China
| |
Collapse
|