Positive end-expiratory pressure shifts left ventricular diastolic pressure-area curves

The effects of positive end-expiratory pressure on cardiac function: a comparative echocardiography-conductance catheter study

Background

Echocardiographic parameters of diastolic function depend on cardiac loading conditions, which are altered by positive pressure ventilation. The direct effects of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) on cardiac diastolic function are unknown.

Methods

Twenty-five patients without apparent diastolic dysfunction undergoing coronary angiography were ventilated noninvasively at PEEPs of 0, 5, and 10 cmH₂O (in randomized order). Echocardiographic diastolic assessment and pressure–volume-loop analysis from conductance catheters were compared. The time constant for pressure decay (τ) was modeled with exponential decay. End-diastolic and end-systolic pressure volume relationships (EDPVRs and ESPVRs, respectively) from temporary caval occlusion were analyzed with generalized linear mixed-effects and linear mixed models. Transmural pressures were calculated using esophageal balloons.

Results

τ values for intracavitary cardiac pressure increased with the PEEP (n = 25; no PEEP, 44 ± 5 ms; 5 cmH₂O PEEP, 46 ± 6 ms; 10 cmH₂O PEEP, 45 ± 6 ms; p < 0.001). This increase disappeared when corrected for transmural pressure and diastole length. The transmural EDPVR was unaffected by PEEP. The ESPVR increased slightly with PEEP. Echocardiographic mitral inflow parameters and tissue Doppler values decreased with PEEP [peak E wave (n = 25): no PEEP, 0.76 ± 0.13 m/s; 5 cmH₂O PEEP, 0.74 ± 0.14 m/s; 10 cmH₂O PEEP, 0.68 ± 0.13 m/s; p = 0.016; peak A wave (n = 24): no PEEP, 0.74 ± 0.12 m/s; 5 cmH₂O PEEP, 0.7 ± 0.11 m/s; 10 cmH₂O PEEP, 0.67 ± 0.15 m/s; p = 0.014; E’ septal (n = 24): no PEEP, 0.085 ± 0.016 m/s; 5 cmH₂O PEEP, 0.08 ± 0.013 m/s; 10 cmH₂O PEEP, 0.075 ± 0.012 m/s; p = 0.002].

Conclusions

PEEP does not affect active diastolic relaxation or passive ventricular filling properties. Dynamic echocardiographic filling parameters may reflect changing loading conditions rather than intrinsic diastolic function. PEEP may have slight positive inotropic effects.

Clinical trial registration

https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02267291, registered 17. October 2014.

Graphical abstract

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00392-022-02014-1.

High-frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional ventilation: hemodynamic effects on lung and heart

Abstract High-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) may improve gas exchange in patients who are inadequately ventilated by conventional mechanical ventilation (CV); however, the hemodynamic consequences of switching to HFOV remain unclear. We compared the effects of CV and HFOV on pulmonary vascular conductance and left ventricular (LV) preload and performance at different airway and filling pressures. In anesthetized dogs, we measured LV dimensions, aortic and pulmonary artery (PA) flow, and mean airway ( AW) and pericardial pressures. Catheter-tip pressure manometers measured aortic, LV, left atrial, and PA pressures. The pericardium and chest were closed. At LV end-diastolic pressure (PLVED) = 5 mmHg and 12 mmHg, PEEP was varied (6 cm H2O, 12 cm H2O, and 18 cm H2O) during CV. Then, at airway pressures equal to those during CV, HFOV was applied at 4 Hz, 10 Hz, and 15 Hz. Increased AW decreased pulmonary vascular conductance. As cardiac output increased, conductance increased. At PLVED = 12 mmHg, conductance was greatest during HFOV at 4 Hz. LV preload (i.e., ALV, our index of end-diastolic volume) was similar during HFOV and CV for all conditions. At PLVED = 12 mmHg, SWLV was similar during CV and HFOV, but, at PLVED = 5 mmHg and AW 10 cm H2O, SWLV was lower during HFOV than CV. Compared to pulmonary vascular conductance at higher frequencies, at PLVED = 12 mmHg, conductance was greater at HFOV of 4 Hz. Effects of CV and HFOV on LV preload and performance were similar except for decreased SWLV at PLVED = 5 mmHg. These observations suggest the need for further studies to assess their potential clinical relevance.

Positive end-expiratory pressure aggravates left ventricular diastolic relaxation further in patients with pre-existing relaxation abnormality

BACKGROUND

Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) has been known to adversely influence cardiac output. Even though left ventricular (LV) diastolic function significantly contributes to LV performance, the effects of PEEP on LV diastolic function remains controversial. We, therefore, aimed to examine the effects of PEEP on LV diastolic function by use of pulsed wave Doppler tissue imaging in patients with pre-existing LV relaxation abnormality.

METHODS

Seventeen patients with peak early diastolic velocity of lateral mitral annulus (E') <8.5 cm s(-1) among patients who underwent coronary artery bypass graft surgery were evaluated. Echocardiographic and haemodynamic variables were measured with 0, 5, and 10 cmH2O of PEEP. E' and deceleration time (DT) of peak early transmitral filling velocity (E) were used as echocardiographic indicators of LV diastolic function.

RESULTS

Mean arterial blood pressure decreased during 10 cmH2O PEEP, compared with that during 0 cmH2O PEEP. E' showed a gradual and significant decrease with an incremental increase in PEEP (6.9 ± 0.9, 5.8 ± 0.9, and 5.2 ± 1.2 cm s(-1) during 0, 5, and 10 cmH2O PEEP, respectively), and DT of E was prolonged during 10 cmH2O PEEP, compared with that during 0 cmH2O PEEP.

CONCLUSIONS

Increasing PEEP led to a progressive decline in LV relaxation in patients with pre-existing LV relaxation abnormality.

Clinical review: Positive end-expiratory pressure and cardiac output

In patients with acute lung injury, high levels of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) may be necessary to maintain or restore oxygenation, despite the fact that 'aggressive' mechanical ventilation can markedly affect cardiac function in a complex and often unpredictable fashion. As heart rate usually does not change with PEEP, the entire fall in cardiac output is a consequence of a reduction in left ventricular stroke volume (SV). PEEP-induced changes in cardiac output are analyzed, therefore, in terms of changes in SV and its determinants (preload, afterload, contractility and ventricular compliance). Mechanical ventilation with PEEP, like any other active or passive ventilatory maneuver, primarily affects cardiac function by changing lung volume and intrathoracic pressure. In order to describe the direct cardiocirculatory consequences of respiratory failure necessitating mechanical ventilation and PEEP, this review will focus on the effects of changes in lung volume, factors controlling venous return, the diastolic interactions between the ventricles and the effects of intrathoracic pressure on cardiac function, specifically left ventricular function. Finally, the hemodynamic consequences of PEEP in patients with heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and acute respiratory distress syndrome are discussed.

RV filling modulates LV function by direct ventricular interaction during mechanical ventilation

During mechanical ventilation, phasic changes in systemic venous return modulate right ventricular output but may also affect left ventricular function by direct ventricular interaction. In 13 anesthetized, closed-chest, normal dogs, we measured inferior vena cava flow and left and right ventricular dimensions and output during mechanical ventilation, during an inspiratory hold, and (during apnea) vena caval constriction and abdominal compression. During a single ventilation cycle preceded by apnea, positive pressure inspiration decreased caval flow and right ventricular dimension; the transseptal pressure gradient increased, the septum shifted rightward, reflecting an increased left ventricular volume (the anteroposterior diameter did not change); and stroke volume increased. The opposite occurred during expiration. Similarly, the maneuvers that decreased venous return shifted the septum rightward, and left ventricular volume and stroke volume increased. Increased venous return had opposite effects. Changes in left ventricular function caused by changes in venous return alone were similar to those during mechanical ventilation except for minor quantitative differences. We conclude that phasic changes in systemic venous return during mechanical ventilation modulate left ventricular function by direct ventricular interaction.

Dynamic effects of positive-pressure ventilation on canine left ventricular pressure-volume relations

Positive-pressure ventilation (PPV) may affect left ventricular (LV) performance by altering both LV diastolic compliance and pericardial pressure (Ppc). We measured the effect of PPV on LV intraluminal pressure, Ppc, LV volume, and LV cross-sectional area in 17 acute anesthetized dogs. To account for changes in lung volume independent of changes in Ppc and differences in contractility, measures were made during both open- and closed-chest conditions, during closed chest with and without chest wall binding, and after propranolol-induced acute ventricular failure (AVF). Apneic end-systolic pressure-volume relations (ESPVR) were generated by inferior vena caval occlusions. With the open chest, PPV had no effects. With the chest closed, PPV inspiration decreased LV end-diastolic volume (EDV) along its diastolic compliance curve and decreased end-systolic volume (ESV) such that the end-systolic pressure-volume domain was shifted to a point left of the LV ESPVR, even when referenced to Ppc. The decrease in EDV was greater in control than in AVF conditions, whereas the shift of the ESV to the left of the ESPVR was greater with AVF than in control conditions. We conclude that the hemodynamic effects of PPV inspiration are due primarily to changes in intrathoracic pressure and that the inspiration-induced decreases of LV EDV reflect direct effects of intrathoracic pressure on LV filling. The decreases in LV ESV exceed the amount explained solely by a reduction in LV ejection pressure.

Effect of positive end-expiratory pressure on left and right ventricular diastolic filling assessed by transoesophageal Doppler echocardiography

The effect of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) on left and right ventricular diastolic filling dynamics was assessed by transmitral and transtricuspid flow patterns. Using transoesophageal Doppler echocardiography in fourteen ASA physical status 1 female patients, the following measurements were performed at baseline (0 cm H2O PEEP) and at 5, 10, 15, and 20 cm H2O PEEP: 1. peak velocity of early filling (peak E velocity), 2. peak velocity of atrial contraction (peak A velocity), 3. the ratio of the peak E to A velocity (peak E/A velocity ratio), 4. isovolumic relaxation time (IRT), 5. acceleration half-time (AHT), 6. deceleration half-time (DHT) of early filling, and 7. end-diastolic and end-systolic areas of both ventricles. Increasing PEEP progressively deceased peak E velocity of both ventricles. In contrast, peak A velocity did not change and the peak E/A velocity ratio decreased significantly with PEEP. IRT and AHTs remained unchanged, but DHTs of both ventricles increased following PEEP. End-diastolic and end-systolic areas of both ventricles decreased gradually and significantly with PEEP. It is concluded that PEEP was associated with decreased preload as well as reduced compliance of both ventricles, which was considered to contribute to the changes in diastolic ventricular filling.

Efficacy of nasal continuous positive airway pressure therapy in chronic heart failure: importance of underlying cardiac rhythm

BACKGROUND

Some previous reports have indicated beneficial cardiac effects of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) in patients with severe congestive heart failure (CHF), but others have reported deleterious cardiac effects, particularly among patients in atrial fibrillation (AF). The aim of this study was to determine if differences in cardiac rhythm influence the acute cardiac response to NCPAP.

METHODS

Eleven consecutive patients with CHF were recruited, six in atrial fibrillation (AF) and five with sinus rhythm (SR). Cardiac index was measured during awake NCPAP application by the thermodilution technique during cardiac catheterisation. NCPAP was applied in a randomised sequence at pressures of 0, 5, and 10 cm H2O with three 30 minute applications separated by 20 minute recovery periods without NCPAP.

RESULTS

Significant differences were found between the AF and SR groups for cardiac index responses to NCPAP (p = 0.004, ANOVA) with a fall in cardiac index in the AF group (p = 0.02) and a trend towards an increase in the SR group (p = 0.10). Similar differences were seen between the groups in stroke volume index responses but not in heart rate responses. Changes in systemic vascular resistance were also significantly different between the two groups (p < 0.005, ANOVA), rising in the AF group but falling in the SR group.

CONCLUSIONS

These data indicate an important effect of underlying cardiac rhythm on the awake haemodynamic effects of NCPAP in patients with CHF.

Ventilation by external high-frequency oscillations improves cardiac function after coronary artery bypass grafting

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effects of ventilation with intermittent positive pressure and external high frequency oscillation by the Hayek Oscillator during the first 5 h after coronary artery bypass grafting.

METHODS

Eleven patients were randomized to intermittent positive pressure ventilation throughout the observation period (5 h), while 13 patients were initially ventilated with intermittent positive pressure ventilation, then by external high-frequency oscillations for 4 h, changing to positive pressure ventilation for the last hour.

RESULTS

Cardiac index, stroke volume index, right ventricular stroke work index, right ventricular end-diastolic volume index and mixed venous oxygen saturation were significantly increased during ventilation with external high-frequency oscillations, and arteriovenous oxygen content difference was significantly reduced. There were no significant inter- or intragroup differences in fluid accumulation, mean arterial blood pressure, arterial blood gases, pulmonary artery pressure, central venous pressure, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, heart rate, systemic vascular resistance index, pulmonary vascular resistance index, intrapulmonary shunt fraction, right ventricular ejection fraction, right ventricular end-systolic volume index and left ventricular stroke work index.

CONCLUSIONS

Ventilation by external high-frequency oscillations increases cardiac index and improves tissue perfusion. The increased pumping of the heart is probably caused by changes of the intracardiac pressure-volume relationship. The Hayek Oscillator may have distinct cardiovascular benefits as ventilatory assistance in postoperative cardiac surgical patients.

The effects of positive end-expiratory pressure of intrapulmonary shunt and ventilatory deadspace in nonhypoxic trauma patients

Controversy exists regarding the routine use of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in mechanically ventilated patients. We hypothesized that nonhypoxic patients receiving 5-cm H2O PEEP would have improved shunt and PaO2/F10(2) ratios (P/F), without an increased dead space to tidal volume ratio (VD/VT) versus patients receiving no PEEP. Forty-four trauma patients were randomized to receive 5-cm H2O PEEP (PEEP) or 0-cm H2O PEEP (ZEEP). Shunt VD/VT and P/F were measured at 0, 12, 24, 36, and 48 hours after intubation and after extubation. PEEP and ZEEP comparisons used Student's t test and the General Linear Models procedure. Shunt was significantly increased at t = 0 and at extubation in the PEEP group. At extubation, the PEEP group demonstrated significantly higher VD/VT and poorer P/F ratios. After correction for baseline values, no statistically significant differences were noted in spite of a trend toward worsening pulmonary function in all measured parameters. These results suggest that routine use of 5-cm H2O PEEP in mechanical ventilated trauma patients is not necessary.

Effect of jet ventilation on heart failure: decreased afterload but negative response in left ventricular end-systolic pressure-volume function

OBJECTIVE

To examine the mechanism of cardiac assist with systolic jet ventilation, specifically effects on loading conditions and left ventricular pressure-volume function. Both systolic and diastolic jet ventilation were compared in the absence and presence of heart failure.

DESIGN

Prospective, two-factor, repeated-measures study.

SETTING

Animal laboratory.

SUBJECTS

Ten anesthetized, closed-chest dogs.

INTERVENTIONS

The measurement protocol consisted of two phases: a) apnea, randomized jet ventilation (systole- and diastole-synchronized); b) postjet ventilation apnea, before and after heart failure, induced with a propranolol-imipramine-plasma expansion treatment.

MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS

Systolic and diastolic jet ventilation was associated with mean airway pressures of approximately 7 mm Hg and intrapleural pressures of approximately 3 mm Hg in both heart conditions. In normal hearts, jet ventilation (either mode) decreased transmural left ventricular end-diastolic pressure by 40% to 60% (p < .05), left ventricular end-diastolic volume 25 +/- 8%, and stroke volume by 28% to 30%. Heart failure was associated with decreases (41 +/- 6%) in end-systolic pressure-volume function (i.e., pressure change/volume change or elastance), transmural left ventricular end-systolic pressure (22 +/- 3%), and stroke volume (16 +/- 4%), and increased transmural left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (139 +/- 6%). Application of jet ventilation (either mode) during heart failure did not affect stroke volume but significantly (p < .05) attenuated transmural left ventricular end-diastolic pressure by 30% to 40%, left ventricular end-diastolic volumes by 33 +/- 9%, and transmural left ventricular end-systolic pressure by 11% to 19% (p < .05). After jet ventilation, left ventricular elastance was decreased 36 +/- 8% in normal hearts and 35 +/- 11% in failing hearts. Stroke volume, however, returned to baseline levels because of increases in transmural left ventricular end-diastolic pressure in both heart conditions, and also in failing hearts, because transmural left ventricular end-systolic pressure remained decreased approximately 30% (p < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Jet ventilation did not decrease stroke volume in failing hearts because of the afterload-reducing benefit (decreased transmural left ventricular end-systolic pressure) of increased intrapleural pressure in dilated ventricles. Moreover, jet ventilation did not have positive effects on myocardial function and had negative effects on left ventricular elastance in the postjet ventilation period in both normal and failing hearts. Cardiac assist by jet ventilation was not cycle specific, suggesting no selective benefit of jet ventilation over conventional positive-pressure ventilation during heart failure. These studies demonstrate a negative inotropy associated with jet ventilation that, during heart failure, may compromise the general benefit of positive-pressure-mediated increases in intrapleural pressure.

Effects of (nCPAP) on cardiac function awake and asleep

Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) leads to a fall in cardiac output (CO) when applied to individuals with normal cardiac function. However, some reports indicate that CPAP improves CO in selected patients with congestive heart failure, although other reports disagree. Nasal CPAP effectively reverses obstructive sleep apnoea, a condition in which vigorous inspiratory efforts against an occluded upper airway can induce falls in CO. The cardiovascular effects of CPAP in such patients will depend on the balance between the indirect cardiac benefits resulting from relief of apnoeas, and the direct effects of positive pressure on the heart itself.

The effect of peep-ventilation on cardiac function in closed chest pigs

OBJECTIVE

Does ventilation with positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) depress myocardial contractility?

DESIGN

Ten piglets were anaesthetized and prepared for the measurement of cardiac output (SV) and right (MRAPtm) and left (MLAPtm) mean transmural atrial pressure, the latter serving as indices of preload. 500 ml of autologous blood was re-transfused during intermittent positive pressure ventilation without PEEP (IPPV) and continuous positive pressure ventilation with 15 cm H2O PEEP (CPPV).

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

Right and left ventricular function curves were drawn by plotting MRAPtm and MLAPtm respectively versus the corresponding strokevolumes before and after re-transfusion. Similar inclinations were obtained during IPPV and CPPV on either side of the heart.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the ventricular function curves during IPPV and CPPV covered partially different preload levels, the results suggest that CPPV i.e. PEEP does not affect myocardial contractility.

Left ventricular diastolic function during positive end-expiratory pressure. Impact of right ventricular ischemia and ventricular interaction

The individual and additive effects of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and right coronary artery (RCA) occlusion on left ventricular end-diastolic pressure-volume relations (LVEDPVR) were examined in six anesthetized dogs. Right ventricular (RV) and left ventricular (LV) ejection fractions (EF), end-diastolic volume (EDV) and end-systolic volumes (ESV) were measured by thermodilution as PEEP was added before and after RCA occlusion. PEEP alone caused a decline in cardiac output, transmural left atrial pressure (LAP) (6.0 +/- 0.6 to 3.2 +/- 1.4 mm Hg, p less than 0.05), and LVEDV (49 +/- 3 to 36 +/- 4 ml, p less than 0.05). RVEDV, the mean slope (+/- SD) of the LVEDPVR (0.37 +/- 0.16 to 0.30 +/- 0.19) and LAP at a common LV volume (35 ml, V35) did not change with PEEP. RCA occlusion caused cardiac output and RVEF (38 +/- 5 to 27 +/- 5%, p less than 0.05) to decline and RVESV (25 +/- 4 to 33 +/- 6 ml, p less than 0.05) to increase. RVEDV, the slope of the LVEDPVR, and LAP at V35 were unchanged from baseline. The addition of PEEP after RCA occlusion caused cardiac output to decline further. However, unlike before occlusion, there was no change in LAP (6.5 +/- 1.3 to 5.0 +/- 1.4 mm Hg) despite a decline in LVEDV (47 +/- 3 to 29 +/- 6 ml, p less than 0.05). RVESV and RVEDV increased with PEEP after RCA occlusion as did LAP at V35. The slope of the mean LVEDPVR tended to increase (0.98 +/- 1.03).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Endocrine responses to positive end-expiratory pressure ventilation in patients who have recently undergone heart surgery

The effect of positive end-expiratory pressure ventilation (PEEP) on angiotensin II and atrial natriuretic factor (ANF) was studied postoperatively following heart surgery. In nine patients pressures were recorded in the radial artery, pulmonary artery and the right atrium. PEEP of 5 cmH2O (0.5 kPa) and 10 cmH2O (1 kPa) increased angiotensin II from 38.8 +/- 20.3 (mean +/- s.e.mean) to 56.7 +/- 29.6 (n.s.) and 66.7 +/- 28.7 (P less than 0.05) pmol/l, respectively. Plasma-ANF showed no significant changes during PEEP. Pulmonary artery wedge pressure increased from 12.9 +/- 2.0 to 14.1 +/- 2.0 (n.s.) and 18.5 +/- 2.1 (P less than 0.01) mmHg, and right atrial pressure from 8.3 +/- 1.7 to 9.8 +/- 1.7 (n.s.) and 12.9 +/- 1.7 (P less than 0.01) mmHg with 5 and 10 cmH2O (0.5 and 1.0 kPa) of PEEP, respectively. Systemic blood pressure tended to decrease (n.s.) with PEEP. In conclusion, PEEP markedly increased angiotensin II. This may represent an important compensatory mechanism, helping to prevent reduction in aortic pressure during PEEP. ANF, however, did not change with PEEP of 5 or 10 cmH2O (0.5 and 1.0 kPa).

Hemodynamic effects of continuous negative chest pressure ventilation in heart failure

We have previously shown improved cardiac output (QT) with external continuous negative-pressure ventilation (CNPV) compared with continuous positive-pressure ventilation (CPPV) in dogs with low pressure pulmonary edema (1). The current study was done to determine if this effect was reversed in high pressure pulmonary edema. Seven supine, anesthetized dogs were fluid-loaded and treated with disopyramide (3.5 to 7.0 mg/kg) and propranolol (0.25 to 1.5 mg/kg). This produced a mean pulmonary wedge pressure (Ppaw) of 21.0 mm Hg on intermittent positive-pressure ventilation (IPPV). CPPV and CNPV were then alternated at 30-min intervals. Ventilators were matched for oxygen concentration, frequency, tidal volume (VT), and the increment in FRC (delta FRC) produced by a given positive (PEEP) or negative (NEEP) end-expiratory pressure. During 20 cm H2O of PEEP, QT values were significantly depressed from IPPV control values (2.13 +/- 0.2 versus 1.27 +/- 0.2 L/min, p less than 0.05) but not during CNPV with equivalent NEEP (1.66 +/- 0.2 L/min). Although arterial oxygen saturations were similar, mixed venous oxygen saturations were depressed by CPPV with PEEP of 15 and 20 cm H2O (67.9 +/- 3.8% during IPPV versus 54.1 +/- 4.9 and 51.9 +/- 5.8%, respectively, p less than 0.05 in both instances) but not during equivalent CNPV (59.9 +/- 4.3 and 58.7 +/- 4.5%). Despite potentially increased left ventricular afterload, external negative chest wall ventilation with NEEP does not appear to significantly depress QT compared with CPPV even when Ppaw is high and myocardial contractility is impaired.

Differing responses in right and left ventricular filling, loading and volumes during positive end-expiratory pressure

Using a combined hemodynamic and radionuclide technique, 20 patients with varied ventricular function were evaluated during positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) application. Left ventricular (LV) and right ventricular (RV) ejection fractions and cardiac output were measured, and ventricular volumes were derived. Seven patients (group 1) who had an increase in LV end-diastolic volume with PEEP and 13 patients (group 2) who had the more typical response, a decrease in LV end-diastolic volume with PEEP, were identified. Compared with group 2, group 1 patients had a higher incidence of coronary artery disease (5 of 7 vs 1 of 13, p less than 0.005) and lower cardiac output (3.9 +/- 1.6 vs 9.1 +/- 3.2 liters/min, p less than 0.005), LV ejection fraction (27 +/- 13 vs 51 +/- 21%, p less than 0.05), RV ejection fraction (15 +/- 6 vs 32 +/- 8%, p less than 0.005) and peak filling rate (1.32 +/- 0.43 vs 3.51 +/- 1.70 end-diastolic volumes/s, p less than 0.05). LV and RV volumes increased and peak filling rate decreased with PEEP in group 1, whereas in group 2 LV volume decreased and RV volume and peak filling rate remained unchanged. Using stepwise regression analysis, the change in LV volume with PEEP was related directly to baseline systemic vascular resistance and inversely to baseline blood pressure. Similarly, the change in peak filling rate with PEEP was inversely related to the change in RV end-diastolic volume. Thus, the hemodynamic response to PEEP is heterogeneous and may be related to LV ischemia.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Effect of airway pressure on pericardial pressure

The effect of applied positive airway pressure or PEEP on pericardial pressure was examined in closed-chest, anesthetized dogs with normal lungs and in animals with oleic acid-induced lung injury. Both groups were studied before and after vascular volume loading by dextran infusion. Pericardial pressure was measured using an air-filled flat balloon placed along the lateral left ventricular free wall within the pericardial space. A linear relation between right atrial pressure (RAP) and pericardial pressure (PP) was found (RAP = 3.9 + 0.78 PP, r = 0.76, p less than 0.01) that was independent of acute lung injury but was influenced by the application of PEEP. In the baseline volume condition, pericardial pressure increased linearly with an increase in PEEP to 15 cm H2O. After volume loading, pericardial pressure increased fourfold, but, surprisingly, did not change with applied PEEP. These relations were similar in the two groups despite a reduction in total respiratory system compliance in the oleic acid group. This suggests that transmission of airway pressure to the pericardial surface is independent of the presence of acute lung injury and that changes in pericardial pressure in response to PEEP reflect both the transmission of airway pressure to the pericardial surface and, presumably, PEEP-related changes in cardiac volume and ventricular compliance.

The effects of coronary artery disease on cardiac function in nonhypotensive sepsis

To assess the effects of coronary artery disease on cardiac function in the presence of sepsis, we compared several hemodynamic indices in two groups of septic patients. Group 1 (n = 69) consisted of patients with nonhypotensive sepsis without coronary artery disease. Group 2 (n = 25) comprised septic patients who had clinical evidence of coronary artery disease. All patients were hemodynamically stable and normotensive at the time of the study. None required inotropic support. While the two groups had similar mean heart rates, mean blood pressures, and biventricular filling pressures, the mean cardiac index was significantly lower in group 2 (3.5 +/- 0.9 L/min/m2 vs 4.4 +/- 1.2; p less than 0.05). This lower cardiac index was related to significantly lower end-diastolic volume indices in group #2, not to differences in contractility between groups. Since the ventricular filling pressures of the groups were similar, the differences in end-diastolic volumes indicate differences in the biventricular compliance. In the presence of hyperdynamic, nonhypotensive sepsis, coronary artery disease was associated with a clinically significant impairment of biventricular compliance, which resulted in a reduction in cardiac output and systemic oxygen transport.

The right ventricle and critical illness: a review of anatomy, physiology, and clinical evaluation of its function

This paper reviews right ventricular anatomy and physiology in the critically ill patient. The role of right ventricular function during acute pulmonary artery hypertension and the effect of acute myocardial injury upon right ventricular performance are examined. Clinical methods of assessing right ventricular function at the bedside in acutely ill patients are critically reviewed.

Hemodynamic effects of external continuous negative pressure ventilation compared with those of continuous positive pressure ventilation in dogs with acute lung injury

Patients with noncardiogenic pulmonary edema requiring ventilatory assistance are usually supported with CPPV using positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), but CPPV requires endotracheal intubation and may decrease cardiac output (QT). The purpose of this study was to examine thoracoabdominal continuous negative pressure ventilation (CNPV) using external negative end-expiratory pressure (NEEP). The effects on gas exchange and hemodynamics were compared with those of CPPV with PEEP, with the premise that CNPV might sustain venous return and improve QT. In 6 supine, anesthetized and paralyzed dogs with oleic-acid-induced pulmonary edema, 30 min of CNPV was alternated twice with 30 min of CPPV. Positive and negative pressure ventilation were carefully matched for fractional inspired oxygen concentration (FIO2 = 0.56), breathing frequency, and tidal volume. In addition, we matched the increase in delta FRC obtained with the constant distending pressures produced by both modes of ventilation. An average of -9 cm H2O of NEEP produced the same delta FRC as 10.8 cm H2O of PEEP. Gas exchange did not differ significantly between the 2 modes. However, QT was 15.8% higher during CNPV than during CPPV (p less than 0.02). Mixed venous oxygen saturation also improved during CNPV compared with that during CPPV (58.3 versus 54.5%, p less than 0.01). Negative pressure ventilation using NEEP may be a viable alternative to positive pressure ventilation with PEEP in the management of critically ill patients with noncardiogenic pulmonary edema. It offers comparable improvement in gas exchange with the advantages of less cardiac depression and the possible avoidance of endotracheal intubation.

Left ventricular external constraint: relationship between pericardial, pleural and esophageal pressures during positive end-expiratory pressure and volume loading in dogs

Left ventricular (LV) diastolic filling is limited by the constraining effects exerted by the pericardium (PE) and the lung/chest wall. The aim of the present study was to assess the validity of various estimates of external cardiac constraint, compared to pericardial surface pressure (Ppe) measured lateral to the LV myocardium. In nine anesthetized dogs we measured Ppe, pleural surface pressure (Ppt) (lateral to the pericardium) and esophageal pressure (Pes) under conditions of volume loading and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). We measured Ppe and Ppl with flat, liquid-containing silastic rubber balloons and Pes with an air-containing cylindrical balloon. After instrumentation, the chest was resealed and continuous suction (-5 mm Hg, 1 mm Hg = 0.133 kPa) was maintained. Volume loading with incremental intravenous infusions of saline was used to increase LV end-diastolic pressure to 20-25 mm Hg. PEEP of 0, 10 and 20 mm Hg were applied at baseline and after each increment of volume loading. At low volume, increases in PEEP caused simultaneous increases in LV end-diastolic pressure (P less than 0.01) and in Ppe (P less than 0.0001) but a reduction in transmural LV pressure (P less than 0.0005). Ppl and Pes both increased with PEEP (P less than 0.001 and P less than 0.01, respectively). However, Ppe always exceeded Ppl, while Pes remained at only approximately 1/3 Ppl throughout. Volume loading caused a significant increase in Ppe (P less than 0.0001) and a smaller, but significant increase in Ppl (P less than 0.05). Pes remained unchanged during volume loading. Thus external cardiac constraint increased markedly during volume loading and PEEP as evidenced by a marked elevation of Ppe. Both Ppl and Pes markedly underestimated this increase. Therefore, calculation of transmural LV pressure by subtracting pleural or esophageal pressure from intracavitary pressure can lead to overestimation of LV preload. The decrease in cardiac output during PEEP occurs secondary to decreased preload, i.e. decreased transmural pressure and end-diastolic dimension. Analysis of performance using cardiac function curves does not suggest a change in contractility with PEEP.

The influence of positive end-expiratory pressure on intrapericardial pressure and cardiac function after coronary artery bypass surgery

The hemodynamic effects of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) were studied in coronary artery bypass patients by recording intrapericardial and intracardiac pressures, measuring cardiac output by thermodilution, and determining left ventricular volumes by nuclear radiography. An elevation of PEEP to 5, 10, and 15 cm H2O led to a decrease in cardiac output (15% decrease at PEEP 15) as intrapericardial pressure increased and transmural left atrial pressure decreased. Modest volume loading (an increase in left atrial pressure of 3 mm Hg) greatly attenuated the deleterious effects of 15 cm H2O PEEP. There was an excellent correlation between pulmonary capillary wedge pressure and left atrial pressure at PEEP 0 and 5 (r = .85 and r = .83). This correlation was not nearly as reliable at PEEP 15 (r = .54). A predictable increase in intrapericardial pressure was observed as PEEP was applied in these patients. The magnitude of this increase can be estimated by multiplying the change in PEEP (in cm H2O) by 0.4 to estimate the change in intrapericardial pressure (in mm Hg). Using this estimation as a guide, modest volume loading can be used to maintain transmural filling pressures (and cardiac output) when PEEP is used after coronary artery bypass surgery.

Cardiopulmonary function of cats with respiratory distress induced by N-nitroso N-methylurethane

The purposes of this study were to determine the effects of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and end-expiratory lung volume on systemic blood flow, whether PEEP levels yielding maximum systemic oxygen transport are associated with maximum lung compliance, and the effects of end-expiratory lung volume on pulmonary resistance to gas flow, in an animal model of respiratory distress. Twelve cats were inoculated with 12 mg/kg N-Nitroso N-Methylurethane (NNNMU) to induce respiratory distress. The NNNMU caused a 76% decrease in disaturated phosphatidyl-choline of lung lavage, a 34% decrease in functional residual capacity (FRC), an 80% decrease in lung compliance, an 88% increase in pulmonary resistance to gas flow, a 43% decrease in PaO2, and a 37% decrease in oxygen consumption. Systemic blood flow and systemic oxygen transport were not significantly altered by the chemically induced respiratory distress. PEEP levels of 5.1 +/- 0.8 cm H2O returned end-expiratory lung volume to normal FRC levels. Increases in PEEP caused systemic blood flow to decrease even when end-expiratory lung volume was below or equal to normal FRC levels but did not significantly affect systemic oxygen transport, lung compliance, or pulmonary resistance. We conclude that in cats with NNNMU-induced respiratory distress: PEEP causes decreases in systemic blood flow, lung compliance and systemic oxygen transport are not clear indicators of optimal PEEP level, and returning end-expiratory lung volume to normal FRC does not significantly reduce pulmonary resistance to gas flow.

Hemodynamic effects of positive end-expiratory pressure. Historical perspective

Mechanical ventilation with positive end-expiratory pressure has been known to increase arterial oxygen content for approximately 40 years. Early experiments demonstrated a diminution of cardiac output with the application of positive end-expiratory pressure, and it was not favored as a therapeutic modality until the 1960s, when it was found to be effective in the treatment of adult respiratory distress syndrome. In recent years, physiologists have methodically scrutinized the effects of positive end-expiratory pressure on each of the major determinants of cardiac output. Review of the progression of thought on this subject reinforces for today's clinician basic principles of cardiac performance and heart-lung interaction.

Mechanisms of decreased left ventricular preload during continuous positive pressure ventilation in ARDS

Continuous positive pressure ventilation is associated with a reduction in left ventricular preload and cardiac output, but the mechanisms responsible are controversial. The decrease in left ventricular preload may result exclusively from a decreased systemic venous return due to increased pleural pressure, or from an additional effect such as decreased left ventricular compliance. To determine the mechanisms responsible, we studied the changes in cardiac output induced by continuous positive pressure ventilation in eight patients with the adult respiratory distress syndrome. We measured cardiac output by thermodilution, and biventricular ejection fraction by equilibrium gated blood pool scintigraphy. Biventricular end-diastolic volumes were then calculated by dividing stroke volume by ejection fraction. As positive end-expiratory pressure increased from 0 to 20 cm H2O, stroke volume and biventricular end-diastolic volumes fell about 25 percent, and biventricular ejection fraction remained unchanged. At 20 cm H2O positive end-expiratory pressure, volume expansion for normalizing cardiac output restored biventricular end-diastolic volumes without markedly changing biventricular end-diastolic transmural pressures. The primary cause of the reduction in left ventricular preload with continuous positive pressure ventilation appears to be a fall in venous return and hence in right ventricular stroke volume, without evidence of change in left ventricular diastolic compliance.

Extracorporeal CO2 Removal in severe adult respiratory distress syndrome

Sixty-five per cent survival has been achieved in a group of patients with severe ARDS and a predicted mortality of 92%, by the use of Gattinoni's technique of extracorporeal CO2 removal. In patients and animals the technique has usually resulted in rapid improvement in the radiographic appearance and lung function. There are several possible mechanisms by which the technique may facilitate lung repair, including improvement of lung tissue oxygenation, the avoidance of high airway pressures and regional alkalosis in the lung, a reduction in oxygen toxicity, and the frequency observed reduction in pulmonary artery pressure. The apparent effectiveness of the technique and other associated evidence have implications which should lead us to reconsider some aspects of our conventional management of patients with severe ARDS.

A potential method of correcting intracavitary left ventricular filling pressures for the effects of positive end-expiratory airway pressure

Based on the observation that positive end-expiratory airway pressure (PEEP) causes comparable increments in intrapericardial and right-sided intracardiac pressures, we hypothesized that intracavitary left ventricular filling pressures measured in the presence of PEEP can be corrected for increased intrathoracic pressure by subtracting the effects of PEEP on intracavitary right ventricular filling pressures. Ventricular function curves (aortic blood flow vs intracavitary left ventricular end-diastolic pressure [LVEDP]) were generated with and without 15 cm of water of PEEP in eight dogs. All curves were shifted to the right by PEEP (i.e., intracavitary LVEDP was higher for any submaximal level of aortic blood flow). However, when pressures measured in the presence of PEEP were "corrected" by subtracting the corresponding increment in intracavitary right ventricular end-diastolic pressure caused by PEEP at each level of ventricular filling, control and corrected PEEP data points appeared to fall on the same curve in five dogs, and differed only slightly in three dogs. Mean control and corrected PEEP curves derived by averaging polynomial regression coefficients for each condition differed significantly from uncorrected PEEP curves (p less than .05), but not from each other. Analogous curves based on mean left atrial pressure were corrected equally well by subtracting the effects of PEEP on mean right atrial pressure. We conclude that the increments in intracavitary right heart filling pressures caused by PEEP can be used to correct intracavitary left heart filling pressures for the effects of PEEP on intrathoracic pressure.

Role of parietal pericardium in acute, severe mitral regurgitation in dogs

Mitral regurgitation (MR) resulting from acute disruption of the mitral valve apparatus leads to serious hemodynamic sequelae. The lesion produces major elevation of left atrial (LA) and pulmonary artery pressures and decreases forward cardiac output. Clinical studies have shown hemodynamic patterns in acute MR similar to those seen in constrictive pericardial disease, suggesting that the pericardium serves to importantly limit cardiac filling in this condition. This hypothesis has not been tested in an animal model in which the intrapericardial pressure can be directly measured. In the present study intrapericardial and intracardiac pressures were measured in 8 dogs before and after the production of acute MR. After production of MR, mean LA pressure increased from 8 +/- 3 to 20 +/- 7 mm Hg (p = 0.004) and the peak LA V wave averaged 31 +/- 13 mm Hg. Mean right atrial pressure increased slightly, from 4 +/- 2 to 5 +/- 1 mm Hg (p less than 0.008). Intrapericardial pressure increased in each dog, but the increment was invariably small (1 +/- 2 to 3 +/- 2 mm Hg, p = 0.001) and there was no tendency to equalization of pressure between right- and left-sided cardiac chambers. Thus, the role of the pericardium in the immediate hemodynamic response to acute, severe MR is minor.

Volume-dependent effects of positive airway pressure on intracavitary left ventricular end-diastolic pressure

To test the hypothesis that the effects of positive end-expiratory airway pressure (PEEP) on intracavitary left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) depend on the ventricular filling conditions under which PEEP is applied, the effects of PEEP on pressure in and around the left ventricle were determined before and after stepwise expansion of intravascular blood volume in 10 closed-chest dogs. Over a range of 0 to 20 cm of water, PEEP progressively increased both intrapericardial and intracavitary right ventricular end-diastolic pressures. These increases in pressure around the left ventricle were approximately linear and were relatively unaffected by volume loading. At the same time, PEEP always decreased transmural LVEDP by decreasing ventricular filling. However, transmural LVEDP fell more when ventricular volume was initially large, due to the nonlinear relationship between left ventricular transmural pressure and volume. As a result, intracavitary LVEDP (which reflected the sum of decreased transmural LVEDP and increased external pressure) increased when baseline ventricular volume was small and decreased when baseline ventricular volume was large. At intermediate volumes the fall in transmural pressure equaled the rise in external pressure, and intracavitary LVEDP did not change. These findings demonstrate that changes due to PEEP in intracavitary LVEDP are a complex function of increased intrathoracic pressure, decreased ventricular filling, and the operative level of left ventricular compliance.

Effects of airway pressure and lung volume on left ventricular transmural pressure-volume relationships in humans

Positive airway pressure, combined with increased lung volume, decreases left ventricular compliance in dogs. To determine whether airway pressure or lung volume influences left ventricular diastolic properties in humans, we examined two consecutive cineangiograms with simultaneous esophageal and left ventricular pressure recordings in 14 patients. Both studies were performed during sustained inspiration, one with atmospheric airway pressure, and one with positive airway pressure (9.1 +/- 2.4 mm Hg). Positive pressure caused higher transpulmonary (airway minus esophageal) pressure and therefore greater lung volume in 10 of 14 patients, while four patients had lower transpulmonary pressures due to decreased inspiratory effort. When positive airway pressure and increased lung volume were present together (n = 10), left ventricular transmural (ventricular minus esophageal) pressure-volume curves revealed higher transmural pressures at comparable diastolic ventricular volumes. For example, at end-diastole mean left ventricular transmural pressure was 25.2 +/- 12.9 mm Hg (compared to 20.8 +/- 12.3 mm Hg during control studies, p less than 0.05), while ventricular volume was unchanged (189 +/- 87 compared to 185 +/- 81 ml, p = NS). When all 14 patients were considered together, this effect was linked more closely to higher transpulmonary pressure than to positive airway pressure. We conclude that human left ventricular transmural pressure-volume relationships are influenced by airway pressure and lung volume. Our findings further suggest that lung volume may be more important than airway pressure in this regard.

Paradoxical rise in left ventricular filling pressure in the dog during positive end-expiratory pressure ventilation. A reversed Bernheim effect

Controversy exists whether positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) ventilation lowers cardiac output by reducing left ventricular preload, or by a combination of mechanisms. Sixteen open-chest dogs were instrumented for measurement of left and right ventricular pressure, aortic flow, and left ventricular dimensions. With the pericardium intact, PEEP caused the interventricular septum to bulge toward the left ventricular chamber, increased right and left ventricular end-diastolic pressures, but decreased the average of the three left ventricular dimensions. When right ventricular filling pressure was suddenly reduced, the interventricular septum moved back toward the right ventricle, and left ventricular filling pressure fell. With the pericardium removed, PEEP was associated with a decrease in all three left ventricular end-diastolic dimensions but no significant change in left ventricular filling pressure. Although several indices of contractility were decreased during PEEP, all returned to baseline values when left ventricular preload was normalized during PEEP by a rapid infusion of heparinized blood into the left atrium. In conclusion, PEEP decreases preload and significantly alters the shape and compliance of the left ventricle with the pericardium intact. With the pericardium removed, PEEP produces proportional decreased in major and minor axis dimensions, does not appear to affect left ventricular contractility independent of preload, and alters left ventricular compliance to only a small degree.

Cardiovascular management in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure

This paper reviews recent data concerning the interactions among pulmonary edema, intrapulmonary shunt and cardiac output in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. In canine oleic acid edema, a 5 mm Hg reduction in pulmonary wedge pressure significantly reduces edema, but a corresponding increase in colloid osmotic pressure does not. When pulmonary wedge pressure is lowered, cardiac output can be maintained with infusions of nitroprusside, dopamine or dobutamine. Each vasoactive agent improves ventricular pumping function, and the increase in cardiac output is due in part to peripheral circulatory actions of the drugs. Although pulmonary shunt increases with these vasoactive agents, increased shunt is due to their pulmonary vasoactivity but to the associated increase in pulmonary blood flow. Positive end-expiratory pressure reduces venous return by raising right atrial pressure, and it does not depress ventricular pumping function. Rather, positive end-expiratory pressure increases ventricular filling pressure t a given end-diastolic volume; it does not reduce and probably increases edema, yet it reduces shunt by redistributing the edema. These interpretations suggest several goals for cardiovascular management in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: (1) the lowest pulmonary wedge pressure consistent with adequate cardiac output; and (2) the least positive end-expiratory pressure consistent with saturation of adequate circulating hemoglobin on nontoxic inspired oxygen.