Exercise effect on insulin-dependent and insulin-independent glucose utilization in healthy individuals and individuals with type 1 diabetes: a modeling study

Effect of exercise on plasma insulin levels in individuals with type 1 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis

AIMS

Current evidence of the impact of acute exercise on insulin levels in individuals with type 1 diabetes remains controversial. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore exercise-induced changes in insulin levels.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a systematic review (until 05 November 2023) and meta-analysis exploring the effect of exercise on insulin concentration in individuals with type 1 diabetes. We included randomised cross-over studies for rapid-acting insulin and pre- and post-studies for long-acting insulin in individuals with type 1 diabetes performing any type of acute exercise and had a control condition. The exercise-induced change in insulin levels was the outcome of interest. When possible, the mean differences (MDs) in insulin levels were pooled using the DerSimonian and Laird random effect method. Risk of bias was assessed for each included study.

RESULTS

Seventeen trials, encompassing 186 participants with type 1 diabetes, were included in the systematic review. Twelve out of 17 studies included participants on rapid-acting insulin regimens and used a cross-over design, whereas five out of 17 single-arm studies included participants on (ultra)long-acting insulin. Seven out of 12 studies on rapid-acting insulins and all the single-arm studies were at high risk of bias. Results suggest a statistically significant, small-to-moderate increase of rapid-acting insulin after 30 min of exercise (MD of 18.44 [95% CI 0.02; 36.86; I2 0%] pmol/L); meanwhile, findings on (ultra)long-acting insulin were inconclusive.

CONCLUSIONS

A small-to-moderate increase of insulin levels in studies including rapid-acting insulin was found after a bout of physical exercise in individuals with type 1 diabetes. However, current gaps in high-quality evidence challenge our understanding of insulin kinetics around exercise.

Hyperglycemia Suppresses Lactate Clearance During Exercise in Type 1 Diabetes

CONTEXT

Circulating lactate concentration is an important determinant of exercise tolerance.

OBJECTIVE

This work aimed to determine the role of hyperglycemia on lactate metabolism during exercise in individuals with type 1 diabetes (T1D).

METHODS

The protocol at the University of Virginia compared 7 T1D participants and 7 participants without diabetes (ND) at euglycemia (5.5 mM) or hyperglycemia (9.2 mM) in random order in T1D and at euglycemia in ND. Intervention included [1-13C] lactate infusion, exercise at 65% maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max), euglycemia, and hyperglycemia visits. The main outcome measure was lactate turnover before, during, and after 60 minutes of exercise at 65% VO2max.

RESULTS

A 2-compartment model with loss only from the peripheral compartment described lactate kinetics. Volume of distribution of the accessible compartment was similar between T1D and ND individuals (P = .76) and concordant with plasma volume (∼40 mL/kg). Circulating lactate concentrations were higher (P < .001) in T1D participants during exercise at hyperglycemia than euglycemia. Exercise-induced lactate appearance did not differ (P = .13) between hyperglycemia and euglycemia. However, lactate clearance (CL) was lower (P = .03) during hyperglycemia than euglycemia in T1D participants. There were no differences in any of the aforementioned parameters between T1D and ND participants during euglycemia.

CONCLUSION

Hyperglycemia modulates lactate metabolism during exercise by lowering CL, leading to higher circulating lactate concentrations in T1D individuals. This novel observation implies that exercise during hyperglycemia can lead to higher circulating lactate concentrations thus increasing the likelihood of reaching the lactate threshold sooner in T1D, and has high translational relevance both for providers and recreationally active people with T1D.

Current and future therapies to treat impaired awareness of hypoglycemia

In order to achieve optimal glycemic control, intensive insulin regimes are needed for individuals with Type 1 Diabetes (T1D) and insulin-dependent Type 2 Diabetes (T2D). Unfortunately, intensive glycemic control often results in insulin-induced hypoglycemia. Moreover, recurrent episodes of hypoglycemia result in both the loss of the characteristic warning symptoms associated with hypoglycemia and an attenuated counterregulatory hormone responses. The blunting of warning symptoms is known as impaired awareness of hypoglycemia (IAH). Together, IAH and the loss of the hormonal response is termed hypoglycemia associated autonomic failure (HAAF). IAH is prevalent in up to 25% in people with T1D and up to 10% in people with T2D. IAH and HAAF increase the risk of severe hypoglycemia 6-fold and 25-fold, respectively. To reduce this risk for severe hypoglycemia, multiple different therapeutic approaches are being explored that could improve awareness of hypoglycemia. Current therapies to improve awareness of hypoglycemia include patient education and psychoeducation, the use of novel glycemic control technology, pancreas/islet transplantation, and drug therapy. This review examines both existing therapies and potential therapies that are in pre-clinical testing. Novel treatments that improve awareness of hypoglycemia, via improving the counterregulatory hormone responses or improving hypoglycemic symptom recognition, would also shed light on the possible neurological mechanisms that lead to the development of IAH. To reduce the risk of severe hypoglycemia in people with diabetes, elucidating the mechanism behind IAH, as well as developing targeted therapies is currently an unmet need for those that suffer from IAH.

Quantifying insulin-mediated and noninsulin-mediated changes in glucose dynamics during resistance exercise in type 1 diabetes

Exercise can cause dangerous fluctuations in blood glucose in people living with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Aerobic exercise, for example, can cause acute hypoglycemia secondary to increased insulin-mediated and noninsulin-mediated glucose utilization. Less is known about how resistance exercise (RE) impacts glucose dynamics. Twenty-five people with T1D underwent three sessions of either moderate or high-intensity RE at three insulin infusion rates during a glucose tracer clamp. We calculated time-varying rates of endogenous glucose production (EGP) and glucose disposal (Rd) across all sessions and used linear regression and extrapolation to estimate insulin- and noninsulin-mediated components of glucose utilization. Blood glucose did not change on average during exercise. The area under the curve (AUC) for EGP increased by 1.04 mM during RE (95% CI: 0.65-1.43, P < 0.001) and decreased proportionally to insulin infusion rate (0.003 mM per percent above basal rate, 95% CI: 0.001-0.006, P = 0.003). The AUC for Rd rose by 1.26 mM during RE (95% CI: 0.41-2.10, P = 0.004) and increased proportionally with insulin infusion rate (0.04 mM per percent above basal rate, CI: 0.03-0.04, P < 0.001). No differences were observed between the moderate and high resistance groups. Noninsulin-mediated glucose utilization rose significantly during exercise before returning to baseline roughly 30-min postexercise. Insulin-mediated glucose utilization remained unchanged during exercise sessions. Circulating catecholamines and lactate rose during exercise despite relatively small changes observed in Rd. Results provide an explanation of why RE may pose a lower overall risk for hypoglycemia.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Aerobic exercise is known to cause decreases in blood glucose secondary to increased glucose utilization in people living with type 1 diabetes (T1D). However, less is known about how resistance-type exercise impacts glucose dynamics. Twenty-five participants with T1D performed in-clinic weight-bearing exercises under a glucose clamp. Mathematical modeling of infused glucose tracer allowed for quantification of the rate of hepatic glucose production as well as rates of insulin-mediated and noninsulin-mediated glucose uptake experienced during resistance exercise.

Exercise Prescription Principles among Physicians and Physical Therapists for Patients with Impaired Glucose Control: A Cross-Sectional Study

Exercise confers a multitude of benefits with limited adverse side effects, making it a powerful "medication" for a plethora of diseases. In people living with uncontrolled glucose levels, exercise can be an effective "medication" to assist in the management of hyperglycemia. We sought to survey healthcare providers (physicians and physical therapists) to determine the current state of exercise recommendation for people with glucose control issues. Healthcare providers were surveyed from six academic medical centers in the Midwest to determine the recommended exercise parameters (type, frequency, duration, intensity, and timing) for patients with glucose control issues. Data from 209 practitioners who completed the survey were used for analysis. Chi-square tests were used to determine differences in exercise recommendations between physical therapists (PTs) and physicians (MD/DOs). PTs and MD/DOs recommended similar exercise parameters. Of all respondents, 78.9% recommended exercise to patients with glucose control issues. Respondents who considered themselves to be active exercisers were more likely to recommend exercise than those who were not exercisers. Only 6.1% of all respondents recommended post-meal exercise. Healthcare providers overwhelmingly recommended exercise for people with glucose control issues, but the "timing" is not congruent with best practice recommendations.

Resistance Training as a Countermeasure in Women with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Review of Current Literature and Future Directions

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) poses a significant health concern for both mother and offspring. Exercise has emerged as a cornerstone of glycemic management in GDM. However, most research regarding this topic examines aerobic training (AT), despite substantial evidence for the effectiveness of resistance training (RT) in improving dysregulated glucose in other groups of people with diabetes, such as in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Thus, the purpose of this paper is to review research that examined the impact of RT on markers of glucose management in GDM, and to discuss future research directions to determine the benefits of RT in GDM. Based on the current evidence, RT is effective in reducing insulin requirement, especially in overweight women, reducing fasting glucose concentrations, and improving short-term postprandial glycemic control. However, the number of studies and findings limit conclusions about the impact of RT on risk of GDM, fasting insulin concentrations, insulin resistance, β-cell function, and intra-exercise glucose management. Overall, current evidence is accumulating to suggest that RT is a promising non-pharmacological tool to regulate circulating glucose concentrations in women with GDM, and a potential alternative or supplement to AT.

Simulation-Based Evaluation of Treatment Adjustment to Exercise in Type 1 Diabetes

Regular exercise is beneficial and recommended for people with type 1 diabetes, but increased glucose demand and changes in insulin sensitivity require treatment adjustments to prevent exercise-induced hypoglycemia. Several different adjustment strategies based on insulin bolus reductions and additional carbohydrate intake have been proposed, but large inter- and intraindividual variability and studies using different exercise duration, intensity, and timing impede a direct comparison of their effects. In this study, we use a mathematical model of the glucoregulatory system and implement published guidelines and strategies in-silico to provide a direct comparison on a single 'typical' person on a standard day with three meals. We augment this day by a broad range of exercise scenarios combining different intensity and duration of the exercise session, and different timing with respect to adjacent meals. We compare the resulting blood glucose trajectories and use summary measures to evaluate the time-in-range and risk scores for hypo- and hyperglycemic events for each simulation scenario, and to determine factors that impede prevention of hypoglycemia events. Our simulations suggest that the considered strategies and guidelines successfully minimize the risk for acute hypoglycemia. At the same time, all adjustments substantially increase the risk of late-onset hypoglycemia compared to no adjustment in many cases. We also find that timing between exercise and meals and additional carbohydrate intake during exercise can lead to non-intuitive behavior due to superposition of meal- and exercise-related glucose dynamics. Increased insulin sensitivity appears as a major driver of non-acute hypoglycemic events. Overall, our results indicate that further treatment adjustment might be required both immediately following exercise and up to several hours later, but that the intricate interplay between different dynamics makes it difficult to provide generic recommendations. However, our simulation scenarios extend substantially beyond the original scope of each model component and proper model validation is warranted before applying our in-silico results in a clinical setting.