β-Adrenergic blockade enhances coronary vasoconstrictor response to forehead cooling

Effects of alpha-adrenergic receptor blockade on coronary circulation in postmenopausal women

We sought to investigate the effect of the α1-adrenergic receptor blockade during handgrip exercise (Grip), isolated metaboreflex activation (Metabo), and cold pressor test (CPT) on coronary circulation in young (YW) and postmenopausal women (PMW). Ten YW and 9 PMW underwent two protocols: (1) 3 min of baseline followed by 3 min of CPT and (2) 3 min of rest, 3 min of Grip followed by 3 min of Metabo. Protocols were carried out under control conditions and α1-adrenergic receptor blockade (oral prazosin 0.03 mg·kg-1). Coronary blood velocity (CBV) and vascular conductance (CCI) were lower in PMW. Grip increased CBV only in YW (YW: Δ18.0 ± 21.1% vs. PMW: Δ4.2 ± 10.1%; p < 0.05), and the blockade did not change the CBV response to Grip in YW and PMW. During the Metabo, CBV returned to resting levels in YW and was unchanged from rest in PMW, before (YW:Δ1.7 ± 8.7% vs. PMW: Δ- 1.5 ± 8.6) and under the blockade (YW: Δ4.5 ± 14.8% vs. PMW: Δ9.1 ± 29.5%). CPT did not change CBV in both groups (YW: Δ3.9 ± 8.0 vs. PMW: Δ- 4.1 ± 6.2%), following the α1-blockade, CPT increased CBV only in YW (YW: Δ11.2 ± 12.8% vs. PMW: Δ2.2 ± 7.1%; p < 0.05 for group and condition). CCI decreased during Grip, Metabo, and CPT in YW and PMW, while the blockade prevented that decrease only in YW. The α1-adrenergic receptor plays a role in the control of coronary circulation in young women, evoking stronger vasoconstriction during CPT than Grip and Metabo in YW. PMW have impaired vasomotor control in the coronary circulation, which seems not to be caused by the α1-adrenergic receptor.

Sympathetic control of the coronary circulation during trigeminal nerve stimulation in humans

PURPOSE

We sought to investigate the sympathetic mechanism controlling coronary circulation during trigeminal nerve stimulation in healthy women.

METHODS

The protocol consisted of 3 min of trigeminal nerve stimulation (TGS) with cold stimuli to the face, in two conditions: (1) control and β-blockade (oral propranolol), and (2) control and α-blockade (oral prazosin).

RESULTS

Thirty-one healthy young subjects (women: n = 13; men: n = 18) participated in the study. By design, TGS decreased heart rate (HR), and increased blood pressure (BP) and cardiac output (CO). Before the β-blockade coronary blood velocity (CBV-Δ1.4 ± 1.3 cm s-1) increased along with the decrease of coronary vascular conductance index (CVCi-Δ-0.04 ± 0.04 cm s-1 mmHg-1) during TGS and the β-blockade abolished the CBV increase and a further decrease of CVCi was observed with TGS (Δ-0.06 ± 0.07 cm s-1 mmHg-1). During the α-blockade condition before the blockade, the CBV increased (Δ0.93 ± 1.48 cm s-1) along with the decrease of CVCi (Δ-0.05 ± 1.12 cm s-1 mmHg-1) during TGS, after the α-blockade CBV (Δ0.98 ± cm s-1) and CVCi (Δ-0.03 ± 0.06 cm s-1 mmHg-1) response to TGS did not change.

CONCLUSION

Coronary circulation increases during sympathetic stimulation even with a decrease in heart rate.

Sympathetic and sensory nerve fiber function in multiple system atrophy and idiopathic Parkinson's disease

OBJECTIVE

To explore small fiber somatosensory and sympathetic function in PD and MSA.

METHODS

We recruited 20 PD patients (7 women, median age 65.5 years; IQR 54.75-70.0), 10 MSA patients (4 women; median age 68 years; IQR 66.25-74.0), and 10 healthy subjects (HC; 4 women, median age 68; IQR 59.0-71.0 years). Autonomic testing included forehead cooling, intradermal microdialysis of norepinephrine (NE; 10^-5; 10^-6; 10^-7; and 10^-8), and orthostatic hypotension (OH); somatosensory testing included quantitative sensory testing (QST) according to the protocol of the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain (DFNS).

RESULTS

OH occurred more frequently in PD (p = 0.018) and MSA (p = 0.002) compared to HC. Vasoconstriction responses were stronger in PD compared to MSA during forehead cooling (p = 0.044) and microdialysis of physiologically concentrated NE solutions (10^-7; 10-8; p = 0.017). PD and MSA had impaired cold (PD: p < 0.01; MSA: p < 0.05) and warm detection thresholds (PD and MSA, both p < 0.05). The mechanical detection threshold was higher in PD (p < 0.01). Conversely, mechanical pain thresholds were decreased in PD and MSA (both p < 0.001), indicating mechanical hyperalgesia.

CONCLUSION

In contrast to MSA, we found evidence of peripheral adrenoreceptor hypersensitivity in PD, probably caused by peripheral sympathetic denervation. Sensory testing revealed peripheral neuropathy and central pain sensitization in PD and MSA. Jointly, our data demonstrate autonomic and somatosensory dysfunction in PD and MSA.

Difference in the integrated effects of sympathetic vasoconstriction and local vasodilation in human skeletal muscle and skin microvasculature

We investigated the integration of sympathetic vasoconstriction and local vasodilation in the skeletal muscle and skin microvasculature of humans. In 39 healthy volunteers, we simultaneously measured the blood flow index in the flexor carpi radialis muscle using diffuse correlation spectroscopy and the skin using laser‐Doppler flowmetry. We examined the effects of acute sympathoexcitation induced by forehead cooling on relatively weak and robust vasodilatory responses during postocclusive reactive hyperemia (PORH) induced by 70‐sec and 10‐min arterial occlusion in the upper arm. To increase sympathetic tone during PORH, forehead cooling was begun 60 sec before the occlusion release and ended 60 sec after the release. In the 70‐sec occlusion trials, acute sympathoexcitation reduced the peak and duration of vasodilation in both skeletal muscle and skin. The inhibition of vasodilation by sympathoexcitation was blunted in both tissues by the robust vasodilatory stimulation produced by the 10‐min occlusion, and the degree of blunting was greater in skeletal muscle than in skin, especially the initial and peak responses. Sympathoexcitation reduced the peak vasodilation only in skin, while it accelerated the initial vasodilation only in skeletal muscle. However, the decline in vasodilation after the peak was significantly hastened in skeletal muscle, shortening the duration of the vasodilation. We conclude that, in humans, the integration of sympathetic vasoconstriction and local vasodilation has different effects in skeletal muscle and skin and is likely an important contributor to the selective control of perfusion in the microcirculations of different tissues.

Reduced central sympathetic activity in Parkinson's disease

OBJECTIVE

With a combination of different sympathetic tests, we aimed to elucidate whether impairment of sympathetic function in Parkinson's disease (PD) is the consequence of a central or peripheral efferent dysfunction.

METHODS

Thirty-five patients with early-to-intermediate PD (median age: 63 years; IQR: 57-67 years; disease duration 1-9 years, 15 women) and 20 age- and sex-matched healthy controls (median age: 64.5 years; IQR: 58-68 years; 10 women) were recruited. Autonomic testing was performed in two subgroups and included the assessment of resting cardiovascular parameters, postprandial hypotension (PPH), orthostatic hypotension (OH), and vasoconstriction induced by intradermal microdialysis with different concentrations of norepinephrine (NE; 10^-5 ; 10^-6 ; 10^-7 ; 10^-8 ) and by cold through forehead cooling. We also used sympathetic multiunit microneurography (muscle sympathetic nerve activity; MSNA; burst frequency (BF): bursts per minute; burst incidence (BI): bursts per 100 heart beats) and evaluated the presence of phosphorylated α-synuclein deposits in skin innervation in biopsies from the thighs by immunohistohemistry.

RESULTS

Diastolic blood pressure was higher in the PD group at rest (p < .001) and during OH (F = 6.533; p = .022). Vasoconstriction induced by NE microdialysis and cold was unchanged in PD patients. MSNA was lower in PD patients than in controls (BF: p = .001; BI: p = .025). Phosphorylated α-synuclein deposits could be found only in PD patients.

CONCLUSION

We did not find indications for peripheral sympathetic nerve fiber dysfunction or adrenoreceptor sensitivity changes. The decreased MSNA argues in favor of central sympathetic impairment.

Sympathoexcitation constrains vasodilation in the human skeletal muscle microvasculature during postocclusive reactive hyperemia

We used diffuse correlation spectroscopy to investigate sympathetic vasoconstriction, local vasodilation, and integration of these two responses in the skeletal muscle microvasculature of 20 healthy volunteers. Diffuse correlation spectroscopy probes were placed on the flexor carpi radialis muscle or vastus lateralis muscle, and a blood flow index was derived continuously. We measured hemodynamic responses during sympathoexcitation induced by forehead cooling, after which the effects of the increased sympathetic tone on vasodilatory responses during postocclusive reactive hyperemia (PORH) were examined. PORH was induced by releasing arterial occlusion (3 min) in an arm or leg. To increase sympathetic tone during PORH, forehead cooling was begun 60 s before the occlusion release and ended 60 s after the release. During forehead cooling, mean arterial pressure rose significantly and was sustained at an elevated level. Significant vasoconstriction and decreases in blood flow index followed by gradual blunting of the vasoconstriction also occurred. The time course of these responses is in good agreement with previous observations in animals. The acute sympathoexcitation diminished the peak vasodilation during PORH only in the vastus lateralis muscle, but it hastened the decline in vasodilation after the peak in both the flexor carpi radialis muscle and vastus lateralis muscle. Consequently, the total vasodilatory response assessed as the area of the vascular conductance during the first minute of PORH was significantly diminished in both regions. We conclude that, in humans, the integrated effects of sympathetic vasoconstriction and local vasodilation have an important role in vascular regulation and control of perfusion in the skeletal muscle microcirculation.

NEW & NOTEWORTHY We used diffuse correlation spectroscopy to demonstrate that acute sympathoexcitation constrains local vasodilation in the human skeletal muscle microvasculature during postocclusive reactive hyperemia. This finding indicates that integration of sympathetic vasoconstriction and local vasodilation is importantly involved in vascular regulation and the control of perfusion of the skeletal muscle microcirculation in humans.

Beta-1 vs. beta-2 adrenergic control of coronary blood flow during isometric handgrip exercise in humans

During exercise, β-adrenergic receptors are activated throughout the body. In healthy humans, the net effect of β-adrenergic stimulation is an increase in coronary blood flow. However, the role of vascular β1 vs. β2 receptors in coronary exercise hyperemia is not clear. In this study, we simultaneously measured noninvasive indexes of myocardial oxygen supply (i.e., blood velocity in the left anterior descending coronary artery; Doppler echocardiography) and demand [i.e., rate pressure product (RPP) = heart rate × systolic blood pressure) and tested the hypothesis that β1 blockade with esmolol improves coronary exercise hyperemia compared with nonselective β-blockade with propranolol. Eight healthy young men received intravenous infusions of esmolol, propranolol, and saline on three separate days in a single-blind, randomized, crossover design. During each infusion, subjects performed isometric handgrip exercise until fatigue. Blood pressure, heart rate, and coronary blood velocity (CBV) were measured continuously, and RPP was calculated. Changes in parameters from baseline were compared with paired t-tests. Esmolol (Δ = 3296 ± 1204) and propranolol (Δ = 2997 ± 699) caused similar reductions in peak RPP compared with saline (Δ = 5384 ± 1865). In support of our hypothesis, ΔCBV with esmolol was significantly greater than with propranolol (7.3 ± 2.4 vs. 4.5 ± 1.6 cm/s; P = 0.002). This effect was also evident when normalizing ΔCBV to ΔRPP. In summary, not only does selective β1 blockade reduce myocardial oxygen demand during exercise, but it also unveils β2-receptor-mediated coronary exercise hyperemia.NEW & NOTEWORTHY In this study, we evaluated the role of vascular β1 vs. β2 receptors in coronary exercise hyperemia in a single-blind, randomized, crossover study in healthy men. In response to isometric handgrip exercise, blood flow velocity in the left anterior descending coronary artery was significantly greater with esmolol compared with propranolol. These findings increase our understanding of the individual and combined roles of coronary β1 and β2 adrenergic receptors in humans.

Esmolol infusion versus propranolol infusion: effects on heart rate and blood pressure in healthy volunteers

Despite its widespread clinical use, the β1-adrenergic receptor antagonist esmolol hydrochloride is not commonly used in human physiology research, and the effective dose of esmolol (compared with the nonselective β-blocker propranolol) is unclear. In four separate studies we used cycle ergometry exercise and infusions of isoproterenol and epinephrine to test the heart rate (HR)-lowering effect of esmolol compared with propranolol and saline in healthy humans. In cohort 1, both esmolol (ΔHR 57 ± 6 beats/min) and propranolol (ΔHR 56 ± 7 beats/min) attenuated exercise tachycardia compared with saline (ΔHR 88 ± 17 beats/min). In cohort 2, we found that the HR response to exercise was similar at 5 min (ΔHR 57 ± 9 beats/min) and 60 min (ΔHR 55 ± 9 beats/min) after initiation of the esmolol maintenance infusion. In cohort 3, we confirmed that the HR-lowering effect of esmolol disappeared 45 min after termination of the maintenance infusion. In cohort 4, changes in femoral blood flow and hematological parameters in response to epinephrine infusion were not different between esmolol and saline infusion, indicating that our esmolol infusion paradigm does not block β2-receptors. Collectively, our data indicate that infusion of ~160 mg of esmolol (range 110-200 mg in the 5 min before exercise) acutely and selectively blocks β1-receptors in healthy humans. Additionally, β1-receptors remain blocked 60 min later if a maintenance infusion of ~0.2 mg·kg total body mass-1·min-1 continues. The current data lay the foundation for future studies to evaluate β1- vs. β2-receptor control of the circulation in humans.NEW & NOTEWORTHY We used cycle ergometry exercise and infusions of isoproterenol and epinephrine to test the heart rate-lowering effect of esmolol compared with propranolol and saline in healthy humans. Collectively, our data indicate that infusion of ~160 mg of esmolol (range 110-200 mg in the 5 min before exercise) acutely and selectively blocks β1-adrenergic receptors. These infusion parameters can be used in future experiments to evaluate β1- vs. β2-receptor control of the circulation in humans.

Effect of adrenergic agonists on coronary blood flow: a laboratory study in healthy volunteers

Myocardial oxygen supply and demand mismatch is fundamental to the pathophysiology of ischemia and infarction. The sympathetic nervous system, through α‐adrenergic receptors and β‐adrenergic receptors, influences both myocardial oxygen supply and demand. In animal models, mechanistic studies have established that adrenergic receptors contribute to coronary vascular tone. The purpose of this laboratory study was to noninvasively quantify coronary responses to adrenergic receptor stimulation in humans. Fourteen healthy volunteers (11 men and 3 women) performed isometric handgrip exercise to fatigue followed by intravenous infusion of isoproterenol. A subset of individuals also received infusions of phenylephrine (n = 6), terbutaline (n = 10), and epinephrine (n = 4); all dosages were based on fat‐free mass and were infused slowly to achieve steady‐state. The left anterior descending coronary artery was visualized using Doppler echocardiography. Beat‐by‐beat heart rate (HR), blood pressure (BP), peak diastolic coronary velocity (CBVpeak), and coronary velocity time integral were calculated. Data are presented as M ± SD. Isometric handgrip elicited significant increases in BP, HR, and CBVpeak (from 23.3 ± 5.3 to 34.5 ± 9.9 cm/sec). Isoproterenol raised HR and CBVpeak (from 22.6 ± 4.8 to 43.9 ± 12.4 cm/sec). Terbutaline and epinephrine evoked coronary hyperemia whereas phenylephrine did not significantly alter CBVpeak. Different indices of coronary hyperemia (changes in CBVpeak and velocity time integral) were significantly correlated (R = 0.803). The current data indicate that coronary hyperemia occurs in healthy humans in response to isometric handgrip exercise and low‐dose, steady‐state infusions of isoproterenol, terbutaline, and epinephrine. The contribution of β1 versus β2 receptors to coronary hyperemia remains to be determined. In this echocardiographic study, we demonstrate that coronary blood flow increases when β‐adrenergic receptors are stimulated (i.e., during exercise and different intravenous infusions). Our infusion paradigms and beat‐by‐beat imaging methodologies can be used in future studies to evaluate age‐, sex‐, and disease‐ differences in adrenergic control of coronary blood flow.

Coronary Exercise Hyperemia Is Impaired in Patients with Peripheral Arterial Disease

BACKGROUND

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is an atherosclerotic vascular disease that affects over 200 million people worldwide. The hallmark of PAD is ischemic leg pain and this condition is also associated with an augmented blood pressure response to exercise, impaired vascular function, and high risk of myocardial infarction and cardiovascular mortality. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that coronary exercise hyperemia is impaired in PAD.

METHODS

Twelve patients with PAD and no overt coronary disease (65 ± 2 years, 7 men) and 15 healthy control subjects (64 ± 2 years, 9 men) performed supine plantar flexion exercise (30 contractions/min, increasing workload). A subset of subjects (n = 7 PAD, n = 8 healthy) also performed isometric handgrip exercise (40% of maximum voluntary contraction to fatigue). Coronary blood velocity in the left anterior descending artery was measured by transthoracic Doppler echocardiography; blood pressure and heart rate were monitored continuously.

RESULTS

Coronary blood velocity responses to 4 min of plantar flexion exercise (PAD: Δ2.4 ± 1.2, healthy: Δ6.0 ± 1.6 cm/sec, P = 0.039) and isometric handgrip exercise (PAD: Δ8.3 ± 4.2, healthy: Δ16.9 ± 3.6, P = 0.033) were attenuated in PAD patients.

CONCLUSION

These data indicate that coronary exercise hyperemia is impaired in PAD, which may predispose these patients to myocardial ischemia.

β-Adrenergic receptor blockade impairs coronary exercise hyperemia in young men but not older men

Patients with coronary artery disease have attenuated coronary vasodilator responses to physiological stress, which is partially attributed to a β-adrenergic receptor (β-AR)-mediated mechanisms. Whether β-ARs contribute to impaired coronary vasodilation seen with healthy aging is unknown. The purpose of this study was to investigate the role of β-ARs in coronary exercise hyperemia in healthy humans. Six young men (26 ± 1 yr) and seven older men (67 ± 4 yr) performed isometric handgrip exercise at 30% maximal voluntary contraction for 2 min after receiving intravenous propranolol, a β-AR antagonist, and no treatment. Isoproterenol, a β-AR agonist, was infused to confirm the β-AR blockade. Blood pressure and heart rate were monitored continuously, and coronary blood flow velocity (CBV, left anterior descending artery) was measured by transthoracic Doppler echocardiography. Older men had an attenuated ΔCBV to isometric exercise (3.8 ± 1.3 vs. 9.7 ± 2.1 cm/s, P = 0.02) compared with young men. Propranolol decreased the ΔCBV at peak handgrip exercise in young men (9.7 ± 2.1 vs. 2.7 ± 0.9 cm/s, P = 0.008). However, propranolol had no effect on ΔCBV in older men (3.8 ± 1.3 vs. 4.2 ± 1.9 cm/s, P = 0.9). Older men also had attenuated coronary hyperemia to low-dose isoproterenol. These data indicate that β-AR control of coronary blood flow is impaired in healthy older men.

Coronary responses to cold air inhalation following afferent and efferent blockade

Cardiac ischemia and angina pectoris are commonly experienced during exertion in a cold environment. In the current study we tested the hypotheses that oropharyngeal afferent blockade (i.e., local anesthesia of the upper airway with lidocaine) as well as systemic β-adrenergic receptor blockade (i.e., intravenous propranolol) would improve the balance between myocardial oxygen supply and demand in response to the combined stimulus of cold air inhalation (-15 to -30°C) and isometric handgrip exercise (Cold + Grip). Young healthy subjects underwent Cold + Grip following lidocaine, propranolol, and control (no drug). Heart rate, blood pressure, and coronary blood flow velocity (CBV, from Doppler echocardiography) were continuously measured. Rate-pressure product (RPP) was calculated, and changes from baseline were compared between treatments. The change in RPP at the end of Cold + Grip was not different between lidocaine (2,441 ± 376) and control conditions (3,159 ± 626); CBV responses were also not different between treatments. With propranolol, heart rate (8 ± 1 vs. 14 ± 3 beats/min) and RPP responses to Cold + Grip were significantly attenuated. However, at peak exercise propranolol also resulted in a smaller ΔCBV (1.4 ± 0.8 vs. 5.3 ± 1.4 cm/s, P = 0.035), such that the relationship between coronary flow and cardiac metabolism was impaired under propranolol (0.43 ± 0.37 vs. 2.1 ± 0.63 arbitrary units). These data suggest that cold air breathing and isometric exercise significantly influence efferent control of coronary blood flow. Additionally, β-adrenergic vasodilation may play a significant role in coronary regulation during exercise.