Human neuropeptide Y potentiates alpha1-adrenergic blood pressure responses in vivo

Kinetics of neuropeptide Y, catecholamines, and physiological responses during moderate and heavy intensity exercises

Neuropeptide Y 1-36 (NPY1-36) is a vasoconstrictor peptide co-secreted with norepinephrine (NE) by nerve endings during sympathetic activation. NPY1-36 potentiates NE action post-synaptically through the stimulation of the Y1 receptor, whereas its metabolite NPY3-36 resulting from DPP4 action activates Y2 presynaptic receptors, inhibiting NE and acetylcholine secretion. The secretions of NPY1-36 and NPY3-36 in response to sympathetic nervous system activation have not been studied due to the lack of analytical techniques available to distinguish them. We determined in healthy volunteers NPY1-36, NPY3-36 and catecholamine kinetics and how these neurotransmitters modulate the physiological stress response during and after moderate- and heavy-intensity exercises. Six healthy males participated in this randomized, double-blind, saxagliptin vs placebo crossover study. The volunteers performed an orthostatic test, a 30-min exercise at moderate intensity and a 15-min exercise at heavy intensity each followed by 50 min of recovery in two separate sessions with saxagliptin or placebo. Oxygen consumption (V̇O₂), ventilation and heart rate were continuously recorded. NE, epinephrine, NPY1-36 and NPY3-36 were quantified by tandem mass spectrometry. We found that exercise triggers NPY1-36 and NE secretion in an intensity-dependent manner and that NE returns faster to the baseline concentration than NPY1-36 after exercise. NPY3-36 rises during recovery parallel to the decline of NPY1-36. Saxagliptin reverses the NPY1-36/NPY3-36 ratio but does not affect hemodynamics, nor NPY1-36 and catecholamine concentrations. We found that NPY1-36 half-life is considerably shorter than previously established with immunoassays. NPY1-36 and NE secretions are finely regulated to prevent an excessive physiological Y1 stimulating response to submaximal exercise.

Effects of muscle sympathetic burst size and burst pattern on time-to-peak sympathetic transduction

The current study evaluated the influence of resting muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) burst size and firing pattern on time-to-peak sympathetic transduction in 36 young healthy men and women. Participants underwent a 5-10 min resting baseline with beat-to-beat measures of heart rate, mean arterial pressure (MAP), and MSNA (microneurography). Cardiac output and total vascular conductance were calculated using the Modelflow algorithm. Sympathetic transduction was quantified using the burst-triggered signal averaging technique to examine the changes in MAP, cardiac output, and total vascular conductance for 15 cardiac cycles after each MSNA burst or non-burst. A stepwise increase in the peak MAP (i.e., sympathetic transduction) was observed throughout all quartiles of normalized MSNA burst area (quartile 1 (Q1): 1.7 ± 1.3 mm Hg; Q2: 2.1 ± 1.3 mm Hg; Q3: 2.6 ± 1.4 mm Hg; Q4: 3.5 ± 1.4 mm Hg; P < 0.01). The largest quartile of normalized MSNA burst area demonstrated faster time-to-peak MAP responses (5.7 ± 2.5 s) than both Q1 (10.1 ± 3.9 s, P < 0.01) and Q2 (9.3 ± 4.1 s, P < 0.01), as well as, faster time-to-peak cardiac output and time-to-nadir total vascular conductance compared with Q1 and Q2 (All P < 0.05). Larger clusters of sympathetic bursts (i.e., triplets and ≥ quadruplets) did not have increased time-to-peak transduction compared with singlets and doublet bursts across all MSNA quartiles. These results highlight intraindividual variability in the time-course of sympathetic transduction and reveal an intrinsic property of larger sympathetic bursts to increase time-to-peak sympathetic transduction in humans. Novelty: Muscle sympathetic burst size can modulate time-to-peak sympathetic transduction in young healthy men and women. These observations appear independent of the pattern of sympathetic firing.

Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 Inhibition Increases Postprandial Norepinephrine via Substance P (NK1 Receptor) During RAAS Inhibition

CONTEXT

Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4) inhibitors may increase the risk of heart failure. Decreased degradation of vasoactive peptides like substance P [also degraded by angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE)] and Y1 agonists peptide YY (PYY 1-36) and neuropeptide Y (NPY 1-36) could contribute.

OBJECTIVE

This study tested the hypothesis that there is an interactive effect of DPP4 inhibition and ACE inhibition (vs antihypertensive control subjects) on vasoactive peptides after a mixed meal.

PARTICIPANTS AND DESIGN

Fifty-three patients with type 2 diabetes and hypertension were randomized to double-blind treatment with ramipril, valsartan, or amlodipine for 15 weeks in parallel groups. During the 5th, 10th, and 15th weeks, participants also received placebo + placebo, sitagliptin 100 mg/d + placebo, and sitagliptin + aprepitant 80 mg/d in random order. On the last day of each crossover treatment, participants underwent a mixed-meal study.

RESULTS

Sitagliptin increased postprandial glucagon-like peptide-1 and decreased glucose in all antihypertensive groups. Sitagliptin increased NPY 1-36 and decreased Y2 agonists NPY 3-36 and PYY 3-36 in all groups. During ramipril or valsartan, but not amlodipine, sitagliptin increased postprandial norepinephrine; substance P receptor blockade with aprepitant prevented this effect. Despite increased norepinephrine, sitagliptin decreased postprandial blood pressure during ACE inhibition.

CONCLUSION

DPP4 inhibition increases postprandial concentrations of the Y1 agonist NPY 1-36. During treatment with an ACE inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker, DPP4 inhibition increased postprandial norepinephrine through a substance P receptor-dependent mechanism. Increased NPY 1-36 and norepinephrine could increase risk of heart failure but did not result in higher postprandial blood pressure.

Targeting the Neuropeptide Y System in Stress-related Psychiatric Disorders

Repeated, extreme, or traumatic stressors can elicit pathological effects leading to many negative physical and psychological outcomes. Stressors can precipitate the onset of psychiatric diseases, or exacerbate pre-existing disorders including various anxiety and mood disorders. As stressors can negatively impact human psychiatric health, it is essential to identify neurochemicals that may confer protection from the negative sequelae of repeated or extreme stress exposure. Elucidating the neurobiological underpinnings of stress resilience will enhance our ability to promote resilience to, or recovery from, stress-related psychiatric disease. Herein, we will review the evidence for neuropeptide Y as an endogenous mediator of resilience and its potential relevance for the treatment of stress-related psychiatric diseases.

•

Overview of neuropeptide Y and receptor subtypes in the central nervous system.

•

Alterations of neuropeptide Y in human stress-related psychiatric disorders.

•

Evidence for neuropeptide Y in resilience to stress-related emotionality in rodent behavioral models.

•

Pharmacotherapeutic implications for neuropeptide Y in the treatment of stress-related psychiatric disorders.

Neuropeptide Y1receptor vasoconstriction in exercising canine skeletal muscles

Existing evidence suggests that neuropeptide Y (NPY) acts as a neurotransmitter in vascular smooth muscle and is coreleased with norepinephrine from sympathetic nerves. We hypothesized that release of NPY stimulates NPY Y(1) receptors in the skeletal muscle vasculature to produce vasoconstriction during dynamic exercise. Eleven mongrel dogs were instrumented chronically with flow probes on the external iliac arteries of both hindlimbs and a catheter in one femoral artery. In resting dogs (n = 4), a 2.5-mg bolus of BIBP-3226 (NPY Y(1) antagonist) infused into the femoral artery increased external iliac conductance by 150 +/- 82% (1.80 +/- 0.44 to 3.50 +/- 0.14 ml.min(-1).mmHg(-1); P < 0.05). A 10-mg bolus of BIBP-3226 infused into the femoral artery in dogs (n = 7) exercising on a treadmill at a moderate intensity (6 miles/h) increased external iliac conductance by 28 +/- 6% (6.00 +/- 0.49 to 7.64 +/- 0.61 ml.min(-1).mmHg(-1); P < 0.05), whereas the solvent vehicle did not (5.74 +/- 0.51 to 5.98 +/- 0.43 ml.min(-1).mmHg(-1); P > 0.05). During exercise, BIBP-3226 abolished the reduction in conductance produced by infusions of the NPY Y(1) agonist [Leu(31),Pro(34)]NPY (-19 +/- 3 vs. 0.5 +/- 1%). Infusions of BIBP-3226 (n = 7) after alpha-adrenergic receptor antagonism with prazosin and rauwolscine also increased external iliac conductance (6.82 +/- 0.43 to 8.22 +/- 0.48 ml.min(-1).mmHg(-1); P < 0.05). These data support the hypothesis that NPY Y(1) receptors produce vasoconstriction in exercising skeletal muscle. Furthermore, the NPY Y(1) receptor-mediated tone appears to be independent of alpha-adrenergic receptor-mediated vasoconstriction.

Y1- and alpha1-receptor control of basal hindlimb vascular tone

The role of endogenous Y(1)-receptor activation on skeletal muscle vasculature under baseline conditions is currently debated and no in vivo studies have been performed to address this issue. Therefore, this study was designed to address the effect of Y(1)-receptor and/or alpha(1)-adrenoceptor antagonism on basal hindlimb vascular conductance in male Sprague-Dawley rats in vivo. Left hindlimb vascular conductance, carotid artery mean arterial pressure, and heart rate were measured during low volume infusion of N(2)-(diphenylacetyl)-N-[(4-hydroxyphenyl)methyl]-d-arginine amide (BIBP3226; 100 microg/kg), prazosin (20 microg/kg), and combined blockade to the left hindlimb. Vascular conductance increased 1.5 +/- 0.5 microl.min(-1).mmHg(-1) with BIBP3226 infusion, 1.7 +/- 0.5 microl.min(-1).mmHg(-1) with prazosin infusion, and 4.8 +/- 1.0 microl.min(-1).mmHg(-1) with combined blockade (P < 0.05). Interestingly, systolic vascular conductance increased in all three conditions, but diastolic vascular conductance only increased in the two conditions where BIBP3226 was present. These data indicate that Y(1)-receptor activation plays an important role in the regulation of vascular conductance in the resting rat hindlimb. Furthermore, this effect was of the same magnitude as the alpha(1)-adrenoceptor contribution. The differential flow profiles following alpha(1) blockade with and without Y(1)-receptor blockade supports local differences in receptor distribution.