Autonomic cardiovascular control during exercise

Effects of High-Intensity Interval Training Using the 3/7 Resistance Training Method on Metabolic Stress in People with Heart Failure and Coronary Artery Disease: A Randomized Cross-Over Study

The 3/7 resistance training (RT) method involves performing sets with increasing numbers of repetitions, and shorter rest periods than the 3x9 method. Therefore, it could induce more metabolic stress in people with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) or coronary artery disease (CAD). This randomized cross-over study tested this hypothesis. Eleven individuals with HFrEF and thirteen with CAD performed high-intensity interval training (HIIT) for 30 min, followed by 3x9 or 3/7 RT according to group allocation. pH, HCO3-, lactate, and growth hormone were measured at baseline, after HIIT, and after RT. pH and HCO3- decreased, and lactate increased after both RT methods. In the CAD group, lactate increased more (6.99 ± 2.37 vs. 9.20 ± 3.57 mmol/L, p = 0.025), pH tended to decrease more (7.29 ± 0.06 vs. 7.33 ± 0.04, p = 0.060), and HCO3- decreased more (18.6 ± 3.1 vs. 21.1 ± 2.5 mmol/L, p = 0.004) after 3/7 than 3x9 RT. In the HFrEF group, lactate, pH, and HCO3- concentrations did not differ between RT methods (all p > 0.248). RT did not increase growth hormone in either patient group. In conclusion, the 3/7 RT method induced more metabolic stress than the 3x9 method in people with CAD but not HFrEF.

Neural control of the circulation during exercise in heart failure with reduced and preserved ejection fraction

Patients with heart failure with reduced (HFrEF) and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) exhibit severe exercise intolerance that may be due, in part, to inappropriate cardiovascular and hemodynamic adjustments to exercise. Several neural mechanisms and locally released vasoactive substances work in concert through complex interactions to ensure proper adjustments to meet the metabolic demands of the contracting skeletal muscle. Specifically, accumulating evidence suggests that disease-related alterations in neural mechanisms (e.g., central command, exercise pressor reflex, arterial baroreflex, and cardiopulmonary baroreflex) contribute to heightened sympathetic activation and impaired ability to attenuate sympathetic vasoconstrictor responsiveness that may contribute to reduced skeletal muscle blood flow and severe exercise intolerance in patients with HFrEF. In contrast, little is known regarding these important aspects of physiology in patients with HFpEF, though emerging data reveal heightened sympathetic activation and attenuated skeletal muscle blood flow during exercise in this patient population that may be attributable to dysregulated neural control of the circulation. The overall goal of this review is to provide a brief overview of the current understanding of disease-related alterations in the integrative neural cardiovascular responses to exercise in both HFrEF and HFpEF phenotypes, with a focus on sympathetic nervous system regulation during exercise.

The exercise pressor reflex - a pressure-raising mechanism with a limited role in regulating leg perfusion during locomotion in young healthy men

We investigated the role of the exercise pressor reflex (EPR) in regulating the haemodynamic response to locomotor exercise. Eight healthy participants (23 ± 3 years,V ̇ O 2 max ${\dot V_{{{\mathrm{O}}_{\mathrm{2}}}{\mathrm{max}}}}$ : 49 ± 6 ml/kg/min) performed constant-load cycling exercise (∼36/43/52/98%V ̇ O 2 max ${\dot V_{{{\mathrm{O}}_{\mathrm{2}}}{\mathrm{max}}}}$ ; 4 min each) without (CTRL) and with (FENT) lumbar intrathecal fentanyl attenuating group III/IV locomotor muscle afferent feedback and, thus, the EPR. To avoid different respiratory muscle metaboreflex and arterial chemoreflex activation during FENT, subjects mimicked the ventilatory response recorded during CTRL. Arterial and leg perfusion pressure (femoral arterial and venous catheters), femoral blood flow (Doppler-ultrasound), microvascular quadriceps blood flow index (indocyanine green), cardiac output (inert gas breathing), and systemic and leg vascular conductance were quantified during exercise. There were no cardiovascular and ventilatory differences between conditions at rest. Pulmonary ventilation, arterial blood gases and oxyhaemoglobin saturation were not different during exercise. Furthermore, cardiac output (-2% to -12%), arterial pressure (-7% to -15%) and leg perfusion pressure (-8% to -22%) were lower, and systemic (up to 16%) and leg (up to 27%) vascular conductance were higher during FENT compared to CTRL. Leg blood flow, microvascular quadriceps blood flow index, and leg O2 -transport and utilization were not different between conditions (P > 0.5). These findings reflect a critical role of the EPR in the autonomic control of the heart, vasculature and, ultimately, arterial pressure during locomotor exercise. However, the lack of a net effect of the EPR on leg blood flow challenges the idea of this cardiovascular reflex as a key determinant of leg O2 -transport during locomotor exercise in healthy, young individuals. KEY POINTS: The role of the exercise pressor reflex (EPR) in regulating leg O2 -transport during human locomotion remains uncertain. We investigated the influence of the EPR on the cardiovascular response to cycling exercise. Lumbar intrathecal fentanyl was used to block group III/IV leg muscle afferents and debilitate the EPR at intensities ranging from 30% to 100%V ̇ O 2 max ${\dot V_{{{\mathrm{O}}_{\mathrm{2}}}{\mathrm{max}}}}$ . To avoid different respiratory muscle metaboreflex and arterial chemoreflex activation during exercise with blocked leg muscle afferents, subjects mimicked the ventilatory response recorded during control exercise. Afferent blockade increased leg and systemic vascular conductance, but reduced cardiac output and arterial-pressure, with no net effect on leg blood flow. The EPR influenced the cardiovascular response to cycling exercise by contributing to the autonomic control of the heart and vasculature, but did not affect leg blood flow. These findings challenge the idea of the EPR as a key determinant of leg O2 -transport during locomotor exercise in healthy, young individuals.