Activity during mastication of periodontal mechanosensitive neurons of the trigeminal subnucleus oralis of the rabbit

Modulation of reflex responses of the anterior and posterior bellies of the digastric muscle in freely moving rats

BACKGROUND

Chewing and licking are primarily activated by central pattern generator (CPG) neuronal circuits in the brainstem and when activated trigger repetitive rhythmic orofacial movements such as chewing, licking and swallowing. These CPGs are reported to modulate orofacial reflex responses in functions such as chewing.

OBJECTIVE

This study explored the modulation of reflex responses in the anterior and posterior bellies (ant-Dig and post-Dig, respectively) of the digastric muscle evoked by low-intensity trigeminal stimulation in conscious rats.

METHODS

The ant-Dig and post-Dig reflexes were evoked by using low-intensity electrical stimulation applied to either the right or left inferior alveolar nerve. Peak-to-peak amplitudes and onset latencies were measured.

RESULTS

No difference was observed between threshold and onset latency for evoking ant-Dig and post-Dig reflexes, suggesting that the latter was also evoked disynaptically. The peak-to-peak amplitude of both reflexes was significantly reduced during chewing, licking and swallowing as compared to resting period and was lowest during the jaw-closing phase of chewing and licking. Onset latency was significantly largest during the jaw-closing phase. Inhibitory level was similar between the ant-Dig and post-Dig reflex responses and between the ipsilateral and contralateral sides.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that both the ant-Dig and post-Dig reflex responses were significantly inhibited, probably due to CPG activation during feeding behaviours to maintain coordination of jaw and hyoid movements and hence ensure smooth feeding mechanics.

Association between oral health and sarcopenia: A literature review

PURPOSE

Sarcopenia has recently been attracting attention as an early sign of the need for nursing care in older adults. Some studies have reported that oral health is related to sarcopenia and its diagnostic factors (hand grip strength, walking speed, and skeletal muscle mass). However, the relationship between oral health and sarcopenia remains poorly investigated and no review to date has compiled the available research on this relationship. The aim of this review was to summarize the current evidence describing the association between oral health and sarcopenia.

STUDY SELECTION

The internet database PubMed was searched using various combinations of related and synonymous keywords for "oral" or "dental" or "oral health" or "oral function" and "sarcopenia" or "walking speed" or "hand grip strength" or "skeletal muscle mass." A total of 27 studies found to be eligible were critically evaluated and their key findings were summarized.

RESULTS

Most of the studies were cross-sectional and conducted in Japan. A wide range of oral factors, including number of teeth, occlusal support, periodontal state, occlusal force, mastication, tongue pressure, and swallowing, were covered. The overall findings were that oral health indices could be significantly associated with sarcopenia and its diagnostic factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Relationships may exist between aspects of oral health and sarcopenia or its diagnostic factors. However, reports showing associations between oral health and sarcopenia are scarce, and definitive conclusions could not be drawn. Further longitudinal studies are necessary to confirm these relationships.

Effect of peripherally and cortically evoked swallows on jaw reflex responses in anesthetized rabbits

This study aimed to investigate whether the jaw-opening (JOR) and jaw-closing reflexes (JCR) are modulated during not only peripherally, but also centrally, evoked swallowing. Experiments were carried out on 24 adult male Japanese white rabbits. JORs were evoked by trigeminal stimulation at 1 Hz for 30 s. In the middle 10 s, either the superior laryngeal nerve (SLN) or cortical swallowing area (Cx) was simultaneously stimulated to evoke swallowing. The peak-to-peak JOR amplitude was reduced during the middle and late 10-s periods (i.e., during and after SLN or Cx stimulation), and the reduction was dependent on the current intensity of SLN/Cx stimulation: greater SLN/Cx stimulus current resulted in greater JOR inhibition. The reduction rate was significantly greater during Cx stimulation than during SLN stimulation. The amplitude returned to baseline 2 min after 10-s SLN/Cx stimulation. The effect of co-stimulation of SLN and Cx was significantly greater than that of SLN stimulation alone. There were no significant differences in any parameters of the JCR between conditions. These results clearly showed that JOR responses were significantly suppressed, not only during peripherally evoked swallowing but also during centrally evoked swallowing, and that the inhibitory effect is likely to be larger during centrally compared with peripherally evoked swallowing. The functional implications of these results are discussed.

Effects of chewing and swallowing behavior on jaw opening reflex responses in freely feeding rabbits

It has been reported that the jaw opening reflex (JOR) evoked by intra-oral innocuous stimulation was suppressed during a reflex swallow in anesthetized animals only. However, the mechanism of JOR inhibition during swallowing has not yet been elucidated. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of peripheral nerve stimulation on masticatory behaviors, as well as the modulation of low threshold afferent evoked JOR responses during chewing and swallowing in freely feeding animals. The JOR in the digastric muscle was evoked by low threshold electrical stimulation of the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN). Changes in the peak-to-peak amplitude of digastric electromyographic responses were compared among the phases of chewing and swallowing. IAN stimulation did not produce any differences in cycle duration, gape of the jaw in one cycle, or swallowing interval, suggesting a minimal effect on feeding behaviors. The JOR amplitude during the fast-closing, slow-closing, and slow-opening phases of chewing was significantly smaller than that of the control (recorded when the animal was at rest) and fast-opening phase. During swallowing, the JOR amplitude was significantly less than the control. Inhibition of the JOR during swallowing is assumed to prevent unnecessary opposing jaw opening motion.

Effects of electrical stimulation of the superior laryngeal nerve on the jaw-opening reflex

The present study aimed to examine whether the jaw-opening reflex (JOR) is modulated during swallowing, and if so, to compare the modulation between the low- and high-threshold afferent-evoked reflex responses. Experiments were carried out on 11 anesthetized rabbits. The inferior alveolar nerve was stimulated to evoke the JOR in the digastric muscle. The stimulus intensity was either 1.5 (low threshold) or 4.0 (high threshold) times the threshold for eliciting the JOR. As a conditioning stimulation, the superior laryngeal nerve (SLN) was repetitively stimulated to evoke the swallowing reflex. The stimulus intensity ranged from 0.6 to 8.0 times the threshold to evoke the swallowing reflex during SLN stimulation over 20s. Electromyographic (EMG) activities of the digastric and mylohyoid muscles were recorded, and the peak-to-peak EMG amplitude of the digastric muscle was measured and compared with and without SLN stimulation, as well as with and without swallowing. Comparisons were also made between low- and high-threshold afferent-evoked JORs. The JOR was strongly suppressed during SLN stimulation. The degree of suppression increased and the latency for the JOR was delayed when the stimulus current applied to the SLN was increased. Such modulation was apparent when the low-threshold afferent-evoked JOR was recorded. Effects of motor outputs of swallowing events and those of single-pulse stimulation of SLN on the inhibition of the JOR were not noted. These results suggest that the JOR evoked by both the low- and high-threshold afferents was inhibited during laryngeal sensory input and following swallowing, probably to prevent opposing jaw movements evoked by oral sensory input during swallowing.

The trigeminal circuits responsible for chewing

Mastication is a vital function that ensures that ingested food is broken down into pieces and prepared for digestion. This review outlines the masticatory behavior in terms of the muscle activation patterns and jaw movements and gives an overview of the organization and function of the trigeminal neuronal circuits that are known to take part in the generation and control of oro-facial motor functions. The basic pattern of rhythmic jaw movements produced during mastication is generated by a Central Pattern Generator (CPG) located in the pons and medulla. Neurons within the CPG have intrinsic properties that produce a rhythmic activity, but the output of these neurons is modified by inputs that descend from the higher centers of the brain, and by feedback from sensory receptors, in order to constantly adapt the movement to the food properties.

Occlusion and brain function: mastication as a prevention of cognitive dysfunction

Research in animals and humans has shown that mastication maintains cognitive function in the hippocampus, a brain area important for learning and memory. Reduced mastication, an epidemiological risk factor for the development of dementia in humans, attenuates spatial memory and causes hippocampal neurons to deteriorate morphologically and functionally, especially in aged animals. Active mastication rescues the stress-attenuated hippocampal memory process in animals and attenuates the perception of stress in humans by suppressing endocrinological and autonomic stress responses. Active mastication further improves the performance of sustained cognitive tasks by increasing the activation of the hippocampus and the prefrontal cortex, the brain regions that are essential for cognitive processing. Abnormal mastication caused by experimental occlusal disharmony in animals produces chronic stress, which in turn suppresses spatial learning ability. The negative correlation between mastication and corticosteroids has raised the hypothesis that the suppression of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis by masticatory stimulation contributes, in part, to preserving cognitive functions associated with mastication. In the present review, we examine research pertaining to the mastication-induced amelioration of deficits in cognitive function, its possible relationship with the HPA axis, and the neuronal mechanisms that may be involved in this process in the hippocampus.

Physiological characterization, localization and synaptic inputs of bursting and nonbursting neurons in the trigeminal principal sensory nucleus of the rat

A population of neurons in the trigeminal principal sensory nucleus (NVsnpr) fire rhythmically during fictive mastication induced in the in vivo rabbit. To elucidate whether these neurons form part of the central pattern generator (CPG) for mastication, we performed intracellular recordings in brainstem slices taken from young rats. Two cell types were defined, nonbursting (63%) and bursting (37%). In response to membrane depolarization, bursting cells, which dominated in the dorsal part of the NVsnpr, fired an initial burst followed by single spikes or recurring bursts. Non-bursting neurons, scattered throughout the nucleus, fired single action potentials. Microstimulation applied to the trigeminal motor nucleus (NVmt), the reticular border zone surrounding the NVmt, the parvocellular reticular formation or the nucleus reticularis pontis caudalis (NPontc) elicited a postsynaptic potential in 81% of the neurons tested for synaptic inputs. Responses obtained were predominately excitatory and sensitive to glutamatergic antagonists DNQX and/or APV. Some inhibitory and biphasic responses were also evoked. Bicuculline methiodide or strychnine blocked the IPSPs indicating that they were mediated by GABA(A) or glycinergic receptors. About one-third of the stimulations activated both types of neurons antidromically, mostly from the masseteric motoneuron pool of NVmt and dorsal part of NPontc. In conclusion, our new findings show that some neurons in the dorsal NVsnpr display both firing properties and axonal connections which support the hypothesis that they may participate in masticatory pattern generation. Thus, the present data provide an extended basis for further studies on the organization of the masticatory CPG network.

Coordination of cranial motoneurons during mastication

Mastication is the first stage of digestion and involves several motor processes such as food intake, intra-oral food transport, bolus formation and chewing in its broad sense. These complicated motor functions can be accomplished by the well-coordinated activities in various cranial motoneurons innervating the jaw, hyoid, tongue and facial muscles. The brainstem masticatory central pattern generator (CPG) plays a crucial role in generating basic activity patterns of these cranial motoneuron groups. However, descending inputs from higher brain (e.g., cerebral cortex) and mastication-generated peripheral sensory inputs also play important roles in modulating the activity pattern of each motoneuron so that the final motor outputs fit the environmental demand. In this review, we focus on the coordination of the trigeminal, facial and hypoglossal motoneurons during mastication. We first summarize findings showing the activity patterns of muscles innervated by these motoneurons during natural mastication, and then discuss the possible neural mechanisms underlying their coordinated activities during mastication.

Trigeminal c-Fos expression and behavioral responses to pulpal inflammation in ferrets

Injury to peripheral dental tissues evokes dynamic alternations in central sensory pathways. We have previously reported that transient stimulation of the dental pulp with noxious heat evokes the induction of the immediate early gene product Fos in the transitional region between subnucleus interpolaris and caudalis (Vi/Vc) and subnucleus caudalis (Vc). A question arises as to whether similar changes occur in response to inflammation to the tooth pulp. In this study, the effects of pulpal inflammation produced by bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS) on face-grooming behavior and trigeminal Fos expression were examined. Face-grooming behaviors were recorded daily for 3 days pre- and 24, 48 and 72 h post- LPS or saline application. All animals were perfused 72 h post- LPS or saline application. Brainstems were processed for Fos-like immunoreactivity (Fos-LI). Teeth were processed for H&E staining. Histological examination of LPS-treated teeth revealed features of an acute pulpitis. Moreover, LPS-treated animals showed greater face-grooming activity (i.e. tongue protrusions) directed to the injured tooth than the sham-operated group. The number of Fos-positive neurons was greater in the trigeminal subnucleus caudalis (Vc) and the transitional regions (Vi/Vc) in LPS-treated animals compared with sham-operated animals, and greater in the deeper laminae than the superficial laminae of each trigeminal region. LPS treatment did not evoke Fos expression in the rostral trigeminal regions above Vi/Vc. These results demonstrate that LPS-induced pulpal inflammation results in significant alterations in the Vi/Vc and Vc, and such changes may underlie the observed nociceptive behavioral responses and may play an important role in producing a symptomatic pulpitis in humans.

Evidence that trigeminal brainstem interneurons form subpopulations to produce different forms of mastication in the rabbit

To determine how trigeminal brainstem interneurons pattern different forms of rhythmical jaw movements, four types of motor patterns were induced by electrical stimulation within the cortical masticatory areas of rabbits. After these were recorded, animals were paralyzed and fictive motor output was recorded with an extracellular microelectrode in the trigeminal motor nucleus. A second electrode was used to record from interneurons within the lateral part of the parvocellular reticular formation (Rpc-alpha, n = 28) and gamma- subnucleus of the oral nucleus of the spinal trigeminal tract (NVspo-gamma, n = 68). Both of these areas contain many interneurons projecting to the trigeminal motor nucleus. The basic characteristics of the four movement types evoked before paralysis were similar to those seen after the neuromuscular blockade, although cycle duration was significantly decreased for all patterns. Interneurons showed three types of firing pattern: 54% were inactive, 42% were rhythmically active, and 4% had a tonic firing pattern. Neurons within the first two categories were intermingled in Rpc-alpha and NVspo-gamma: 48% of rhythmic neurons were active during one movement type, 35% were active during two, and 13% were active during three or four patterns. Most units fired during either the middle of the masseter burst or interburst phases during fictive movements evoked from the left caudal cortex. In contrast, there were no tendencies toward a preferred coupling of interneuron activity to any particular phase of the cycle during stimulation of other cortical sites. It was concluded that the premotoneurons that form the final commands to trigeminal motoneurons are organized into subpopulations according to movement pattern.

Rhythmical oral-motor activity recorded in an in vitro brainstem preparation

The present study employed the neonatal rat isolated brainstem preparation to determine whether oral-motor rhythmical activity, a substrate for the complex behaviors of suckling and chewing, could be elicited in vitro by path application of excitatory amino acids (EAAs). Bath application of EAA agonists (kainate [KA], [+/-]-a-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methylisoxazole-4-propionic acid [AMPA], N-methyl-D, L-aspartate [NMA]), in conjunction with the gamma-aminobutyric acid antagonist bicuculline, either failed to induce rhythmic activity (n = 17 preparations) or induced a low-amplitude, low-frequency burst discharge (< 1 Hz, n = 10 preparations) from the motor branches of the trigeminal nerves when the brainstem was contiguous from the spinomedullary junction to the superior colliculus. Burst activity was in most cases bilaterally synchronous. However, when a discrete coronal transection was made at the level of the facial colliculus, between the trigeminal and facial motor nuclei, the rhythmic bursts produced by the resultant 3- to 5-mm block of tissue following bath application of EAA agonists increased in amplitude and frequency (4-8 Hz, n = 35). Application of 6-cyano-7-nitroquinoxaline-2, 3-dione (CNQX), a non-N-methyl-D-aspartate (non-NMDA) receptor antagonist, blocked the rhythm induced by non-NMDA receptor agonist (n = 4) but was less effective in suppressing NMA-induced rhythmicity. In contrast, D, L-2-amino-5-phosphonovaleric acid (APV) blocked by both NMA-induced (n = 5) and, in most cases, KA-induced (n = 5) rhythmicity, suggesting an essential role for NMA receptors in production of EAA-induced rhythmical oral-motor activity in the neonatal rat. The present data demonstrate that a narrow, bilaterally distributed region of brainstem surrounding the trigeminal motor nucleus contains sufficient neuronal circuitry for the production of oral-motor rhythmogenesis.

Short electromyographic bursts in the rabbit digastric muscle during the jaw-closing phase

Masseter and digastric muscle activities and jaw movement trajectories were recorded in freely moving rabbits during eating. The patterns in these trajectories and activities were similar to those described in previous studies on restrained animals. Although the duration of masticatory sequences, which started with food intake followed by grinding movements and ended by swallowing, varied, the total number of chewing cycles in a chain of masticatory sequences was consistent (1043 +/- 51, mean +/- SD; n = 5, for chow pellets) among the animals tested. When animals ate hard foods, extra bursts in the digastric electromyograms occurred frequently in the jaw-closing phase. The digastric activities were rather short (6.1 +/- 1.0 ms; n = 100) and the amplitude of these digastric short bursts (DSBs) was much larger (1.69 +/- 0.81 mV; n = 100) than in the opening phase (0.56 +/- 0.33 mV; n = 100), which actually depressed the jaw. When a soft food (bread) was tested, this activity was not observed. The proportion of occurrences of the DSB in a chewing cycle was high at the slow-closing phase, indicating that the DSBs were due to tooth contacts during food crushing. Of 1035 chewing cycles examined in the five animals, 124 were associated with a DSB and 415 cycles with a masseter inhibitory period (MIP). The proportion of the occurrences of the MIP was significantly larger than that of the DSBs. Of 124 DSBs, 85 (68.5 per cent) coincided with an MIP. Four were not associated with clear MIPs, although there was masseter activity at the time of the DSBs. The other 35 DSBs were out of phase with the masseter bursts, although still in a closing phase. The durations of the MIPs accompanied by a DSB were significantly longer than those not so associated. The DSB may be a reflex response mediated by periodontal mechanoreceptors when the upper and lower teeth come together while chewing hard food. The reflex arc for the DSB may be independent of that for the MIP, and the threshold for the DSB may be higher.

Demonstration with [14C]2-deoxyglucose of brain structures involved in the masticatory activity of the hedgehog (Erinaceus europaeus)

The different brain structures activated during mastication in the hedgehog were revealed using Sokoloff's 2-deoxy-D-[1-14C]glucose technique. Brain sections of animals having received an injection of 2-deoxy-D-[1-14C]glucose during mastication were compared with those of animals treated during calm waking. Only brain structures that presented a 20% increase in glucose consumption were considered. The greatest increases were observed in the bulbar parvocellular reticulum and the trigeminal spinal nucleus (+80%), followed by structures also involved in mastication such as the trigeminal motor nucleus (+73%) and the hypoglossal nucleus (+64%). Other activated areas, not directly involved in mastication, were for example, the area postrema (55%), the olfactory (44%) and visual cortex (41%). This study emphasizes the importance of the bulbar parvocellular reticulum during mastication.

Properties of nociceptive and non-nociceptive neurons in trigeminal subnucleus oralis of the rat

Recent studies have provided evidence suggesting the involvement of rostral components of the V brainstem complex such as trigeminal (V) subnucleus oralis in orofacial pain mechanisms. Since there has been no detailed investigation of the possible existence of nociceptive oralis neurons in the rat to substantiate this recent evidence, the present study was initiated to determine if neurons responsive to noxious orofacial stimuli were present in subnucleus oralis and to characterize their functional properties. In anesthetized rats, recordings were made of the extracellular activity of single neurons functionally characterized as low-threshold mechanoreceptive (LTM), wide dynamic range (WDR) or nociceptive-specific (NS) neurons. The 342 LTM neurons responded only to light mechanical stimulation of orofacial tissues. The mechanoreceptive field of the LTM neurons included the intraoral region in 28% and was localized to the adjacent perioral area in 65%. For 95% the field was localized within one V division. Responses evoked in LTM neurons by electrical stimulation of the orofacial mechanoreceptive field revealed A fiber afferent inputs but no activity that could be attributed to C fiber afferent inputs. The 72 nociceptive neurons included 52 WDR neurons which responded to light (e.g. tactile) as well as noxious (e.g. heavy pressure; pinch) mechanical stimulation of perioral cutaneous and intraoral structures, and 20 NS neurons which responded exclusively to noxious mechanical stimuli. They also differed from the LTM neurons in that 36% of the WDR and 20% of the NS neurons had a mechanoreceptive field involving more than one V division. However, in accordance with our findings for the LTM neurons, the majority of WDR and NS neurons had a mechanoreceptive field involving the intraoral and perioral representations of the mandibular and/or maxillary divisions; those neurons having a mandibular field which especially included intraoral structures predominated in the dorsomedial zone of subnucleus oralis whereas those with a perioral mechanoreceptive field which particularly involved the maxillary division were concentrated in the ventrolateral zone of oralis. In contrast to the LTM neurons, 57% of the WDR and 67% of the NS neurons showed evidence of electrically evoked C fiber as well as A fiber afferent inputs from their mechanoreceptive field. We also noted suppression of the electrically evoked responses by heating of the tail or pinching of the paw. This effect was considered to be a reflection of diffuse noxious inhibitory controls, and was seen in NS as well as WDR neurons; most, but not all, of these neurons received A fiber as well as C fiber orofacial afferent inputs.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)