Effects of hyperinsulinemia on the subsequent hormonal response to hypoglycemia in conscious dogs

Essentiality of portal vein receptors in hypoglycemic counterregulation: direct proof via denervation in male canines

A major issue of in the treatment of diabetes is the risk of hypoglycemia. Hypoglycemia is detected both centrally and peripherally in the porto-hepatic area. The portal locus for hypoglycemic detection was originally described using the "local irrigation of the liver" approach in a canine model. Further work using portal vein denervation (DEN) in a rodent model characterized portal hypoglycemic sensing in detail. However, recent controversy about the relevance of rodent findings to large animals and humans prompted us to investigate the effect of portal DEN on the hypoglycemic response in the canine, a species with multiple similarities to human glucose homeostasis. Hypoglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamps were performed in male canines, before (PRE) and after (POST) portal vein DEN or sham surgery (CON, control). Insulin (30 pmol/kg·min) and glucose (variable) were infused to slowly decrease systemic glycemia to 50 mg/dL over 160 minutes. The average plasma glucose during clamp steady state was: 2.9 ± 0.1 mmol DEN-PRE, 2.9 ± 0.2 mmol DEN-POST, 2.9 ± 0.1 mmol CON-PRE, and 2.8 ± 0.0 mmol CON-POST. There were no significant differences in plasma insulin between DEN and CON, PRE and POST experiments. The epinephrine response to hypoglycemia was reduced by 62% in DEN but not in CON. Steady-state cortisol was 46% lower after DEN but not after CON. Our study shows, in a large animal model, that surgical disconnection of the portal vein from the afferent pathway of the hypoglycemic counterregulatory circuitry results in a substantial suppression of the epinephrine response and a significant impact on cortisol response. These findings directly demonstrate an essential role for the portal vein in sensing hypoglycemia and relating glycemic information to the central nervous system.

Effects of diabetes and recurrent hypoglycemia on the regulation of the sympathoadrenal system and hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis

Epinephrine, norepinephrine, and corticosterone responses to hypoglycemia are impaired in diabetic rats. Recurrent hypoglycemia further diminishes epinephrine responses. This study examined the sympathoadrenal system and hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis for molecular adaptations underlying these defects. Groups were normal (N) and diabetic (D) rats and diabetic rats exposed to 4 days of 2 episodes/day of hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia (D-hypo) or hyperinsulinemic hyperglycemia (D-hyper). D-hypo and D-hyper rats differentiated effects of hypoglycemia and hyperinsulinemia. Adrenal tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) mRNA was reduced (P < 0.05 vs. N) 25% in all diabetic groups. Remarkably, mRNA for phenylethanolamine N-methyltransferase (PNMT), which converts norepinephrine to epinephrine, was reduced (P < 0.05 vs. all) 40% only in D-hypo rats. Paradoxically, dopamine beta-hydroxylase mRNA was elevated (P < 0.05 vs. D, D-hyper) in D-hypo rats. Hippocampal mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) mRNA was increased (P < 0.05 vs. N) in all diabetic groups. Hippocampal glucocorticoid receptor (GR), hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus (PVN) GR and corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH), and pituitary GR and proopiomelanocortin (POMC) mRNA levels did not differ. We conclude that blunted corticosterone responses to hypoglycemia in diabetic rats are not due to altered basal expression of GR, CRH, and POMC in the hippocampus, PVN, and pituitary. The corticosterone defect also does not appear to be due to increased hippocampal MR, since we have reported normalized corticosterone responses in D-hypo and D-hyper rats. Furthermore, impaired epinephrine counterregulation in diabetes is associated with reduced adrenal TH mRNA, whereas the additional epinephrine defect after recurrent hypoglycemia is associated with decreases in both TH and PNMT mRNA.

Cortisol acts through central mechanisms to blunt counterregulatory responses to hypoglycemia in conscious rats

Physiological levels of cortisol have been found to blunt neuroendocrine and metabolic responses to subsequent hypoglycemia in humans. The aim of this study was to determine whether cortisol acts directly on the brain to elicit this effect. A total of 41 conscious unrestrained Sprague-Dawley rats were studied during 2-day experiments. Day 1 consisted of two episodes of clamped 2-h hyperinsulinemic (30 pmol. kg(-1) x min(-1)) hypoglycemia (2.8 +/- 0.1 mmol/l; n = 12; ANTE HYPO), euglycemia (6.2 +/- 0.1 mmol/l; n = 12; ANTE EUG), or euglycemia (6.2 +/- 0.1 mmol/l) plus simultaneous intracerebroventricular (ICV) infusion of cortisol (25 microg/h; n = 9; ANTE EUG+Cort) or saline (24 microl/h; n = 8; ANTE EUG+Sal). For all groups, day 2 consisted of a 2-h hyperinsulinemic (30 pmol x kg(-1) x min(-1)) hypoglycemic (2.9 +/- 0.2 mmol/l) clamp. Plasma epinephrine and glucagon incremental area under the curve (Delta AUC) responses were significantly less in ANTE EUG+Cort and ANTE HYPO versus both ANTE EUG and ANTE EUG+Sal (P < 0.05). The Delta AUC responses of plasma norepinephrine were significantly lower in ANTE EUG+Cort versus both ANTE EUG and ANTE EUG+Sal (P < 0.05). Endogenous glucose production was significantly less in ANTE HYPO and ANTE EUG+Cort versus the other groups (P < 0.05). Lastly, the glucose infusion rate to maintain the desired hypoglycemia was significantly greater in ANTE EUG+Cort and ANTE HYPO versus the other two groups (P < 0.05). In summary, ICV infusion of cortisol significantly blunted norepinephrine, epinephrine, glucagon, and endogenous glucose production responses to next-day hypoglycemia. We conclude that cortisol can act directly on the central nervous system to blunt counterregulatory responses to subsequent hypoglycemia in the conscious rat.

Control of postprandial plasma glucose by an oral insulin product (HIM2) in patients with type 2 diabetes

OBJECTIVE

The objectives of this exploratory study were to assess the postprandial glucose-lowering effects and evaluate the safety and tolerability of single, escalating doses of an oral insulin product, hexyl-insulin monoconjugate 2 (HIM2), in patients with type 2 diabetes. Subcutaneous insulin and oral placebo were also administered for comparison.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Eighteen patients with type 2 diabetes were enrolled in this randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled, three-way crossover, dose-escalation study. A single dose of each of the following study drugs was administered to each patient on 3 separate days: oral HIM2 (at one of three dose levels: 0.375, 0.5, or 1.0 mg/kg), subcutaneous regular insulin (8 units Humulin R), and oral placebo. At 30 min after dosing, patients ingested a standardized test meal (16 oz/720 calories of Boost Plus). Serial blood samples were collected for determination of plasma glucose and insulin concentrations during the 4-h postdose period.

RESULTS

The mean glucose area under the curve for 0 to 240 min (AUC(0-240)) values were lower following administration of 0.5 and 1.0 mg/kg HIM2 vs. placebo (1,097.1 vs. 1,196.9 and 801.1 vs. 992.1 mg x h(-1) x dl(-1), respectively). This difference was statistically significant at the 1.0-mg/kg HIM2 dose level. Insulin exposure, as measured by insulin AUC(0-240) values, for the 0.375-, 0.5-, and 1.0-mg/kg dose levels of HIM2 were 169.9, 193.1, and 230.8 micro U x h(-1) x ml(-1), respectively; insulin AUC(0-240) values for placebo were 165.8, 196.1, and 169.2 micro U x h(-1) x ml(-1), respectively. The mean glucose AUC(0-240) values were similar following administration of 0.5 and 1.0 mg/kg HIM2 vs. subcutaneous insulin (1,097.1 vs. 1,048.0 and 801.1 vs. 875.2 mg x h(-1) x dl(-1), respectively). For pooled data from the 0.5- and 1.0-mg/kg dose groups, the HIM2/subcutaneous insulin ratios for the 2-h postprandial glucose concentration (0.97, 95% CI 0.90-1.06), maximum postprandial glucose concentration (0.99, 95% CI 0.93-1.06), and glucose AUC(0-240) (0.98, 95% CI 0.9-1.06) were within 10% of unity, implying glucodynamic equivalence. Although HIM2 (0.5 and 1.0 mg/kg) and subcutaneous insulin (8 units) provided comparable control of postprandial plasma glucose concentrations, HIM2 resulted in peripheral insulin concentrations that were lower than subcutaneous insulin (mean insulin AUC(0-240) of 193.1 vs. 233.6 and 230.8 vs. 270.3 micro U x h(-1) x ml(-1), respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Single, oral doses of HIM2 were safe and well tolerated. HIM2 (0.5 and 1.0 mg/kg) was more effective than placebo and as effective as subcutaneous regular insulin (8 units) at controlling postprandial glycemia with respect to the following parameters: 2-h postprandial glucose concentration, maximum glucose concentration, and glucose AUC(0-240). This occurred even though peripheral insulin concentrations were lower following the administration of HIM2 (0.5 and 1.0 mg/kg) than subcutaneous insulin. Thus, HIM2 therapy may control postprandial glycemia without causing peripheral hyperinsulinemia in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Effects of recurrent hyperinsulinemia with and without hypoglycemia on counterregulation in diabetic rats

To understand the mechanisms whereby recurrent hypoglycemia increases the risk of subsequent hypoglycemia, it was necessary to differentiate the effects of recurrent hyperinsulinemia from those of hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia. We examined basal and hypoglycemic endocrine function in normal rats, streptozotocin-diabetic controls, and diabetic rats exposed to 4 days of 2 episodes/day of hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia (DH) or hyperinsulinemic hyperglycemia (DI). DH and DI rats differentiated the effects of hyperinsulinemia from those of hypoglycemia. In diabetic controls, basal plasma ACTH tended to be increased, and plasma corticosterone, plasma somatostatin, and pancreatic prosomatostatin and proglucagon mRNA were increased (P < 0.05) vs. normal rats. These parameters were normalized in DH and DI rats. In diabetic controls, glucagon, epinephrine, norepinephrine, corticosterone, and peak glucose production responses to hypoglycemia were reduced (P < 0.05) vs. normal rats. In DI rats, epinephrine responses were normalized. Conversely, DH rats displayed marked further impairment of epinephrine and glucose production responses and increased peripheral insulin sensitivity (P < 0.05 vs. diabetic controls). Both insulin regimens partially normalized glucagon and fully normalized norepinephrine and corticosterone responses. In summary, recurrent hyperinsulinemia in diabetic rats normalized most pituitary-adrenal, sympathoadrenal, and pancreatic parameters. However, concurrent hypoglycemia further impaired epinephrine and glucose production responses and increased insulin sensitivity. We conclude that 1) recurrent hypoglycemia may increase the risk of subsequent hypoglycemia by increasing insulin sensitivity, and 2) epinephrine counterregulation is particularly sensitive to impairment by recurrent hypoglycemia.

Effects of antecedent hypoglycemia, hyperinsulinemia, and excess corticosterone on hypoglycemic counterregulation

This study aimed to differentiate the effects of repeated antecedent hypoglycemia, antecedent marked hyperinsulinemia, and antecedent increases in corticosterone on counterregulation to subsequent hypoglycemia in normal rats. Specifically, we examined whether exposure to hyperinsulinemia or elevated corticosterone per se could impair subsequent counterregulation. Four groups of male Sprague-Dawley rats were used: 1) normal controls (N) had 4 days of sham antecedent treatment; 2) an antecedent hypoglycemia group (AH) had 7 episodes of hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia over 4 days; 3) an antecedent hyperinsulinemia group (AE) had 7 episodes of hyperinsulinemic euglycemia; and 4) an antecedent corticosterone group (AC) had 7 episodes of intravenous corticosterone to simulate the hypoglycemic corticosterone levels in AH rats. On day 5, hyperinsulinemic euglycemic-hypoglycemic clamps were performed. Epinephrine responses to hypoglycemia were impaired (P < 0.05 vs. N) after antecedent hypoglycemia and hyperinsulinemia. This correlated with diminished (P < 0.05 vs. N) absolute glucose production responses in AH rats and diminished incremental glucose production responses in AE rats. Paradoxically, norepinephrine responses were increased (P < 0.05 vs. N) after antecedent hypoglycemia. Glucagon and corticosterone responses were unaffected by antecedent hypoglycemia and hyperinsulinemia. In AC rats, incremental but not absolute glucose production responses were decreased (P < 0.05 vs. N). However, neuroendocrine counterregulation was unaltered. We conclude that both antecedent hypoglycemia and hyperinsulinemia impair epinephrine and glucose production responses to subsequent hypoglycemia, suggesting that severe recurrent hyperinsulinemia may contribute to the development of hypoglycemia-associated autonomic failure.